See my photos on the web at:
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060226223255
--
home http://roman.blakout.net/
Hey,
Would love to invite you to join googlegroup, share your DSLR
information, sample photos , useful tips on digital photography,
cameras, cleaning techniquest, whatever.
Please see groups website on:
http://groups.google.com/group/pentax-dslr
Thank you.
--
home
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Chimping really interrupts the flow of working with someone. Stopping to
examine the screen after every shot, or every few shots, can have a
deleterious effect on a photo session. But, I guess for some, that's the
new, modern way ...
Well, I don't
On 3/3/06, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A fringe benefit at my employer is an 8 week sabbatical every 10
years. I've been thinking of spending 3 weeks 'down under'. You
folks have convinced me it gets damned hot in Australia during your
summer, so I've been thinking of spring. And
It may be a good idea to set file associations so that Acrobat and not
Photoshop opens PDF files, then there would be no need to open Acrobat
first.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Gautam Sarup
The strangeness may be because perhaps you installed
Acrobat Reader and installed Photoshop after
Roman,
What's the point in doing that? PDML mostly deals with DSLR info already
(after beer, cars and the usual OT).
Besides PDML (for OT), Spotmatic group (for old stuff) and DPReview forum
(for digital), do we really need another group?
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Roman
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/03 Fri AM 01:34:14 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Advice on long glass for, photodoc on beachbirds
Put this in the FWIW dept -
About 10 years ago, I approached the camera shop in Indianapolis that
sells/rents Nikon
I spent a couple of weeks on the south island of New Zealand. I found
it both fascinating and beautiful. David's photographs are testimony to
its fabulous scenery. What's more, the people are delightful.
Paul
On Mar 2, 2006, at 11:31 PM, David Mann wrote:
On Mar 3, 2006, at 1:21 PM, Bob
I'd rather stay in just one group (=this). I don't have that much
time fooling around the net running after all different forums.
I have not written a lot lately here, but I am reading all of you
very carefully every morning (and along the day).
But there is always room for new things for those
Look at Tokina roadmap:
http://www.tokina.co.jp/news/tokina2006.jpg
It seems that there will be more than just DA 10-17 fisheye made in
cooperation with Tokina ;-) And we will see Tokina versions of DA 16-50/2,8
and 50-135/2,8 on 23 march during PIE 2006 in Japan! More info on
cooperation with
Hi Bob,
Others have made comments about various bits of Australia (and New
Zealand where they talk funny), and it's all true. The truth is that
Australia is so varied a place that 3 weeks is a short time to do it
justice. I've known people to spend 3 weeks in Tasmania (the little
island
Mike,
I've been known to take 20 shots and THEN have a quick peek to see if
the exposure is right and if I have the horizon straight. I have the
preview turned off on my ist D and only look occasionally.
I don't talk to myself while reviewing which is a major feature of
chimping - the only
Hi Pentaxians
I got the Tamron SP Soft Focus Potrait Lens 70-150mm 2.8 lately and would
like to get some opinions on how to use the soft focus feature. Are there
any recommended settings for the soft foucs ring setting and does anybody
have some sample portrait or landscape shots with this lens
Hi Jay
I like the foto and the bw conversion but would crop the unpleasant
background on the right. The hand looks somehow oversharpened to me compared
to the face.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Jay Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 8:19 AM
To:
Hi Roman and welcome from my side.
The first one is my favorite composition, really nice.
I use a monopod most of the time too ;-)
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Roman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 10:21 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Winter
Ain't that the truth? I spent a week in Sydney, Australia area alone
during August of 2001. I found so much to see and photograph i never
even thought of going elsewhere on that trip.
Godfrey
On Mar 3, 2006, at 3:43 AM, Leon Altoff wrote:
The truth is that Australia is so varied a place
Before I purchased my *ist DL I'd seached for Linux support for its
*.pef RAW files and found something called ' ufraw' . This program has
GUI - graphical user interface to change options and preview process of
image conversion. Command-line utility ' dcraw ' does not support Pentax
*.PEF
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Illinois Bill wrote:
http://www.stbaldricks.org/ShaveePhoto.asp?SolNumber=15332315
I'm selling my beard this year to my students.
It is good for the world as a whole to lose a beard. I will support
your cause.
Kostas
John and all,
Thanks for the replies. You raise lots of good questions. Being
based somewhere down south for a while would be desirable. I know we
have not planned enough time to see all the sights, but your
suggestions will make some highlights for us to start researching.
Regards, Bob S.
On
Thanks Leon,
Doing something like driving the Great Ocean Road sounds appealing.
Renting a car and driving to places are something we often do. Last
night, my wife pointed out that kangaroos were mentioned as a serious
driving hazzard at night in the wilderness.
Regards, Bob S.
On 3/3/06, Leon
On 3/3/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis, discombobulated, unleashed:
It is good for the world as a whole to lose a beard.
Mark!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 3/3/06, Roman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Would love to invite you to join googlegroup, share your DSLR
information, sample photos , useful tips on digital photography,
cameras, cleaning techniquest, whatever.
Please see groups website on:
http://groups.google.com/group/pentax-dslr
Thank
On 3/3/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/3/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis, discombobulated, unleashed:
It is good for the world as a whole to lose a beard.
Mark!
...time to lose the beard .
Dave
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Roman wrote:
Before I purchased my *ist DL I'd seached for Linux support for its
*.pef RAW files and found something called ' ufraw' . This program has
GUI - graphical user interface to change options and preview process
of image conversion. Command-line utility ' dcraw ' does not support
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Roman wrote:
Before I purchased my *ist DL I'd seached for Linux support for its *.pef RAW
files and found something called ' ufraw' . This program has GUI - graphical
user interface to change options and preview process of image conversion.
Command-line utility ' dcraw '
From: Leon Altoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/03 Fri AM 11:48:28 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Do you chimp?
Mike,
I've been known to take 20 shots and THEN have a quick peek to see if
the exposure is right and if I have the horizon straight. I have the
preview
Hi!
Almost everyone has, so far, missed the point. The actor was issued
with a _film_ camera but thought that he needed to chimp to look like
a real press photographer
Mike, I realized that. Unfortunately I don't find this amusing, rather
the opposite. Poor fellow.
Boris.
Looks cozy (said as a former real estate agent grin).
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Cotty wrote:
Thought I'd post the latest thrilling instalment, seeing as it's on-
topic. All pics
On Mar 2, 2006, at 3:08 PM, Cotty wrote:
Thought I'd post the latest thrilling instalment, seeing as it's on-
topic. All pics shot with the venerable SMC-K 15mm 3.5, all at f/
16, 800
ISO, on a 1DmarkII...
http://www.cottysnaps.com/Greystones/march2.html
Hmm. Looks about like my office
On Mar 3, 2006, at 7:55, mike wilson wrote:
Almost everyone has, so far, missed the point. The actor was
issued with a _film_ camera but thought that he needed to chimp to
look like a real press photographer
I caught that... funny! I wonder if chimping was the actor's idea
Real Photographers* come in both sexes. It is superior knowledge and
ability that separates us from the masses, not gender stereotypes. Also
we work in and record the flow of humanity rather than take pretty
pictures. And, Aaron, Real Photographers always hand-hold their 4x5.
* Real
On Mar 3, 2006, at 9:39 AM, graywolf wrote:
And, Aaron, Real Photographers always hand-hold their 4x5.
I can only assume that your 4x5s are the wussy non-monorail kinds,
then. Which allows me to still dismiss you out-of-hand.
-Brother Aaron
The only thing better than a 4x5 Auto Graflex is a 5x7 Auto Graflex. Of
course a 5x7 Speed is neat too.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Paul Ewins wrote:
I've got a few Speed Graphics
On Mar 3, 2006, at 8:29 AM, Cotty wrote:
Go away.
Cotty, you should join his group and continually invite their members
to join the PDML.
-Aaron
According to someone at Pentax Sweden there will be two 10 megapixel
SLR cameras coming this fall. One with shake reuction and the whole
kit and one bare-bone w/o shake reduction. Note that this is not a
confirmed source, just another rumor.
/Paul
You mean all the kinds and sizes ever made? Wow! That would be some
project. Old versions of Aaron Sussman's The Amature Photographers
Handbook (from the 40's and 50's) had a lot of that kind of information
in it, the later revisions (The 8th edition, 1973, is the only copy I
have now) dropped
Getting ready for the exhibition, I've been printing up a storm the
past week or two.
The HP 7960 has done yeoman service to print announcement postcards
(for the hundred or so I need, it's cheaper than I've found as yet to
print decent quality color at a print service), business cards,
Yes, they will be called the *istD2S (D2 Shake) and *istD2R (D2 Reduction).
Joking apart, thanks Paul.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 3:46 PM
Subject: Sv: Re: Some more new camera speculation
According to
On 3/3/06, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Almost everyone has, so far, missed the point. The actor was issued
with a _film_ camera but thought that he needed to chimp to look like a
real press photographer
I will bet a bottle of Romulan Ale that the director suggested this
Help! I've had a bit of a disaster and have installed a new system hard
drive and fresh virgin XP Pro. I installed RawShooterEssentials and it
loaded 20 pictures from the RAW directory. They appeared to be okay for
a few moments, but then one after the other, they all turned a ghastly
shade of
On 3/3/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hmm. Looks about like my office does right now. You've obviously been
busy... ;-)
My 1705 CRT is getting a bit long in the tooth and takes up to much
acreage on my 'desk'. I have to eBay a shed-load of stuff, I might just
squeeze in a
On 3/3/06, Aaron Reynolds, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, you should join his group and continually invite their members
to join the PDML.
Q.V. Groucho Marx ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
EEM is a wonderful paper, with only one flaw, which really precludes
using it for prints that will be sold. It yellows over time. But if
you're selling VFA (Or Hannemuhle Photo Rag, another fine paper that's
very similar to EEM, but Acid Free) and showing EEM, you'll be good.
I do most of my
Cotty wrote:
On 3/3/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hmm. Looks about like my office does right now. You've obviously been
busy... ;-)
My 1705 CRT is getting a bit long in the tooth and takes up to much
acreage on my 'desk'. I have to eBay a shed-load of stuff, I might
Sounds like fun. I wish I could be there to see your show.
I love printing. I print most of the shots I like, just to see what they really
look like when held in hand. I agree about Fine Art Paper, but I use it
sparingly. Wonderful stuff. It's also more prone to chipping than enhanced
matte,
Dario Bonazza wrote on 03.03.06 16:17:
Yes, they will be called the *istD2S (D2 Shake) and *istD2R (D2 Reduction).
And third one *istD2N (Nonsense) ;-) Anyway, maybe some more reliable
rumours about new D would appear during upcoming PIE 2006 starting 23.03?
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
On Mar 3, 2006, at 7:29 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
Hmm. Looks about like my office does right now. You've obviously
been busy... ;-)
My 1705 CRT is getting a bit long in the tooth and takes up to much
acreage on my 'desk'. I have to eBay a shed-load of stuff, I might
just
squeeze in a used
Hi Godfrey
I enjoy reading your reports and I wish you all the best with your
exhibition.
I had a quick glance the presentation on the web and it looks good but of
course I would love to see the big prints ;-)
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL
I have a really nice monitor and I agree -- even prints made on my old 7500
knock the socks off of looking at the monitor.
I also second Adam's recommendation of the Hahnemühle photo rag, a gorgeous
paper. All my bw Trinidad 24 x 36s were printed on that stuff.
I still don't know what I'm
I personally kind of prefer a *slightly* warm tint to my paper and
choose matte board with a similarly slightly warm cast, so EEM is
fine for me that way. I've got one print up that I made about 4 years
ago, mounted and framed the same as I'm doing for the exhibit, and it
always attracts
Aaron,
Where do you get it locally? I've seen prints on it, but due to a lack
of source, haven't had a chance to see my prints on it, and I really
want to.
-Adam
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
I have a really nice monitor and I agree -- even prints made on my old 7500
knock the socks off of
Now they are going to have to kill you! Watch your back Jack.
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Kodak KAF 10010 Sensor
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:40:21 -0800 (PST)
This may be well known and discussed at
Because I print BO with the Epson ink, I get all the warmth from the ink
(It's really quite warm on my C86) and prefer a cold paper to offset the
warmth, hence my preference for the otherwise similar Kayenta.
-Adam
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I personally kind of prefer a *slightly* warm tint
I found this in the back room of my studio the other day. It's a kit
I got ages ago to shoot panoramic images on my Pentax 6 X 7. I never
got around to using it. It uses spool adapters to fit two 35mm film
cassettes into the camera so you have cassette to cassette feed and
no need for
I bought it direct from Amplis, the Canadian distributor, in volume. I can get
you contact info if you want.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: thots on printing and prints
Date: Fri Mar 3, 2006 11:03 am
Size: 4K
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
While I detected no keen interest in the content of the Kodak response,
I'm going to forward a bit of the text for whomever:
The new Pentax D645 sensor (KAF 18000CE @ 18.6m total pixels)
leverages Kodak's 9-micron pixel design and color technology,image
quality, senssitivity, dynamic range and
It's a totally messed up shot, but I really quite like the effect. I
did nothing fancy to it other than the conversion from raw, no PS
filters or anything like that.
It hadn't been my plan to even take their respective photos. I was
setting up the lights and the camera when they decided to play,
On Mar 3, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
A 16mp (KAF-16802CE) has been designed at a square 1:1 aspect
ratio as
well as a 22mp (KAF-22000CE) for the traditional commercial and studio
photography market.
So the 645D will produce square images? Where's the fun in that?
Bob
Bob Shell wrote:
On Mar 3, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
A 16mp (KAF-16802CE) has been designed at a square 1:1 aspect ratio as
well as a 22mp (KAF-22000CE) for the traditional commercial and studio
photography market.
So the 645D will produce square images? Where's the fun in
I purchased my FA* 85mm F1.4 lens new in 1999-2000 time frame. It's been
used sparingly and is in essentially new condition--no marks at all on the
glass, no marks on the lens barrel, and just a little bag wear on the
hood. The lens comes with hood, front and rear caps, and original box.
Just got back from the hospital.
One vein in my upper right arm is clotted along the whole length.
So now I need to take one pill each day and two shots per day of some
blood thinner stuff.
(Coumadin pills and Lovenox shots)
Fortunately, with Virginia being a RN I didn't have to check into
I read it as the 645D will be the 18MP sensor not the 16MP.
However the 22MP sensor is meant for the traditional commercial and studio
photography market. Whats with that?
Tom C.
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject:
Super Graphic.
The only press camera (that I know of) with a 1/1000 shutter and a
rotating back.
Collin
At 09:49 AM 3/3/2006, you wrote:
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 09:43:57 -0500
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Is there a Sisterhood?
Message-ID: [EMAIL
Tom C wrote on 03.03.06 17:37:
However the 22MP sensor is meant for the traditional commercial and studio
photography market. Whats with that?
Lots of noise at high ISO, slow readout unsuitable for outdoor, fast work.
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
Yes, my 4x5 is a mere Nagaoka wood field.
My 8x10 is a monorail. And with a home-made bellows at that!
http://www.brendemuehl.net/images/ebay/8x10_01.jpg
http://www.brendemuehl.net/images/ebay/8x10_02.jpg
What I really want is the matching 8x10 Nagaoka wood field.
Like this:
Good luck with that, Collin. Hope you feel better soon.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Collin R Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just got back from the hospital.
One vein in my upper right arm is clotted along the whole length.
So now I need to take one pill
It's an interesting effect. The burned out highlights work as part of the
imagery here.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's a totally messed up shot, but I really quite like the effect. I
did nothing fancy to it other than the
yeesh, it doesn't, does it? Get well, Collin.
Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
Just got back from the hospital.
One vein in my upper right arm is clotted along the whole length.
So now I need to take one pill each day and two shots per day of some
blood thinner stuff.
(Coumadin pills and Lovenox
I didn't think Bob was serious, although I didn't see a smiling face
either.
Jack
--- Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
On Mar 3, 2006, at 11:18 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
A 16mp (KAF-16802CE) has been designed at a square 1:1 aspect
ratio as
well as a 22mp
yuck.
Take it easy and get well.
G
On Mar 3, 2006, at 8:35 AM, Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
Just got back from the hospital.
One vein in my upper right arm is clotted along the whole length.
So now I need to take one pill each day and two shots per day of
some blood thinner stuff.
I told myself that it is too pricey for the traditional Pentax
market.
What would you guess?
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read it as the 645D will be the 18MP sensor not the 16MP.
However the 22MP sensor is meant for the traditional commercial and
studio
photography market.
On Mar 3, 2006, at 11:33 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
No, that's the 16MP sensor that is square, the 18MP isn't.
Good.
Rectangular Bob
Yeah, Cotty, join and invite them all to the PDML. Then sit back and
watch the gmail invites roll in. Man, you'll be in heaven.
On 3/3/06, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 3, 2006, at 8:29 AM, Cotty wrote:
Go away.
Cotty, you should join his group and continually invite
Mail-Archive.com (where I read PDML) always goes off to la-la
land at critical moments. It hasn't updated in the past 24
hours, so I don't know what follow-up there was to the important
questions about Pentax and Tokina.
Ken, I posted the following yesterday, just before Mail-Archive
froze.
Ken, thanks very much for your clarification, which I have just
seen. (Mail-Archive just came back to life when I pointed out
the Jeff that it was not archiving.) This is great information,
and it is good to know that this information is publicly
available in Japan.
You wrote:
As I said,
Cotty wrote:
On 3/3/06, Roman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Would love to invite you to join googlegroup, share your DSLR
information, sample photos , useful tips on digital photography,
cameras, cleaning techniquest, whatever.
Please see groups website on:
http://skyandtelescope.com/observing/objects/comets/article_1684_1.asp
I got up a little too late yesterday to see it. The photo shown was
obviously done with the camera on a tracking mount. I would expect that it
would be possible to use a stationary mount and take many more/much shorter
I like the effect. Kind of a dream world look to it.
If i ever do the addition on the house, i want lights.:-)
Dave
-- Original message --
From: wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's a totally messed up shot, but I really
Rest up and get your problems cleared up soon. We'll keep you in our
thoughts. Bob S.
On 3/3/06, Collin R Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just got back from the hospital.
One vein in my upper right arm is clotted along the whole length.
So now I need to take one pill each day and two
You used to see paintiings like that in the Saturday Evening Post.
I like the effect of the burnt out highlights with the stark white
background. The interaction of the dogs is perfect. Nothing at all to
apologise for about that photo.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Yes, they will be called the *istD2S (D2 Shake) and *istD2R (D2
Reduction).
Ahhh! of course! And then the road would be paved for the ultimate
digital camera of the Space Age: *istR2D2.
:-)
Jostein
Means: if you have to ask the price, you can not afford it.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Tom C wrote:
I read it as the 645D will be the 18MP sensor not the 16MP.
However the 22MP
Me being interested in the 400. I'm in a hurry now. Details later
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton
We don't want Cotty here. That is the only reason he stays. grin
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Cotty wrote:
On 3/3/06, Aaron Reynolds, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, you should
On 3/03/06 12:24 PM, Joseph Tainter, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ken, thanks very much for your clarification, which I have just
seen. (Mail-Archive just came back to life when I pointed out
the Jeff that it was not archiving.) This is great information,
and it is good to know that this
The studio market aren't concerned with write speeds and will put up with
sensors that need multiple pops or long exposures (like scanning backs).
They're okay with being chained to a computer.
So the 22MP is probably no good for running around cameras.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
Henceforth known as Rectangular Pants Bob ?
Jack
--- Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 3, 2006, at 11:33 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
No, that's the 16MP sensor that is square, the 18MP isn't.
Good.
Rectangular Bob
__
Do You
I purchased my FA* 85mm F1.4 lens new in 1999-2000 time frame. It's been
used sparingly and is in essentially new condition--no marks at all on
the glass, no marks on the lens barrel, and just a little bag wear on
the hood. The lens comes with hood, front and rear caps, and original
box.
I hate aging. Take very good care, Collin.
-Lon
Doug Brewer wrote:
yeesh, it doesn't, does it? Get well, Collin.
On Mar 3, 2006, at 1:33 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Henceforth known as Rectangular Pants Bob ?
One of my models calls me Shellbob Squarepants.
Bob
Just getting familiar with the my new ds and 16-45 ed DA zoom. Because I
have a innate lazy side, I am wondering what in-camera settings(
saturation, sharpness, contrast) ds owners have found to be the most
satisfactory. Do you stick with the default settings and do any
adjustments post
On Mar 3, 2006, at 11:22 AM, dick graham wrote:
Just getting familiar with the my new ds and 16-45 ed DA zoom.
Because I have a innate lazy side, I am wondering what in-camera
settings( saturation, sharpness, contrast) ds owners have found to
be the most satisfactory. Do you stick
I shoot with that lens quite often, but only in RAW mode. Of course in-camera
settings have no effect on RAW images. In conversion, I find that the default
ACR 2.4 contrast setting is just about right for good exposures of most subject
matter. When converting full-frame images to 144 meg files,
On Mar 3, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
- turn guide display off
What does this one do?
-Aaron
Hi guys,
For my birthday my parents gave me (as well as a Manfrotto 190CL) a
certificate to an *IstDS. Zaweee! (You should have seen my face when I
opened that card.) So I have a few questions.
1) Do you have any recommendations of places I should look? (There are
some on e-bay but there
Put it on your web site - or anyones website! I can put it on mine if you
mail it to me.
Regards
jens
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jack Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. marts 2006 05:40
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Kodak
Paul, and others.
I really notice a difference in sharpening from the Nikon files to the Pentax
files.If i
forget to sharpen an
image and print it out at home it still look good. The pentax is a lot softer.
if i
forget.
Nikon file gets by with 75-90%, 0.3 picas, and threshold to 0.
Pentax,
Hi guys,
For my birthday my parents gave me (as well as a Manfrotto 190CL) a
certificate to an *IstDS. Zaweee! (You should have seen my face when I
opened that card.) So I have a few questions.
1) Do you have any recommendations of places I should
Bruce.
Nice ligting and pose.
Just a tad to soft for my tastes though.:-)
Dave B
This is a test shot with my newly re-aquired
85
soft lens. I was a
bit surprised that my wife liked this one, as she normally doesn't
care much for soft pictures.
While doubling the percentage increases the amount of overall sharpening,
raising the threshold level reduces the way it's applied -- as nearly as I can
tell through simple examination of the results. So your Nikon vs. Pentax USM
settings may not be as disparate as you believe. I do remember
1 - 100 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
