The cherry on the top of a raft of new Olympus products today is the
new E-330 (to be known in North America as the 'Olympus EVOLT E-330').
The E-330 has a similar appearance to the E-300 (although slightly
narrower) and inherits many improvements seen on the E-500, however it
has one major new
Please read E330 announcment at dpreview... maybe DL2 is about the same?
2006/1/26, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Op Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:49:09 +0100 schreef Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I remember a rumor that the first Pentax DSLR was going to
Ok, let's do it bridge camera way.
One embedded lens, like Olympus IS serie but still SLR.
2006/1/26, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Naahh... Point and Shoot cameras are already very small. And the zoom lenses
are quite good. Noone would wnat to change lenes on a small DSLR. The Ds is
already
Hush, don't let the cat out of the bag. Some of us are filling our boots
very nicely at the moment.
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: P645D
Right now prices of
Op Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:16:17 +0100 schreef Thibouille
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Please read E330 announcment at dpreview... maybe DL2 is about the same?
I saw it, but honestly, long after I posted :o) Seems Olympus is smart,
and gives customers what they want :/ If the date on the leaked
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be interesting to
hear other people's preferences.
Counting exposures made in 2005, my most used lens was the D-FA
16-45/4 zoom. With a Sigma 70-200 as a good number 2. Primes in the
focal range covered by the 16-45 (20, 31 and 50mm)
1 - DA 16-45/4
2 - Sigma EX 70-200/2.8
3 - FA 50/1.4
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 9:44 AM
Subject: Which lens do you use most?
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be
1/ DA 18-55 (do not own the pricey 16-45)
2/ FA 50/1.4
3/ F 28/2.8
2006/1/26, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1 - DA 16-45/4
2 - Sigma EX 70-200/2.8
3 - FA 50/1.4
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, January 26,
From: Margus Männik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/01/26 Thu AM 01:31:53 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: *ist DL2
Hi,
Am I the only one, who have got tired of those low-end 6MPix Pentaxes?
New body (hah), same sensor, nothing really new...again and again...
But what
In fact, I'd really like a cheap Pentax 645.
But prices are usually still a bit hard for me.
I don't even think about 67.
I'd really like one though ...
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
I'm still a real Primes kind og guy. I tried using my old A24-50mm but didn't
like the dark finder and limitations in low light, so I decided not to buy a
16-45mm...
1. FA50 1.4
2. A20 2.8
3. DA14 2.8 or A135 1.8
From being the most used lens on film the A85 sees little use now. Too bad it
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/01/26 Thu AM 01:42:06 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Australia Day
On 1/26/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
Wrom: YOQKEDOTWFAOBUZXUWLSZLKBRNVWWCUFPEGAUTFJMVRE
What is/are a pair of
fra: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Margus Männik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/01/26 Thu AM 01:31:53 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: *ist DL2
Hi,
Am I the only one, who have got tired of those low-end 6MPix Pentaxes?
New body (hah), same sensor, nothing
1. Tokina ATX PRO II 28-70/2.6-2.8
my first and still the most used K-mount lens.
2. Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
(mostly for its 150-300 range -mostly head and shoulders shots
from a distance, at concerts, events, etc.).
I started using Tokina 19-35/3.5-4.5 much more often
(especially for
Nice photos and it was easy to find where they were taken.
If you have Google Earth click on Google Earth bridge test on this page
and I hope it will take you there.
http://members.shaw.ca/hargravep/test.htm
More in Google Earth message
Powell
A couple of shots taken a few days ago on my
With my MZ-5n, the lens most used was the FA 28-105
3.2-4.5. I find it to have a very convenient range and
I wish Pentax offered a 18-70 for digital.
Then, in Novemeber came the Ds, along with a 18-55,
this one from a PDMLer. But, to my surprise, I find
myself using a lot the FA35/2, which I like
From: Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
To make both digicam and macro users happy. It seems no live preview is a
showstopper for lots of digicam/prosumer users. If Pentax is smart, it
doesn't argue the point, but delivers what potential customers want. As
for macro: weren't
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/01/26 Thu AM 08:44:13 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Which lens do you use most?
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be interesting to
hear other people's preferences.
Counting exposures made in 2005, my
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/01/26 Thu AM 09:12:59 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: *ist DL2
fra: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Margus Männik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/01/26 Thu AM 01:31:53 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re:
Op Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:44:13 +0100 schreef Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be interesting to
hear other people's preferences.
Counting exposures made in 2005, my most used lens was the D-FA 16-45/4
zoom. With a Sigma 70-200 as a good
Op Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:02:00 +0100 schreef mike wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
To make both digicam and macro users happy. It seems no live preview is
a
showstopper for lots of digicam/prosumer users. If Pentax is smart, it
doesn't argue the
On 1/26/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's the girls who have the budgies, mate.
Bob
Thanks for putting that image in my head Bob.
You haven't seen Priscilla, Queen of the desert?
Yeah, but those aren't girls Mike :-)
But through the horrors of the Internet I've seen
Well spotted Powell - and if you swing around to the right from the top end
of the bridge, you can see where I live! There is a yellow roofed building,
quite large, then a red-roofed smaller one: I live in the grey-roofed one
next to it.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Rob Studdert wrote:
They may well be able to spit out a sensor in short time, the question is will
it be as good and as polished as those produced by companies who have been
optimising similar technologies for decades, I suspect not.
I am with Rob on that, common sense
Since I've only used my D this last year I would say
1. DA16-45/4
2. FA35/2
3. F70-210/4-5.6
/Paul
Ursprungligt meddelande
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Jan 26, 2006 9:44:13 AM
Till: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Ärende: Which lens do you use most?
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey,
1) FA 31f1.8
2) DA 16-45 f4
3) FA 50 f1.4 or FA 100 f2.8 (it's a close call.)
Dave
On 1/26/06, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be interesting to
hear other people's preferences.
Counting exposures made in 2005, my most used lens was
While looking at John Coyle's images from Brisbane I thought it would be
fun to see if I could find where they were taken.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4061003
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4061007
It only took a few minutes and from half way round the world I was
Very nice John. I particularly like the shot of the bridge.
Dave
On 1/26/06, John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple of shots taken a few days ago on my morning walk - comments
welcome.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4061003
The link works fine for me Powell (after I updated to the latest
version of Google Earth).
On 1/26/06, Powell Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While looking at John Coyle's images from Brisbane I thought it would be
fun to see if I could find where they were taken.
2005 was the year I returned to primes and left the zooms at home. I got
better contrast, colour saturation and resolution. And more exercise! But
I think I'll stick with genuine Pentax lenses in future... The 28mm F2.8
Pentax-A is my favourite at the moment. If you take a look on eBay
Hey my street has gone higher res!
Now I can see the buildings on my property. Added a link on the test page.
http://members.shaw.ca/hargravep/test.htm
The red roof is my house.
Powell
While looking at John Coyle's images from Brisbane I thought it would be
fun to see if I could find where
At 09:44 26/01/2006, you wrote:
In descending order of use, it would be
1) My eyes' crystalline lenses
2) FA 100/2.8 macro
3) FA 28/2.8 AL
4) F 100-300/4.5-5.6
Yves
--
Yves Caudano, Namur, Belgium
Photography website: http://www.yvescaudano.be
Looks like a nice place to live. Right across the road from the river.
Powell
Well spotted Powell - and if you swing around to the right from the top end
of the bridge, you can see where I live! There is a yellow roofed building,
quite large, then a red-roofed smaller one: I live in the
For 99% of my shots I use 77ltd. Back in film days my favorite was the
135/2.8 so it figures. If I have to go wider, I use Sigma EX 20/1.8. If I
have to get closer I use Sigma EX 180/3.5 macro. 43ltd does nothing for
me. I tried 28/2.8 AL but got a weird feeling in the stomach every time I
Hi all,
The camera appears to be true. No mention of a (live) preview.
See http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/dslr/2006/01/26/3087.html.
--
Regards, Lucas
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:50:10 -, Kostas Kavoussanakis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Rob Studdert wrote:
They may well be able to spit out a sensor in short time, the question
is will
it be as good and as polished as those produced by companies who have
been
optimising
Absolutely lovely, especially the view East. Superb picture.
John
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 07:31:36 -, John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
A couple of shots taken a few days ago on my morning walk - comments
welcome.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4061003
I'm not going to count, but I would guess my most used glass was the
same lens -- the DA 16-45. Other big users would include the FA 50/1.4,
the FA 35/2, and the DA 50-200.
On Jan 26, 2006, at 3:44 AM, Jostein wrote:
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be interesting to
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be interesting to
hear other people's preferences.
Counting exposures made in 2005, my most used lens was the D-FA
16-45/4 zoom. With a Sigma 70-200 as a good number 2. Primes in the
focal range covered by the 16-45 (20, 31 and
How fitting! :-)
The hi-res pictures of Oslo is taken just when Yann Arthus-Bertrands
Earth from above was exhibited outside the town hall.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Powell Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 10:58 AM
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/01/26 Thu AM 11:44:23 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Google Earth photo links
How fitting! :-)
The hi-res pictures of Oslo is taken just when Yann Arthus-Bertrands
Earth from above was exhibited outside the town hall.
Always the mid-range focal lengths.
for both digital and film
Either one of : A35/2, K30/2.8
or
one of : FA50/1.4, A50/1.4
Collin
and a link;
http://www.oksne.net/temp/YAB-EarthFromAbove.zip
Just took me a couple of minutes to figure out how...:-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: Google Earth photo
DA 16-45 is probably first, but FA 35/2 must be a close second. FA
50/1.4 would be next, followed by DA 50-200, K85/1.8 and A 400/5.6.
On Jan 26, 2006, at 3:44 AM, Jostein wrote:
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be interesting to
hear other people's preferences.
I didn't actually count either. But I've spent some time attaching
information about lens ID to my ThumbsPlus archive, so doing a search
was easy. :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 12:15
Great light, nice pics.
Paul
On Jan 26, 2006, at 4:17 AM, Powell Hargrave wrote:
Nice photos and it was easy to find where they were taken.
If you have Google Earth click on Google Earth bridge test on this
page
and I hope it will take you there.
http://members.shaw.ca/hargravep/test.htm
Hi!
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/01/26 Thu AM 08:44:13 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Which lens do you use most?
Gang,
Counting exposures made in 2005, my most used lens was the D-FA
16-45/4 zoom. With a Sigma 70-200 as a good number 2. Primes in the
On 1/26/06, Powell Hargrave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any one with suggestions of easy ways to add Google Earth .kmz link files
to photos?
Try this QTVR pano with hotspot link (~630k)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Pano%20Head%20Test_003.mov
http://tinyurl.com/a3zm6
Dave
On 1/26/06, Peter Loveday [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Went to an auction a couple of days ago (deceased estate stuff), with the
intention of buying a Coffee machine and Ladder (both of which I did).
Picked up a mixed lot of camera and other gear, including:
MX Body
M 50/1.7 Lens
Jostein wrote:
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be interesting to
hear other people's preferences.
Counting exposures made in 2005, my most used lens was the D-FA
16-45/4 zoom. With a Sigma 70-200 as a good number 2. Primes in the
focal range covered by the 16-45
On 1/26/06, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be interesting to
hear other people's preferences.
snip
Overall, since I think I use my Leica more than my other cameras
(sorry, Pentaxians), my most used lens is the 40mm Summicron C.
After
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/01/26 Thu PM 01:34:45 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Which lens do you use most?
On 1/26/06, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be interesting to
hear other
Pentax FA645 33-55/4,5.
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 9:44 AM
Subject: Which lens do you use most?
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be interesting to
hear other
1. Sigma 50mm f/2.8 Macro
2. Pentax FA 50/1.4
3. Sigma 28-105 f/2.8
I just got the Pentax 50/1.4 and it is fast becoming my favorite
lens; the Sigma 28-105 was on my camera (istD) for about a year, but
AF was very slow in low light, and it's a lot of glass.
On Jan 26, 2006, at 3:44 AM,
1) FA28-70/4
2) SMC-F70-210
3) FA18-55
4) Kiron 105/2,8 Macro - just replaced with a FA100/2.8 Macro
dk
On 1/26/06, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be interesting to
hear other people's preferences.
Counting exposures made in
Nice light on the first one ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: John Coyle
A couple of shots taken a few days ago on my morning walk - comments
welcome.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4061003
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4061007
On 1/26/06, Peter Loveday [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Went to an auction a couple of days ago (deceased estate stuff), with t
...
MX Body
M 50/1.7 Lens
Takumar Bayonet 28/2.8 Lens
Kodak Retinette 1A
Jelco V-8III 8mm movie camera
3 Flash guns; one hammerhead style
On 26 Jan 2006 at 9:44, Jostein wrote:
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be interesting to
hear other people's preferences.
Counting exposures made in 2005, my most used lens was the D-FA
16-45/4 zoom. With a Sigma 70-200 as a good number 2. Primes in the
focal
John Coyle wrote:
A couple of shots taken a few days ago on my morning walk - comments
welcome.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4061003
Nice shot. I love the warm glow and the threatening clouds.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4061007
Meh, doesn't really do
Jostein wrote:
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be interesting to
hear other people's preferences.
Counting exposures made in 2005, my most used lens was the D-FA 16-45/4
zoom. With a Sigma 70-200 as a good number 2. Primes in the focal range
covered by the 16-45
M28/3.5
M50/1.4
M75-150/4
not counting Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar on my digicam...
Bedo.
Well, sorry for being sceptical, but this is not
an official site. I am not sure about that site,
but it might be yellow press as well (which bought the sensational
pdf floating around).
Pentax site in Japan (as well as in UK, US) is silent.
Igor
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 02:47:47 -0800
Lucas Rijnders
On 1/25/06, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/4609/display/4849127
This is the first time I have encountered the right lighting to try
this. Suggestions for how to do it better are welcome.
Thanks,
GREAT shot, Joe. The light's perfect, so's the
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Why:
As for macro: weren't you the one lying in the mud to photograph
birds?
A preview on a flip-screen might make life easier for you :o)
honestly, no. Part of lying on the ground is stalking the birds; don't
want to frighten them off. Besides, half the fun
mike wilson wrote:
From: Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
To make both digicam and macro users happy. It seems no live preview is a
showstopper for lots of digicam/prosumer users. If Pentax is smart, it
doesn't argue the point, but delivers what potential customers want. As
for
German Pentax site appears to have the announcement:
http://www.pentax.de/_de/photo/news/index.php?photonewsgruppe=news_id=142
Igor
Op Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:03:45 +0100 schreef Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, sorry for being sceptical, but this is not
I don't mind, I said 'appears to be true' on purpose :o)
an official site. I am not sure about that site,
but it might be yellow press as well (which bought the
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but is there any way a person can
buy the FA 200mm/2.8? BH has been listing it for weeks as back
ordered. Last time I checked the Pentax US web site it looks like
they're still making it. Is this lens going to be replaced by
another one coming from
John,
Beautiful light in both scenes. The serene side light renders an
especially nice semi-silhouette bridge structure.
Thanks for the peek.
Jack
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
1. FA28-105 f4-5.6
2. FA20-35 f4 used with evermore frequency on *istD
3. Everything else
Larry in Dallas
Igor Roshchin wrote on 26.01.06 16:11:
German Pentax site appears to have the announcement:
http://www.pentax.de/_de/photo/news/index.php?photonewsgruppe=news_id=142
From specifications it seems it will have a kind of preview on LCD by just
pulling preview lever:
Elektronische Bildvorschau
From: Yves Caudano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/01/26 Thu AM 10:34:53 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Which lens do you use most?
At 09:44 26/01/2006, you wrote:
In descending order of use, it would be
1) My eyes' crystalline lenses
Time to see the optician. Unless
Seems that there is an undocumented way for some windows systems to run code
embedded in images.
This interview transcript provides the information, if you can wade through it.
http://www.grc.com/sn/SN-023.pdf
A utility for checking your system.
http://www.grc.com/wmf/wmf.htm
mike
On 1/26/06, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 26, 2006, at 3:42 AM, Perry Pellechia wrote:
Is the tree making an A shaped shadow onto the mist in
the center?
Yes, the distant tree is casting the shadow. I found it quite
interesting :)
I find it interesting too. I would love
On 26 Jan 2006 at 10:51, John Forbes wrote:
Samsung is one of the world's biggest chip makers, so I would not expect
them to have too much difficulty producing a larger sensor of similar
quality. Sensor chips are becoming a commodity now; the technology is old
hat.
I believe it's
Wonderful image Joe! It's almost otherworldly. Nice composition (wish the
OoF foreground plant in lower right was absent).
Tom C.
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Glowing Sahuaros
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006
More or less?
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: *ist DL2
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:59:40 -0600
- Original Message - From: Tom C
Subject: Re: *ist DL2
Woohoo! Even less of what I want.
No mice here :-)
Dave
On 1/26/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems that there is an undocumented way for some windows systems to run code
embedded in images.
This interview transcript provides the information, if you can wade through
it.
http://www.grc.com/sn/SN-023.pdf
A
I presume you meant the DA16-45/4.
For me, it's a trade-off between the FA20-35/4 and FA35/2 for most
used lens, with near equal time given to the FA50/1.4 right after that.
Godfrey
On Jan 26, 2006, at 12:44 AM, Jostein wrote:
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be
Well done Joe. Other than working this scene for variations, (isolate single
plants, landscape orientation, parts of a single plant etc.) I have no
suggestions.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday,
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wanna play!
One thing you can do is to download an application called World Wind
from NASA. It's a lot slower than the Google thing, but it's based on
the same set of satellite photos.
Jostein
On the MX or K1000, in order of preference:
M50/1.7
M35/2.8
M85/2
On 1/26/06, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be interesting to
hear other people's preferences.
Counting exposures made in 2005, my most used lens was the D-FA
Hi,
No, 'cause I still use film. There are still no Pentax digital body that
fully fulfills my requirements of quality.
BR, Margus
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Is the quality of your photographs being compromised by these low
end cameras?
Godfrey
devil's advocate
Hi,
there's a BIG difference - Pentax film bodies are more or less
technically perfect, there's actually nothing missing, both from quality
and handling. I am very satisfied with my Z-1p.
Digitals are the whole different story - quality of current 6MPix chip
used in Pentaxes do not satisfy me.
Before I got the DA12-24, pretty much it was certainly the DA16-45, but
now the DA12-24 hardly ever leaves the camera.
Jostein wrote:
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be interesting to
hear other people's preferences.
Counting exposures made in 2005, my most used
Hi,
1. FA28-105 PZ ('cause I'm lazy)
2. FA 50/1.4 ('cause I want to see it)
3. FA 135/2.8 ('cause I like this focal lenght)
BR, Margus
Jostein wrote:
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be interesting to
hear other people's preferences.
Counting exposures made in
In a message dated 1/25/2006 11:33:22 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A couple of shots taken a few days ago on my morning walk - comments
welcome.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4061003
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4061007
John Coyle
In what ways do you find the D200 superior to the Pentax cameras? I'd be
interested in your comments about weight, size, ergonomics, as well as any
other thoughts you may have.
Thanks!
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Margus Männik
Lately reviewed Nikon
D200 blows the whole *ist D family
On 1/25/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. There are some tiny
Optios available as well. So the digital equivalent of that 110 is
already available.
Exactly.
The Optio S series is pretty damned small; fits in a can of Altoids
and all. Much smaller would present ergonomic problems
I presume you meant the DA16-45/4.
For me, it's a trade-off between the FA20-35/4 and FA35/2 for most
used lens, with near equal time given to the FA50/1.4 right after
that. All with the DS body.
Godfrey
On Jan 26, 2006, at 12:44 AM, Jostein wrote:
Gang,
This is not really meant as a
In a message dated 1/25/2006 11:38:38 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don't know that it could have been done better, Joe, that's one great shot.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
David Savage wrote:
On 1/26/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's the girls who have the budgies, mate.
Bob
Thanks for putting that image in my head Bob.
You haven't seen Priscilla, Queen of the desert?
Yeah, but those aren't girls Mike :-)
But through the horrors of the
Bob Sullivan wrote:
That's a satisfying family scene Paul. I envy you... Bob S.
On 1/25/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pooh wants in. FA 50/1.4 on the *istD. f2.4 @ 1/20th. Handheld of
course.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4058489size=lg
Except...what I've
Having played with one:
MF lens compatibility (Even matrix meters with AI lenses, no stop-down
metering, and does proper Aperture priority). this was the biggest
weakness of the D100, D70(s) and D50 and Nikon has fixed it in spades
(the D200 is one of the few bodies Nikon ever made that
AF-C will disable trap focus. But, now that the original post has been
cut out of the thread I forget who
posted this so I don't care any more.
Perry Pellechia wrote:
I do not have a DS, but perhaps there is a custom function setting
that is controlling the difference in behavior?
On
All FA lenses are supposed to be discontinued to be replaced with D-Fa
or DA equivalents. Soon is a matter of definition.
Micah Kleit wrote:
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but is there any way a person can
buy the FA 200mm/2.8? BH has been listing it for weeks as back
ordered. Last
Since buying the DA 16-45 F4 last spring, it rarley comes of the istD. The
28-105 is
allways on the PZ-
1. My most used prime would be the Sigma 300 f 4
Dave Brooks
Jostein wrote:
Gang,
This is not really meant as a survey, but it would be
This is kind of an odd question in a way, because the answer(s) to it will
lead one to what conclusion(s)? Off the top of my head, I use whatever lens
is appropriate to the subject, circumstances, and composition I'm attempting
to capture. :-)
I've been favoring the FA 31/1.8 LTD quite
Marvin the Mountie Always Gets His Pentax!
frank theriault wrote:
On 1/23/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got:
'For the Cotty you don't yet know'
http://www.thesurrealist.co.uk/slogan.cgi
Don't Just Book It, Knarf It! (I added the exclamation point, 'cause
I think it looks
Cute, but I can tell they're your kids...
frank theriault wrote:
On 1/23/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That movement is weird ;-)) but, in and of itself, doesn't make Tom Cruise
weird, unless, of course, he has an association with the movement. Does he?
Like you,
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
