# Installing part 1 of 1.
/opt/csw/bin/pca
/opt/csw/bin/pca_20080911-01
/opt/csw/bin/pca_20090224-01
/opt/csw/bin/pca_20090408-01
/opt/csw/bin/pca_20090723-01
/opt/csw/share/doc/pca/README
/opt/csw/share/man/man8/pca.8
[ verifying class ]
Installation of was successful.
# digest -a md5 /opt/
o
knows what ) and thus the libC version SUNW_1.22 is something you don't
have.
Go get wget at www.blastwave.org. Just install pkgutil and use it.
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org <- Email related to open source for Solaris
)= d915e06b37750db9e6d9806f1114a9b8
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org <- Email related to open source for Solaris
s in January. As per usual I received a new
contract number based on my order within about two weeks. I applied that
contract to my sunsolve account two weeks ago.
Today it is gone. I guess that was a short term contract :-(
Clearly something is very wrong.
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opens
gt; included in the price of a server when bought from Sun).
That would be retrograde motion back to the days of the RTU license fee on
the Sparc servers. I doubt you can do such a thing with x86 servers or
machines based on a free download.
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org <- Email related to open source for Solaris
e at least some
basic fee. Even a small fee is a good thing for the engineers involved.
This is the case with Red Hat, Ubuntu and almost anything viable.
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org <- Email related to open source for Solaris
Sol 10 ( update 2 ? )
CDROM and DVD media. To not have access to the patch for a security flaw
would be criminal.
There must be a middle ground where the engineering operations are
sustained with revenue and the security patches ( or similar critical gas
pedal issues ) are avail but everything els
u see
that you can not get patches for free anymore for Solaris 8 or 9 or 10
then that is because you can not get patches for them anymore. At least
not freely. This is the Oracle way of business and it is about making
revenue based on a valuable service. I have no idea why there are people
.
. etc etc
.
I think you just need to edit the man page slightly :
132c132
< .TH PCA 8 "2010-03-09" "PCA 20100309-02" "Patch Check Advanced"
---
> .TH PCA 8 "2010-03-09" "perl v5.8.4" "User Contributed Perl
Documentation"
Sorry for
> Hi,
>
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> I don't like stating truisms, however if you look outside and see that
>> water is falling from the sky, this is because it is raining. If you see
>> that you can not get patches for free anymore for Solaris 8 or 9 or 10
>>
> Just FYI - patch downloads fail for me this morning, sometimes with "503
> Service Unavailable", sometimes with "401 Unauthorized". Seems as if the
> problem is being worked on:
>
>http://twitter.com/SunSolve says:
>
>Log-in issues are happening at present on SunSolve. Changes to
>in
> Hi,
>
> I've just been in contact with the SunSolve Team.
>
Now I see :
Download Summary: 13 total, 12 successful, 0 skipped, 1 failed
Seems to be back up now.
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blas
e8f664360a22e7be6607e10d6 /opt/csw/bin/pca
See packages and catalogs at http://download.blastwave.org/
--
Dennis Clarke 2010 OpenSolaris Governance Board Member
dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org <- Email related to open source for Solaris
ack then I think.
Not entirely sure really. In any case, this is all just history, we need a
contract for sure these days and I'm okay with that if the quality remains
high.
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org <- Email related to open source for Solaris
he purchase orders stop and then the
revenue stops and it was the sysadmins that put the brakes on .. not the
sales reps and not the purchase agents and not some middle manager on a
golf course that has never seen an "ok" prompt.
--
Dennis Clarke OpenSolaris Governance Board
requested to install.
Done!
Checking patches that you specified for installation.
Done!
Approved patches will be installed in this order:
124868-14
Checking installed patches...
Installing patch packages...
Patch 124868-14 has been successfully installed.
See /var/sadm/patch/124868-14/log
first. That would be a
fall-flat-on-face event.
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org <- Email related to open source for Solaris
nst Oracle Corporation for breech of contract and a few otehr
areas of tort.
--
Dennis Clarke
The problem here, that the suits in the offices at Oracle do not get, is
that this was a long weekend. Long weekends are when production servers
often get admin work done because you have some downtime. The weekend was
screwed up and time lost because, as usual, Oracle has failed to deliver
on a v
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Personally I paid money for my support and if I can not get a damn patch
>> that is a breech of contract.
>
> I understand your anger, but I'm afraid that the most probable reaction
> to that would be an immediate stop of Oracle's sup
pathnames
6 directories
5 executables
1666 blocks used (approx)
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org <- Email related to open source for Solaris
I gave up watching this after an hour :
# /opt/csw/bin/pca -f $PCA_FROMFILES -d 140787-01
Using /root/pca_data/xref/patchdiag.xref from Sep/10/10
Host: mercury (SunOS 5.10/Generic_141445-09/i386/i86pc)
List: 140787-01 (1/0)
Patch IR CR RSB Age Synopsis
-- -- - -- --- ---
-
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> I gave up watching this after an hour :
>> # /opt/csw/bin/pca -f $PCA_FROMFILES -d 140787-01
>> Using /root/pca_data/xref/patchdiag.xref from Sep/10/10
>> Host: mercury (SunOS 5.10/Generic_141445-09/i386/i86pc)
>> List: 140787-01 (1/0)
&
>
> If anyone is watching the list, have you seen/heard of this 'problem'?
>
I tried to reproduce your problem with no luck :
# uname -a
SunOS mercury 5.10 Generic_142909-17 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-2500
It all "just worked".
I hate it when that happens .. sorry
a State University
> Contact: orr...@fsu.edu -- (850) 645-8009
> ~~~
So, did everything finished up nicely ?
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org <
> Hello,
>
> just a warning and perhaps a request for some advices.
>
> We have a Sun StorEdge SE3510 connected to a V240. This Raid is used as
> JBOD (12 independend disks, 5x2 mirrored, 2 spares) for ZFS and Patch
> testings.
> I have 2 pools, one on this array, another on 2 local scsi-disks.
>
I'm not sure if this is an error or not but I can at least describe
the situation.
On a site where a Sun server was recently placed under contract and
it is quite old and had been left unserviced for years. Such is the
nature of Solaris, it just keeps running. :-)
In any case the kernel rev on
t 15 years, they have never failed me.
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org <- Email related to open source for Solaris
-124864-26-1
SunSolve Errors
You have encountered the following error(s) or warning(s):
* The document requested could not be found
Anyone seen this? As a developer I live for compiler patches. :-)
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris
d
age
Subject: Anyone seen 124864-26 ?
From: "Dennis Clarke"
Date:Fri, October 29, 2010 12:40
To: pca@lists.univie.ac.at
--
The following is in the patchdiag.xref :
124864|26|Oct/28/10| | |
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-21-124864-26-1
>>
>> SunSolve Errors
>>
>> You have encountered the following error(s) or warning(s):
>>
>> * The document requested could not be found
>>
SPROtlbn7.3
SPROtll7.3
SPROtll7x.3
Done!
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org <- Email related to open source for Solaris
Is sunsolve now officially dead ?
Looking for 119255-77 (1/1)
Trying SunSolve
Trying https://sunsolve.sun.com/ (1/1)
No response there anymore so I have to assume that there is an "official"
replacement.
What would that be at this time ? Anyone know ?
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@open
lly know, when Oracle will get its act
together on this simple yet critical service ?
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org <- Email related to open source for Solaris
ased solution. Yes, it is that big a deal to provide support.
The only thing that keeps the Solaris solution on the table is the ZFS and
cluster features. However, these are not worth much if the support side is
deemed a "risk".
Anyway, that explains my level of concern here.
--
Dennis
an essential man and you have made things work. Someone somewhere
needs to stand up and say "thank you" for everything.
Thank You !
I know you will be back after Christmas and by then hopefully the storm
front will have passed :-)
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca <
ded...
>
> Hopefully the Oracle outage will be cleared soon...
>
There is no supplied wget on Solaris 8 and the one on Solaris 9 has no SSL
functionality at all. You need an outside supplier for things on
production servers still running Solaris 8 and 9. There are a lot of them
s
Despite having a support contract on a given Sun server I am told
repeatedly that simple things are "403 You are not entitled to retrieve
this content" and that is totally wrong.
Things like :
# cat patch_report_missing
Using /root/pca_data/xref/patchdiag.xref from Dec/16/10
Host: ganymede (SunO
At some point one must call it a night and realize that the problem is not
with pca nor wget or even some openssl linkage.
Martin, the Oracle service is broken. Its not your fault and all the work
in the world can not fix what Oracle has shattered.
# ../../bin/pca --debug -f $PCA_FROMFILES -d
> Looks like also that you're not alone... Every SUN customer here in
> Belgium has
> experienced the same issue during days... Hope that they will fix
> everything out quickly,
Or expect a mighty class action law suit !
Really, I don't see how Oracle could mess this up worse.
I have a lo
> Martin,
>
> Thanks for adding this feature, I just tried it (after fiddling with
> my firewall, this
> feature requires http/https access to "support.oracle.com" and
> "login.oracle.com").
> The information I got meshes with my idea of the support that I am paying
> for.
>
> While I have seen a
# ./pca --user dcla...@blastwave.org --passwd --supplevel
Determining MOS Support Levels
In spite of having a paid support contract .. I seem to have no MOS level
support at all.
Must look into that.
--
Dennis
ot;
swup_...@sun.com
--
Thank you for choosing Sun Microsystems and SunSpectrumSM Support.
Your support details are:
Contract Number: XX
Contract Owner: Dennis Clarke
SunSpectrum Support - Reference Guide
I. Your Support Coverage. With SunSpectrum Support, you
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Well, still I am told that my contract is not recognized and is not a
>> valid "support identifier".
>
> Just to be sure - during registration you're asked to enter either a
> "Support
> Identifier" or a "Contr
E: Mar 29 2011 13:28
HOTLINE: http://www.blastwave.org
EMAIL: supp...@blastwave.org
STATUS: completely installed
FILES: 10 installed pathnames
5 shared pathnames
6 directories
1 executables
544 blocks use
n my end.
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org <- Email related to open source for Solaris
--
Download Summary: 9 total, 5 successful, 0 skipped, 4 failed
I'll dig around in that Sol 10 zone and see whats up.
--
Dennis Clarke
dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris
dcla...@blastwave.org <- Email related to open source for Solaris
Has anyone been able to get access to this patch? For that matter, the
README and bugid 5105920 seem to be "secret". By "secret" I mean "we fixed
something but we are not telling you what".
Dennis
> Dennis,
>
> I was able to download 144488-17 and 144489-17 and
> install them a couple of days ago:
>
> ls -al /var/sadm/patch/144488*
> total 168
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 512 Jun 17 17:20 ./
> drwxr-xr-x 1117 root root 23552 Jun 17 17:26 ../
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root roo
:06 patchdiag.xref
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 5422868 Jul 7 20:15 patchdiag.CHECKSUMS_2001-07-07
-rw-r--r-- 1 root 5422868 Jul 7 20:15 patchdiag.CHECKSUMS
#
Maybe nothing new to report ?
+-+---------+
| Dennis Clarke | Elected Memb
then email.
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-----+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
them to you one way or another.
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+-------+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
rch=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+-------+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+-------+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Anyone know why these patches are special and secret ? Is this just more
>> stupidity on the part of Oracle ?
>
> Most probably you do not have the appropriate support entitlement for
> these
> patches. Unlike Solaris patches, all fo them are f
ll the Oracle db
servers. Sad.
No one even mentions Solaris 11 in a meeting at all or they would get
laughed all the way to the street. Seriously, its that ugly.
Dennis
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-----+---
hat cares about Solaris anymore. Heck,
you can not even get compiler patches so why bother to do dev work for
Solaris.
Dennis
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke
936C72FA35B44B
+-+-------+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Can someone confirm that the patchdiag.xref seems a tad broken?
>>
>> try this :
>>
>> grep "^118822" $PCA_XREFDIR/patchdiag.xref
>
> No idea whether there's a reason for those old revisions being included in th
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
<>
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> I guess really the question is, can MOS and Oracle be trusted to provide a
>> kernel patch that won't make things far worse?
>
> I can't answer that, but I agree in that the bug descriptions
> have become pretty useless recently (since O
no.
dc
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+---------+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
> On 01/11/12 05:47, Ron Halstead wrote:
>> On 01/10/12 08:06, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>> On the opensolaris
>>> project someone once said "if you can recall building your own
>>> kernel and it was the 80's then you're a silverback."
linuxmisc.com/3-linux/4ce8d8074fd25f4a.htm
dc
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+---------+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
gp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-----+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
[ ] you're screwed
I would love to see the logic behind this .. if any .
dc
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source
well I guess
dc
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
section it shows I have "Download" privileges. I
> know I didn't see this the last time I logged in.
I can download all reasonable patches except for that one.
Then, 90 minutes later, I could.
Very weird.
dc
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&searc
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
> Were you able to download it from the MOS site after searching? It shows up
> on my search as well but when I select the patch is says I am without
> privilege... The patch is classified as a JES patch and not a Solaris patch.
> It's probably going to take opening a case with the Big-O to get
on
>
Don, you are the best ! I love the fact that this mail list is more
effective for working out these little issues than nearly any other
interface. Gotta love pca.
So when is Oracle simple going to toss out a billion to buy the pca
tool and pay off everyone on this mail list ? :-)
> Jonathan was certainly better than Larry, but I really miss Scott.
Scott and the original first 100 employees built a company from the
ground up. We must keep in mind however that money was flowing like
water and the tech world was booming. Regardless, most ideas never
get off the ground and Su
:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+-------+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
10: kernel Patch
Yep, that's all of it.
So I am guessing that the "O" in the sixth field means Obsolete ?
Can anyone confirm that ?
Dennis
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+-------
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> now then, next item on the hit list is 118822-12 which is a kernel patch
>> from way back that is listed in the patchdiag.xref file thus :
>>
>> core-sparc-SunOS5.10 # grep "^118822\|12" ../xref/patchdiag.xref
>> 118822|12|
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> Another fine bit of police work reveals that patch 148601-01 is a
>> security patch but not flagged as "Recommended" which is weird.
>
> As of today's patchdiag.xref file, it *is* marked RECOMMENDED. I think Don
> explained the pro
do I do this.
You pretty much have to burn a DVD or netboot the latest release and
then perform an upgrade.
dc
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-----+-------+
| Dennis Clarke |
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
wasn't.
Just one of those little nits.
dc
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+-------+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
see lots of oddities. This was just a ... nit I call it.
dc
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-+---+
| Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source |
| dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. |
+-+---+
- Original Message -
From: "Wickline,Bob (N-STERLING COMPUTERS CORPORATION)"
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 6:17 pm
Subject: Re: [pca] EXTERNAL: wesunsolve.net closed
To: "PCA (Patch Check Advanced) Discussion"
> I submitted a SlashDot article about it but it didn't get
On 10/16/13, Glen Gunselman wrote:
> I'm starting to think we may have completely missed the point. I think
> perhaps the situation is just the opposite - Oracle Solaris is overly
> dependent on the customer.
>
I feel that most customer sites out there are not adopting Solaris 10 or
Solari
World class annoying little thing is happening :
Looking for 119757-29 (5/83)
Trying Oracle
Trying https://getupdates.oracle.com/ (1/1)
src: oracle, srcurl:
wgetrc: found /root/.wgetrc
Adding to /tmp/pca.225478: header=Authorization: Basic
/usr/sfw/bin/wget --progress=dot:binary --ca-certificat
On 01/14/14, Thomas Bleek wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> the new developer version has solved my problem.
>
I will give that a try this morning. Thank you for letting me know it works for
you.
Dennis
On 14/01/14 02:39 AM, Martin Paul wrote:
Hi Dennis and all,
as reported, patch downloads stopped to work yesterday. The first
problem was that there seems to be a new certificate used for HTTPS on
login.oracle.com, signed by different CA certificates than before.
So Oracle is broken again.
On 14/01/14 09:38 AM, Richard Skelton wrote:
Hi Martin,
The new development version is working for us :-)
seems perfect here also :
Download Summary: 94 total, 94 successful, 0 skipped, 0 failed
last night at 17 secs after midnight this 144872-03 was slid out the door.
Seems odd to me that Solaris 10 patches are released on specific schedule
except for odd little creatures like this.
Anyways, makes me wonder what bugid 18117543 is.
-- README.144872-03
Keywo
On 29/01/14 03:55 AM, Martin Paul wrote:
Am 28.01.2014 17:30, schrieb Dennis Clarke:
last night at 17 secs after midnight this 144872-03 was slid out the
door.
Seems odd to me that Solaris 10 patches are released on specific
schedule
except for odd little creatures like this.
Anyways
On 29/01/14 11:41 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 29/01/14 03:55 AM, Martin Paul wrote:
Am 28.01.2014 17:30, schrieb Dennis Clarke:
last night at 17 secs after midnight this 144872-03 was slid out the
door.
Seems odd to me that Solaris 10 patches are released on specific
schedule
except for
On 04/02/14 01:43 AM, Martin Paul wrote:
Am 28.01.2014 17:30, schrieb Dennis Clarke:
last night at 17 secs after midnight this 144872-03 was slid out the
door.
Anyways, makes me wonder what bugid 18117543 is.
There's now a service alert document about this issue:
Oracle Support Doc
On 13/02/14 01:40 PM, Diana Orrick wrote:
The Alert lists a T patch for the issue in the interim,
has anyone had any issues with installation of the T patch for SPARC, Solaris 10
T-patch T150400-09 ?
We have systems at 150400-05 and major production systems at 150400-06
(since patch updates in D
Oracle separated out the compilers from the normal support
contracts. Other than to get an additional 0.01% revenue from the one
person in 10,000 that still has these things running.
Anyways, wonder if anyone has seen any benefit or is it just another
waste of money to Oracle.
Dennis Clarke
On 13/02/14 04:10 PM, Brookins, Neil (Philadelphia) wrote:
Yes (compile work) Yes (use Studio 12.3)
No (pay for Studio support) Reason -- license says that we don't have to pay
if we don't want support. I support it myself, for my own use.
When I do a build, I always update and patch my too
I have a V890 that early after a boot ( even a network boot of s10u11 )
does
this :
{3} ok boot /pci@8,70/pci@5/network@3 -srv
Boot device: /pci@8,70/pci@5/network@3 File and args: -srv
/pci@8,70/pci@5/network@3: 1000 Mbps full duplex link up
Requesting Internet Address for 0:21:28
PCA can handle those classic 123456-78-style patch IDs only. Even if I
still had a MOS-account I wouldn't be keen on messing with yet another
style of patch downloads nowadays.
I have tested this and it works great for Solaris 8 and 9.
Yes you can just feed the 123456-00 style to pca and i
On 04/05/18 02:45 AM, Martin Paul wrote:
Am 03.05.2018 um 13:50 schrieb BABAULT.Daniel:
Hello,
Some patches are OK (Oracle Studio, Java), others not …
Seems as if Oracle Premier Support allows patch downloads for Solaris 10
patches before Feb 1st 2018 and unbundled products (Java, Studio, et
On 05/03/2018 04:08 AM, Martin Paul wrote:
Dear PCA users,
I have been informed that Solaris 10 has gone into extended support on
February 1st 2018. This means that you will not be able to download
(new) patches for Solaris 10 anymore with your standard Oracle Premier
Support.
The blog arti
On 1/6/19 9:13 PM, Dave Simonson wrote:
A year ago Solaris 10 went on Extended Support (1/31/18). If you had an
active support contract, you could still get patches available prior to
2018 (Sustaining Support), but nothing later unless you had the extra
Extended uplift added to your support con
r pca to live within the
area of /usr/local with a new openssl and wget and such.
--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
GreyBeard and suspenders optional
100 matches
Mail list logo