My friend's IIIf has the self-timer. The serial number is 699201. According
to my Leica book, the red dial IIIf has a different shutter design to
earlier versions.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 September 2005 04:04
> To:
I was in Fry's yesterday and looked at them; I haven't seen any 4G
ones available just yet, I think I saw they had the 2G models in
stock. 133x is impressive for download speed, makes little difference
in the camera. But I think I'll stick with 1G cards for the moment.
93-97 exposures per c
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:56:28 +0200, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 27/9/05, Lucas Rijnders, discombobulated, unleashed:
On a related subject: I use my left eye when photographing, like miss
Nikon from Jens's link does. Someone once told me to use my right eye,
Interesting one this, I ha
While looking for another SD card, I found these:
http://www.pretec.com/product/SSD/SD/SD.htm
133x, up to 4GB capacity
Shel
I am unsubscribing for a week or so. Maybe a tinge longer.
I have been "overlisting." I need to get some work done, and since I can't
seem to resist reading (and replying) to posts, I've decided I need to
unsubscribe for a while. I don't seem to have the restraint just to lurk.
I'll see NorCal
On Sep 29, 2005, at 6:53 PM, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
[...] and one master who does not need his eyes at all ;-)
The farce is strong in this one.
- Dave
Hi G ...
The idea seems nice, but I'm not convinced that the durability of the card
doesn't suffer. I'll let the early adapters use 'em for a while. Speaking
for myself, I don't use a separate card reader except perhaps when using a
friend's computer. The machine here has a built in multi-card r
On 28/9/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>Based on my conversations with the folks doing power for laptops,
>it's far trickier than you might think. Battery state is pretty dynamic.
Professional video camera batteries include 'logic' electronics status, a
method of communicat
On 28/9/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Happily, it's generally good enough. Have backups ready when they get
>to half. Replace when they show empty. What more do you really need? ;-)
Viable fuel cell technology!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
Sounds like a replacement for the 35mm full frame FA Fisheye Zoom.
Don't know the exact specifications, but it was listed on Pentax's Lens
roadmap.
Glen wrote:
At 12:02 AM 9/29/2005, P. J. Alling wrote:
Only fisheye I've heard of for APS Digital is Pentax's planned DA
Fish-eye Zoom lens.
Hi!
I figured I should try to get some Pentax content in my PAWs:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3755687&size=lg
Frank, you're a friggin' ARTIST!
I'd second that.
Boris
Actually I think this is better than if you had centered the bird in the
frame, it gives a feeling of movement.
David Mann wrote:
Resending as I accidentally sent it from the wrong account which
caused it to disappear into a virtual black hole.
Hi all,
A semi-successful attempt at timing
Hi!
Stopped by the farmer's market in Birmingham, Michigan this morning.
Snapped a few pics of this country gospel singer and his young partner.
*istD, DA 50-200 at 80mm, f8 at 1/250th, RAW.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3757379&size=lg
LOL.
Boris
On 28/9/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>We're hoping you'll trade us Florida for Quebec eventually.
That so you can be closer to Castro?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Yes, I was agreeing with you!
J
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:08:47 +0100, David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sep 29, 2005, at 5:35 PM, John Forbes wrote:
The background is superb, great DOF, nice composition, lovely light.
All that's needed (IMO) is for the shot to have been taken a fra
On Sep 29, 2005, at 7:59 PM, Cotty wrote:
Viable fuel cell technology!
Get with the times... even Holgas don't need batteries. Unless you
buy the 120SF model - how many other medium format cameras have a
built-in flash?
- Dave
On 29/9/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
>1GB is fine for me right now as well. I've a couple of 512mb cards, and am
>looking to add one or two 1GB cards. For now I think I'm going to grab an
>80X Transcend. Price/Performance ratio seems pretty good @ New Egg. That
>should DL in
And it's not even a Canon Rebel...
http://shop.lomography.com/oktomat/
I'd love to play with one.
- Dave
PLEASE include the URL when quoting or referencing pix. Often the original
post doesn't make it to the list or the archives, at least for some people.
This has been suggested/requested several times on the list by a few
people.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thursday, September 29, 2005, 9:59:11 AM, Cotty wrote:
C> On 28/9/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>Happily, it's generally good enough. Have backups ready when they get
>>to half. Replace when they show empty. What more do you really need? ;-)
C> Viable fuel cell technology!
Yeah. I like it a lot - good environment shot.
Bill Sawyer
Livonia, MI
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 8:30 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Peso - Blue Butt
I gave the wrong URL Duh
should be:
http://mypeople
The frame count was a warning. I've found that's the only way to be
sure about my batteries, and it's part of why I went back to lithiums
after a brief and somewhat painful NIMh experiment. I know a set of
lithiums, with battery grip installed, will give me about 2000 frames.
If I have an impor
The serial number suggests that it's a very late production IIIfRD. In
mint condition and with the self timer, it should be quite valuable. It
must have been quite a thrill to shoot with it. Mine is just a nice
user, which is perfect because I wouldn't be happy not using it from
time to time. I
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, P. J. Alling wrote:
Nope, no granularity at all, just Full, Half, Empty.. Sometimes Half goes
back to Full, depends on how
much juice you've just used.
I have measured the current that the -DS pulls during various
operations (AF, meter, bulb shutter, memory write, memor
IMHO the best is to allow usage of both AA and proprietary lithiums.
Best of the two worlds.
IMO, that's close to the best. It would be even better if the
"proprietary" lithiums weren't proprietary. Two ways I can think of to do
it:
- Make them almost the same form-factor as AA's, but incl
Gotcha. Thanks. I had come across an older review of this lens with
the Canon mount. The reviewer mentioned the lens was not coupling. I
couldn't find anything specific to Pentax on the issue. Perhaps this
reviewer was actually using the M42 mount lens and an adapter.
Thanks again.
On 9/29/0
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Glen wrote:
What fisheye options are there for the *istDS? I'd be interested in hearing
about either circular fisheye lenses or full-frame fisheye lenses. I'm not
too interested in hearing about fisheye lenses made for full-frame use, but
ones especially designed for the d
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Sony's done it best in their cameras with the InfoLithium cells ... each
battery has logic in it that communicates with the camera to estimate how
much time is left. I found the accuracy to be remarkable.
Is the price equally remarkable?
Kostas
AA lithiums are available today. I use them in my cameras.
Paul
On Sep 29, 2005, at 7:02 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
IMHO the best is to allow usage of both AA and proprietary lithiums.
Best of the two worlds.
IMO, that's close to the best. It would be even better if the
"proprietary" lithium
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Glen wrote:
A fisheye zoom? That sounds freaky. Does anyone have more information about
it? Is there a URL which describes it?
There is already the Fisheye 17-28, but its efeect will be different
on the DSLRs:
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/lenses/zooms/short/F17-28f3.5-4.5-Fi
Thursday, September 29, 2005, 1:02:28 PM, Cory wrote:
>> IMHO the best is to allow usage of both AA and proprietary lithiums.
>> Best of the two worlds.
>>
CP> IMO, that's close to the best. It would be even better if the
CP> "proprietary" lithiums weren't proprietary. Two ways I can thi
Thursday, September 29, 2005, 1:32:01 PM, Paul wrote:
PS> AA lithiums are available today. I use them in my cameras.
Rechargeable? I haven't heard of that yet.
Good light!
fra
Canon EF mount is purely electronic coupling, not mechanical. Which is
likely the issue.
-Adam
Scott Loveless wrote:
Gotcha. Thanks. I had come across an older review of this lens with
the Canon mount. The reviewer mentioned the lens was not coupling. I
couldn't find anything specific to
Rechargeable and standard. I don't use the rechargeables because Pentax
doesn't recommend them, althoughI seem to recall I've reports here that
some have used them successfully.
Paul
On Sep 29, 2005, at 7:40 AM, Frantisek wrote:
Thursday, September 29, 2005, 1:32:01 PM, Paul wrote:
PS> AA lit
Bruce,
Great subject, but background problems...
Regards, Bob S.
On 9/25/05, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For several mornings, I have observed these particular plants with the
> intention of capturing them in good light. I finally went out and did
> the task. The image that most s
1074 hits on the web page and 110 submissions so far.
We've come to a screeching halt!
Let's get it going again, spread the word.
Tell your friends, neighbors, dogs, cats,
second cousins twice removed, whatever!
Seriously though, every time one of you posted this
to another list or fo
On 9/25/05, Charles Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried to take some photos at a show with my "kit" lens and figured
> out after about 5 minutes that it was a hopeless disaster. Too dark,
> the focus would take forever. And the lens is just too slow at f5.6
> from most of the zoom range
On 9/25/05, Markus Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorry if you get it twice, I did not see this one on the list and had no
> reactions so far...
> Markus
>
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Markus Maurer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 5:09 AM
> >>To: pe
On 9/23/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using this car for a while and decided a little snap was in order. I
> used the 77mm lens on the DS, and found the perspective pleasing. However,
> the sharpness of the license plate and deck emblem leaves something to be
> desired. I'm
Very nice, Kenneth! Everything is technically
spot-on, the composition is nice, and the look of
satisfaction with simple pleasures on the bear's face
is the finishing touch.
Rick
--- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I gave the wrong URL Duh
> should be:
>
>
http://mypeoplepc.com/mem
Wow. Position of the head, expression, dof, environment, all work
together to make this one really nice. Great job.
dk
On 9/28/05, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I gave the wrong URL Duh
> should be:
>
> http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
>
> Comments solicit
On 9/27/05, Markus Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Frank
> thanks for looking.
You're welcome.
> How's your new job doing?
Thanks for asking, it's going fine. It got very busy right after
Labour Day, and it can be very high pressure and stressful some days,
but it's still interesting, an
On 9/28/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Frank. Believe it or not, that's one of those decisive monent things.
> the blades were rotating at slightly different speeds, and I waited about 10
> minutes for them to line up.
>
I'm even more impressed than I was before!
-fran
Nice photo, good capture. Your own pic and speech are
good too.
Regards
Albano
--- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I gave the wrong URL Duh
> should be:
>
>
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
>
> Comments solicited - yeah, nay or other wise
>
> Kenneth Wa
On 9/28/05, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I gave the wrong URL Duh
> should be:
>
> http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
>
> Comments solicited - yeah, nay or other wise
Great composition/framing. Wonderful subject, beautifully captured.
A typical Waller phot
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty"
Subject: Re: Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film?
On 28/9/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
We're hoping you'll trade us Florida for Quebec eventually.
That so you can be closer to Castro?
It's rumoured that Maggie Trudeau and
On 9/29/05, David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And it's not even a Canon Rebel...
>
> http://shop.lomography.com/oktomat/
>
> I'd love to play with one.
>
Lomo would be a fun camera. One day, I'll probably get one; they're
in my price range.
I wonder when they're going to come out with a
On 9/29/05, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/29/05, David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And it's not even a Canon Rebel...
> >
> > http://shop.lomography.com/oktomat/
> >
> > I'd love to play with one.
> >
>
> Lomo would be a fun camera. One day, I'll probably get one; they
On 9/29/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
>
> It's rumoured that Maggie Trudeau and [Castro] were lovers.
>
Actually, I believe that was Pierre Trudeau, wasn't it?
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 9/29/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am unsubscribing for a week or so. Maybe a tinge longer.
>
> I have been "overlisting." I need to get some work done, and since I can't
> seem to resist reading (and replying) to posts, I've decided I need to
> unsubscribe for a while. I
On 9/29/05, David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Resending as I accidentally sent it from the wrong account which
> caused it to disappear into a virtual black hole.
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > A semi-successful attempt at timing the shutter release.
> >
> > This one is off the same roll as my previou
>
> From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/09/29 Thu PM 01:33:37 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film?
>
> On 9/29/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > It's rumoured that Maggie Trudeau and [Castro] were
On 9/28/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> .. here's the door. Saw this while bopping around the neighborhood
> earlier this afternoon. Maybe you've a thought about why the sign is on
> the house.
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/heresthedoor.html
>
It certainly is a door!
Got an e-m this am saying that a purchase had been made to a
jewelry store in LA for $175.xx, or thereabouts.
And it looked like a real PayPal email.
BUT ... it wasn't.
So be careful.
Look @ the HTML for the email. It's from ".pl".
And it has a "cancel payment" function -- not a normal PayPal ope
12 to 18 months, plenty of life, it's time to buy a new camera by then
anyway.
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
IMHO the best is to allow usage of both AA and proprietary lithiums.
Best of the two worlds.
IMO, that's close to the best. It would be even better if the
"proprietary" lithiums weren't
The Zenitar is a K mount not Ka, on the Canon it would be non coupling,
the EOS mount is all
electronic. Theres nothing electronic in the Zenitar for it to couple
with.
Scott Loveless wrote:
Gotcha. Thanks. I had come across an older review of this lens with
the Canon mount. The reviewer
On 9/23/05, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> G'day All.
>
> This week my little corner of the world has been treated to some
> beautiful sunsets. Unfortunately, I've had to work through them all.
> Except today.
>
> As I tend to do when I want to relax & unwind, I went down to the
> harbor
Frank, you're going to have to learn to dunk you're own B&W it's not
hard and only takes an hour or so per roll, About the time you needed to
go to the lab. Then you'll need a film scanner...
frank theriault wrote:
On 9/27/05, Markus Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Frank
thanks for
This is a really nice shot. I wish I could do as well with some of my
wildlife photos.
(I was wondering where the blue butt was in this on however...
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/ )
Kenneth Waller wrote:
I gave the wrong URL Duh
should be:
http://mypeoplepc.com/members
u, plastic
David Mann wrote:
And it's not even a Canon Rebel...
http://shop.lomography.com/oktomat/
I'd love to play with one.
- Dave
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
I thought it was a monogue(sp. damn I have enough trouble with English)
a trois...
frank theriault wrote:
On 9/29/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's rumoured that Maggie Trudeau and [Castro] were lovers.
Actually, I believe that was Pierre Trudeau, wasn't it?
-frank
Not to start another flame war, but I thought these were good posts on Dpreview:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=15223744
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=15224522
I know we have gone over this before and many of you might have already
On 9/29/05, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a really nice shot. I wish I could do as well with some of my
> wildlife photos.
Yes, but then we'd have to hate you...
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Bruce, thanks for commenting.
I have others where the bear is looking at me, I'll try to post one soon.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Peso - Blue Butt
Here I was thinkin' about how to comment on that first url .
There is a lot to like in this sho
Bill, thanks for looking & commenting.
(PS did you get the Sigma flash for the lower price?)
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: william sawyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Peso - Blue Butt
Yeah. I like it a lot - good environment shot.
Bill Sawyer
Livonia, MI
-Original M
Rick, thanks for taking the time to look & comment.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sep 29, 2005 8:43 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Peso - Blue Butt
Very nice, Kenneth! Everything is technically
spot-on, the composition is nice,
Dave, thanks for commenting.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Dave Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Peso - Blue Butt
Wow. Position of the head, expression, dof, environment, all work
together to make this one really nice. Great job.
dk
On 9/28/05, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL
Albano, thanks for taking the time to look & comment.
>Your own pic and speech are good too.
That photo is a rare one... it was taken by John Shaw.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Albano Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Peso - Blue Butt
Nice photo, good capture. Your o
Frank, thanks for looking & commenting.
>A typical Waller photo (that's high praise indeed).
I hope it keeps me on your list of people you hate
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Peso - Blue Butt
On 9/28/05, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL
I think this prediction is in line with what most of us have come to believe,
and I can't imagine that it would provoke a flame war. I'll be happy with a
higher resolution APSC replacement for the D. At least for now. My remaining
concern would be in regard to buffer size and write speed, but I
Thanks for the comments P.J.
>(I was wondering where the blue butt was in this on however...
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/ )
I'd call that one big butt!
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Peso - Blue Butt
This
On Sep 29, 2005, at 4:31 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
Sony's done it best in their cameras with the InfoLithium
cells ... each battery has logic in it that communicates with the
camera to estimate how much time is left. I found the accuracy to
be remarkable.
Is the price equally remar
On Sep 29, 2005, at 12:59 AM, Cotty wrote:
Happily, it's generally good enough. Have backups ready when they get
to half. Replace when they show empty. What more do you really
need? ;-)
Viable fuel cell technology!
Old technology. I saw a show featuring turbine engine development ...
mi
OTOH, I remember what their upgrade to the PZ-1p turned out to be. :( A
nice camera, but not very improved spec-wise.
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Future? What's next for Pentax...
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 1
Purchasers of the Zenitar 16 for Canon EOS mount get a Pentax M42
thread mount lens with an M42->EOS adapter. They only work fully
stopped down for both exposure and metering.
Godfrey
On Sep 29, 2005, at 4:03 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
Gotcha. Thanks. I had come across an older review of
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 29, 2005, at 4:31 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
Sony's done it best in their cameras with the InfoLithium cells ... each
battery has logic in it that communicates with the camera to estimate how
much time is left. I found the accuracy to
On Sep 29, 2005, at 8:57 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
Thanks for the answer. I asked a question, I did not pooh-pooh.
Kostas,
My apologies if it seemed like I was directing the comment towards
you specifically. I was speaking in a more general way: I read many
forums and the theme of
My experience mirrors your with the Sony batteries.
I have two for the DSC-S85, but one was included with the camera, so there
was a need to purchase only one. I didn't shop around - just bought the
second bat when and where I got the camera, and I may have paid about
$50.00 - $55.00 for it - may
I think the best thing to do, ever, is to don't click on *any* link
of *any* e-mail, even if they are real paypal / ebay/ bank/ecc mails.
(this of course does not apply to the pics posted here... lol)
Do they say you have to check your paypal page?
Do you think it's not an hoax?
fine, click on th
Ken,
You forgot to say thank you to me for looking and commenting. :)
Tom C.
From: Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Peso - Blue Butt
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:30:13 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
Rick, thanks for taking the ti
I suppose that, about the 40 DA, it's not that it doesn't cover the
full frame, but maybe it's quality is too poor on the edge to qualify
it as a full frame lens.
but then, I'm just guessing
danilo.
Hello Don,
One aspect that has not been discussed at all is the issue of lead
time. Many products have a design lead time that is quite long or
ahead of the product being built. What I am saying is that the list we
are compiling, even if looked at by Pentax wouldn't be able to acted
on until the
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 12:09:55PM -0600, Tom C wrote:
> I use my left eye. I find my shots are hit and miss if I try to look
> through and outside of the viewfinder at the same time. If I need to get a
> reference point, say on a moving object, I look at it normally and wait
> until it's clos
On 9/17/05, Vic Mortelmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My first PESO...
>
> Two pictures at once, shot with different lenses.
>
> http://users.pandora.be/vicmortelmans/fts/050900_Toon/
> http://users.pandora.be/vicmortelmans/fts/050900_Toon1/
>
> I selected this ones because composition, light and
Set the camera to release the shutter without CF card. Anything should
function. Except it can't store a picture. Yor camera is faulty, no doubt in
my mind!
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Rob Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 27. se
Tom C wrote:
OTOH, I remember what their upgrade to the PZ-1p turned out to be.
:( A nice camera, but not very improved spec-wise.
There was an upgrade to the PZ-1P?
At 11:54 AM 9/29/2005, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 29, 2005, at 12:59 AM, Cotty wrote:
Happily, it's generally good enough. Have backups ready when they get
to half. Replace when they show empty. What more do you really
need? ;-)
Viable fuel cell technology!
Old technology. I saw a sho
On Sep 29, 2005, at 9:37 AM, danilo wrote:
I suppose that, about the 40 DA, it's not that it doesn't cover the
full frame, but maybe it's quality is too poor on the edge to qualify
it as a full frame lens.
but then, I'm just guessing
From the examples I've seen with the DA40, it is at least
Hi Cotty,
Five years back? Probably not. However, a year - 18 months back, sure.
Remember, I've been shooting digi pics for quite some time, and have posted
a number of PAW's and PESO's using the Sony. For the past 12 to 18 months
I've been asking a lot of questions about the digi Pentaxes in
It was the MZ-S... :) Some of the specs were downgraded from the PZ-1p.
Upgrade may have been the wrong word. I should say replacement, because it
was then Pentax's flagship 35mm body as opposed to the PZ-1p.
Tom C.
From: "E.R.N. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.ne
The DA 40 is the one Pentax lens I'm remotely curious about, largely because
of its form factor.
Does anyone have anecdotal, or otherwise, evidence about it's performance?
Tom C.
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: PDML
Subject: Re: my after-wi
>>>Viable fuel cell technology!
>>
>>Old technology. I saw a show featuring turbine engine development ...
>>micro turbine engines, smaller than your thumbnail, are being
>>designed with the notion of powering microgenerators to self-recharge
>>Li-Ion batteries in devices. Jet powered cameras, anyo
At 01:19 PM 9/29/2005, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I really
dislike having to shoot color all the time and then make conversions in PS.
Maybe that will change, but, for me, there's nothing that can replace real
B&W film with the photos printed on silver paper.
I've recently been asked to shoot some
That was a different time and a different market. A pro spec film camera wasn't
going to make it for them. But the DSLR market is evolving. It's either keep up
or die.
Paul
> OTOH, I remember what their upgrade to the PZ-1p turned out to be. :( A
> nice camera, but not very improved spec-wis
On Sep 29, 2005, at 10:30 AM, Tom C wrote:
The DA 40 is the one Pentax lens I'm remotely curious about,
largely because of its form factor.
Does anyone have anecdotal, or otherwise, evidence about it's
performance?
A friend on the PAW list has one and has shown several photos which
att
Yes ... Platinum prints from digi is a project that's been on the back
burner for me for a while, but I have looked into it.
Here's a place to start ... there are a number of other options to explore,
but this was the first in my files.
http://www.bostick-sullivan.com/Gallery/Fokos/fokos.htm
As
Tom -
If I did I'll blame it on a senior moment.
Any who - thanks for taking the time to look & comment.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Peso - Blue Butt
Ken,
You forgot to say thank you to me for looking and commenting. :)
Tom C.
>F
I remember having seen sample images posted on the list, a side by side
comparison to the M 40/2.8, if I remember well.
Pancho
Tom C schrieb:
The DA 40 is the one Pentax lens I'm remotely curious about, largely
because of its form factor.
Does anyone have anecdotal, or otherwise, evidence ab
I have purchased a Canon Photo Vest. It has a Conon EOS logo on it. Not very
good.
Have you people got an idea how to make a Pentax Logo I can put on the vest.
I don't want to promote Pentax, rather than Canon. Pentax is the camera
brand I use the most.
Regards
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.
I have purchased a Canon Photo Vest. It has a Conon EOS logo on it. Not very
good.
Have you people got an idea how to make a Pentax Logo I can put on the vest.
I don't want to promote Canon, rather than pentax. Pentax is the camera
brand I use the most.
Regards
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
