Doug Franklin a écrit:
> Hi Alek,
>
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 11:13:44 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>>What is the price of such adapter AF?
>
In Europa (web on Germany):
http://www.fotokoch.de
193 (193 $)
Michel
http://www.pentax.com/products/cameras/camera_specs.cfm?productid=01449
regards,
Alan Chan
I am getting mixed information on the ZX-Ls autofocus system. Is it a 6
point autofocus system like the MZ-S or only 3 like the ZX5n, or, none of
the above??
__
Hello nice people,
I am getting mixed information on the ZX-Ls autofocus system. Is it a 6 point
autofocus system like the MZ-S or only 3 like the ZX5n, or, none of the above??
Thanks,
RObert
___
GO.com Mail
G
Oops forgot to start it off. I like to go to
http://www.naturepix.com/
just to check out the galleries once in a while
Vic
You can easily turn off the beeper if you wish. The MZ-S is more expensive
in Canada than in the US (grrr), but I bought mine here anyway, and I'm very
happy with it.
Pat White
There are so many great photography Web sites around that are not strictly
Pentax related. I'm wondering if we should put together a list of the users'
favourite (non-pentax photography web sites
Could be a good resource and we could certainly kill some serious time
checking them out.
Vic
Only here could someone take a flip remark and complicate it so. (Someone
is thinking
way too much about this). I think the short answer is yes.
At 10:39 PM 12/10/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Ah, but what if the pro is taking family snapshots on his day off? Is he
still a
pro? And would the camera
frank,
Much simpler than you think. 5FPS = Pro. Nikon = Pro. Canon = Pro.
Pentax = Amateur. Minolta = Amateur.
Of course, this only works with 35mm because those are the only pro
cameras. What's medium format anyway?
VBG
Bruce
Tuesday, December 10, 2002, 7:39:17 PM, you wrote:
ft> Ah,
They must tie them on top like a trophy buck.
At 01:54 PM 12/10/2002 +, you wrote:
A Smart Police car! Is that an oxymoron? Assuming cops travel in pairs,
where do they stow the handcuffed burglar?
Cotty
Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
http://www.mac
No, American police officer would be caught dead in that, (but it is so
damned cute).
At 10:03 AM 12/10/2002 +0100, you wrote:
Hi all,
reading this thread I remembered the smallest police car I ever saw. I
was in Capri, the famous island in front of Sorrento and Naples where
VIPs and generally af
Ah, but what if the pro is taking family snapshots on his day off? Is he still a
pro? And would the camera he uses be a pro camera? What if he uses the same
camera to take those snapshots as he does whilst working? Would it only be a pro
camera while "on the job", but an amateur camera on Sunda
Well the 30mm is more of a substitute, and a much superior one at that, for
one of the K or M 28mm lenses. That said I can only second the assessment
that this is a great lens. It may be overlooked due to it's relative rarity.
At 09:36 AM 12/10/2002 -0500, you wrote:
In a message dated 12/10/
You DO have a way with words, Pål.
keith
Pål Jensen wrote:
>
> Graywolf wrote:
>
> >2--They find a sense of community here
> > that satisfies a need in their life. If you restrict what they can talk
> > about to strickly Pentax and photography, the second group is going to leave
> > the list.
>
Impressive, Jeff! I'd love to have shared that!
I was the worst kind of sports car snob back in the mid-'50s.
My first was a Triumph TR-3. Changed the plugs (literally!) and raced
it on Lake Erie's Pelee Island, Northern Ohio's Race Around the
Houses, in Put-in-Bay, in Lake Erie, put on by the Spo
That's easy, professional cameras are the ones professionals use, amateurs
use amateur
cameras.
At 05:24 PM 12/10/2002 -0600, you wrote:
I've got one! I'm still not too clear on the difference between professional
and amateur cameras ... (running and ducking)
- Original Message -
From: "
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> What is Portra 400UC?
It's a new version. UC = Ultra Color.
--
Thomas Van Veen Photography
www.bigdayphoto.com
301-758-3085
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> Related question--Portra 800? Anyone have any comments
> about it?
Yes - yuck.
tv
I use a lot of Portra 160NC in 35mm, but I tend to use the 400 versions,
both NC and VC in 6x7. In part for better depth of field but also for
higher shutter speeds that negate any vibration problems. I generally
expose the 160NC at iso 100 and the 400NC at 300.
Paul
Dan Scott wrote:
>
> On Tuesd
I wanted o get a MZ-3 as my first Pentax camera but did try the MZ-S for an
hour...too bad
I will have only one question : does the MZ-S need to "beep" whenever it gets
the AF blocked ?
grr in France MZ-S are 300 Euros costier than in Germany ( 950 Euros ) ..
i shall sell one or two Nikon AI-s
Pat wrote:
>
> --- Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Speaking of which, can anyone tell me the film margin code for Fuji
> > Superia X-TRA 400 and Kodak Royal Gold 200 film?
>
> Keith-
>
> The X-TRA 400 reads "Fuji S-400".
>
> Hope this helps,
> Pat in SF
Close enough, Pat. I found
> I'll bet that's true! You need a longer wheelbase (vs. track
> dimensions) to aid stability.
> Still, for 'around town' it seems hard to beat!
> You could not be a Juan Fangio, or a Nuvolari (!) but if you drive
> sanely, it ought to be a ton of fun!
>
> keith whaley
>
Keith,
You must be an old
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 05:59 PM, Michael Cross wrote:
Dan,
Portra 800 has become my default indoor available light/flash film. I
use 160 NC outdoors and Portra 800 indoors. I acutally prefer 800 to
the 400NC (35mm) which I really don't like at all. I am stunned that
this is a
What is Portra 400UC? Portra 400VC is my favorite color negative film,
particularly with the 6x7 where speed is a factor. I've even used it for
some portraits instead of the NC. But I'm curious about UC. What is it?
Paul
> On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:36 pm, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> > So, to actua
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 05:52 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Just looked at the Fuji NPZ 800 that I have shot for comparison. Grain
looks better than Superia 800, color is a bit on the cool side (that
is what I usually get from Fuji and my lab). Slightly contrasty but
not bad. I would say
Hum...? Same old polite friendly Pal, I see. You know something, I believe
you have a RIGHT to have a different opinion than me. In fact that has been
my argument in this whole thread, people have a right to their opinion, and
to express it. The opposition is that certain people should shut up. So
--- Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Speaking of which, can anyone tell me the film margin code for Fuji
> Superia X-TRA 400 and Kodak Royal Gold 200 film?
Keith-
The X-TRA 400 reads "Fuji S-400".
Hope this helps,
Pat in SF
__
Do you Yaho
Dan,
Portra 800 has become my default indoor available light/flash film. I
use 160 NC outdoors and Portra 800 indoors. I acutally prefer 800 to
the 400NC (35mm) which I really don't like at all. I am stunned that
this is an 800 speed film. I actually shoot it at 640, but it has a
great de
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 07:54 AM, Doug Franklin wrote:
Howdy, Peter,
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 04:20:10 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would say generally that mirrors are never quite going to perform
like
regular lenses, however if you can provide a stable platform that
will help
co
Dan,
My experience with Max 400/800 has been poor. Pretty good color - bad
contrast (too contrasty) and crappy grain.
I know that Tom V. has not had good luck with Portra 800 - so now I
have to pull out the proofs from the few rolls of it that I have shot.
In looking them over, the contrast is
--- Pat White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, QEW is short for Queen Elizabeth Way.
Oops, I stand corrected. I asked the same question myself one snowy winter in
Toronto. I guess there must've been a snow ball or a muffler over my ears that
day .
Pat in SF
__
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 07:54 AM, Cotty wrote:
A Smart Police car! Is that an oxymoron? Assuming cops travel in pairs,
where do they stow the handcuffed burglar?
Cotty
They put him under the hood and let the hamster take a break?
Dan Scott
--- Pat White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, QEW is short for Queen Elizabeth Way. You're right about speeds
> in California. Last summer I drove to California, and typical speeds on I-5
> were 75-90 mph, but almost no-one travelled any faster. Have you driven in
> Europe?
Nope, never d
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 01:41 AM, Ken Archer wrote:
Keep looking. They are available. I have been watching ebay for a
couple of years for a K3.5/35. I found one a month ago on ebay for $30
in mint condition. Only the plastic cap had a little silver lettering
rubbed off on it.
On
Bob Blakely wrote:
I think that most folks on this list *assume* that the primary interest of
the other members of the list is photography, either as their main or only
hobby or for photography commercial purposes. This is a *false* assumption.
So what. This isn't the GunDML- so please take t
Then what the f*ck were they doing it here with constant posts of lies?
I waited, biting my lip, for more than 40 posts on this subject before
observing that all the "Stop posting that" folks had begun fighting among
themselves. YOU pissed on me for that! Well I got bloody tired of it about
the ti
Bruce Dayton wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
> I wouldn't try the red-eye reduction mode simply because too many
> people let their guard down after the first flash and you end up more
> often with the "after shot" look.
Do they also have a sudden urge to have a smoke?
keith
> Bruce
>
> Tuesday, De
The problem is that in Av the camera ZX-L chooses shortest handholdable
speed (1/45s for 50mm,1/30s for 35mm and so on)and in shutter priority the
camera chooses the largest aperature for the lens. This can not be forgone
by setting the aperature on the lens since this automatically sets the
c
As far as the PDML goes, Bill,same old,same old:)
However we did get a new kitten.Not sure if we should name it
Wheatfield or MJ.
(Sorry guys,just to tempting
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
lines.
It's good to be back. Have I missed anything intere
Michael,
I wouldn't try the red-eye reduction mode simply because too many
people let their guard down after the first flash and you end up more
often with the "after shot" look.
Bruce
Tuesday, December 10, 2002, 12:39:39 PM, you wrote:
MC> Bruce,
MC> I just tried selecting the red-eye redu
Michael,
No, let it go. The camera believes that you shouldn't hand hold it
lower than 1/45 with your 35mm lens. That should be ok for the time
being. Do a few test shots there and see how they turn out. You
might try it on a few who didn't blink and a few who did.
The other thing to try is s
Sounds good Jeff.Let us know your thoughts:)
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 11:59:33 -0500
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: OT: Hanukah & Christmas gift all-in-one
Today I received the Minolta Spotmeter F in the mail. It's in great
Bruce,
I just tried selecting the red-eye reduction mode on the camera. That mode
gives a noticeably earlier pre-flash about a second prior to the shot. I
wonder if the red eye mode would allow people to adjust to the flash and
get their eyes back open before the shot?
Michael
Bruce Dayton
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 12:00 PM, Michael Cross wrote:
On Saturday evening, I used my new (to me) AF360-FGZ to take some
pictures at our Christmas party. When I got back the prints, the
majority of the photos had at least one person with their eyes closed.
The house was fairly dar
Bruce,
Manually setting the aperture at f/5.6, the shutter speed doesn't go
lower than 45 in either Program or TV. Would it be better to set the
shutter speed at 30 in Manual mode to get a little more ambient light?
Michael
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Michael,
Try about 5.6 with the aperture ring
Michael,
Try about 5.6 with the aperture ring. Leave the rest of the camera in
program and I think that it will not set the shutter below 1/30 and
not greater than flash synch speed.
Bruce
Tuesday, December 10, 2002, 12:13:45 PM, you wrote:
MC> Bruce,
MC> With the ZX-L, I cannot select TTL
Bruce,
With the ZX-L, I cannot select TTL, my only choices are A, M and P-TTL.
I used fast film (Portra 800).
Could you offer a little guidance about camera settings with flash? In
this instance, I was using the FA 50mm f/1.4.
I used the Program AE (a smiley face on the ZX-L), and the camera
Forget it.
I got it to work.
Collin
>Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:47:45 -0500
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Collin Brendemuehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: KAF forced focus movement
>
>How can I FORCE (by pin shorting or some other means)
>the 28-70 lens to move?
>
>Collin
How can I FORCE (by pin shorting or some other means)
the 28-70 lens to move?
Collin
Of course it's self serving! It's clearly also serving of a fairly large
community, and specifically by one of that community who is affected.
Everyone who wants to preserve some part of liberty for himself is serving
of others as well as himself. Your whine is like saying that any member of a
grou
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Flavio Minelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
-- Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:15 AM
--
--
-- Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
-- >
-- > ...
-- >
-- > This was back when my scanning capabilities were poor, but
-- you can have a
-- > look at http://cesar_abdul.homest
Bob wrote:
>I belong to 7 lists
> associated with this. Nowhere on these lists has anyone ever disparaged
> photography or Pentax let alone do it using falsehoods, lies, untruths,
Of course not. They don't discuss pentax or photography but Guns. Can you please have
decency and consideration to t
Cesar posted:
I travelled to Italy with my mother and
> sister two years ago. We made it to Capri.
Cesar:
Where HAVEN"T you been?
Come to think of it, I'm not sure I want to know. I'm already jealous of your
well-travelled
status.
Nor do I, but no one is lying about your other interests in a manner that
accumulates to a potential for having those interests taken away.
Regards,
Bob
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy!"
- Benjami
Stephen Moore wrote:
>
> Keith Whaley wrote:
>
> > You could not be a Juan Fangio, or a Nuvolari (!)
>
> You're showing your age, sir...
And proudly so!
Those were the days of raw racing, and tough race-car drivers.
I'll drop the subject on that note, but these two men alone
represented jus
Michael,
Having used 360's extensively, the mode you are probably referring to
is P-TTL where a pre-flash for measurements is taken. In practice it
looks like one really long flash rather than two short ones.
I have not really noticed an excessive amount of shut eyes due to
blinking on hundreds
Okay. A little time is a common fix for recalcitrant URLs...
I did see the photos. Veery nice indeed.
Were it black, I'd have snapped at it. ;^)
As it is, I just got my first MX body about 2 weeks ago, and I'm still
wringing it out.
I know the one I have will not be my last, as I must have a back
It is a Smart car, sold under the brand Smart and marketed by Mercedes Benz
(it think) here in Europe. There was some involvement with Swatch, the swiss
brand selling funny plastic watches, but I don't know the extent of it.
In overcrowded towns here like Rome they're sold like hot cakes altough
t
Hi Michael...
I don't have direct experience with the AF360, but here's my theory on the
cause: Camera flashes cause most folks to blink. Hey, it's a natural
reaction to a very intense light. Usually, by the time a person blinks the
exposure has been completed. So it's not a matter of *if* peopl
Just tried 'em from here and they're working OK. SOmething in between may be
not working. Try again in a few minutes.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/mx_6-1.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/mx_6-2.jpg
Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My ISP's (Netscape) connction attempts were refused
I wanted to stay out of this but...
I'm on the pro side of this thread, but let's face facts. Regardless of any
posts made here, no one is going to change their opinion of the other side
of this debate. Therefore, LET THIS DAMNED THREAD DIE!
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "William Rob
I also have many interests more important to me than photography: my family, my
dogs, music, movies, collecting political campaign buttons and coins of imperial
Russia, politic, religion, etc. I don't, however, presume to bore my Pentax
friends on this list with my enthusiasms for all these other
Keith Whaley wrote:
> You could not be a Juan Fangio, or a Nuvolari (!)
You're showing your age, sir...
> but if you drive sanely, it ought to be a ton of fun!
Yes, but the sense of self-satisfaction is greater
when driving sanely in a car capable of insanity, no?
Anybody race these things?
S
Well Mr. Blakely, you definitely have the bigger virtual penis.
Your self serving factoids are as valid as self serving factoids
can be.
Regards
William Robb
On Saturday evening, I used my new (to me) AF360-FGZ to take some
pictures at our Christmas party. When I got back the prints, the
majority of the photos had at least one person with their eyes closed.
The house was fairly dark and the revelers had imbibed quite a bit of
Christmas cheer by the
I think that most folks on this list *assume* that the primary interest of
the other members of the list is photography, either as their main or only
hobby or for photography commercial purposes. This is a *false* assumption.
I enjoy photography and probably have $15k or so in Pentax equipment. My
My ISP's (Netscape) connction attempts were refused by your server,
for some reason...
keith whaley
Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> I also have goodies for sale, well one anyway:
>
> Pentax MX in excellent condition. Really *tiny* ding in top of pentaprism
> and small dent in bottom plate. In general i
I have an Optio 330 and think it's just great. Small size, CF, good optical
zoom and "Pentax" etched into the front cover is what appealed to me. Now
with the underwater case I'm having a blast. It's replaced my IQZoom 120 as
"snap-shooter"
I would have bought an Optio 430 but couldn't justify
Do you know the manufacturer of that car? Model?
keith whaley
Flavio Minelli wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> reading this thread I remembered the smallest police car I ever saw. I
> was in Capri, the famous island in front of Sorrento and Naples where
> VIPs and generally affluent people likes to show thei
The only thing I can ad to this thread would be that I have dealt with a
company in London called Asahi Photo. Their technicians are ex-Pentax
technicians and I have found them friendly and QUICK. My ex-LX (bit of a
tongue twister there) went in for a full service before I sold it. The
cost was
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 06:11 AM, Keith Whaley wrote:
You said: "But I shot some portraits and they looked very good. So
where is the problem?"
If that makes you happy, then there IS no problem, Alek!
Keith Whaley
Very true.
Dan Scott
In a message dated 12/10/02 7:05:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< As Bob Rapp said, a Pentax-M 35mm f/3.5 is a superior lens, and better
than most other 35 mm lenses from anyone.
That is HIS opinion. It is also my opinion. >>
I have 35/3.5 lens and agree that it is a very good lens. But one
Hi Alek,
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 11:13:44 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What is the price of such adapter AF?
I'm not sure how much the 1.7X AF T/C costs currently. I think I paid
about $100 or $150 for mine a couple of years ago.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
A Smart Police car! Is that an oxymoron? Assuming cops travel in pairs,
where do they stow the handcuffed burglar?
Cotty
Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
http://www.macads.co.uk/
Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http
- Original Message -
From: Valentin Donisa
Subject: Re: Re[6]: Displaying images on the web
> Hi Bill,
>
> Since I'm now in Montreal, and on a slow dial-up link,
> there's nothing I can do about it. If anyone wants to
> move the gallery on a different server and maintain
> it, please
I also have goodies for sale, well one anyway:
Pentax MX in excellent condition. Really *tiny* ding in top of pentaprism
and small dent in bottom plate. In general it's a beautiful specimen: Chrome
is great and just a couple of little spots of paint wear on the film door
(hinge and latch end look
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> It is a Smart car, sold under the brand Smart and marketed by Mercedes Benz
> (it think) here in Europe. There was some involvement with Swatch, the swiss
> brand selling funny plastic watches, but I don't know the extent of it.
>
> In overcrowded towns here like Ro
>> >What are the advantages of 55mm any opinions on this lens
>>
>> It becomes an 88mm on a Pentax DSLR at 1.6X mag factor for estimated chip
>> size. The 50mm is only 80mm effective, and not as good for portraiture
>> IMO. However, I'd still go for the wider aperture of the 50 1.4 or 1.2
>>
>>
Today I received the Minolta Spotmeter F in the mail. It's in great
condition.
Great Hanukah gift.
The bonus (Christmas gift) came from Customs. No taxes. Saved $35US.
Yes!!!
Jeff.
#1 ME-F$100
Excellent condition.
Just a few typical small paint chips on the edge of the back.
The perfect substitute/replacement for your ME/ME Super.
Why?
It's basically the same camera with Focus Confirmation added.
#2 35-70/2.8 (for ME-F) $40
Good Condition.
So
"Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We finally got our electric power back late yesterday, after 5 days without.
>Thank you Alabama Power, one of the many out of state companies who have
>come to North Carolina to help restore some sense of normalcy here.
>
>I haven't heard the latest, but la
We finally got our electric power back late yesterday, after 5 days without.
Thank you Alabama Power, one of the many out of state companies who have
come to North Carolina to help restore some sense of normalcy here.
I haven't heard the latest, but last Thursday there were 1,200,000 Duke
Power cu
Howdy, Peter,
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 04:20:10 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would say generally that mirrors are never quite going to perform like
> regular lenses, however if you can provide a stable platform that will help
> considerably.
You know, I've seen this opinion expressed many ti
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:03:38 +0100, Flavio Minelli wrote:
> Have a look:
> http://space.tin.it/arte/flamin/tinplcar.jpg
The front "license plate" seems to say "BOOBZ"! :-)
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Keep looking. They are available. I have been watching ebay for a
couple of years for a K3.5/35. I found one a month ago on ebay for $30
in mint condition. Only the plastic cap had a little silver lettering
rubbed off on it.
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 01:04 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Tamron SP lenses (except for 90 macro) were never popular.
I think that the SP 500/8 mirror has sold fairly well (they show up
on eBay fairly often, anyway), and ~it~ (as the same lens design, I
believe, although I am not certain of that) has been in the Tamron
lineup for a long time. It has go
> As Bob Rapp said, a Pentax-M 35mm f/3.5 is a superior lens, and
> better than most other 35 mm lenses from anyone. That is HIS
> opinion. It is also my opinion.
I would say that Bob's opinion has been stated by a number of us,
too. I think K 35/3.5 owners are happy owners.
Fred
> At f5.6 through f8, I think it is, along with its twin the f1.8,
> the sharpest normal lens that Pentax has manufactured.
I sort of agree, Bob, but I would say that the very high sharpness
starts at f/8. The two 55/1.8 samples I've had (and I still have
one of 'em) were/are only average through
> But I shot some portraits and they looked very good.
> But shootig at infinity K105/2.8 should give great results I
> think. I nearly only shoot in this way so maybe that is why I did
> not observed the problem.
Did you shoot the portraits at infinity?
> Do you have this lens?
Well, I used to
> I see my K105/2.8 is very sharp (Velvia) and wonder what you mean
> saying about harsh bokeh.
> How to describe bokeh in other words?
The K 105/2.8 is indeed very sharp, for in-focus subjects. However,
it also seems to produce rather sharp outlines around out-of-focus
objects, too (i.e., "hars
<< State of the art technology, from the same source as above.
"Berkeley’s steel mini-engine currently runs on hydrogen and can
keep a bicycle headlight lighted for two hours on a shot glass
of fuel" >>
Mike. How does that compare to a carbide lamp? I think we should be
told
Kind re
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> It was K35/3.5 I think.
> I see what you mean it is difficult to say it is the best lens etc.
> But taking into consideration only sharpness, resolution and color
> rendition one can show which is better. I know the price of FA 35/2.0
>( do not know average price o
> Beats chasing thiefs on foot or bicycle.
>
Not where there are no roads...but as long as the thief has no fast boat
there's little chance he can escape. There's very little crime there, anyway.
> Jeff.
>
>
> PS: looks similar to the "Smart" car I've seen in Ontario.
In fact it i
Shaun posted:
> What are you then trying to focus on? If you are attempting to focus on
> anything closer than 3 feet or thereabouts, the AF adapter will not work
> properly. If, on the other hand you are focusing from three feet too
> infinity and the AF doesn't work, it may well be stuffed. I
Flavio,
Your account brought back memories. I travelled to Italy with my mother and
sister two years ago. We made it to Capri.
This was back when my scanning capabilities were poor, but you can have a
look at http://cesar_abdul.homestead.com/Italia_Capri.html for a few shots
on the Isle.
Cesar
So good luck in looking for K35/3.5 lens. I also plan to replace my M35/2.8 with any K
35mm or even FA35/2.0 in future.
Alek
Użytkownik William Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
>I have a friend with the M35/2.8 and I have the Super Takumar 35/3.5 which is
>supposed to be the same optically a
Is there a reliable mail order source for hoods for the M 50/1.7 and M
28/2.8?
Thanks, Bill Lawlor
Beats chasing thiefs on foot or bicycle.
Jeff.
PS: looks similar to the "Smart" car I've seen in Ontario.
- Original Message -
From: "Flavio Minelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PDML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 4:03 AM
Subject: Talking about tiny cars...
> Hi al
I firmly believe that it is aging the stuff in oak barrels that caused those
delusions (Pentax DSLR in this case) we don't have that problem with the
plane ol' corn liqueur we drink over here.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAI
on 10.12.02 13:42, T Rittenhouse at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is a 28-200 Tamaron with a Pentax name on it better than a one with a Nikon
> badge, or a Canon badge? Is a 100/3.5 macro Pentax better than the Vivitar,
> or the Phoenix? Except for the top of the line "pro" lenses which I would
> ass
Which brings up a point.
Is a 28-200 Tamaron with a Pentax name on it better than a one with a Nikon
badge, or a Canon badge? Is a 100/3.5 macro Pentax better than the Vivitar,
or the Phoenix? Except for the top of the line "pro" lenses which I would
assume are at least designed in-house, can you
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
