In a message dated 1/12/2005 12:17:11 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
writes:
So, it's a first time from me for this group.
http://www.eol.ee/~margus/arvutikasutaja/lady_night.jpg
That frame was taken at our company New Year costume party with
available dim light plus
Sigma ST-500 f
It *is* broke, check
http://www.mail-archive.com/pentax-discuss@pdml.net/msg205063.html
It's a goner; do other manufacturers support it even in the way
Pentax does?
More cost cutting, it's about time Pentax stopped following Canon and
Minolta
trends, they never where scared of breaking from the no
As the subject says: I really like those thin leather straps that came
with Spotmatics. I have a couple, one on the istD and one on the M6,
but could use one or two more.
Anyone have one or two of those they want to part with?
Thanks,
j
--
Juan Buhler
http://www.jbuhler.com
blog at http://www.
OK. There's different kind of journalists, or journalism.
The ones that feel htat they want to tell stories, want to show "how the
world is". They should have tho goal to be as near at reality as
possible.
The you have political journalism (in a wider sense). Those journalists
want to change someth
I'm checking out the ist Ds and comparing it to my ist D. Just in case
anyone is considering both cameras, here are my impressions:
At first glance, the deeper handle seems odd, kind of holding a Canon.
Although I think it could grow on me, I'm just too used to the ist D.
The display is gorgeous
Question from switzerland: what's a pom?
Michael
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Doug Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Januar 2005 01:47
An: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Betreff: Re: New Member
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 01:07:55 +0800, David S wrote:
> Could be worse, it
I know about the problem with the baz-newsline on my website. But i
didn't find a solution yet (i haven't been looking too hard). The source
code was made by a baz guy.
About the sharpening. I'm no fan of sharpening images too hard. You
didn't do that with film, so why should I now. The image shou
You're quite pessimistic...
How many pictures do you store on your pc? There's a lot more other
stuff going on your computer than just mp3.
Michael
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Januar 2005 00:50
An: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
I have a Vosonic P300 X's-Drive (the old one without the picture screen).
It's 40GB (10-15.000 pictures) but is rather slow - it takes like 10-15
minutes to download 512 MB's worth of RAW shots. So I usually carry 2
RAM-cards. It plays music (MP3) as well, but the batteries won't last long
if it d
Thanks for the link!
I guess it's cheeper to just go and buy annother Hassie :-)
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Rick Womer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 25. januar 2005 21:55
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: PESO: Th
In a message dated 1/25/2005 11:11:16 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks, Marine aka Doe.
I put this on the *ist D: F 1.7 AF Adapter (AF not working??), Vivitar 2x
teleconverter (K-type), M*4/300mm. In total 1020mm.
On a tripod*
I set the camera to 200 ASA and dialed in -1
On 26 Jan 2005 at 8:01, Peter Smekal wrote:
> Has anyone used the K or A 15/3.5 as an ultra-wide lens on the *ist D or
> DS? Maybe it's a too 'nose-heavy lens-camera combination' (?)
I really don't care how heavy it is but it's got the right mount and it
performs very well, probably better than
Thanks Peter.
It's a Manfrottto 190B and a Bogen 3030 head. For this kind of work I really
need seperate support for the lens - or at tripod mount on the lens instead
of the camera.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Peter J. All
Thanks, Marine aka Doe.
I put this on the *ist D: F 1.7 AF Adapter (AF not working??), Vivitar 2x
teleconverter (K-type), M*4/300mm. In total 1020mm.
On a tripod*
I set the camera to 200 ASA and dialed in -1.7 exp. comp. Focused manualy
and pressed the shutter, using 10 sec. self timer**. I took
You are right. But focal length was: 1,7 x 2 x 300mm = 1020mm. And the moon
didn't even fill the frame!
With the crop factor is equals app. 1530mm on a 35mm.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jack Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 1/25/2005 10:26:08 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bill Owens"
> Subject: GFM?
>
> > How many of you folks are planning on attending this year?
===
Probably not. Probably be too hard for me to get away this year.
M
Has anyone used the K or A 15/3.5 as an ultra-wide lens on the *ist D or
DS? Maybe it's a too 'nose-heavy lens-camera combination' (?)
Peter
On 25 Jan 2005 at 20:49, Mishka wrote:
> To me, it looks like filmscanner has an edge wrt. tonality and
> lattitude. Sharpness-wise,
> they look pretty close.
>
> BTW, I have been trying to get Nikon 9000 for almost six months now.
> It seems to be
> permanently on back-order (at Amazon, BH and A
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bill Owens"
> Subject: GFM?
>
> > How many of you folks are planning on attending this year?
> >
>
> Thinking about it.
>
> William Robb
what he said :)
save a bunk for me at Central
ann
Thanks Trevor
Dave
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:48:05 +1100, Trevor Bailey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> G'day David.
> Welcome to the list.
> Be prepared to get about 300 emails per day form the list.
> Hooroo.
> Regards, Trevor Bailey
> Grafton, N.S.W.
> Australia
I'm just making myself feel better, because I *lost* my K85/1.8...
sigh...
j
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:09:41 -0500, Paul Stenquist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use both the K50/1.4 and the 85/1.8. I use the 85 when I want more
> foreshortening of the features.
> Paul
> On Jan 25, 2005, at 8:26 P
I'm half tempted to show up, if only for a day or so
to meet some of you PDML'ers.
--- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bill Owens"
> Subject: GFM?
>
>
> > How many of you folks are planning on attending
> this year?
> >
>
> Thinking about
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: Digital portrait lens
William Robb wrote:
A50/1.2 is an interesting portrait lens, though I find it a wee bit
short.
Freudian slip?
That's the second time you've gone down this path.
You have some weird fixations Mr. C
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Owens"
Subject: GFM?
How many of you folks are planning on attending this year?
Thinking about it.
William Robb
frank theriault wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:31:29 -0500, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Of course comments are welcome...
> >
> > There are eight thumbnails here at this click - so
> > it will load fast.
> > They are all people I know or knew from slightly
> > to very well.
> >
>
How many of you folks are planning on attending this year?
Bill
Hi!
Welcome...
One more soul is lost in vast and mysterious PDML...
Boris
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I seem to remember that Cotty went to the dark side because Pentax did not
seem interested in producing a DSLR at the time. That was not jumping ship, that
was giving up hope. As such it is understandable.
OTOH, those who chose Canon instead of Pentax should be excommunicated (GRIN).
grayw
So, is demand for used lenses and teleconverters like this one being driven
up by new *ist-Ds purchasers? Inquiring minds want to know
--Mark
Peter J. Alling wrote:
>
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=4688&item=3867897334
&rd=1
>
A microcomputer chip has to be zero defects (excluding memory areas where they
can put in more than they need and map out defective areas) and they are made to
much higher densities. Almost all imaging sensors have a few defective pixels. A
full-size sensor should only cost in the vicinity of 2.
In a message dated 1/25/2005 7:59:03 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just wanted to know what the difference (in your mind) is between a
universal objective truth, and external reality (terms that you used),
as I really didn't know what you were talking about without some ide
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:09:49 -0500, Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> damn lawyer!
> :)
>
> but, even given all the fine print, i still find the presumption
> overly optimistic.
>
> as a side note, maybe some people here have noticed that in my country
> there were elections (which have finally
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:36:34 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a message dated 1/25/2005 4:36:41 PM Pacific Standard Time, k
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I will add to this resend, that you are equating universal object truth with
> > external reality. A common mistake.
>
> I
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:31:29 -0500, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course comments are welcome...
>
> There are eight thumbnails here at this click - so
> it will load fast.
> They are all people I know or knew from slightly
> to very well.
>
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder.t
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:05:47 -0500, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please check out
>
> http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
>
> Taken with PZ1P, 600mm f4.0 FA
>
> Comments: Yea, Nay or otherwise.
>
> Thanks in advance for looking & commenting.
>
I'll prefa
In a message dated 1/25/2005 4:36:41 PM Pacific Standard Time, k
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I will add to this resend, that you are equating universal object truth with
> external reality. A common mistake.
I'm intrigued. Since you brought it up, what's the difference? This
isn't a trap, I really
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:06:45 -0500, Peter J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> O, Cotty's gonna get you for that...
Nah...
If Cotty's gonna get me for anything, it'll be that hairpiece comment
I made on the weekend. Compared to that, this is small potatoes.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness i
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:58:55 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/TOPDML%20MEET%20DEC04/?
> action=view¤t=P0166.jpg
>
> This should explain a lot.
That is clearly a PS manipulation to make it ~look~ like I'm chimping.
In the altern
The New York Times is among the most liberal papers in the United
States. The paper hasn't endorsed a Republican for president in close
to a century. Its politics are almost always at odds with those of the
Journal. Whether one supports the opinions of the Times' editors or
not, it's a worthy r
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:32:06 +0100, Michael Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I never introduced myself.
>
> If you want to see a picture of me, go to:
> http://michaelheim.com/images/2002.jpg
>
> Pictures i made (ant other stuff about me) you can find at:
> www.michaelheim.com
>
> And i'm no Au
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:15:56 -0500, Peter J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and he was nominally a lawyer as well.
Biting tongue, biting tongue...
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:08:28 -0500, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Deceit and sensitivity. They always go together well, don't they?
>
> Worked for Bubba
>
That's no fair. We're not supposed to talk politics here, and I have
a great G Dubya joke in answer to that one! .
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 01:07:55 +0800, David S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could be worse, it could be taken over by poms ;-)
...And thanks to others Aussies on the list, I now know what a pom is!
Welcome aboard, Dave. Don't listen to Tom. We need more from the
Commonwealth here to balance
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:52:37 -0500, Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> interesting: i have always considered NYT to be quite conservative (in
> good sense).
> best,
> mishka
It is.
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:15:19 -0500, David Chang-Sang
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It was nice to hear Frank say "Really, it's Cotty who chimps the most on the
> PDML. I've seen him do it at GFM!!" ;)
>
Dave,
You may have noticed another thread, in which we discuss reality,
objectivity, truth,
it is way cool!
mishka
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:55:48 +1000, Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Don't know where this type of image fits into the lie cheat subvert argument
> but it's obviously a representation from a point in space with little margin
> for creative cropping :-) So how di
Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am looking for American, reputable stores with web interfaces, carrying
> used equipment. I already know of B&H, Adorama, Henry's and KEH.
> Any others?
> Thanks,
> Kostas
In addition to those you mention, I highly recommend:
Can
damn lawyer!
:)
but, even given all the fine print, i still find the presumption
overly optimistic.
as a side note, maybe some people here have noticed that in my country
there were elections (which have finally ended in an inauguration) not that
long time ago. and i have to say that the coverag
I use both the K50/1.4 and the 85/1.8. I use the 85 when I want more
foreshortening of the features.
Paul
On Jan 25, 2005, at 8:26 PM, Juan Buhler wrote:
A K55/1.8 is the perfect istD replacement for the K85/1.8...
82.5mm, but hey.
j
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:24:03 -0500, Collin R Brendemuehl
<[EMAI
- Original Message -
From: "Frits Wuthrich" Subject: Re: OT: Kobe-SI-CNN and BMW
Thanks for sharing. I think your family is correct though. Only thing is,
on
this list, we share the same deviation, so we understand you, which is
really
scary.
--
Frits Wüthrich
Thanks for the reply Fri
Interesting. At f/8, the DA14mm's aperture is less than 2mm in
diameter where the FA16-45 is at 2mm or greater. Perhaps you're
seeing the onset of diffraction, reducing the resolution. How do
they compare at f/5.6?
I normally set aperture between f/4 and f/5.6 with the 14mm.
Godfrey
--- Herb
For me, a 50/1.4 makes a near-perfect portrait tele, although I
tend to shoot a lot of portraits with a 28mm (and soon the 31mm)
as well.
Godfrey
--- Collin R Brendemuehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given the coverage difference, what lens is used by you
> istD/DS-ers for portraits?
> 50mm?
why?
mishka
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:17:20 +0100, Michael Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's not strange. Without that goal media wouln't work any more.
>
> Michael
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Mishka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Januar 2005 01:57
> A
interesting: i have always considered NYT to be quite conservative (in
good sense).
best,
mishka
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:52:43 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I read the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times. The truth, as you say,
> is somewhere in
> between.
> Paul
"Chimping: When one takes a photo with a digital camera and immediately
looks to see the image. Ideally, he says "Ooohhh, check this one out" or
some such."
I've never seen a chimpanzee do that. Orangutans yes, but not chimps.
Joe
William Robb wrote:
A50/1.2 is an interesting portrait lens, though I find it a wee bit short.
Freudian slip?
Tom C.
To me, it looks like filmscanner has an edge wrt. tonality and
lattitude. Sharpness-wise,
they look pretty close.
BTW, I have been trying to get Nikon 9000 for almost six months now.
It seems to be
permanently on back-order (at Amazon, BH and Adorama). At this point I
have decided that
my lifespan
G'day David.
Welcome to the list.
Be prepared to get about 300 emails per day form the list.
Hooroo.
Regards, Trevor Bailey
Grafton, N.S.W.
Australia
-Original Message-
From: David S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 January 2005 12:26 AM
To: PDML
Subject: New Member
G'day t
"Some of you might remember that a few weeks ago I said that my gf was
thinking about getting a digital Rebel...
"Well, she just received her istDS with 18-55 from Adorama today."
It is always good when we can prevent a fellow human from going over to
the Dark Side. If only we could have gotten to
G'day Anne.
It's one of those situations when you read your own post after having
posted it, and chuck a Homer Simpson.DOH!!!
-Original Message-
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 January 2005 4:29 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Used cam
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
Subject: Re: PP: Digital Grain
I'm going to show color prints from film and color prints from
digital. I see thousands of prints a month. I can't control the
experiment if all the prints are not outputted from the same
source. The discussion
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Cassino"
Subject: Re: Question for the Brotherhood...
2; Mirror Lock-Up is a pretty important feature for this camera for
some
types of photography. If you are shooting flash in a studio, it
probably
does not matter. Longer exposures - 1/15th or longer
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Dogmatism: what is allowed?
"To me, a photograph presented as the truth is always a lie, since
it always represents the photographers personal representation of
something."
This is a representation of my dogs lying on the floo
Hello Collin,
I'm using a FA 50/1.4 - works pretty well.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Tuesday, January 25, 2005, 5:24:03 PM, you wrote:
CRB> Given the coverage difference, what lens is used by you istD/DS-ers for
CRB> portraits?
CRB> 50mm?
CRB> Collin
CRB> "You impress at a distance, but you impa
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
Subject: Re: PP: Digital Grain
People often ask how a particular photograph was made. The most
telling comment, from what seemed a fairly knowledgeable
individual, that came back was, "Hmm. From film, you say? That's
mighty good for a film i
- Original Message -
From: "Collin R Brendemuehl"
Subject: Digital portrait lens
Given the coverage difference, what lens is used by you istD/DS-ers
for portraits?
50mm?
A50/1.2 is an interesting portrait lens, though I find it a wee bit
short.
I was really hoping that something betwee
- Original Message -
From: "Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu"
Subject: Re: PP: Digital Grain
... I have absolutely no ideea what a really
good print looks like.
Don't feel badly. Most people don't.
William Robb
at f8, my DA 14 is uniformly sharp across the field, but noticeably less so
than the DA 16-45 at f8. the DA 16-45 and FA* 80-200/2.8 are about equal to
my eyes, and i expect that the FA* 28-70/2.8 to be about the same.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTEC
A K55/1.8 is the perfect istD replacement for the K85/1.8...
82.5mm, but hey.
j
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:24:03 -0500, Collin R Brendemuehl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given the coverage difference, what lens is used by you istD/DS-ers for
> portraits?
> 50mm?
>
> Collin
>
> "You impress at a d
Given the coverage difference, what lens is used by you istD/DS-ers for
portraits?
50mm?
Collin
"You impress at a distance, but you impact a life up close. The closer the
relationship the greater the impact."
Howard Hendricks
Sending again after 5 hours since it was never returned to me. Not that I
said anything really important...
Well put, Bob W. I personally believe there is an ultimate truth, an
ultimate reality.
Do I claim to know it? No. Will I or other humans ever fully understand
it? Likely not. But i
Jon M mused:
>
> http://www.charlottecamera.com
>
> I haven't actually bought from them, . . .
I have. Mail order used gear, sight unseen.
_Expensive_ used gear. No complaints.
Whilst on my way to drop off some B&W film from last weekend to a local lab
I ran into young Frank during his day-to-day activities.
We both didn't recognize each other at first due to the winter garb that
must be donned during these cold grey months; however we soon exchanged
"how-do-you-dos" and
Thanks Jon,
Dave
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:50:34 -0800 (PST), Jon M
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Welcome to the madness. :)
>
> -Jon M.
--- Herb Chong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my DA 14 is noticeably less sharp than my DA 16-45, and that
> is about the same as my FA* 80-200. i haven't shot enough yet
with my FA*
> 28-70, but given what i have seen from others, i expect it to
be equally
> good.
Less sharp ... in the center, at t
Thanks Lasse,
> They all look good.
> I particularly like all the B&W ones. (I preferred the 1st Crane btw.
> How did you set up the 500FTZ for the clock bit?
The flash was in TTL mode and bounced off the celing
> In thumbnail mode the "Gekko" looked something like a rotting p*nis. (Yeah, I
> k
Thanks John,
I'm in Fremantle West Australia.
Dave
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:22:55 +1000, John Coyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Welcome David, good to have another Aussie on board!
> Where are you located?
>
> John Coyle
> Brisbane
Perhaps a 'winky' following "easy peasy" would have better expressed my
deliberate understatement of the process's complexity.
regards,
Anthony Farr
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Har, far easier said than done I expect :-)
>
>
> Rob Studdert
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 01:07:55 +0800, David S wrote:
> Could be worse, it could be taken over by poms ;-)
Damned pommy bastards have been trying for years. :-)
As long as they bring the good beer and ale we don't put up a hard
enough fight to run them off. ;->
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:24:56 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't agree. No inconsistency to me. And if you boil it down -- I think what
> I originally said was that there was no universal objective truth. Only
> subjective truth.
But, some things are objectively true. G.W.
--- Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting I suspect our experience and expectations differ
> somewhat.
That begs the question:
What are your experiences and expectations? With regard to which
lenses I listed?
Godfrey
__
Do you
Thanks Christian,
For the link to the Pentax USA website version.
I downloaded it and updated my *ist-DS with no problems.
--
Fred Widall,
Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.ist.uwaterloo.ca/~fwwidall
---
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:54:27 -0600, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "frank theriault"
> Subject: Re: Dogmatism: what is allowed?
>
> >
> > Exactly what are we arguing about, anyway? This seems pretty
> > simple
> > and straightforward to me.
>
>
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:01:18 -0500, Graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "TRUTH"?
>
But we weren't arguing about truth. We were arguing about how much
manipulation of a photo is acceptable or allowed.
And, the answer is, "it depends". For photojournalism, very little
maniplation should be all
my DA 14 is noticeably less sharp than my DA 16-45, and that is about the
same as my FA* 80-200. i haven't shot enough yet with my FA* 28-70, but
given what i have seen from others, i expect it to be equally good.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to my eyes, there is a lot of noise in the "without NR" that would have to
be removed in Photoshop. lightning at that distance looks a lot like noise
to simplistic algorithms that mostly are focused on eliminating hot pixels.
i wonder if any other DSLR would far better. i think without smarter n
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:56:32 -0500, Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> frank, i agree with you 99%, wxcept this part, which i find a bit strange
> (strange that someone has this kind of expectations of the second oldest
> profession)
This is my part, to which Mishka refers:
> > On the other hand,
I am looking for a power pack for my PZ-1P any recommendations??
Thanks
Andy
> But you'll never know if Pentax are going to release a full-frame
> digital unless they do. You will never know that they won't as they
> are unlikely to state so.
Yes, their marketing dept. needs a good kick up the ass, it's all the more
enjoyable when they just release it and you think "did
> According to folks in the list, not by much, as the silicon wafers
> for this size have a great chance of yielding 0 (zero) usable sensor
> chips. I understood it to be a hard, physical limitation.
I know they're reaching their limitations, it's the same with computer CPU's
they need a breakt
From: "Michael Heim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 12:32 AM
Subject: AW: New Member
> I never introduced myself.
>
> If you want to see a picture of me, go to:
> http://michaelheim.com/images/2002.jpg
>
> Pictures i made (ant other stuff about me) you can find at:
>
Perhaps you misunderstand ... That original photo IS in color.
It was an unbelievably hazy day.
Rendering RGB to monochrome I do after I get the cropping the
way i want it. It's often the largest part of my image
processing work.
Godfrey
--- Juan Buhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 25
Welcome David, good to have another Aussie on board!
Where are you located?
John Coyle
Brisbane
- Original Message -
From: "David S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PDML"
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 11:25 PM
Subject: New Member
G'day to all PDML'ers,
"Allow myself to introduce...myself" ;-
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:44:35 -0800 (PST), Godfrey DiGiorgi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It was captured with the Panasonic FZ10 in full color ... The
> original is what you see when you click on the image, pre all
> significant processing work other than rotation and a small
> amount of cropping t
But you'll never know if Pentax are going to release a full-frame digital
unless they do. You will never know that they won't as they are unlikely to
state so.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: "John Whittingham"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 24/01/05 23:39:41
To: "pentax-discuss@pdm
On 25 Jan 2005 at 14:38, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> I have no experience with Pentax zooms, but so far the primes
> I've bought (DA14, A28/2.8, A50/1.4, M85/2, K Tak 135/2.5,
> FA135/2.8, A200/4) have all proven to be very nice performers,
> comparable in performance with the Canon primes I use. So
On 25 Jan 2005 at 23:39, Michael Heim wrote:
> I can recommend ARCOS GMINI with 20 GB Harddisk and Compact Flash Card
> Reader.
> Ist very small and handy. And it also plays music...
If I'm carrying around a hard disk with several months of images on it the very
last thing I want it to be doing
I have the Compact Drive PD6A 60gb unit and am quite happy with it's
speed and usage.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Tuesday, January 25, 2005, 3:02:49 PM, you wrote:
RS> On 25 Jan 2005 at 13:50, Juan Buhler wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Would you mind telling what device this is? I have an ipod, but the
Thanks, Juan.
It was captured with the Panasonic FZ10 in full color ... The
original is what you see when you click on the image, pre all
significant processing work other than rotation and a small
amount of cropping to get the verticals where I wanted them.
When I first saw it on the computer,
I can recommend ARCOS GMINI with 20 GB Harddisk and Compact Flash Card
Reader.
Ist very small and handy. And it also plays music...
Michael
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Juan Buhler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Januar 2005 22:51
An: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Betreff:
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
