[Pce] Re: Where the Controlled ID info shuold be carried/encoded?

Yes, I also think this combination is better. Option 1 Open msg can be used for initial report, and the rest update can be reported by the Notification msg. Already recorded this in the slide. Cheng From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2024 11:34 AM To: Cheng Li Cc: pce@ietf.org; pce

[Pce] Re: Where the Controlled ID info shuold be carried/encoded?

Thank you so much! This is definitely a good way to facilitate a discussion in a WG. I will prepare a slide of this, and share in IETF 120, so guys please, share your comments  Respect, Cheng From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: Saturday, July 6, 2024 3:53 PM To: Cheng Li Cc: pce@ietf.org; pce-chairs

[Pce] Re: IPR poll for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Thanks, Cheng From: Andrew Stone (Nokia) Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2024 7:09 PM To: Cheng Li ; Zhenghaomian ; msiva...@gmail.com; ssi...@cisco.com; z...@cisco.com; pce@ietf.org; pce

[Pce] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-03

Support as a co-author. Comments are welcome, and we will address them ASAP. Thanks, Cheng From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2024 3:17 PM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs ; draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-ven...@ietf.org Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-03 Hi WG,

[Pce] Re: Where the Controlled ID info shuold be carried/encoded?

Hi Samuel, Thank you so much for your suggestions. Good input. Let’s wait for others’ POV. I also requested for a slot to discuss this, if people do not have the time to write some emails. Thanks, Cheng From: Samuel Sidor (ssidor) Sent: Friday, June 28, 2024 11:19 AM To: Cheng Li ; pce

[Pce] Request for 15-20 min of draft-ietf-pce-controlled-id-space-00

Hi WG, I would like to request for 15-20 mins of slot to present the draft of Controlled ID draft. We need to discuss where is appropriate to carry the info in PCEP. We need a slot to track more attention, and hear from the WG before moving forward. Thanks, Cheng

[Pce] Re: Where the Controlled ID info shuold be carried/encoded?

Echo request  Hope to have your valuable suggestions! Thanks, Cheng From: Cheng Li Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 11:46 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Where the Controlled ID info shuold be carried/encoded? Hi Guys， Thank you so much for your helpful review and comments of our draft

[Pce] Where the Controlled ID info shuold be carried/encoded?

Hi Guys， Thank you so much for your helpful review and comments of our draft draft-ietf-pce-controlled-id-space. In the WG adoption, I can summarize our discussion into the below bullets, hope they are correct, 1. The draft is useful, and the mechanism defined in the draft is needed, we

[Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-controlled-id-space-16

Thank you Dhruv, yes, we have updated the 00 revision, and been working on the comments received in the WG adoption call. Will send the response to the list accordingly ASAP. Thanks, Cheng From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2024 5:43 AM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs ;

[Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-controlled-id-space-16

Thank you Samuel for your support and comments, we are working on the replies to address the comments received in the WG adoption call. Will need some time, so please expect some delay. The reply will be sent to our mail list next week  Thanks, Cheng From: Samuel Sidor (ssidor) Sent:

[Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-controlled-id-space-16

Hi PCE, I support the adoption as an author. This is a straightforward and useful extension for PCE-initiated scenarios. I will work on the draft after the draft is adopted for sure  Thanks, Cheng From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 1:10 PM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs ;

[Pce] Re: IPR poll for draft-li-pce-controlled-id-space

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Thanks, Cheng From: Andrew Stone (Nokia) Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 9:19 PM To: Dhruv Dhody ; Mach Chen ; Lizhenbin ; Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Cheng Li ; Shihang(Vincent) ; wang

Re: [Pce] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional

from the previous version is available at: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-09 Respect, Cheng From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 7:22 PM To: Cheng Li Cc: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org; pce-chairs Subject

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07

-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-09 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-09 From: peng.sha...@zte.com.cn Sent: Friday, March 22, 2024 9:16 AM To: Cheng Li Cc: pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org; draft-ietf

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

This is an important extension, and the content is well written, I support the adoption. Hope more people can work on it more critical when it becomes an WG draft. Thanks, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce On Behalf Of Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) Sent: Friday, April 12, 2024 9:23 AM

Re: [Pce] IPR poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

; Aijun Wang ; gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com; ssiva...@ciena.com; udayasreere...@gmail.com; Sergio Belotti (Nokia) ; satish karunanithi ; Cheng Li ; pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: RE: IPR poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls Hi Andrew, - I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft

Re: [Pce] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-24: (with COMMENT)

Thank you Eric for your reply! Respect, Cheng From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) Sent: Friday, April 5, 2024 11:21 AM To: Cheng Li ; Dhruv Dhody Cc: The IESG ; draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-i...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org; hariharan.i...@gmail.com; rthal...@gmail.com Subject: Re

Re: [Pce] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-24: (with COMMENT)

Thanks Eric and Dhruv for your comments. Please see my reply inline. We also updated the drat accordingly to address your comments, please check, HTML: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-25.html HTMLized:

Re: [Pce] Gunter Van de Velde's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-22: (with COMMENT)

Hi Gunter, Please review the update, hope it can address your comments. HTML: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-24.html HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6 Diff:

Re: [Pce] Gunter Van de Velde's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-22: (with COMMENT)

Seems the email is cut due to some reasons ☹ I will update the draft to address Gunter's email. Please check @Gunter Van de Velde Thanks, Cheng -Original Message- From: Cheng Li Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2024 12:00 PM To: Dhruv Dhody ; Gunter Van de Velde Cc: The IESG ; draft

Re: [Pce] Gunter Van de Velde's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-22: (with COMMENT)

Hi Dhruv, and Gunter, Thank you for your comments. Please see my reply inline, will update the draft accordingly soon. Thanks, Cheng -Original Message- From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2024 11:41 AM To: Gunter Van de Velde Cc: The IESG ;

Re: [Pce] Jim Guichard's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-22: (with COMMENT)

Thank you Dhruv for proposing the text, and Jim for your comments. We have updated the draft accordingly, please see the update below. Thanks, Cheng From: James Guichard Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 1:41 PM To: Dhruv Dhody Cc: The IESG ; draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-i...@ietf.org;

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07

Thank you Chairs! We will update the draft according to the discussion in the Mailing list and post it when the window is reopen. Best Regards, Cheng From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2024 10:22 PM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs ; draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07

Hi Samuel, Many thanks for your quick review and support,. Please see our reply below. BTW, we post the proposed update to address your comments and Shaofu’s comments in Github: https://github.com/muzixing/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional Thanks, Cheng From: Samuel Sidor (ssidor) Sent:

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07

Hi Shaofu, Many thanks for your supports and comments. Please see our reply below. Thanks, Cheng On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 12:25 PM mailto:peng.sha...@zte.com.cn>> wrote: Hi Chairs, WG, I have read this document and find it is useful and support its forwarding. Please see some comments

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07

Oh no! It seems like this email is missing over the email sea. Crazy busy weeks before IETF Meeting. Yes, I support the publication of this draft as one of the author. Will response to the comments ASAP after the IETF119 meeting.; Thanks, Cheng From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: Wednesday, February 21,

Re: [Pce] IPR poll for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional

HI PCE, I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Thanks, Cheng From: Andrew Stone (Nokia) Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 6:56 PM To: pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org; Cheng Li ; Zhenghaomian ; slitkows.i...@gmail.com

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-02.txt

-Specific Information in the Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP) extensions for Stateful PCE. Authors: Cheng Li Haomian Zheng Siva Sivabalan Samuel Sidor Zafar Ali Name:draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-02.txt Pages

Re: [Pce] AD review of draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-20

:48 AM To: Cheng Li Cc: draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-i...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-20 Looks good. I see Dhruv already pointed out that the new registry needs an allocation policy. That was my only note. Please go ahead and publish

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12

Hi Mike, Thanks for the quick reply. I think my comments are almost addressed. Please see my reply inline. Thanks, Cheng From: Mike Koldychev (mkoldych) Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2024 6:05 PM To: Cheng Li ; Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs ; draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-12

Hi WG, I read the document and support the WGLC. However, I also have some minor comments below. 1. Abstract A Segment Routing (SR) Policy [RFC9256] is a non-empty set of SR Candidate Paths, that share the same tuple. 1.Nits: s/that/which. 2.share

Re: [Pce] IPR poll for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Cheng Li From: Andrew Stone (Nokia) Sent: Monday, January 8, 2024 7:28 PM To: pce@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy...@ietf.org; Mike Koldychev (mkoldych) ; Sivabalan

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-state-sync-06.txt

Sivabalan Cheng Li Haomian Zheng Name:draft-ietf-pce-state-sync-06.txt Pages: 35 Dates: 2024-01-02 Abstract: The Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides mechanisms for PCEs to perform path computation in response

Re: [Pce] Early Code Point Allocation for draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path

Many thanks to Dhruv and Julien! Respect, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2023 5:11 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Early Code Point Allocation for draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path Hi all, No concerns have been

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13-01

Hi PCE, I support the WGLC. The draft is simple but useful, we should move it to RFC very fast. Some editorial comments: 0. Title of this draft is unclear, what is update of PCEPS. Good to explain more clear. 1. Abstract: This document updates RFC 8253 to address support requirements for TLS

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-04.txt

of the Path Computation Element (PCE) WG of the IETF. Title: A YANG Data Model for Segment Routing (SR) Policy and SR in IPv6 (SRv6) support in Path Computation Element Communications Protocol (PCEP) Authors: Cheng Li Siva Sivabalan Shuping Peng Mike

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-20.txt

available. It is a work item of the Path Computation Element (PCE) WG of the IETF. Title: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Segment Routing leveraging the IPv6 dataplane Authors: Cheng Li(Editor) Prejeeth Kaladharan Siva Sivabalan

Re: [Pce] Please share the implementation status of draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6

Reminder, we only have one implementation info in the draft, I guess the info is out of date. Sharing info of implementation status is welcome. Please feel free to reach to us, and we can update it in the next revision. Thanks, Cheng From: Pce On Behalf Of Cheng Li Sent: Thursday, August 3

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-19.txt

. It is a work item of the Path Computation Element (PCE) WG of the IETF. Title: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Segment Routing leveraging the IPv6 dataplane Authors: Cheng Li(Editor) Mahendra Singh Negi Siva Sivabalan

Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-18.txt

by Chair Dhruv. Thanks, Cheng -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 10:35 AM To: Cheng Li ; Cheng Li ; Mahendra Negi ; Mahendra Singh Negi ; Mike Koldychev ; Prejeeth Kaladharan ; Siva Sivabalan ; Yongqing Zhu Subject: New Version Notification

Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-01.txt

Hi Andrew and Aijun, The draft has been updated to address your comments received in the WG adoption call. Please check if it works for you. Thanks, Li Cheng -Original Message- From: internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 2:49 PM To: Cheng Li ; Zhenghaomian ; Samuel

Re: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep

Hi Marcel, Thanks for the discussion. It seems that we do not need to update the draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor if I do not understand wrongly. If you have any thoughts, please feel free to share further. Thanks, Li Cheng From: Marcel Reuter (External) Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 4:03

[Pce] Please share the implementation status of draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6

Hi PCEers, As discussed in last PCE WG meeting, we heard that there are some implementations out there and should be recorded in the draft, so please free feel to share it to the list or to authors directly. We will add them ASAP in the next revision. Many thanks, Li Cheng

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor

Hi Julien & Dhruv, Many thanks for your work, we have uploaded the 00 revision draft. Will address the comments in 01 very soon, and I think we may not receive too many comments. The proposed update will be shared in Github, and send to the ML before submitting. The IETF datatracker status

Re: [Pce] 答复: Adoption Poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor

Hi Aijun, Thanks you for your supports. Great comments, we can add some words in the next revision in Introduction. Will let you know when we update the draft. Thank you again, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce On Behalf Of Aijun Wang Sent: Friday, June 30, 2023 9:45 AM To:

Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-17.txt

-SRV6/issues -Original Message- From: Pce On Behalf Of Cheng Li Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2023 10:42 AM To: pce@ietf.org; Mahendra Negi ; Mahendra Singh Negi ; Mike Koldychev ; Prejeeth Kaladharan ; Siva Sivabalan ; Yongqing Zhu ; Ketan Talaulikar ; adr...@olddog.co.uk; yingzhen.i

Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-17.txt

, June 28, 2023 10:29 AM To: Cheng Li ; Cheng Li ; Mahendra Negi ; Mahendra Singh Negi ; Mike Koldychev ; Prejeeth Kaladharan ; Siva Sivabalan ; Yongqing Zhu Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-17.txt A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6

Re: [Pce] Proposed PCE WG Charter update

Hi Dhruv, Agree with you, so all looks good to me. Thanks, Cheng From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: Monday, June 26, 2023 4:58 PM To: Cheng Li Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Proposed PCE WG Charter update Hi Cheng, On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 12:24 PM Cheng Li mailto:c...@huawei.com>> wro

Re: [Pce] Proposed PCE WG Charter update

Hi Chairs, It looks good to me. It is great to see SR/SRv6 is added into the charter. I am wondering that some new features may be mentioned as well if possible. We see some new WGs are formed in RTG area, such as TVR, CATS and SAVNET. I am not sure that they will have some related extensions

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor

Thanks Julien! Yes, it has been a long time. I support the adoption as an author. The feature is really useful and needed for stateful PCEP, and the text is ready for WG adoption. I have a concern that we may need to move this draft faster  Thanks, Cheng -Original Message- From:

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor

Hi Julien, I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Thanks, Cheng From: julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 3:52 PM To: draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-ven...@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: IPR Poll on

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20

I support the WGLC. The draft has been adopted for a long time, it should move forward, and I do not have concerns of the draft. Thanks, Cheng From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 6:16 AM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs ;

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15

7, 2023 3:39 AM To: Cheng Li ; julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org Cc: Lizhenbin Subject: RE: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 > Many thanks for your comments, I have accepted most of the comments > from you, and would like to discuss with you about th

[Pce] Github Repo of PCEP SRv6 draft

Hi PCEers and authors, I have created a repository of PCEP SRv6 extension draft for future discussion and collaboration: https://github.com/muzixing/IETF-PCEP-SRV6 Also, unresolved comments from Adrian, Ketan, and Yinzhen are recorded in issues. Will work on the issues with authors ASAP. I

Re: [Pce] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-16

Hi Yinzhen, Thanks for your review and comments. We will discuss with authors and come back to you ASAP. Respect! Cheng -Original Message- From: Yingzhen Qu via Datatracker Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 7:46 AM To: rtg-...@ietf.org Cc:

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15

version available at: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-16.html A diff from the previous version is available at: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-16 From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cheng Li

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15

To: d...@dhruvdhody.com Cc: Cheng Li ; pce@ietf.org; draft-chen-pce-sr-mpls-sid-verificat...@ietf.org; Zhangka Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 Hi Dhruv, Thanks for your reply! I agree with you and it is much better to align with SR-MPLS using LSP

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15

Hi Adrian, Many thanks for your comments, I have accepted most of the comments from you, and would like to discuss with you about the rest. Please see my reply inline. Because we have a lots of comments. It may be good to address them by several updates. So we can close completed comments and

[Pce] 答复: Call for slot in the PCE WG at IETF 116

- the draft(s) you want to discuss: draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6 - the expected presenter name: Cheng Li - will you be attending in-person or remote: In-person - the requested duration, including question time as part of the slot:10-15 mins - the reason why you want to be on the agenda

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15

Hello Adrian, Many thanks for your comments, brilliant! I am preparing a update to address your comments and other guys' comments together, please wait for few days. Cheers, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: Tuesday,

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15

OK, good, I will work on it to prepare a update ASAP. Cheng From: xiong.q...@zte.com.cn [mailto:xiong.q...@zte.com.cn] Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2023 3:25 PM To: d...@dhruvdhody.com Cc: Cheng Li ; pce@ietf.org; draft-chen-pce-sr-mpls-sid-verificat...@ietf.org; Zhangka Subject: Re: [Pce] WG

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15

Hi Quan, The usage is the same as defined in RFC9256. Do you have any suggested text? Thanks, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of xiong.q...@zte.com.cn Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2023 5:16 PM To: julien.meu...@orange.com Cc: pce@ietf.org

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15

Thank you Chongfeng, will fix it next revision. BR, Cheng From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Chongfeng Xie Sent: Friday, February 17, 2023 9:05 PM To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 Hi folks, This

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15

...@gmail.com; Cheng Li ; Mike Koldychev (mkoldych) ; Mahend Negi ; zhu...@chinatelecom.cn Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 Hi Authors, In preparation for WG LC on this draft, I'd like all authors and contributors to confirm on the list

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15

Finally! Thank you Julien! LOL. I support the WGLC as an author and editor. Any comments are welcome, will try to address them ASAP. Thanks, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 1:39

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05

) ; luc-fabrice.ndi...@mtn.com; Chengli (Cheng Li) ; hanliu...@chinamobile.com Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: IPR Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05 Hi Authors, In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance

Re: [Pce] 答复: Martin Vigoureux's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Thanks Martin! Respect, Cheng -Original Message- From: Martin Vigoureux [mailto:martin.vigour...@nokia.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 5:32 PM To: Chengli (Cheng Li) ; Dhruv Dhody Cc: The IESG ; draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-...@ietf.org; pce-chairs ; pce@ietf.org; Julien Meuric

[Pce] 答复: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-vn-association-05

I have read the latest version of the draft and support the WGLC. Cheng 发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Dhruv Dhody 发送时间: 2022年2月22日 20:18 收件人: pce@ietf.org 抄送: draft-ietf-pce-vn-associat...@ietf.org; pce-chairs 主题: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-vn-association-05 Hi WG, This email

Re: [Pce] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Benjamin, Thank you for your comments and sorry for my delay. We have updated the draft based on the discussion between you and Dhruv. Regarding the TE-PATH-BINDING TLVs, we think it will be better to keep it and add a rationale for how PCE could use. That is Option B in the discussion. We

Re: [Pce] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-12: (with COMMENT)

Hi Murray, Sorry for my delay and thank you for your comments. Please review the updated draft to see if it works. Thank you again! Cheng Link: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-13 A diff from the previous version is available at:

[Pce] 答复: Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-12: (with COMMENT)

Hi Lars, Many thanks for your comments and sorry for my delay due to the SPRING festival. We have updated the draft to address your comments. Please review it. Thanks, Cheng Link: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-13 A diff from the previous version is

[Pce] 答复: Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-12: (with COMMENT)

Hi Erik, Many thanks for your comments and question, the answer would be [b] {LB=48, LN=16, FUN=..., ARG=...} For clarity, we have added the following text in the draft- [RFC8986] defines an SRv6 SID as consisting of LOC:FUNCT:ARG, where a locator (LOC) is encoded in the L most significant

[Pce] 答复: Martin Vigoureux's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Martin and Dhruv, Sorry for my delay due to the Lunar tiger new year, and many thanks to Dhruv for your help! I have updated the draft according to the recent discussion in the mailing list. Hope it can address your comments: Respect, Cheng There is also an htmlized version available

Re: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-11

Hi Theresa, Many thanks for your reply! We have updated to address your comments. Please see my reply inline for more information. Hope it address your comments. Thank you! Cheng Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid Diff:

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec

Hi Julien, Since the text already had WG consensus when it was part of the draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec, I would like to support the adoption. Thank you! Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Thursday, January 6,

Re: [Pce] AD review of draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-10

Hi John, Sorry for my delay due to the PTO, have updated the draft to address your comments, please take a look of if it works. Thanks, Cheng URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-11.txt Status:

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional

Yes, support as an coauthor. Any comments are welcome! Thanks Chairs, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 10:01 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional

Hi PCE, I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Cheng From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan [mailto:h...@netflix.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 12:09 AM To: Zhenghaomian ; slitkows.i...@gmail.com; Chengli (Cheng

Re: [Pce] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid

] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 12:32 AM To: Chengli (Cheng Li) ; draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-...@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid Hi Cheng, Thanks for the update and sorry for the late feedback. I've spotted a couple of nits

Re: [Pce] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid

will happen, it seems not error will occur. Thanks for the deep review! Cheng -Original Message- From: Chengli (Cheng Li) Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2021 9:18 AM To: 'julien.meu...@orange.com' ; draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-...@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Pce] Shepherd's

Re: [Pce] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid

Hi Julien， Many thanks for your comments! Will address the comments and then post the new revision for discussion ASAP. Respect, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2021 1:47 AM To:

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-litkowski-pce-state-sync

Support as an author, the document has been written for a long time, and I think it has been mature for adoption. Thanks, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 9:41 PM To: pce@ietf.org

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-litkowski-pce-state-sync

...@gmail.com; Chengli (Cheng Li) Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: IPR Poll on draft-litkowski-pce-state-sync Hi Authors, In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF IPR rules. Please respond (copying

[Pce] Request for Implementation info of PCEP SRv6 extension

Hi PCE, We are going to update the PCEP SRv6 extension draft, and we would like to add the implementation information of it. If you have any info, please reply to this email, we will add it the draft. Many thanks, Cheng ___ Pce mailing list

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05

Yes, support, the draft is useful for SR Policy. Cheng From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 10:52 PM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-koldychev-pce-multip...@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05 Hi WG,

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Thanks again for your help! Cheng -Original Message- From: Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) [mailto:andrew.st...@nokia.com] Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 2:42 AM To: Chengli (Cheng Li) ; julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-...@ietf.org Subject: Re

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Chengli (Cheng Li) Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 10:46 AM To: Aijun Wang ; julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Hi Tom, Sorry for sending the error diff. The latest diff is here https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07.txt=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-08.txt Also, Julien has

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Of Chengli (Cheng Li) Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 10:27 AM To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation) Hi Adrian, Long time no see! Thanks

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Hi Tom, Thanks, please see inline. Cheng -Original Message- From: tom petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect.com] Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 8:02 PM To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Hi Tom, Many thanks for your comments. Please see my reply inline. Respect, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of tom petch Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 8:14 PM To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org Cc:

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Hi Olivier, Many thanks for your comments, please see my reply inline. Respect, Cheng -Original Message- From: olivier.dug...@orange.com [mailto:olivier.dug...@orange.com] Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2021 12:39 AM To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org;

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Hi Andrew, Thanks for your comments, please see my reply inline. Also, the diff is attached. Respect, Cheng -Original Message- From: Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) [mailto:andrew.st...@nokia.com] Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2021 4:21 AM To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Hi Aijun, Many thanks for your comments! Please see my reply inline. The diff is attached. Respect, Cheng -Original Message- From: Aijun Wang [mailto:wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn] Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 11:57 AM To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org Cc:

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Hi Adrian, Long time no see! Thanks for your valuable comments! :) It takes few days to address them, LOL. The latest revision has updated, see https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-08.txt

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07

Hi Hari and PCE, I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Cheng From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan [mailto:h...@netflix.com] Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 1:10 AM To: Chengli (Cheng Li) ; cfils...@cisco.com; jefftant.i

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Many thanks Dhruv and Julien! I support the adoption and early allocation as a co-author. Luckily, before April 1st. Thank you for your work! Respect! Cheng -Original Message- From: julien.meu...@orange.com [mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com] Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 7:09 PM

[Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03

Yes, support. This document can addresses the issue of running out the flag bits. Thanks to the author! Cheng -邮件原件- 发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Dhruv Dhody 发送时间: 2021年2月2日 1:48 收件人: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Hi WG, This email

Re: [Pce] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association-policy-15: (with COMMENT)

Hi Ben, thanks for your reply! Take care, Cheng -Original Message- From: Benjamin Kaduk [mailto:ka...@mit.edu] Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 6:18 AM To: Chengli (Cheng Li) Cc: The IESG ; draft-ietf-pce-association-pol...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org; Hariharan

Re: [Pce] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association-policy-15: (with COMMENT)

Hi Ben, Many thanks for your comments! :) We have updated the document to address your comments, please check https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-policy-16. Looking forward to your reply. Cheng Name: draft-ietf-pce-association-policy Revision: 16

  1   2   >