Mishka wrote:
US is seriously begind the developed world as far as
broadband goes. Lousy and expensive. I am paying
~$50 for Cablevision (after $20 for 6 month initial period).
When I discuss this with my friends in Toronto, I almost
start hating them...
best,
mishka
On 4/20/06, William Robb <[
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Aaron Reynolds"
Subject: Re: unsubscribe
On Apr 19, 2006, at 8:57 PM, Wheatfield Willie wrote:
I think it was Kirkland Ramsey III
Nope -- it was definitely a good guy being a smartass.
That lets me off the hook.
William Robb
W
Cathy, Reuben, Rick, and I took a drive up to Petaluma one fine September
afternoon, and, having a slight case of the munchies, stopped at an A&W for
a little snack. The old Spotmatic was handy, and this was one of the snaps
that resulted that afternoon.
Actually, I decided to try the new Spot He
why that should be a reason? mine is quite alright as it is...
best,
mishka
On 4/20/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mishka"
> Subject: Re: High Speed Internet Access
>
>
> > US is seriously begind the developed world as far as
> > broadband goe
- Original Message -
From: "Mishka"
Subject: Re: High Speed Internet Access
US is seriously begind the developed world as far as
broadband goes. Lousy and expensive. I am paying
~$50 for Cablevision (after $20 for 6 month initial period).
When I discuss this with my friends in Toront
US is seriously begind the developed world as far as
broadband goes. Lousy and expensive. I am paying
~$50 for Cablevision (after $20 for 6 month initial period).
When I discuss this with my friends in Toronto, I almost
start hating them...
best,
mishka
On 4/20/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Robinson"
Subject: Re: High Speed Internet Access
On Apr 19, 2006, at 17:27, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I pay about $60 for comcast cable modem service and basic tv cable. But
it's faster than DSL. A lot faster than the DSL I can get here.
True
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Kerstetter"
Subject: Re: long lens for birds?
so lenes that are optimized for digital in addition to being smaller
are designed to have less CA?
I don't know about smaller, the two digital only lenses that I have are both
horses.
Lens design is
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Reynolds"
Subject: Re: unsubscribe
On Apr 19, 2006, at 8:57 PM, Wheatfield Willie wrote:
I think it was Kirkland Ramsey III
Nope -- it was definitely a good guy being a smartass.
That lets me off the hook.
William Robb
1Gb is probably an exaggeration. Unless you
have a direct link to the backbone, which I doubt.
best,
mishka
On 4/19/06, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19/4/06, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >I've been quoted a price of $60/mo for HS access. That seems awfully high
> >to
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Don Williams"
Subject: Re: long lens for birds?
That's strange. You would expect the opposite considering the sensor
is so much smaller than the film frame.
Digital sensors seem somewhat less forgiving than film in this regard.
Willia
I pay about $60/month for 6MB down and 768k up. It's the top speed
offered here and I would use more if I could, 'cause I spend a lot of
time playing online games.
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Apr 19, 2006, at 17:27, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I pay about $60 for comcast cable modem service and basic tv cable.
But it's faster than DSL. A lot faster than the DSL I can get here.
True dat. But cable does have a few downsides for me: 1. No fixed IP
You
On Apr 19, 2006, at 8:33 PM, Russell Kerstetter wrote:
so lenes that are optimized for digital in addition to being smaller
are designed to have less CA?
No optical designer ever designed a lens to have more CA ... it's
just that film and digital sensors constitute entirely different
kind
so lenes that are optimized for digital in addition to being smaller
are designed to have less CA?
Russell
Hi all,
I just picked up a K1000 on eBay, it is unlike the other K1000s that have
passed through my hands in that it is not an SE but it has split image
focusing (the circle around the split image is larger than on the SE that I
have) and the top is exactly the same as that of my KM, with serial
My service is aDSL using PPPoE, but I don't use my home machine as a
web server or file server so the lack of a fixed IP address isn't
relevant. I also use an external account (leased from GoDaddy.com)
for the gdgphoto.com data store and the .Mac servers otherwise. I do
a lot of up and down
Not necessarily. Besides, what is interesting is to determine how
fast the camera can perform writes to the fast card, not how fast the
card can do IO.
Godfrey
On Apr 19, 2006, at 5:32 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Yeah, I realized that after the message was posted. But, isn't
write speed
i
The ice cream man came at magic hour. He stopped two doors down. I was
working in the garden. I ran upstairs, spun the DA 50-200 onto a D and
ran back outside. Just had time to get off a shot or two. It's not
ideal. Certainly wish the mirror wasn't in front of the girl's head.
But I love the li
I upload quite a bit to an FTP server. Sometimes 200 megs at a single
session. It seems relatively fast. Certainly not a problem. I believe
my upload speed is identical to that Godfrey posted for his DSL line,
although my download speed is quite a bit faster. But I'm no expert. I
don't know wha
On Apr 19, 2006, at 17:27, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I pay about $60 for comcast cable modem service and basic tv
cable. But it's faster than DSL. A lot faster than the DSL I can
get here.
True dat. But cable does have a few downsides for me: 1. No fixed IP
address 2. Serious restrictions
Sandisk ultra II 2G:
JPEG 3.5 second
RAW 14 second
result of five runs each, from when I pressed the shutter release to when
the busy light goes out after 5 exposures. DS body
G
Comcast does give you good speed -- 8Mbps/768kbps are the current
numbera. Problems are now few and far between. I'd have to rate the
service as excellent. They also provide unlimited photo storage. I
don't use that, but it might be a plus for some.
On Apr 19, 2006, at 8:30 PM, Shel Belinkoff
On Apr 19, 2006, at 8:57 PM, Wheatfield Willie wrote:
I think it was Kirkland Ramsey III
Nope -- it was definitely a good guy being a smartass.
-Aaron
When in doubt, blame it on Kirkland.
Paul
On Apr 19, 2006, at 8:57 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Aaron Reynolds" Subject: Re:
unsubscribe
Yes, I know! It was during a gigantic argument over whether or not
the PDML should accept HTML mails, and it was a respo
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Reynolds"
Subject: Re: unsubscribe
Yes, I know! It was during a gigantic argument over whether or not the
PDML should accept HTML mails, and it was a response to just how
"amazing" they are -- a very, very annoying and sarcastic one.
I also b
On Apr 19, 2006, at 8:44 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
You gotta be kidding.. I don't even accept HTML mail without first
checking
on who it's from. A friend sent some crap like that and I expressed
my,
um, displeasure. I hate HTML mail with a passion. 99% of the time
there's
no need for it.
You gotta be kidding.. I don't even accept HTML mail without first checking
on who it's from. A friend sent some crap like that and I expressed my,
um, displeasure. I hate HTML mail with a passion. 99% of the time there's
no need for it.
Why would you even ask me such a question?!
Shel
> [Or
On Apr 19, 2006, at 8:31 PM, Fiona Howarth wrote:
Designer Mail isn't just fun to send, it's fun to receive. Use special
stationery, fonts and colors.
OH NOOO
Just had a five year old flashback of an e-mail that had balloons and
streamers and said "HTML is fun WO" in giant
On Apr 19, 2006, at 5:43 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
You can get a sense of relative speeds by setting the camera to Manual
exposure, choosing 1/1000 second or so, and timing several runs from
the start of a burst of five exposures to when the busy light goes
out. Without further instrumenting
- Original Message -
From: "Fiona Howarth"
Subject: unsubscribe
Har.
Like as if that's gonna happen.
William Robb
Yeah, I realized that after the message was posted. But, isn't write speed
in the computer be similar to write speed in the camera?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
> Those are Windows utilities, Shel, and say nothing about in-camera
> write speed.>
> Shel Belinkoff wr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Designer Mail isn't just fun to send, it's fun to receive. Use special
stationery, fonts and colors.
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSN
Comcast ... I think it's outrageously high - certainly based on what others
have said they are paying. Plus I get less web space than I have now as
well as fewer email addresses. Right now I've got 170mb of free web space
and eight email addresses. I can get a whopping 25mb of space with Comcast
Of I added cable tv the price would be about $30.00 higher.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Paul Stenquist
> I pay about $60 for comcast cable modem service and basic tv cable.
> But it's faster than DSL. A lot faster than the DSL I can get here.
- Original Message -
From: "Stan Halpin"
Subject: Re: OT: Stay Away From This Web Site
--
Note: Information of the article is things such as when writing or when
publishing, under present conditions there is a possibility of
differing.
What replies individually concerning
Thanks Joe. I have long tried to find a way to describe what my
workplace is like; this captures it nicely.
Stan
--
Note: Information of the article is things such as when writing or when
publishing, under present conditions there is a possibility of
differing.
What replies individuall
Who's the carrier? For whatever reason, $60 sounds a bit high but not
outrageously so.
Godfrey
On Apr 19, 2006, at 3:18 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
No, it's because the company has a monopoly in the area. They
provide the
only cable service for miles around, and in order to get HSI, I need
On 19/4/06, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I've been quoted a price of $60/mo for HS access. That seems awfully high
>to me. How does that compare with what you're paying?
Here in the UK, I pay £20 a month for 1 Gb download, 512kb upload speed.
Very reliable, no problems. Hardware
I pay about $60 for comcast cable modem service and basic tv cable.
But it's faster than DSL. A lot faster than the DSL I can get here.
Paul
On Apr 19, 2006, at 6:18 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
No, it's because the company has a monopoly in the area. They provide
the
only cable service for mil
I just looked at some pictures there again,
and was suprised, that the same objects (kids' beds, gas masks in the
kindergarden/day care, fair-wheel, etc.) and parts of the area
(although not the same photos) appear on that website (photos and the
movie) and the other two websites posted in this t
No, it's because the company has a monopoly in the area. They provide the
only cable service for miles around, and in order to get HSI, I need a
cable.
Yes, my location is somewhat rural, but it's not that far off the beaten
path. Casa Belinkoff is less than a mile from a main drag, less as the
Bob Shell wrote:
On Apr 19, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
On Apr 19, 2006, at 4:35 PM, mike wilson wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:48:36 -0700
pnstenquist wrote:
> Yes, the girl on the motorcycle story is fiction.
Is it?
Sorry, I was not aware. I 've known this page for couple years,
and haven't heard confirmed claims that it was false.
I'll search Google later, when I get time, but if you have
pointers
- Original Message -
From: "Don Williams"
Subject: Re: long lens for birds?
That's strange. You would expect the opposite considering the sensor is
so much smaller than the film frame.
Digital sensors seem somewhat less forgiving than film in this regard.
William Robb
$60/month sounds high, but might be because of your rural location.
When I first went to DSL service in 2000, it was $59/month at
384/128Kbps in Cupertino, unmetered. Nowadays, DSL service through
SBC/Yahoo.com in Sunnyvale costs me $29.95/month with 1500/768Kbps
performance, unmetered.
G
Those are Windows utilities, Shel, and say nothing about in-camera
write speed.
On Mac OS X, you can check IO throughput from card to computer by
running the Activity Monitor application and looking at disk
activity. Fill a card to test and then do a copy with the Finder from
card to hard
I have the same problem, I haven't been able to part with
it long enough to get it serviced.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 4:10 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Manual focus out of focus
>
>
> probably fo
Thanks Joe, Rube Goldberg is my idol! ;-)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: jtainter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 3:26 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: OT: Stay Away From This Web Site
>
>
> It is mesmerizing, and you will find that you cannot ge
On Apr 19, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
The DS2 and DL/DL2 models supposedly write faster and can utilize
a 133x card's capabilities, but I haven't seen proof of that yet.
I have both a cheapie Kingston 1GB SD card and a 133x Kingston 1GB
card -- the 133x is very obviously fast
Toine,
You might try both front and back focusing.
1) Start the MF beyond a given point and move 'back' to the point.
2) Start the MF short of a given point and move 'up' to the point.
This may sort out the eye question.
Do you have and are you using, an in-focus indicator light in the
viewfind
Charter Cable 3000kbs highspeed internet $49.95 + basic cable and taxes
equal about $64/month. That gives me downloads in the 400KBS+ range* (if
the server has the bandwidth to feed it to me that fast. Standard
1000kbs highspeed internet (usually gave me downloads in the 100-125KBS
range) from
Of course, with a subject line like you've used, and the comments in your
message, it will be hard for most people not to evoke some curiosity and
visit the site.
Shel
*
Darn, but you're a smart guy, Shel.
Joe
> [Original Message]
> From: jtainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 4/19/20
probably focusing screen. this is not uncommon with the D. for wide
open shots, AF is often much more accurate for me, my D backfocuses also
in manual focus. i need to get it aligned.
rg
Toine wrote:
I have noticed that many of my istD shots in manual focus are slightly
out of focus. The
On Apr 19, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
On Apr 19, 2006, at 4:35 PM, mike wilson wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm especially intri
Vic
PS. luckily there's no download version for screensaver or even desktop
background
You CAN right click to download the .gif and save it as a tiled
background... :-P
Tom C.
On Apr 19, 2006, at 4:40 PM, mike wilson wrote:
My brother in law has just had his access throttled by the
supplier. He was paying for unlimited use and they told him he was
using it too much...
I wonder how they define "unlimited".
Bob
Indeed not, if you happen to run your browser as a remote X-windows
client! It was very close to hang my pc.
If this isn't art, some people do have too much free time.
Groeten,
Vic
PS. luckily there's no download version for screensaver or even desktop
background
jtainter wrote:
and you
There you are again, :-)))
Saúde,
Manuel
-Mensagem original-
De: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada: quarta-feira, 19 de Abril de 2006 8:03
Para: pentax list
Assunto: Re: photography from an airplane and unsharp mask
On 18/4/06, Igor Roshchin, discombobulated, unleashed:
>1. Phot
I have noticed that many of my istD shots in manual focus are slightly
out of focus. The area in focus is "always" in the background of the
spot I focused on.
Now I'm wondering if I need to blame my eyes, the +/- slider of the
eyepiece, the mounting of the focusing screen, maybe the ccd
alignment??
Bob Shell wrote:
>On Apr 19, 2006, at 4:35 PM, mike wilson wrote:
>
>> Mark Roberts wrote:
>>
>>> Bob Shell wrote:
> Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
> On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> I'm especially intrigued by that "larg
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I've been quoted a price of $60/mo for HS access. That seems awfully high
to me. How does that compare with what you're paying?
Shel
£17.99 for 2Mb speed, 1Gb download limit per month. After that, it
reverts to 1Mb/unlimited.
My brother in law has just had his ac
On Apr 19, 2006, at 4:35 PM, mike wilson wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm especially intrigued by that "largely it is not potato",
since I
strongly suspected
On Apr 19, 2006, at 4:35 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
About $43 - Earthlink ISP through Time-Warner cable. $60 seems
kind of high unless it includes lots of useful bells and whistles.
SBC is offering DSL for $30 for the first year - don't know what it
bumps up to after that, but I doubt much
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm especially intrigued by that "largely it is not potato", since I
strongly suspected that :-)
You know, saying "largely it is not pota
She's got another, interesting website about excavating the WWII
defences around Kiev.
http://www.theserpentswall.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the girl on the motorcycle story is fiction.
-- Original message --
From: "Norman Baugher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
About $43 - Earthlink ISP through Time-Warner cable. $60 seems kind of
high unless it includes lots of useful bells and whistles. SBC is
offering DSL for $30 for the first year - don't know what it bumps up to
after that, but I doubt much higher than $40.
-P
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I
Of course, with a subject line like you've used, and the comments in your
message, it will be hard for most people not to evoke some curiosity and
visit the site.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: jtainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 4/19/2006 1:27:50 PM
> Subject: OT: Stay Away From Thi
It is mesmerizing, and you will find that you cannot get any work done.
http://www.newportharbor.us/computerworks.htm
I do have to wonder what kind of mind comes up with something like this.
Joe
On Apr 19, 2006, at 14:35, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I've been quoted a price of $60/mo for HS access. That seems
awfully high
to me. How does that compare with what you're paying?
DSL in Minneapolis: I'm paying about $24/month for the DSL signal
(from QWEST) and would pay an additional $1
Cory,
Where @ that price?
Collin
For SBC/Yahoo DSL I'm paying $14.99/month.
Speed is adequate, except for my sons who like to download
Simpsons episodes.
In rural western Oklahoma the phone co. wants to charge $50 or so
per month for DSL. And only 768K at that.
Friend
I pay $34 Can/Month, thats with taxes. One time fee of $130 to buy their modem.
Its only phone DSL but its really fast.
Your quote sounds high.
Dave
> I'm paying $26 CDN/month for DSL. $60 US
seems nuts.
>
> -Aaron
>
> -Original Message-
>
> From:
I'm paying $26 CDN/month for DSL. $60 US seems nuts.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj: High Speed Internet Access
Date: Wed Apr 19, 2006 3:35 pm
Size: 139 bytes
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
I've been quoted a price of $60/mo for HS access.
Unfortunately, both of those would require a PC and a USB 2.0 port -- I know
for a fact that my card-to-computer data rate is far slower than the
camera-to-card rate.'
I guess I could record the shutter sound and measure the fps once the buffer is
filled -- to time how fast the buffer empties.
I've been quoted a price of $60/mo for HS access. That seems awfully high
to me. How does that compare with what you're paying?
Shel
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 02:03:14PM -0400, Bob Shell wrote:
>
> On Apr 19, 2006, at 12:30 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> >Bob Shell wrote:
> >
> >>>Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
> >>>On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> I'm especially intrigu
mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Big potato or (being Pentax) small potato?
There's a popular saying here that goes like: "The most stupid peasants
have the biggest potatoes."
So, small potatoes, rather. We know who the stupid peasants are. ;-)
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG
As always with emerging technologies, it's best to stay one jump behind the
bleeding edge for maximum compatibility and best performance per dollar.
Memory cards are a commodity purchase, it makes sense to simply get the best
bang for the buck and eschew always wanting the latest, biggest, faste
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Shell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 April 2006 16:39
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Pentax info in Japanese
>
>
>
> > Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
> > On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
http://www.hdtune.com/
or
http://www.simplisoftware.com/Public/index.php?request=HdTach
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Aaron Reynolds
> I have both a cheapie Kingston 1GB SD card and a 133x Kingston 1GB card
> -- the 133x is very obviously faster by a really significant amount in
> the D
On Apr 19, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The DS2 and DL/DL2 models supposedly write faster and can utilize a
133x card's capabilities, but I haven't seen proof of that yet.
I have both a cheapie Kingston 1GB SD card and a 133x Kingston 1GB card
-- the 133x is very obviously faste
On Apr 19, 2006, at 12:30 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm especially intrigued by that "largely it is not potato",
since I
strongly suspected that :-)
You know,
Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And one more thing -
> Russian Pentax rep was saying something about USM lenses to be shown
> on Photokina
>From this month's French magazine "Réponses Photo"...
| "Des rumeurs disent aussi que Pentax passerait à la motorisation
| interne de ses
Yes, the girl on the motorcycle story is fiction.
-- Original message --
From: "Norman Baugher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Didn't this turn out to be bogus?
> Norm
>
> From: "Igor Roshchin"
>
> > Here is a web site that I found very interesting and without
> > sen
I see so little difference between 60x and 80x cards in the DS that
it would be hard to imagine anything faster as being of significant
consequence with regards to write speed. The DS2 and DL/DL2 models
supposedly write faster and can utilize a 133x card's capabilities,
but I haven't seen p
Switching between 512M, 1G and 2G Sandisk Ultra II SD cards in the
DS doesn't seem to change the 'power on to ready' time at all that I
can detect. I don't have a 4G card to try so I can't report on that.
Godfrey
On Apr 19, 2006, at 10:16 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
The D is quite a sluggar
Well, sort of. The backstory about speeding through on a
motorcycle without official permission was discredited.
As such, I'd be inclined to view the whole site with more
than a little suspicion. But the images are eye-grabbing.
Claiming the site to be free of pretentiousness and/or
sensational
Didn't this turn out to be bogus?
Norm
From: "Igor Roshchin"
Here is a web site that I found very interesting and without
sensational trends and/or pretentiousness very often present in the
news publications.
"Ghost Town" at
http://www.angelfire.com/extreme4/kiddofspeed/
or
http://elenafilat
The D is quite a sluggard in some respects when compared to the DS and the
DS2. It's not surprising that it would boot slower. It would be something
to watch out for, though. Good point.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: jtainter
>Shel, a 4 GB CF card causes my D to boot up noticeably slow
Actually, I agree with you. I'm satisfied with the 1GB cards, although I
can see getting a 2GB card for a number of reasons. I mostly asked about
the 4GB card for a friend who recently bought a DS, but possibly for my own
consideration as well.. My next card purchase will probably be a 2GB card
Shel, a 4 GB CF card causes my D to boot up noticeably slowly. For this reason
my 4 GB Lexar card gets used only when all other cards are full. I don't know
whether the DS and an SD card will also have this problem.
Joe
Replies embedded:
Hello, list-
IÂve seen some recent discussion on the list about some of the Tokina 400mm
telephotos but have only caught a few of the messages (I usually follow the
list via the archive which only seems to archive a small percentage of the
messages for some reason), so I apo
> As always with emerging technologies, it's best to stay one jump
> behind the bleeding edge for maximum compatibility and best
> performance per dollar.
As always with bleeding edge technologies, it's best to stay one jump
behind the edge for minimum bleeding...
Fred
Bob Shell wrote:
>> Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
>> On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm especially intrigued by that "largely it is not potato", since I
>>> strongly suspected that :-)
>
>You know, saying "largely it is not potato" probab
I recall seeing some discussion on DPReview.com regarding 4Gbyte
cards. Some folks have not had any problems with some makes, some
folks haven't been able to get them to work. File system doesn't seem
to be the problem as firmware v2.0 implements FAT32 already.
Evidently, there are controll
Here is a web site that I found very interesting and without
sensational trends and/or pretentiousness very often present in the
news publications.
"Ghost Town" at
http://www.angelfire.com/extreme4/kiddofspeed/
or
http://elenafilatova.com
Unfortunately, angelfire is rather slow, and sometimes
t
Honestly I didn't understand what you (or babelfish?) meant.
On 4/17/06, Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm especially intrigued by that "largely it is not potato", since I
strongly suspected that :-)
Dario
You know, saying "largely it is not potato" probably should be "for
th
Yes, Dario - that much I knew from updating the original to v1.02.
However, at that time there were no, or very few, SD cards with a capacity
greater than 2GB, hence my question. I don't want to buy a 4GB card only
to find it doesn't work or work properly. I was hoping that someone who
actually
DS firmware v.1.2 allows SD cards greater than 1GB (how much greater is
unknown).
v.2.0 also includes all v.1.2 features.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 4:17 PM
Subject: Supported SD Cards for istDS
Will th
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
