On 4/11/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a psychological thing. Anybody who knows a good shrink ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
On the dumb side but better than nothing:
http://www.manifestation.com/neurotoys/eliza.php3
Cheers,
Gautam
Igor, others may have better suggestions, but in my experience you should:
Make sure that all your glass is as clean as possible.
Remove any filters, unless you're using BW. It has been suggested that
using a haze filter will help, but I am not sure I agree.
Make sure the cabin window is
On 18/4/06, Igor Roshchin, discombobulated, unleashed:
1. Photography from a commercial airplane.
What suggestions do you have for taking pictures from a
commercial airplane?
How to make them sharper and overcome some type of cast
that is often seen in the day-time images of this kind (not clouds
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/06/
in_pictures_chernobyl0s_lost_city/html/1.stm
http://tinyurl.com/rm6du
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Op Wed, 19 Apr 2006 09:03:01 +0200 schreef Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 18/4/06, Igor Roshchin, discombobulated, unleashed:
1. Photography from a commercial airplane.
What suggestions do you have for taking pictures from a
commercial airplane?
Open the window.
I always request a seat next
On Apr 19, 2006, at 12:18 AM, David Savage wrote:
FA 100mm f2.8 Macro isn't too shabby:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/GESO/GESO_001/pages/IMGP2152_2.html
Of course you need friendly birds :-)
Not necessarily, but you'd better be prepared to crop. A lot.
Here's a small section of a
Cotty wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/06/
in_pictures_chernobyl0s_lost_city/html/1.stm
http://tinyurl.com/rm6du
Cheers,
Cotty
Thanks for sharing them.
Très sad!
keith
The SMC Pentax- A 400/5.6 can sometimes be had for as little as $300.
$400 to $450 is a more typical price. There are also M and K versions
of the Pentax lens (SMC Pentax-M 400/5.6 and SMC Pentax 400/5.6), but
neither will focus close enough for bird photography without the
addition of an
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Op Wed, 19 Apr 2006 09:03:01 +0200 schreef Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 18/4/06, Igor Roshchin, discombobulated, unleashed:
1. Photography from a commercial airplane.
What suggestions do you have for taking pictures from a
commercial airplane?
Open the window.
I
On 4/19/06, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not necessarily, but you'd better be prepared to crop. A lot.
Here's a small section of a slide I just happened to be working on
this evening...
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/temp/swans.html
That's Velvia grain you can see ;) The image is a
Hello, list-
Ive seen some recent discussion on the list about some of the Tokina 400mm
telephotos but have only caught a few of the messages (I usually follow the
list via the archive which only seems to archive a small percentage of the
messages for some reason), so I apologize if this
:-)
Thank you, but no thank you.
After what I've read about Eliza, she is very frustrating.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From:
I was officing in Edmond, Oklahoma, about 10 miles from the
blast.
The wife was @ home, about 25 miles away.
It rattled the windows.
One rescue team wrote this on the side of the Journal-Record
(business newspaper) building:
Part of the reason it seems so life like is that many therapists are
trained to parrot things back just like Eliza does. Both are kind of stupid.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Gautam
Me neither.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax info in Japanese
Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I bought last fall from a list member, the K 400 f5.6. It was in rough
condition, but the glass etc is good.Manual Focus. However if i can find an A
or AF i might part with it.
My only tests with it are a few shots of a broken down dock at a pond edge,
using the istD and some Iflord BW HP5
Will the DS with v2.0 of the firmware support SD cards with a greater than
2GB capacity? I thought I saw that it does, but I cannot find the link now.
Shel
I know that. I should, I have lived with a therapist for 15 years ;-)
Not anymore, but that's a different story.
But there is one important difference between the joke therapist Eliza, and
a real (and good) one. When a good therapist reflects you, it has a purpose.
It's like looking into a
On 4/19/06, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Me neither.
Dario
OK, I feel a bit better now ;)
--
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
Interesting stuff, to me anyway. I'm attracted to abandon urban
landscapes in general. I think I'm fascinated by what it took to leave
something so valuable behind.
This month's issue of National Geographic has a 20 years later on
Chernobyl and the surrounding region; the spread is shot by
DS firmware v.1.2 allows SD cards greater than 1GB (how much greater is
unknown).
v.2.0 also includes all v.1.2 features.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 4:17 PM
Subject: Supported SD Cards
Yes, Dario - that much I knew from updating the original to v1.02.
However, at that time there were no, or very few, SD cards with a capacity
greater than 2GB, hence my question. I don't want to buy a 4GB card only
to find it doesn't work or work properly. I was hoping that someone who
actually
Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm especially intrigued by that largely it is not potato, since I
strongly suspected that :-)
Dario
You know, saying largely it is not potato probably should be for
the most
Here is a web site that I found very interesting and without
sensational trends and/or pretentiousness very often present in the
news publications.
Ghost Town at
http://www.angelfire.com/extreme4/kiddofspeed/
or
http://elenafilatova.com
Unfortunately, angelfire is rather slow, and sometimes
I recall seeing some discussion on DPReview.com regarding 4Gbyte
cards. Some folks have not had any problems with some makes, some
folks haven't been able to get them to work. File system doesn't seem
to be the problem as firmware v2.0 implements FAT32 already.
Evidently, there are
Bob Shell wrote:
Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm especially intrigued by that largely it is not potato, since I
strongly suspected that :-)
You know, saying largely it is not potato probably should be for
As always with emerging technologies, it's best to stay one jump
behind the bleeding edge for maximum compatibility and best
performance per dollar.
As always with bleeding edge technologies, it's best to stay one jump
behind the edge for minimum bleeding...
Fred
Replies embedded:
Hello, list-
IÂve seen some recent discussion on the list about some of the Tokina 400mm
telephotos but have only caught a few of the messages (I usually follow the
list via the archive which only seems to archive a small percentage of the
messages for some reason), so I
Shel, a 4 GB CF card causes my D to boot up noticeably slowly. For this reason
my 4 GB Lexar card gets used only when all other cards are full. I don't know
whether the DS and an SD card will also have this problem.
Joe
Actually, I agree with you. I'm satisfied with the 1GB cards, although I
can see getting a 2GB card for a number of reasons. I mostly asked about
the 4GB card for a friend who recently bought a DS, but possibly for my own
consideration as well.. My next card purchase will probably be a 2GB card
The D is quite a sluggard in some respects when compared to the DS and the
DS2. It's not surprising that it would boot slower. It would be something
to watch out for, though. Good point.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: jtainter
Shel, a 4 GB CF card causes my D to boot up noticeably
Didn't this turn out to be bogus?
Norm
From: Igor Roshchin
Here is a web site that I found very interesting and without
sensational trends and/or pretentiousness very often present in the
news publications.
Ghost Town at
http://www.angelfire.com/extreme4/kiddofspeed/
or
Well, sort of. The backstory about speeding through on a
motorcycle without official permission was discredited.
As such, I'd be inclined to view the whole site with more
than a little suspicion. But the images are eye-grabbing.
Claiming the site to be free of pretentiousness and/or
Switching between 512M, 1G and 2G Sandisk Ultra II SD cards in the
DS doesn't seem to change the 'power on to ready' time at all that I
can detect. I don't have a 4G card to try so I can't report on that.
Godfrey
On Apr 19, 2006, at 10:16 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
The D is quite a
I see so little difference between 60x and 80x cards in the DS that
it would be hard to imagine anything faster as being of significant
consequence with regards to write speed. The DS2 and DL/DL2 models
supposedly write faster and can utilize a 133x card's capabilities,
but I haven't seen
Yes, the girl on the motorcycle story is fiction.
-- Original message --
From: Norman Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Didn't this turn out to be bogus?
Norm
From: Igor Roshchin
Here is a web site that I found very interesting and without
sensational
Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And one more thing -
Russian Pentax rep was saying something about USM lenses to be shown
on Photokina
From this month's French magazine Réponses Photo...
| Des rumeurs disent aussi que Pentax passerait à la motorisation
| interne de ses
On Apr 19, 2006, at 12:30 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm especially intrigued by that largely it is not potato,
since I
strongly suspected that :-)
You know,
On Apr 19, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The DS2 and DL/DL2 models supposedly write faster and can utilize a
133x card's capabilities, but I haven't seen proof of that yet.
I have both a cheapie Kingston 1GB SD card and a 133x Kingston 1GB card
-- the 133x is very obviously
http://www.hdtune.com/
or
http://www.simplisoftware.com/Public/index.php?request=HdTach
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Aaron Reynolds
I have both a cheapie Kingston 1GB SD card and a 133x Kingston 1GB card
-- the 133x is very obviously faster by a really significant amount in
the DS2.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Shell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 April 2006 16:39
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax info in Japanese
Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm
As always with emerging technologies, it's best to stay one jump behind the
bleeding edge for maximum compatibility and best performance per dollar.
Memory cards are a commodity purchase, it makes sense to simply get the best
bang for the buck and eschew always wanting the latest, biggest,
mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Big potato or (being Pentax) small potato?
There's a popular saying here that goes like: The most stupid peasants
have the biggest potatoes.
So, small potatoes, rather. We know who the stupid peasants are. ;-)
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG -
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 02:03:14PM -0400, Bob Shell wrote:
On Apr 19, 2006, at 12:30 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm especially intrigued by that largely it is
I've been quoted a price of $60/mo for HS access. That seems awfully high
to me. How does that compare with what you're paying?
Shel
Unfortunately, both of those would require a PC and a USB 2.0 port -- I know
for a fact that my card-to-computer data rate is far slower than the
camera-to-card rate.'
I guess I could record the shutter sound and measure the fps once the buffer is
filled -- to time how fast the buffer empties.
I'm paying $26 CDN/month for DSL. $60 US seems nuts.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: High Speed Internet Access
Date: Wed Apr 19, 2006 3:35 pm
Size: 139 bytes
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
I've been quoted a price of $60/mo for HS access.
I pay $34 Can/Month, thats with taxes. One time fee of $130 to buy their modem.
Its only phone DSL but its really fast.
Your quote sounds high.
Dave
I'm paying $26 CDN/month for DSL. $60 US
seems nuts.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Shel
For SBC/Yahoo DSL I'm paying $14.99/month.
Speed is adequate, except for my sons who like to download
Simpsons episodes.
In rural western Oklahoma the phone co. wants to charge $50 or so
per month for DSL. And only 768K at that.
Cory,
Where @ that price?
Collin
On Apr 19, 2006, at 14:35, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I've been quoted a price of $60/mo for HS access. That seems
awfully high
to me. How does that compare with what you're paying?
DSL in Minneapolis: I'm paying about $24/month for the DSL signal
(from QWEST) and would pay an additional
It is mesmerizing, and you will find that you cannot get any work done.
http://www.newportharbor.us/computerworks.htm
I do have to wonder what kind of mind comes up with something like this.
Joe
Of course, with a subject line like you've used, and the comments in your
message, it will be hard for most people not to evoke some curiosity and
visit the site.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 4/19/2006 1:27:50 PM
Subject: OT:
About $43 - Earthlink ISP through Time-Warner cable. $60 seems kind of
high unless it includes lots of useful bells and whistles. SBC is
offering DSL for $30 for the first year - don't know what it bumps up to
after that, but I doubt much higher than $40.
-P
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
She's got another, interesting website about excavating the WWII
defences around Kiev.
http://www.theserpentswall.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the girl on the motorcycle story is fiction.
-- Original message --
From: Norman Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm especially intrigued by that largely it is not potato, since I
strongly suspected that :-)
You know, saying largely it is not potato
On Apr 19, 2006, at 4:35 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
About $43 - Earthlink ISP through Time-Warner cable. $60 seems
kind of high unless it includes lots of useful bells and whistles.
SBC is offering DSL for $30 for the first year - don't know what it
bumps up to after that, but I doubt
On Apr 19, 2006, at 4:35 PM, mike wilson wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm especially intrigued by that largely it is not potato,
since I
strongly suspected
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I've been quoted a price of $60/mo for HS access. That seems awfully high
to me. How does that compare with what you're paying?
Shel
£17.99 for 2Mb speed, 1Gb download limit per month. After that, it
reverts to 1Mb/unlimited.
My brother in law has just had his
Bob Shell wrote:
On Apr 19, 2006, at 4:35 PM, mike wilson wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm especially intrigued by that largely it is not potato,
since I
I have noticed that many of my istD shots in manual focus are slightly
out of focus. The area in focus is always in the background of the
spot I focused on.
Now I'm wondering if I need to blame my eyes, the +/- slider of the
eyepiece, the mounting of the focusing screen, maybe the ccd
alignment???
There you are again, :-)))
Saúde,
Manuel
-Mensagem original-
De: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada: quarta-feira, 19 de Abril de 2006 8:03
Para: pentax list
Assunto: Re: photography from an airplane and unsharp mask
On 18/4/06, Igor Roshchin, discombobulated, unleashed:
1.
Indeed not, if you happen to run your browser as a remote X-windows
client! It was very close to hang my pc.
If this isn't art, some people do have too much free time.
Groeten,
Vic
PS. luckily there's no download version for screensaver or even desktop
background
jtainter wrote:
and you
Vic
PS. luckily there's no download version for screensaver or even desktop
background
You CAN right click to download the .gif and save it as a tiled
background... :-P
Tom C.
On Apr 19, 2006, at 4:40 PM, mike wilson wrote:
My brother in law has just had his access throttled by the
supplier. He was paying for unlimited use and they told him he was
using it too much...
I wonder how they define unlimited.
Bob
On Apr 19, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
On Apr 19, 2006, at 4:35 PM, mike wilson wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm especially
probably focusing screen. this is not uncommon with the D. for wide
open shots, AF is often much more accurate for me, my D backfocuses also
in manual focus. i need to get it aligned.
rg
Toine wrote:
I have noticed that many of my istD shots in manual focus are slightly
out of focus.
Of course, with a subject line like you've used, and the comments in your
message, it will be hard for most people not to evoke some curiosity and
visit the site.
Shel
*
Darn, but you're a smart guy, Shel.
Joe
[Original Message]
From: jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Charter Cable 3000kbs highspeed internet $49.95 + basic cable and taxes
equal about $64/month. That gives me downloads in the 400KBS+ range* (if
the server has the bandwidth to feed it to me that fast. Standard
1000kbs highspeed internet (usually gave me downloads in the 100-125KBS
range) from
Toine,
You might try both front and back focusing.
1) Start the MF beyond a given point and move 'back' to the point.
2) Start the MF short of a given point and move 'up' to the point.
This may sort out the eye question.
Do you have and are you using, an in-focus indicator light in the
On Apr 19, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
The DS2 and DL/DL2 models supposedly write faster and can utilize
a 133x card's capabilities, but I haven't seen proof of that yet.
I have both a cheapie Kingston 1GB SD card and a 133x Kingston 1GB
card -- the 133x is very obviously
Thanks Joe, Rube Goldberg is my idol! ;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: jtainter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 3:26 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: OT: Stay Away From This Web Site
It is mesmerizing, and you will find that you cannot get any
I have the same problem, I haven't been able to part with
it long enough to get it serviced.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 4:10 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Manual focus out of focus
probably focusing
Those are Windows utilities, Shel, and say nothing about in-camera
write speed.
On Mac OS X, you can check IO throughput from card to computer by
running the Activity Monitor application and looking at disk
activity. Fill a card to test and then do a copy with the Finder from
card to
$60/month sounds high, but might be because of your rural location.
When I first went to DSL service in 2000, it was $59/month at
384/128Kbps in Cupertino, unmetered. Nowadays, DSL service through
SBC/Yahoo.com in Sunnyvale costs me $29.95/month with 1500/768Kbps
performance, unmetered.
- Original Message -
From: Don Williams
Subject: Re: long lens for birds?
That's strange. You would expect the opposite considering the sensor is
so much smaller than the film frame.
Digital sensors seem somewhat less forgiving than film in this regard.
William Robb
Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:48:36 -0700
pnstenquist wrote:
Yes, the girl on the motorcycle story is fiction.
Is it?
Sorry, I was not aware. I 've known this page for couple years,
and haven't heard confirmed claims that it was false.
I'll search Google later, when I get time, but if you have
pointers
Bob Shell wrote:
On Apr 19, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
On Apr 19, 2006, at 4:35 PM, mike wilson wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it's because the company has a monopoly in the area. They provide the
only cable service for miles around, and in order to get HSI, I need a
cable.
Yes, my location is somewhat rural, but it's not that far off the beaten
path. Casa Belinkoff is less than a mile from a main drag, less as the
I just looked at some pictures there again,
and was suprised, that the same objects (kids' beds, gas masks in the
kindergarden/day care, fair-wheel, etc.) and parts of the area
(although not the same photos) appear on that website (photos and the
movie) and the other two websites posted in this
I pay about $60 for comcast cable modem service and basic tv cable.
But it's faster than DSL. A lot faster than the DSL I can get here.
Paul
On Apr 19, 2006, at 6:18 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
No, it's because the company has a monopoly in the area. They provide
the
only cable service for
On 19/4/06, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've been quoted a price of $60/mo for HS access. That seems awfully high
to me. How does that compare with what you're paying?
Here in the UK, I pay £20 a month for 1 Gb download, 512kb upload speed.
Very reliable, no problems. Hardware
Who's the carrier? For whatever reason, $60 sounds a bit high but not
outrageously so.
Godfrey
On Apr 19, 2006, at 3:18 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
No, it's because the company has a monopoly in the area. They
provide the
only cable service for miles around, and in order to get HSI, I need
Thanks Joe. I have long tried to find a way to describe what my
workplace is like; this captures it nicely.
Stan
--
Note: Information of the article is things such as when writing or when
publishing, under present conditions there is a possibility of
differing.
What replies
- Original Message -
From: Stan Halpin
Subject: Re: OT: Stay Away From This Web Site
--
Note: Information of the article is things such as when writing or when
publishing, under present conditions there is a possibility of
differing.
What replies individually concerning
Of I added cable tv the price would be about $30.00 higher.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist
I pay about $60 for comcast cable modem service and basic tv cable.
But it's faster than DSL. A lot faster than the DSL I can get here.
Comcast ... I think it's outrageously high - certainly based on what others
have said they are paying. Plus I get less web space than I have now as
well as fewer email addresses. Right now I've got 170mb of free web space
and eight email addresses. I can get a whopping 25mb of space with
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Designer Mail isn't just fun to send, it's fun to receive. Use special
stationery, fonts and colors.
Yeah, I realized that after the message was posted. But, isn't write speed
in the computer be similar to write speed in the camera?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Those are Windows utilities, Shel, and say nothing about in-camera
write speed.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Fiona Howarth
Subject: unsubscribe
Har.
Like as if that's gonna happen.
William Robb
On Apr 19, 2006, at 5:43 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
You can get a sense of relative speeds by setting the camera to Manual
exposure, choosing 1/1000 second or so, and timing several runs from
the start of a burst of five exposures to when the busy light goes
out. Without further
On Apr 19, 2006, at 8:31 PM, Fiona Howarth wrote:
Designer Mail isn't just fun to send, it's fun to receive. Use special
stationery, fonts and colors.
OH NOOO
Just had a five year old flashback of an e-mail that had balloons and
streamers and said HTML is fun WO in giant
You gotta be kidding.. I don't even accept HTML mail without first checking
on who it's from. A friend sent some crap like that and I expressed my,
um, displeasure. I hate HTML mail with a passion. 99% of the time there's
no need for it.
Why would you even ask me such a question?!
Shel
On Apr 19, 2006, at 8:44 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
You gotta be kidding.. I don't even accept HTML mail without first
checking
on who it's from. A friend sent some crap like that and I expressed
my,
um, displeasure. I hate HTML mail with a passion. 99% of the time
there's
no need for it.
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Reynolds
Subject: Re: unsubscribe
Yes, I know! It was during a gigantic argument over whether or not the
PDML should accept HTML mails, and it was a response to just how
amazing they are -- a very, very annoying and sarcastic one.
I also
When in doubt, blame it on Kirkland.
Paul
On Apr 19, 2006, at 8:57 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Aaron Reynolds Subject: Re:
unsubscribe
Yes, I know! It was during a gigantic argument over whether or not
the PDML should accept HTML mails, and it was a
On Apr 19, 2006, at 8:57 PM, Wheatfield Willie wrote:
I think it was Kirkland Ramsey III
Nope -- it was definitely a good guy being a smartass.
-Aaron
Comcast does give you good speed -- 8Mbps/768kbps are the current
numbera. Problems are now few and far between. I'd have to rate the
service as excellent. They also provide unlimited photo storage. I
don't use that, but it might be a plus for some.
On Apr 19, 2006, at 8:30 PM, Shel
Sandisk ultra II 2G:
JPEG 3.5 second
RAW 14 second
result of five runs each, from when I pressed the shutter release to when
the busy light goes out after 5 exposures. DS body
G
On Apr 19, 2006, at 17:27, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I pay about $60 for comcast cable modem service and basic tv
cable. But it's faster than DSL. A lot faster than the DSL I can
get here.
True dat. But cable does have a few downsides for me: 1. No fixed IP
address 2. Serious
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
