On 1 Jun 2006 at 16:18, jdd wrote:
Lenz Grimmer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
jdd wrote:
if you can garanty that one hard drive failure won't make me lose all my
data, I'ok (I have several HD, of course, each with part of my system)
In
On 1 Jun 2006 at 16:40, Andreas Hanke wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to know if / propose that the following bugs are candidates for
inclusion in the package management update:
- Option to disable missing signature complaints is not persistent
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=175845
On 1 Jun 2006 at 17:45, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
jdd wrote:
given modern disks are large, is it possible to have LVM strictly
assigned at one disk, or separate LVM to each disk?
Of course.
Actually you can have LVM per partition, right?
[...]
Ulrich
On 1 Jun 2006 at 17:51, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Ulrich Windl wrote:
On 1 Jun 2006 at 15:08, Lenz Grimmer wrote:
[...]Logical Volumes[...]
I'd like to propose that SUSE Linux considers switching to this scheme
for new installations by default, too - I now filed this as an
Dňa Pi 2. Jún 2006 08:37 Ulrich Windl napísal:
On 1 Jun 2006 at 16:40, Andreas Hanke wrote:
[snip]
Probably rather cosmetic, but ugly. No fix available so far according to
Bugzilla, and not that important. But maybe later?
- Taboo flag is not persistent in the package manager
We're currently pushing out an update to the package/patch management
stack and I'm asking for additional testing. The previous repository
did not show any new bugs but we fixed a couple of more bugs and made
this time a repository with a real patch in it for testing. Please
read the text below
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andreas!
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
We're currently pushing out an update to the package/patch management
stack and I'm asking for additional testing.
Excellent, looks like this is quite needed ;)
The previous repository did not show any new bugs
-20060601-155143
2 | Active | ZYPP | SUSE-Linux-10.1-Updates
| http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/suse/update/10.1/
3 | Active | ZYPP | 20060602-013154
| http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/misc/packman/suse/10.1/
4 | Active | ZYPP | 20060602-014612
| http://software.opensuse.org/download/KDE:/KDE3/SUSE_Linux_10.1
Ulrich Windl wrote:
On 1 Jun 2006 at 16:53, jdd wrote:
sharing a partition between several disks don't seems so
nice to me (when not strictly necessary), but when a drive
fails, anyway all it's content is lost so... we could have
to good and not the bad?
Our last database server had 46
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
jdd wrote:
can you expand that? I don't understand.
do you mean that one can make partitions on a drive then set lvm to be
used only on this partition?
Yes, sure. On my Laptop, I have one big partition, labelled as LVM.
Inside of this
On 2 Jun 2006 at 12:47, jdd wrote:
Ulrich Windl wrote:
On 1 Jun 2006 at 17:45, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
jdd wrote:
given modern disks are large, is it possible to have LVM strictly
assigned at one disk, or separate LVM to each disk?
Of course.
Actually you can have
Lenz Grimmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
* You can now remove the software catalog you added in the first step.
Use yast2 inst_source and delete the catalog.
Here a popup window appeared, stating: Error: Cannot stop
'/etc/init.d/novell-zmd' service. I
Hi,
Ulrich Windl schrieb:
I think that's basically a dangerous option (Think of your webbrowser
having a global option trust expired and invalid certificates for
secure connections: You would want it per certificate, not globally)
But in any case there's a problem there, an option in the UI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
houghi wrote:
I just looked at what is now there and to make it clear that it was not
LVM. Could be anything, I guess. FAT32? :-)
Almost - FAT32 might be a bit too low-end for that. But it's pretty
common to use ext2 for /boot - you don't
Hello everyone,
This has probably been addressed somewhere in a thread somewhere, but I
can't see it. Anyway, I've noticed that whenever I do anything with the
new software management tools (ZEN tools), my system's fans crank up. I
check top and see that my utilization is in the high 90's or
Fredag 02 juni 2006 18:24 skrev Chad Groneman:
I don't know if it's a bug or not, but it bothers me a great deal. I
don't like my system to have to crank up the fans to do something as
simple as check to see if there are updates available, or install an
RPM.
It's well known that the new
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 06:05:41PM +0200, Lenz Grimmer wrote:
Snip AOL ;-)
Do the new installation and still have what you wanted to keep. Am I
correct in this idea?
Yes, that's how it works. LVM scans the disk for existing volumes and
the YaST2 LVM frontend lists these similar to already
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 08:14:44PM +0200, jdd wrote:
so plain ext2 is definitively the best choice.
As said, that is trivial at this point what it is.
It's also a good idea to keep a separate /boot partition,
just in case some old hardaware with faulty BIOS (may be
there are still some
Am Freitag, 2. Juni 2006 18:24 schrieb Chad Groneman:
This has probably been addressed somewhere in a thread somewhere, but
I can't see it. Anyway, I've noticed that whenever I do anything
with the new software management tools (ZEN tools), my system's fans
crank up. I check top and see
Op vrijdag 2 juni 2006 19:06, schreef houghi:
Yes, that's how it works. LVM scans the disk for existing volumes and
the YaST2 LVM frontend lists these similar to already existing
partitions. You can assign these to new mount points without formatting.
One last question. So the only risk is
Hi,
Andreas Jaeger schrieb:
IMPORTANT: Please report *all* bugs in bugzilla.novell.com and
*always* CC [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Harald Müller-Ney) on the bugreport
and mention that you're using AJ's updated package stack from
2006-06-02.
Knowing this, it should probably go directly into Bugzilla,
Hi Lenz,
So yes, the partitioner would need to create two additional regular
partitions:
- a small one (~100MB is more than sufficient) for /boot
Arrg, I was very happy to have seen that gone for good. SUSE doesn't
even boot any more on boxes with a BIOS too old to need separate /boot.
Will there be a DVD again with the sources corresponding to the packages
in the boxed set (like there was for 10.0)?
Thanks,
Volker
--
Volker Kuhlmann is list0570 with the domain in header
http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me.
On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
Will there be a DVD again with the sources corresponding to the packages
in the boxed set (like there was for 10.0)?
We have two source DVDs lying around -- but as of now they didn't get
pushed out to the mirrors. And I'd actually prefer to just
Hi,
On Sat, 3 Jun 2006, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
Will there be a DVD again with the sources corresponding to the packages
in the boxed set (like there was for 10.0)?
No, not in the box.
Maybe they will burn and send you one upon personal request.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL
We have two source DVDs lying around -- but as of now they didn't get
pushed out to the mirrors. And I'd actually prefer to just offer .jigdo
files for those, as the .src.rpms are in the ftp anyway.
From a mirroring point of view, some jiggledy-scripty which downloads
the files and
26 matches
Mail list logo
