In a message dated 29/04/02 23:25:23 GMT Daylight Time, Cesar writes:
<< Peter,
Try http://cameraleather.com which is their main page. Or try
http://cameraleather.com/pentax/ for Pentax specific information.
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
>>
Cesar - you the man. Oh yes.
Kr
Pete
Frantisek
Power Pack M is the large transformer with a-plenty of tactile toggle
switches, and large interval timer knob in the centre. I am on the trail of
one as we speak.
It's a lovely thing - would have looked great on our stand at Photographica -
unfortunately someone purchased it.
We
BTW I see that in Japan the A* 1200/8 cost only 10% more than the FA*
600/4. At least around here the price difference is much larger.
It seems to cost $8500 in Japan. Not too bad relatively speaking.
Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.p
Back from a wonderful excursion to Venice where I shot 7 rolls of 120 in
two daysthink it's a record for me. You can burn film there at a
furious pace...
Norm
William Robb wrote:
> From: Norman Baugher
> > Who cares, I like the first one... :-)
> > Norm
>
> Oh God, Norm's awake again.
> WW
-
>Does anyone of you UK PDML:ers happen to know whether there are any
>free to use pictures of St James Palace and/or the Portland Hotel (as
>in 1920), London, big enough for use in a newspaper article?
>
>Is there still a Portland Hotel around for that matter?
Hey Lasse,
I put a search in for Po
Like Rob comments at the end of Tom's quote, I ship for the postage...$3.80
(or so) priority mail cost in the US. This is a hobby. I have peanuts and
other packing material coming out my ears. And the post office is 2 blocks
out of the way on my way to work. I don't want to take another $10
On Saturday, April 27, 2002, at 08:56 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
>> What's wrong with the M28/2.8?
>
> I still haven't figured that one out yet, and I have the really
> bad one with the chromey racing stripe.
> Perhaps it isn't razor sharp wide open.
How many M28mm f2.8s are there? I've seen two
Shel, I'll also suggest Ilford's warmtone offerings. They have a whiter
base than Portriga Rapid, but not pure white.
Has Portriga Rapid been discontinued now? Last I heard, Agfa Canada
just wasn't importing it in quantities under a case, which is a lot of
paper.
-Aaron
-
This message is fr
Shel Belinkoff
How much film do you carry when out shooting just for the day or a few
hours? This question was prompted by someone on the list mentioning
that s/he went out with only one roll of fast film in the camera.
So, what do you carry for a typical, enjoyable day with your camera?
--
Sh
Bill,
You're my new best friend!! Wahoo! That did the trick. I
couldn't figure out how to advance the frames, and had some idea that
that might be why it wasn't working properly.
Shutter speeds SOUND as if they are working correctly, so my next
step is obtaining a lens and some film
Taka.I tested a roll of the Optima II 400 a few
weeks back.The blues are SO vivid.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For non-people shots, I am more partial to Agfa Optima II than Fuji or
Kodak. It comes in 100, 200 and 400 speed. You might want to
That's an excellent business explanation of the cost of selling.
For myself, doing things on a (wife, 2 sons, & a mortagage) budget, boxes (for other
than Priority) are also free as they come out of dumpsters behind shoppin centers.
Same with packing peanuts and styrofoam sheets. Some shops t
Sid Barras wrote:
> I pulled out the old screw mount bellows, and an absolutely
> never-been-out-of-the-box-before-now 100mm bellows takumar, my old black
> ES (the one I removed all the paint from and polished the brass then
> lacquered it) and by bogen tripod.
Ah Ha! It was you! Do you still
- Original Message -
From: HUDERER Bernd
Subject: RE: Pre-eBay pre-Friday Pentax sale :-)
> > Pentax SMC A* 100mm/2.8 Macro lens $625
>
> Is it really A* ? Would explain the price. Never heard about
such type.
I have one. Worth every penny that Rob is asking...
William Robb
-
This me
Dave-
About that Agfa Optima II- when you say the blues are vivid,
does the film have a bluish cast to it overall or is it just that
the color saturation is excellent?
Next week, I'll have time to actually go out and shoot some photos
rather than just talking about it over email. :-)
Taka
-
This
In a message dated 30/04/02 12:47:29 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< At 14:22 30.4.2002 +0800, you wrote:
>SMC for Pentax
>T* for Carl Zeiss
>
>Why do N, C or M not use similar name for their lenses?
Just because they are embarassed and would be happier if
everyone would
Hi,
I have a friend who has a Sinclair Spectrum+ 128 (in its box)
plus a bin bag (i.e. at least 100, maybe more than double that)
of games.
Any masochists want to swap it for Pentax gear? If interested,
contact offlist for fuller details.
Ta muchly,
mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Disc
Bill Owens wrote:
> Here is an email a received from my ISP regarding mail blocked by
> passport.ca
[snip]
Bill,
It sounds like your ISP is running an open mail relay (spammers use these
to hide their identity but I won't go into the details), and they've been
blacklisted as a result - as they
I can't believe I was lied to by my geeky friends!
Christian
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 02:43, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 23:23:31 -0400
>
> "Christian Skofteland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 8a. "racecar" is the longest single word palindrome in the English
> > language.
>
> h
Enough
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Everybody in the UK buy Amateur Photographer this week.
You get a free roll of 36 exp Kodak EliteChrome Extra Colour.
7dayshop sells it for £2.15 plus p&p
Jessops selss 10 packs for £22.50 ish (less 10%) ie just over £20
AP costs 1.95 and gives you a free film
I am going to buy 10 copies this w
Optima II is significantly more saturated than the average film on
the blue and red ends of the spectrum. Check:
http://pug.komkon.org/01jul/HereComesTheSun.html
Despite it's good colour balance and fine grain, beware of the poor
antihalation protection of the film. Sharp edges between
http://www.jerryscamera.com/cameras.html
Other goodies, too, but the lenses in the title are the less common finds.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
-
This message is from th
IMO Agfa films have excellent color saturation and the most neutral palette
available
Bill KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "TM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:00 AM
Subject: RE: Re: Film suggestions needed
> Dave-
> Abo
Sid,
You may want to contact Holland Photo ( http://www.hollandphoto.com/ ) here in Austin,
TX. I use them for my Portrait/Wedding photos (negative prints), but they are known
for their Ilfochrome (formerly known as Cibachrome) prints. They do very good work,
but charge accordingly ($$$).
R
Taka,
If processed correctly, it does not have any bluish cast. In fact, I
find that it handles warm, earthy colors very well - reds and browns.
For me, it is probably the closest print film to Velvia. Not quite as
saturated (could be a good thing), but handles contrast much better
and has reas
CBWaters wrote:
> You were AT the Rennsport reunion?!! I felt fortunate
> to have seen it on SPEED :) Would LOVE to see your pictures.
Ditto on the pictures!
Been kicking myself for a year not making that one. So many
historic Porsches at one venue! Speedvision Online (as it
was then called)
William Kane wrote:
> You're my new best friend!! Wahoo! That did the trick.
> I couldn't figure out how to advance the frames, and had some
> idea that that might be why it wasn't working properly.
Cool - sounds like it may be a good, albeit beat-up, one :^)
> Shutter speeds
Hi Taka.No i found the blues(sky) were very vivid,no hue
or colour cast ovet the print.(I found the Fuji Superia
had this about 50% of the time)I also took a few indoor
shots of one of our cats on a blue/red throw rug.The
blue was very deep. There is one outdoor
horse show that is up on a hill,wi
Summit is a bit far for me, a friend of mine was down there recently,
mentioned something
like a 7 hr. drive.
Most of my photos are static paddock photos, I didn't (and still don't)
have a long
enough lens to really take trackside photos- if I had seen that 500mm
screwmount Takumar,
I would have
Just read the manual that comes with the meter. They usually
cover the basics pretty well.
Len
---
- Original Message -
From: "William Kane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:19 PM
Subject: Re: Update on 'dead' 6x7
>Shutter speeds SOUND as
On Sunday, April 28, 2002, at 09:06 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Because of the ease of duplication
> (scanning) and the acceptance of crap by the customer, once they get
> their prints, you will rarely see any more orders. So it might be
> better to charge an hourly rate or at least charge for y
Alin,
I'm curious to know how you found that out. Is it due to what you
have seen in your own images or was that information available
somewhere? I realize that it is hard to tell in small scans the
problem you are describing, but I haven't really noticed it in my
shots.
Do you have some compa
Hi,
My LX is suffering from "knackered shutter magnets" in the argot
of the local technician and must visit Pentax UK for a while.
Never heard of shutter magnet problems with the LX, unlike the
T90 Canon where it is a well known problem. Anyone got an
opinion?
mike
-
This message is from the P
Dumb MF quiry.Does this(prisim) change the camera from
a top view to a '35mm type' of view?
Dave
Subject: Re: Update on 'dead' 6x7
opt for a prisim and maybe a handheld meter.
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj
Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: ht
It's a very fine lens, no doubt about it, however, unless there is a
model I'm not familiar with, the lens is an A100/2.8, not an A*.
William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: HUDERER Bernd
> > > Pentax SMC A* 100mm/2.8 Macro lens $625
> >
> > Is it really A* ? Would expla
David,
Yes it does. There are prisms available for eye level viewing, eye
level viewing with metering or waist level viewing.
Bruce
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 8:23:20 AM, you wrote:
DB> Dumb MF quiry.Does this(prisim) change the camera from
DB> a top view to a '35mm type' of view?
DB> Dave
D
Alin,
Thanks for the lesson. In viewing the image, I can see a softness on
the edge of the mountain, especially near the sun. Do you have any of
the Gold shots for comparison?
I'll go back through my shots (lots of Bryce Canyon) and look for
similar problems and let you know what I find out.
Mark,
>From my understanding, if you don't need or want AF, you could get
alot more glass for the 645. I am not aware of any major advantages
of the N version. Perhaps Tom or one of the other owners could chime
in.
Bruce
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 9:40:31 AM, you wrote:
ME> So, I'm pricing
Alin, Bruce, David-
Thanks all for the info on Agfa Optima II.
For the purpose of shooting motorsports, though, there are no huge
contrasts like you would see shooting landscapes.
How about Fuji Superia X-Tra 100? Portra 160?
I'd like to find a print film with a very fine grain and isn't so
cri
Hey Rob...
Being the lazy type when possible, I have always had my pack assembled by
the battery seller. I initially used NiCd cells for my packs. What I found
was that using the Sanyo 225 mah cells (I think they are same ones you use)
my battery vendor would first shrink the cell columns, and th
It will be a very good unit.
You will not be disappointed, unless you pay
too much. What vintage is it?
A, B, C ... ?
Collin
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Rollei Xenotar
Hi, gang
A guy offers a Rolleiflex with Xenotar 3.5 lens. Is thi
I found an ad for a non-MLU 6x7 with TTL prism (new batteries, as well),
90mm 2.8 ls lens, and caps for $650. Is this reasonable? Is this, better
yet, a good deal? While its a non MLU, it also gets me started down the
path with a leaf shutter lens, as well. He does say there is a ding in the
apex
Taka.
I'm just starting to use the Portra 160 and will
try the 400 soon.My main colours shot are browns,whites and
reds.The Portra seems to handle quite well.Gives a more
natural sky colour,were i found the Optima II gave it a very
deep sea colour.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: "T
Plucking some message out of my backlog...
William in Utah wrote:
> I almost never use program or shutter priority myself, but I love
> aperture priority and generally fine tune exposure with a twist of the
> exposure compensation dial.
That's mostly what I do on the Super Program as well. On
- Original Message -
From: T Rittenhouse
Subject: Re: Canadian Ebayers
> And you are eating the difference, that is nice of you, but it
is not
> realistic to expect others to do so.
Tom, the cost of a cardboard box is perhaps a dollar, if not
free, packing material is effectively free,
I tested the Pentax 24-90 vs the Tamron 24-135. I'd give a very slight edge
to the Pentax for optics, but the extra range of the Tamron is nice. Both
are very good zooms opticallyboth very consistent over the ranges. A
tough choice.
Robert James
In a message dated 4/30/2002 10:11:57 AM
As having used the 645n but not the 645 I can only comment on the former.
The Autofocus was "ok" but I didn't use it that much. I never used the 645n for
landscapes as I would prefer to get a 6x7 or 6x9 to do that plus the fact that I'm not
a big landscape shooter. That being said; the autofo
gfen wrote:
> I found an ad for a non-MLU 6x7 with TTL prism (new batteries, as
> well), 90mm 2.8 ls lens, and caps for $650. Is this reasonable? Is
> this, better yet, a good deal?
Three words: "Jump on it!" Assuming it's not totally beat to hell, and that
it functions properly. From what I've
That is an often asked question on the Rollei list. If they
can't settle it, how would we be able to settle it?
Len
---
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 12:04 PM
Subject: OT: Rollei Xenotar
> Hi, gang
> A guy offers a
Hi Bill ...
Here the Post Office will provide much of the packing and shipping
material for free, and they'll deliver it to your door as well.
Newspaper for wadding and cushioning the item in the box can also be
absolutely free, if not just effectively free. Styrofoam peanuts are
free, too, if
Well "G" (gfen), now we'll have to keep an eye on each other as we madly search
through eBay;-)
In general, related to the three posts copied below...I'm not sure what my needs are
yet -- sort of. What I'm kicking around is wanting to try larger format. I'd started
in photography abo
TM wrote:
> For the purpose of shooting motorsports, though, there are no huge
> contrasts like you would see shooting landscapes.
>
> How about Fuji Superia X-Tra 100? Portra 160?
I've gotten some good results with Superia Reala, depending
on the lighting situation.
Funny you should mention I
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Peifer, William [OCDUS] wrote:
> Three words: "Jump on it!" Assuming it's not totally beat to hell, and that
Well, I emailed him, we'll just have to see what his (why is it I always
assume everyone on the internet is mail? but, anyways..) response is,
then.
I figured it was
I used the 645 for many many months while working for a children's
portraiture outfit last year. I would shoot on average 10-20 per day of 220
film. It stood up to it very well, after about 6-7 months of my using it in
this fashion the shutter started to exhibit odd behaviour. Mainly, the pix
wou
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-one-category.tcl?topic_id=35&category=Pentax%2067&topic_id=35&category=Pentax%2067
http://web.mit.edu/dennis/www/pentax67/lens-info.html
Some links that might help
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Dan Kirsch wrote:
> Well "G" (gfen), now we'll have to keep an eye on each other as we madly search
>through eBay;-)
I thought I was about to leave the race, but evidently someone beat me to
it and offered a down payment on the 6x7 nonMLU I brought up before.
-sigh
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, gfen wrote:
> assume everyone on the internet is mail? but, anyways..) response is,
...is MAIL?
I've been at this job too long.
--
http://www.infotainment.org
"The destructive character is cheerful." - Walter Benjamin
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mai
Hi,
> For example, two or three identical cameras
> with different focal lengths loaded with identical film is an ideal
> method for me, as when I'm photographing I may burn an entire roll or
> more on just one subject, and what I need is not more film choices, but
> more focal lengths, perspecti
Hi,
that's a pity because my prior engagement has been postponed, so I may
go to Photographica instead (unless Force Majeure decides otherwise) and
I was hoping to bump into you. :o(
What time does it start?
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, April 29, 2002, 4:28:21 PM, you wrote:
Hi, Shel.
I've visited the site just after you mentioned it some time ago. I really
like the portraits he does. Do you know exactly which one he uses (planar,
xenotar, xenar, tessar)?
In fact, since I asked, I made some surfing and learned some about 'flexes.
Regards and thanks
AG
PS: The guy as
I used the 645 for landscapes/nature for two years (almost), and was
very happy with it. The light meter behaves very much like any other
center-weight meter (eg. SuperA/ProgramA, P30/P50, etc.). Only one
small inconvenience with the interface: The buttons are too small for
operating with gloves o
Albano,
Just call me Mr. Softie. Here is a link to information from the
Rollei group. Perhaps you'll find it informative.
http://www.acecam.com/message/10264.html
Len (Always happy to do another's homework)
---
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, at 12:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> There are instances where sites are "accidentally" blocked or have been
> fixed; it takes a bit of time to get them taken off the lists. This
> happened to one of my accounts. But I think it's now up to Aaron's ISP
> to
> ex
gfen,
Bruce
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 11:54:32 AM, you wrote:
>snip<
g> I realize now I forgot to ensure something I wanted to check on: the 6x7's
g> prism is mountable on a newer 67, right?
The prisms for the non 67II are all interchangeable. The TTL prism
won't work on the 67II and the
Dan,
The AE Prism II is designated to go with the 67II. There is no AE
Prism I. There is a TTL Prism for non 67II bodies. It is much like
using an old spotmatic. Match needle full averaging. All manual
adjustments.
The AE Prism II on the 67II is much like using an LX. Aperture
Priority or
Stephen wrote:
> Hope you weren't anywhere near the huge eye that wasted La Plata
> on Sunday. Everything OK?
Well, it missed me by several miles[*] _and_ twenty four hours.
*whew* All I had to deal with on the way home Saturday night was
ordinary rain, and by the time of all the Noise And Des
So do I, but to my eyes, the Super Program doesn't do a good job alerting me that I've
turned the dial. I frequently tune out the exposure compensation flasher by mistake
and end up shooting several frames at + or -2. I prefer an arrangement where the
warning flasher is in the same row or colum
- Original Message -
From: "gfen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 1:54 PM
Subject: RE: good deal on a non MLU 6x7?
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Peifer, William [OCDUS] wrote:
> > Three words: "Jump on it!" Assuming it's not totally beat
to hell, and t
Sounds to cheap for me. May have unrevealed problems. Then
again, could be this person just doesn't know the true value.
For a hundred bucks, I wouldn't wait around for a lot of
answers. Buy it.
Len
---
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesd
gfen asked:
>Why is it I always assume everyone on the internet is mail?
and Len replied:
> Perhaps because you are using e-mail. Then again, you probably
> meant "male".
Hi Len,
In the event that he has to pay a WHOLE lot of money on postage and
handling, would that be "fee-mail"?
Bill Pe
Please send the messages to me directly, to not disturb other
members,thanks.
Also, I've not included 110 and digital cameras, just because I started
this way, and I didn't want to change in the middle of the way.
Also, if you already submited and want to add new items, please put clearly
in your
1- You must choose JUST ONE Pentax brand body of any era and format.
2- You must have personal experience with it, no matter if you own it,
owned it, borrowed it, rented it. You must have used it (it's not a wish
list).
3- Again, you must choose JUST ONE.
4- Send the answers OFF-LIST, TO ME, to do
1- You must choose JUST ONE Pentax brand body of any era and format.
2- It must be the body you use most (time, quantity of shots, whatever...)
3- Again, you must choose JUST ONE.
4- Send the answers OFF-LIST, TO ME, to don't disturb list members. I'll
not count votes sent to list.
DISCLAIMER: Fo
Hi Albano ...
Ed Uses a 1954 Rolleiflex 2.8E with, I believe, a Planar lens. His
Rolleiflex TLR can be seen here:
http://www.edkrebs.com/linkspage/links.htm
It's almost fifty years old, and still does a great job of assisting Ed
with his portraits. Even though I've said many times that I prefe
These are the conditions:
1 - You must answer off-list exclusively. On-list votes will not be
included.
2 - You must choose Your Favorite Pentax Lens. ONLY ONE. Yes, ONLY ONE.
3 - It must be original, no third-party allowed.
4 - Primes and zooms.
5 - You must specifiy: Tak, Super Tak, SMC Tak, K,
These are the conditions:
1 - You must answer off-list, right to me.
2 - You must choose your favorite emulsion (35 and 120/220 allowed. Color
and b
and w)
3 - You must choose ONLY ONE (color print OR slide OR b and w, etc).
4 - You must have personal experience with it.
WINNER by now: Tri-X with
Thanks Bill. I needed that. :)
Len
---
- Original Message -
From: "Peifer, William [OCDUS]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 3:32 PM
Subject: RE: good deal on a non MLU 6x7?
> gfen asked:
> >Why is it I always assume everyone on the internet is
You must have got a duff batch then. There is very little difference
between this and E100VS normally. The difference is so marginal that
EBX (extra colour) is actually a much better buy. Besides, this version
dont need to be kept in a fridge.
I use EBX interchangeably with Velvia, when I want
Hello all,
due to bad weather I am back on time to open the May PUG myself.
Thanks Bill for taking care about the loose ends during my rainy holiday.
:))
Thanks for submitting of course.
Cheers
Adelheid
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml
Hi,
a new biography of Bob Capa has recently been published with this
title. I've bought it and started reading it today. So far so good.
There's a BBC radio piece here about it:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/arts/frontrow/frontrow_20020425.shtml
with archive recordings of Henri Cartier-Bresson, C
>Everybody in the UK buy Amateur Photographer this week.
>
>You get a free roll of 36 exp Kodak EliteChrome Extra Colour.
>
>7dayshop sells it for £2.15 plus p&p
>Jessops selss 10 packs for £22.50 ish (less 10%) ie just over £20
>AP costs 1.95 and gives you a free film
>
>I am going to buy 10 copi
I belong to both PDML and LUG (even though I don't own any L*ica equipment
anymore) but someone recently sent this little diddy (sung to the tune of
Madonna's "Like A Virgin") to the LUG - enjoy..
Cheers,
Dave
Leica Virgin:
I made it through autofocus
Somehow I made it through
Didn't know how
Once again Shel comes up with a more considered, a more erudite, a more
user friendly interpretation of exactly what I am thinking about S and H,
or P and P as we say in the UK.
What the man said!
Cotty
eBay ID 'macads'
>I agree that charging a lot extra for "handling" may be considered to
I was watching it, but I already have one in K-mount, so didn't really need
the screw mount . . .
IB
Ken Archer wrote:
> This one has to go to work occasionally. ;-(
>
> On Monday 29 April 2002 07:30 pm, ?ukasz Kacperczyk wrote:
> > Even I would have bought it!
> > Damn. Still - it lasted two h
On 30 Apr 2002 at 12:26, Rupprecht, James R wrote:
> Hey Rob...
>
> Being the lazy type when possible, I have always had my pack assembled by
> the battery seller. I initially used NiCd cells for my packs. What I found
> was that using the Sanyo 225 mah cells (I think they are same ones you use)
On 30 Apr 2002 at 10:41, HUDERER Bernd wrote:
> > Pentax SMC A* 100mm/2.8 Macro lens $625
>
> Is it really A* ? Would explain the price. Never heard about such type.
There was an error in the listing, it's an A lens, it's a reasonable price,
want to buy it?
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
On 30 Apr 2002 at 11:47, T Rittenhouse wrote:
> I used to think, wow, these guys are making a fortune on shipping when I saw a
> $15-20 ssh. Now, I know better.
In most part the packing is free for me, however I will charge the buyer should
I have to buy packing to suite the item. I have to att
On 30 Apr 2002 at 9:37, HUDERER Bernd wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> AA cells have a diameter of 14mm. And also 1/3AA cells have a diameter of
> 14mm.
> A cells have a diameter of 17mm -> 1/3A have also 17mm.
>
> And here's the point I don't understand which cells you used for your
> repair. You wrote 22
Okay, I've been watching this thread on batteries for a while and I do
have some comments/questions.
i) We use ni-cad batteries in a particularly nasty industrial application
(underwater instrumentation) and we found that the panasonic ni-cads are
real survivors. If I was looking to replace ni-c
Hi,
An offending water droplet landed right on my slide today (thankfully
only a shot of architecture here so can take it again sometime). How do
I get rid of the spot it formed there ?
I also noticed the slide mounting eats away into a portion of the
shot all around. Is this standard or are the
- Original Message -
From: Nitin Garg
Subject: saving slides with water drops on them.
> Hi,
>
> An offending water droplet landed right on my slide today
(thankfully
> only a shot of architecture here so can take it again
sometime). How do
> I get rid of the spot it formed there ?
It i
>ii) It appears that the LX winder battery packs expire and require
>surgery. I would love to get one (even one that needs surgery). Would
>anyone be interested in trading for one of the T handle AA battery packs?
>
>Len.
I'd do it if you want, Len. You mean the LX motor pack...
Andre
--
-
T
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 06:50:40PM -0600, William Robb wrote:
> >
> > An offending water droplet landed right on my slide today
> (thankfully
> > only a shot of architecture here so can take it again
> sometime). How do
> > I get rid of the spot it formed there ?
>
> It is there forever. Nothing
I just "discovered" that cut and sleeved slides are a much better option for
scanning. I've had major dust issues and with no slide mounts it makes it
easier to clean the strip before it goes in the scanner. I also think that
the film strip is flatter and gets a better scan.
I use an HP photosm
Nitin wrote:
> An offending water droplet landed right on my slide today (thankfully
> only a shot of architecture here so can take it again sometime). How do
> I get rid of the spot it formed there ?
Holding the slide about a half inch above a candle flame will
fix that offen
Another slide question :)
If by mistake one gets a fingerprint on a slide (havent done that yet
but i do it to prints all the time) is there any better way to "clean"
it than wiping with a soft microfiber cloth ?
thanks,
nitin
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 09:22:47PM -0400, Christian Skofteland wrote
I am sure you have a fix for world's hunger and peace problem too ;)
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 06:23:08PM -0700, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
> Nitin wrote:
>
> > An offending water droplet landed right on my slide today (thankfully
> > only a shot of architecture here so can take it again someti
I don't know of any trouble spots with the original 645. Like any mechanical
toy, they wear with time and use, so newer is better I suppose.
a. The 645 meter is more primitive than the 645n or 645nii. But it is very
good.
b. The original 645 allowed exposure compensation (via a push button on the
I'm not sure if it's identical to the K, but it's a great lens in its
own right. One of my favorites.
Paul
Jim Fellows wrote:
>
> Is this the same as the K version optically? I have a chance to buy one
> very cheaply that is in great shape. I have been looking for a nice
> portrait lens in the
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo