Hi,
FYI: I've just created bug #179549 about bad character specing in PDFs created
with OOo in SuSE Linux 10.0. I had just discovered that yesterday.
I found a similar bug, but couldn't find out what the original reporter
actually
complained about, so I started a new one (where I hope the
I wonder if anyone has come up with any problems with houghi's
workaround?
Or any other workaroud?
When ZMD has gone asleep:
time rug sl
Waking up ZMD...Done
# | Status | Type | Name| URI
houghi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 04:05:18PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Edit /etc/zmd/zmd.conf and change the sleep-interval:
[Server]
sleep-interval=1800
Change 1800 to something larger...
Is there a maximum? Are there disadvantages if you use an extreme large
Hi :)
Does anybody know whether Intel's Woodcrest processors will be supported? It's
a dual core Xeon processor.
Would it be a x86-64?
Any glitches, gotchas, advice regarding: kernel, glibc, gcc, ...?
TIA
Rafa
--
50% of all statistics are inaccurate.
OpenWengo: rgriman
Hi,
On Mon, 29 May 2006, Rafa [iso-8859-15] Grimán wrote:
Does anybody know whether Intel's Woodcrest processors will be supported? It's
a dual core Xeon processor.
Would it be a x86-64?
Any glitches, gotchas, advice regarding: kernel, glibc, gcc, ...?
I have some new Dell PE1850 with dual
Hi :)
El Lunes, 29 de Mayo de 2006 11:59, Eberhard Moenkeberg escribió:
Hi,
On Mon, 29 May 2006, Rafa [iso-8859-15] Grim�n wrote:
Does anybody know whether Intel's Woodcrest processors will be supported?
It's a dual core Xeon processor.
Would it be a x86-64?
Any glitches, gotchas,
Hi,
On Wednesday 03 May 2006 19:31, Chad Groneman wrote:
Has anybody been able to get this to work? I don't expect EMC will
be making a version that will work with XEN kernels.
Any news on this? I'd like to have VMWare work under my SUSE 10.1 Xen
kernel.
Why? Because I plan to run certain
You may be able to run windows under Xen.
see http://en.opensuse.org/Xen_Full_Virtualization_Example
-J
- Hide quoted text -
On 5/29/06, René Matthäi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why? Because I plan to run certain standard web services under Xen, but
use some Windows software under VMWare with
As discussed last week, I wanted to continue the discussion about the
package management changes - but not concentrating on the real bugs
we're fixing now but on general issues:
With SUSE Linux 10.1 we have redesigned the way we handle software. We
are proud to be able to announce our new
Hi,
On Mon, 29 May 2006, Rafa [utf-8] Grimán wrote:
El Lunes, 29 de Mayo de 2006 11:59, Eberhard Moenkeberg escribió:
On Mon, 29 May 2006, Rafa [iso-8859-15] Grim?n wrote:
Does anybody know whether Intel's Woodcrest processors will be supported?
It's a dual core Xeon processor.
Would it be a
On Monday 29 May 2006 08:42, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
As these changes are also impacting the user experience regarding
package and patch management we'd very welcome to start a discussion
thread whether and how we still can further improve the current
toolchain.
In a message on a different
Hi,
Any news on this? I'd like to have VMWare work under my SUSE 10.1
Xen kernel.
I don't expect that it ever will run, because both need a modified
kernel and direct hardware-access!
Why? Because I plan to run certain standard web services under Xen,
but use some Windows software under
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may be able to run windows under Xen.
see http://en.opensuse.org/Xen_Full_Virtualization_Example
do you know is this work with any processor? I was said that
this is impossible :-)
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
are proud to be able to announce our new software management
giving the I hate 10.1 game occuring now on suse-linux-e,
you have work ahead to convince some users :-(
In fact we are now able to manage more than packages only.
can we say that one of the results is to
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 04:34:49PM +0200, jdd wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may be able to run windows under Xen.
see http://en.opensuse.org/Xen_Full_Virtualization_Example
do you know is this work with any processor? I was said that
this is impossible :-)
It will work with the
Joerg Mayer wrote:
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 04:34:49PM +0200, jdd wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may be able to run windows under Xen.
see http://en.opensuse.org/Xen_Full_Virtualization_Example
do you know is this work with any processor? I was said that
this is impossible :-)
It
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 05:03:03PM +0200, jdd wrote:
may be better not advertise this before all the bugs are
closed :-))
I disagree. Especially on this list we should look at the future. There
are two processes. One is debugging or looking at the past. Another is
features and looking at the
One question we have is how the new tools rug, zen-updater and zmd
compare to what we had before with YaST Online Update and
suseWatcher. We are interested in every feedback ranging from
architecture, design or used standards and their enhancements.
Going by
Agreed with most of Benjamin.
One thing Id like to say is that Im not expecting this design of now to
continue in 10.2, as you will have time to work on it, no need for a
hack-ish solution, which is agreed by most people Ive asked, non suse
people, zmd people, ppl who work in yast, etc.
Im
houghi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 05:03:03PM +0200, jdd wrote:
may be better not advertise this before all the bugs are
closed :-))
I disagree. Especially on this list we should look at the future. There
are two processes. One is debugging or looking at the past.
houghi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
The most important thing for me at this moment would be that I can use
YaST also to download packages I install and that it make an installation
source I can use.
Why would this be usefull for a single machine? I understand that
somebody adminstrating
Thomas Meindl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
With SUSE Linux 10.1 we have redesigned the way we handle software. We
are proud to be able to announce our new software management backend
which is based on the so-called library libzypp and which also
integrates Novell's
Thomas Meindl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
With SUSE Linux 10.1 we have redesigned the way we handle software. We
are proud to be able to announce our new software management backend
which is based on the so-called library libzypp and which also
integrates Novell's
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Thanks Houghi - I agree with these points. We need to fix bugs and
that's clear and discussed in far too many places - but we need to
start thinking what can be done better for 10.2 and later.
sorry, but I have to desagree. Your can't ask us to talk of
a broken system
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 07:51:14PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
The most important thing for me at this moment would be that I can use
YaST also to download packages I install and that it make an installation
source I can use.
Why would this be usefull for a single machine? I understand
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 05:05:19PM +0200, houghi wrote:
Is there still movement with SLICK or SUPER. I don't see any recent
progress and as far as I can see no 10.1 version.
What I would be looking at is a file list for the 1 CD version and a *.sel
file for 10.1
However if nobody is
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 05:26:47PM +0200, houghi wrote:
What files are to be edited or deleted so that it is clear that it is your
own distribution based on the 3 or 5 CD set and no longer Novell's?
Nobody?
--
houghi http://houghi.org http://www.plainfaqs.org/linux/
On Monday 29 May 2006 15:57, Glenn Holmer wrote:
shudder Get rid of Mono! Using a platform designed for cross-OS
compatibility to write OS-specific system tools is madness in any case.
zmd is not a required component.
yast and zmd share the zypp resolver. Is true, if you want a cmd line client
Hello,
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
With SUSE Linux 10.1 we have redesigned the way we handle software. We
are proud to be able to announce our new software management backend
which is based on the so-called library libzypp and which also
integrates Novell's ZENworks technology. Also we decided to
jdd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Thanks Houghi - I agree with these points. We need to fix bugs and
that's clear and discussed in far too many places - but we need to
start thinking what can be done better for 10.2 and later.
sorry, but I have to desagree. Your can't
houghi wrote:
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 08:12:40PM +0200, jdd wrote:
sorry, but I have to desagree. Your can't ask us to talk of
a broken system we can't have used.
Then please disagree in anothr thread. You will hold back development.
why can't you ever see some others people can have a
sorry if I'm completely OT, but I used urpmi on an other
distribution, but don't ever see it mentioned here.
Is there a reason I missed?
thanks
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 10:53:41PM +0200, jdd wrote:
houghi wrote:
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 08:12:40PM +0200, jdd wrote:
sorry, but I have to desagree. Your can't ask us to talk of
a broken system we can't have used.
Then please disagree in anothr thread. You will hold back development.
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
I don't think we can ever end the discussion. I want to get some
first comments back for our future development - and we'll keep on
asking until the bugs are fixed and you can really use it...
If I judge from your previous posts, the main part of the
debugging is
mandag 29 maj 2006 15:42 skrev Andreas Jaeger:
One question we have is how the new tools rug, zen-updater and zmd
compare to what we had before with YaST Online Update and
suseWatcher. We are interested in every feedback ranging from
architecture, design or used standards and their
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 02:05:24PM -0300, Druid wrote:
Agreed with most of Benjamin.
snip
Is it me or is this message coming in several times?
--
houghi http://houghi.org http://www.plainfaqs.org/linux/
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Rasmus Plewe wrote:
And your different view is that your (generally correct) opinion about
the current version belongs into a thread set up to discuss future
versions?
as I understood it we where said we are proud to
announce... the new version and we want to discuss.
so I understand we
man, 29,.05.2006 kl. 19.53 +0200, skrev Andreas Jaeger:
Thomas Meindl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snip
What I really, really need is the possibility that all downloaded
packages can be stored in a local repository on my hd. That's for
several reasons: Fristly, I like to have a backup -
Like I've mentioned before I think it's good to have Rug for Cli, Zen for
Joe
Six Pack and YaST for more advanced in depth packagemanagement. I won't
comment on the backend setup - libzypp, zmd etc.
- Update in YaST is a mess.
I think there is a danger of thinking along the lines of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jdd wrote:
sorry if I'm completely OT, but I used urpmi on an other distribution,
but don't ever see it mentioned here.
Is there a reason I missed?
For geeko's sake, jdd, you've pretty much managed to kill it.
It's at least the 3rd hijacking on
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 11:20:21PM +0200, jdd wrote:
but if you want, we can forget the actual 10.1 tests and
look only at what we need as a package manager...
Thank you. bug solving belongs in another thread.
snip stuff I agree with
I think that in most situations the version info can be
It's at least the 3rd hijacking on this single thread.
I think the same applies to houghi's policy of posting like there was no
tomorrow
sigh
marcio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
houghi wrote:
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 11:20:21PM +0200, jdd wrote:
but if you want, we can forget the actual 10.1 tests and
look only at what we need as a package manager...
Thank you. bug solving belongs in another thread.
snip stuff I
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:27:40AM +0200, Pascal Bleser wrote:
Signing packages is not mandatory, nor is signing repositories.
If you trust the packages and the repository (which is very likely with
a copy of RPMs you grabbed from a repository on the internet.. you trust
in the first place
- Update in YaST is a mess. We have Online Update, Online Update
configuration/Novell Customer Center configuration, Online Update Setup
and
System Update. Have this gone through usability tests? These items need
to be
reconsidered - and perhaps given more precise names . Especially
45 matches
Mail list logo
