Do you have any requirements or wants from the device that you're buying?
Cheers
Ken
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of James Chapman-Smith
Sent: Tuesday, 2 April 2013 10:50 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
Hi Folks,
Pointless question without saying what you want to do with it.
For my money there's no reason to get a Surface RT at all and very few reasons
for a Surface Pro.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of James Chapman-Smith
Sent: Tuesday, 2 April 201
Hi
I got an RT when they came out, been mostly happy with it, good battery life. I
got it mainly so I had an RT device to test my apps on + to use as a consumer
device and for those uses I can’t complain.
I also have touch cover, if your gonna do lots of typing then you might want to
conside
m] On
Behalf Of Ken Schaefer
Sent: Tuesday, 2 April 2013 10:26
To: ozDotNet
Subject: RE: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
Do you have any requirements or wants from the device that you're buying?
Cheers
Ken
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com<mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com>
[mail
te facebook,
> etc. I'll also use the Surface as a note taking device at
> seminars/conferences.
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Ken Schaefer
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 2 April 2013 10:26
> *T
-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Ken Schaefer
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 2 April 2013 10:26
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* RE: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
>
> ** **
>
> Do you have any requirements or wants from the device that you
What ever you get will have shortfalls. It will also be out of date within
a year. (or less). That said, as others have indicated, you need to
identify (if not to us, then to yourself) what you need it for.
No device does it all, so you need to choose based on your personal
requirements. Battery li
Wow Tony - great quote!
Thomas
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Tony Wright
Sent: Tuesday, 2 April 2013 12:04 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
actually that said, you pay for what you get. The WinRT device is
> ** **
>
> Thomas
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Tony Wright
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 2 April 2013 12:04 PM
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
>
> ** *
RT totally rocks, since I got it haven't put it down, it is just pure
awesome.
It is light, app switching and screen splitting are so easy.
Since I got one I cant remember a day I didn't have it in my hand, most of
times without the cover.
I would like a Pro for alternative set of reasons, but RT
f Arjang Assadi
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 2:14 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
RT totally rocks, since I got it haven't put it down, it is just pure awesome.
It is light, app switching and screen splitting are so easy.
Since I got one I cant remember a day I
gt; *Sent:* Monday, April 08, 2013 2:14 AM
>
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
>
> ** **
>
> RT totally rocks, since I got it haven't put it down, it is just pure
> awesome.
>
> It is light, app switching and screen splitting
ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Arjang Assadi
> *Sent:* Monday, April 08, 2013 2:14 AM
>
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
>
> ** **
>
> RT totally rocks, since I got it haven't put it down, it is just pure
> awesome.*
iving in some form.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Scott Barnes
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 11:27 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
Its legacy simply because no investment will be put into it. Windows XP is
lega
et-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Scott Barnes
> *Sent:* Monday, April 08, 2013 11:27 PM
>
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
>
> ** **
>
> Its legacy simply because no investment will be put into it. Windows XP is
> legacy
gt;>
>> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
>> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Scott Barnes
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 08, 2013 11:27 PM
>>
>> *To:* ozDotNet
>> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
>>
>>
ework sounds more like a
kill-off rather than an enhancement.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Arjang Assadi
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 6:12 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
Not taken over but augmented with,
et-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Arjang Assadi
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 10, 2013 6:12 AM
>
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
>
> ** **
>
> Not taken over but augmented with, .net still reigns supreme, js and html
> allow
>> framework sounds more like a kill-off rather than an enhancement.
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
>> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Arjang Assadi
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 10, 2013 6:12 AM
>>
76 4913 fax
SQL Down Under | Web: <http://www.sqldownunder.com/> www.sqldownunder.com
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Corneliu I. Tusnea
Sent: Friday, 12 April 2013 3:04 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
Y
> 1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913fax
>
>
> SQL Down Under | Web: www.sqldownunder.com
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Corneliu I. Tusnea
> *Sent:* Fr
-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Stephen Price
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 1:44 AM
To: Greg Low; ozDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
The way the Web won.
(insert whistling cowboy music)
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Greg Low (GregLow.com)
mailto:g...@greglow.com>> wr
MVC4 project, and while I like it and can see the appeal of it, I
> can’t help but thinking I could have created the same business
> functionality in a winforms app in less than a day. At least it runs all
> over the place (sort of).
>
>
>
> Regards,****
>
> **
ones,but not to those users of
> computers, please.
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Scott Barnes
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 16, 2013 9:16 AM
>
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Surface
That is not true. JavaScript/HTML is nowhere close to .NET in the store.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Katherine Moss
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 10:47 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: RE: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
Then why are the
true. JavaScript/HTML is nowhere close to .NET in the store.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Katherine Moss
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 10:47 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: RE: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
Then why are the
the store.
>
>
>
> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Katherine Moss
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 10, 2013 10:47 AM
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* RE: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
>
>
>
> Then why are
-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of jasi...@yahoo.co.uk
Sent: Wednesday, 17 April 2013 5:39 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
Yeah, I’ve also heard on various podcasts that while there are a good deal of
HTML/JS apps in the store they are not the majority. I chose XAML/C
testing were part of the
criteria for certification?
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Fredericks, Chris
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 4:36 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: RE: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
I am a recent convert to Xamarin products
*Fredericks, Chris
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 17, 2013 4:36 AM
>
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* RE: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
>
> ** **
>
> I am a recent convert to Xamarin products to do cross-platform development
> all in C# for iOS, Android and Windows – all fr
application, and
you’ll realize that I’m not kidding you guys.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Scott Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 4:28 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
REALLY?..
Had not known that... I mean
gt;>
>> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
>> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Fredericks, Chris
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 17, 2013 4:36 AM
>>
>> *To:* ozDotNet
>> *Subject:* RE: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
>>
>>
-point
protection client is probably the least of the issues.
Cheers
Ken
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Scott Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, 17 April 2013 6:05 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
The reality is most
DotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
The reality is most Enterprises that have moved to Windows 7 aren't likely to
rush out again on Windows 8, they'll probably want the dust to settle and lot
of time the stalling point for migration between Operating Systems isn't j
Nope, but my latest Windows Store app "app idea evaluator" was just released. I
am interested to see what I'd need to do to make it accessible, it also
features some charting which may prove a challenge. I'm then gonna write up on
my blog my experience as accessibility is an area I've not seen m
o that you know I’m not kidding you?
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Ken Schaefer
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 18, 2013 12:49 AM
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* RE: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro
: ozDotNet
Subject: RE: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
Nope, but my latest Windows Store app "app idea evaluator" was just released. I
am interested to see what I'd need to do to make it accessible, it also
features some charting which may prove a challenge. I'm then gonna wri
Yes, it's anything written in Windows 8 modern. Look at it for yourself;
you'll understand.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Scott Barnes
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 6:28 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surfac
30 day free trial :)
ott Barnes
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 18, 2013 6:28 PM
>
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
>
> ** **
>
> Is it just the Apps in Metro store are you talking about the store itself
> and the OS?
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Regards,
ready planning the next one. The
> end-point protection client is probably the least of the issues.
>
> ** **
>
> Cheers
>
> Ken
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Scott Barne
Good point Scott
gt;
> ** **
>
> Cheers
>
> Ken
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Scott Barnes
> *Sent:* Friday, 19 April 2013 11:46 AM
>
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Surface RT or Sur
tion and management
becomes less of an issue.
Cheers
Ken
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Scott Barnes
Sent: Friday, 19 April 2013 2:45 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Surface RT or Surface Pro?
I would have thought by now virus / securit
44 matches
Mail list logo
