I already stated that this assumes all other variables
are constant
Mark!
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of J. C. O'Connell
Sent: 11 November 2006 02:01
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: Using a Super
I do. In fact I don't need to focus at all using wide lenses. And my
longest manual glass is the most difficult to focus. Are you sure
you're not an arm chair photographer (nothing wrong with that). I
can't remember any pictures.
On 11/10/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I
Wow, some of these models are not discontinued yet! Good job Apple ;-)
Adam Maas a écrit :
Finaly some Pentax love for Aperture. The Update adds support for the
*istDS (And apparently the DL and D too according to the support list).
No K1x0D support yet though.
-Adam
--
PDML
Darwin awards are for removing your DNA from the gene pool. It may be that
the effects of the blast in that general (or do I mean genital) area may
have done that anyway.
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Q. What do you call a geordie in a suit?
A. The accused
Peter
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: OT - One for the Darwin Awards...
I can assure you that nobody in
I may be way behind here, but there is also a K10D manual posted there as
well!!!
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Manuel Magalhães [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 7:19 PM
Subject: RE: New K10D brochure
Thanks Pedro,
On 11.11.2006, at 04:38 , Adam Maas wrote:
Finaly some Pentax love for Aperture. The Update adds support for the
*istDS (And apparently the DL and D too according to the support
list).
No K1x0D support yet though.
Dl and D were supported in prevoius versions of Aperture (Dl from
version
I very often use an old Metz 32 Z-2 flash on my *idt D. In TTL mode.
I recently disovered, that if I slide back the flash slightly - in the flash
shoe - a couple of milimeters - I get P-TTL !
The flash will execute a pre-flash, leading to slightly better/more accurate
exposueres!
The first time I
Very strange! I will test that with my 40MZ2.
What SCA adapter do you use ?
I use 3701.
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Buy the DFA. DFA are full frame lenses.
You will want to avoid DA but DFA are fine.
2006/11/10, Eziocapo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello Pentaxians,
I'm waiting, since two months ago, for one Pentax FA 50mm f/2.8 Macro,
not the DFA.
I'm yet lover of film photography and I've a lot of film Pentax
IMO they may have rushed out a bit, being quite a bit on the edge
for their own survival.
What about an R10?
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
My 4GB Microdrive works fine :)
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
...to report that the introduction of the K10D in Germany, initlally
planned for mid-november, has been reported to the end of the month.
They have a Pentax road-show in the store, so he got the info straight
from the source.
The weather here is a disgrace, so I'm only very mildly tempted to go
Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...to report that the introduction of the K10D in Germany, initlally
planned for mid-november, has been reported...
reported? Make that postponed. That's what happens when you write an
English posting while you're sitting in Germany and listening
Sorry - I seem to have had the red eye recudtion on by mistake :-(.
Anyway, the shots turned out fine :-)
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens
Bladt
Quoting Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 10/11/06, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
As he was dialing, we all yelled, No, Norm, don't do it! It's so
very early in the morning in England, you'll disturb our good friend
Cotty from his sleep. Please, for the Love of God, don't do it,
LOL ;)
2006/11/11, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...to report that the introduction of the K10D in Germany, initlally
planned for mid-november, has been reported...
reported? Make that postponed. That's what happens when you write an
Hi
I've been absent from the list for quite some time, it's been a difficult
year with all manner and kind of troubles for me including breaking my
collarbone in a motorcycle accident.
I've finally decided to go digital and plan to purchase a K10D sometime in
the new year. In the meantime I'd
:) Well maybe red eye reduction does improve flash accuracy then?
It would be funny lol
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
For USA members only.
Epson lost a class action lawsuit over their ink cartridges. The
court ordered them to make restitution to all registered owners of
their printers. Forms were sent out to all registered owners.
I received two of the forms, filled them out, and mailed them in.
This
Hi John,
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:01:17 +0100, John Whittingham wrote:
I've been absent from the list for quite some time, it's been a difficult
year with all manner and kind of troubles for me including breaking my
collarbone in a motorcycle accident.
Sorry to hear that ...
I've finally
You are confusing depth of field with accurate focus.
If you dont care about the depth of field and all
you care about is if your subject falls SOMEWHERE
in the depth of field you might have a point, but
most photographer focus on a specific distance
even with high depth of field condtions to
The fellow who had my daughters D on trial liked the camera, but did
not like the no battery thing.
Seems for him it would take several attempts to turn on and get a full
battery icon.
I asked my daughter about that, and she said it was doiing it for her
lately, but failed to mention it to
On 11/11/06, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
For a few $$'s i'll start snoring and set up a diversion.:-)
I've heard that you're cheaper than that.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Toine wrote:
Are you sure you're not an arm chair photographer (nothing wrong with that).
Not armchairs, swimming pools.
--
Christian
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
It happens when the batteries are almost dead or if you have uneven
cells. Put four new AA lithiums in it, and it should work fine.
Paul
On Nov 11, 2006, at 8:56 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
The fellow who had my daughters D on trial liked the camera, but did
not like the no battery thing.
Hello John,
Good luck for a better year to come!
Regards SD cards, I've been using Sandisk Ultra II (60x) 1G 2G and
Transcend 150x 2G cards for the past couple of years with no problems
at all. The Transcend 150x 2G cards are much less expensive (around
$40 at NewEgg.com).
On the remote
Oh yes: I forgot to add about the battery.
It has been confirmed by three separate, reliable sources that the
Pentax K10D uses a 1700 mah version of the NP-400 Li-Ion battery used
in the Konica Minolta A2 and other cameras. This is a good battery,
and is easily available in 1500, 1700 and
Hi,
I see you've gotten a couple of responses, and I'd pretty much echo those.
For the most part, it almost doesn't matter what brand of SD card you get,
although I'd suggest sticking with those that have been mentioned here
since they are proven cards. Lexar is good but pricey, as is Kingston,
Ouch! I know that one, having done the same thing while riding (actually,
while falling) from a mountain bike. Glad to know that you're mending.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: John Whittingham
I've been absent from the list for quite some time, it's been a difficult
year with all manner
Actually, they all are discontinued. The K100D and K110D are the current
models.
-Adam
Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail) wrote:
Wow, some of these models are not discontinued yet! Good job Apple ;-)
Adam Maas a écrit :
Finaly some Pentax love for Aperture. The Update adds support for the
*istDS
I have only seen five photos from you, maybe six. You've made almost no
contributions to this list wrt photos, and those that you have posted have
been described by you as test photos. Since you have provided almost no
record of your work, your comments about what lenses work best are, at
least
Thats what i thought Paul.
I have brand new Energizer liths in there now.
Maybe, 50 shots on them.
Dave
Quoting Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It happens when the batteries are almost dead or if you have uneven
cells. Put four new AA lithiums in it, and it should work fine.
Paul
On Nov
Quoting Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/11/06, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
For a few $$'s i'll start snoring and set up a diversion.:-)
I've heard that you're cheaper than that.
Stupid exchange rates...
Dave
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
Bob -
Did you register the printers with Epson as well as submit the claim
forms? It seems that has to be done as a separate item. Any printers
purchased within the claim time frame have until Nov 13 to register on
the Epson site. The Settlement FAQ page has a link to Epson for
On Nov 11, 2006, at 7:20 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
... I'd look at the NP-400 battery for the Minolta as a good choice
for
replacing the proprietary battery for the Pentax. It's been
reported that
it's the same battery. ...
Not to pick on you, Shel, but ...
I'm waiting for when
FUCK YOU -
I have had it with your shit.
I dont owe you a fucking thing asshole.
You are a complete fucking asshole and
to say since I dont post stuff to the PUG
I have no credibility is FUCKING BULLSHIT.
I have been shooting for over 30 years,
Posts to PUG is not the only way to determine
a
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS- A challange to the list?
I suggest its because you cant make a
logical argument against what I am saying
becuase you know what I am saying is
the truth of the matter. Put up or
shut up you weasle.
Doug Brewer:
As list owner and admin of the PDML, do you accept this kind of
consistently rude, obnoxious behavior from your subscribers? I have
long since consigned anything that JCO posts to the bit bucket, but I
was reviewing the deletions this morning and found this latest
nonsense
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS- A challange to the list?
Either find something wrong with my
posts ( factual or opinions ) or
shut the fuck up.
Umm, he, and others have already done that. The problem is your refusal
to be swayed
OK, I agree with you, you're right. I did use proprietary incorrectly.
However, perhaps Pentax would like us, or at least some/many of their
customers to believe that the Pentax branded battery is the only one that
should or can be used.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Well said Godfrey. With the new K10 coming out I've heard it said that
Pentax monitor groups like this for useful feedback. I doubt they will
be bothering if it deteriorates further
Peter
On 11/11/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug Brewer:
As list owner and admin of the PDML,
I have it on reasonably good authority that someone from Pentax was on the
group, tried to participate in some discussions, was treated rudely, and
left. Of course, he was here anonymously wrt his position with Pentax.
It wasn't long ago that someone here wished that there could have been an
Coincides exactly with my experience ... that makes two of us who are wrong
LOL
Shel
[Original Message]
From: William Robb
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
I suggest its because you cant make a
logical argument against what I am saying
becuase you know what I am
Godfrey,
Does it matter much if one uses a 1500, 1700, or 1750 mah battery? What do
those numbers actually mean? Could one use a 2500 mah battery (assuming
one was available)?
What I'm getting at, if I'm not clear, is that I heard that batteries for
the Pentax need to be within some certain
Without seeing your work and some examples of what you contend is true and
factual, your comments lack a degree of credibility. As you have said, put
up or shut up ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: J. C. O'Connell
FUCK YOU -
I have had it with your shit.
I dont owe you a fucking
Hello Thibouille,
Thanks for your answer, but I'm a stupid user/collector
And, as all collectors, I'm a bit paranoid..
I'm waiting for this lens, not the new (and better) DFA..
Best and thank you again.
Ezio
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Very eloquent.
You are a true gentleman.
Dave
On 11/11/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FUCK YOU -
I have had it with your shit.
I dont owe you a fucking thing asshole.
You are a complete fucking asshole and
to say since I dont post stuff to the PUG
I have no credibility is
I SAY FALSE, use a 40-105 zoom with a constant
aperture so you can QUICKLY go from 40
to 105 and tell me you have no difference.
YOU WONT BE ABLE TO DO THAT because there
is a big difference. Using two lenses one
at a time with time differences between
the comparison is not the way to prove it.
Go back and read his post, he said my posts experience are
all suspect unless I post photos for him. If
he cant argue my posts directly to the subject matter
of the posts, then he has no business indirectly
saying they are all wrong ( or suspect) just
because I dont post to the PUG. Thats a
Are you retarded? How is a picture going
to illustrate the difference in difficultly
of focussing a 35mm F3.5 lens vs a 105mm F3.5
lens? You are trying to prove an incorrect point
of your's ( very poorly, I might add ) with
stupid irrellevant requests. It really shows
you near total lack of
HIS post was abusive and was the first strike,
not mine. Mine was retalitory. If you dont like
this stuff going on, then punish the people
who start these things, not me.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Saturday,
I say You're both wrong then. ANSWER MY QUESTION :
Have you ever had a zoom lens that
was not easier to focus accurately
at the long end compared to the wide
end? I HAVE NOT. EVERY single one of
them is/was easier to focus accurately at the long
end. Now if you can understand what that
means I
On 11/11/06 11:41 AM, Shel Belinkoff, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It wasn't long ago that someone here wished that there could have been an
engineer from Pentax here to answer a few questions. Well, it seems there
was, but he went away.
To the dark side? :-)
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
mAh is a measure of capacity, the more you have, the longer the battery
will last in a given application.
2500mAh is likely not possible in that form factor, to make a 7.4v
2500mAh battery would require a physically larger battery.
-Adam
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Godfrey,
Does it matter much
Alll that's really necessary is that the rest of us ignore JCO's
posts. He's obviously not well, yet people continue to push his
buttons and incite him. The problem is easily solved.
Paul
On Nov 11, 2006, at 11:12 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Doug Brewer:
As list owner and admin of the
That´s what my children usually say: he started it, but I´m hoping
that they get a little bit wiser when they grow up.
DagT
Den 11. nov. 2006 kl. 18.02 skrev J. C. O'Connell:
HIS post was abusive and was the first strike,
not mine. Mine was retalitory. If you dont like
this stuff going on,
Every camera manufacturer wants that because it nets them more profit
in accessory sales. That doesn't mean the battery is proprietary ...
Pentax buys it from the same source that other brands buy it from.
Godfrey
On Nov 11, 2006, at 8:21 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
OK, I agree with you,
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Nov 10, 2006, at 4:44 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
the camera makers
themselves even tell you to focus at longest
setting and then zoom to length you want
because its easier to focus accurately at
longer lengths
This is not a good way to work. Most lenses aren't
On 11/12/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I say You're both wrong then. ANSWER MY QUESTION :
They did. It didn't track with your experience. Question answered.
This isn't a physics or mathematics problem John, where there is only
one true answer. Some find long lenses easier to
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS- A challange to the list?
I SAY FALSE,
Say what you want John, I tried your test with what I had at hand, and
found the results that I found.
I'm not particularly interested in pursuing this further.
cbwaters wrote:
I had the same sudden pang of fear there Ann. You can mail him at his
home
address. I'll mail it to you off-list.
If anyone else would like to send Don a card or something and needs his
home address, feel free to email Cory and OK, just kidding. Send me
a private email
Bob W wrote:
I already stated that this assumes all other variables
are constant
Mark!
Thanks, but I try to keep the annual quotations list from inflaming
lingering animosities if at all possible.
But that did literally make me laugh out loud. :)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: list abuse
Alll that's really necessary is that the rest of us ignore JCO's
posts. He's obviously not well, yet people continue to push his
buttons and incite him. The problem is easily solved.
All that is really necessary is
- Original Message -
From: DagT
Subject: Re: list abuse
That´s what my children usually say: he started it, but I´m hoping
that they get a little bit wiser when they grow up.
John's mental development may well have halted when he was about 7 years
old, judging from his posts. He does
I disagree, Paul. A list owner's responsibility is to manage the
list, deal with technical issues of subscription and communications,
and deal with problem subscribers. JCO can go off and dominate the
list traffic on almost any topic. It creates bad will and a poor
image for the mailiing
As Adam said...
A 1500mAh battery of a particular type might provide power for small
percentage less time than a 1750mAh battery, but with respect to form
factor and voltage they will be identical.
Sometimes the mAh ratings aren't particularly accurate. For instance,
I have a Sony and a
The question is: what is there to be paranoid about? I do not
understand your reluctance to buy the improved lens that serves all
needs. What is special about the FA50/2.8 Macro?
G
On Nov 11, 2006, at 8:45 AM, Eziocapo wrote:
Thanks for your answer, but I'm a stupid user/collector
And, as
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Using a Super Tak w/ istDS- A challange to the list?
Go back and read his post, he said my posts experience are
all suspect unless I post photos for him. If
he cant argue my posts directly to the subject matter
of the posts,
So, what we want is a 7.4 volt battery (for the K10D) with the largest mah
that works in the physical size and form that will fit the camera. OK, I
understand that. Now, what happens if one uses a battery with greater or
lesser voltage? I'm sure there's a point at which the bats won't work
You shouldn't use a battery with higher or lower rated voltage, and I
suspect that there will be none available. Higher voltages can cause
overheating, lower voltages might not provide the potential to drive
the camera systems.
Actual voltage delivered will vary by some no matter what,
AFAIK, he's still with Pentax ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: K.Takeshita
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It wasn't long ago that someone here wished that there could have been
an
engineer from Pentax here to answer a few questions. Well, it seems
there
was, but he went away.
To the
The thing is, Paul, sooner or later JCO jumps into conversations and
threads and becomes abusive and begins to use foul language. Are you
suggesting that when he jumps into a thread, as he did when I posted my
observations about focusing, that even if he says nothing outrageous he be
ignored -
In what way was his post abusive? Who's post was that? Can you provide
an example of the abuse - perhaps quote the portion that was abusive?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: J. C. O'Connell
HIS post was abusive and was the first strike,
not mine. Mine was retalitory. If you dont like
this
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I say You're both wrong then. ANSWER MY QUESTION :
Have you ever had a zoom lens that
was not easier to focus accurately
at the long end compared to the wide
end?
H, I thought the question was about 35mm lenses... or was it 105mm?
Now I have to use a zoom?
OK. So it seems to be that the best approach is to stick with a known
brand of good quality, and use the highest mah that can be found. Great -
you and Adam have answered my questions just fine. Thanks!
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
You shouldn't use a battery with
I have received a couple of messages from Paul on the same subject, one of
which was fleshed out with some details and specifics.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: William Robb
All that is really necessary is for John to use civil language rather
than dropping into abusive bully mode as
Hi,
I have posted glowing reviews before about the photographs and books
of James Ravilious. His books are quite hard to find, but I have just
received a copy of Down the Deep Lanes, which is still in print and
available from Amazon UK, so for anyone who is interested, but hasn't
been able to
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: list abuse
The thing is, Paul, sooner or later JCO jumps into conversations and
threads and becomes abusive and begins to use foul language. Are you
suggesting that when he jumps into a thread, as he did when I posted
my
How about the grip? Does that have a set of batteries in it?
I've found that I usually see this problem if I've got batteries
loaded in both the grip and the camera, and one of the sets is
less than fully charged. Taking out one of the sets of batteries
makes the problem go away.
On Sat, Nov
C'mon Christian, don't you know that a moving target is harder to hit? LOL
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Christian
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I say You're both wrong then.
ANSWER MY QUESTION :
Have you ever had a zoom lens that
was not easier to focus accurately
at the long end
I agree. I've had plenty of leeway for him in the past and I've even
defended his right to make his points.
I have now grown very very very tired of this rude and obnoxious behavior.
I personally vote to kick his *** off the list. It'll free up space in my
junkmail folder.
Tom C.
From:
Were I the list owner, I'd ban him permanently.
William Robb
I'm voting Aye with both hands raised.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I run both a 4 gb and 6 gb microdrive in my *istD without any issues.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, November 11, 2006, 2:48:38 AM, you wrote:
T My 4GB Microdrive works fine :)
T --
T Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
T --
T *ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;)
What's the deal with Type 1 and Type 2 CF cards? My recollection is that
one is somewhat larger in some dimension than the other. If that's the
case, is there any problem or caution using one or the other in the istD?
Bruce, do you find an advantage using a micro drive over a regular CF card?
Jan, Godfrey, Shel, thanks for the kind words and invaluable advice. It's
good to be back on the list again. I think I'll leave the spare battery and
SD card until closer to the purchase time as is the concensus of opinion here.
I've just found what I think is a remote control F, I used it with
Every camera manufacturer wants that because it nets them more profit
in accessory sales. That doesn't mean the battery is proprietary ...
Pentax buys it from the same source that other brands buy it from.
And considering the number of batteries out there with the exact same form
factor
Until a few weeks ago, both DS and DL were still listed on the French
Pentax site. Since then, the K10D entered the site, and only the DS
disappeared. The DL is still there.
Patrice
Adam Maas a écrit :
Actually, they all are discontinued. The K100D and K110D are the current
models.
-Adam
I think Bill Robb's post pretty well nails the situation. The question is
what, if anything, should be done with JCO. I'm not really in favor of
banning individuals from this group (heck, I may be next - I can sometimes
be annoying or a PITA - my wife used to call me Shel Bellicose and even
went
Any one of us can get out of hand on occasion. Shel, even you don't hold a
candle to JCO. :-)
After putting up with the BS for a month now, there's two basic options we
can take. 1. Ban him, which gets rid of him for good (I don't see at this
point where that would be a loss). Of course he
John Celio wrote:
And considering the number of batteries out there with the exact same form
factor (power contacts aside) as the one Pentax is using in the K10D (Canon,
Nikon, and KonicaMinolta have all used it, as well as others), I want to
know who makes and holds the patents for them.
Assuming for a moment that JCO is correct in his generalization, one of the
things he's failing to consider is the differences between people. Some
have better eyesight, some wear glasses, some glasses are better suited to
use with a camera, or even certain cameras, some people are color blind,
Im not the one going around asking 30 yr experienced photographers
to post photos to prove things that cant be proved with a photo.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Stenquist
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 12:21 PM
To:
On Nov 11, 2006, at 12:48 PM, William Robb wrote:
The problem is more easily solved by the one than by the many.
John needs to learn civil discourse and use it rather than abusive
bullying.
That would certainly be the best solution, but I'm not sure it's
possible.
Paul
--
PDML
Hi,
I've been using a K18/3.5 for some time now on the istDS. I like it quite
a bit, although there are a few K lenses that are a bit sharper. But
absolute sharpness isn't everything, at least for me. Tonal rendition,
ease of use, size, are all considerations. Here's a shot I recently posted
Im the bully? Who demanding me to produce 30 yrs
worth of photos to prove something that cant
be proved with a photo? Dont blame me for
others reckless requests.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Saturday, November 11,
NOPE. No one ever stated that they
ever found any zoom lenses that
werent easier to focus on the long
end. Thats why I asked it again.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Savage
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 12:33 PM
To:
You might be right. Although JCO only seems to lose it when someone
engages him specifically in a continuing debate.
Paul
On Nov 11, 2006, at 12:47 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I disagree, Paul. A list owner's responsibility is to manage the
list, deal with technical issues of subscription and
Dont you guys know the definition of a zoom
lens? Its a lens that does not change focus
as you change the focal length. Yes there
are plenty of el crapo zoom lenses out there
that dont hold focus ( or improperly aligned
good ones ), but I know for a fact that many DO
hold focus throughout the zoom
That's true. I don't know if this applies to Nimh batteries, but
nicads can be trained' to discharge faster. When my son and I raced
electric radio control cars, I would train the nicads by discharging
them on a resistor pack with just 1/2 an ohm resistance. I had some
1800 mAh C
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
