- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Subject: Pentax Fish-eye Takumar 17/4.0 and Kiron 28/2.0 (K)
Hi,
One of each of these is coming my way. What are your opinions on
them?
The 17/f4 is a fun little lens.
Be careful that the rotating filter collar is actually on a
On 4/3/04,MALCOLM disgorged:
There seem to be no end of these viruses now. I can see me partitioning the
hard disc and running Linux on one part for e-mail. My laptop is really on
it's last legs now and I would like a Mac to replace it. The only niggle is
the lack of floppy disc drive - and many
On 4/3/04, THE GRIM REAPER ;-) disgorged:
I don't know whether or not the message I sent yesterday, before
Roadrunner
decided to block the PDML server, made it through or not.
Anyhow, this year's Grandfather Mountain Nature Photo Weekend is sold out
and no more registrations will be
Leica + purchase = poverty.
LOL.
Pentax + purchase = nostalgia
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free UK Mac Ads http://www.macads.co.uk
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 9:39 PM
Subject: PAW: fresh out of scanner
Hi!
This 85 soft is one versatile lens. Took it for a walk to a local
reserve that is being re-built. Crawled on the sand and here are two
samples:
His first statement:
Hockney told the Guardian newspaper that photographs can be so easily
altered these days that they can no longer be seen as factual or true.
is crap!
I've said it before and I'll continue to say it: ALL PHOTOGRAPHS ARE
MANIPULATED.
It happens before the shutter is tripped
On 4/3/04, MARNIE THE FONDLER disgorged:
10D's, etc. D's, Nikon 70D (or whatever)? And not to mention all the
digital PS.
Are most people cool about letting you hold and fondle their cameras?
S'okay with me, as long as I get furtive grope as well...
Yeah no problem at all Marn...
Cheers,
On 4/3/04, SHEL disgorged:
I'd like to take another look at the Setright pic you posted
a week or two back. Can you provide a URL?
Tks!
Sure.
Er, what it a Setright pic?
Sorry, I'm being dumb here. Remind me
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
Anyone can feel free to send me a URL to their website and i will update
the list.
The list has beem updated a number of times, last time roughly 6 months ago.
Regards,
Paul
graywolf wrote:
Pretty much out of date, I think.
That seems to be the problem with most of the lists relating to this
So called macro viruses will if you have vba on your system.
Cotty wrote:
On 4/3/04, GRAYWOLF disgorged:
Probably wouldn't make a difference if you were using Windows on a Power PC.
Actually I have heard tell that a PC virus will infect the Windows
environment on a Mac running a PC
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Dave,
In what way don't your pictures look good?
Sharpness.Boris's soft lens photo looks better than my regular lenses,when scanning
35mm
film.
What is lacking do you mean?
Nice colour,sharp images.Closenes to the original proof.I'm sure its how i do
Nifty, Dag. Very nifty.
Dag T wrote:
I agree, totally.
At the danger of boring everybody I can refer to my unmanipulated
portfolio on Photo.net:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder.tcl?folder_id=366144
None of them are manipulated according to photo.net rules:
Cotty wrote:
On a Mac G4 running OS 10.2.6, the Dock's icon animation can be turned off?
How?
keith whaley
Dock Preferences Keith.
Cheers,
Cotty
Sorry, Cot, ol' man. . .not so. Not on MY computer!
In Dock Preferences, I have, in order:
Dock size -Small to Large
Cotty wrote:
Malc, external USB floppy disk drives can be purchased and
will work on a Mac as well as a PC. May I make a suggestion?
If you have a computer, I would hope that you would be
backing up at the very least all the user data you create?
Oh yes! Having learnt the hard way, once a
On 4/3/04, SHEL disgorged:
The guy with the beard at the auto show - wasn't that LJK
Setright, the automotive journalist? Sorry if I was a bit
cryptic ... anyway, that's the one I'd like to take another peek
at.
With you now. I forgot that was his name.
Some of us have more time than money, Cotty. Sneaker net is still the cheapest
WAN. Interesting, I have a LAN, but nothing to plug into it any more. Of course
there is the school of thought that if they are not on the internet they are too
primative to worry about anyway (g).
--
Cotty wrote:
inline
Cotty wrote:
On 4/3/04, GRAYWOLF disgorged:
Probably wouldn't make a difference if you were using Windows on a Power PC.
Actually I have heard tell that a PC virus will infect the Windows
environment on a Mac running a PC emulator software. I have no idea how
true that is.
HAR. Yes,
In a message dated 3/4/2004 11:51:47 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Umm, how can you see the fellow's neck? It's covered with
a scarf.
There's more to see in the pic than the person in the
foreground.
Glad you like it, though ;-))
I have a good imagination. :-) I think a
Should be fun, what's the transport plan? How many people are riding
with you? Should we plan on a DC-PDML Convoy?
Geoff
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 10:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Sold Out - GFM, Just made it
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Moes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should be fun, what's the transport plan?
IIRC, leave Friday around 10:30 a.m. (we're bringing Ledo's Pizza), return
Sunday night.
Is that right Cotty? Or were we coming back Monday? I forget. Cotty's plane
tix
Since this seems to be such a popular topic, I humbly offer up the following
self-authored how-to guide for your perusal and implementation:
www.reed-electronics.com/ednmag/article/CA330074
Based on a Fujitsu Lifebook-P2040 running Windows XP Professional, but most
of the techniques discussed
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2183396
I know, the bikes in the background really distract from the hand in the
trap (it's a plastic hand, for you squeamish ones out there g). They (the
bikes) ~really~ pissed me off, after I noticed them.
They're Bike Cop bikes, BTW, which was
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, William Robb wrote:
The 17/f4 is a fun little lens.
Be careful that the rotating filter collar is actually on a filter,
Thanks for this (and all the other comments; it seems noone has the
Kiron). Is what you are referring to above the same business as in the
K18/3.5?
I'll try that next time, Jens. Thanks for the tip. I'm trying something
new here (doing concerts, that is), so any help is appreciated.
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Jens Bladt
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I found that on the ST 20/4,5 and the three examples of the K20/4.0 that
I had (still have one) the sharpness at the edges diminishes substantially, to
the point of a soft blur in some cases. I've made a lot of pics with those
lenses, and when
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 21:38:02 -, you wrote:
I was not impressed to be told I couldn't have a 5.5 inch
drive. I have stacks of those, including a copy of Windows v2.0, in those
dark days before the launch of 3.1 which made it famous. I collect and enjoy
using old software. Someone has too ;-)
Marnie aka Doe wrote:
Beautiful. Makes me want to go to the Southwest again. (But with a camera
this time). Almost looks medium format with the breadth and depth that it
has.
Very nice shot.
Marnie aka Doe (Envious.)
Thanks a lot Marnie.
Keith Whaley wrote:
How is it in Prescott, Larry?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am likely to see everything digital at GFM, right? *istD's, Canon 60D's,
10D's, etc. D's, Nikon 70D (or whatever)? And not to mention all the digital PS.
Are most people cool about letting you hold and fondle their cameras?
Marnie aka Doe It could be the perfect
Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/arts/3532483.stm
What a pathetic load of twaddle. (I'm being polite here.)
First quotation is an outright falsehood: ...it won't be made the way
Cartier-Bresson made his. We know he didn't crop them.
Then he goes on with
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2147727size=lg
Back in 2000 we spent our vacation exploring the Canadian Maritimes.
One of the places we stopped at was the fishing village of Cheticamp,
on the north west coast of Cape Breton Island. This shot is
of one the local crab fishing boats
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody has yet released an LX-D kind of camera. At the rate things
are
going, the first company to make anything like that (old-fashion look
and
feel, digital guts) is going to be Cosina.
Unless you specifically meant an SLR, I hear Leica
Sorry, DJE,
I forgot you haven't been with us for that long. There's a pic of me
floating around out there somewhere (I thought I had bookmarked it, but
apparently not). In said, photo, I sport a lovely pair of rabbit ears. It
seems to have become a conversation piece over the years.
So,
You pick one of your pictures (one that you typically had difficulties in
gettng right), fresh out of the scanner - send it in a reasonable size to a
number of volunteers on the list (I'll be one of them) who will do their
finishing and adjustments according to their taste (no competition).
The
On 4 Mar 2004 at 9:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The LX was, unfortunately, unique for Pentax. It was pretty much unique
entirely with that electro-mechanical shutter and moronic strap/grip system.
I suspect the LX's moronic grip/strap system to which you refer was modelled
upon that found on
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Pentax Fish-eye Takumar 17/4.0 and Kiron 28/2.0 (K)
One of each of these is coming my way. What are your opinions on
them?
Just making conversation,
Kostas
I've got a 17/4.0 super-tak (I'd really like the SMC if I could find
and
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.leica-camera.com/digitalekameras/digilux2/index_e.html
I was thinking an SLR, but this thing is a SIGNIFICANT
improvement over the first Leica/Panasonic digital thingie
from what I can see.
I
Of course you can make a big prime or a small zoom. If your Pentax 24-90
were an f/1.8, and of equal optical quality to the Sigma 24/1.8, and still
smaller, THEN I'd be amazed. There are plenty of 28-xx zooms smaller than
my 28/1.4 Nikkor. I think there are CARS smaller than my 28/1.4 Nikkor.
On 4 Mar 2004 at 11:55, keller.schaefer wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice if there was a web page with a compilation of links to all
the sites where list members store their PAWs (something like an extra column to
the PUG list of member's sites)? I then could bookmark only this page and browse
from
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: clever virus attack
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Probably wouldn't make a difference if you were using Windows on a Power
PC.
Most of
I love it. I really like the dangling hand, it looks like part of the
bike in the background, at first I thought it was some wierd bike stand.
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2183396
I know, the bikes in the background really distract from the hand in
Hi DJE,
I have installed myself a K1000 splitscreen in my SP1000 spottie. The
screen is definitely much brighter (I have gotten is as a part from
local pentax repair shop), and actually makes focusing spotties in dim
light feasible. I would compare it in ease of focus to an ME Super. In
my
On 4 Mar 2004 at 17:49, frank theriault wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2183396
Gotta love the sheep skin boots(?) on one protester :-)
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have updated the PDML Members website list, any links that were dead
have been culled and a few more entries have been added.
If you'd like your page added then please email the URL off list.
http://www.nrg666.com/pdml
Regards,
Paul
Gonz (or rg),
That's the damn problem! Were it not for the bikes, one would be better
able to tell it's a dangling hand in a leg-hold trap. I didn't even notice
the bikes on the contacts, but once it were blowed up, there they were.
Still, I kind of like her expression. They were all quite
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: Hockney on photography
To quote a noted PDML'er: Why is photography the only art form for
which some neurotics demand something called truth? - Bob Blakely
(The answer: Because they're neurotic, elitist and more than a
little
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, do you know why they chose BSD rather than Linux for the basis of OS X?
I'd suggest that it has to do with Nextstep, which was the previous
attempt to put Mac over unix. Apparently there are a lot of extensions
to Unix underneath OSX prefaced with ns. Linux is
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2183396
Gotta love the sheep skin boots(?) on one protester :-)
I was thinking that the coat she's wearing is of the suede leather and fur
variety...must be fake though huh? I hope...
Cory
wants to
It's far easier to significantly alter a photograph today than it was
in days past. That's all he's saying. It's not crap. It's fact.
On Mar 4, 2004, at 3:29 PM, Christian wrote:
His first statement:
Hockney told the Guardian newspaper that photographs can be so easily
altered these days that
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Subject: Re: Pentax Fish-eye Takumar 17/4.0 and Kiron 28/2.0 (K)
Be careful that the rotating filter collar is actually on a
filter,
Thanks for this (and all the other comments; it seems noone has the
Kiron). Is what you are
OK, somebody here might have given me a line on an M20/4.0, but if it pans
out I need to know if I really want to buy it.
Looking at Boz's site it is really small and cute, ideal for travel
IF it is a decent performer. Shel has already suggested that the K20/4
is weak at the edges as was its
I have the following cameras and lenses for sale:
Pentax Z-1 AF SLR + Fdp Gripstrap + F electronic cable release +
instruction manual, in Spanish (I will also include 2 unused 2CR5
lithium batteries, each one lasts about twenty-five 36-exposure films).
The camera is in excellent condition, both
- Original Message -
From: Christian
Subject: Re: Hockney on photography
His first statement:
Hockney told the Guardian newspaper that photographs can be so
easily
altered these days that they can no longer be seen as factual or
true.
is crap!
I've said it before and I'll
On 4 Mar 2004 at 18:50, William Robb wrote:
What is happening though, is that one can no longer trust a
photograph to be a reflection of reality, no matter the motive of the
photographer.
As that moron boy at the LA times proved, it is just too easy to
alter reality to suit ones own agenda.
You pick one of your pictures (one that you typically had difficulties in
getting right), fresh out of the scanner - send it in a reasonable size to
a
number of volunteers on the list (I'll be one of them) who will do their
finishing and adjustments according to their taste (no competition).
The
i don't remember MS allowing the end user to configure what constituted
Level 1. a lot of angry users called up to ask what happened to their
attachments for several months.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: David Miers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04,
Don't get me started on the LX. Why else could you explain my having five
of them?
No infatuation at all,
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
-Original Message-
From: Andy Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 2:44 AM
I only recently got hold a LX, I don't think I'll
-Original Message-
From: Christian Skofteland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 7:34 AM
- Original Message -
From: Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 12:30 AM
Oh Cesar Cesar Cesar. ¡Que lastima que no tienes camera
moderna!
But
Geoff,
If nothing else I can sit with her and hear of your travels south.
You know you can trust me,
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Moes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 10:18 AM
After contemplating it and seeing some of the
I like the shot because Tracy's Canadian, and he won the championship. I
don't really care if it were close or not. g
Nice shot, but just to niggle a bit, I wish it had more motion in it. The
track's sharp, the cars are sharp - the only slight indication of movement
is the blur of the white
At 10:43 AM 3/4/2004, Shel wrote:
Just a little experiment on a couple of levels ...
http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/shattuck1.html
comments, as always, welcome ...
Let me guess... Shattuck Allston? A block or so either side of Center
Street? Both the guy and the photo lab across the
Wow!!
Look at those eyes! Great grab, John!
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: John Mustarde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW: This ain't
Don't kid yourself, Dave,
I think it's a great shot. Really like the reflection at the top - can't
quite figure out what it is, but it makes you look! vbg
Lovely colours - I like the way the whole scene is saturated with orange.
A different flower pic - I like it!
cheers,
frank
The optimist
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 10:23 AM
From: Cesar Matamoros II [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Okay Frank,
Which one would you take? I just had to do this...
Spotmatic SP
SV
S1a
S1a
A3
K1000
MX
MV
ME Super
ME F
Super
Marnie,
I know that the PDMLers are... I try to bring most of my gear so that those
who wish can try what they may want...
I can think of a couple of PDMLers who will have non-Pentax DSLRs there,
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 3:20 PM
On 4/3/04, THE GRIM REAPER ;-) disgorged:
I don't know whether or not the message I sent yesterday, before Roadrunner
decided to block the PDML server, made it through or not.
Anyhow, this
Geoff,
You understand if I, as honorary DCPDMLer, do not make the convoy?
Traveling from the south,
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Moes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 5:14 PM
Should be fun, what's the transport plan? How many people
As a pure composition (I don't know how better to put it), it's
interesting. The shape of his dark jacket against the brighter background,
heavy at the bottom of the frame, lighter at the top.
As a human photograph, I'm not so sure. I'm guessing he's sleeping, due
to the way he's slumped
Most of the folks I have met from Vega IV have been somewhat weird.
--
frank theriault wrote:
Rob, Cory,
Yeah, they both said they were vegans, and only wore clothing from
non-animal derived sources.
I believed them; they seemed to be quite genuine.
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is
See?
LOL!
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sometimes you just run into a strange scene
Date: Mon, 01
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 5:27 PM
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Moes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should be fun, what's the transport plan?
IIRC, leave Friday around 10:30 a.m. (we're bringing Ledo's Pizza), return
Pentax (P)Z1 Camera: with dateback and operating manual, exc cond.
Pentax (P)Z-1(P) gripstrap, boxed, exc cond.
Pentax FA28-70 f4, boxed, as new, with Hoya Pro-1 52mm filter (12 layer
coating)
Tokina 19-35 f3.5-4.5, boxed, as new, with optional accessory flower shaped
hood and 67mm filter
Pentax
tom wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Moes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just out of curiosity, how many other's have SO's coming who are not
planning to attend the presentations? #7 is waffling
tv
You mean 7 doesn't want to be 7 of 9 ??? ;)
ann
-Original Message-
From: Cesar Matamoros II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tv,
Tsk, tsk, tsk. You know that I would take care of her for you...
Just keep her out of the bear pen. She might think they're ponies and try to
ride them.
tv
Does someone on the list have any info/knowledge about Rolleiflex TLR
cameras?Dear friend's deceased partner's hidden('til now)locker has revealed
a Rollei in excellent (to my eye)condition black with a brown case with dual
lens cover and nicely functioning hood/focussing/knobs/functions etc
Hi Nenad,
I'm interested in the AF280T flash and the AF1.7X teleconverter.
How much are you asking for them? I'm in Taiwan
Thanks a lot
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Nenad Djurdjevic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Oops, sorry, it should have been off list
DOH!
Andy
Hi!
LK (Sorry Boris for stealing your thread in a previous message
LK of mine to Dave without changing the subject line. (Tried to make
LK it right in another message.) )
Apology accepted. Indulgence (something from Inquisition era, right?!)
granted g.
LK If I have to pick one of the pictures,
Hi!
Dave, I always scan negatives.
I also like one with the flower more, but the more abstract one is
still very fascinating.
Thanks!
Boris
I received the exact same e-mail but knew it had to be false so I forwarded
it to my e-mail server and asked for confirmation.
David Madsen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.davidmadsen.com
-Original Message-
From: Stan Halpin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, DJE,
I forgot you haven't been with us for that long. There's a pic of me
floating around out there somewhere (I thought I had bookmarked it, but
apparently not). In said, photo, I sport a lovely pair of rabbit ears.
It seems to have become a
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4 Mar 2004 at 9:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The LX was, unfortunately, unique for Pentax. It was pretty much unique
entirely with that electro-mechanical shutter and moronic strap/grip system.
I suspect the LX's moronic grip/strap system to which you
On Mar 5, 2004, at 12:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, do you know why they chose BSD rather than Linux for the basis
of OS X?
I'd suggest that it has to do with Nextstep, which was the previous
attempt to put Mac over unix. Apparently there are a lot of extensions
to Unix underneath OSX
On Mar 5, 2004, at 05:21, graywolf wrote:
I glanced at the source code. Your scripting software seems to produce
very clean code. What are you using?
Long story...
I couple of years ago I wanted to build a photo database, and I also
wanted to learn about cgi-bin programming. So I married the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, do you know why they chose BSD rather than Linux for the basis of OS X?
I'd suggest that it has to do with Nextstep, which was the previous
attempt to put Mac over unix. Apparently there are a lot of extensions
to Unix underneath OSX prefaced with ns. Linux is
Windows 2.0 came with two kernals an 8086/8088 version and the 286
version. It would recognize which
processor and how much memory you had available at load time and loaded
the proper version.
Herb Chong wrote:
i'm pretty sure Windows 1 never shipped standalone. i still have the disks
to a
Godd luck - it's a lot of fun. If you shoot black and white and even color
negs, you can reduce contrast by undereksposing (minus correktion) in
combination with over development. As an example exposing a 200 iso film
like it is 400 iso, then developing it like 500-600 ASA. You might want to
do
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Had to think about that for a bit. But then it came to me that the guys who make
catalog sketches and such are considered artists.
So why not photographers? Maybe because of the perception that anybody can do
it? But then that is not true. Anybody can
You're right about the bikes Frank, but over all not bad for newspaper
work. Hell real good for newspaper work.
frank theriault wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2183396
I know, the bikes in the background really distract from the hand in
the trap (it's a plastic hand, for
I like the wash of color, you captured the end of day colors perfectly.
Fred Widall wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2147727size=lg
Back in 2000 we spent our vacation exploring the Canadian Maritimes.
One of the places we stopped at was the fishing village of Cheticamp,
on the
On Mar 5, 2004, at 01:47, Keith WHALEY wrote:
FACT:
Just like the new XP interface, the Dock animation can be turned off.
On a Mac G4 running OS 10.2.6, the Dock's icon animation can be turned
off?
How?
Hmm, I wonder if turning it off is a new feature of Panther as I didn't
keep 10.2.7 for long
I don't think you can configure the level one file extensions. What they
have eliminated though I don't consider a bad thing. Anytime you need to
send someone something though whether it be on a network or email a
compressed zip or rar file is always a better choice. A lot less chance of
a file
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree with Dan.
No luck involved at all. You had equipment with you. You were observant
enough to see the bird. You had the skill to take the photo.
Where's the luck?
Being there at the right time for the bird, of course. None of the
101 - 192 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
