I put up a small page as a follow-up to my Happy Daze shot.
For me, the only two 'keepers' in the bunch are the original
Happy Daze shot (here shown as Chan2) and the picture of
Chan's owner (that is Spectator 2 Boris.) However, the gull
shot will go into my slowly building folder of wallpaper
What about places like Andorra or San Marino - they are tax (duty) free?
In Andorra, there are few taxes and the prices are much lower than in
France.
But Andorra is not in the European Union and the imports are subjected
to customs duties.
The rincipale customers are the French and Spanish trav
You certainly have an eye, Shel. Your snap shots make most planned
shots look bad.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/pianostrings.html
Saw some nice patterns in the piano strings. This is one of
the QuikSnaps® I took while hanging around Bonnie's place.
It's not as sh
This is simply incredible. Wonderful colors great sky.
Larry Hodgson wrote:
Here's one I shot last summer. Again this was done with a Nikon Coolpix 5700
before I had my *istD. Going back in the spring to shoot this area again
with the "D".
Comments welcome.
http://tripodman.smugmug.com/gallery
Very dramatic, and a little scary, looks like it might just fall over
and roll away.
Steve Jolly wrote:
http://www.elvum.net/gallery/paw/33_london_eye
My second PAW is one of several photos I like that were taken on a
twilight wander along the South Bank in London. Comments of any
descriptio
> >If so, what would be the best place to either buy or order a DSLR
> >from? Germany? Which store/online store? I know only Technikdirekt,
> >but I think there are cheapier.
What about places like Andorra or San Marino - they are tax (duty) free?
(*)o(*)
Robert
[EMA
Welcome to the Brotherhood, Mark! You may find the non-TTL finder just
fine, since the TTL meter is full-area averaging, and not as accurate as a
hand-held meter, in my experience, at least.
As for image quality, it's all there, but you may find all your errors are
more obvious as well. The shal
Lovely tones and you were right it was very tasteful. Damn and I was
hoping...
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I'm quite pleased with this shot. It was done by candle light with the
Pentax 6x7 and 105/2.4 lens. It displays full rear nudity, but I doubt
that any adults would consider it offensive. I've
Doesn't seem to be much of secret to me.
Norm Baugher wrote:
That's right, I guess we should welcome Mark into the brotherhood.
Welcome Mark [secret shutter shake]!
Norm
frank theriault wrote:
I guess you're now in the Brotherhood, eh Mark?
What an elegant image! It's nude, but non-carnal, showing pleasing lines
and form. The tan line's a little distracting, but overall, it's a nice
shot.
Pat White
It does include a lot of stuff. If it is really like new his
expectations might not be too high if he sold
each piece independently.
Norm Baugher wrote:
I think he'll be hanging on to this one just a bit longer
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3800614403&category=15240
It is nice.
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
I know sunsets are cliche and so on. But this one I think is a little
different.
http://boris.isra-shop.com/photos/basic-zoom/sunset.htm
My site is back up so I am posting the proper link...
All comments are most welcome.
Thanks in advance (even if you'd
I thought not but just to be sure I checked Boz's site. No.
Mark Cassino wrote:
At 09:05 PM 2/27/2004 +0100, you wrote:
I agree that the A20 f/2.8 is quite good, and the 28 f/2.0 too. I
had an M 24 2.8 that had too much for my taste.
DagT
Is there an M 24 f 2.8?
- MCC
-
Mark Cassino
AARRRGG...
Kenneth Waller wrote:
So I guess this is your (-- tah dah --) mirror image.
-Original Message-
From: William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PAW
Something a little different today.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/mirror1.html
And quite boring, I am sur
Maybe it's the minimumilist in me but I like it.
William Robb wrote:
Something a little different today.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/mirror1.html
And quite boring, I am sure.
Rip it apart folks.
William Robb
Robert,
The shot reminded me of an assignment I was on a while ago. Once everything
was integrated on the ship we had a party before departing the shipyard the
next day for Florida. The shipyard was close to New Orleans.
Anyhow, as we approached it the sight was amazing. I cannot recall how ma
Sometimes you have to make due with the background you get.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Other than the drain pipe in the background,i like it
Dave(cat person:-))Brooks
> Ok I figured I'd contribute to this and I would like
feedback
however there are a few things I don't want to he
There's a long term project that I'm working on which, in
part, involves photographing "found" or public art ...
murals, sculpture, paintings, etc. I usually carry the Sony
with me for quick shots and light hearted photo work. I
also use it to document subjects that I want to return to
for later
>In a message dated 2/27/2004 9:42:19 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>http://boris.isra-shop.com/photos/basic-zoom/sunset.htm
>My site is back up so I am posting the proper link...
>All comments are most welcome.
>Thanks in advance (even if you'd beat me to dust ).
>Boris
Thanks :-) You're right about the lack of sharpness - I have a horrible
feeling that the photo was taken with a Chinon 28-50 zoom that I valued
greatly for its lack of size at the time, but later realised was more
than a little lacking in the sharpness department too... I'm tempted to
rescan
Now, now. I meant that knowing us we would be up to the wee hours chatting
away. And as such I wanted to include the PDML and would be willing to
peddle to make that a possibility...
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
-Original Message-
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Se
I always enjoy hearing them say that the F-4 shows that with enough thrust,
even a brick can fly :-)
An excellent workhorse nonetheless.
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
P.S. The F-15, a flying tennis court. I was quite surprised the first time
I was able to stand between the tails of one. Talk abo
It was interesting to hear from those who worked with the F-4s when they
began using them as drones. Many felt bad that they were no longer in the
inventory.
When I first got here they were using F-106s as drones. I do not recall
when the last one was used up...
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
P.S.
In a message dated 2/26/2004 10:36:50 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>http://members.ozemail.com.au/~audiob/temp/_IGP0899m.jpg
>Rob Studdert
Whoa, that second one is really close-up. Kewl. Nice shot.
But I think you bug guys are sort of, er, ...weird. ;-)
Marnie aka Doe
Probably will ... lots of the digi photos are often just
"sketches" for later film pics.
Mark Dalal wrote:
>
> From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/pianostrings.html
> Nice Shel! I hope you are planning on reshooting that with film.
>In a message dated 2/27/2004 7:42:36 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Something a little different today.
>http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/mirror1.html
>And quite boring, I am sure.
Rip it apart folks.
>William Robb
Nothing to rip; nothing wrong with it.
But, yes,
Hello Derby,
The samples that Butch showed me, looked nice, but did not look like a
soft focus lens. Do you have any samples of this technique that I
could examine?
Thanks,
Bruce
No worries, Bruce. Here is a jpeg and it's original file for comparison.
I think this works best when the backg
No, I did. But I kind of messed up the order of things. Anyway, it's
all true.
paul
On Feb 27, 2004, at 9:30 PM, William Robb wrote:
I didn't write any of that.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
Subject: Re: PAW
On Feb 27, 2004, at 8:39 PM, William Robb wrote:
I
You forgot to include the URL
On Feb 27, 2004, at 9:41 PM, John Francis wrote:
OK - here's an image straight from the *ist-D.
I'm still trying to work out what to do to it (other than try
to fix the perspective distortion; I had to tilt the lens up
a bit). (The lens I used was the PZ 28-105).
E
Hi John ...
The technical data is awsome! Great description, well formated.
Just one thing, though, I'd suggest you crop the info and
include the pic
Seriously, no pic, no URL showed up in my email.
shel
John Francis wrote:
> OK - here's an image straight from the *ist-D.
>
> I'm still tryi
I agree, I would love to have been there with
my 8x10 camera and some ektachrome as well as
Tmax B&W.
JCO
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
-
OK - here's an image straight from the *ist-D.
I'm still trying to work out what to do to it (other than try
to fix the perspective distortion; I had to tilt the lens up
a bit). (The lens I used was the PZ 28-105).
Exposure set, manually, to 1/20 @ full aperture (f4.5);
ISO set to 800, and imag
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Hodgson"
Subject: PAW Arizona Landscape
> Here's one I shot last summer. Again this was done with a Nikon
Coolpix 5700
> before I had my *istD. Going back in the spring to shoot this area
again
> with the "D".
>
> Comments welcome.
Buy a view camera.
Y
I didn't write any of that.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
Subject: Re: PAW
>
> On Feb 27, 2004, at 8:39 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
> > I found this intriguing. It's an interesting combination of
ordinary
> > elements that causes one to stop and think. The unex
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Erickson"
Subject: warming polarizer and print film?
>
I don't know much about how print film
> responds, particularly to warming filters.
>
> Can anyone comment on what kind of differences I might expect
compared to,
> say, Velvia or E100VS?
Film is fi
On Feb 27, 2004, at 8:52 PM, Mark Cassino wrote:
Nicely done, Paul. The only distraction to my eye is the bright
reflection of the candle on the far left - sort of breaks up a the
nice repetition of the others. But that's pretty minor...
Yeah, I couldn't get them to burn even. That one on the
On Feb 27, 2004, at 8:39 PM, William Robb wrote:
I found this intriguing. It's an interesting combination of ordinary
elements that causes one to stop and think. The unexpected is always
interesting.
Paul
Nicely done, Paul. The only distraction to my eye is the bright reflection
of the candle on the far left - sort of breaks up a the nice repetition of
the others. But that's pretty minor...
- MCC
At 07:10 PM 2/27/2004 -0500, you wrote:
I'm quite pleased with this shot. It was done by candle lig
A stunning photograph. Beautiful light, gorgeous color, great
composition. It made my day. Thanks for posting it.
Paul
This one was taken at around 12 pm close to my home.
The exposure was about ten seconds, I pushed the
camera against the wall to serve as support. It was
taken with a camera my father gave me (it was his
camera when he was young. It's a Kinax Cadet from
1950. It's 6x9 and used 620 film. The lens i
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: RE: PAW
> I think it's pretty freaking cool!
>
> I think it might look even cooler in b&w. But, still, it's pretty
cool
> right now.
Thanks Frank.
Next week, the bannister..
The wall colour was my wife's choice, btw.
Sometimes
Some picture. Just great great.
Lasse.
From: "Larry Hodgson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 8:59 PM
Subject: PAW Arizona Landscape
> Here's one I shot last summer. Again this was done with a Nikon Coolpix 5700
> before I had my *istD. Going back in t
From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Mark Dalal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >One more for the week. This one was inspired by Shel. He sent me a
similar
> >shot and decided to try it also. This shot was taken while driving (with
> >both hands on the wheel).
>
> I'm not even going to *ask
Larry,
Simply gorgeous. Great light and composition.
Mark
I kind of like the tan lines. In any case, there wasn't much I could do
about them. Tan lines in December in Michigan. That takes some work :-)
I think the hand is overlit, but I like it's placement. I tried some
shots where I moved the candles to achieve different lighting, but the
overall eff
i think they are mostly pointless for print film unless you are talking
tungsten vs daylight exposures, and even then, a decent lab should be able
to correct away most of the difference. if all you are talking about are 81
filters, there isn't any point. maybe if you used 85 filters all the time,
b
What did you order?
Norm
I understand that their daily special is the ACME coyote pancake.
Butch
Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself.
Hermann Hesse (Demian)
Nicely done, I agree with Rob, the hand doesn't seem to fit itdon't
like the tan line as well.
Norm
Rob Studdert wrote:
I like it, the only negative distraction (to me) are the hard lines caused by
the lighting of her hand. A little a more light on the lower legs would have
been good too b
All,
I've been using Kodak Portra 400UC for snapshots lately and am pretty happy
with its color palette. I'm thinking about using it as a general travel
film and am wondering how it responds to filtering (as compared to slide
film). I have a bit of experience with filtration (e.g., ND Grads,
On 27 Feb 2004 at 19:10, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I'm quite pleased with this shot. It was done by candle light with the
> Pentax 6x7 and 105/2.4 lens. It displays full rear nudity, but I doubt
> that any adults would consider it offensive. I've posted it here
> because I think it's a nice examp
the Pentax RAW conversion software offers more sharpening than the camera
does.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pentax list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: *ist D & Formula 1 tests
> >Yes, but the highest lev
it's too bad you didn't shoot RAW, there is enough room to boost the
saturation a lot without too much artifacting in the sky. even if there is,
much of the resulting chroma noise can be removed with a good noise filter.
send me the original and i'll see what i can do.
Herb...
- Original Messa
I'm quite pleased with this shot. It was done by candle light with the
Pentax 6x7 and 105/2.4 lens. It displays full rear nudity, but I doubt
that any adults would consider it offensive. I've posted it here
because I think it's a nice example of what can be done with unusual
lighting. Of course
Ditto.
frank theriault wrote:
Awesome!!
Awesome!!
-frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PAW - sunset
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 19:45:16 +02
Nice pics, Mark. I love 6702. Great definition. I wouldn't split hairs
over the difference in the two 55mm lenses. It's probably inivisible to
the naked eye. I've been playing with my *istD for a couple of weeks
now, but you just motivated me to get the 6x7 out. For handheld cameras
it doesn't
That's right, I guess we should welcome Mark into the brotherhood.
Welcome Mark [secret shutter shake]!
Norm
frank theriault wrote:
I guess you're now in the Brotherhood, eh Mark?
No, no, no (I say that with respect and love, Boros )
Simple is good. At least in this case it is. Maybe that's why I said
earlier that it might work in B&W, because that would be even simpler - no
colours. Strip away everything superfluous, and get to the essence of the
mirror and the hook.
I think it's pretty freaking cool!
I think it might look even cooler in b&w. But, still, it's pretty cool
right now.
cheers,
frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pretty impressive for "outakes" that are much softer than the negs in the
loupe!
I guess you're now in the Brotherhood, eh Mark?
cheers,
frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Mark Cassino <[EMAIL P
On 27/2/04, LARRY disgorged:
>Here's one I shot last summer. Again this was done with a Nikon Coolpix 5700
>before I had my *istD. Going back in the spring to shoot this area again
>with the "D".
>
>Comments welcome.
>
>http://tripodman.smugmug.com/gallery/65384/1/2589664/Original
>
>Larry from Pr
Shel,
Just so you know, I was laughing at your comment that you ate next door at
the Sushi place, and not at the Burrito place. I thought that was funny.
Don't know why, but I did.
Look forward to seeing your sunset shot of that sign. Should look good.
Just have a few more sakes first, so
Oh, you mean the hole that you er, the hole that is er, I mean, oh -
*that* hole!
On 27/2/04, MIKE THE MECHANIC disgorged:
>I think it fell out of the hole in me trouser pocket. I'm really,
>really sorry.
>
>Cotty wrote:
>>
>> On 27/2/04, WOULD LOSE HIS HEAD IF NOT SCREWED ON disgorged:
>>
>>
I think it fell out of the hole in me trouser pocket. I'm really,
really sorry.
Cotty wrote:
>
> On 27/2/04, WOULD LOSE HIS HEAD IF NOT SCREWED ON disgorged:
>
> >It's gone.
>
> Mike, honestly - you only just had it. Now where were you? You popped
> into the kitchen to make a cup of tea, then
> the A20 f/2.8 is quite good, and the 28 f/2.0 too
Which 28/2 ? The K 28/2 or the M/A 28/2 ?
Fred
I bought this lens some time ago on ebay for a paltry $50, thinking I
could get a good walking around lens with a fabulous focal range, but it
is worth about that much. It is quite soft. I guess it has its uses.
I used it to take my PUG entry for Feb, but only because I happened to
have that
I really like including just a sliver of land at the bottom of the frame
with the sky fading off into the darkness. Really makes me feel like the
night is pressing in...
- MCC
At 07:45 PM 2/27/2004 +0200, you wrote:
Hi!
I know sunsets are cliche and so on. But this one I think is a little
diff
Really lush colors and textures - great shot!
- MCC
At 11:59 AM 2/27/2004 -0700, you wrote:
Here's one I shot last summer. Again this was done with a Nikon Coolpix 5700
before I had my *istD. Going back in the spring to shoot this area again
with the "D".
Comments welcome.
http://tripodman.smugm
I love it when things come together...
Yesterday the postal service jeep pulled up into the driveway and the mail
carrier brought two packages. One was the 6x7 system I bought from a list
member, which includes the 6x7 w/ MLU, standard (non-ttl) finder, and a 105
f2.4 and 150 f2.8 lens. The o
Actually John, I think that you need to know a fair amount
about any complex mechanism to best make use of it. Be it a
camera or a computer or a form of operating system or an
application or utility. DOS/Windows (and CPM before them)
have just made different assumptions about the user than the
Which 20/24/28 primes show the least?
-Lon
The A20mm f/2.8 seems good. I tend to be pretty sensitive to barrel
distortion, and I have used the 20 pretty extensively ove rthe past
few months with the home reno pictures, and nothing has jumped out at
me.
I agree that the A20 f/2.8 is quite good, and
Keith Whaley wrote:
> In my experience, if you try to avoid vertical lines at the left and
> right edges of the scene, you'll love it.
> I know that sounds logical, but you'd be surprised.
Judging by Wheatfield's HomeRenovation Updates there were
very few true vertical lines lef
På 27. feb. 2004 kl. 20.39 William Robb:
- Original Message -
From: "Lon Williamson"
Subject: Which wide Pentax primes show the least distortion?
Looks like a few have problems with barrel distortion.
Which 20/24/28 primes show the least?
-Lon
The A20mm f/2.8 seems good. I tend to be prett
As part of my plan to learn to repair old pentax stuff, I just got
a Spotmatic SP, a Spotmatic F, and an SMCT 300/4.0 from KEH in
"as is" condition. Both bodies were "inop", although I have yet to
find anything wrong with the F. The SP mirror and aperture stopdown
hangs up at slow shutter speeds
Hi,
> If anyone can simply give me an answer to some of the questions I've raised
> or direct me to a primer that will help me understand the Mac's better I'd
> greatly appreciate it.
these 2 books might be useful:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0321168895/103-4897021-8602210?v=gla
In my experience, if you try to avoid vertical lines at the left and
right edges of the scene, you'll love it.
I know that sounds logical, but you'd be surprised.
If you keep thinking of what emphasizes the barrel distortion, and stay
away from it, you'll like it a lot more. . . Keep it level as p
I couldn't hep but notice, in the latest flare-up of Mac
advocacy, that once again one of the purported strengths
of the Mac is that you don't have to understand the inner
workings to be able to use the machine sucessfully.
Oddly enough the same argument can be applied to cameras,
but the suggest
Wow! Very nice. Looks like you captured this in perfect light. You
must have staked out the shot earlier - composition is great and the
sky cooperated. Great job!
Bruce
Friday, February 27, 2004, 10:59:37 AM, you wrote:
LH> Here's one I shot last summer. Again this was done with a Nikon Co
- Original Message -
From: "Lon Williamson"
Subject: Which wide Pentax primes show the least distortion?
> Looks like a few have problems with barrel distortion.
> Which 20/24/28 primes show the least?
>
> -Lon
The A20mm f/2.8 seems good. I tend to be pretty sensitive to barrel
distort
"Mark Dalal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>One more for the week. This one was inspired by Shel. He sent me a similar
>shot and decided to try it also. This shot was taken while driving (with
>both hands on the wheel).
I'm not even going to *ask* what you pressed the shutter button with.
>It's th
Dag T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>William Robb wrote:
>
>> Something a little different today.
>>
>> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/mirror1.html
>>
>> And quite boring, I am sure.
>> Rip it apart folks.
>>
>I liked that one. There is some strange sense of humor at work here.
>A bit weird.
Larry,
What great colors! Super shot. Unfortunately, I suspect the web and my monitor
don't do it the justice it deserves ... and it still looks great! You clearly
got it right!
shel
Larry Hodgson wrote:
> Here's one I shot last summer. Again this was done with a Nikon Coolpix 5700
> before
On 27/2/04, WOULD LOSE HIS HEAD IF NOT SCREWED ON disgorged:
>It's gone.
Mike, honestly - you only just had it. Now where were you? You popped
into the kitchen to make a cup of tea, then you went into the bog...
Is it down the back of the settee?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/pianostrings.html
Saw some nice patterns in the piano strings. This is one of
the QuikSnaps® I took while hanging around Bonnie's place.
It's not as sharp as I'd like since the exposure was long
and I had no tripod, but you might like the pattern made by
the s
On 27/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>I'm trying to get mySO to let me grow mine like that,but no luck so far.
>Other than the bright engine people have mentioned, its a great shot,Cotty.
>
>Dave
>
> > Okay, in an effort to steer away from car
>threads
On 27/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>Something a little different today.
>
>http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/mirror1.html
>
>And quite boring, I am sure.
>Rip it apart folks.
>
>William Robb
Bill, that's a beautiful pic. I really like it. Needs the bottom of the
mirror though to be perfe
On 27/2/04, EHH WHAT'S UP DOC? disgorged:
>LOL
>
>>>Yes, but the highest level of sharpening that the *istD offers, sharpens
>>>less than Canon's normal or even low setting.
>>Interesting. Do you have any references to substantiate this?
>
>Hm, I don't have a D60 to compare ;-) but I remember to h
On 27/2/04, STAN DA MAN disgorged:
> c. Using OS9.x and earlier Mac systems, you periodically
>need to do something called "cleaning the desktop folder."
>Think of it like flushing the cache on a web browser. To do
>this on the Mac, you hold down a special key combination
>during start-u
Here's one I shot last summer. Again this was done with a Nikon Coolpix 5700
before I had my *istD. Going back in the spring to shoot this area again
with the "D".
Comments welcome.
http://tripodman.smugmug.com/gallery/65384/1/2589664/Original
Larry from Prescott
The only Sun lens I owned was a 60-135/3.5 zoom, back in the early 80s. It
was horrible, producing soft images with an unappealling greenish cast. I
gave it away, with a suitable warning. I think Sun was a lesser-known
3rd-party brand back then, but I hadn't heard or seen the name in at least
15
Your welcome.
Andy Chang wrote:
Peter,
Thank you ever so much
Time for reading now
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 1:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SUN 24/2.5 lens
You can find a great deal of
Of course the alcohol boils off before the water so you're actually diluting the
stuff.
Call yourself hard ;)
Nick
-Original Message-
From: "Cotty"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 24/02/04 15:17:50
Dahhh. You're all a bunch of wusses. I take a glass, boil the rest of the
w
You mean for brown, white & pink shoes?
Thanks Boris!
Working has taken most of my time so I sometimes go up to the roof and
look around to see what's going on around the office building
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 2:11 AM
To: Andy Chang
Subje
Hi Mark ...
You've got a good idea here, but I think this shot fails to make the cut.
Apart from the element you'd like to clone out, the object in the background
is very distracting. It looks like another guitar string post. Softer bokeh
might get it to work a little better, or maybe going the
Hi!
FW> Thanks for the kind comments. Kelly, my model, is a very cute
FW> two year old with wonderful facial expressions - plus she enjoys
FW> being photographed and is happy to sit still long enough for the
FW> shot. She featured in my entry to February's PUG, and again for
FW> March.
Fred, you
Hey Folks,
One more for the week. This one was inspired by Shel. He sent me a similar
shot and decided to try it also. This shot was taken while driving (with
both hands on the wheel). It's the craziest one of all the frames I took.
Hope you enjoy:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2167
Hi!
Ib> I read a few books and watched postings to try learn the tricks of doing
Ib> these long night exposures.
Ib> Amateur as I am, but eager to learn from the myriads of those clearly less
Ib> amateur than I, I'd love
Ib> to receive your advice on what to do better.
Ib> Weather was "muggy", te
Hey Folks,
Here's one I need some help on. I'm wondering if I should crop it tighter.
There's an element in the middle left side of the photo I'm wondering if I
should clone out. Ditch it altogether and try again?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2167370
Thanks,
Mark
I liked that one. There is some strange sense of humor at work here.
A bit weird.
A small objection to the pink colour.
DagT
På 27. feb. 2004 kl. 16.41 skrev William Robb:
Something a little different today.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/mirror1.html
And quite boring, I am sure.
Rip
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
