Maybe hot and humid but Flat, (best landscaping money can buy).
At 12:18 PM 2/6/04, you wrote:
Old >
William Robb wrote:
>
>
> Ewwwe, hot humid and flat.
Old >
Now leave Janet Jackout out of this!
CRB
I drink to make other people in
Hi Again,
More recent eBay listings from me...
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2985961450
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2985961439
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2985961458
Cheers
Shaun
Dr. Shaun Canning
Cultural Heritage
Arizona is a great concept, but if you really want it you'll have
to pipe in your own water. They'll be running low in about 10 years
at the rate their population is growing. It simply amazes me the
number of people who want to live in a desert and fill it with all
the plants from back home... T
Hi PDMLers,
Just listed a heap of stuff on eBay - including my beloved LX and Pz-1p.
Take a look!
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2985958620
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2985958641
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2985958592
On Feb 8, 2004, at 06:59, mike wilson wrote:
How about new?
http://www.morgancomputers.co.uk/shop/products2.asp?
CategoryID=16&SubCategoryID=101
Boy thats tempting. If only I could find an affordable PCI SCSI card
that'll fit my PowerMac.
I've had my eye on the Multi Pro but thats a little mo
I triede Neat Image. I works great.
Take a look:
http://gallery37564.fotopic.net/
All the best
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Peter Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 21. januar 2004 18:39
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: Photo noise
I downloaded a free, for personal use, prog
On Feb 7, 2004, at 02:31, Shaun Canning wrote:
This is the day commemorating the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi (a
treaty between the indigenous peoples (most commonly referred to as
Maori)
of Aotearoa (New Zealand) and the colonising British in 1840. See
http://www.archives.govt.nz/holdings/t
B&W, 35mm Leica, no flash ...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/essays/vanRiper/index.htm
>
> > it was found out that there is nothing illegal about taking a
> > picture of a government building. It's the jitters of 9/11
> > that is clouding everything.
>
> Yep, that's why I got stopped and questioned by the cops one day while
> taking pictures of the UN (with a shortish lens of co
Just relized you had a different shot of our
friend the whoseever hawk.
Nice shot! (but um, we do need a leeetle more
detail to settle identity.)
annsan still thinking coopers
Amita Guha wrote:
>
> I know we usually get creative with our interpretations of the monthly
> PUG themes, but I'm having trouble picking my submission for next month
> so I was wondering...is a "portrait" usually defined as a shot of a
> person or critter using a shallow depth of field, and with
At 07:26 AM 2/7/2004 -0600, Mark Dalal wrote:
Along with Carlos' observation of added warmth, it sounds perfect. Anyone
know the difference between the Elitechrome and Ektachrome films?
I bought some imported Elitechrome 200 a few years ago to use on a
vacation. The film was imported, so the usu
Sometimes a portrait doesn't include a person or a critter.
See Elliott Erwitt's famous portrait of Pablo Casals, the
cellist, made for the Puerto Rican Tourist Board (IIRC).
Casals couldn't be there because he had had a heart attack.
Yet Erwitt made a great portrait of the maestro ...
Amita Gu
Annsan,
If that is the case then you will have to be the subject of my shooting :-)
It will be so much fun with our mini-PDML,
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 12:04 AM
--
-- graywolf wr
Hmmm, wondering how my being atypical really says about me...
This is very true what Graywolf says about the sharing of gear. A good time
was had by TV and me shooting the otters with some $$$ telephoto lenses and
our respective cameras. Was this when TV dropped his 43??? I will never
tell...
-- -Original Message-
-- From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 10:16 AM
--
-- - Original Message -
-- From: "Chris"
-- Subject: Spots on my Shots
--
--
-- > My *ist D has become a pain in the bum!I am continually
-- having to clean the
-
Butch,
My 990 was my introduction to digital. I had it dropped and got a 995 as a
replacement. I have never shot tiff with these. Always jpeg fine or
lesser. For what I wanted it worked fine except for one instance when I did
not use fine.
As to the size limitation of the CF, it should go up
Ahhh Tanya,
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 8:30 PM
--
-- Oh - my - freaking - GAWD
??? What? What did I do!
--
-- Cesar, did you rob a bank, man??!!! That pic shows
-- almost as many
-- came
Interesting. I saw the shots and video shortly after the event.
I guess there are some advantages to be where I am, and do what I do :-)
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Francis Alviar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 4:49 PM
--
-- P
Thanks Peter,
I pondered on it for quite a while, but finally reasoned that there was
either a misunderstanding or it was just the way Mafud is.
How long have I been on the list?,
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Peter Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: T
I'm guessing teradactyl.
Norm
tom wrote:
Ok, so we're pretty sure it's not a peacock?
tv
That's quite alright, I'd rather sleep 8-)
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Cesar Matamoros II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 9:37 PM
Subject: RE: GFM plans
> Bill,
>
> I volunteer to be your alarm :-) Of course the difficult part would
Actually Rob, I've got to respectfully disagree with you on this one.
When assembled in someplace like China or the Philippines it's the other
way around.
Norm
Rob Studdert wrote:
Parts cost very little in the scheme of things, final assembly and testing are
often a large part of the unit cos
Bill,
I volunteer to be your alarm :-) Of course the difficult part would be to
awaken you without disturbing Phyllis...
César
Panama City, Florida
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Bill Owens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 12:46 PM
--
-- > Moon rise Friday
Frank,
I am in with you on this one. I have more shots of people shooting during
that weekend.
Looks like we will have a nice trio going...
All my LXen will be there and available for use. The comraderie is the
reason for my being there. I was initially invited by my Pentax rep. I
have yet t
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 7:06 PM
--
-- On 4/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
--
-- >645n
-- >FA45/2.8, FA75/2.8, FA120/4, A*300/4
-- >
-- >K-mount
-- >LX (3-5), MX, MZ-S, K-1000?, ME-Super?, Super Program?
Cotty,
I can always count on you for a comment :-)
Cesar
Panama City,
Florida
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 7:01 PM
--
-- On 4/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
--
-- >You can look at this shot I took with the Niko
Leon,
Have you ever heard of Speckgrabber from Kinetronics? It's a little plastic
stick with an adhesive tip that lifts dust from mirrors, screens, CCD's and
other surfaces without leaving a mark or residue. Give it a try. Using
blower bulb is the worst thing you can do, I tried removing specks of
Alan,
B&H carried black 28-105 shortly after the lens was introduced in US.
Following the usual Pentax color-matching goofiness only silver 28-105 were
legit US items, black lenses were imported gray market items. I had a silver
lens in my B&H wish list and today a black model just appeared along
William Robb writes:
> and rarely keep the camera in a gadget bag,
> choosing instead to leave it on a desk in the
> room beside where I am sanding drywall plaster.
NOOO, NO, NO, NO!!!
The drywall dust gets everywhere.
Lock up the camera gear in a baggie, at least.
Regards, Bob S.
Get your children babysitted and taken to an educational museum at the same
time, not to mention a lesson in observing photo technique.heh
heh.only $2/hr.
--
The only place I was told to give up my cameras was at the Corcoran
(private) gallery. They wouldn't let me
Thanks Leon,and others.I don't want to get rid of the *istD,or find out
about dust prevention.Just want to know the best method of removing
recalcitrant spots that are difficult to remove from the sensor.
Regards Cgris
"Take it Easy,But Take It!"
Don't buy this stuff, it will collapse in a house of cards!
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Skofteland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: Flash bracket for the 500FTZ (question for Eleanor)
> not necessarily the "digi
That last sentence was a joke. Sort of. ;)
- Original Message -
From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 4:09 PM
Subject: RE: photographer arrested
>
> > I
> > probably should have been arrested over my obsessive
> > photography of the
I use Sensia 200 or Velvia depending on conditions. The Sensia scans fine with little
grain except in plain blue skies enlarged to A3. The colour isn't as good as Sensia
100 (or obviously Velvia), but better than Sensia 400.
I personally prefer Fuji to other makes.
Nick
-Original Message-
Well the Pentax ME-F had this feature (which direction to turn the lens ring).
Nick
-Original Message-
From: "mike.wilson"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 05/02/04 09:31:40
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Digitial cameras - "must have" feature set
Hi,
Perhaps Mamiya 7 lenses are sharper?
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Strange, I've been achieving far sharper results with my Mamiya 7 gear when
hand holding than I ever did using the P67.
_
Add photos to your messages
not necessarily the "digital" stuff (and here I'm assuming you are referring
to the flash control); it's really the off-camera-TTL stuff that drives ya
nuts and is expensive!
Looking at B&H it's about US$100 for the 5P cord the off-camera-adapter F
and the hot shoe adapter Fg.
If you were going f
Sorry, it's late and I'm half asleep. You _will_ need another adaptor
for the camera. This digital stuff is _really_ expensive 8-)
m
Christian Skofteland wrote:
>
> Don't forget that to plug the 5p cable into the camera you are going to need
> the hot shoe adapter F or Fg.
>
> Christian Skoft
On 7 Feb 2004 at 12:44, Mark Roberts wrote:
> I've decided that rather than spend the really big $$$ for a 4000 dpi
> film scanner, I'll stick with the Scan Multi II for 12 x 16 and under
> prints and pay for professional drum scans on the very rare occasions
> that I want/need to go for really bi
The off camera adaptor has a 5P socket on the side, according to KMP.
m
Christian Skofteland wrote:
>
> Don't forget that to plug the 5p cable into the camera you are going to need
> the hot shoe adapter F or Fg.
>
> Christian Skofteland
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> - Original Message -
> F
I've lugged tripods and multiple cameras around the National Mall, inside
the Smithsonian and the National Zoo without anyone even blinking. When I'm
at the zoo I do my best to not get in anyone's way, especially kids trying
to see the animals.
The only place I was told to give up my cameras was
On 7 Feb 2004 at 11:48, William Robb wrote:
> Sure, it's big. It fills 2 hands for sure. It weighs close
> to 7 pounds with a lens and meter prism.
> But, all that weight gives it inertia.
> It doesn't really want to move.
Strange, I've been achieving far sharper results with my Mamiya 7 gear whe
On 7 Feb 2004 at 11:57, William Robb wrote:
> I haven't adjusted my technique for the new camera, which
> may be contributing to the mess my sensor is in.
> I routinely forget to turn the camera off before
> dismounting the lens, almost always have the lens pointing
> up when I remove it, and rare
duh! what color where the tops of the F*^&$%%^ feathers! ;-)
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 7:09 PM
Subject: RE: bird ID
> Yeah, it had some feathers.
>
> tv
>
>
Yeah, it had some feathers.
tv
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Skofteland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 7:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: bird ID
>
> did you see his tail when he flew away? ;-)
>
> Christian Skofteland
> [EMAIL PRO
Don't forget that to plug the 5p cable into the camera you are going to need
the hot shoe adapter F or Fg.
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: F
did you see his tail when he flew away? ;-)
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 5:27 PM
Subject: RE: bird ID
> -Original Message-
> > From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
mike wilson wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> > > > Also, I have about 150 polaroids from over 10
> > > > years ago stored away -
> > > > they are emitting a nasty odor when I open the
> > > > box...with no deterioration
> > > > of image.
> > >
> > > What sort of odour? Vinegary? Sulp
tom wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> > From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > > Maybe Tom could invite him/her back
> >
> > I did, but he hasn't rsvp'd.
>
> Well, he just showed up again-
Most of these types of museum rules were intended to ban flash. Which could
possibly damage something (think flashbulbs here), or annoy other visitors. It
is another one of those rules that has been expanded unthinkingly. Of course, at
museum's that want to sell you their post cards and books, i
Hi,
> Already done in the case of the National Trust. No photography at all
> allowed inside Trust buildings,
the same thing here in the National Maritime Museum - a complete ban
on photography - but no reasons given.
I've been stopped several times, and sometimes just 'reminded' even
though I
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > t> The first question I'm always asked down at the monuments
> > is "Is that
> > t> a professional camera?" The next question is "Do you have
> > a permit?"
> >
> >
> > No, sir, it is not a professio
This must have been since 9/11 because in early 2001, we went to DC, and I
was all over the place with a couple of cameras and some nice, long lenses
and no one ever said a word. The only place no cameras were permitted,
inside or out, was our tour of the White House. However, my husband did get
pu
dito,
I started playing around with fancy website stuff. Learned some interesting
new features.
But nothing for PUG for the time being. But we'll see.
Cheers
Adelheid
-Original Message-
From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Samstag, 7. Februar 2004 20:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"freedom" is open to interpretation
Norm
Anders Hultman wrote:
Herb Chong:
i have been told that in DC it is easy to get a permit. you just go
to some
place in the morning and pay a nominal fee and you had a permit for
the day.
What are these permits for, really? To me it sounds very ironic t
I work in an ad agency. We sometimes shoot in public parks. We might
have three grip trucks, a camera truck, and a crew of 30 or so. It kind
of spoils the park for everyone else. That's why you have to have a
permit to shoot commercial photography in a public park. (For a big
shoot like that, w
Hi Bruce,
on 07 Feb 04 you wrote in pentax.list:
>There have been previous threads on this. If I get a low battery
>reading, I turn the camera off and on and then it is ok again.
Yes, it's a known problem. It only occurs if you use rechargebles in the
camera _and_ the grip. AFAIK Pentax Japan is
William Robb wrote:
> My present heavyweight is the Manfrotto 028, which seems
> good under the 6x7, though the Zone VI Standard is still
> the best tripod I have used.
> I am a big fan of wood tripods.
Having compared the specification between the 055 and 028, I can see why.
Now to compare price
>
> On 7/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>
> >Cotty wrote:
> >
> >>>What Pentax glass does this fit? A* 300/2.8? FA* 250-600/5.6?
> >>>
> >>>If so, then I believe I'm interested.
> >>
> >> Good question - anyone know the filter sizes for the above lenses?
> >
> >112mm according to Boz's si
Whew! Thanks all who responded. I guess the shorter pin is normal. I
need the grip for a shoot today and I thought I was going to have to
deal with a potentially flakey grip.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
One of my pins is shorter also. It seems that when the power switches
between the body and grip, t
Robert,
Just took the D-BG1 Grip off my *ist D . . . one pin is definitly
about half the height of the others. It's the one in the middle row on
the left side as I look at it from the back.
IL Bill
On Saturday, February 7, 2004, at 12:41 PM, Robert Gonzalez wrote:
Does anyone here have the
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf"
Subject: Re: photographer arrested
> Commercial photography which rightly should require a
permit is easy to id.
>
> First clue, there is an equipment van. Second clue,
there are 2 to 30 people
> involved. Third clue is huge relectors and light
bloc
Creativity is a personal thing, and what is or isn't right will vary
depending who you talked to. However if you look at my original post on
this, I mention something about a "clear shot", referring to the window in
the way. However if Frank was on the ball, he would be prepared to take
another q
Hi,
>>i have been told that in DC it is easy to get a permit. you just go to some
>>place in the morning and pay a nominal fee and you had a permit for the day.
> What are these permits for, really? To me it sounds very ironic that
> you need a permit for photography in public places in "the la
Thanks for sharing, Cotty!
I have spent a day learning how NOT to shoot snow crystals...:-)
And then playing some online chess...
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pentax list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 8:24 PM
Subject
Anders Hultman wrote:
> To me it sounds very ironic that you need a permit for photography
> in public places in "the land of the free."
another HAR! is in order here .
" ... freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose"
Bill
---
On 7/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>There have been DSLRs around for a while now, just not Pentax. How in
>genral has the dust on the sesnosr pro=blem progressed for these "Older"
>DSLRs? (if anyone knows.)
I generally don't notice it - though I do clean about once every month or
so. It's
On 7/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>Hey, who's side are you one here! LOL :)
>-
>Anyone loitering at the DZ is likely to be
>at least informed of this interesting if illegal activity, if not part of
>it, and if I were a cop, I'd nick 'em!
Yeah but if I were a cop I'd
Shel wrote:
> Flash! Gimnme a break ... inappropriate for this kind of
> photo. Anyway, the shadow area plays an important part of
> the picture. IT adds a little tension, makes it real.
... not to mention the back-reflction off the window
might blind everyone in the bus, forc
TV , on National Parks & Cameras, wrote:
> The hearsay was basically that it was defined as commercial
> photography if you were using a "professional" camera.
HAR! ... just point to the Pentax on the prism, then!
*everyone* knows that only Canon & Nikon are professional
One of my pins is shorter than the others. It's at the end of the
middle row.
Paul
On Feb 7, 2004, at 1:41 PM, Robert Gonzalez wrote:
Does anyone here have the *istD grip that can check on something for
me? I noticed that one of the pins on my grip that connect to the
body is shorter than the
Saturday morning and it's bright and breezy in deepest Oxfordshire. Stef
and I went down to the river to see how much flooding there was from
recent rains.
www.macads.co.uk/snaps/spare.html
Hope your Saturday is going/went well...
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Not having a permit for what? Did they impute the whole offence to him
because
> he was engaged in a common enterprise or something? it seems rather
bizarre to
> me.
Hmm... You mean like conspiring to illegal parachuting?
I would say
On Feb 7, 2004, at 11:57 AM, Mark Cassino wrote:
I have a Manfrotto 3036 tripod and 3038 ball head, also old 3057 -
hopefully those will suffice.
Might need a new backpack, though...
I use the Manfroto 3036 tripod with my 6x7 (and my Speed Graphic) with
a 3047 three way head. I find the tripo
I scan my 6x7 negs on an Epson 3200, using the film holder. A 3200 dpi
scan in 48 bit yields a file of well over 200 megabytes. 18x13 prints
on my Epson 1200 are very finely detailed and extremely sharp. My only
bitch would be that the printer doesn't always handle shadows as well
as I'd like.
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> t> The first question I'm always asked down at the monuments
> is "Is that
> t> a professional camera?" The next question is "Do you have
> a permit?"
>
>
> No, sir, it is not a professional camera, see, it is
Hello,
I remember a thread from several weeks ago regarding FA 28-105 f/3.2 in
black finish. Looks like B&H will be stoking an imported version some time
soon. Price is still unavailable at this time, though I anticipate that it
will not be too much higher than current price this lens in silver fi
If you don't drink tea, perhaps this shot will convince you to try ;-)
http://www.elvum.net/gallery/barnes_flat/flat_chris
S
Herb Chong:
i have been told that in DC it is easy to get a permit. you just go to some
place in the morning and pay a nominal fee and you had a permit for the day.
What are these permits for, really? To me it sounds very ironic that
you need a permit for photography in public places in "the land
One of my pins is shorter also. It seems that when the power switches
between the body and grip, the readings can be odd. There have been
previous threads on this. If I get a low battery reading, I turn the
camera off and on and then it is ok again. Wish I could remember the
entire thread, but
Maybe it's just my mood today but...
Saturday, February 7, 2004, :49:59 AM, you wrote:
t> The easy answer is if there's an exchange of money, but other situations may
t> warrant it as well.
>> Just because your
>> equipment looks professional?
t> The first question I'm always asked down at t
Hadn't heard about that. The problem around here is that there are so many
jurisdictions...NPS, Capitol Police, DC Police, Military Police
tv
> -Original Message-
> From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 1:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subje
Does anyone here have the *istD grip that can check on something for me?
I noticed that one of the pins on my grip that connect to the body is
shorter than the others. I want to know if mine is defective or this is
normal.
I've been having problems with the grip such as it showing that it has
i have been told that in DC it is easy to get a permit. you just go to some
place in the morning and pay a nominal fee and you had a permit for the day.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 12:49 PM
Subject
Galen Rowell lost such a court case at least once. it was for a long time
"prove you will never sell any of these photos" and then we will give your
equipment and film back. if you could, sometimes, you got some of your
equipment back within a year. his climbing friends had lost several such
cases.
tom:
I seem to recall a story of some national park where you basically couldn't
do any shooting with a "nice" camera without a permit. The hearsay was
basically that it was defined as commercial photography if you were using a
"professional" camera.
I've been to several pop concerts lately where
>Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> I've decided that rather than spend the really big $$$ for a 4000 dpi
>> film scanner, I'll stick with the Scan Multi II for 12 x 16 and under
>> prints and pay for professional drum scans on the very rare occasions
>> that I want/need to go for really big prints. If that
"John Coyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thanks for the link Francis - the In-Cockpit video is particularly
>impressive. The pilot's heart must have been in his mouth when he realised
>he was too low for the manoeuvre.
Nah. Those guys are as cool as they come. Very well trained and
experience
N
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Mike Wilson posted:
> >
> > Looking through the pages at KMP and the Pentax download site, it seems
> > possible that the Off camera adaptor F (not the Hot shoe adaptor F) may
> > be what you need. It is not clear from the photgraph if it has the
> > ability to c
Hi,
Mark Roberts wrote:
> I've decided that rather than spend the really big $$$ for a 4000 dpi
> film scanner, I'll stick with the Scan Multi II for 12 x 16 and under
> prints and pay for professional drum scans on the very rare occasions
> that I want/need to go for really big prints. If that'
Backwards in time to the "guilty until proven innocent!"
-Original Message-
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 12:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: photographer arrested
the NPS service has, after many years, decided that it means you have
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Cassino"
Subject: Re: 6 x 7 Questions
> >The 6x7 is actually easier to hand hold than a 35mm,
>
> How's that? Looks like it would be pretty big...
Sure, it's big. It fills 2 hands for sure. It weighs close
to 7 pounds with a lens and meter prism.
But,
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton"
Subject: Re: Spots on my Shots
>
> What kind of lenses do you use? How often do you change
them.
I haven't adjusted my technique for the new camera, which
may be contributing to the mess my sensor is in.
I routinely forget to turn the camera
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Cassino"
> For 6 x 7 users - how are you out putting your stuff? I
have a Microtek
> flatbed scanner but assume that I'd need something
better for prints -
> maybe a scanning service? The local lab charges $40 a
frame for a high res
> scan - I hope they a
Commercial photography which rightly should require a permit is easy to id.
First clue, there is an equipment van. Second clue, there are 2 to 30 people
involved. Third clue is huge relectors and light blocking panals. 4th.. Props
and prop wranglers. Then there are all the talent hanging about.
Mike Wilson posted:
> Looking through the pages at KMP and the Pentax download site, it seems
> possible that the Off camera adaptor F (not the Hot shoe adaptor F) may
> be what you need. It is not clear from the photgraph if it has the
> ability to clip to a shoe. Eleanor?
>
In my other reply I
I had a dead mint example of the 55mm F3.5 SMC Takumar
and it was an OUTSTANDING lens. Only problem was the
100mm filter size. Beware of early non-smc versions.
I only paid $350 for mine and got $400 when I sold
it about 3 months ago.
JCO
---
At 04:08 AM 2/7/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Except that Tom said it was larger than a crow and sharp-shinns are pretty
small. Check your field guide again. Red Tails have horizontal bands on
the underside of their tails (the red is on top) and a rounded tail.
Sharp-shinned have a very squared off tai
At 07:41 PM 2/6/2004 -0600, William Robb wrote:
MLU cameras have more than just that as an advantage. They
also beefed up the film transport at that time, which
cured some other ills.
I'll most definitely be looking for a body with MLU.
The 6x7 is actually easier to hand hold than a 35mm,
How's t
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
