On 15/09/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also I kind of suspect that there will be lots of similar cameras shown
at Photokina. That makes Pentax's lead time, what, two weeks?
Let's not go bursting the bubble Graywolf, I say the fun will start
when it finally ships. My prediction is that
On 15/09/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was over at the Adobe U2U DNG forum and came across this small thread:
http://tinyurl.com/lgy9o
http://www.adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@.3bc19bc8/0
Some of the comments brought a smile to my face, It's no big deal, just
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 15/09/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also I kind of suspect that there will be lots of similar cameras shown
at Photokina. That makes Pentax's lead time, what, two weeks?
Let's not go bursting the bubble Graywolf, I say the fun will start
when it
On 15/09/06, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gonz wrote:
Thats strange to me. Are there different versions of the camera?
Anybody else out there get 6 raw continuous?
I get six RAWs. Or maybe five. I'll have to check the archives and see
what the longest sequence I have is. I
On 15/09/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't know about intelligence but I bet it makes your wazoo look HUGE.
ROTFLMAO This has to be one of the funniest threads I've read here for
a while, what have you guys been smoking whilst I've been asleep? :-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE
On 15/09/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's certainly possible. Excatly what happened to Nikon with the D200,
although they solved it somewhat with the D80 (Which actually has some
stock floating around).
The price point they've chosen certainly created interest, I just hope
it
I got 6 just now! Mine's an earlyish version.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: K10D Buffer Size/Speed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NR off
There will be plenty available in Japan. The rest of us will have to
accept what ever trickle they allot. Nothing anyone says about Pentax's
marketing can be more negative than the reality, that has always been
their number one problem. It seems to be improving, but that is not
saying much at
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 15/09/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's certainly possible. Excatly what happened to Nikon with the D200,
although they solved it somewhat with the D80 (Which actually has some
stock floating around).
The price point they've chosen certainly
http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=2821944
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
http://www.brendemuehl.net
http://evangelicalperspective.blogspot.com
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
--
Kenneth Waller wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cotty wrote:
On 14/9/06, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
None. I leave the eggs to you mate.
Well, let's not beat it to death then.
I bet you had to scramble to come up with that one.
I can't wait to see what else this
Lawrence Kwan wrote:
There have been complaints about lack of AA battery power, and many felt
abandoned by Pentax engineers. But in fact, I don't think they have a
choice. K10D requires much higher voltage to run.
Nope. Voltage is a non-issue these days because single-chip switching
power
Then again, you might both be completely wrong. You offer this as
fact. But it's merely more negative conjecture. Let's save the
complaints until the problems occur. BH told me that they've been
promised a large shipment. Pentax may have been building cameras for
quite some time. Save the
Paul,
I agree with you 110% The camera hasn't even been seen at the show in its
final form, much less shipped, yet the nay-sayers are starting to appear.
Hey, complain if you've got something to complain about - I'm with you
100%. But to complain before the fact seems like just another form of
I got 6 just now! Mine's an earlyish version.
Yep, 6 here too (just tested).
Love, Light and Peace,
- Peter Loveday
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 15/09/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then again, you might both be completely wrong. You offer this as
fact. But it's merely more negative conjecture. Let's save the
complaints until the problems occur. BH told me that they've been
promised a large shipment. Pentax may have
You are negative like Tom, I don't give a @%#$.
G
is a smiley necessary? ...
On Sep 14, 2006, at 5:46 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 15/09/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also I kind of suspect that there will be lots of similar cameras
shown
at Photokina. That makes
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 15/09/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then again, you might both be completely wrong. You offer this as
fact. But it's merely more negative conjecture. Let's save the
complaints until the problems occur. BH told me that they've been
promised a large
On 15/09/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sheesh, for now take some pleasure and pride in what Pentax is trying to do
here, that the camera is ore a leader than anything Pentax has produced in
a long time, accept that the company may never really compete with Canon in
terms of
On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:44 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
Yet they can't supply sample images based on the suggestion that the
firmware is not yet finalized?
You said that. Pentax didn't.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Rob, you're a hoot. First you complain that the Pentax offerings
aren't good enough. Now, you're complaining that they're too good. HAR!
On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:48 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 15/09/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sheesh, for now take some pleasure and
On Sep 14, 2006, at 6:06 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
Don't know about intelligence but I bet it makes your wazoo look
HUGE.
ROTFLMAO This has to be one of the funniest threads I've read here for
a while, what have you guys been smoking whilst I've been asleep? :-)
good stuff,
Why worry? So you might have to wait a little bit to get one. What is
the big problem with that? People who ordered a Nikon D200 when it
was first released waited to receive their camera. Same for most any
hot new product.
A little less impatience, a little less worry would do your stress
I don't understand all the negativism and skepticism either.
Complaints about problems which exist only in speculation is really
stupid.
I'm quite excited about the new body: by the specs it has everything
I'd like. I'm sure I'll be able to deal with any minor issues that
come up with it.
On 15/09/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob, you're a hoot. First you complain that the Pentax offerings
aren't good enough. Now, you're complaining that they're too good. HAR!
I didn't say anything of the sort, look back in the archives, I simply
think that their price point is
Godfrey, Some people waited 3-4 months for the D200. It launched in
November and supply issues didn't end until July. The 18-200 is still
not readily available almost a year later.
That is a major issue.
-Adam
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Why worry? So you might have to wait a little bit to get
I paid much more as well for both of my D cameras, and I was
surprised at the price point. But if Pentax can meet the demand and
show a profit at that price, it's a tremendous achievement. I think
it's too soon to assume that they can't pull it off. Samsung might be
the key to this. Time
Yeah Rob.
For [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s sake, make up your mind.
Dave
At 11:05 AM 15/09/2006, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Rob, you're a hoot. First you complain that the Pentax offerings
aren't good enough. Now, you're complaining that they're too good. HAR!
On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:48 PM, Digital Image
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 14, 2006, at 3:05 PM, Gonz wrote:
Does Raw Shooter or the Adobe DNG convertor read K100D raw files? I
dont know if RAW formats have changed from the DS, DL, etc family of
cameras, and I need to look at some K100D RAW files I took from a
borrowed camera.
On 15/09/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I paid much more as well for both of my D cameras, and I was
surprised at the price point. But if Pentax can meet the demand and
show a profit at that price, it's a tremendous achievement. I think
Of course it doesn't bother me personally
On Sep 14, 2006, at 8:35 PM, Gonz wrote:
Does Raw Shooter or the Adobe DNG convertor read K100D raw files? I
dont know if RAW formats have changed from the DS, DL, etc family of
cameras, and I need to look at some K100D RAW files I took from a
borrowed camera.
Iridient Digital's RAW
John Celio wrote:
...
The K10D's screen is interchangeable, but it is not compatible with older
screens, in case anyone was wondering. It looked a teeny bit smaller than
the
screen in my D, but that could have been a proportional illusion (the D being
a
smaller camera and all).
...
She is. I spent an afternoon with Peter a couple-three years ago when I
was in the Brighton neighborhood, had a good long chat about how he got
into the camera/lens business (largely due to his frequent visits to
Japan with his wife).
Stan
On Sep 14, 2006, at 9:39 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis
It won't be set to 0.0, remember the meter will still be on and will
still be giving you a reading without aperture information. However the
shutter speed will now be set to give you the proper exposure, if you're
not outside the acceptable metering range.
J and K Messervy wrote:
I just
oct 13
best,
mishka
On 9/14/06, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ryan brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For fun, I added it to my cart and got a much earlier delivery date.
Such as?
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage:
The lighting may have changed slightly between the time you pressed the
button and the time you use the DOF for a reading. Another possibility
is that your lenses aperture blades are slow. This will give you a
shutter speed higher than expected as the lens will not be entirely
stopped down
Sheesh, Adam - none of this has happened yet. Why not worry or be
concerned when it happens - if it happens.
As some jamoke once said, Don't worry, be happy.
http://www.superlaugh.com/1/behappy.htm
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Adam Maas
Godfrey, Some people waited 3-4 months for the
PDML List Members:
I hope that I did this right...
I have been admiring the work that everyone has been posting on this
list. It has been both entertaining and inspiring. I am only an amateur
(sp?), but I'll go ahead and post these for comments. They are uncropped
and unaltered and the
if Pentax can meet the demand, if being the operative word here.
Pentax has created quite a stir with the K10D among people who wouldn't
normally give the brand a second glance. If all the hype over at dpreview
is to be believed, we may see quite a few migrations from Canon, Nikon Sony.
I
I was at a talk last night which centered on the work of George
Lawrence, one of the early innovators doing panorama photographs with
cameras lofted by kites, as well as other LARGE prints. Prints shown
were 6' wide on average, printed in sections. The US Library of
Congress include some
If you can afford the lens, you can certainly afford to have one custom
machined.
Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=2821944
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
http://www.brendemuehl.net
http://evangelicalperspective.blogspot.com
He is no fool who gives what he
G'day Mitch,
You've got some nice stuff there. The Sentinel has potential, but I find
the greenery distracting. I don't know if it would have been possible to
try framing the scene without it. I particularly like Early Morning Park
#3 Urban Sprawl those are really nice.
One other thing, the
The Pentax Japan K10D page is up (surprisingly being the last and one day
late). Most are what we already know, here are some extra info I found:
- Initial production is set at 13,000 per month
(better reserve your pre-order now!)
- Changeable Focusing screen is confirmed
(apparently not
Very nice. I like the sentinel the best of these.
Mitch Conant wrote:
PDML List Members:
I hope that I did this right...
I have been admiring the work that everyone has been posting on this
list. It has been both entertaining and inspiring. I am only an amateur
(sp?), but I'll go ahead and
Hi,
I was thinking about the 22 bit A/D converter and about the ISO
setting last night.
Then it struck me, right into the back of my head... :-)
It is simply ingenious (if this is what Pentax has done):
1) By utilizing a 22 bit A/D you get a wide dynamic range
2) When you have a wide dynamic
301 - 345 of 345 matches
Mail list logo
