Thanks, Adam. I had to shoot the snow while we have
it; it's supposed to be 55F/13C by the end of the
week. Grey slush isn't nearly so pretty!
Showing my ignorance, which metropolis is nicknamed
Hawgtown?
Rick
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great shot. Love the snow.
I'm missing
Tim Sherburne wrote:
I had the same question, too...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/umdiaumafoto/24763474/in/photostream/
t
On 2/13/06 10:26, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Does anyone still have the URL?
Thanks -- bookmarked.
It is perhaps true, that more wxposure reduces the noice - I never thought
of that - didn't know. Speaking of which, makes mem remamber, that I made a
flash shot last week - by mistake at 3200 ASA - I had forgotten to reset the
ISO. I was actually surpprised, that the noise wasn't all that bad.
Amazing. You are the most consistent in producing great shots. This
one goes down so well with the other flora shots you have shared in
the past.
Gaurav
On 2/9/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taken on one of the walks some time back.
Pentax *istD, Tokina AT-X SD AF 400/5.6, Handheld
Super picture, Boris. Really lovely.
John
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:21:25 -, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dave,
I bought 43 Ltd and 77 Ltd from fellow PDMLer last year... They are
quite *amazing*. Suffices to say, I've put my FA 50/1.7 to the shelf
and haven't really touched
In re this photo
http://www.flickr.com/photos/umdiaumafoto/24763474/in/photostream/
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Thank Tim (and Dario).
ERN:
For those familiar with the Leica CL and Minolta CLE, the camera is
instantly recognizable in that photograph. The size, shape, layout of
the shutter
Buy a second-hand 31mm on Ebay. The difference will then be much less.
You'll always have that nagging feeling if you buy the 28!
John
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:56:14 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I knew someone would tell me that, Jack.g
I may have been thinking of another one of the Ltd
[Original Message]
From: Ann Sanfedele
great shot, but that sign sticking out of the top of her
head is killing me.
better?
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/blizzardtoday.jpg
Seems to be. But I'd have to compare it to the original.
Marnie aka Doe
Exposure looks pretty good to me. A decent scene, but it doesn't
really grab me.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, February 13, 2006, 7:14:36 AM, you wrote:
RW Another in my On My Way to Work series.
RW We had a bit of snow here in the northeastern US, and
RW I tarried on my walk to work to
Hi John,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:11:45 +, John Whittingham wrote:
Is the FA 135 f/2.8 not a good performer on DSLRs, I can't figure why they
would discontinue that particular lens yet keep the 50mm f/1.4 35nn f/2.
I doubt lens properties play a role in that decision, more likely
it is
On Feb 13, 2006, at 11:28 AM, E.R.N. Reed wrote:
It also contains BH's phone number ... that can be REALLY useful.
The BH phone number is on speed dial in my cell phone... !!!
Godfrey
Toronto, Land of Smog and no snow.
-Adam
Rick Womer wrote:
Thanks, Adam. I had to shoot the snow while we have
it; it's supposed to be 55F/13C by the end of the
week. Grey slush isn't nearly so pretty!
Showing my ignorance, which metropolis is nicknamed
Hawgtown?
Rick
--- Adam Maas
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
On 2/13/06, E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Y'know, this poor thread has been nothing but a minefield almost still
it started.
Meanwhile, I am still a bit amazed that anyone could make out so clearly
what the camera in the picture is. I
I think this probably is the digital K1000 - bit of a let down. Can't
wait for Photokina 2008 to arrive!! Nikon and Pentax must be on full
alert
Regards
Peter
On 2/1/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax seems to play hard. Will it be digital K1000?
Like Godfrey said, it looks a little too cyan on my monitor as well.
Why did you make the small version into a 900 KB file? :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 10:47 PM
Subject: PESO: Panorama
On Feb 13, 2006, at 2:35 PM, E.R.N. Reed wrote:
I could see the shutter speed dial (and so knew it wasn't a CL) but
am not familiar enough with the M Leicas to have ruled out one of
them. At least, that's the way I recall it, but now I don't have
the link, so can't see it. I guess I was
On Feb 13, 2006, at 11:43 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
It is perhaps true, that more exposure reduces the noice - I never
thought
of that - didn't know.
Rather, underexposure increases noise. Your shots are slightly
underexposed.
Overexposing in order to reduce noise, will still require even
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:21:25 -, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dave,
I bought 43 Ltd and 77 Ltd from fellow PDMLer last year... They are
quite *amazing*. Suffices to say, I've put my FA 50/1.7 to the shelf
and haven't really
Ric,
I like it. Contains a number of very nice elements.
Now having said that, it's very blue/purple.
Do you have a Velvia plug-in? ;-))
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exposure looks pretty good to me. A decent scene, but it doesn't
really grab me.
--
Best regards,
Just had a look at Camera Canada.com, a store in London Ontario i have dealt
with before.
Of 3 pages of Pentax lenses, two are available, two are Hot Items and the
rest not in
stock.
Dave
On Feb 13, 2006, at 12:11 AM, John Whittingham wrote:
Is the
HEY!
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like it. Contains a number of very nice elements.
Now having said that, it's very blue/purple.
Do you have a Velvia plug-in? ;-))
RW http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4119836
That's not really a good precedent - the tree is on private property,
and you need to be on private property to take the photograph. Not
only that - although they restrict commercial use, they explicitly
allow photography for personal use.
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 11:55:09PM -0800, Shel
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Not really ... I can still see the sign and the pole. What did you do?
Shel
I lighted the pole - on my screen, it is very faint - I
didn't want to remove it
all together... is it possible what you are seeing as the
pole is the tree?
ann
[Original Message]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Original Message]
From: Ann Sanfedele
great shot, but that sign sticking out of the top of her
head is killing me.
better?
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/blizzardtoday.jpg
Seems to be. But I'd have to compare it to the original.
Marnie aka
Love some of the motion blurs. Good stuff, Lasse.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Lasse Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
Friday night I shot a concert by young Danish jazz band Jazz Kamikaze who
played the Mariehamn Jazz, Roots Blues Festival 2006.
I would guess that's their fault. BH has plenty of Pentax lenses available.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just had a look at Camera Canada.com, a store in London Ontario i have dealt
with before.
Of 3 pages of Pentax lenses, two are
No, it is the pole and the sign I see. I put the pic in Photoshop and
blew it up 200% to be sure. I then went and removed the pole and sign just
to see how difficult it would be. The pole and the sign are quite
noticeable to me. If you'd like a copy of what I did so you can see for
yourself,
Oh, hi Tom. I wondered if you were watching. ;=]]
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HEY!
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like it. Contains a number of very nice elements.
Now having said that, it's very blue/purple.
Do you have a Velvia plug-in? ;-))
RW
In a message dated 2/13/2006 12:50:11 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
here is the original
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/blizzardpaw.jpg
ann
off to walk in the snow to the store
-
Yup, big difference. Thought you had lightened the pole, but wasn't sure.
Now it lays flat
Yeah, I agree, Godfrey.
You are right about the exposure too. I just checked the EXIF.
They are not spot on. Some are over exposed +0.70, compensating for the
backlit scenery. That's OK.
But others are under exposed by -0.3 (the ones with two kids). This is
obvioulsy a mistake - I probably have
Some nice shots here. You must be taking motion blur
lessons from Frank!
Rick
--- Lasse Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Friday night I shot a concert by young Danish jazz
band Jazz Kamikaze who
played the Mariehamn Jazz, Roots Blues Festival
2006.
They were really, I mean
Great stuff. They are saving up money for something. What?
BTW: Does this camera support other than A like the D does?
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Peter Fairweather [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 13. februar 2006 21:09
Til:
On 2/13/06, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another in my On My Way to Work series.
We had a bit of snow here in the northeastern US, and
I tarried on my walk to work to shoot a little.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4119836
Optio 33L, +0.7 exposure comp., slightly
On 2006-02-13, at 23:05, Jens Bladt wrote:
BTW: Does this camera support other than A like the D does?
Regards
Yes, no problems with aperture set to position other than A, just
use DOF to set right exposure in M mode.
--
Best regards
Sylwek
On 2/13/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you have the composition right on. Nicely balanced.
I agree with Tom (see, Tom, I can say it: I agree with Tom! LOL).
The sunset part of it is, well, a sunset, but nothing spectacular, but
it does make the sky more interesting than a washed
On 2/12/06, Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. on 1st ave and st marks place today
blizzard are us
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/blizzardpaw.jpg
Great shot, Ann, but I'll agree with Paul, that it might look even
better in BW. Still, I like it as is.
Staying warm and cozy under
From: frank theriault
I agree with Tom (see, Tom, I can say it: I agree with Tom! LOL).
And I agree with Uncle Frank! (hugs) :-)
Tom C.
Frank, I'm really glad that you liked it, but more glad than you Tom are
friends again ; ) LOL
Regarding the vantage point well, my english is not that good (I mean, for
the vantage part) so I must confess I checked my dictonary and... is eye
level the right answer? I took this in the shore
Here in Philly proper, about a foot (30 cm). In the
'burbs, 1.5 to 2 ft.
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, did you say a bit of snow? Did you guys miss
the three feet
that pounded NYC and much of the eastern seabord?
__
Do
Typo:
...but more glad than you Tom are friends again ; ) LOL
should've read:
...but more glad THAT you Tom are friends again ; ) LOL
From: Fernando Terrazzino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Toronto sunset
Date: Mon,
On 2/12/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tajken approximately 1 1/2 hours ago. Tokina 500/8 mirror lens.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4118417
Tom C.
Stunning!!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Franks alot! :-)
Tom C.
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Idaho Snow Moon
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:46:51 -0500
On 2/12/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tajken approximately 1 1/2 hours ago. Tokina
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:46:51 -, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/12/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tajken approximately 1 1/2 hours ago. Tokina 500/8 mirror lens.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4118417
Tom C.
Stunning!!
Yeah, not bad. :-)
Wouldn't
John Forbes wrote:
Yeah, not bad. :-)
Wouldn't have looked so good with the pocket Fuji!
Dear John... Thank you.
Taken approximately 1 1/2 hours ago. Tokina 500/8 mirror lens.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4118417
Tom C.
Frank did you have a problem with me I didn't have a problem with you.
What's this guy talking about? :-)
Tom C.
From: Fernando Terrazzino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Toronto sunset
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:41:54
Rick,
On my calibrated monitor, the image has an objectionable overall magenta
tint.
The posted image needs to be simplified, there's too much going on that
competes for my attention.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Frozen Pond
Jay,
from the posted image your combo sure looks like it's capable. The image
itself suffers from several issues - You cut off the birds legs, foreground
clutter being distracted in Seattle.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Jay Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Intro to
Every so often I see a claim in a lens description:
These scratches don't affect the quality of your photo.
What does one think when writing this type of statement?
That you don't see the scratch on the photos?
Even if a half of the lens area is covered by scratches you might
not see the
Cropping on the right would definitely help this image.
I would crop out the space immediately to the right of the benches.
The lines (of the horizon, shore line benches tree tops) converging on the
boat are the strongest aspect of this image.
I would also crop out the topmost part of the sky
Great, now I see a tree sticking out of the head of the foreground person!!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO: around the corner (revised for doug:) )
Doug Brewer wrote:
On Feb 12, 2006, at 3:29 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
In a message dated 2/13/2006 3:41:19 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Great, now I see a tree sticking out of the head of the foreground person!!
Kenneth Waller
=
This reminds me of the chair leg (or chair legs).
Don't think you can win, ann.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 2/13/2006 8:25:46 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, I can decide if cropping some on the right would help this one. Any
comments appreciated.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?topic_id=1481msg_id=00EUxjphoto_id=394086
5photo_sel_index=0
Pentax DS, DA
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
No, it is the pole and the sign I see. I put the pic in Photoshop and
blew it up 200% to be sure. I then went and removed the pole and sign just
to see how difficult it would be. The pole and the sign are quite
noticeable to me. If you'd like a copy of what I did so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/13/2006 12:50:11 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
here is the original
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/blizzardpaw.jpg
ann
off to walk in the snow to the store
-
Yup, big difference. Thought you had lightened the pole,
In a message dated 2/13/2006 3:50:15 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
writes:
Marnie aka Doe
:) though after Doug pointed it out it suddenly got much
larger and darker! vbg
ann
==
Hehehehe. Yup.
Marnie aka Doe
LOL
Now that I think it better, is more fun when you guys are killing each
other. Now, how was that thing with the copyright Tom? ; D
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Toronto sunset
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:12:56
frank theriault wrote:
On 2/12/06, Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. on 1st ave and st marks place today
blizzard are us
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/blizzardpaw.jpg
Great shot, Ann, but I'll agree with Paul, that it might look even
better in BW. Still, I like it as
Hi Lasse
Nice overall set, but the dragging the shutter technique did little for me.
I think I would have preferred the images had you set a shutter speed to get
just a touch of blur. Two of the pictures of the drummer 066 and 105 best
exemplify it.
Butch
I tend to like the way it is.
Thank you Marnie.
Not that boring.
Well, I was the bored one ; )
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Toronto sunset
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:45:55 EST
In a message dated 2/13/2006 8:25:46
LOL
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Idaho Snow Moon
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:50:01 -0700
Franks alot! :-)
Tom C.
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
In a message dated 2/13/2006 8:13:05 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Having a recent interest in wildlife subjects, I decided to pick up a
telephoto lens for my DSLR. I found a pretty nice copy of the
discontinued Tokina AT-X 400mm F5.6 on eBay. The lens is surprisingly
Hello Gaurav,
You are too kind. There are some great photographers on this list
that inspire me to try to do my best.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, February 13, 2006, 11:43:03 AM, you wrote:
GA Amazing. You are the most consistent in producing great shots. This
GA one goes down so well
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
If we all contributed about fifteen minutes we could make a decent start.
Really?
From what I've seen on this list, getting several people
involved would only extend the process almost indefinitely! 8-)
Keith McG
[Original Message]
From: Doug Brewer
On Feb 13,
On 13 Feb 2006 at 18:18, Jens Bladt wrote:
I do know that film used to be even worse. But that was yesterday. Talking
about the new high end Pentax DSLR is now!
Jens there are physical limits WRT noise minimization and we are nearly there
on the physical side, there will be new methods of
It's one of my favorite features
of the Canon EOS lenses with USM mount ... they call it full time
manual focus. No need to click the AF/MF switch in one shot AF mode
at all. It is by far and away the feature I missed the most when I
contemplate my switch from Canon to Pentax.
I'll
I doubt lens properties play a role in that decision, more likely
it is available stock of lenses as well as parts ...
Or perhaps the cost of metal bodied construction, do you think?
Regards,
John
John Whittingham
Technician
you can't be optimistic with a misty optic
-- Original
On 13 Feb 2006 at 14:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It may depend on how you hold your camera. I use the very large A*135 and
sometimes the A*85 on an *istD without a grip, and don't have any problems.
On the contrary, I support the lens with my left hand with the elbow
supported to my
Keith McGuinness wrote:
From what I've seen on this list, getting several people involved would
only extend the process almost indefinitely! 8-)
I strongly disagree :o)
From: Keith McGuinness [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: RECAPS
On 12 Feb 2006 at 0:40, Don Williams wrote:
After Godfrey set me right I made another set
of images -- like I did a week or so ago
(without making a silly mistake) when testing
a Macro Converter. This time I used the Sigma
50/2.8 EX Macro alone. The nearest flower was
110 mm from the
... since my last period of unemployment.
But that old monster has bit again.
So now come the choices -- what to part with.
First to go is ...
... wait ... I'll decide later in the week.
Got to let my head clear and make the right choices.
No sense in being rash.
Collin
last i checked , bg had 31mm silver or black, either @ $779 (US)
28mm seems to be $219,
what currency is your quote -- just curious? it cannot be CAD,
best,
mishka
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:09:54 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Troops
I'm now starting to toy with the
On 14 Feb 2006 at 11:09, pentax-discuss@pdml.net wrote:
And if you would like to see comparison images from most of the current
cameras
at high ISO see:
http://digitalcamera.impress.co.jp/06_02/auth/toku1/index_iso.htm
PS They are large files but do check out 1:1 comparison of the shots
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Great, now I see a tree sticking out of the head of the foreground person!!
Kenneth Waller
I'm not minding that tree - but that was what I suspected
Shel saw, instead of the
post Doug saw.
LOL!
Sorry Ken , I'm not replanting the tree :)
ann
- Original Message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/13/2006 3:50:15 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
writes:
Marnie aka Doe
:) though after Doug pointed it out it suddenly got much
larger and darker! vbg
ann
==
Hehehehe. Yup.
Marnie aka Doe
Well, I'm glad this isn't
now I've seen it all...
I listed a chalk drawing of mine... an impressionistic nude,
_ I was careful not to
call the thing bare naked lady ..
The listing is over in 2 hours... it has been there for
almost a week with no
problem... listed under art - subject matter nudes in the
search thing.
Igor,
Yes, but...
I don't think they make a 2% difference, or a .2% diference.
Only in the case of flare would I be concerned.
But I'm sure they knock the price down on used lenses.
Regards, Bob S.
On 2/13/06, Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every so often I see a claim in a lens
On 13 Feb 2006 at 18:41, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Igor,
Yes, but...
I don't think they make a 2% difference, or a .2% diference.
Only in the case of flare would I be concerned.
I think that the point is that it's not for others to determine how much
difference it will make to the buyer, surely
Bob - thanks for sending that -
that is really disgusting. ugh.
I just got censored on ebay oddly -
they covered up my gallery image of a pastel chalk nude. so
silly
ann
David Savage wrote:
You should have it framed and hang it on the wall then.
I'm serious :-)
Dave
On 2/13/06, Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have one
scarf I hardly ever
wear because I'm afraid I'll lose it and it was a present
from someone special.
ann
it is
Hi, Folks,
I'm doing some research on projector brightness. Not slide projectors,
rather projectors for vitual reality applications, but the questions I have
are relevant to both types. They probably sound pretty basic but anyway
please bear with me:
1. Does a projector lens with
Good lens work. You nailed the focus and exposure. The background isn't
ideal, but I could live with that. I might clone out the typography.
But the cutoff legs don't work for me. Nevertheless, a very good
effort.
Paul
On Feb 13, 2006, at 7:04 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated
Sorry to hear that. Been there, done that. It's no fun. Hope you find
new employment soon.
Paul
On Feb 13, 2006, at 7:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... since my last period of unemployment.
But that old monster has bit again.
So now come the choices -- what to part with.
First to go is ...
On 13 Feb 2006 at 19:53, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
and (ask frank if you don't believe me) there ain't no room
on the walls for anything else :)
Of course I can vouch for you too, little paint is visible between the book-
shelves and art-works :-)
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
On 13 Feb 2006 at 18:58, Yefei He wrote:
1. Does a projector lens with longer focal length give a larger image
or smaller, if the projector to screen distance remains the same and assume
both are able to focus on the screen at that distance? My guess is wide
angle
lens gives a larger
No one said you didn't know how. You kept saying you didn't see it. The
offer to show you the shot with/without the pole was based on that.
Sometimes when someone sees two images together the difference becomes
noticeable. No need to get defensive.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Ann
Sorry to hear about it.
Hopefully you can turn it into an opportunity. Don't do anything too
rash or quickly.
Godfrey
On Feb 13, 2006, at 4:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... since my last period of unemployment.
But that old monster has bit again.
So now come the choices -- what to part
Hello Jay,
Not sure which one you got, but mine has been wonderful. I have many
nice shots from it. Mine is labeled Tokina AT-X AF400 Close Focus
around the distance scale and then a red SD with a red stripe around
the hood.
The shot indicates yours is a nice lens. Have a great time with it.
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 13 Feb 2006 at 19:53, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
and (ask frank if you don't believe me) there ain't no room
on the walls for anything else :)
Of course I can vouch for you too, little paint is visible between the book-
shelves and art-works :-)
Cheers,
Rob
I will add my favorable comments about the shot. I like it un
cropped. I do agree with Rick that if you had the ship near the
center of the frame it would have been an even better photo.
Perry,
On 2/13/06, Fernando Terrazzino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I can decide if cropping some on the
Kenneth,
Looking at it with my calibrated monitor at home,
rather than my uncalibrated monitor at work, I see
what you mean about the tint.
Not sure how I would simplify it, though, apart from
cropping out everything but the branch--which loses
the atmosphere.
Rick
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL
On 12 Feb 2006 at 15:37, herb greenslade wrote:
Hi
Thanks for the link Robert.
No problems, some more perhaps?
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=17159777
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This one time, at band camp, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin,
Did the tether software fall over during the test? A friend of mine
rented the 39MP H2 for a shoot and had the software repeatedly crash
on him while shooting. It's not terribly stable.
No, it performed very well.
In a message dated 2/13/2006 4:41:38 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
writes:
they blocked out the gallery image! (but not, at least the
images in the listing itself.
ugh.
ann
--
A chalk drawing? Someone has a very good imagination to see a real nude in
that.
They
On 2/13/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank did you have a problem with me
Nope.
I didn't have a problem with you.
I didn't think you did.
What's this guy talking about? :-)
I think he's trying to start something. We'd better go whup his ass!
g
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/13/2006 4:41:38 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
writes:
they blocked out the gallery image! (but not, at least the
images in the listing itself.
ugh.
ann
--
A chalk drawing? Someone has a very good imagination to
This one time, at band camp, Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
funny thing, it started as a landscape and i switched it to
a nude
It begs the question, what did you use for a model?
Kind regards
Kevin
--
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty
Hey, I like it!
We only got about five inches. :( Was hoping for a foot or more.
On 2/13/06, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another in my On My Way to Work series.
We had a bit of snow here in the northeastern US, and
I tarried on my walk to work to shoot a little.
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
funny thing, it started as a landscape and i switched it to
a nude
It begs the question, what did you use for a model?
Kind regards
Kevin
--
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on
Hi!
... since my last period of unemployment.
But that old monster has bit again.
So now come the choices -- what to part with.
First to go is ...
... wait ... I'll decide later in the week.
Got to let my head clear and make the right choices.
No sense in being rash.
Darn...
Hope you'd
Collin,
It's been almost 17 years since my last period of unemployment. The
world is a different place!
At least we can live off my wife's income so I just need to make sure
I'm working again before I want to update the *istD.
Leon
http://www.bluering.org.au
1 - 100 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
