Dave Brooks wrote:
How often per month would you say you bring the beast out.
Not very often at the moment. Too busy with other things. I use it a
lot more when I'm travelling. My body has a minor light leak at the
moment but I can't get it fixed until I finish the roll of film thats
Peter from sunny Brighton wrote:
Tomorrow Stan I will be taking the air in Chichester.
Not stopping off in Bognor, I hope g. I wanted to wander around
Chichester but only ended up going straight through a few times.
I guess that 30mUKP needs to be reallocated. Free *ist-D's for the
entire
Hi Cesar,
on 30 Mar 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
re-enlistment. I tried to do some test shots, discovered that the
sharpness, contrast, and saturation settings of the camera are not recorded
in the Exif data :-(
Are you sure? If you use a Windows PC then try Exifreader (http://
Thanks David,Paul,Bruce,William for your replies.
Everything seems pretty constent except for film,which is understandable,as its a
personal
preference.
For those who shoot trannies,.mounted or unmounted. I have seen internet ad's for
projectors which
will show 2 1/4 so i'l assume there
Peter, I think you've caught a ghost!
Look in the second photo, second window right from that space to the right
of the gazebo. See the person standing there? Could be a trick or the fire
isn't as close to the windows as it looks but it sure looks like a guy in
there...
Nice shots man,
Cory
On March 29, 2003 06:06 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks David,Paul,Bruce,William for your replies.
Everything seems pretty constent except for film,which is understandable,as
its a personal preference.
For those who shoot trannies,.mounted or unmounted. I have seen
internet ad's for
Here is some exciting news.
Prices on the FAJ (Sigma busters)
Adorama lists the following:
28-80mm59.95
75-300129.95
Of course, these are lenses that I would NEVER consider buying!!!
Bob
Sold the two lenses last week. (43 A100)
Hated to do it, but had to.
Nobody wanted the bodies, so it looks like they'll stay.
Now I need just a basic 50mm lens.
Something to allow me to shoot.
A or K 50/1.7. Something basic decent.
Thanks,
Collin
*
Never give up, never surrender!
--- Yes, you
Hu.
Thanks Nick
Dave
On March 29, 2003 06:06 pm, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks David,Paul,Bruce,William for your replies.
Everything seems pretty constent except for film,which is understandable,as
its a personal preference.
For
- Original Message -
From: Mishka
i just came back from a vataction
A wineries tour, by any chance?
;-)
Regards,
Anthony Farr
i would like both but the wife has limited me to one.
i noticed that there is a 500mm on ebay at the moment.
what would be a good price? Is 100mm a lot of difference? noticeable?
anyone used one or both of these lenses?
thanks
Hi Heiko,
Thank you for the information. I just tried it out and it is there! I was
using IrfanView to read the EXIF, for its speed. I was going to look for
something else to read the EXIF since I figured it might be imbedded in
there.
Once again thanks, it makes testing a lot easier.
A breezy
Cesar Matamoros II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Saturday afternoon/evening I decided to attend a Hash House Harriers run.
On-on Cesar! I haven't run with the HHH in a couple of years. I'm
nervous about doing so here in Pittsburgh because the local HHH have a
reputation for rowdy behavior even beyond
These are well done. I especially liike 3, 6, 7. It's unfortunate
(but true) that terrible events make great photos.
That's artiste
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/29/03 02:13PM
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, you've all seen my Indy Jones fedora, now you get
For those with a Mac, instead of a PC, this program is written ONLY
for the PC.
keith
Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
Hi Heiko,
Thank you for the information. I just tried it out and it is there! I was
using IrfanView to read the EXIF, for its speed. I was going to look for
something else to
From: collinb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Now I need a lens or two
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 07:50:56 -0500
Sold the two lenses last week. (43 A100)
Hated to do it, but had to.
Nobody wanted the bodies, so it looks like they'll stay.
Now I need
Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's artiste
Oh mais oui!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/29/03 02:13PM
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, you've all seen my Indy Jones fedora, now you get to see one
of my berets...vbg
Beret? Why, you must be an...an...ARTIST!
--
Mark
Hi Cesar,
on 30 Mar 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
Thank you for the information. I just tried it out and it is there! I
was using IrfanView to read the EXIF, for its speed.
I've used IrfanView for some time but meanwhile I have replaced it with
Xnview (www.xnview.com) which is also freeware
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/30/03
at 10:37 PM, Bob Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
|28-80mm59.95
|75-300129.95
|Of course, these are lenses that I would NEVER consider buying!!!
an FAJ 40 mm would go well with my MZ-50 though
Bran
--
Good memory Peter...
Yes, I adapted my grip B with one of the top lugs. Pix
of it are here:
http://www.members.aol.com/bmacrae/lx1.jpg
http://www.members.aol.com/bmacrae/lx2.jpg
You're very right to mention that anchoring the lug
well is essential. Mine is secured with a nut and then
sealed
Good memory Peter...
Yes, I adapted my grip B with one of the top lugs. Pix
of it are here:
http://www.members.aol.com/bmacrae/lx1.jpg
http://www.members.aol.com/bmacrae/lx2.jpg
You're very right to mention that anchoring the lug
well is essential. Mine is secured with a nut and then
sealed
Yesterday I had a chance to play with an Optio S at Japan Camera (Toronto).
Wow, I'm excited. With this camera, there's no reason for not carrying one all
the time.
Could someone direct me to sample shots and reviews?
Jeff.
Andre,
I found the nut to fit the lug purely by accident. I
had a box full of broken cameras and other items that
I went through and came across the nut that ended up
working perfectly. The threads on the lug are very
fine. I had tried a number of machine nuts (metric)
but none did the trick.
Hi folks
I have a 300m f4 M*, great lens but really needs a tripod
mountespecially if I use it witha X1.4 converter.
Same problem as when I use my 200m F4M with a short tube for
closeups
There must be a 3rd party tripod colar that you can use on a lens, tube or
extender
Hi,
Sunday, March 30, 2003, 7:39:37 PM, you wrote:
Hi folks
I have a 300m f4 M*, great lens but really needs a tripod
mountespecially if I use it witha X1.4 converter.
Same problem as when I use my 200m F4M with a short tube for
closeups
There must be a 3rd
Previously I wrote:
Kiev has it in Nikon, Leica, and Minolta mounts. There are a couple of
Ukrainian dealers offering these on eBay in a bunch of other mounts,
including Pentax K.
New follow-up:
I wonder if one could buy this in, say, Nikon mount, then find an
adapter to get to K mount?
Hi
I have just acquired - and have been using - a late version SMC 500 4.5, I also have
an SMC-A 400 5.6. The telephoto effect and the compression of planes is much more
noticeable with the 500mm lens. The manual diaphragm is a slight drag but not too bad
with an auto camera. I focus at f4.5
Last December I sent the following message to the list. Well, April is
almost at hand, and so I announce the opening of the
Bulwer-Lytton/William Robb contest for best photographic cliché
Send your choice to me at:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll keep a total and announce the winner at the end of the
Clive Evans escribió:
Hi folks
I have a 300m f4 M*, great lens but really needs a tripod
mountespecially if I use it witha X1.4 converter.
Same problem as when I use my 200m F4M with a short tube for
closeups
There must be a 3rd party tripod colar that you can
- Original Message -
From: Bob Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 10:33 PM
Subject: subscribe
subscribe
They seem to be available in screw mount I'd go for that if I could find one.
At 12:17 PM 3/30/2003 -0700, you wrote:
Previously I wrote:
Kiev has it in Nikon, Leica, and Minolta mounts. There are a couple of
Ukrainian dealers offering these on eBay in a bunch of other mounts,
including Pentax
Since the PZ-1 is a camera Pentax still supports, I figured it was
definitely worth it when I sent mine in to Pentax Colorado (a year ago)
soon after picking it up used. It wasn't in terrible shape and all
functions seemed to be operating. The thing I definitely wanted replaced
was that
- Original Message -
From: Taz
Subject: Re: PZ-1 CLA cost
I replaced my eyepiece in my PZ-1 as well.but yikes are those things
easy to scratch
I just bought a new pair of spectacles. The plastic lenses are coated with a
quartz (I think) material that is supposed to be very
On March 30, 2003 02:59 pm, Peter Alling wrote:
They seem to be available in screw mount I'd go for that if I could find
one.
Wouldn't surprise me if they are all really screw mount to start with.
Nick
On 30 Mar 2003 at 18:02, Heiko Hamann wrote:
I've used IrfanView for some time but meanwhile I have replaced it with
Xnview (www.xnview.com) which is also freeware and much better, IMO. But
all viewers that I've seen have problems to show the complete EXIF
information. So there's no
On March 30, 2003 05:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just when i thought it was safe to go into the water lol.Thanks
Pat,interesting idea.
Ebay Item # 2919910899 went for nobid. $18. Will supposedly handle 3x3
[that's inches-)]
I think it's back on sale. Needs a new cord.
This one
I've never sent my Pz-1p in for a CLA, but I sent a Pz-70 and Pz-20, and my
seems to need regualr trips to the mountains for its health.
I've never been charged more the $150, never been charged less than
$120. The biggest repair was with the Pz-70. They replaced the shutter
(mine was
UPDATE: For some reason this came through to me with my e-mail address
deleted. So I'll try again, and try to disguise my address:
jtainteratmindspringdotcom
In the above, replace 'at' with @ and 'dot' with a dot.
Don't know why the server did this.
Joe
Last December I sent the following
The repair/replacement of casings included replacing the baseplate, of
course, which had the common crack near the battery door. They might have
replaced the RTF, or at least the top plastic cover of the RTF, as well.
The camera, although a bit scuffed, was operational before the CLA, but I
if you have a large collection of images for it to manage, it can get pretty slow. by
large, i mean 6-7000 images. it's Photoshop import filter is also deathly slow.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003
I don't know, but I guess the eyepiece assembly and bottom plate would be
the 1st to disappear from the parts department. If that bothers you, buy and
keep one of each just in case. If you really want a scratch free way to
clean that plastic eyepiece, you can use Opti-clean which can be found
Certainly. Not much could go wrong with this model for as long as it's not
suffered from impact or water damage. The scratch-prone plastic eyepiece and
crack-prone bottom plate are a pain in the axx of course.
regards,
Alan Chan
The repair/replacement of casings included replacing the
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Heiko Hamann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 11:02 AM
--
-- Hi Cesar,
--
-- on 30 Mar 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
--
-- Thank you for the information. I just tried it out and it
-- is there! I
-- was using IrfanView to read the
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 11:51 AM
--
-- Yesterday I had a chance to play with an Optio S at Japan
-- Camera (Toronto).
--
-- Wow, I'm excited. With this camera, there's no reason for
-- not carrying one all
-- the time.
Herb Chong wrote:
if you have a large collection of images for it to manage,
it can get pretty slow. by large, i mean 6-7000 images.
Who among us _ever_ has 6000 images to manipulate?
I wouldn't have that many over a lifetime!
it's [sic] Photoshop import filter is also deathly slow.
It was titled Pentax Program Plus 35mm w/ 70-200mm lens
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2919359582category=15240
but almost no one noticed that here was a 24/2.8 A lens and a motordrive
A in the package too.
BR
I feel sorry for the seller, he got ROBBED!
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Rubenstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 9:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Somebody got a bargin
It was titled Pentax Program Plus 35mm w/ 70-200mm lens
Just proves you should NEVER sell pkg. deals on
ebay. Much better to list everything separately.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Rubenstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 9:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Somebody got a bargin
It was titled Pentax
BTW, whats the difference between a Program Plus and a Super Program?
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Rubenstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 9:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Somebody got a bargin
It was titled Pentax Program Plus 35mm w/
i'm accumulating images at the rate of about 5000/year. that is a minimum rate for
anyone trying to sell photos as editorial stock and make some money. this is about 1/4
the expected rate for someone who intends to make about half their income from selling
stock photos. all of it has to be
Fewer exposure modes, fewer flash modes, slower max shutter speed,
than a super program, should be called a program minus.
At 09:47 PM 3/30/2003 -0500, you wrote:
BTW, whats the difference between a Program Plus and a Super Program?
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Rubenstein
Maybe the seller just wanted to sell the stuff and got what the seller
considered was fair.
Jim A.
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 21:44:59 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Somebody got a bargin
Resent-From: [EMAIL
Folks also need to title and catagorize their things right. Yesterday
some one put EOS in the title and listed it Camera parts and
accessories: it was a brand new, never used EOS 3 for $500 and no one
even bid on it.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just proves you should NEVER sell pkg. deals on
On March 30, 2003 10:19 pm, Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
Folks also need to title and catagorize their things right. Yesterday
some one put EOS in the title and listed it Camera parts and
accessories: it was a brand new, never used EOS 3 for $500 and no one
even bid on it.
Stuffs only worth
Super A/Program also has TTL flash. LX is the only other Pentax manual focus
body with this feature. To top it off, Pentax also gave us the noisy shutter
and vibrate shutter. Guess Pentax realized nothing should be too perfect
(just like many other Pentax cameras over the years). :)
regards,
BTW, whats the difference between a Program Plus and a Super Program?
JCO
Besides TTL flash, the other thing that's lacking is the LCD display is not
backlit on the Program A/Plus, making it almost impossible to see in low
light conditions.
I use a little penlight torch to illuminate it most of
So, I paid a visit to Linden Photo when I was in London, Ontario two
weeks ago. I told them I was looking for A 35mm lens. An initial
search by the staff turned up nothing...but then the retired owner
who comes in every now and then to help out his niece (the current
owner) shuffled off into
Uytkownik Peter Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
They seem to be available in screw mount I\'d go for that if I could find one.
They ARE available in m42 mount. Cost about 650PLN (~$160) in Poland. The K-mount
version is a bit more expensive (not much) and the Nikon version is a lot more
Here another story to keep you happy this evening:
Two years ago, a fellow caveman won an LX on e-bay. The camera was sold
as is, with the mention film winding not working, and an A 135/2.8
bow wow lens. He got the lot for about $160.
After some fiddling with the R button, the film winding had
The 'compression' of the planes, or 'telephoto' effect, would be just the
same in an image taken with a 28 mm wide angle lens as one made using a 500
mm or any other telephoto. I may have said this before ... a couple of years
ago.
Don
___
Dr E D F Williams
Hi gang,
I know,
inane,
uninteresting,
hardly worth looking at,
dull topic.
No controversy here.
But, for all you 6x7 converts who know the feeling of that first set of negs
that look sooo huge:
FP4+, exposed at 100, just some outdoor portraits, some shots at the
University baseball game, some
Dave wrote:
Everything seems pretty constent except for film,which is
understandable,as its a personal preference. For those who shoot
trannies,.mounted or unmounted.
A mounted 6x7 slide is truely a joy to behold. But I've never seen a 4x5
or 8x10 yet.
I have mine sleeved then mount
Let me know what you may be looking for. I can probably set something up
and put it up on the internet if you like and I can find the time. Hey, any
excuse to take some shots - and help out a fellow PDMLer...
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
Nothing specific. Just some sharp images, to compare with
Yes
It's a hybrid, its expensive and the DO part is for controlling chromatic aberration
(or controlling the colour separation from the refracive elements), and not primarily
for focussing.
Dag
Fra: Ryan K. Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Canon 400 DO lens.
Dag T wrote:
Diffractive
65 matches
Mail list logo
