Revised: bad film or body???

2001-06-29 Thread David J Brooks
Thanks William.I will check this.I should have done the math before i sent the thread but here is the break down of film all 400.. SF1 has had 9 Kodak Max and 3 Fuji Superia since May 01 2001 K1000 has had 6 Max and 10 Superia since May 01 2001 All of the Kodak/Fuji in the K1000 no problem All o

K85/1.8 update

2001-06-29 Thread Jim Brooks
Well, thanks to all the PDML enablers out there I ordered the K85/1.8. The response was encouraging enough on the mechanical side but the best thing of all is it comes with a 6 month warranty!!! Should receive it on Monday or Tuesday. Only drawback is this pushes back the acquisition of FA20-35 a

Re: Re: Friday's Funny Foto

2001-06-29 Thread David J Brooks
Quality with a small q. I think the one on the left was mine Dave Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Use

Re: eBay rip-off -- follow-up

2001-06-29 Thread Ray Allen
I am glad that Albano does not have to prove that he didn't get it. Proving that you got something is easy, either you signed for it or you can say "Yes, here it is. I got it." But just how do you prove that you DIDN'T get something? Or is that just a rhetorical question? Ray Allen. Sydney. Aus

Buying FA 2/24 cheaply - Europe (or other lenses)

2001-06-29 Thread canislupus
Hi! I asked in another thread about build quality of FA 35/2, FA *2/24 and Sigma EX (new) 1.8/24mm. Unfortunately, price is of concern - so I have to choose. I saw that FA * 2/24 is quite cheaper at e.g. B+H and similar mail-orders, but shipping from USA would add a lot to the price (es

Buying from US - best pay method? Safe?

2001-06-29 Thread canislupus
Hello! I put a WTB ad on rec.photo.marketplace for Sunpak Pentax TTL module PT-2D and Ext-11 cable (BTW, if anybody has them and is willing to sell, I would much more like to deal with list member than somebody completely unknown!). I was desperately seeking these. Now a gent

Re: bad film or body???

2001-06-29 Thread Nicholas Wright
--- David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: *snippage* > My last Fugi roll shot this past weekend > in that camera has 5 pic's near the end,some with > the elipse,some with some lines running > vertical from the film sprocket holes up the neg and > visible on the print as a greeny tint.I T

Re: Friday's Funny Foto

2001-06-29 Thread Cy Galley
So which one did YOU buy??? - Original Message - From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 1:15 AM Subject: Friday's Funny Foto http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/Quality_Used_Cars.jpg While running some errands I ca

Re: MZ-S review: Part 2

2001-06-29 Thread Kevin Waterson
Is there a URL for these? Kind regards Kevin - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

RE: Comet Picture Question

2001-06-29 Thread Peifer, William [OCDUS]
Tom C. (aimcompute) inquired thus about stacked astro-exposures: > The picture credits at the above link says the image is a combination > of 4 exposures totaling 20 minutes. > I was wondering why, but came up with the reciprocity failure issue as > I was writing this. Is that the reason? Does

My Final Words (by now) in my Ebay Issue

2001-06-29 Thread Albano_Garcia
Well. First... THANKS!!! I never imagined I would receive so much support from list members. I really appreciate it, really. What I will do now is to finish my comments in this issue, since Mike suggested to keep things cool, and getting them hot would ruin it all. I think he is right, so I sugge

Re: Ebay Warning (Victim of Rip Off)

2001-06-29 Thread Albano_Garcia
Mas canadienses copados... I'm sure that there are other Canucks on the list that are in the same situation as I am, but I'll mention this anyway. My long distance phone plan allows me to make as many long distance calls as I want within Canada, for (essentially) free, after 6 pm. Due to the

Re: eBay rip-off -- follow-up

2001-06-29 Thread Bob Blakely
Possibly, but I suspect that those simple words might be insufficient. Some responsibilities cannot be abrogated by a simple statement that the vendor "is not liable" for certain normal expectations. An example is the common warning on the back of an amusement park ticket that says that the manage

Re: eBay rip-off -- follow-up

2001-06-29 Thread Bob Blakely
Recent news item: Post office delivers letter 89 years late! Over thirty years, I have had one house payment and one Sears payment lost in the mail. The house payment actually arrived about two months late. I'd not put a stop payment on the check, so that month was a severely short month, cash wi

RE: eBay rip-off -- follow-up

2001-06-29 Thread Rob Brigham
Surely its only worthless if the amusement park management were guilty of negligence which is a different thing and a disclaimer could not protect them from negligence. Fair enough, they would still be liable if they used a disreputable courier or addressed it to the wrong place or put it in inad

RE: MZ-S sales

2001-06-29 Thread Matamoros, Cesar A.
As I have commented previously, it is a higher frequency than the ZX-5. The rewind really surprised me in terms of its noise. When reading Pål's comments of it being ultra quiet I can say that mine is not. Like I wrote earlier, compared to a Canon ? and a Nikon N80 there is

RE: Revised: bad film or body???

2001-06-29 Thread Peifer, William [OCDUS]
Hi Dave, Perhaps there are slight dimensional differences between the Kodak film cassette and the Fuji film cassette, such that the Kodak cassettes might seal in your SF1, but the Fuji cassettes don't completely seal? Not sure if this is likely, but it seems not outside the realm of possibility.

Sigma Lens

2001-06-29 Thread Jim . Fellows
Does anybody know if there is a compatablidy issue with a Sigma 24/2.8 Super wide angle II with PZ-1 or PZ-1P. I have an opportunity to pick one up very cheaply and I want it to work with my new to me Z-5 Jim Fellows Manufacturing Manager Prentice Hall School Phone: 781-455-1306 Fax: 781-455-1

Enabled again!

2001-06-29 Thread Stephen Moore
KEH still rocks, of course, but let me put in word for Charlotte Camera as an alternate source of good used gear. (No affiliation, etc., etc.) Last night received an FC-1 in 9 condition, which had been on their web page for months, and was recently marked down to $79. Why only a 9 I don't kno

Re: Buying FA 2/24 cheaply - Europe (or other lenses)

2001-06-29 Thread Martin Trautmann
The only cheap offer I'm aware of is the current discount on the Sigma AF 180/3.5 IF APO Macro for DM 999 instead of DM 2349 (46 cm, 1:1, 945 g) That's about US$ 450 instead of > 1000. Regards Martin - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net

RE: eBay rip-off -- follow-up

2001-06-29 Thread Lewis, Gerald
I have not yet seen anyone refering to Argentine customs. For an international delivery a customs declaration should have been filled out and attached to the package by the shipper. Upon arrival in the destination country the package must first pass through the customs house where any duty or ta

Re: eBay rip-off -- follow-up

2001-06-29 Thread Bob Blakely
From: "Rob Brigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Surely its only worthless if the amusement park management were guilty > of negligence which is a different thing and a disclaimer could not > protect them from negligence. No. The amusement park management may often (though not always) be liable even t

Re: Build quality of 3rd party lenses

2001-06-29 Thread Matti Etelapera
[3rd party talk] >(and until recently a manual 80-200 2.8 SD zoom) and they are all well >built - ver much like Pentax MF lenses. Sturdy, maybe slightly heavy, >lots of metal, solid. I'd always consider a Tok. I have Tamron 80-200/2.8 and 24/2.5 adaptall-2 lenses. I have aquired both of them u

Re: Ebay Warning (Victim of Rip Off)

2001-06-29 Thread Albano_Garcia
Oooops!!! This email was supposedly for a pair of friends here in Argentina. I was forwarding them some of the answers of list members, and they are amazed too with the support provided to me. "Mas canadienses copados" means "More cool canadians" Copado is a Buenos Aires slang for cool, cute, gr

I'm outta here again

2001-06-29 Thread Doug Brewer
Off to attend a funeral, do some camping, and maybe squeeze off a frame or two in Georgia. I'll be back late next Thursday. y'all be good. Doug -- Douglas Forrest Brewer Ashwood Lake Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.alphoto.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To u

Re: Comet Picture Question

2001-06-29 Thread aimcompute
Thanks Bill. That helps a lot.Since I do not have any guiding system at all right now, I guess it's pretty stupid of me to consider anything like a 20-30 min exposure. The comet would show the same apparent motion as the starfield plus it's own. Tom C. - Original Message - From: "

Re: Friday's Funny Foto

2001-06-29 Thread aimcompute
I like it Shel. Thanks. Tom C. - Original Message - From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 12:15 AM Subject: Friday's Funny Foto > http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/Quality_Used_Cars.jpg > > While running some

FS: Sunpak G4500DX (AT555) ttl flash (potato masher)

2001-06-29 Thread canislupus
Similar in power and features (some more, some less) to Metz 45, this is the classic example of Potato-masher style flash. Until the very last moment, I wanted to keep it, even wanting to order some used accessories from USA. But then, although this flash is very powerful, I don't use it at f

Re: eBay rip-off -- follow-up

2001-06-29 Thread Stan Halpin
> From: Bob Blakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You > are welcome, as a seller, to ship without insurance. You must, of course, > accept responsibility for your choices (as in all of life), and if the > shipment is lost (admittedly improbable), you must pony up for the buyer.

24-90 distortion, was: New series of lenses, FA50 1.4 and 1.7 low availability.

2001-06-29 Thread Raimo Korhonen
What you see in the viewfinder does not matter that much - it´s the on film performance that counts. There is some distortion but less than e.g.. 4.0/28-70 has. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähet

Vs: my 1st zoom/35-105/3.5?

2001-06-29 Thread Raimo Korhonen
I have no idea of fair price but I have this lens and it is optically very good. If you can live with the size and weight, you are not going to be disappointed. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähet

Re: Build quality of 3rd party lenses

2001-06-29 Thread Isaac Crawford
Cotty wrote: > > Hi Frantisek, > > I've always found the build quality of Tokina AT-Xs exceptionally good. I > have a 90mm 2.5 Macro and a 28-70 2.6/2.8 zoom (and until recently a > manual 80-200 2.8 SD zoom) and they are all well built - ver much like > Pentax MF lenses. Sturdy, maybe slightly

Re: Build quality of 3rd party lenses

2001-06-29 Thread admin
Isaac Crawford wrote: > In my experience of buying and selling used equipment, most lenses >aren't built very well today regardless of who made them. The FA* lenses >are an exception, along with other camera manufacturers top end lenses. >I've never seen a third party manufactured lens that

OT: Mike Johnston newsletter

2001-06-29 Thread Robert Harris
Mike Johnston now is putting out a printed photo newsletter. No price listed in the announcement, but since it involves printing and postage costs, I assume it is not free. (I don't know if this has been noted on this list yet, if so I missed it.) BTW, I believe one of the testimonials at the bo

Re: Comet Picture Question

2001-06-29 Thread Doctor Digi
> Another reason this is often done is to improve signal-to-noise ratio in the > final image. A single twenty minute exposure is going to be degraded to > some extent by twenty minutes of atmospheric turbulence, scattered light > from cars passing in the distance, etc. By shortening the duratio

RE: 24-90 distortion, was: New series of lenses, FA50 1.4 and 1.7 low availability.

2001-06-29 Thread Frits J. Wüthrich
Interesting, I thought about that, but was advised there should be no difference between the film and the view finder image. I will see the results shortly of some test shots. I sure agree, it is what the film sees that counts. Frits > > What you see in the viewfinder does not matter that much -

RE: my 1st zoom/35-105/3.5?

2001-06-29 Thread Frits J. Wüthrich
> The 90mm f/2,5 Tamron is a Macro lens with a legend in itself. It > has been revamped > at a certain point but has always enjoyed the reputation of a > very sharp macro/portrait > lens, thus challenging brand macro lenses. I used to own one and > it was outstanding, > although the new Tamron 90m

RE: MZ-S sales

2001-06-29 Thread Dan Scott
Len wrote: >Maybe the only way for you to find out would be to listen to >some other MZ-S's to make a direct comparison. > >Perhaps the differences in sound being reported can be >attributed in part to differences in hearing. One person says >it's high-pitched and loud and another says it's very

Re: Decisions decisions

2001-06-29 Thread Todd Stanley
I would leap at that chance! Look at it this way, it's not everyday you come across an almost new late model LX in mint condition. On the other hand you will be able to pick up a new MZ-S easily at many camera stores for several years to come. Todd At 06:17 AM 6/30/01 +0800, you wrote: >Hi al

Re: Decisions decisions

2001-06-29 Thread Dan Scott
>On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, chris wrote: > >John, you have the best stories. :) I still have your >old-man-with-the-tripod-in-the-Botannical-Gardens story around >somewhere. Thanks for the read! > >chris Hey, I want to read that (I'm a middle-aged-man- ... etc.). I want to know what the future has i

Re: Decisions decisions

2001-06-29 Thread Leon Altoff
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001 06:17:10 +0800, Jon Hope wrote: >Hi all > >I was offered an almost brand new LX the other day. I don't know that I >want an LX, as I tend to favour my AF cameras exclusively. It's eating away >into my brain at present, which is a bad thing [tm], as I'd like an MZ-S. >If I b

Re: pentax-discuss-digest V1 #907

2001-06-29 Thread Pentxuser
In a message dated 6/29/01 3:12:34 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Hi all I was offered an almost brand new LX the other day. I don't know that I want an LX, as I tend to favour my AF cameras exclusively. It's eating away into my brain at present, which is a bad thi

Re: Another image search engine

2001-06-29 Thread William Robb
The PUG is, thanks to Mark Roberts and Rob Studdert for their assistance, protected from reputable search engines. Search engines of ill repute cannot be protected against, unfortunately. William Robb Remember, the LX Gallery is coming up. Please see: http://pug.komkon.org/LX_Gallery/LX_Submit.ht

Re: Decisions decisions

2001-06-29 Thread Jon Hope
Hi all Thanks for your insights. I'll think about it for a couple of weeks more. There isn't any hurry to decide. I did get one piece of advice off list. "It would be nice to have but wouldn't an MZ-S be right up your alley?" Someone knows me very well indeed. :-) Cheers Jon Relax! Take li

Re: Decisions decisions

2001-06-29 Thread Jon Hope
At 11:24 30/06/01, you wrote: >It's your choice. I do hope you still get the FA35f2 though because I >haven't seen one yet and I wanted to see your's when I'm over in Perth! Oh, have no worries on that front. I get the FA 35/2 on Tuesday or Wednesday, whenever it lobs in Perth. Had they had one

Re: Friday's Funny Foto

2001-06-29 Thread David S.
Shel Belinkoff wrote: > http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/Quality_Used_Cars.jpg > > While running some errands I came across this scene, grabbed a > Pentax, and caught this scene just moments before one of the > cars was sold. > -- You could sell those on ebay as "minty" David S. - This m

Re: Another image search engine

2001-06-29 Thread David S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You might want to see if any of your images are thumbnailed on >http://images.google.com > They don't seem to have grepped the PUG like Fast Search and Transfer did > and, being a reputable search engine, they do obey robots.txt and stay out > of places they don't be

Re: Vs: my 1st zoom/35-105/3.5?

2001-06-29 Thread Todd Stanley
Fair price seems to be about $150-$225, depending on condition. It's a great lens optically, but heavy for a WA-short tele zoom. I paid $175 for mine. Todd At 05:47 PM 6/29/01 +0200, you wrote: >I have no idea of fair price but I have this lens and it is optically very good. If you can live

Re: eBay rip-off -- follow-up

2001-06-29 Thread Bob Blakely
HAR! Regards, Bob... -- "Those who say that life is worth living at any cost have already written an epitaph of infamy, for there is no cause and no person that they will not betray to stay alive." Sidney Hook From: "Frits J. Wüthrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: Another image search engine

2001-06-29 Thread tom
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > You might want to see if any of your images are thumbnailed on >http://images.google.com Man, I think they have every pic on my site, including the damn buttons! tv - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net

LX Gallery

2001-06-29 Thread William Robb
Greetings: I am seeking a written history of the Pentax LX camera for the upcoming LX gallery (I am still soliciting submissions) for inclusion in the gallery. A web search has given me some of what I am looking for, but I have yet to find a complete history of the LX from beginning to end. It may

Re: pentax-discuss-digest V1 #907

2001-06-29 Thread Peter Alling
That's the kind of deal that only comes along once in a life time. I'd grab it. (The MZ-S will be around for a long time a "Brand New" LX for that price is something that you may never see again). At 11:24 PM 6/29/2001 -0400, you wrote: >In a message dated 6/29/01 3:12:34 PM Pacific Daylight Tim