A review from Digital Camera Magazine, says 1000 shots with lithiums.
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 23. august 2004 02:42
Til: Pentax Discuss
Emne: Batteries for the istD
It's CR-V3
A review from Digital Camera Magazine, says 1000 shots with lithiums.
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 23. august 2004 02:42
Til: Pentax Discuss
Emne: Batteries
The best way is with a tool designed for the task, I believe Micro-Tools has
them.
However
The way I do it most of the time is to:
1.) Lay the lens on a block of soft wood with the dent straight down and the
filter ring well supported.
2.) Use a short piece of 1/4 dowel rod as a punch and
I don't know about the best way to remove the dent but you might like to take a
look at this link - Filter Ring Dent Removing Tool
http://www.kyphoto.com/classics/filterringtool.html
I haven't tried it I'm considering it for a couple of my dented lenses (unless,
that is, someone comes up with a
That's exactly the way I do it but I don't cut the crescent out.
The wood gives enough without it and supports the ring better.
I like the idea of beveling the dowel rod though.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Brian Walters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 1:19 AM
PROCEED WITH CAUTION!
I have fixed a filter ring and in the process ruined the smoothness
of the focus mechanism. Lenses don't like being banged to one side like
that.
I ruined a pretty nice super takumar recently like that because of
excess banging and I was using a tool specifically for the
That's why I don't care for the crescent cutout idea, for the first few taps
the lens *will not* be well supported.
Leaving the softwood flat will absorb the blows and give as required.
Don
-Original Message-
From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 23,
How about get the part from Pentax and replace it yourself? Most filter
rings are easy to replace.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
What is the best way to fix a light dent on a filter ring end of a lens?
I cannot put a filter on it to try to straighten it out, its bent
slightly more than
frank theriault wrote:
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another slightly OT question:
Does anyone here have any experience with C41
process BW film?
Yes.
HTH,
frank
Okay, I guess I wasn't the first one to try to be
funny.
Hi all,
A couple of days late this week as I went northwards for the weekend.
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/cgi-bin/paw.cgi?date=23-Aug-2004
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
On 23/8/04, Peter Loveday, discombobulated, offered:
Firewire will be much faster than USB1.1, and would likely be the cheapest
fast option.
Check to see if the Firewire port has 4 contacts in it or 6. If 4, you
will need a reader that is powered separately. If 6, then the reader can
be powered
Are your batteries close to depleted? My *ist D focuses intermittently
when the batteries are almost dead.
Paul
On Aug 22, 2004, at 11:17 PM, Brendan wrote:
I seem to be having problems with the *istD's AF
system, is it me or does it seem not to AF that well
as far as accuracy? I'm used to the
Quoting Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 21/8/04, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, offered:
I haven't opened the SUB 2.0 Card
reader package yet - what is
the advantage, if any, of using that instead of
just pluggin into a port
directly?
Annsan, if you use your camera a lot, you will find that
I get slightly more than that. By the way, I've found some AA lithium
batteries from Energizer that reportedly last just as long as CRV3s,
yet cost only about half as much. I think I paid $18 for eight of the
AAs. I usually spend $38 for four CRV3s. I'm still on my first set, but
I can't see
the CF connector is more rugged because the card holder prevents sideways
stress on the pins. the times i have seen bent pins have been with a
defective card slot.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 6:15 AM
But for the second crop you have downsized for the web, haven't you?
If that's the case you wouldn't expect to see much difference as the
interpolated data has since been averaged out. To be fair you need to compare
the crop before downsizing to the 72dpi crop.
Dan
Quoting Jens Bladt [EMAIL
For Bayer sensors, 6MP is 1.5M red, 1.5M blue and 3M green photosites. The
interpolation will generally use more than 4 photosites to get one full colour
pixel (see comparison of techniques at http://www-ise.stanford.edu/~tingchen/).
If you consider the sensor to only be 1.5MP then you are
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Isnt it a fact that all digital sensors are rated in Mpixels
but that is counting each of the mono red, green and blue
pixels and when they convert to full color the image is interpolated
upward to achive the same Mpixel figure. i.e. since it takes
4 mono pixels to create
Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004, Sid Barras wrote:
I'm without a flash for my MZ S. (Or the PZ 1 and the MZ 5n either) -- that
is, unless the 280T works with the AF models. But I don't think so.
It does:
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/technology/hot-shoe/index.html
Hi guys!
Just letting you all know that I haven't had any nibbles for any of this
gear, so I will be listing it all on eBay in an hour or so. Bruce, if you
were still considering the Oly, can you drop me an email?
Thanks everyone!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Tanya Mayer
So did you take any pictures of these beautiful French women for us
to dream about too?
No I was too hot and tired..
vic
I have used these films on a few occassions. The key to success is using an
experienced printer. Most printers don't know how to handle this stuff. One of
the pro level stores I go to will print the CN400 in several different ways:
Sepia, Cyanotype, warm black, cool black or pure black and
Ah, summer in Canada. :)
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
-
Every one of us is, even from his mother's womb, a master craftsman of idols.
-- John Calvin (1509-64)
___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most
The tool I mentioned:
http://www.micro-tools.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PRODStore_Code=MTProduct_Code=LV1
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
PROCEED WITH CAUTION!
I have fixed a filter ring and in the process ruined the smoothness
of the focus mechanism. Lenses don't like being banged to one side like
-Original Message-
From: Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Plugging and unplugging the CF card from the camera must wear
the CF connectors.
Are CF connectors more resilient than the mini USB ports?
I've heard a few
(rare) cases of people bending the pins on the connectors
when
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vivitar 283/285.
I concur.
=
Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst
Of course it's all luck
-- Henri Cartier-Bresson
__
Post your free ad now!
Before my local good mini lab went out of business in June, he would develop and
print
for me a set
of proofs on colour paper just for viewing purposes(and aslo he did not have to change
papers etc for
one roll of film just for proofing). I got an idea which one(s)were good enough to
print
and
--- Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Here is a pic of the new family member:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/mx-web.jpg
Ain't she a beaut?
snip
For my money, the black MX is the most beautiful slr
Pentax (or anyone else, for that matter) ever made.
As most of you know, I have a silver one
--- David Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank!
A story for another time... I shall be waiting for
it! very big grin
What, out of curiosity, is your longest telephoto?
I have a 70-200 zoom by some manufacturer I am not
sure of (the lens is
totally unlabeled, and I bought it many
--- Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
You mean on the negative? Or might the print look
purplish just because
of using colour paper for a BW print. Or are you
supposed to do just
that with these films?
snip
Hi, Toralf,
I didn't mean to scare you. The purplish cast was on
the
Intersting photograph. It's like a rime/poetry. The shadow, the tree and the
cloud, Very nice.
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: David Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 23. august 2004 10:53
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the warm welcome, all ;-).
Kostas wrote:
OK, forgive me if stating the obvious here.
By all means. I've always wondered why the Litany of All Saints doesn't
contain a Patron Saint of the Obvious (Saint Dûh!, for instance). We need
one. At least I do, more often than I actually care to
Thank you Frank. I have had a black ME for a while, and I love the
solid feel plus plain old beauty of it. The biggest problem with it of
course is the fact that you have very little control over the exposures.
Its basically aperture priority automatic with some exposure
compensation. But
Thanks everyone, for their responses. I'll probably try a hybrid
approach, take the filter ring out and try to straighten out using the
dowel technique + the crescent cut out. If it doesn't work, then I'll
already have the ring out for replacement.
rg
Alan Chan wrote:
How about get the part
--- Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, here's try three.
Sorry if this posts more than once.
snip
Well, this is my second try at responding to yours, to
say that I'm having the same problem today...
vbg
-frank
=
Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst
Of course
---
Ann Sanfedele innocently wrote:
gotta run -
going to Toronto on Wed
Frank will know how to find me (I hope!:) )
Peter J. Alling cruelly responded:
You have to ask yourself, Is this something I really
want???
Ya know, Peter, I'm sitting right here, reading all
this stuff,
It does. Why wouldn't it. Through The Lens metering. A very fine flash.
I prefere Pentax and Metz flashes over any other brand. Because of built
quality and design. They will outlast anything, even the camera.
It is annoying that Pentax didn't make flashes quite as compatibe as lenses
or as
Hi,
Monday, August 23, 2004, 6:05:47 PM, Peter wrote:
I'd ask the rhetorical question Fondue Fork?, but I might get an answer.
something to do with cheesy photos, I'd guess.
--
Yodel-Adle-Eedle-Idle-Oo,
Bobli
I've heard a few
(rare) cases of people bending the pins on the connectors
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: Thoughts on Sunpak flashes?
The only problem with the AF280T is that it can't shoot in
opposite
direction of the lens (which I use when shooting downwards,
pointing the
camera at the cieling above and behind the camera). I have to
Don Sanderson wrote:
T
BTW: Congrats on the nice jealousy BLACK /jealousy MX!
Good price if you can sell the 50/2.8.
Don
Thanks, that's what I'm counting on. Somebody has to want one of those
macro lenses bad enough right? I did at one point.
rg
-Original Message-
From: Gonz
I also agree it's a *great* shot.
I never got the original post :-( so, whoever you are, VERY nice!
Don
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 12:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - Be Happy
--- [EMAIL
Interesting questions. Several (all related questions) not on the list,
that I most often try to ask myself when shooting are:
Why do I want to photograph this?
What excites me about what I am seeing?
How can I compose or render what I'm seeing so that a viewer not present
will feel and see
Very nice work -from you - and from the scanner.
All the best
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Pat Curran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 22. august 2004 23:21
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Scans from Minolta 5400
Hi
Excellent questions Tom.
I've printed this out to carry with me on my expeditions.
Thanks
Don
-Original Message-
From: Tom C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 2:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Taking the Time... was Questions to help improve your
Try Two:
I also agree it's a *great* shot.
I never got the original post :-( so, whoever you are, VERY nice!
Don
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 12:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - Be Happy
---
6. Mostly less than 15 seconds (for portraits or group shots. For
landscapes, architecture, nature, city-scapes etc. often several minutes).
7. I shoot pictures because I love to. I don't really want the photographs.
I just like photographing (I would happily leave the film with a lab and
just go
You picked a good week Ann. Actually supposed to see sun and be warm till the weekend.
I'm
not that
far out of Toronto.:-)
Dave
gotta run -
going to Toronto on Wed
Frank will know how to find me (I hope!:) )
If ya post something to pdml
tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Plugging and unplugging the CF card from the camera must wear
the CF connectors.
Are CF connectors more resilient than the mini USB ports?
I've heard a few (rare) cases of people bending the
Great shot Paul. Lots of colour.The phoot screams 'happy times' to me anyway.
I like how you have the fronts of the moving cars positioned.
I shot this photo while my family and I were cruising on
Wednesday night in our 55 BelAir Convertible.
But Frank, it did get through. Have you set up a filter on yourself?
frank theriault wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pretty light, nice composition, great color. I like
it.
Paul
I heartily agree. Except, as I tried to post earlier
(but it didn't come through) I'd hate to wake up
I find my Acer 2720s adequate for my needs. 2700 DPI fairly low noise
levels. When I bought it I paid less than $300.00 US
I expect that you could get the same scanner from Banq, (the people who
bought Acer's scanner business), for a bit less with Digital
Ice built in. (I sometimes wish I
Well, as a historic note, I can say 100's of rolls of XP-1 hand developed in
XP-1 chemicals worked just fine for me back in the 1980's. The contrast problem
is simply a matter of changing Multi Grade filters, or using a higher paper grade.
--
William Robb wrote:
C-41 BW, more correctly known as
On 23/8/04, Alexander Grigolia, Jr, discombobulated, unleashed:
NO, you most certainly DO NOT need to learn how to develop your own BW
film.
Sad but true.
It is, however, RECOMMENDED to greater ENHANCE the photographic
EXPERIENCE and GUESS what YOU'LL bloody WELL enjoy IT.
While many people
[ I had commented some other stuff here, then I killed the mailer by
mistake... I don't think I'll bother to write it down again, as I didn't
really say anything of consequence (as usual.) ]
Heheh. You should see the other 99% of my photos. Those would clarify
my comments to an extent that
To be a good BW photographer you need to know how to develop and print BW. It
helps for color too, but many feel it is not as important. Anytime you are
dealing with a custom lab you need to know enough to supervise their work for
you, at least enough to know when to demand a reprint.
--
Paul
Steve Jolly wrote:
Toralf Lund wrote:
Another slightly OT question:
Whoa, questions about photography are OT now? ;-)
It may well be an urban legend, but some people say that there are
straaange equipment out there that uses this medium known as film, yet
is in no way related to Pentax...
Does
I II or III?
I certainly did.
Cotty wrote:
On 23/8/04, Alexander Grigolia, Jr, discombobulated, unleashed:
NO, you most certainly DO NOT need to learn how to develop your own BW
film.
Sad but true.
It is, however, RECOMMENDED to greater ENHANCE the photographic
EXPERIENCE and GUESS what
--- graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be a good BW photographer you need to know how
to develop and print BW. It
helps for color too, but many feel it is not as
important. Anytime you are
dealing with a custom lab you need to know enough to
supervise their work for
you, at least
On 23/8/04, Paul McEvoy, discombobulated, unleashed:
snip
Is there a reason that I've read in any number of
places that in order to be
a good photographer you need to learn how to
develop b+w film?
snip
--- Cotty, in his inimitable style, answered:
snip
When I did shoot film, I would
--- graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be a good BW photographer you need to know how
to develop and print BW. It
helps for color too, but many feel it is not as
important. Anytime you are
dealing with a custom lab you need to know enough to
supervise their work for
you, at least
On 23/8/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
I II or III?
I certainly did.
Oh God. Alright, Walt Disney ever draw a cartoon?
(why do I get the feeling that I am digging a rather large hole here..)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Pentax Super A, 200mm A Lens. Would that be the 200mm Macro or
the 200mm f4 telephoto?
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 21:38:40 +0200
Subject: RE: Scans from Minolta 5400
Very nice work
On 23/8/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Photography is pointing a camera and pushing the
shutter release (or otherwise exposing the film).
Everything after that is processing. The two need not
meet.
H.
(Trying to ponder after a nice dinner of home-made
http://www.engadget.com/entry/3622842317441586/
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
The original Micky Mouse, (Steamboat Willie), the animation became much
better after he hired
professionals...
Cotty wrote:
On 23/8/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
I II or III?
I certainly did.
Oh God. Alright, Walt Disney ever draw a cartoon?
(why do I get the feeling
But that's half the fun :-P
frank theriault wrote:
---
Ann Sanfedele innocently wrote:
gotta run -
going to Toronto on Wed
Frank will know how to find me (I hope!:) )
Peter J. Alling cruelly responded:
You have to ask yourself, Is this something I really
want???
Ya
. All is revealed in the
documentary, which I recommend to anyone who can get BBC4.
Details here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/listings/programme.shtml?day=filename=20040823/20040823_2100_4544_17754_60
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/listings/index.shtml?service_id=4544
--
Cheers,
Bob
Quote:
Posted Aug 23, 2004, 2:09 PM ET by mm
The Nikon products are just rumors...the Canon 20D can be purchased
within 3 weeks...big difference!
Sounds familiar ?
Cotty wrote:
http://www.engadget.com/entry/3622842317441586/
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
It's not that you need to develop anything, really. But:
It's a bit like the Alchemists. They didn't really want to make gold!! It
was the process that was important - the knowlegde they achieved by trying.
(The alchemist believed that cosmic radiation was going to change their
souls/brains. The
Hi,
Monday, August 23, 2004, 8:44:57 PM, Don wrote:
Excellent questions Tom.
I've printed this out to carry with me on my expeditions.
I guess it depends on the nature of your expeditions, but in general I
find it better to shoot first and ask questions later.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Wow...
You guys and gals don't sit idle at your keyboards, do you.
Got home after just an oval weekend to find 900 messages in the inbox.
Seems that I missed a lot of common bickering and a well-deserved kick
in the butt from Frank, I'm glad I had a good alibi. I have spent a
nice couple of days
--- Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow...
You guys and gals don't sit idle at your keyboards,
do you.
Got home after just an oval weekend to find 900
messages in the inbox.
Seems that I missed a lot of common bickering and a
well-deserved kick
in the butt from Frank, I'm glad I had a
On 23/8/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
I don't remember doing it, but after
tanking up on Mr. Owens' homemade brew, it may be that
lots of things happened that I don't remember...
A, The Red Curse..
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
Just for grins I bid 1/2 of the lowest KEH Bargain price for this, and
won!
http://tinyurl.com/6477x
Now I'm wondering if this is one of those If it sounds too good to be true,
it probably is things.
Anyone have experience with this lens, I know it's very heavy but is it
good?
Don
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A, The Red Curse..
I think it was stronger than your Hobgoblin!
-frank
=
Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst
Of course it's all luck
-- Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 23/8/04, Don Sanderson, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://tinyurl.com/6477x
Now I'm wondering if this is one of those If it sounds too good to be true,
it probably is things.
Anyone have experience with this lens, I know it's very heavy but is it
good?
It's the first lens Pentax ever made
Hi Guys
I'm having to unsub for awhile. I have to move on short notice. I'm moving
back to Massachusetts where I'm originally from and will be staying with
some friends. I should be on for the rest of the evening then taking the
computer apart tomorrow morning. I don't know when I'll get internet
On 23/8/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
A, The Red Curse..
I think it was stronger than your Hobgoblin!
I think there is one word that springs to mind when I think of Bill's
Homebrew:
Respect.
Norm knows what I mean.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
--- tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More rumors -
http://tinyurl.com/42w2g
Crap!
That sounds like more than a rumour.
No more HP5+? My fave film! I like it better than
TriX, but I guess I'll soon be going back to TX full
time...
sob
no cheers just tears,
frank
=
Your first 10,000
On 23/8/04, Butch Black, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm having to unsub for awhile. I have to move on short notice. I'm moving
back to Massachusetts where I'm originally from and will be staying with
some friends. I should be on for the rest of the evening then taking the
computer apart tomorrow
I saw this thread in the archives and felt that I just had to jump in.
The question, as I understand it, is not whether a photographer has to or
should process their own film and make their own prints, but whether one
should LEARN the processes involved. Once one understands how the film and
the
Butch Black wrote:
Hi Guys
I'm having to unsub for awhile. I have to move on short notice. I'm moving
back to Massachusetts where I'm originally from and will be staying with
some friends. I should be on for the rest of the evening then taking the
computer apart tomorrow morning. I don't know when
Oval? Never seen that before.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 5:10 PM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Accidental SMC Pentax - A 28-135/4
On 23/8/04, Don Sanderson, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://tinyurl.com/6477x
It has a good reputation, supposedly soft at the tele end. It the lens
is in relatively good shape it's probably a real bargain.
Don Sanderson wrote:
Just for grins I bid 1/2 of the lowest KEH Bargain price for this, and
won!
http://tinyurl.com/6477x
Now I'm wondering if this is one of those If
The question, as I understand it, is not whether a photographer has to or
should process their own film and make their own prints, but whether one
should LEARN the processes involved. Once one understands how the film and
the developer and the exposure, and the different aspects of printing
Wait a second o' leg pulling one.
The front element rotates, gotta be plain ole' round!
Don (The gullible?)
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 5:10 PM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Accidental SMC Pentax - A 28-135/4
On
Dear list knowlegde bank...
Somtime ago someone here posted photographs etc. about hoe to re-assemble
A-lenses. Could someone please direct me to this website or pdf-file or what
ever it was?
I found that my A 2.8/28mm didn't focus at infinity - at all. The front
element was loose. I have taken
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Toralf Lund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 23. august 2004 22:46
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: C41 BW film
Steve Jolly wrote:
Toralf Lund wrote:
Another slightly OT question:
Take care Cotty (and enjoy some off-line time) - it's a BIG time consumer,
even though very interesting at times.
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 24. august 2004 00:18
Til: pentax
You're not using enough film.
Regards,
Bob...
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interesting questions. Several (all related questions) not on the list,
that I most often try to ask myself when shooting are:
Why do I want to photograph this?
What excites me about what I am seeing?
How can I
Jens Bladt wrote:
Take care Cotty (and enjoy some off-line time) - it's a BIG time consumer,
even though very interesting at times.
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Hey, it's not Cotty who's leaving, it's Butch!
/Henri
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the comments. The cruise was great. The final count was
40,000 cruisers and 1.6 million spectators, and that was a police
count. I shot a lot of stuff with the A400/5.6 on a tripod. I like the
compression I get with the long lens. I've posted two of them.
For landscape, nature, and the like, if it's a several hour drive, or a 'I'm
only going to be here once this year and don't know when I'll be back
again', asking the questions after shooting is too late. It doesn't help
'get the shot'.
Tom C.
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL
Hi Henri, sorry to see you leave ;-)
Just joking. Butch, I hope you will enjoy the time, a vacation from a computer is
always good :)
Good light!
fra
On 23 Aug 2004 at 17:30, Paul McEvoy wrote:
from the questioner:
What kind of scanners are people using? Are most of you developing your
black and white film yourselves and scanning it in? Is a cheaper scanner
adequate?
I develop and scan my BW films, scanning BW films well is quite
On 23 Aug 2004 at 17:46, tom wrote:
More rumors -
http://tinyurl.com/42w2g
Bummer, I didn't realize that the ink side of the business was essentially
separate and located in a different country, good luck to them but it isn't
looking good. :-(
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
On 24/8/04, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
Take care Cotty (and enjoy some off-line time) - it's a BIG time consumer,
even though very interesting at times.
Jens
???
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
More rumors -
http://tinyurl.com/42w2g
OK - I read the story.
I was also struck by the ad on the right-hand border.
It took me some time to realise it was trying to persuade
me to purchase the clothing being shown.
Or perhaps it's just my mind.If so, I'll keep it.
~
~
On 23/8/04, Caveman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
However, the average amateur photographer does not get so deep into the
details. S/he points, s/he shoots, and then passes the film off to the lab.
I beg to differ. He passes no film to anyone. He just plugs an USB cable
I know it's very heavy but is it good?
I dug out a review of this lens (along with the Super A, Motor Drive
A, and AF200T) from Amateur Photographer for August 6, 1983:
28-35mm must be the most versatile 'standard lens' around. Other
examples of this focal length are on the way but Pentax were
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
