I am using version 3.97. I think it came with "IrfanView Thumbnails", a
separate application. It's the thumbnails program that generates the
thumbnails along with the HTML. It's fairly configurable too. You can
do a lot of customization.
So it boils down to a two-step process. First, batc
LOL
Try going through any door with a spear through your head. That's a neat trick.
Dave S
On 6/4/05, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > most things are possible
>
> Try going through a revolving door with a
Hi Bruce
sorry, I have not seen that or my email crossed your answer...
I see and understand your arguments, especially dual flash usage is not a
"easy" thing :-)
greetings
Markus
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 5:12 AM
>>To
G'day Shel,
I'm using version 3.80 and it'll do all the things David Oswald mentioned.
To create a gallery these are the steps I've used in the past. The
first step assumes that the images have not already been re sized for
web use.
- Step 1
Start IrfanView :-)
Go to File > Batch Conversion /
Hi Herb
I used the digi cam only for the test, the "real thing" will be done on film
with the SFXn and the
A50mm macro or A24mm lens. I took between 10 and 14 pictures with the digi
cam for the panorama and
the software stitched it right on the first try and fully automatically :-)
greetings
Markus
Hi Jens
try renaming that file manually.
You better move the good ones first out of that directory.
Start --> run --> cmd
ren ???.* .*
that should solve the problem.
greetings
Markus
>>I have dumped RAW files in my portable hard drive. Can anyyone
>>direct me to
>>some soft ware that mig
Hello Wiggy
welcome here and greetings from Switzerland
Markus
>>best I can (sure are a lot of them)! Anyway, howdy from North Carolina.
>>
>>Best,
>>
>>Wiggy
>>http://www.growlery.com/wigwam
>>
>>
I thought that I had mentioned the issue there. I do, in fact, have
two bodies and sometimes it works to do just as you suggested. The
times it doesn't work are when I am using my flash system on a big
bracket with a Quantum battery clipped to my side - I couldn't carry
two such rigs. Or when I
Hi Paul
just when I started to wonder how all the good photos I see in books from
the years 1930 - 1970 where possibly made
your email came in :-)
lovely shot, thanks for showing it
Markus
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Friday, June 03,
Hi Bruce
do you ever take photos out in the cold weather or rain or other difficult
environment conditions too?
I saw in the specifications of some digital bodies that they only work from
0 - 40 grade Celsius
or is that very conservative?
How good is a Pentax digital body under unfriendly weather
Hi Bruce
what speaks against having a second body with you to compensate for the
shortcomings of the buffer?
Even an old one with film loaded or a P&S dig cam if you can not afford a
second DSLR or
what it lighter?
I'm pretty quick with my SFX and the P30 as a backup and second body with
the 24mm
Hi Pentax lovers
does anybody here know the Vixen VX2 body?
I wonder if the brighter viewfinder would be useful for other themes like
available light photography as well.
thanks
Markus
At my shop, when someone comes in with a camera that takes CF cards and is
having card errors, the first thing I check is the cardslot in the camera.
Are the pins all straight? Are any missing? Bent pins are pretty common in
just-purchased cameras, usually from user error (the user not being u
you may find that shooting with smaller digital camera easier. it all
depends on your target final image size. the only thing a P&S digital camera
may limit you on is the maximum FOV at the wide end. i like to shoot with a
24mm lens FOV for most of my panoramas. too much more than that and you e
the *istD produces RAW files about 13-14 megabytes in size and the D70
closer to 9. the *istD uses a very inefficient storage format and then
compounds the problem by storing two additional JPEG images inside the RAW
file in addition to the mandatory thumbnail. Canon cameras manage almost 1
meg
Hi Herb
I did a quick test shooting of a golf place here with a cheap digicam and
made a panorama with Panorama Factory.
Thanks to the software it was actually much easier than I thought.
greetings
Markus
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Wednesday,
Hi Kenneth
My tests with Panorama factory showed me that it is in fact quite easy to do
a panorama.
But thanks for your tip to avoid a polarizer, that's what I normally use
often in the mountains.
greetings
Markus
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent
Try removing the batteries from the D, then reinserting
them. Perhaps the firmware just needs to be reset. When my D
froze a couple of weeks ago, this did the trick.
If this doesn't work, and it cannot format other cards, then
the camera is defective. It is my impression that the D had
a high
PSCS, Leon
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: "Leon Mlakar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 8:16 PM
Subject: RE: PSD v TIF v PNG
Photoshop lets you save the 16-bit per channel image in PNG? Which
version?
I know 7.0 doesn't.
>
Leon
Beautifully rendered Bruce, but I'm not sure whether it actually conveys
anything to me.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 2:25 AM
Subject: PESO - Caged
Been awhile since I posted a PESO. I'd
>
>i always save the "straight scans", 16bit. these are
>"negatives", they are burned on dvds, and stored away. i very
>much want to avoid re-scanning in future.
If you scan a lot then it makes sense. Not many of my photographs are
interesting enough to be worth scanning, so I don't. Besides, w
>-Original Message-
>From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 1:36 AM
>To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
>Subject: Re: Buffer speed (Re: Why choose *ist DL over Nikon
>or Canon competitors?)
>
>in terms of megabytes/s, my 2-3 times stands. the difference
>is
That should read Zone VI modified Pentax Digital Spotmeter ;-))
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Shel Belinkoff
>
> I've owned the Spotmeter V and the Zone VI Digital Meter, both at the same
> time.
i always save the "straight scans", 16bit. these are "negatives",
they are burned on dvds, and stored away. i very much want to avoid
re-scanning in future.
best,
mishka
On 6/4/05, Leon Mlakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >But why destroy all that information in a file only to have to
> >sta
Hi Do,
I've owned the Spotmeter V and the Zone VI Digital Meter, both at the same
time. There are a lot of good points about both, and for someone who is
just getting started with, or refreshing themselves with the techniques of,
using a spot meter, I'd recommend the analog Spotmeter V.
While
Hello Jostein.
MindStor? If you mena my hard drive - it's a Vosonic X's drive with a 2,5"
hard drive.
Thanks
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 5. juni 2005 00:37
Til: pentax-discuss
No but you can read about them here.
http://www.lensbabies.com/
mike wilson wrote:
Anyone used one of these?
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=80397&item=7519123619&rd=1
mike
--
A man's only as old as the woman he feels.
--Groucho Marx
>
>But why destroy all that information in a file only to have to
>start over again later should you want another copy of the
>file? I just don't understand your reasoning. Of course,
>with PS 7.0 you have to do a lot of your work flow in 8-bit
>anyway, so maybe the difference isn't that grea
If you like beer You'll take the water.
Cotty wrote:
On 4/6/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Bob W wrote:
Buying someone a bud, especially a light one, constitutes a personal
attack,
and no court in the land would say otherwise.
Uncapitalis(z)ed i
Everyone's at GFM.
Don Sanderson wrote:
I've been reading up on the Zone System (again) and decided
a 1 degree spotmeter would help a lot in "training my eye" to
the different luminance levels.
Found a very good price on a Pentax Spotmeter V so I
grabbed it. ($169.00 recently calibrated)
Much
Hi Jens,
Am I right that you have a MindStor?
I think I've seen the "write-protected" error in the MindStor
Yahoo-group.
I'll see if I can dig out the reference.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 11:54 PM
Subjec
Still flaming! As you already know, you are absolutely right. The converter
is doing the job, and I'm happy, very happy. Thanks a lot, you made my day!
Tim
The Flaming Norwegian.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 4. juni 2005 22:40
To: pentax-dis
I have dumped RAW files in my portable hard drive. Can anyyone direct me to
some soft ware that might help, please?
I can't open the parent file hasw a funny name (not real letters) - my
computer tells me it's portected agains writing!
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.d
Anyone used one of these?
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=80397&item=7519123619&rd=1
mike
Cotty wrote:
On 4/6/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Bob W wrote:
Buying someone a bud, especially a light one, constitutes a personal
attack,
and no court in the land would say otherwise.
Uncapitalis(z)ed is the correct way to write it, too. Doesn't deserve a
big lette
On 4/6/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Bob W wrote:
>
>> Buying someone a bud, especially a light one, constitutes a personal
attack,
>> and no court in the land would say otherwise.
>
>Uncapitalis(z)ed is the correct way to write it, too. Doesn't deserve a
>big letter.
Well hang
Don Sanderson wrote:
I've been reading up on the Zone System (again) and decided
a 1 degree spotmeter would help a lot in "training my eye" to
the different luminance levels.
Found a very good price on a Pentax Spotmeter V so I
grabbed it. ($169.00 recently calibrated)
Much less money than the d
Bob W wrote:
Buying someone a bud, especially a light one, constitutes a personal attack,
and no court in the land would say otherwise.
Uncapitalis(z)ed is the correct way to write it, too. Doesn't deserve a
big letter.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Mishka [mailto
Cotty wrote:
On 4/6/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
I don't find it too much of a problem. If you have the whole rig on a
tripod, you effectively have one hand free. Right hand holding the
boddy and working the shutter release, left hand can work the aperture
ring. Or am I mi
I've been reading up on the Zone System (again) and decided
a 1 degree spotmeter would help a lot in "training my eye" to
the different luminance levels.
Found a very good price on a Pentax Spotmeter V so I
grabbed it. ($169.00 recently calibrated)
Much less money than the digi version and much tig
Hi Bruce, there's a lot to like about this one - the design and symmetry of
the fence, the sharpness of detail. But the background seems to fight the
foreground. I keep wanting greater contrast between foreground and
background to make the fence stand out even more. The light background
doesn't
Tim Øsleby wrote:
This converter doesn't seem to support the Ds.
Tim,
I am 100% sure it does support the DS. Give it a try :)
Adobe's website indeed does not mention the DS as supported camera,
but I have a dng file, converted from my very DS .pef, open right now
in Photoshop.
Keep it flamin'
It's sharp... and I like the symmetry.
Christian
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 12:25 PM
Subject: PESO - Caged
> Been awhile since I posted a PESO. I'd be interested in your thoughts
> on this one.
>
> Pentax *istD, A
No explicit language message.
This converter doesn't seem to support the Ds.
:-(
A real downer. Any other tips? Or do I just have to wait for an update
supporting my "new flame"? (my *ist Ds)
Tim
The Flaming Norwegian.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
I might agree if all I used were long lenses, but anything up to 300mm I
find to be easier to use the aperture ring.
Cotty wrote:
On 3 Jun 2005 at 20:08, Dario Bonazza wrote:
What about an aperture ring around the lens throat of the camera?
Just a thought.
Now this is an innovat
Hi,
Another book to look forward to: Don McCullin in Africa, due to be published
in August.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0224075144/qid=1117906198/sr=8-2/re
f=sr_8_xs_ap_i2_xgl/026-2685688-7169204
Cheers,
Bob
Buying someone a bud, especially a light one, constitutes a personal attack,
and no court in the land would say otherwise.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: Mishka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 June 2005 14:16
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Predictable Pe
>At 04.06.06 Cotty briefly stated:
>> ROTFL!
>>
>>Ahem
>>
>
>???
>
>Cotty. To this simple (but flaming) Norwegian this just looks like a bad
>opening in Scrabble. What are you saying?
>
>Tim
>The Flaming Norwegian.
The bit where you wrote
>She responds to every move I
>make. And when I touc
On 4/6/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I don't find it too much of a problem. If you have the whole rig on a
>tripod, you effectively have one hand free. Right hand holding the
>boddy and working the shutter release, left hand can work the aperture
>ring. Or am I missing someth
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 09:25:04 -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Been awhile since I posted a PESO. I'd be interested in your thoughts
> on this one.
>
> Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4
> ISO 200, 1/500 @ f/5.6, handheld
>
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2025.htm
Interesting geometry shot, but it doesn'
Tim Øsleby wrote:
[ dirty talk cut :) ]
I'm not able to load the RAW files in Elements 3.
You may convert your RAW files to .dng format; PSE should then open
dng.
If you do not have the DNG converter already, it should be found
somewhere around http://www.adobe.com/products/dng/main.html -
I have dumped RAW files in my portable hard drive. Can anyyone direct me to
some soft ware that might help, please?
I can't open the parent file hasw a funny name (not real letters) - my
computer tells me it's portected agains writing!
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.d
Bruce,
Fine, if your're into it.;))
SHARP image. Nice up-load.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Been awhile since I posted a PESO. I'd be
> interested in your thoughts
> on this one.
>
> Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4
> ISO 200, 1/500 @ f/5.6, handheld
>
> http://www.daytonphoto.c
Pentax is doing a perfectly good job without anyone's help, which is why
they are where they are in the first place.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: Rumors About Pentax's Future
Accordi
According to Herb, who appears determined to help bring Pentax down.
On Jun 4, 2005, at 11:58 AM, Tom C wrote:
The sky is falling, the sky is falling!
Guess, my gut feeling is shared by some in the industry...
Tom C.
From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
according to their annual repor
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 02:37:05PM +0200, Tim ?sleby wrote:
> But there is one downer. I'm not able to load the RAW files in Elements 3. I
> have been to the Adobe site. There I realize, Elements does not support Ds,
Download the 2.4 or 3.x ACR update. While the DS isn't on the list of
cameras su
But why destroy all that information in a file only to have to start over
again later should you want another copy of the file? I just don't
understand your reasoning. Of course, with PS 7.0 you have to do a lot of
your work flow in 8-bit anyway, so maybe the difference isn't that great an
issue.
I didn't know Irfan did ALL that. Which version are you running, and what
are the steps required to generate the HTML? I don't see that in the
version I have (3.97, which I think is the latest).
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: David Oswald
> IrfanView will batch-process files (including a
Been awhile since I posted a PESO. I'd be interested in your thoughts
on this one.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4
ISO 200, 1/500 @ f/5.6, handheld
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2025.htm
--
Bruce
The sky is falling, the sky is falling!
Guess, my gut feeling is shared by some in the industry...
Tom C.
From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
according to their annual reports, Canon made 15.8% profit margin on their
digital camera division, the highest in the industry, while Nikon ma
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
On 2005-06-04, at 09:34, Cotty wrote:
Since acquiring some non-Pentax gear well over 2 years ago, I can now see
the advantages of not having to lose my comfortable grip on a lens to
alter aperture, particular while attempting manual focus as well. For me,
it's much mor
IrfanView will batch-process files (including adding sharpening, gamma
correction, resizing, and so on) in one step, and in a second step, will
generate thumbnails and all the HTML needed for a photo album. All one
has to do is upload it all to the server, and you're done.
Assuming my images
You may have decided on jalbum already, but here's another that's small,
runs quickly and includes sharpening as it generates the album.
http://www.stegmann.dk/mikkel/porta/
-P
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
I am looking for a free piece of software running on Solaris or XP
that will mak
I've seen the rest of the thread, it looks like camera error to me.
P. J. Alling wrote:
Maybe, I've been using the 1.12 firmware with no problems. Do you
have a second card?
Thibouille wrote:
Doesn't work.
It reads and formats without problem under WinXP.
Then put it into the camera. Tells
Maybe, I've been using the 1.12 firmware with no problems. Do you have
a second card?
Thibouille wrote:
Doesn't work.
It reads and formats without problem under WinXP.
Then put it into the camera. Tells me it is not formated and refuse to
format it itself.
Weird.
I should note I immediatel
Try formating it through your card reader. If it still won't format the
card after that you haven't lost anything. Just make sure to use fat16,
for your first attempt.
Thibouille wrote:
What to do?
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX and KR-10x .
The place I rent is an older neighborhood of mostly one story modest
homes, even the
larger homes fit this pattern. Except for one very large new McMansion
currently under
construction. This isn't a picture of it just a glimpse of what it's on
top of.
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PES
Yeah sure, unfortunately
2005/6/4, Graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Are you sure you did not format as NTFS? Has to be Win16 or Win32, I think.
>
> graywolf
> http://www.graywolfphoto.com
> "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
> ---
>
>
> Thibouille wrote:
> > We
At 04.06.06 Cotty briefly stated:
> ROTFL!
>
>Ahem
>
???
Cotty. To this simple (but flaming) Norwegian this just looks like a bad
opening in Scrabble. What are you saying?
Tim
The Flaming Norwegian.
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 4. juni 2005 14:42
Are you sure you did not format as NTFS? Has to be Win16 or Win32, I think.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Thibouille wrote:
Well, both my 512MB Toshiba cards did work well enough. I did the
upgrade to 1.12.
Then afte
no it wouldn't.
from Pentax web page: http://tinyurl.com/9uuul
Magnification: 0.95X (with 50mm F1.4 lens at infinity, -1m-1)
The coverage is, otoh, is independent of the focal length.
best,
mishka
On 6/4/05, Alan Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't the viewfinder magnification be constant
not beer. bud light.
best,
mishka
On 6/4/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, you owe me a beer.
> On Jun 3, 2005, at 10:53 PM, Mishka wrote:
>
> > personal attacks? what are you talking about?
> > i LOVE you, man! and you CAN have my bud light.
> >
> > best,
> > mishka
Well, both my 512MB Toshiba cards did work well enough. I did the
upgrade to 1.12.
Then after a while 1 went "not formated" and then the second one.
I can format as I want with my card reader, no problem.
If I connect the D to the PC I can't access the card (of course it is
supposed not to be form
Well, both my 512MB Toshiba cards did work well enough. I did the
upgrade to 1.12.
Then after a while 1 went "not formated" and then the second one.
I can format as I want with my card reader, no problem.
If I connect the D to the PC I can't access the card (of course it is
supposed not to be form
>
>PNG won't save as a layered file, so if you intend to do
>further work on the file, or may just want to have an
>"original layered final" copy, you'll still need a TIFF or
>PSD. My workflow is such that I always save a PSD or TIFF
>with all the layers, alpha channels, and saved selection
>>> I don't really feel like springing for the FA 85mm (and it's backordered
>>> anyway). Can anyone suggest an alternative lens or focal length or
>>> whatever? I'd love to hear what works for different people.
>
>> A*85mm f/1.4 of course!
>
>An excellent choice - it's sharp and versatile - it's o
On 4/6/05, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
>First. Just bought myself a second hand Ds. The kit lens is in the bin
>(relax, not literally speaking). I've bought myself a Tamron 28-75/2,8.
>I'm convinced this is the perfect toy for me. I love her, and I believe she
>loves me back. If it ai
First. Just bought myself a second hand Ds. The kit lens is in the bin
(relax, not literally speaking). I've bought myself a Tamron 28-75/2,8.
I'm convinced this is the perfect toy for me. I love her, and I believe she
loves me back. If it ain't love, then what a heck, then it is perfect sex,
and
The upgrade shouldn't be a problem. Did you use the card to transfer
the files? Did everything work okay at that time? My first *istD
wouldn't recognize any cards out of the box. I had to return it.
Haven't had any problems since. Try another card to see if the camera
is at fault. If you only
Doesn't work.
It reads and formats without problem under WinXP.
Then put it into the camera. Tells me it is not formated and refuse to
format it itself.
Weird.
I should note I immediately did the upgrade to 1.12 firmware. Would it
be a source of problem ?
2005/6/4, Frantisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Which card?
Does it read on PC?
Try formatting it on the PC (as FAT16 if it's <=2GB card, as FAT32 if
it's 2GB+ card! Not NTFS or Mac or whatever).
If it works:
Then, use some software that scans the "surface" for read/write
errors.
Then, format it in the camera again.
Hope this helps...
Goo
John, Leon ...
It all depends on what you want to do with the final image.
TIFF and PSD are quite similar, although TIFF will work with programs other
than PS. If you're saving your files with layers and other attributes, or
in 16-bit, it's best to use a TIFF or PSD file. Large layered PSD file
"This card is not formated" Funny, it worked quite well yesterday...
When I try to format (with built-in menu) i get a "Memory Card error".
I'm clueless ...
2005/6/4, John Coyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What actually happens Thibouille? Any error messages?
> John Coyle
> Praxis Data Solutions (ww
"This card is not formated" Funny, it worked quite well yesterday...
When I try to format (with built-in menu) i get a "Memory Card error".
I'm clueless ...
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX and KR-10x ...
2005/6/4, John Coyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
Okay, you owe me a beer.
On Jun 3, 2005, at 10:53 PM, Mishka wrote:
personal attacks? what are you talking about?
i LOVE you, man! and you CAN have my bud light.
best,
mishka
On 6/3/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Personal attacks, eh Mishka? I know how to read, but you don't kn
What actually happens Thibouille? Any error messages?
John Coyle
Praxis Data Solutions (www.epraxisdata.com)
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: "Thibouille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 8:00 PM
Subject: Ist-D won't format my CF.
What to do?
Photoshop lets you save the 16-bit per channel image in PNG? Which version?
I know 7.0 doesn't.
Once you finished your processing (PSD preserves layers and other Photoshop
internal information) I don't see any disadvantages except that 16-bit PNG
is probably not as widely supported as TIFF. The a
Maybe I took it off while camera was on or something.
Now camera says card isn't formated and when I choose the format
option in the menu, it says Card Error.
Any Clue? I do not have (yet) a card reader in the PC, so dunno what to do...
--
Thibouille
--
*i
What to do?
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX and KR-10x ...
On 2005-06-04, at 09:34, Cotty wrote:
Since acquiring some non-Pentax gear well over 2 years ago, I can now
see
the advantages of not having to lose my comfortable grip on a lens to
alter aperture, particular while attempting manual focus as well. For
me,
it's much more ergonomic to alter ape
> high humpty
???
Fred
>> I don't really feel like springing for the FA 85mm (and it's backordered
>> anyway). Can anyone suggest an alternative lens or focal length or
>> whatever? I'd love to hear what works for different people.
> A*85mm f/1.4 of course!
An excellent choice - it's sharp and versatile - it's only rea
> "Sitting in the sock drawer..."
...especially my sock drawer - you could film a Stephen King movie in
there...
Fred
> Since 85mm soft lenses were mentioned recently...
And, there are some 3rd-party lenses, too. A couple of interesting
examples: Hoya (Tokina) 85/2.5 and Tamron 70-150/2.8.
Fred
G'day from Oz Wiggy,
Welcome aboard. It's always good to have another voice to add to the mayhem
BTW, very funny blog :-)
Dave S
On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 17:45:03, wigwam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wanted to introduce myself. I've been a user of Pentax M42 screw-mount
> prime lenses on my
I downloaded and tried JAlbum based on comments here. If I didn't have
Photoshop which includes an automated web gallery maker, JAlbum would be a
good choice. However, compared to the Photoshop Web Gallery feature,
JAlbum is a bit more complicated to use, although that assessment may, at
least in
>On 3 Jun 2005 at 20:08, Dario Bonazza wrote:
>
>> What about an aperture ring around the lens throat of the camera?
>> Just a thought.
>
>Now this is an innovative, interesting and practical solution, well done
>Dario.
But unfortunately the wrong solution ;-)
Since acquiring some non-Pentax gear
97 matches
Mail list logo
