Hi all,
Thanks for the responses and comments.
The main thing I've noticed with three is how little time there is to do
anything other than work, sleep and look after the kids. Someone's
always got a blood nose/pooy nappy/thirsty/hungry/etc
The list seem just the same, it's a bit like a soap
In a message dated 12/1/2005 2:32:35 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have several berets...
-frank frenchie theriault
Sorry, frank. Eating a beret is simply not as impressive as eating a Stetson.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
In a message dated 12/1/2005 3:09:55 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I was trying to say was that the way it was presented here,
shooting JPEG would be like using old MacOS, and RAW like using a purely
command line based Unix system. I want to have the GUI *and* the
On Dec 1, 2005, at 5:00 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 03:53:34PM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Dec 1, 2005, at 2:18 PM, John Francis wrote:
I don't need ACR 3.2, or whatever the latest version is; 3.1 (or
even 2.3)
works just fine with images from my D
I find that
In a message dated 12/1/2005 3:34:04 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think digital will *really* make a difference as and when the actual
media used in the camera becomes so low-cost and reliable that you won't
have to copy the data at all. (But I've probably mentioned
On Dec 1, 2005, at 9:38 AM, John Francis wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 04:15:49PM +, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Be aware that the difference in field of view between 90 and
105mm is
quite small. See
I buy from BH almost exclusively. They're very dependable.
Paul
On Dec 1, 2005, at 8:04 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Dec 1, 2005, at 6:45 AM, Pål Jensen wrote:
If the B+ H web page says something is in stock can one assume it
really is in stock?
Reputedly, this scanner is hard to get hold
I think most here would consider it the opposite of what you just said.
Tom C.
To me shooting JPEGs is like shooting negative film and shooting RAW is
like
shooting positive film.
In a message dated 12/1/2005 2:12:18 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Even if Pentax got 100% of the geek market, would that be significant?
We see post after post here bemoaning the fact that cameras are being
dumbed down to appeal to the masses - it seems unlikely that those
In a message dated 12/1/2005 6:12:39 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think most here would consider it the opposite of what you just said.
Tom C.
==
Dsylexia strikes again. RAW = slides, JPEG = print film.
Sheesh.
marnie who needs an interpreter
Did it strike again? :)
Raw is comparable to transparency film in that very little interpretation is
done to what could be considered the first generation image. After that the
analogy between digital files and film qucikly swings to one where Raw is
more analagous to negative film than to
I ordered two lenses from BH. They are on the $100 US rebate list.
One was in stock, the other was listed 'special order', but both had to
be billed as I ordered. The web site explained one would ship now, one later.
I did this on the web 11/21, order dated 11/23, and both arrived today! (12/1)
Can't pass up this opportunity come out and reveal the actual
physical repulsion I experienced each time I see a Velvia print
attempting to depict an element of the natural world.
Now, in a PS world of hue and tone sliders, I long for the limits
previously imposed by the availability of a single
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's no real reason for the player units to cost a lot, of course;
I can buy a cheap-ish 400-DVD carousel from a home audio-video store.
I did something like this with my CD collection. Two 400-disc Sony
carousels, both about half full. It's
In a message dated 12/1/2005 6:31:38 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did it strike again? :)
Raw is comparable to transparency film in that very little interpretation is
done to what could be considered the first generation image. After that the
analogy between digital
Two great lenses on eBay:
7568098563 SMC Pentax 500/4.5
7568101696 Canon EF 80-200/2.8 L
Jim
www.jcolwell.ca
I understand perfectly what you're talking about. It's just that I believe
most view the analogy opposite of the way you're stating it. I did too for
a while.
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Why I Haven't Yet
In a message dated 12/1/2005 7:07:41 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I understand perfectly what you're talking about. It's just that I believe
most view the analogy opposite of the way you're stating it. I did too for
a while.
Tom C.
==
Okay. I see it the way I said.
Way to go, Bill.
Cheers,
Gautam
-Original Message-
From: Bill Owens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 2:24 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: I gave myself birthday gifts
Since I was laid up in the hospital on my birthday back in
October, I gave
Both of these were taken with the Meade CaptureView 3.2 MP binoculars.
As I suspected it was quite hard to get a shot in the low light without
introducing quite a bit of shake. But I tried. The aperture is fixed at
f/4.0.
These fall into the 'nothing to brag about photographically, but
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why I Haven't Yet Switched
Basically, it's hard to change the colors of print film after the print is
made.
Print film is more flexible than slide film or jpeg format, for both colour
compensation and exposure latitude.
On Dec 2, 2005, at 9:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I foresee a future where one has to argue with one's camera.
I can just imagine it... the Pentax Clippy.
It looks like you're trying to take a photo of a brick wall. Shall
I make you want to beat your head against it instead?
- Dave
On Dec 2, 2005, at 1:13 AM, Brian Dunn wrote:
Does anyone spot meter any more?
Yes but not so often with 35mm.
I want a digi with a centre-weighted match-needle meter and no LCD :)
- Dave
On Dec 2, 2005, at 4:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The srbg and numbers is a profile for your specific monitor.
Probably a
default one if you have never run Adobe Gamma.
I'd say it's more likely to be:
sRGB IEC61966-2.1
Which is more commonly known as sRGB :)
- Dave
On Dec 2, 2005, at 3:36 AM, Pål Jensen wrote:
Too good to be true it seems. Amazon refuse to ship it
internationally and B+H wants $200 in shipping costs!
What does your local distributor charge?
About this time last year I jokingly asked for a quote for the
Minolta Multi Pro. The joke
On Dec 2, 2005, at 5:21 AM, Pål Jensen wrote:
They certainly are reputable and I have dealt with them before but
that was over 10 years ago. Does anyone know if they still insist
that you fax a copy of your credit card to them before they accept
the order? It is an incredible hassle as I
On Dec 2, 2005, at 1:04 AM, Christian wrote:
My feelings exactly. Now that it's UNIX, I'd like to have one too.
Careful... I already have one but I want two more.
- Dave
On 1 Dec 2005 at 18:39, Jack Davis wrote:
Can't pass up this opportunity come out and reveal the actual
physical repulsion I experienced each time I see a Velvia print
attempting to depict an element of the natural world.
Now, in a PS world of hue and tone sliders, I long for the limits
Thnaks, Dave.
I will pass your information on.
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 1. december 2005 08:57
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Back Focus!
Jens
I have never had a problem with
Glen wrote:
At 12:00 AM 12/1/2005, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Ann Sanfedele Subject: srbg to Adobe
RGB ?
The stock stuff I submit has to be Adobe RGB - am
I screwed? or is there
a way I can take that tif and translate it into
Adobe RGB. I have a
Tom C wrote:
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll continue to shoot jpgs, too - hey, Cotty,
this is an area we sure do agree on.
I can shoot raw, but I can't get enough images on
a card - and I have to take time
to run it through a coverter to tif and it takes
too much room on my
keith_w wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/1/2005 9:16:46 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Google offers Picasa at www.picasa.com. This is free software and is
a good inexpensive way to see what this type of software can do to
help you out.
===
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ann said:
someone said earlier on the list that if you
nailed the shot there was essentially no
difference.
That's true if the subject of your shot doesn't demand an extended range.
However, if you're working with bright highlights and deep shadows, you can
In a message dated 12/1/2005 8:06:09 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Basically, it's hard to change the colors of print film after the print is
made.
Print film is more flexible than slide film or jpeg format, for both colour
compensation and exposure latitude. Camera RAW
Tom,
Barring the red streak across the face I rather like the
first one. I like it even with the streak though.
Cheers,
Gautam
-Original Message-
From: Tom C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 7:22 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - Two from
201 - 235 of 235 matches
Mail list logo
