Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Gurkan Erdogdu cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com; James Carman
jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 1:04:48 PM
Subject: Re: JSR 299 / WebBeans - Expert Group
Gurkan and James,
the process for this is like
Hi Matthias;
Is it possible to change the EG representation after forming the EG? If it
is possible, and you would like to go on this way, I could take the
responsibility, if there will no problem.
What is the road map for this changing stuffs?
WDYT guys?
Thanks;
2009/4/16 Matthias Wessendorf
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
I want to step back from the Expert Group. Question is now:
Does one of you want to be on that EG ? This community would
make most sense to have an active OWB committer being part
of the spec/EG.
I would be
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Matthias;
Is it possible to change the EG representation after forming the EG? If it
yes, that should be possible.
is possible, and you would like to go on this way, I could take the
responsibility, if there
...@carmanconsulting.com schrieb am Do, 16.4.2009:
Von: James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
Betreff: Re: JSR 299 / WebBeans - Expert Group
An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Datum: Donnerstag, 16. April 2009, 12:35
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:35 AM,
Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
wrote:
I
into OWB yet, but
personally would highly appreciate to see you as a committer
on OWB in the future :)
LieGrue,
strub
--- James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
schrieb am Do, 16.4.2009:
Von: James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
Betreff: Re: JSR 299 / WebBeans - Expert
Group
Betreff: Re: JSR 299 / WebBeans - Expert Group
An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Datum: Donnerstag, 16. April 2009, 13:07
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Mark
Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
wrote:
Hi!
I've talked with Pete Muir at the JSFDays about the
JSR-299 spec a lot.
Since
? Or those that want DI on JavaSE layer ?
-M
and then make the 1,0 spec final the sooner the better!
LieGrue,
strub
--- Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org schrieb am Do, 16.4.2009:
Von: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Betreff: Re: JSR 299 / WebBeans - Expert Group
An: openwebbeans
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems that we need two so why not you and Gurkan :) ?
Sorry, I followed this thread partly on my phone, so it was somewhat
tough to follow I guess. Do we need two?
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
Does not hurt. Originally we were two as well. Both from Shale
(James and I)
Well, it wouldn't hurt to have someone else on there that isn't a
JSFer. From what I understand Crazy Bob is interested in allowing
the use
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
to be honest, I never understood, why the DI layer needs to be part of
an JEE tied spec... There should be a flexible/extensible DI layer at SE.
Extensions for that could be added to JEE...
+1000! :) I really don't
' ...
Only my personal thoughts btw.
LieGrue,
strub
--- James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com schrieb am Do, 16.4.2009:
Von: James Carman jcar...@carmanconsulting.com
Betreff: Re: JSR 299 / WebBeans - Expert Group
An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Datum: Donnerstag, 16. April
should go under javax.se
sorry ment javax.ee !
--- Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de schrieb am Do, 16.4.2009:
Von: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Betreff: Re: JSR 299 / WebBeans - Expert Group
An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Datum: Donnerstag, 16. April 2009, 18:08
Bob
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Bob originally was interested in having IOC for SE also. But from what I've
seen so far, he is imho one of those who requests that all the annotations
should go under javax.se.
To me this sounds more like 'oh this
I am also very interested to have a full SE version of open web beans.any
one here has checked Spring RCP ?
Spring has a full stack competing with Java EE stack.
they have also a solution for RCP and Fat Clients,
an SE version of JSR 299 can attract lots of Spring developers, the EE
dependent one
: JSR 299 / WebBeans - Expert Group
An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Datum: Donnerstag, 16. April 2009, 20:04
I am also very interested to have a
full SE version of open web beans.any
one here has checked Spring RCP ?
Spring has a full stack competing with Java EE stack.
they have
16 matches
Mail list logo
