Hi all,
I plan to use these to supplement my existing 49mm filters. I have 11, + an
original (mint) Asahi Pentax Polarizing Filter.
Hoya Y(K2), Orange (G), Green (x1), Red (25A), Spare Skylight (1A)+(1B),
Hoya 81A and 82A, Diffuser, Cross screen, PL.
Apart from the Asahi Pentax PL which I was gi
on 04/28/02 17:52, Nick Wright opined:
> I could not afford that 500 at that time, I knew that I did not
> want another 280t since I could not get them repaired.
I've had two repaired by Pentax Colorado in the past year. Replaced the guts
for about $90, if I remember correctly. Of course, someon
With no film in the camera, you cannot advance the film lever. It is
uncoupled. Reason is that once you load film, and line up the arrow on the
backing paper with the appropriate 120 or 220 designator, and close the
back, the advace lever does not cock the shutter until you arrive at Frame
#1. Not
Thanks Ken, Nitin and everyone for the input - I found some 76A's at my
local lab.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
On Sunday, April 28, 2002 10:27 PM, Ken Archer
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Take your pick:
> 357, Type J, 228, 10L14, Rw22, RW42, G-13, G-13F, WL14, SR44W, 7,
541,
>
> 8008
At 19:27 28.4.2002 -0400, Shel wrote:
>I don't think there's anything that can be done about it. I don't think
>I ever encountered the problem, but, in all honesty, I rarely, if ever,
>photograph the sky. I tend to keep my cameras focused on more
>earth-bound subjects. What's up there that's so i
Hi !
Try Sigma 500 Super , I think it`s good alternative to FTZ 500
Regards , Raivo
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
On Friday, April 26, 2002 9:29 PM, Evan Hanson
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I live in the flight path of a local Air Reserve Base, so I've
> become accustomed to seeing large planes skim over the tree
> tops. Last night however, I missed a great photo opportunity
> because I had left my cam
or maybe it's Sod's law! So I bought this ESII yesterday real cheap,
and today I find my MZ-5 no longer wants to autofocus, and the repair
shop tells me it's a A$350-400 job. The day before that my daughter
tells me the video camera is also sick, and it's going to cost me to
get that fixed to
At 18:56 27.4.2002 -0600, you wrote:
>> What's wrong with the M28/2.8?
>
>I still haven't figured that one out yet, and I have the really
>bad one with the chromey racing stripe.
>Perhaps it isn't razor sharp wide open.
>
>William Robb
I have the A 28/2.8 and at least mine is pretty good. (Bough
At 21:06 28.4.2002 -0400, Andre wrote:
>> >Where did you learn that? [K18/3.5 actually being
>>19mm] Mine seems awfully wide
>>
>>It was right here on PDML last week (sorry, I havenít
>>gotten to know the posters on a first name basis so I
>>canít give credit here).
>
>I git it from Modern Pho
Hi Brendan ...
All the more reason to have taken the picture, and, since you were
unsure about how to compensate, a perfect time to bracket. It would
have been a good learning experience as well as a flare test for the
lens .
Which body were you using and what was the metering mode, if your cam
Wheatfield wrote:
> Unfortunately, the Russian M49x0.75 thread size is not
> compatable with the industry standard M49x1.0 that is used by
> the camera manufacturers.
> Ah well, you can always get your lenses rethreaded.
Duct Tape to the Rescue
... or a wide rubber band
I didn't take the pic, there was glare on the building
that caused the
cameras meter to jump to that reading and I'm not
experienced enough
to know how I should have compensated, I just don't
shoot if I see
sun glare. I did snap another one on the old Molsen
building in B&W
reflected off the Allia
- Original Message -
From: Pat White
Subject: Re: The old digital/film debate
> I thought that with wedding photos, the customer has the
copyright, unless he signs an agreement granting the right to
the photographer.
That seems to depend on what country you are in.
William Robb
-
This
On 28 Apr 2002 at 23:01, Mishka wrote:
> Rob,
> See, you are assuming that there's an a priori knowledge of who is the owner an
> who infringes. Although it is often true in case of software, books and music, I
> think it is more vague in case of photographs. There're no negatives, just two
> (al
- Original Message -
From: James Adams
Subject: M49 Filters for Pentax
> I just saw this on Ebay, and opted to BIN for $24
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1349523214
>
> 8 Russian M49 Filters..
> yellow-1.4x; yellow-2x, yellow-green-1.4x; yellow-green-2x;
Orange-
>I just saw this on Ebay, and opted to BIN for $24
>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1349523214
>
>8 Russian M49 Filters..
>yellow-1.4x; yellow-2x, yellow-green-1.4x; yellow-green-2x; Orange-2.8x;
blue-1.4x; br> red-8x, dark-4x.
They have 2 types of yellow-green (1.4X and 2X
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re[2]: The old digital/film debate
> I'm starting to feel like the days of charging by the print
are
> changing. It used to be that the labor cost was buried inside
of the
> cost of the resulting prints. Because of the ease of
duplicatio
I just saw this on Ebay, and opted to BIN for $24
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1349523214
8 Russian M49 Filters..
yellow-1.4x; yellow-2x, yellow-green-1.4x; yellow-green-2x; Orange-2.8x;
blue-1.4x; br> red-8x, dark-4x.
Having just priced the filters locally after decidin
I thought that with wedding photos, the customer has the copyright, unless he signs an
agreement granting the right to the photographer.
As for copying, wedding and sports photographers here in Victoria stress that they
don't give out proofs anymore. They either print up a digital 'contact s
Brendan said:
> I hit F22 and 1/4000 just last
> week once trying to get the CN
> tower's refelction in another building,
> the film was 200 kodak gold.>>
This makes no sense at all. Using the "Sunny 16" rule, the vase
exposure would have been 1/250 @ f16.0. Figuring some added brightness,
ad
Was the exposure actualy correct though?
> I hit F22 and 1/4000 just last
> week once trying
> to get the CN tower's refelction in another building,
> the film was 200
> kodak gold.>>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the di
Guys: what speed of film are you using. It really should not be an issue if
you're using a slow speed, high saturation film. 100asa or less...
In a message dated 4/28/02 11:49:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http:/
I doubt you really even got F22 at 2000 of a second. Chances are the
reflection from the snow was throwing your meter off and you really needed to
open up 2 or 3 stops to hold the whites in the snow. I'll bet you got blue
snow or difficult to print negs. It's extemely rare in nature that there
In a message dated 4/28/02 10:57:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That goes without saying. Anyone serious about photography should not bother
with this fast film. A good 400 speed film is as fast as you need to go, even
with that you're giving up colour and sharpness.
<<> Has anyone tried this
If you can shoot at f22, either increase your shutter speed or decrease your
film speed. I don't believe I have ever had to shoot at f22...
In a message dated 4/28/02 10:38:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
< wrote:
Why would you want to use 1/22 in the first place? I am just curious.>>
-
This m
Rob,
See, you are assuming that there's an a priori knowledge of who is the owner
an who infringes. Although it is often true in case of software, books and
music, I think it is more vague in case of photographs. There're no
negatives, just two (almost) identical image files. If I am an abuser, I
On 28 Apr 2002 at 22:11, Mishka wrote:
> Whatever you "hide" into your image, unless it is showing on the print, it
> can be removed simply by re-JPEG-ing it. And if it does show on a print, it is
> not hidden. As far as the image tags are concerned, *anyone* can overwrite them.
> If your custome
Put it on a Pacemaker Graphic lensboard and send it to me for testing.
Nice catch, Bill.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTE
Yep ... don't do that .
I don't think there's anything that can be done about it. I don't think
I ever encountered the problem, but, in all honesty, I rarely, if ever,
photograph the sky. I tend to keep my cameras focused on more
earth-bound subjects. What's up there that's so interesting, anywa
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 10:11:59PM -0400, Mishka wrote:
> Whatever you "hide" into your image, unless it is showing on the print, it
> can be removed simply by re-JPEG-ing it.
Digital watermarking is more involved then that. Simple re-JPEG-ing
(like the sound of it :)) wont work without degrading
Put a roll of film in the camera. The 6x7 shutter won't fire unless
there is film in the camera. There's a workaround, but you ought to just
try running a roll through it, and see how the transport mechanism and
shutter perform.
Paul
William Kane wrote:
>
> Ok,
>
>Here's the 'update' on my
Nice buy. It should make a great landscape lens on the 4x5. I'm jealous.
Paul
William Robb wrote:
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1347280318
>
> William Robb
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow t
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 10:28:28AM +1000, Rob Studdert wrote:
>
> One interesting exclusion in the current crop of digital cameras is that even
> though they write all manner of information into the file at the time of
> capture none provide an option for the camera owner/authors name to be emb
>The biggest issue with the NiCd packs is not overcharging (a full
>charge is 16 hours)
Other post says 6 to 10 hours. 16 would be a max ?
>but with having to wait until they are dead to recharge them, or
>rigging a device to discharge them before you charge them.
Because of "memory building
The AF500FTZ is by far the best flash for the money. If you spend the little
extra for it, you will not be dissapointed. I remember seeing someone on the
list selling their's for about $210 if I'm not mistaken in the last few
days. But to be fair, the first flash that I had for my pz1p was the old
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: The old digital/film debate
> On 28 Apr 2002 at 17:20, William Robb wrote:
>
> > One issue that comes to mind for me is copyright. If the
> > photographer cannot produce an original negative to prove
> > ownership, can he enforce copyr
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Latest Acquisition
> Hey, that's Super! And you got it from Grimes, too. He's the
man!
>
> Good catch, Mr. Wheatfield.
Thanks Shel. When I saw it was Grimes selling it, I couldn't
help myself.
Bill
-
This message is from the Pentax
Bruce, you're right, the dogs are eating it -
I'd really like to see what sort of 30 x 40 this couple is getting (mainly
because I wouldn't want a 30 x 40 hanging anywhere in my place... but I'm
sure this may be the preferrence for some folk) because, unless they're
using Genuine Fractals and 6mp
On 28 Apr 2002 at 17:20, William Robb wrote:
> One issue that comes to mind for me is copyright. If the
> photographer cannot produce an original negative to prove
> ownership, can he enforce copyright on the image?
Hi Bill,
Interesting question. I figure that firstly information including the
Hi,
Thanks for everyones suggestions, i now have a few ideas to work with.
Regards,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Ewins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: Light Proofing a Darkroom.
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm after some tips
Looking for recommendations for a general purpose flash for PZ-1p.
I guess AF500FTZ would be best but I wouldn't mind spending less.
Is there something wrong with the 400FTZ ? I see several for sale at KEH.
3rd party units? Sunpak, Sigma?
Thanks
Tim
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Hey, that's Super! And you got it from Grimes, too. He's the man!
Good catch, Mr. Wheatfield.
William Robb wrote:
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1347280318
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
http://home.earthlink.net/~beli
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1347280318
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
While out photographing this afternoon my trusty electronic helper
sniped the high bid on a LN 35mm Negatrans for the Beselers ... neat!
This'll speed up the making of proof prints, and will be a fine
compliment to the medium format Negatrans that came along with the
dichro enlarger. Next up, a
- Original Message -
From: Mark Erickson
Subject: Re: The old digital/film debate
> I think the wedding photographer comments below say a lot
about their
> previous MF workflow. I've seen showcase Lightjet prints that
originated
> as 35mm chromes, medium format chromes, large format chr
I think the wedding photographer comments below say a lot about their
previous MF workflow. I've seen showcase Lightjet prints that originated
as 35mm chromes, medium format chromes, large format chromes, and
Nikon D1x direct digital captures. If they're done right, images sourced
from medium fo
Jonathan,
There are other 17 and 18mm choices out there:
1. Ricoh made an XR Rikenon 18/2.8. A couple months ago one was on German
EBay. It sold March 10 to a European PDMLer for just 156 Euros (about
$120). It resembles the Pentax 18/3.5 but uses a 67mm filter (vs. 58). I
have a photo of it;
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> Nope, you saw one with a metering prism on it. You have to turn it on,
> I think. Dunno, I don't have one. Another giveaway is that it sticks
> out on the left, over the shutter speed dial. The non-metering prism
> does not, and makes the camera app
I just got off the phone talking to my wife who is out to Utah
attending a couple of weddings. She told me that the one she went to
last night was shot by a husband/wife team. They have gone fully
digital and are selling off their film gear. They told her that they
have blown up to 30 X 40 and
Aaargh!
Get a nice new toy in - and it bloody disappears before I have a chance to
play.
Gone - Arsat 300mm F2.8. Gone - Helios 85mm F1.5. Gone - Cokin Creative flash.
I hate my job.:)
Just in today, another 35mm F2M, even nicer,
and a 100mm F4 Bellows Lens boxed with case (minty).
Sunday, April 28, 2002, 8:21:23 PM, William wrote:
WR> - Original Message -
WR> From: Mishka
WR> Subject: Re: Why some need f/22 (was: Re: Thanks Ultra-Wide
WR> Anglers! (Now a few more questions...)
>> now that i think about it, i remeber i needed that a few
WR> times.
>> once was last
Alberto,
I am sure you have read up on this, but if you shoot lots with
flash and ambient combined, the PZ-1 cannot do the easy flash
compensation of PZ-1p.
Just a note.
Frantisek
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Sunday, April 28, 2002, 6:19:33 PM, Mishka wrote:
M> Thanks Paul,
M> That didn't occur to me. Seriously.
M> I thought more along the DOF line, and 20mm should have everything in focus
M> way before f/22.
With the F/Calc, I computed, using a circle of confusion for APS film
size (because the COC f
Jonathan Donald wrote:
>The 18/3.5 isn't really that poor
Anyway, I
recommend the 18/3.5. A drawback for some will be the
very warm color rendition.
Is it possible that this is a sample variation? Have
other owners noticed this? One poster on Stans lens
comment site said it was identical t
33 attempts and 25 usable prints later I just stripped
the locking
screw on the Omega B-22. The screw was already on it's
way out and
I've been told it was a common weak part but it broke
just as I was
ready to print one of the best pics I took during
Stan's TPDML
visit. Just plain bad timing on i
Brand new Winder MX in box for the equivalent of $70. I love it already - it
came in handy during photographing children feeding an elaphant in a circus.
Łukasz
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget t
David.I sent you a mail,did you get it.Id be interested.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "David Chang-Sang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:27 PM
Subject: FS: 28mm Super Takumar f3.5 M42 / Screw Mount
> Well..
>
> Before I drop this puppy up on
Butch Black wrote:
>
>
> "The ultimate form of human maturity is a willingness to take complete
> responsibility for oneself" (United consumers club)
>
I don't know about the rest of you, but the writings of the United
Consumers Club have long served as a source of inspiration for me
Paul
-
Th
Actually when i could not find RG1000 for the indoor show last weekend,i
bought a roll of Fuji 1600.All iin all,i was impressed.They were of obvious
quality thet low light would bring but i showed them to Aaron and he thought
the grain was not to harsh.
These are just for the kids to see their goo
Thanks for that info.I have ordered one and hope to have it soon.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Andreas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 12:45 PM
Subject: Epson 1650
> Hi,
>
> for those who are interested in buying a flatbed scanner for slid
No,sorry Jeff,Henrys downtown.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: RE: Vivitar Series I, 19-35.
> You mean Downtown camera?
> I'll give them a try
>
> Jeff
>
> - Original Message ---
Forgive me if I wax philosophical.
One of the (IMHO) problems with society today is a lack of civilization. We
are not becoming a "kinder gentler" world, even though we have the means and
communications to do so. Rather, we are becoming less sensitive to the needs
and comfort of those around us.
I agree with everything Cotty said: an excellent day, and thanks for sharing it with
us. You didn't let the Nikon girl get away, did you?
Pat White
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit t
I might get the name wrong. What i meant is the effect you get when you set
a really long exposure (1s+) and get the water washed out (kinda like a
veil) rather than stopped in action. I rarely have film slower than 100 and
often even that is too fast if I want to have a reasonable (>1/8) aperture
>Can't say for A,
>Why would you want to use 1/22 in the first place? I
am just curious.
I know that f22 sounds like an overkill, (especially
with wide angle lenses), but I frequently use every
inch of the DOF available to me. I am a botanist, and
I like to make environmental portraits of very s
I have this filter now. Didn't have then. But I agree that this is a much
better option than stopping down that much.
And as for the slower film -- it was a cloudy day and the only roll I had
was the one (400) in my camera.
> > now that i think about it, i remeber i needed that a few times.
> > o
T Rittenhouse wrote:
>
> I think that it is only common courtesy not to step in someone else's
> puddle. If you are not interested leave it alone. (small snip)
> The two exceptions are:
> 1. If you are the seller, and a regular member of this list. (If you don't
> contribute here, but just sign
Saturday, April 27, 2002, 7:00:35 PM, Mark wrote:
ME> Here's a question for you Old lens--new body. Who's put together pieces
ME> with the largest age difference?
I am sure it can be beaten, but I have an early post-war Zeiss Jena
(Olympia) Sonnar, converted to K-mount, on my LX (3rd gen).
Sunday, April 28, 2002, 8:28:03 AM, wayne wrote:
wwaprhm> i haVE a zeiss 28mm f2.8 lens for pentax and the image quality is awesome is
wwaprhm> thjere other zeiss lenses available for pentax
None. And none at all.
Sorry to disappoint you (but you shouldn't be since the *image
quality* is awesome
- Original Message -
From: Mishka
Subject: Re: Why some need f/22 (was: Re: Thanks Ultra-Wide
Anglers! (Now a few more questions...)
> now that i think about it, i remeber i needed that a few
times.
> once was last year when i was trying to shoot a waterfall and
wanted to get
> a "brides
On Saturday, April 27, 2002, at 03:58 PM, frank theriault wrote:
>
> Better check with Aaron. He told me earlier in the week that he's
> starting
> "summer hours" this weekend, meaning "closed most Sundays". I guess
> now that
> the Sheridan students are gone for the summer, there's only us p
On Saturday, April 27, 2002, at 03:53 PM, Jeff wrote:
> Yea, that could be just as painful.
> Aaron didn't feel sorry about your cat? Bummer.
Hey now! It was tough for me, cuz Dave had downright adorable pictures
of him.
Poor kitty, looked like my mom & dad's cats.
-Aaron
-
This message is
On Friday, April 26, 2002, at 06:20 PM, Steve Larson wrote:
> Does that person start with "M"?
s, don't say his name. It's like the Scottish play thing.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
On Friday, April 26, 2002, at 11:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Speaking of negative and slide scanners, the price Club here in Canada
> has a
> line in stock I never heard of for only $199. Cdn. For you Americans
> that's
> pretty damn cheap. The box says it has a 4.2 dmax. Not bad
Wh
On Saturday, April 27, 2002, at 04:12 PM, David Chang-Sang wrote:
> I may trip out that way tomorrow afternoon (if I get time) because I'm
> hunting for the same equipment :)
Summer hours: closed on Sunday. Sorry, man, I'm catching up on my
sleep. I did make a rare Saturday appearance today,
On Saturday, April 27, 2002, at 12:36 AM, Fred wrote:
> But I LOVE those little buttons...
Me too!
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.kom
Alberto,
Viewfinders in the PZ-1 and PZ-1p look identical. I cannot notice the 1/2
stop difference in screen brightness. In addition, I've used the brighter
screen PZ-1p in the PZ-1 and had difficulties seeing any different results
with slides.
Some say that the PZ-1 exposes best for slid
> Now, something that you haven't mentioned that I find as a more
> usable combination is the F 17-35 fisheye and one of the 20's.
> The fisheye zoom is unique in that it zooms from almost 180
> degrees to almost the same focal length of the 20mm rectilinear.
> At the 35mm end, it is about the sa
if the dof is not important, one can also use a filter to slow down the
shutter further if one doesn not have issues about using a filter :)
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 09:54:29AM -0400, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> What's that? Could you not use a slower film?
>
> Mishka wrote:
>
> > a "b
William Robb wrote: In general, the K lenses are mechanically smoother
than A
> lenses, and optically better than M lenses.
Yep. Someone--Shel?--reported last year that many M lenses replaced the K's
brass with aluminum, affecting smoothness of focus, especially in cold
weather.
Paul Fran
I own a PZ-1p
Now I need a backup body and the shop here in my town has a used PZ-1 for
sale.
Should I buy it, or should I look for another PZ-1p ?
I don't know exactly the differences between the two bodies, but mainly I'm
interested in the viewfinder. I read somewhere that screens of PZ-1 are
di
So sorry to hear about your cat, Dave. My thoughts are with you.
--Amita
> Sorry to bother everyone,just a little down
> today.My favorite Cat,my best portrait subject
> and "Little Buddy" lost a battle with a car
> last night.
> He'll be sorely missed in this house hold.
>
> Dave
>
> http:
Mine has the fg grip. I liked the MZ-M at first cause
i was so small
but once I got longer lenses I soon found I wanted a
bit more weight
nas size to the camera.
--- David Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brendan.Did you put a grip on yours,or do they
> come with one.Thats why i backed off on
Hi Jonathan,
Have you considered the Pentax FA 20mm 2.8, I have one
and it's an awesome lens?
I hate to ask you this question, but here goes, Why
get a great, expensive , sharp Ultra Wide, then put a
plastic filter in front of it?
Sincerely,
Ryan
>Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 21:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
I used to use this several years ago. I found it OK for
a high-speed color film, basicly due to its "Kodak color
palatte" rather than any grain-fineness issues. It is a
rather grainy film. I tended to shoot it at 800asa (+1/3rd)
to assure good saturation. Ho
I have to agree with Shel here. Some people deal with death with a sort of
"black humour". I do sometimes as well, but I make sure that my "audience"
knows where I'm coming from, and that they share or at least understand my
perspective. That's pretty hard to do on a list like this, so I don't
On 27 Apr 2002 at 21:22, Jonathan Donald wrote:
> #1)I was inspired to save up and hold out (look
> harder?) for a Pentax K18/3.5 until I learned its true
> focal length of 19mm. That seems so close to 20mm,
> that I might as well just get the A20/2.8 which is
> [somewhat] cheaper, easier to find
Let's be honest, Paul - *you* think Rainbow Bridge is over the top.
Many people find it warm and touching. To poke fun of someone's
sadness, or how they deal with grief or that sadness, is, as Mishka
said, insensitive, and in so saying he/she/it knew it might offend or
upset some people.
Rainbo
On 28 Apr 2002 at 3:46, Alexander Krohe wrote:
> Depending on the price range, the built quality of the
> A-lenses differ. Cheaper lenses (e.g. the A28/2) have
> plastic barrels while the more expensive ones have
> metal all-barrels. IMO there is not much difference in
> the built quality between
William Robb wrote:
> Does anyone ever snipe when there's no bids on an item??
Absolutely! Someone on the list recently published a URL to a study
confirming that once a first bid has been placed, an item will draw more
bidders. I've found this to be true, and for this reason often lurk until
Mishka's comment about the rainbow bridge did make me smile. I think it
was only offered in jest. Let's be honest, "the rainbow bridge" is a wee
bit over the top. A bit of levity in response was not totally
inappropriate or insensitive.
Paul
Ken Archer wrote:
>
> Yeah and she didn't take long on
Brendan.Did you put a grip on yours,or do they
come with one.Thats why i backed off on the
5n,felt to small.
Dave
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj
Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
-
This message is from the Pentax-D
Subject: Re: I WON!!! at Ebay
- - Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: I WON!!! at Ebay
> Does anyone ever snipe when there's no bids on an item??
>
As much as I hate to have to admit it, I've taken to sniping in almost every
situation. I'd lost a couple of things that I re
Duracell #303/357 should do it.Also replaces
the LR44.The are not expensive,usually under
$3.00 Can at Home Depot
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Nitin Garg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S76, LR44,.. the list of compatible battery is
long :)
Just take the one you took to store and ask for
Cotty,i think he said it was 28702.8
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PS Did you get the cute nikon girl's number?? ;-
)
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj
Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/Ca
This is so beautiful it made me cry. Thank you for posting these comforting
words. It's so sad to lose a beloved pet.
My condolences to Dave and his family on their loss of Buddy. I lost my cat,
Gus, a couple of years ago at age 2 due to a congenital kidney problem. But
then, along came
Take your pick:
357, Type J, 228, 10L14, Rw22, RW42, G-13, G-13F, WL14, SR44W, 7, 541,
8008, D76, EPX76, F76, 576, GP76, MS76H. RS76, K576.
On Sunday 28 April 2002 03:53 am, John Coyle wrote:
> Picked an ESII in not bad condition today, for A$55 including an SMC
> 50/1,4 and a Vivitar 2x conver
Yeah and she didn't take long on the list to make my kill file as well.
On Saturday 27 April 2002 10:33 pm, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> If you don't want to seem insensitive, don't post insensitive
> comments ... you come across as a real jerk (I didn't want to appear
> insensitive, but I had to tell
I've been using the HP ScanJet 5470 for a number of months now, and I really
like the scans. It does a good job on slides and negatives 2400 x 2400, and
for a relatively inexpensive scanner (less than $300), I think it does an
awesome job.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
