Re: [otrs] Premature unlocking

2004-06-05 Thread Robert Kehl
On Friday, May 28, 2004 9:29 PM Robert Kehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday, May 14, 2004 7:57 AM > Daniel Seifert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Here's another example on how useless the current timeout is: > > Thank you, but I believe, we got it beforehand. The Timeout is chosen > unluckil

Re: [otrs] Premature unlocking

2004-05-28 Thread Robert Kehl
On Friday, May 14, 2004 7:57 AM Daniel Seifert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's another example on how useless the current timeout is: Thank you, but I believe, we got it beforehand. The Timeout is chosen unluckily, as it is an absolute measurement. The idea of changing it is noted. Regards,

Re: [otrs] Premature unlocking

2004-05-13 Thread Daniel Seifert
Hi, Robert. Here's another example on how useless the current timeout is: 09.05.2004 23:27:07 NewTicket 10.05.2004 20:07:02 OwnerUpdate, New Owner is 'dseifert' (ID=2). 10.05.2004 20:07:02 Ticket lock. 10.05.2004 20:07:55 SendAnswer 11.05.2004 21:45:06 FollowUp 12.05.2

Re: [otrs] Premature unlocking

2004-05-10 Thread Daniel Seifert
Am Mo, den 10.05.2004 schrieb Robert Kehl um 15:22: Hi, > >>> Can you please compare the rights of '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and > >>> 'dseifert'? > >> > >> How do I do this? > > http://localhost/otrs/index.pl?Action=AdminUserGroup Both dseifert and root have full rights for groups admin, stats and u

Re: [otrs] Premature unlocking

2004-05-10 Thread Robert Kehl
On Monday, May 10, 2004 2:04 PM Daniel Seifert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> Am Mo, den 10.05.2004 schrieb Robert Kehl um 13:28: > have unlocked if no FollowUp had been received. The owner is > changed back to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', what is probably undesirable. I don't s

Re: [otrs] Premature unlocking

2004-05-10 Thread Daniel Seifert
Hi, > Am Mo, den 10.05.2004 schrieb Robert Kehl um 13:28: > >> have unlocked if no FollowUp had been received. The owner is changed > >> back to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', what is probably undesirable. > > > > I don't see where the owner is changed back to root? > > 04/05/2004 16:00:11 It doesn't say

Re: [otrs] Premature unlocking

2004-05-10 Thread Robert Kehl
On Monday, May 10, 2004 10:49 AM Daniel Seifert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> An hour later the customer sended another Followup, setting the >> ticket to state "Open". This is very important - the ticket won't >> have unlocked if no FollowUp had been received. The owner is changed >> back to '[EMA

Re: [otrs] Premature unlocking

2004-05-10 Thread Daniel Seifert
Am Mo, den 10.05.2004 schrieb Robert Kehl um 09:50: Hi, > > So I guess it's a bug in UnlockTickets.pl > > I don't. We forget the $Self->{UncountedUnlockTime}. Let's see: > > The ticket came in on 28st of April, 19:18:06, the owner is root. You > became owner at 20:55:45. > > You and the customer

Re: [otrs] Premature unlocking

2004-05-10 Thread Robert Kehl
On Sunday, May 09, 2004 10:38 PM Daniel Seifert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > $ cat ~otrs/var/cron/unlock > 35 * * * * $HOME/bin/UnlockTickets.pl --timeout >> /dev/null > > This was set by the OTRS rpm default installation and the unlock time > matches the cron-job run time. > > So I guess it's a bu

Re: [otrs] Premature unlocking

2004-05-09 Thread Daniel Seifert
Am So, den 09.05.2004 schrieb Robert Kehl um 20:05: Hi, > > Ack. What we's need were the whole history of the offending ticket > > alongside its contents. May you forward a mitigated version to me via > > PM alongside any additional information that weren't suited for a > > public ML. > > After

Re: [otrs] Premature unlocking

2004-05-09 Thread Robert Kehl
On Saturday, May 08, 2004 11:04 PM Robert Kehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday, May 07, 2004 9:33 PM > Daniel Seifert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Am Fr, den 07.05.2004 schrieb Robert Kehl um 16:52: >> The previous reply from me had to wait 4.5 days (mail received on 29.04.2004 14

Re: [otrs] Premature unlocking

2004-05-08 Thread Robert Kehl
On Friday, May 07, 2004 9:33 PM Daniel Seifert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Fr, den 07.05.2004 schrieb Robert Kehl um 16:52: > >>> The previous reply from me had to wait 4.5 days (mail received on >>> 29.04.2004 14:18:08, reply sent 04.05.2004 15:00:18), but during >>> these >>> 4.5 days the tic

Re: [otrs] Premature unlocking

2004-05-07 Thread Daniel Seifert
Am Fr, den 07.05.2004 schrieb Robert Kehl um 16:52: Hi, > > For example, I had an open ticket where I send the customer a reply > > yesterday at 15 o'clock, which changed the status of the ticket from > > open to "pending auto close+". An hour later, the customer send a > > reply. > > > > 9:35 ho

Re: [otrs] Premature unlocking

2004-05-07 Thread Robert Kehl
On Wednesday, May 05, 2004 6:24 AM Daniel Seifert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For example, I had an open ticket where I send the customer a reply > yesterday at 15 o'clock, which changed the status of the ticket from > open to "pending auto close+". An hour later, the customer send a > reply. > >

[otrs] Premature unlocking

2004-05-04 Thread Daniel Seifert
Hi. Lately (after updating to OTRS 1.2.3), tickets are becoming unlocked way before any escalation time. For example, I had an open ticket where I send the customer a reply yesterday at 15 o'clock, which changed the status of the ticket from open to "pending auto close+". An hour later, the custo