Hi Kostas,
Two nice photographs, the first nicer than the other and
I'd like to attempt an explanation, at least of what went
on in my mind.
In the first my eye fell on a bright spot towards the top
left of the picture and it was a tiny movement to your son's
face. The rest of the picture fit th
Cotty, mte- no-one is a wuss for using air-con in Oz! In-car
temperatures in the sun can reach over 100C in summer - some dogs have been
cooked when their careless owners have left them in the car with the windows
up. Nearly happened to at least a couple of babies too...
John Coyle
Brisb
On Sep 11, 2005, at 8:23 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
If I am getting what you are saying, you are talking
about a special optical device BETWEEN the image forming
lens and the sensor. If that's what your talking about
then yes that would always be "active" but we havent
been discussing something
Very natural and nice. I do miss the technical data though.
Regards
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 12. september 2005 00:32
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: RE: PESO - Dimples X 2
Hi Bru
Very nice shot, Boris! I like the composition, and the frame works well,
too. I've seen quite a few shots in magazines by photographic artists that
were similar in concept but not as good as yours.
Pat White
Hi!
back from vacation and a random grab-bag of photos in chronological
order. all taken within a couple of hours' drive of Calgary.
http://users.bestweb.net/~hchong/Seasonal/
Herb, beside the weather (being +24 outside my window and it is 7am) you
gave me rather complete sense of presence.
Hi!
This morning my daughter was watching the muppets on TV. I was
sitting there and looked over at her and noticed how nice the side
light from the far window was on her. I told her not to move and went
and got my camera. Of course, as I walked back into the room, she had
jumped down and got
Hi!
I have been busy as a bee trying to capture some pictures of insects. It's
not so easy to photograph a motive flying away or move a lot. But it's good
practice :-)
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1604475
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1604525
http://www.photosig.com/go/
Hi!
Never posted a PAW before. This is actually two, but very similar
pictures. I would normally dislike the first one, as I have chopped the
son's head on the left:
http://www.epcc.ed.ac.uk/%7ekavousan/GandA.jpg (<100KB)
However this one I like less, but do you agree/understand why?
http:/
Hi!
It's beautiful, Boris.
Thanks.
I opened it on the black background as you suggested and it looks very
nice, I love the quality of the light. I then became curious and took a
copy, removed all the bordering black, and put it on a white
background. To make the relative contrasts and t
-Original Message-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 7:39 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: First non DSLR digicam with 10MP APS sensor- contradiction
On Sep 11, 2005, at 3:51 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> My sketch was a simple
-Original Message-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 7:39 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: First non DSLR digicam with 10MP APS sensor- contradiction
On Sep 11, 2005, at 3:51 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> My sketch was a simple
Frankie Lee wrote:
Are their viewfinder is bright enough in focusing manual lens?
I thought so, but I did have some problems in low light with manual
focusing.
Are they durable in heavy usage?
Mine wasn't. Had it repaired twice under extended warranty, once since
(at my own expense) and
Now available for viewing and commentary:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/36.htm
Many thanks in advance!
enjoy
Godfrey
The disappearance of Tri-X would certainly be a major disappointment.
Let's not even think about it. Of course, Kodak long ago quit producing a
number of other films they shouldn't have stopped making.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Evan Hanson
> And Kodak if you should ever happen to read
It's obvious dpreview is "supported" by Canon - they're one of
the biggest advertisers, IIRC (and they always make sure that
Phil gets the latest Canon models to test, as soon as possible).
But apart from good marketing by Canon, I think most of the
complaints are just sour grapes. Sure, Phil gi
Which might lend some credence to recent reports that Dpreview is somehow
supported by Canon?
Shel
"Am I paranoid or perceptive?"
> [Original Message]
> From: John Francis
> > >>Looks like Mikey's calling it quits on the SMP articles..
> > >
> > >You won't be seeing anything from him on the d
That would either cure my depression , or, reminding me that I'm getting
older, throw me into a deeper funk. It did look like a couple of those
outfits could not be worn in public without getting the wearer arrested. :)
Butch
--- Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to retrieve the leader of a roll of 35 mm
> film
> with one of those spring metal thingies.
>
> Once upon a time, I was pretty good at this, but
> haven't had to use it in years, and my skills have
> decayed.
>
> Would someone kindly remind me
I need to retrieve the leader of a roll of 35 mm film
with one of those spring metal thingies.
Once upon a time, I was pretty good at this, but
haven't had to use it in years, and my skills have
decayed.
Would someone kindly remind me how to do it?
Rick
_
In a message dated 9/11/2005 6:41:02 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>John, you are always signed up . If I remember correctly, you
>have been to every one of them.
>--
>Bruce
JF> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 08:39:22AM -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote:
>>
>> Current possible attend
In a message dated 9/11/2005 4:30:43 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Define "miss", define "important"... ;-).
It is all in the archives...
But yes, Shel, bought an *istDS which had some problems I believe...
Boris
=
And Marnie aka Doe bought a used Optio s4i that ha
John, you are always signed up . If I remember correctly, you
have been to every one of them.
--
Bruce
Sunday, September 11, 2005, 6:27:08 PM, you wrote:
JF> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 08:39:22AM -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote:
>>
>> Current possible attendees:
>> . . .
>> John Francis
JF> Fun
In a message dated 9/11/2005 5:44:46 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No - he's banned.
I didn't see the posts in question, but reportedly he was warned
by Phil about some negative comments he made about the Canon 5D,
and responded with some gratuitous flameage.
==
Hehe
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 08:39:22AM -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote:
>
> Current possible attendees:
> . . .
> John Francis
Funny - I don't remember signing up :-)
As it turns out, the chances of my showing up just increased
significantly (especially since somebody mentioned there may
be fast-movi
Nice work. Love the canyon shots. Beautiful.
Paul
On Sep 11, 2005, at 9:16 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 11, 2005, at 5:37 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
back from vacation and a random grab-bag of photos in chronological
order. all taken within a couple of hours' drive of Calgary.
http://users
i held the camera out the window and snapped for that one. all the rest from
the sequence of 5 shots were motion blurred.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: GESO: Southwestern Alberta
N
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I noticed a couple of web sites mention that the istDS is supposed to come
with CR-2016 Lithium Batteries for the date function. I didn't see such a
battery in the package I received, nor can I find any mention of it in the
copy of the manual that I have. This is one of t
I'm sure that's true. But I wouldn't want to change my monitor even if
it wasn't perfectly accurate since it matches my printer's output. But
I doubt that it's off by a visibly detectable amount. I can look at the
skin tones of other images that are accurate and see that they match my
skin tone
On Sep 11, 2005, at 5:37 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
back from vacation and a random grab-bag of photos in chronological
order. all taken within a couple of hours' drive of Calgary.
http://users.bestweb.net/~hchong/Seasonal/
Nice set of photos. IMGP8657.jpg is brilliant, my favorite from the
g
Thanks Lasse. Great find.
Paul
On Sep 11, 2005, at 7:26 PM, Lasse Karlsson wrote:
Hi all,
I've been spending a couple of hours browsing and watching some very
good photography at the site below.
I thought someone else might enjoy it too, in case you don't already
know about it.
Nice layou
Let me speak up for number 2. I much prefer the facial expression.
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 04:23:10PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I agree. The first one is the best, but both are keepers. You have a
> beautiful daughter.
> Paul
> On Sep 11, 2005, at 3:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 04:25:14PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> No reason given? Perhaps just too much work?
> On Sep 11, 2005, at 3:47 PM, John Francis wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:30:25AM -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
> >>Looks like Mikey's calling it quits on the SMP articles..
> >
>
back from vacation and a random grab-bag of photos in chronological order.
all taken within a couple of hours' drive of Calgary.
http://users.bestweb.net/~hchong/Seasonal/
Herb
On Sep 11, 2005, at 4:32 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
The only thing resembling calibration that i've performed with my
monitor is to run the Apple System Preferences display calibration.
I convert all my digital images to Generic RGB and print on an
Epson 2200 using Epson paper profiles and Ap
I forgot to add the picture in question was taken with the K1000 & the M50
f2.
On Sep 11, 2005, at 3:51 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
My sketch was a simple sketch ( that obviously not
a real lens design with two convex lenses) and I
explaied I was showing the ACTIVE area of the rear
element so it does not matter where the nodal point
because if the entire active area gets cl
Ok, as I type this I'm looking at a projection of a Kodachrome I made way
back in 1984 of Yosemite Valley, I have to say it's absolutely stunning.
It's like being there and it reminds me why I'm not ready to give up film
yet. I think I may break out the box of European slides and annoy the kids
wi
Jorn,
#1, the blue flower is fantastic! ...wonderful framing of the subject and color.
#2, the Bee on the pink flower is OK.
#3, the butterfly is a little unsharp thru the body and antenna.
If this is your first try, you are doing great!
Bob
On 9/11/05, Jorn Ostergaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
The only thing resembling calibration that i've performed with my
monitor is to run the Apple System Preferences display calibration. I
convert all my digital images to Generic RGB and print on an Epson 2200
using Epson paper profiles and Apple Colorsynch. My prints are an exact
match of my mon
Hi all,
I've been spending a couple of hours browsing and watching some very good
photography at the site below.
I thought someone else might enjoy it too, in case you don't already know
about it.
Nice layout too.
This is what they say at their index page:
"19th and 20th Century Photograp
I did.
Very much so.
Thanks.
Lasse
- Original Message -
From: "John Graves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 4:31 PM
Subject: [Fwd:]
I don't usually do this but I thought some on the list might find this
sight interesting.
John Graves
Interesting articl
Thanks, Marnie. I actually put it together for another venue, then thought
I'd post it to the list. I was quite serious in wanting to get Paul to put
up a PESO - Paul with a car and a camera are always entertaining, and this
time was no different.
The "Rookery" photo has been up here before, and
Secondly, I totally agree that increasing
the nodal point away from the sensor while
maintaining the same focal length will help
the digital sensor / lens interface with respect
to keep the lens rays more parallel incidence
at sensor plane but there is a heavy price
for that , the retrofocus lenses
I have my monitor calibrated with a Gretag-Macbeth Eye One Display
and use the paper profiles provided HP and QuadToneRIP for color and
B&W printing, respectively. The result, when using a fully color-
managed workflow in Photoshop, is extremely consistent color/
grayscale rendering from scre
-Original Message-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 6:05 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: First non DSLR digicam with 10MP APS sensor- contradiction
On Sep 9, 2005, at 2:27 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> I did a quick sketch to
Actually, depending on what gear I bring, I'd be able to carry it around
for you.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Shel Belinkoff
> Hi Patsy ...
>
> Sure, if it's no trouble for you to bring it and carry it around.
> > In addition to seeing Godfrey's 20-35, would you be interested in
seein
Hello all,
I have been busy as a bee trying to capture some pictures of insects. It's
not so easy to photograph a motive flying away or move a lot. But it's good
practice :-)
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1604475
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1604525
http://www.photosig.
Hi Patsy ...
Sure, if it's no trouble for you to bring it and carry it around. In all
honesty, constant aperture lenses are of greater interest to me, but then
again, I don't think I've ever seen, and certainly not used, a variable
aperture lens. Oh, wait, I think John Celio's 18~35 is a variabl
On Sep 9, 2005, at 12:24 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=215716
Please try to click on the image so that it will open on total
black background - the way I intended it to be watched.
It's beautiful, Boris.
I opened it on the black background as y
Hi Bruce ...
Both are great, although I prefer the second one for the facial expression
and what is arguably a more comfortable and relaxed pose and feel to it.
Both are quite nice, however.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Bruce Dayton
> These two shots were of her own posing, more or less
Definitely number 2. The gravitas of the very young is quite appealing.
The out of focus forground works in this case, althought traditionally it
isn't supposed to.
Nice job.
J.
--- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 1:35 PM
i'm looking for two Asahi Pentax spring loaded lens caps for 49mm thread
lenses. these caps will go onto an M50/2 and a M50/1.7. the silver paint
must be in good condition and the caps must be reasonably clean and scratch
free. i have a pair of slip-on 51mm ones that keep falling off.
Herb
On Sep 9, 2005, at 2:27 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I did a quick sketch to clarify what I said:
http://www.jcoconnell.com/temp/rearanglediagram.jpg
Your sketch is misleading: it exaggerates the relative sizing of the
sensor target compared to the lens and also does not indicate where
the n
On Sep 11, 2005, at 11:50 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Welcome back ...
Thanks.
I tend to agree with you, but I've just gotta see for myself. It's
not
just the extra stop that's of interest, although that's the prime
consideration, but other factors such as the characteristics of the
imag
Hello,
I have been busy as a bee trying to capture some pictures of insects. It's
not so easy to photograph a motive flying away or move a lot. But it's good
practice :-)
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1604475
Best regards, Jorn
--
Jeg beskyttes af den gratis SPAMfighter til privatb
On 11/9/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Here's an oldie, from a few years ago. Today being an anniversary, and my
>mood being such as it is, I decided to post this again. Large file.
>
>http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/seibel.html
Thanks Shel. I mentioned this is another thre
While we're on the subject, and since it's 9/11 today, I have 9 digest
posts from 9/11 in 2001 in case anyone wants to see them. Email me off list.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 11/9/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>Dave(getting back to home printing more)Brooks
Dave, I thought you were buying a Mac??
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
No reason given? Perhaps just too much work?
On Sep 11, 2005, at 3:47 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:30:25AM -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
Looks like Mikey's calling it quits on the SMP articles..
You won't be seeing anything from him on the dpreview site, either ..
I agree. The first one is the best, but both are keepers. You have a
beautiful daughter.
Paul
On Sep 11, 2005, at 3:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/11/2005 12:16:59 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These two shots were of her own posing, more or less. Al
Robert Whitehouse wrote:
Is there a decent archive for PDML? - I know about the one on
mail-archive.com but this only seems to go back a few weeks.
It is surely a terrible waste if all the wonderful pearls of wisdom
dispensed here over the years are not available in a searchable archive.
Rob W
Yes, it's not bad, actually. Quite good. Like most Pentax consumer lenses -
surprisingly good for the price tag.
I got mine for 50 USD and a faulty MZ-50 body.
I have tested it against two Tokina lenses:
http://gallery37564.fotopic.net/p9124135.html
Don't forget to watch it full size (button bewlow
Shel,
In addition to seeing Godfrey's 20-35, would you be interested in seeing a
Tokina 20-35/3.5-4.5 autofocus lens at the Pixel Party? It's not the 2.8, but
it's mostly metal constructed, as far as I can tell and quite a bit heavier
than my other Pentax lenses. As far as image quality, you wil
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:30:25AM -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
> Looks like Mikey's calling it quits on the SMP articles..
You won't be seeing anything from him on the dpreview site, either ..
Both are pretty good.
For me it's not a tough choice, not at all. Num two is better composed, but
the infants hand makes it in num one. They seem to be better "connected" in
that one. Num two is more correct, but lacks the little extra "touch".
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never
Bruce,
She's a beautiful dimple hostess.
Extremely nice lighting. Delicate and appealing.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This morning my daughter was watching the muppets on
> TV. I was
> sitting there and looked over at her and noticed how
> nice the side
> light from the f
Hi Robert, some of us have personal archives going quite far back - I
have archived more interesting posts (and sometimes just the whole
mailbox) on PDML from back when I joined - 2000? 2001?
It could be possible to put these together from a lot of the oldtimers
here (and I joined quite early comp
BH> The *istDS allow me to adjust the white balance to the lighting,
BH> holding up a white or gray card before the camera etc. Hopefully,
BH> this will work even with leds!
For some high power LEDs, try Lumileds - I am trying to get some
locally for use in a flashlight.
One particular problem in
In a message dated 9/11/2005 12:16:59 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These two shots were of her own posing, more or less. Although taken
very close together, they each have a very different feel to them.
Pentax *istD, FA 50/1.4, handheld
ISO 800, 1/45 sec @ f/2.0
Converted
This morning my daughter was watching the muppets on TV. I was
sitting there and looked over at her and noticed how nice the side
light from the far window was on her. I told her not to move and went
and got my camera. Of course, as I walked back into the room, she had
jumped down and got the do
I like them both. I think the reactions are a little more animated and
interesting on the first. As you noted the frame is better on the
second. Tough choice, but both are quite nice.
Paul
On Sep 11, 2005, at 2:28 PM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
Never posted a PAW before. This is actually two
Nice composition. Interesting geometry. I like it.
Paul
On Sep 11, 2005, at 2:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/11/2005 10:09:33 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=216097
No manipulation except regular RAW
Hi Jens,
I don't know the system they use. All I know is that they bought their
hardware less than a year ago, and that it was a big investment for
the company. They take NOK 500,- per profile they make. You will need
one profile per paper type per printer.
their web presence is this: http:/
Welcome back ...
I tend to agree with you, but I've just gotta see for myself. It's not
just the extra stop that's of interest, although that's the prime
consideration, but other factors such as the characteristics of the image
and build quality are also factors that I'd consider.
Shel
> [Ori
In a message dated 9/11/2005 10:09:33 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=216097
No manipulation except regular RAW processing, and resizing for web...
Boris
Rather nice, Boris. And the people shooters can't complain
Not so much a leap as just testing the waters - getting my feet wet, so to
speak. However, I am excited about trying the camera and exploring the
possibilities of digital a little more than with a P&S camera. Not having
to process film is a very appealing ... and using a plastic zoom lens is
cert
Never posted a PAW before. This is actually two, but very similar
pictures. I would normally dislike the first one, as I have chopped
the son's head on the left:
http://www.epcc.ed.ac.uk/%7ekavousan/GandA.jpg (<100KB)
However this one I like less, but do you agree/understand why?
http://www
About 11mb. They're not THAT large compared some scans, but they are
larger than a lot of RAW files from 6mp cameras, and certainly a lot larger
than the approximately 1.5mb files of the large JPEG's the camera generates.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: keith_w Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> > I
In a message dated 9/11/2005 11:12:19 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Same here. No vintage posts.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
==
Of course, the vintage posts have sepia tones. :-)
I've never been able to go back far either.
Marnie aka Doe
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Don Sanderson wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 11:59 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Pentax SMC F 35-135 f3.5-4.5
Look out for the bokeh (240KB, folks :-)
http://www.epcc.ed
Same here. No vintage posts.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Whitehouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11. septemb
Thanks Shel.
Nice to see Pentax get some recognition for the DS. :-)
Godfrey
On Sep 10, 2005, at 8:26 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
September, 2005: DIWA (Digital Imaging Websites Association), a
world-wide
organization of collaborating websites, today announces that Pentax
has
received their f
That's a beautiful shot Kostas.
Shame about the Bokeh, makes it look like the owl was
positioned in front of a painting of grass. ;-)
Certainly seperated the subject though.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005
On Sep 11, 2005, at 11:03 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=216097
No manipulation except regular RAW processing, and resizing for web...
Very striking, beautiful colors and composition. Nice!
Godfrey
I meant; Shel is wise man. But if you prefer vice man, ok, it's up to you.
My typos can be a "slightly" misleading ;-)
I hate him, but he is my man.
(I might end up being hooked on (virtual) darkroom chemicals)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupid
On Sep 11, 2005, at 8:30 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
Looks like Mikey's calling it quits on the SMP articles. I've
thoroughly enjoyed them for the last couple years. I think I may have
learned a thing or two from them, I've certainly disagreed with some
of them, and I think my enablement bug ca
Making my own, I'd worry about spectral qualities particularly for
color work.
However, I prefer to use flash for small object photography anyway.
The Patterson E-Flash units have caught my eye: they're not overly
expensive and are only $75 apiece. Seems about perfect for lots of
uses lik
David Savage wrote:
G'day Kieth,
They came over in a Volkswagen Touareg V6 turbo diesel with all the
bells and whistles. It's a very very very nice car.
At least he can say that he's taken it off road, unlike most of the
urban terrors on the streets
Dave
Thanks you sir!
I tend to NOT get
On Sep 10, 2005, at 10:52 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
Does that mean the S loses its setting if you don't use it for 48
hours? Or only if the main batteries are removed for 48 hours?
The latter.
But I always toss a set of fresh batteries in RIGHT AWAY when I
remove dead ones for charging.
i'm cleaning out stuff i hardly or never use anymore. all items are in
original boxes with original documentation.
Pentax 77mm circular polarizer - opened, never used $100
Pentax AA-Battery Pack FG - never opened, never used $20
Pentax SMCP A50/2 - opened, never used $35
Pentax SMCP FA 80-320/4.
Just got back from a two-day jaunt to Tijuana and back. Not really a
photographic trip, but I did carry the camera and 20-35/4, 35/2,
50/1.7 and 28-105/3.2-4.5 lenses. With the Pentax gear, this all fits
in a nice, small, light bag. Such a difference from trying to carry
my 10D in a similar
Perhaps doing something wrong but I can't seem to find anything older than
May '05 ?
> -Original Message-
> From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 September 2005 18:09
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: RE: PDML Long term Archive
>
> I thought it went back quite a
Thanks Boris. Toddlers are a lot of fun.
On Sep 11, 2005, at 2:01 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
We celebrated my grand daughter's first birthday today. My wife was
going to feed her a piece of cake with a spoon, but Grace beat her to
it. She picked it up and got right to it. That's my girl.
On Sep 10, 2005, at 6:03 AM, Fred wrote:
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/temp/pad-istd.jpg
Thanks, guys - now I see what you mean - I'm gonna see if I can
find one of
those critters...
I've not found this modification necessary on the DS, but you can get
such bumpers or feet at Home Depot
i meant above.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Stock Photography - once again
that is definitely about average.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTE
On Sep 9, 2005, at 7:09 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
No more distraught than I am. I had the camera but three days and
only
made 9,786 exposures. I was just starting to get used to it.
Jeez. Hardly even got started.
]'-)
Godfrey
Thanks Bruce.
On Sep 11, 2005, at 12:24 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello Paul,
The lighting worked out very well to capture this cute moment. This
will be a pic that others, including her, will want to see well into
the future. Very nicely done.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, September 10,
5n also has bracketing.
Less useful feature but it is still there.
2005/9/10, Frankie Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi
>
> Anyone could tell me the major functional difference between MZ-5 and MZ-3? I
> may choose one of them. Thanks.
>
> --
> __
> Check
that is definitely about average.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 11:46 AM
Subject: RE: OT: Stock Photography - once again
Thanks, Paul. That's appr.: Post 40 photgraphs, sell 1 a year!
It doesn't sound like
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
