Before ramming a hockey stick
William Robb wrote:
Gosh, I thought professional only meant, its
your way of earning an income,
I didn't realise it is so complicated!
Maybe it should be like any other profession.
You get to call yourself a professional after
you have earned
At 13:55 29/07/01, you wrote:
In a message dated 7/29/01 1:50:36 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The professionalism is in the photographer, not the camera. :-)
OK, if it's ~that~ simple, ~you~ use the disposable and I'll use the MZ-S.
I'll whip your butt everyday and
William Robb writes:
I am wondering what browsers people are using for viewing the PUG. If you would
kindly click here and tell me what version of which browser you are using,
Click where?
For the record I'm using MSIE 5.5.
Cheers,
- Dave
David A. Mann, B.E. (Elec)
Hi,
my experience was quite the opposite. When I bought my first LX one of
the things that immediately struck me was how quiet it was compared to
my MXs, of which I had 2 at the time, and my Super A. I later had 3
LXs, all equally quiet compared to the MX. The type of noise they make
is also
Nicholas Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] asks about Voigtlander rangefinders
considerably cheaper than the Leica bodies. How good would these be suited
to what I need to do? Can I use Leica screw mount lenses on these bodies?
Thanks again, sorry this is heading somewhat off topic. :)
There are
- Original Message -
From: Matt Kozak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cable release question
| Does anyone out there know how the ZX series' electronic releases
| work?
Works fine:))
| There are three pins on the camera's socket... Do I just to short two
| of them or is there some hideous
Hi,
could someone translate from Japanese please:
http://www.BDimitrov.de/temp/colors.gif
TIA,
Boz
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org
I believe that part c) you mention below is only needed after you have a certain
number of pros. Pentax is capable of handling the relative low nomber of pro users
within their current infrastructure. Thats why I don't think Pentax is keen to aquire
a higher percentage of pro users because
I have had this e-mail 4 times this week.The sender is in bold letters
GUNJUN
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 21:43:20 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I got this from Ameritech.net today
Alert
This is a virus notification
I have done 1 show so far (Nikon D1)and have 3 other events(horses)lined up for August
and possible 2 in Sept.I fiqure $300-500 per event and my equip costs
are in the mid $7000 to startup.I also have many shows for the winter set up to,so
keeping
that in mind i haope to have it all payed for by
Thanks to everyone who replied.
I decided not to buy Pentax filters made by Hoya - think it`s better to
get B+W or original ones.
Kryt
--
Czatuj, wylij sms-y, sprawd poczt
Zainstaluj OnetKomunikatora [ http://ok.onet.pl/ ]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
Bill,
A better approach would be to ask Igor (Komkon's admin) to send you
(or to tell you the means to get) a browser type statistics. It
might happen that Komkon's Apache server stores in the logs the
browser type information contained by all HTTP requests.
Servus, Alin
William
Yes, with reference to the person.
Aparently not with reference to the equipment.
CRB
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 22:36:18 +0100
Gosh, I thought professional only meant, its your way of earning an income,
I didn't realise it is so complicated!
Frits
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Jon Hope wrote:
There are two types of professional. Those that are associated with a
profession (eg doctors, lawyers, prostitutes etc) and those that perform
for reward.
. Too many of the former never progress past what they learnt
when they were gaining their degrees (or whatever is
I didn't know that being a professional (or any other type) or photographer
had to do with whipping butts.
regards,
frank
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/29/01 1:50:36 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The professionalism is in the photographer, not the
Gosh, I thought professional only meant, its your way
of earning an income, I didn't realise it is so complicated!
Seems to me we're starting to mix up a couple of things.
A professional's camera is a camera used by a professional.
It can be anything that _some_ pro finds useful. (And
Bob Walkden wrote:
I later had 3 LXs, all equally quiet compared
to the MX. The type of noise they make is also
very different with, imo, the LX having a greater
'quality' noise.
I agree that the LX has a more quality sound (I can't bring myself to
call it noise) than the MX.
--
Shel
An excellent post, Glen. I don't disagree with anything you've
written. I guess a point that I was driving toward in the few posts
I've made on this thread over the last day or two, is that the term
pro or professional when referring to cameras, is virtually
meaningless, due to the wide variety
The Professionals' Work section (pages 29-86) of the 2000-2001 PENTAX
PHOTO ANNUAL exhibits photographs taken with the following cameras:
Pentax 645/645n -- 17 photographs
Pentax MZ-3 -- 12 photographs
Pentax 67/67 II -- 6 photographs
Pentax LX
Frank Theriault wrote:
You are, of course, correct, insofar as when
one says pro camera, a certain image comes
to mind.
True, Frank, but might that image be different for different people,
based on their own experiences and affectations. For example, someone
interested in studio
yes, that's pretty siple and streight forward one.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Professional
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 23:01:15 -0600
Gosh, I thought professional only meant, its
your way of earning an income,
I didn't
D. Glenn Arthur Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A professional camera has different nuances. It refers to
a camera people _expect_ a significant number of pros to find
useful. And on that basis, it really has at least two meanings:
Nah, A professional camera is just one that doesn't earn its
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Frank Theriault wrote:
You are, of course, correct, insofar as when
one says pro camera, a certain image comes
to mind.
True, Frank, but might that image be different for different people,
based on their own experiences and affectations. For example, someone
In a message dated 7/29/01 3:32:35 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The professionalism is in the photographer, not the camera. :-)
OK, if it's ~that~ simple, ~you~ use the disposable and I'll use the MZ-S.
I'll whip your butt everyday and twice on Sundays.
You may
In a message dated 7/29/01 3:33:21 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William Robb writes:
I am wondering what browsers people are using for viewing the PUG. If you
would
kindly click here and tell me what version of which browser you are using,
Click where?
For
actually my machine was infected with this virus a coupla days ago - the
adress was from one of the list members, so i opened the attached
document without suspecting anything. luckily the Bigfix site rerouted
me immediately to the instructions for getting rid of the thing before
my personal
Hi,
Admirers of Phillip Jones Griffiths will be pleased to learn that his
legendary and almost mythical book 'Vietnam, Inc' is to be republished
for the 1st time later this year. First published in 1971 and an
instant sell-out this book was a huge condemnation of the US
involvement in Vietnam.
In a message dated 7/29/01 8:42:44 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I didn't know that being a professional (or any other type) or photographer
had to do with whipping butts.
Not literally at least but in quality of images, product output and
production value wise?
In a message dated 7/29/01 8:44:20 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
So we have one subjective meaning, one arbitrary meaning, and
the closest we get to an objective standard is a closely
related (not the same) concept with _fuzzy_boundaries_.
There is nothing fuzzy
Saw my very first MZ-S on friday.
Just checking out the second hand supplies in Ottawa's camera shops. ($CAN
1499 btw)
Was making an impulse buy of a 40mm pancake coupled with an ME at the time.
Didn't want the ME body, but it was a job lot and they wouldn't split it.
As it was 5 minutes past
It was my understanding that the LX was quiet loud compared to the MX. I am
mistaken here?
That's my opinion too. My LX makes an almighty 'clunk'. I had a P30n
briefly (part of a job lot I bought) and that was noisy too. I was very
surprised.
My MX is definitely the quietest of the lot. To my
Hi Boz,
Glass Molded Aspherical Lens,
High Refraction Low Dispersion Lens,
Extra Low Dispersion Lens
Sincerely,
Take Ueda, Osaka, Japan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.tripod.co.jp/hayatama/photo/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Hi,
had my day trip to Brussles yesterday, and thanks to everybody who
made suggestions about things to do.
I went straight from the railway station to the Botanique for the
Salgado exhibition, where I spent 2 hours looking at the photos. I
think I've worn out my eyeballs.
From there I walked
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: Professional: meta-discussion
In a message dated 7/29/01 8:44:20 AM Eastern
Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
So we have one subjective meaning, one
Mafud responded:
In a message dated 7/29/01 8:44:20 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
So we have one subjective meaning, one arbitrary meaning, and
the closest we get to an objective standard is a closely
related (not the same) concept with _fuzzy_boundaries_.
- Original Message -
From: Frank Theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 5:53 AM
Subject: Re: Professional
I didn't know that being a professional (or
any other type) or photographer
had to do with whipping butts.
Depends on the type of
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 11:55 PM
Subject: Re: Professional
In a message dated 7/29/01 1:50:36 AM Eastern
Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The professionalism is in the photographer,
not the camera.
I recently read an article in which the writer noted which single
camera he'd take with him on a trip around the world. One camera, one
body. We've recently had a few threads in a similar vein, but all
Pentax related. So, I'm curious - if you had one camera, one body,
any brand, any model, new
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: Professional
My point was anyone who makes a flat statement
like yours simply may not know
what we professionals ~do~ when ~not~ taking
photographs.
Worse, you may
Shel B. wrote:
I recently read an article in which the writer noted which single
camera he'd take with him on a trip around the world. One camera, one
body. We've recently had a few threads in a similar vein, but all
Pentax related. So, I'm curious - if you had one camera, one body,
any
Darryl wrote:
Milwaukee is not much of a Pentax town unless it has changed in the last 9
months. Your best bet is Helix PhotoArts in Dowtown Milwaukee or Mike C's
(can't spell the last name) on Blue Mound Rd. Sometimes Art's in Waukesha has
used stuff.
Crivello's. A salesman there told
Saying that the professional is in the camera is like saying the artist is
in the brush, the cartoonist is in the pencil, the writer is in the word
processor. It ~is not~ the camera. It is the eye and the mind behind the
camera. In the case of the professional, it's an eye for capturing what
Shel,
My choice would be a Canon T90. The reason is that its power source are the
commonly available AA batteries. I would take along a Tamron 35-90 zoom
with the Canon adapter. Also, the adapter that allows the use of my SMC
Takumars on it. I would bring a 150mm SMC Takumar as my tele lens.
Being of a generation that didn't have built-in metering on SLR's, I relied
on an add-on meter to my Honeywell Pentax H-3. When the Spotmatic came out,
I was very happy, but I still kept a separate meter handy. Today, I use a
Gossen meter. I mainly use the incident metering system.
Jim A.
Paul Wendy Beard wrote:
Another thing that struck me was the fact that it appeared to
have a shoe polish can mounted on the front. Further enquiries revealed
that it was in fact the 43mm limited lens.
Was it black?
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go
Rangefinder, but not obliged to be such.
Bigger than 35mm.
Interchangable lenses.
Decent feature set.
Too hard to choose.
Had to narrow it to three options:
(a) Pentax 67II with 55/4, 90/2.8, 300/4
(b) Mamiya 7II with 50/4.5, 80/4, 150/4.5
(c) Linhof with 120 roll back, 90mm, 180mm, 310mm
I get 3-4 e-mail DAILY that contain a bug of some flavor.
I get 2-3 alerts a week from someone passing along info that ranges from
valid, to a bogus hoax that's been making the rounds for the last
decade.
Sometimes, the URL given to learn more about the nasty being described
is simply a site to
I feel really sorry for you, I really do. As I alluded to earlier in the day, I
used to be a professional (not a photographer, but a member of a bona fide
profession), one which is perceived by the general public as being extremely
competitive within its ranks, and very ambitious and obnoxious
i would take my pz1p and tokina 28-70 f2.8. if i couldn't take a shot
with that i wouldn't take it at all. that set up is not that heavy and
that lens would give me the results i wanted.
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I recently read an article in which the writer noted which single
Gee, Mark ... only you would (seriously) analyze a throw away,
humorous, tag line. Methinks you've been working to hard g.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why should I use a meter? What if the darn thing broke on me
when I was out making a photograph? Then what would I do?
-
This
tom wrote:
Paul Wendy Beard wrote:
Another thing that struck me was the fact that it appeared to
have a shoe polish can mounted on the front. Further enquiries revealed
that it was in fact the 43mm limited lens.
Was it black?
Of course. Real professionals do not wear brown shoes.
You pretty much nailed it there...
- Original Message -
From: D. Glenn Arthur Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 2:38 PM
Subject: Professional: meta-discussion
Gosh, I thought professional only meant, its your way
of earning an income, I
Alexander wrote:
The Professionals' Work section (pages 29-86) of the 2000-2001 PENTAX
PHOTO ANNUAL exhibits photographs taken with the following cameras:
Pentax 645/645n -- 17 photographs
Pentax MZ-3 -- 12 photographs
Pentax 67/67 II -- 6
An LX and a few lenses including the LImiteds
Pål
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 5:12 PM
Subject: Around the World With
I recently read an article in which the writer noted which single
Well in the past I used Internet Explorer. Now I use Netscape 6
and Opera (the preferred browser)
Conrad Samuels
Kirstenhof SA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
Does anyone know where I can get an original MX case?
Here in the UK would be good,but don't mind from other countries.
Ian
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
... a late-model Leica M2 with the 35mm Summilux ASPH, the 50mm
Summicron (next to latest edition) and the current 90/2.8 Elmarit.
The M2 because it's fully mechanical, extremely durable, and has frame
lines for the three lenses I'd choose. The 35mm 'lux ASPH for general
shooting wide open,
Yeah ... it's much like Disney World. The Take 'em Out Back and
Shoot 'em ride is very popular, as is the Self Immolating Peasant
Village
Bob Walkden wrote:
And I suggest we go any one of these places:
http://www.worldrevolution.org/WebGuide/Peace/Other/CurrentWars.htm
do they do package
Hi,
bit light on film there, Shel. To go round the world, travelling at
ground level, you're going to have to budget 2 years and at least,
absolute minimum 2,000 rolls of film.
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sunday, July 29, 2001, 8:55:09 PM, you wrote:
... a late-model Leica M2 with
In a message dated 7/29/01 9:58:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It happens (FWIW) to be a N Ftn, 'cause when I first became interested
in photography in the mid- to late-60's, and actually had aspirations to be a
photojournalist, that seemed to be what all the pros
Hi,
more fun: http://www.comebackalive.com/df/index.htm
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sunday, July 29, 2001, 9:02:09 PM, you wrote:
Yeah ... it's much like Disney World. The Take 'em Out Back and
Shoot 'em ride is very popular, as is the Self Immolating Peasant
Village
Bob
In a message dated 7/29/01 11:08:06 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And I will continue to use the 6x7
I'll see you your 67 and raise you my now two-year-old PENTAX 67ll.
I ignore other formats on this list in that the talk is nearly 100% 35 mm.
Thus ~my~ references on
Issue #1:
Why do dilutes of film developer?
How does this reduce grain other characteristics?
Issue #2:
I need to reinstall my Win98 (complete version) but have lost/misplaced
(due to my move from OK to OH) the box, etc. Anyone got a SN to loan me
while I look for the
In a message dated 7/29/01 11:10:22 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Depends on the type of photography. Enter BDSM
into google for examples of what Mafud is
talking about.
It's the dust in your ears and your clouded corneas which won't let you see
or hear what I write.
In a message dated 7/29/01 11:08:25 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I was calling fuzzy was not the build of a pro camera.
What's _fuzzy_ are the boundaries of who counts as a pro or what kinds of
pro do we mean when we discuss cameras used by profesionals.
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gee, Mark ... only you would (seriously) analyze a throw away,
humorous, tag line. Methinks you've been working to hard g.
One right back atcha
Mark Dalal
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contrast is like crack!
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss
In a message dated 7/29/01 11:16:08 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, I'm curious - if you had one camera, one body,
any brand, any model, new or old - which would it be, and why? If you
care to mention which lenses you'd take, that's fine too.
Canon EOS 1n-RS and
Bob B. wrote:
Saying that the professional is in the camera is like saying the artist is
in the brush, the cartoonist is in the pencil, the writer is in the word
processor. It ~is not~ the camera. It is the eye and the mind behind the
camera. In the case of the professional, it's an eye for
would like to see your pictures from brussels, bob.
looks like you had a good day over there.
anand
From: Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Brussels
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 15:57:36 +0100
Hi,
had my day trip to Brussles yesterday, and
In a message dated 7/29/01 11:18:19 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For the record, I think this is a load of horse droppings.
I have seen more pro photographers who don't know what the hell they are
doing out there ruining peoples weddings, and taking bad portraits than
Actually, one is only a pro if one does magazine photography.
When the last magazine folds there will be no more pros in the
occupation.
You portrait and wedding photographers are not professionals,
nor are commercial or industrial photographers. And, as for
those artsie craftsie photographers,
That's funny. FWITW, I don't consider any current Canon to be a
professional camera because they don't have interchangable
viewfinders.
But then, I am old fasioned, it used to be that two things made
a camera suitable for professional use.
One, the ruggednest to stand up to day by day
This, of course, proves my response to William Robbs earlier
post is correct.
BTW, Mikes definition comes directly from the ASMP a magazine
photographers trade union (only they call it a Professional
Association). Well, you have to be a member of a PA to be
considered a professional (by PAs),
In a message dated 7/29/01 11:31:59 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
his puffing of male egos is ridiculous. Mafud, let's see some of
your work. I don't believe you've ever contributed to the PUG
gallery, nor have you ever posted a photo, or a URL to a photo, that
Maybe if its the same batch of film then there is something wrong with the
cartridge which is causing some resistance which the camera thinks is the
end of the film.
If both these films were from the same batch, then maybe try and totally
different film.
Just a guess :)
- Original Message
In a message dated 7/29/01 11:31:59 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'll take a Leica M2, a couple of lenses, and whip both your butts.
Probably, but by your statement, haven't ~you~ also joined in the macho
talk?
Shame on you!
-
This message is from the
have fun!
come with lot of pictures !!
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Lying on the dock and soaking up sun for a living
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 11:53:06 -0500
And now, I'm off to become a professional vacationer. See you in a
In a message dated 7/29/01 11:45:30 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And it's likely to be much worse if you go into it with a defensive or
confrontative attitude, where you assume that competition means animosity.
I'm sure this is often the case, as most people have very
For those interested in the performance of this lens, I have added a couple
of pictures taken with it to my website. These are the last two under the
category People and Places, at
http://ca.geocities.com/spirope/photopage.htm
The first of these, showing the Divinity School at Oxford
In a message dated 7/29/01 6:18:25 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can I count on you for this??
Yes, snide one.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
Jeeez guys. let it die
It's getting so that grease spot that used to be a dead horse is nearly
gone.
Like many, I am a Master and an accredited Journeyman at some other
vocation (making photography my avocation?).
When doing work within my vocation, if I use a tool that isn't rated as
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
Shel asks:
one body, any brand, any model, new
or old - which would it be, and why?
This will have to be a close call between Rita Hayworth...
A good choice, although I was thinking Marilyn Monroe myself, before
deciding not to rise to the bait of this question.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I never will contribute to the PUG. That said, I'm in the process of
loading
web pages with my PJ and self-indulgent work.
But what makes you think I'd ever involve myself in you show me yours,
I'll
show you mine endeavors?
erhhmmm - credibility SOMETHING to
In a message dated 7/29/01 6:16:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, rather than continuing the lets see
who is stupid enough to piss into the wind
contest,
But..but, ~you~ started the contest.
Besides, I'm still learning the 67ll ~and~ how to shoot medium
In a message dated 7/29/01 6:10:33 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That would be some urban legend, the F3 was
introduced in 1980, fully 5 years after the
Americans evacuated Saigon in 1975.
Parsing minutiae are we? Unlike you, I've never, ~ever~ ~held~ a Nikon, so
- Original Message -
From: petit miam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: Professional
Yes, that doesn't sound very professional.
And while we're at it, I resent being compared
to a
prostitute. I have an annual licence, a
On Sun, 29 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your shop is neutral territory, a place where civility ~can~ rein. But
the competition for contracts among wedding newbies with new
autofocus cameras is ~not~ nice, not ~anywhere~.
Hi, Mafud. I see what you're saying, and I think it's applicable
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: Professional: meta-discussion
In a message dated 7/29/01 6:10:33 PM Eastern
Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That would be some urban legend, the F3 was
Collin wrote;
As always, I'm looking at the shot mostly for
pleasure, with just a few
critiques.
snip
Approaching Storm by William Johnson
A pleasant piece of menacing weather.
Thanks Collin,
William in Utah.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: Professional
In a message dated 7/29/01 6:16:07 PM Eastern
Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, rather than continuing the lets see
who is stupid enough to piss into the wind
Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shel B. wrote:
So, I'm curious - if you had one camera, one body,
any brand, any model, new or old - which would it be, and
why? If you
care to mention which lenses you'd take, that's fine too.
Shel,
Somebody posed this question to me a year
On Sunday, July 29, 2001 3:35 PM, William Robb [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Greetings:
I am wondering what browsers people are using for viewing the PUG. If you
would kindly click
here
and tell me what version of which browser you are using,
I would be most appreciative.
Thanks
William
Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
I cannot agree more.
An M4p or an M3 could be good too,
the only problem is they are
meterless.
Why is that a problem? (HAR!)
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why should I use a meter? What if the darn thing broke on me
when I was out making a
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: Professional
In a message dated 7/29/01 6:18:25 PM Eastern
Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can I count on you for this??
Yes, snide one.
Thank you
Hi everyone,
I have a Pentax P3n that has developed a problem with
the aperture feedback lever (as far as I can tell).
If I let the camera sit a few days, then the meter
will act erracticaly when I start using it again,
unless I move the aperture ring back and forth a few
times. If it sits
Wrong, TR.
Real photographs use sheet film. Pro or amateur. G
It's more important to be a photographer than a professional.
Isn't that what this list/gallery is all about?
Collin
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 16:45:15 -0400
From: Tom Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, one is only a pro if
You could go the luxe route and get a nice 85mm f/2.3 Soft Focus (K-Mount)
that is quite nice and offers variable sharpness.
See
http://whitemetal.com/kids_10_2000/tom_face_03a.jpg
http://whitemetal.com/kids_10_2000/tom_pumpkin_02.jpg
You could seek out a Kenko Soft-Cross for a nice
There is a lot of wisdom that says this lense suffers from distortion.
Having said that, I believe that the distortion present is only going to be
objectionable when you photograph graph paper or a scene that has horizontal
and vertical lines that are prominent, off-center, and expected to be
A true and similar matter occurred back in Oklahoma
when I first got into computer retailing.
The HP calc rep and the TI calc rep were both out
at Tinker AFB, hawking their wares. The TI had all
of the needed features that the HP had. But to make
the sale, the TI rep, armed with HP 41, extended
You are dating yourself there :) Christmas '75 - don't
remember that one, and not because of what I was
drinking (I was on a breastmilk diet at the time).
Just out of curiosity - which camera took the photo,
the ?Leica or the Spotmatic, or perhaps some unseen
camera in the background?
Jody.
---
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
