Op Fri, 07 Jul 2006 05:34:38 +0200 schreef j <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What would be the best program for building a web page of photos to
> put online ? Could either be mac or pc.
> I know I asked this before but I had lost some emails...Ann asked me
> once before if I had a link to share with my ph
On Jul 7, 2006, at 7:32 AM, Bob W wrote:
> It's a very interesting process - you don't even need a calibrated
> monitor, or a colour monitor even. Just by picking the brightest white
> where you want to hold detail, and the darkest black ditto, then
> setting them to some combination of CMYK (in t
On Jul 7, 2006, at 7:50 AM, John Francis wrote:
> I guess this just goes to show that it's hard to come up with
> a display presentation that satisfies everybody.
I think you're underestimating a bit...
* It needs to look presentable, obviously.
* It shouldn't distract from the photos as they ar
On Jul 7, 2006, at 6:06 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> I'm not a fan of the "vertical or horizontal scrolling thumbnail list
> next to individual image display" concept, however.
FWIW I don't mind it, as long as it's not too distracting and doesn't
contain too many thumbnails. I struggled a lot
On Jul 6, 2006, at 11:59 PM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
>> Good lord, how can any competent software designer in 2006 write a
>> web
>> page generator that requires JavaScript simply to display images???
>
> Are you sure they wrote it in 2006?
IMO it shouldn't matter which year they wrote it i
I use BreezeBrowser for my galleries. Very quick and easy and allows
nice template oriented customizations.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, July 6, 2006, 8:34:38 PM, you wrote:
j> What would be the best program for building a web page of photos to
j> put online ? Could either be mac or pc.
j
On Jul 6, 2006, at 8:19 PM, Keith McGuinness wrote:
> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>> Extending ISO by manipulating the RAW data alone will not do as well
>> as exposing properly at a higher ISO setting.
>
> Is *that* what this thread is about?
> I would have thought that this should be obvious!
Uh h
I can think of four off-hand that would do a great job of building a
web page photo gallery
Photoshop
Photoshop Elements
iView MediaPro *
JBuilder
* This is the one I use to generate thumbnail galleries. I then take
its HTML output and embed it into the pages I wrote in HTML.
Godfrey
On Jul
I am now looking for a Pentax A 1.4X-S teleconverter. I would be
possibly interested in a Pentax F 1.7X AF teleconverter although I
would prefer the former. Any leads? Thanks.
Bryan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I've got this old manual-focus 28mm "A" that I bought about a year
ago...
I thought it would be a good one to have around but I realize that
while I liked the fixed-focus 28mm lens on film, it's just "not my
style" on digital with the 1.5 crop factor.
I don't really know what it's worth now
Hi Tom, Bob ...
There are many ways to achieve a specific result in Photoshop, rarely a
"best way" - that's one of the things that makes it, to me at least, such
a neat program.
BTW, I asked about the color cast not only here, but on the Photoshop
mailing list and on theAdobe Photoshop User-to-U
Amita Guha wrote:
>
> On 7/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is an excellent lens by the way. All the pictures of Grace that I've
> > posted recently were shot with this lens. I'm very fond of it and use it
> > extensively.
> > Paul
>
> I've been happy with mine as wel
What would be the best program for building a web page of photos to
put online ? Could either be mac or pc.
I know I asked this before but I had lost some emails...Ann asked me
once before if I had a link to share with my photos, which I did not
and do not at this time. I think it is about time
In a message dated 7/6/2006 9:36:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My experiences with Velvia have never been
good. Since the only thing I was doing with slides was to scan them,
I was never able to get satisfactory scans from the Velvia. Either it
was too dense for my scann
I've tweaked this image as well and put it where the original was. The
details in the covered bridge rafters is much better now.
P. J. Alling wrote:
>I'm not sure I really like this little photo, but I'm sharing it
>anyway. I hope to get some feedback on it so here it is.
>
>http://www.mindsp
In a message dated 7/5/2006 11:57:18 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know you have worked on stuff like this before. This is pretty
good. It gives a sense of who she might be. It causes me to look at
things that could be associated with her and her thoughts.
With it all,
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Extending ISO by manipulating the RAW data alone will not do as well
> as exposing properly at a higher ISO setting.
Is *that* what this thread is about?
I would have thought that this should be obvious!
(I've been reading the thread but not always following it.)
Kei
In a message dated 7/5/2006 1:46:36 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not sure I really like this little photo, but I'm sharing it
anyway. I hope to get some feedback on it so here it is.
http://www.mindspring.com/~megazip/PESO_--_untitledvi.html
Technical Info:
Pentax *i
In a message dated 7/4/2006 8:28:52 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These days I spend much of my time with my granddaughter Grace. She
calls me papa. When I walk in the door she says, "go by by papa." That
means she wants to go out in the garden with me. We throw a ball and
Hello PDML,
Have anyone tried this ultra-wide baby on your film camera?
I have.
http://www.dojarek.com/da1224/pentax_12_24_on_film_body.html
Now I love it even more.
Regards,
Jerry
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 7/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is an excellent lens by the way. All the pictures of Grace that I've
> posted recently were shot with this lens. I'm very fond of it and use it
> extensively.
> Paul
I've been happy with mine as well, since I finally got a good copy.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
>
> Thanks for all the comments and the good criticisms. Much
> appreciated.
>
> I was never really very happy with this photo, although I
> couldn't fully
> explain why.
>
> Shel
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>On Jul 6, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
>
>
>
>> (the confusion as to the Silvertone and
>>Rollei Classic origin with respect to APX increases every day).
>>
>>
>
>Really? What do you need to know about it?
>
>
Is it current production, from Agfa Gevaert (Who r
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff"
Subject: Color Cast Question
> Does this pic have a bluish cast to it?
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/sunrabrunch.html
Yup.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.n
On 7/7/06, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How would a color negative exhibiting a bluish cast be corrected when
> printing??? Rhetorical question.
I was taught to subtract the cast or add the complementary colour.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
On Jul 6, 2006, at 3:35 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
> (the confusion as to the Silvertone and
> Rollei Classic origin with respect to APX increases every day).
Really? What do you need to know about it?
For film recommendations, my gigantic freezer stock is mainly three
films:
Fuji NPZ 800 -- I se
frank theriault wrote:
>On 7/6/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Well it's not so much that I want to *say* anything so much as,
>> well... you know...impress hot babes and stuff...
>
>Your honesty impresses me.
>
>cheers,
>frank
>
>ps: All kidding aside, that's one beautiful phot
On Jul 6, 2006, at 3:23 PM, Bob W wrote:
> ... The problem for colourblind people,
> though, is that something that looks ok to us can look absurd to other
> people. "Why is the sky yellow, Bob?". When the intention is to show
> something as realistically as possible then colourblind people have
>
> > ... No doubt there are drawbacks to this technique, but it seems
> > like a
> > reasonably good way of getting an objective answer to your
question,
> > and a more balanced approach than applying a quick fix filter. ...
>
> Yes, setting color values by number actually does work well,
>
Hello Jack,
This was Snap Photo and Imaging - their digital side is going very
strong, just film processing is way down.
Ignoring the walk in business that individuals have, I suspect the
labs are at the mercy of their clientele. Snap does a large portion
of the sports teams pictures - that is f
> How would a color negative exhibiting a bluish cast be corrected when
> printing??? Rhetorical question.
Whether it's rhetorical or not, WillieR can answer this more
precisely than I, but I expect you would add a little magenta and
subtract some cyan in the filter pack. Negative printing to
At 2:03 PM -0700 7/6/06, Bruce Dayton wrote:
>I just got back from my lab picking up some wedding proofs. This is a
>lab that has done most of it's work with professionals - team sports,
>weddings, portraits, etc. They do some retail business
>(individuals), but not much.
>
>While there, I talke
Bruce,
Because I use Sacramento film labs, I'm curious as to which lab you
questioned.
Awhile back (maybe two months ago) Cali-Color said their film scanning
and digital file printing were holding strong. Didn't ask about film
drop-off for processing. That, more than likely, is being done by
Mini-l
I just got back from my lab picking up some wedding proofs. This is a
lab that has done most of it's work with professionals - team sports,
weddings, portraits, etc. They do some retail business (individuals), but not
much.
While there, I talked with one of the longtime employees. I asked him
We are probably having a "tangential conversation". :-)
I was referring to a traditional print. The enlarger has filters for the
light source that affect the color balance of the light that reaches the
negative.
My point is that traditionally a filtering mechanism is used either at image
capt
Back when I still shot film I had settled on Kodak's Portra UC. It
was touted to have been developed to scan well. My experience with
the color was very good. It was one of the few films that did a good
job on both skin tones and vivid colors.
The brighter colors were well saturated, but not to
>
> How would a color negative exhibiting a bluish cast be corrected
when
> printing??? Rhetorical question.
>
>
> Tom C.
>
Rhetorical answer:
Do you mean a digital print or a traditional print? I know absolutely
nothing about traditional colour printing, and probably never will.
For digita
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Adam Maas wrote:
> Yep, that's almost velvia-ish saturation from the Ultra Color. I don't
> touch the stuff, if I want ungodly saturation, I shoot E100VS or Velvia
> chromes.
I'm lazy, and chromes require extra work for my little amatuer self.
I'm gonna have to pick me up a
Too late.
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>frank theriault wrote:
>
>
>>On 7/1/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
>>>Taken three years ago. Still one of my favorite mountain shots.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>What are you trying to say with this photo?
>>
gfen wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Adam Maas wrote:
>
>>Plus-X is still available, but can be hard to find. Tri-X will likely
>>outlast every other Kodak B&W film. Tri-X is my do-everything film, I
>>shoot it from EI 200-6400 on a regular basis.
>
>
> I knew they killed it in sheet format a few
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Russell Kerstetter
> Sent: 06 July 2006 20:33
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: PESO-- Lady Evelyn Falls, Northwest Territories
>
> i like Bruce's observation about the pattern from the dif
Hi,
I don't find the colors clowny or offensive in the Ultra Color
linethey just seem to pop without rendering skin tones
offensivelygreat for shooting photos of family/friends outside.
I like it.
Robert
gfen wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Adam Maas wrote:
>
>> Plus-X is still avai
Hi Bob,
I find that it's often the results that count, not the process. Somebody
very technically adept with Photoshop for instance may do a 3-step process
to make a correction and might indeed have a good reason for doing so. If I
use a quicker route to achieve the desired effect or correcti
On 7/6/06, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't encourage him by replying , Mark :)
To late.
Nyaa nya nya na na na...
cheers,
frank, feeling cheeky today
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.n
On Jul 6, 2006, at 12:50 PM, John Francis wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:06:00AM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>>
>> I'm not a fan of the "vertical or horizontal scrolling thumbnail list
>> next to individual image display" concept, however. It always feels
>> crowded to me. I'd rather see
frank theriault wrote:
>
> On 7/1/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
> > Taken three years ago. Still one of my favorite mountain shots.
> >
>
> What are you trying to say with this photo?
>
> cheers,
> frank
>
Don't encourage him by replying ,
On 7/6/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well it's not so much that I want to *say* anything so much as,
> well... you know...impress hot babes and stuff...
Your honesty impresses me.
cheers,
frank
ps: All kidding aside, that's one beautiful photo. For me it's
beyond analysis; i
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Adam Maas wrote:
> Plus-X is still available, but can be hard to find. Tri-X will likely
> outlast every other Kodak B&W film. Tri-X is my do-everything film, I
> shoot it from EI 200-6400 on a regular basis.
I knew they killed it in sheet format a few years back, I assumed r
frank theriault wrote:
>On 7/1/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
>> Taken three years ago. Still one of my favorite mountain shots.
>>
>
>What are you trying to say with this photo?
Well it's not so much that I want to *say* anything so much as,
we
On Jul 6, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Steve Sharpe wrote:
> At 2:59 PM -0400 7/6/06, gfen wrote:
>> On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Adam Maas wrote:
>>> Fuji Acros, Kodak Tri-X, Ilford PanF+.
>>
>> I'm a little out of touch, as I've been living off of frozen
>> stockpiles in
>> 35mm film and don't really shoot it o
On Jul 6, 2006, at 12:32 PM, Bob W wrote:
> ... No doubt there are drawbacks to this technique, but it seems
> like a
> reasonably good way of getting an objective answer to your question,
> and a more balanced approach than applying a quick fix filter. ...
Yes, setting color values by number
Mike,
Fuji Reala (100)
Fuji 160S (160)--formerly NPS
Fuji 400H (400)--formerly NPH
Kodak High Definition 200 or 400
Kodak Ultra 100 or 400
Kodak Portra 160NC, 160VC, 400NC, 400VC
Kodak Portra UC400
Kodak color process 400 Black and White
Kodak Tri-X Pan 400
The choices are narrowing. I usually
Somewhat tight perhaps. I climbed a fence next to a "No Trespassing"
sign and did a ~nervous~ one shot take. This is all I got.
Thanks for all comments.
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 6, 2006, at 8:02 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> > http://photolightimages.com/aspu
On Jul 6, 2006, at 12:14 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
> Yes and no. You (or was that someone else?) were also talking about
> understanding the limitations of the equipment, and when you want
> to do
> that, you should always try to see the full picture.
I'm sorry, but there's a difference between tr
On 7/1/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
> Taken three years ago. Still one of my favorite mountain shots.
>
What are you trying to say with this photo?
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-
> On 7/5/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> > Now *there's* one for the quotes file!
> > ...not.
>
>
> You're clearly in on the "let's get frank" conspiracy.
>
> Duly noted...
>
There couldn't be a conspiracy.
It's Frank's world, we just live in it. (Dean Martin)
Bob
--
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:06:00AM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> I'm not a fan of the "vertical or horizontal scrolling thumbnail list
> next to individual image display" concept, however. It always feels
> crowded to me. I'd rather see a page of thumbnails and be able to
> click on one
At 2:59 PM -0400 7/6/06, gfen wrote:
>On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Adam Maas wrote:
>> Fuji Acros, Kodak Tri-X, Ilford PanF+.
>
>I'm a little out of touch, as I've been living off of frozen stockpiles in
>35mm film and don't really shoot it often anymore.
>
>In B&W, from Kodak, I used Tri X for high speed
gfen wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Adam Maas wrote:
>
>>Fuji Acros, Kodak Tri-X, Ilford PanF+.
>
>
> I'm a little out of touch, as I've been living off of frozen stockpiles in
> 35mm film and don't really shoot it often anymore.
>
> In B&W, from Kodak, I used Tri X for high speed and Plus X for
This is an interesting thread for me, and an interesting reply from
Tom. I have been mulling whether to ask something about colour
correction, but I can't readily formulate a question at the moment.
As you know, I am going to buy a new printer soon, and intend to use a
fully colour-managed workflo
nice pic, it is interesting to stare at
having grown up in the city I know enough to know that I don't know
what it is (other than a farm implement)
russell
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
The Kodak professional colour neg films are very good, readily
obtainable, and scan well. I use Tri-X for b&w. It seems to scan
alright, but I've haven't invested much time in improving my scanning
skills, so it can probably be done a lot better than I do it.
7dayshop sells both at a good price. O
i like all the details. run down bilding are always interesting to me
becaues of all the junk sitting around to add to the picture
russell
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
i like Bruce's observation about the pattern from the different
layers. it is a nice compostion
russell
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> I was talking about the number of different voltage levels that may be
>> output from the sensor itself. [ ... ]
>>
>
> I've thought about it for long enough ... a year or two ago.
>
> There's no point in considering the A/D conversion as separate from
> the sensor *because you can't do
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Adam Maas wrote:
> Fuji Acros, Kodak Tri-X, Ilford PanF+.
I'm a little out of touch, as I've been living off of frozen stockpiles in
35mm film and don't really shoot it often anymore.
In B&W, from Kodak, I used Tri X for high speed and Plus X for low speed
film. I'm unsure i
On 7/5/06, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This was going to be my contribution to the PUG, taken almost a month
> ago. However not only did I forget the due date, I forgot that I had
> the file. It's a B&W conversion which I find has great promise.
> Hopefully you all will agree.
>
> h
Fuji Acros, Kodak Tri-X, Ilford PanF+.
Way cheaper to develop than any colour film. Of ocurse, you will end up
having to do it yourself ;-)
If you need to run it through a minilab, go with Ilford XP2
-Adam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Now that I have a scanner capable of good film scans, I'd li
On Jul 6, 2006, at 8:02 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=118
Lovely imaging, subtle colors and textures. I'd have liked to see
just a little more in the composition, but it's nice as is.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http:/
Hey, I read these posts in order. At least I didn't suggest it was
underexposed...
Tom C wrote:
>He did later you dork! Sheesh! :-)
>
>
>
>Tom C.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>Subject: Re: PES
On 7/6/06, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Humm, it's not often I'm compared to René Magritte...
You say that like it's a good thing...
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/ma
Fuji Reala..or Superia. 100 ISO!
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Now that I have a scanner capable of good film scans, I'd like to
> begin
> shooting more film. I've mostly used Fujifilm Superia 200/400
> because it
> was about the only film available to me, aside from some Kodak. Any
> su
"P. J. Alling" wrote:
>
> I'm sorely tempted by the 50-200 for it's size and weight, but right now
> I really need something in the wide end of the lens universe.
> Much the same as I'd love to have the A 35-105 f3.5, but I've decided
> it's not really in my budget.
> (Unfortunately something in t
Maybe a little, but it's pretty clean on my monitor. Less cast than
you'd find in an old Ektachrome slide
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>Does this pic have a bluish cast to it?
>
>http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/sunrabrunch.html
>
>
>Shel
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Humm, it's not often I'm compared to René Magritte...
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>On Jul 6, 2006, at 8:53 AM, frank theriault wrote:
>
>
>
>>On 7/5/06, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I'm not sure I really like this little photo, but I'm sharing it
>>>anyway. I hope to get s
Hello mike,
You didn't tell use what kind of subjects. There are many types of
films designed for specific uses. High or low contrast, punchy color
or subtle color, good skin tones for example.
I used several different films when I was shooting the stuff. For
people shots either Kodak Portra o
I really hate to agree with Godfrey sometimes, especially when he's
being pedantic. But this is so obvious that it's hard to understand why
anyone is left arguing.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>On Jul 5, 2006, at 11:41 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
>
>
>
>>I was talking about the number of different vol
No, I don't plan a "leveling" change. As it happens, I'm now
comfortable with the current perspective. Wide angle distortion was
what I was describing by referencing the FOV.
I can image a hundred Summer evenings of quiet conversation
interspersed by frequent quiet laughter. A happy image, as someo
I'm sorely tempted by the 50-200 for it's size and weight, but right now
I really need something in the wide end of the lens universe.
Much the same as I'd love to have the A 35-105 f3.5, but I've decided
it's not really in my budget.
(Unfortunately something in the 10-24mm range isn't in my budg
Nice composition, but the sky is very unrealistic, (velvia you say?)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>My first successful slide scan with my new Epson 4490 scanner. Originally
>>taken with my MZ-6 on Velvia.
>>
>>Tips? Suggestions?
>>
>>Thanks!
>>
>>
>
>Uh.
>
>http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/?p=122
It's been four years since I shot any film. If you're going to shoot
traditional process B&W film, process it yourself to provide the best
possible negatives for scanning and reduce costs.
My favorite B&W films as of the last of my 35mm shooting are
Agfa APX25 (EI 50 in XTOL 1:1) *
Kod
If you can get it, my all around favorite color negative film is Fuji Reala.
http://fujifilm.com/products/consumer_film/superia_reala.html
Tom C.
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: pdml@pdml.net
>Subject: Film recommendations?
>Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 11:02:5
Eric Featherstone wrote:
> On 06/07/06, Toralf Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Toralf Lund wrote:
>>
>>> Eric Featherstone wrote:
>>>
On 06/07/06, Toralf Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was talking about the number of different voltage levels that may
Thanks, all. I'll take to heart your suggestions and tone down that sky a
bit. I have only used Velvia twice, and I'm not super impressed with what
I see. I have yet to scan any negative film.
Mike
> Hello mike,
>
> What I like is the patterns I see in this composition. It is sort of
> like l
Hi Shel,
It focuses to 1.1 meter, quite close for that long a lens. At 200mm that can
give you some near macro capability. Of course the barrel extends quite a bit
at 200. I haven't noticed how much it extends when focusing, so it must not be
an unusually large amount. The lens is extremely ligh
He did later you dork! Sheesh! :-)
Tom C.
>From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: PESO-- Lady Evelyn Falls, Northwest Territories
>Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 14:18:45 -0400
>
>Include the URL.
>
>[EMAIL PROTECT
Include the URL.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>My first successful slide scan with my new Epson 4490 scanner. Originally
>taken with my MZ-6 on Velvia.
>
>Tips? Suggestions?
>
>Thanks!
>
>Mike
>
>
>
>
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
--
PDML P
On Jul 6, 2006, at 7:36 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>> http://www.wvlphotography.com/children/index.html
>
> I know Bill personally, and I know when his web site was designed
> and put
> together. It was just a few weeks ago. However, within the
> framework of
> the site, he's using Porta to p
Now that I have a scanner capable of good film scans, I'd like to begin
shooting more film. I've mostly used Fujifilm Superia 200/400 because it
was about the only film available to me, aside from some Kodak. Any
suggestions for some good 35mm film? I prefer negative film because slide
film is e
Looks OK to me - on a monitor calibrated with a Spyder about 3 days ago
-P
Don Williams wrote:
> I've just reset my screen with Adobe and I think the picture looks fine.
> No perceivable cast.
>
> Don W
>
> Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
>> On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>>
>>
>>> D
On Jul 6, 2006, at 9:02 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Does this pic have a bluish cast to it?
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/sunrabrunch.html
Yes. It has a slight bluish cast to my eye on my calibrated monitor,
and Photoshop's analysis tools allow me to see the blue in the
highlights (
On 7/5/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now *there's* one for the quotes file!
> ...not.
You're clearly in on the "let's get frank" conspiracy.
Duly noted...
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@p
Paul,
How close will it focus? Does it extend on close focusing like the 16~45?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This is an excellent lens by the way. All the pictures of Grace that
> I've posted recently were shot with this lens. I'm very fond of it and
> use it e
mike wilson wrote:
>snip<
>It's almost as if an invisible firewall suddenly starts to function. Zone
>Alarm is uninstalled at the moment, as it was causing me difficulties with the
>network.
>
>Is anyone less baffled than I am about this?
Let me know what you find: I have a client who has a si
On Jul 6, 2006, at 8:53 AM, frank theriault wrote:
> On 7/5/06, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm not sure I really like this little photo, but I'm sharing it
>> anyway. I hope to get some feedback on it so here it is.
>>
>> http://www.mindspring.com/~megazip/PESO_--_untitledvi.html
Jens Bladt wrote:
>
> While doing panoramas earlier today - at the beach - a young woman
> asked me:
> Why do you take pictures?
> Out of nowhere, I came upp with this (rather arrogant) answer:
> Because I'm a
> photographer.
> I expected her to give me problems or to follow up on the question
This is an excellent lens by the way. All the pictures of Grace that I've
posted recently were shot with this lens. I'm very fond of it and use it
extensively.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The 50-200 Zoom SMC Pentax DA - f
I like this as well. Very nice. It conveys the soft imagery that the title
suggests. The tilt is just wide-angle distortion. The horizon appears to be
correct based on the degree of tilt at each side of center, so it doesn't
bother me. In fact, it might enahnce it. It would be easy to correct th
I've just reset my screen with Adobe and I think the picture looks fine.
No perceivable cast.
Don W
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
>
>> Does this pic have a bluish cast to it?
>>
>> http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/sunrabrunch.html
>>
>
> I do
Hello Roman,
On the first shot - there is a white blob just to the side of her head
that is very distracting. The smoothness of the background in general
is nice and she does have a very nice smile. It would have been good
to step to the right just a bit to remove that blob.
The second shot doe
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
