From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/12/12 Wed AM 06:15:20 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: A suggestion
At 03:06 PM 12/12/2007, Doug Brewer wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007, at 9:07 PM, Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
If we all sent Doug a quarter he would
P. J. Alling escribió:
The Jog wheel on my Ds seems to be getting flaky. When attempting to
stop down the aperture or increase shutter speed, (in other words
turning the wheel to the right), it doesn't always stop down, sometimes
it even opens up. Anyone else have this problem and know of
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/12/12 Wed AM 02:28:23 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Legalese, Canadian Style
My thoughts exactly Dave!
Why would he be looking for size 22 thongs?
Regards, Bob S.
Maybe he just came across one.
On
Not to be picky, but I think that should be hippo's bum. Maybe they're
similar...
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
http://www.blognow.com.au/peso1/
On 11.12.2007, at 16:35 , Adam Maas wrote:
Ditto the Sony's. Only Pentax supports SR without camera/body
communication.
No, according to my friends from Sony Alpha club, SSS works with
manual lenses, but you don't have an option to set focal lengrh, thus
making SSS not as efficient as SR
On 12/12/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
In fact, I think K10D with its 3 fps seems to be right on target for me
- not too fast, not too slow.
On my camera there is 'H' and 'L' for the continuous shooting speeds.
The user defines what rate H (high) is and what L (low) is. I have
On 12/12/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
I suppose that the lens (SMC A 20/2.8) could be attached to your Canon,
right?
Strangely enough, the thought had indeed crossed my mind. But for that I
would have to butcher the back of it. You getting this Peter?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
There is always plasma donation.
Whilst pondering the thought that, today, I have spent the last 30 years
of my life in the same job I had a thought. Not of suicide but a
constructive one.
How about making one of those self-published books (as Anne and others
have done) of PDML quotes,
On Dec 11, 2007, at 17:11, Bob Blakely wrote:
Which one is the TARDIS and why isn't it blue?
(Digging into what I remember from 25 years ago...)
The TARDIS is a Police box, not a phone booth (that's why).
No idea what a police box is, though. Maybe Wikipedia could help
there. Yes, it
On Dec 12, 2007 1:06 AM, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007, at 9:07 PM, Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
If we all sent Doug a quarter he would think of himself as a two-bit
whore ;-P
I'm already a two-bit whore, thank you very much.
You recieved my quarter then.:-)
Dave
I don't even remember who I am most days.
From: Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/12/12 Wed AM 09:19:20 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PDML book (was Re: A suggestion)
Not to be picky, but I think that should be hippo's bum. Maybe they're
Here is one from Nevada. Its known as Elephant rock, but was hard to
get a decent angle on it.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5863227
You can use it if you like.
Dave
On Dec 12, 2007 3:26 AM, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
On Dec 12, 2007, at 2:53, Carlos Royo wrote:
I had a similar problem with the e-dial of my *ist DS, it seems a
common
and easy to solve occurrence. I took the batteries out of the camera,
sprayed a bit of CRC contact cleaner on the wheel, turned left and
right
a few times, and let the
On Dec 11, 2007, at 22:32, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Sounds like the commutator in the jog wheel is getting dirty or worn.
That's repair time.
Not pop the top and hit it with some Radio Shack contact cleaner?
Gently, of course, so you don't fill the entire camera with the
stuff. I think
On Dec 11, 2007, at 20:05, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Taken during the past little league season. I would appreciate any
thoughts on cropping.
Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/350 sec @ f/4
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/rivercats_0004.htm
If you could re-take it with the
Yes, i think so to.
Very clear shot with that 100-300 Bruce.
Dave
On Dec 11, 2007 10:07 PM, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say no crop--the other two figures give a lot of
context without being distracting. Nice shot.
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taken
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5863227
Dave
On Dec 12, 2007 8:07 AM, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/12/12 Wed PM 12:39:55 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: A suggestion
On Dec 12, 2007 1:06
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Re: PDML book (was Re: A suggestion)
Here is one from Nevada. Its known as Elephant rock, but was hard to
get a decent angle on it.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5863227
You can use it if you like.
I think that picture
SSS is non-functional without focal length information according to
the gurus over at Dyxum.com, it needs that information to work
correctly. Otherwise it simply moves the incorrect amount. And 50mm is
not a default, since screwmount adaptors with preset focal length
communication are available in
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/12/12 Wed PM 12:39:55 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: A suggestion
On Dec 12, 2007 1:06 AM, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007, at 9:07 PM, Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
If we all sent
Sorry gang. I tried to do a gmail search to find my old topic but failed.
So i'll ask this again, to see what the answers may be. Ignore if you
feel so inclined.;-), or helpfully redirect me to my old thread.:-)
I mentioned a while back, that on my PC, XP Home PSCS2, that when i
look at photos
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk
Subject: Re: K10D and older lenses
On 11.12.2007, at 16:35 , Adam Maas wrote:
Ditto the Sony's. Only Pentax supports SR without camera/body
communication.
No, according to my friends from Sony Alpha club, SSS works with
manual
Screwmount adaptors are your friend.
-Adam
On 12/12/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What manual lenses are available for the Alpha? It's using the Minolta
Maxxum AF lens mount, IIRC.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Quotation Archives (back to when I started keeping track in 2003) are
now on line:
http://www.robertstech.com/quote_01.htm
http://www.robertstech.com/quote_02.htm
http://www.robertstech.com/quote_03.htm
http://www.robertstech.com/quote_04.htm
2007 will be posted when it's complete in about 3
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Re: PDML book (was Re: A suggestion)
Here is one from Nevada. Its known as Elephant rock, but was hard to
get a decent angle on it.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5863227
You can use it if you
Thanks for looking and commenting, Bruce--the paucity
of comments indicates that this shot didn't spin many
motors.
The shots without people in the way looked kinda
empty.
Oh, well...
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dunno, I think the slight movement of the people
kind of
Bruce, really well caught! I sort of like the red cap bill on either
side and your horizontal placement of sucker guy is great.
If you have a bit more frame available at the top you might give the
top of his head a slightly room..or not. If anything, I'd consider
cropping the far right guy some
Cotty wrote:
As there's quite a few photogs interested in nature and the animal world
on the list, you might find this as fascinating as I did...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7130014.stm
cool! shotguns from space! now that's efficient hunting!
--
Christian
Don't sell yourself short Doug, you're at least a two dollar whore.
Doug Brewer wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007, at 9:07 PM, Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
If we all sent Doug a quarter he would think of himself as a two-bit
whore ;-P
I'm already a two-bit whore, thank you very much.
--
Thanks, Rick. I did play the cropping game with this and found I liked
the expanse and isolation it implies.
Since the geese are moving to the left of the frame, I felt
uncomfortable not leaving them someplace to go. It's a thing that's
difficult for me to explain. The potential of an eminent
John,
You look mighty close.
Was she in earshot of hearing the shutter snap there?
That could be risky.
Regards, Bob S.
On Dec 11, 2007 9:06 PM, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 08:28:23PM -0600, Bob Sullivan wrote:
My thoughts exactly Dave!
Why would he be
mike wilson wrote:
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/12/12 Wed AM 02:28:23 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Legalese, Canadian Style
My thoughts exactly Dave!
Why would he be looking for size 22 thongs?
Regards, Bob S.
Maybe he just
Someone else already suggested your ultimate fate, (if there's a caring
God, of which I often have my doubts)...
Cotty wrote:
On 12/12/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
I suppose that the lens (SMC A 20/2.8) could be attached to your Canon,
right?
Strangely enough,
On Dec 13, 2007 12:32 AM, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
My 43 limited unfortunately is no longer with me after than
unsuccessful drop in the airport. I am now on the hunt for the
replacement lens. Suppose the money is not an option, my choices are:
1. Brand new 43 lim (rebate
Anybody know what's in CRC, it may not be available around here, and a
substitute may be available. I'd like to get this done asap.
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Dec 12, 2007, at 2:53, Carlos Royo wrote:
I had a similar problem with the e-dial of my *ist DS, it seems a
common
and easy to
Boris, I once owned an M 50 f/1.4 that was my work horse. I'd think now
what with the digital crop, the 50 would serve well for portraits..if
you care.
I have an A 50mm now, but it's an f/2.
Jack
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
My 43 limited unfortunately is no longer with me
I'm loving the FA 50/1.4 and it's dirt cheap. At about 40% of the cost
of the 43, it's a very good choice.
-Adam
On 12/12/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
My 43 limited unfortunately is no longer with me after than
unsuccessful drop in the airport. I am now on the hunt for the
Interesting read.
Dave
On Dec 11, 2007 7:26 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As there's quite a few photogs interested in nature and the animal world
on the list, you might find this as fascinating as I did...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7130014.stm
--
Cheers,
Cotty
Hi!
My 43 limited unfortunately is no longer with me after than
unsuccessful drop in the airport. I am now on the hunt for the
replacement lens. Suppose the money is not an option, my choices are:
1. Brand new 43 lim (rebate is at large)
2. Brand new 50/1.4 (I do want more speed) and it is
Thanks Cotty, it is an interesting article. A giant iron meteorite
capable of peppering a state (or wider) with shot is amazing. It
would have been one hell of a fireworks show... And left a lot of dead
animals.
Regards, Bob S.
On Dec 11, 2007 6:26 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As
I'm thinking of selling my FA 50mm f/1.7. Bought it new three years
ago. Excellent lens
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 12/12/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody know what's in CRC, it may not be available around here, and a
substitute may be available. I'd like to get this done asap.
Find a real electronics or industrial supply store, and ask them for
residue-free contact cleaner. It is very
This came out a bit harsher than I'd intended. Assume a smiley at the
end there...
P. J. Alling wrote:
Someone else already suggested your ultimate fate, (if there's a caring
God, of which I often have my doubts)...
Cotty wrote:
On 12/12/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, the two fifties are more like portrait lenses on digital format
cameras, I don't think that I'd see them as standard exactly. My
suggestion would be to get a new 43mm, but then I happen to really like
that lens a lot, (on either film or digital bodies thought it becomes a
very different
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:32:36 +0200, Boris Liberman wrote
Hi!
My 43 limited unfortunately is no longer with me after than
unsuccessful drop in the airport. I am now on the hunt for the
replacement lens. Suppose the money is not an option, my choices are:
1. Brand new 43 lim (rebate is at
On Dec 12, 2007 10:40 AM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody know what's in CRC,
A thong.??
Dave
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Dec 12, 2007, at 2:53, Carlos Royo wrote:
I had a similar problem with the e-dial of my *ist DS, it seems a
common
and easy to solve occurrence. I
I had forgotten the 2005 quote by Cotty at his most articulate...
Geez, someone reading those quotes out of context would think I was
crazy, heck, they'd think we were all crazy. That is as opposed, of
course, to reading them in context which would remove any doubt.
Mark Roberts wrote:
I agree. It is a bit more telephoto than I think is good for a normal
lens, however. If I really need normal, I use my DA 40 2.8 or the
high end of my FA 20-35. Form what I've heard, the FA 35 2.0 is nice
but hard to find.
David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/12/2007 10:38 AM
On Dec 13, 2007
True
Bob Blakely wrote:
You are generally correct, however:
Ammunition not being available is no bar from firing any old firearm. One
can always make the ammunition if one wants to, and it's usually a
relatively trivial matter. I know, I've done it. Further, while ammo for
certain
Cotty,
Is this the cause of your magnetic personality? Interesting article.
John Graves
WA1JG
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cotty wrote:
As there's quite a few photogs interested in nature and the animal world
on the list, you might find this as fascinating as I did...
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:53:00 -0500, Steve Desjardins wrote
.. Form what I've heard, the FA 35 2.0
is nice but hard to find.
Great lens if you can find one. They were available new not long ago here in
the UK.
John
I'm making a habit of this today, once again harsher than I intended...
(Assume the same smiley at the end and I'll try to be nicer in the future).
P. J. Alling wrote:
Don't sell yourself short Doug, you're at least a two dollar whore.
Doug Brewer wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007, at 9:07 PM,
G'day All.
One form this evenings outing (~155KB)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/1_IGP0073.jpg
As always, any and all comments welcome.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Talking to self though I am not mad, really.
I've got both 31 and 77 limited lenses so that it is not exactly the
standard lens I am after. It is exactly what it is - the replacement for
43 ltd that unfortunately expired. So I think FA 50/1.4 would be a
reasonable choice...
Any other opinions
On Dec 12, 2007, at 9:32, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
My 43 limited unfortunately is no longer with me after than
unsuccessful drop in the airport. I am now on the hunt for the
replacement lens. Suppose the money is not an option, my choices are:
No chance of repair? How bad is/was it?
On Dec 12, 2007, at 10:53, graywolf wrote:
Radio Shack, I belive their contact cleaner is just the CRC stuff
relabled.
One time when I bought some contact cleaner at R/S, they had two
different cans:
1. TV Contact cleaner
2. Color TV contact cleaner
The stuff for color was a dollar
All photographs are ordinary. In the past 160 years everything has been done,
over, and over, and over again. So, they are all ordinary, but some are
interesting despite that.
Graywolf
Website: http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Blog:http://www.graywolfphoto.com/journal/
I guess my 2 MXen do not count as I still use them.
Graywolf
Website: http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Blog:http://www.graywolfphoto.com/journal/
---
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Radio Shack, I belive their contact cleaner is just the CRC stuff relabled.
Graywolf
Website: http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Blog:http://www.graywolfphoto.com/journal/
---
P. J. Alling wrote:
Anybody know what's in CRC, it
Boris Liberman wrote:
Talking to self though I am not mad, really.
I've got both 31 and 77 limited lenses so that it is not exactly the
standard lens I am after. It is exactly what it is - the replacement for
43 ltd that unfortunately expired. So I think FA 50/1.4 would be a
reasonable
Riskier is hearing the thong snap!
Regards,
Bob...
-
Note: No trees were killed in the sending of this message,
but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John,
You look
Is this the cause of your magnetic personality? Interesting article.
The thought has polarised many an opinion.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Charge a per hour, plus expenses (I used to add 15-25% to the expenses as sort
of a handling charge). Give them everything you shoot that is worthwhile, with
non-exclusive rights (charge 300-400% higher if they want exclusive rights)
which means you can still use the images yourself for
Well, if it were under warranty it would be a no brainer. I've had the
poor thing for almost two years now and I have it on manual a lot so it
gets quite a work out. In fact I justed checked and the first shot I
made with it is dated 12-21-2005. I's been trouble free until now so I
can't
Hi, Dave,
My monitor may need calibrated again, but the foreground is too dark
for my eye. Also, the center mound's top surface is exactly in line
with the horizon. Just too much of a distraction.
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All.
One form this evenings outing
Mine did that really bad.
Since it was still under warranty just I sent it in.
Francis
P. J. Alling wrote:
The Jog wheel on my Ds seems to be getting flaky. When attempting to
stop down the aperture or increase shutter speed, (in other words
turning the wheel to the right), it doesn't
On 12/12/07, Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One time when I bought some contact cleaner at R/S, they had two
different cans:
1. TV Contact cleaner
2. Color TV contact cleaner
The stuff for color was a dollar more expensive. I could never
figure out what the difference could
The color one was designed to assure that the colors wouldn't fade or run.
:-)
Igor
Wed Dec 12 12:00:58 EST 2007
Charles Robinson wrote:
One time when I bought some contact cleaner at R/S, they had two
different cans:
1. TV Contact cleaner
2. Color TV contact cleaner
The stuff
On 12/12/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
I never really owned 50/1.4 though...
I have the K50 1.4 and have owned the K50 1.2 in the past. The 1.2 has
bigger bragging rights, but really, having had both, I would not go for
the 1.2 - the 1.4 is a superb lens - I'm sure many here
Color used to be lubricated IIRC. I'm not sure that's called for here.
They used to sell something we called tuner cleaner, (which wasn't it's
actual name, but wasn't the color contact cleaner), I used to clean up
the brushed aluminum front panels on stereo components really nicely.
It's
On 12/12/07, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
My monitor may need calibrated again, but the foreground is too dark
for my eye. Also, the center mound's top surface is exactly in line
with the horizon. Just too much of a distraction.
Check you monitor Jack, looks fine on my displays
David Savage wrote:
G'day All.
One form this evenings outing (~155KB)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/1_IGP0073.jpg
As always, any and all comments welcome.
Cheers,
Dave
everyone is waxing Theriaultian I see :)
for a nit - it bothers me a little that the top of the rock
Didn't get a chance to look at this one until now.
The degree of movement and subsequent blur of the people, taking up
so much of the center of the frame, is too distracting and detracts
from the photo too much. As Bruce succinctly put it, They're in the
way.
Godfrey
On Dec 12, 2007, at
Boris,
I would second Cotty's recommendation. Pick a 1.4 over the 1.2. The
1.2's have some compromises to get to f1.2. I cannot see any of those
in the f1.4's. And an A50/1.4 or M50/1.4 may be available at a
reduced price.
As for 43mm limited vs FA50/1.4, I have carried and shot with both.
The last can of Radio Shack cleaner I got left an oily
residue.
--- Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 12, 2007, at 10:53, graywolf wrote:
Radio Shack, I belive their contact cleaner is
just the CRC stuff
relabled.
One time when I bought some contact cleaner at R/S,
Actually I have to agree with Jack, the forground seems a bit dark. I
just recalibrate my screen, by eye but still the brightness should be
alright. The top of the mound merging with the horizon is different and
some might see it as a flaw. Seems like it would be better if it didn't.
Cotty
On 13/12/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
G'day All.
One form this evenings outing (~155KB)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/1_IGP0073.jpg
As always, any and all comments welcome.
That's almost such a fantastic pic - nits are - horizon, and the
foreground with an
Cotty wrote:
Is this the cause of your magnetic personality? Interesting article.
The thought has polarised many an opinion.
finally a pun thread!
I was glad to read this - being an old geology student - I needed to
bone up on the subject.
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Well, I've got film loaded in one of mine, but I haven't shot a frame in
about a year. I really should shoot off that roll sometime, but then
I'll have to get some more developer, and I've just been too lazy since
HC110 has become unavailable from the local stores.
graywolf wrote:
I guess
http://www.islandlight.ca/showphoto.php?image_id=475gallery_id=tb=sbs=pentaxdiscuss
Taken last week from the upper deck of the Cortes Island ferry at sunrise.
With the Ist DS + K200mm 2.5
Thanks for looking,
Francis
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007, at 20:05, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Taken during the past little league season. I would appreciate any
thoughts on cropping.
Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/350 sec @ f/4
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/rivercats_0004.htm
ann sanfedele wrote:
Cotty wrote:
Is this the cause of your magnetic personality? Interesting article.
The thought has polarised many an opinion.
finally a pun thread!
I was glad to read this - being an old geology student - I needed to
bone up on the subject.
Way to go Annsan, you
Thanks, Cotty, that's very valuable advise that you gave me here...
Yes, I am leaning towards FA 50/1.4.
Boris
Cotty wrote:
On 12/12/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
I never really owned 50/1.4 though...
I have the K50 1.4 and have owned the K50 1.2 in the past. The 1.2
The foreground seems a bit dark. I opened it up a little in Photoshop
which tends to wash a bit of the drama in the sky. This looks like a
job for layers.
David Savage wrote:
G'day All.
One form this evenings outing (~155KB)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/1_IGP0073.jpg
As usual on the internet, someone chopped off a part of his sentence and used
it
as a quote. There ought to be a law against quoting only a fragment of a
sentences. OTOH, there are to many laws already. Maybe dueling is the answer. I
mean if you are likely to get shot for it, you may think
I think what bothers me is about how the one wall of weeds meets
almost exactly at the horizon. It almost looks cut off at first
glance. Very nice sky.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 8:27:04 AM, you wrote:
DS G'day All.
DS One form this evenings outing (~155KB)
DS
Francis wrote:
http://www.islandlight.ca/showphoto.php?image_id=475gallery_id=tb=sbs=pentaxdiscuss
Taken last week from the upper deck of the Cortes Island ferry at sunrise.
With the Ist DS + K200mm 2.5
Thanks for looking,
Francis
gorgeous
and I'm going to try and remember to post
I'm going to have to reserve judgment 'til I see a larger image.
Resolution and contrasts remain a question.
I like the composition, however.
Jack
--- Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.islandlight.ca/showphoto.php?image_id=475gallery_id=tb=sbs=pentaxdiscuss
Taken last week from
Ditto for me. There is a lot of wasted space with that white matte -
not really sure that it adds - kind of takes away from the image for
me. Would love to see it posted bigger without the mask before really
deciding.
--
Bruce
Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 11:04:01 AM, you wrote:
JD I'm
Mark Roberts wrote:
ann sanfedele wrote:
Cotty wrote:
Is this the cause of your magnetic personality? Interesting article.
The thought has polarised many an opinion.
finally a pun thread!
I was glad to read this - being an old geology student - I needed
ann sanfedele wrote:
Francis wrote:
http://www.islandlight.ca/showphoto.php?image_id=475gallery_id=tb=sbs=pentaxdiscuss
gorgeous
and I'm going to try and remember to post something I took there in 1993
when I was staying at Healing Waters
ann
Yes do!
That would be so cool
On Dec 12, 2007, at 12:37, Rick Womer wrote:
The last can of Radio Shack cleaner I got left an oily
residue.
Mine too. Still might be OK if you could be sure that the contacts
for the thumbwheel is/are the only thing which get touched by the stuff.
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - [EMAIL
I calibrated today, and it looks a bit murky up front.
The framing i like
Dave
On Dec 12, 2007 1:08 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually I have to agree with Jack, the forground seems a bit dark. I
just recalibrate my screen, by eye but still the brightness should be
alright.
My thoughts exactly Dave!
Why would he be looking for size 22 thongs?
Regards, Bob S.
Maybe he just came across one.
oh, please, Mike - enough is enough.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Bruce,
Looking at your baseball photo, I am impressed by the quality of the
Sigma lens. I had heard rumours about flaky AF performance of this lens
with Pentax DSLRs...have you had any problems? I have used the 70-200mm
EX with absolutely no problems and am intrigued by this lens.
Thanks,
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:54:05 -0500, Christian wrote
Boris Liberman wrote:
Talking to self though I am not mad, really.
I've got both 31 and 77 limited lenses so that it is not exactly the
standard lens I am after. It is exactly what it is - the replacement for
43 ltd that
Overall I like it, but I wish the eyes were more illuminated.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Chris Fifty
Chris is a Toronto bike messenger. He's worked at the same courier
company forever,
Maybe
dueling is the answer.
I'd go along with that. The world was a better place when there was
duelling and chaps dressed like Keith Carradine and Harvey Keitel.
Perhaps I should move to Scotlandshire:
http://www.dawnduellists.co.uk/
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Sounds good to me.
Me too.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A suggestion
On 11/12/07, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Whilst pondering the thought that, today, I have spent the last 30 years
of my
At the expense of blowing out the highlights, if it were mine, I'd brighten
it up a bit, both highlights mid range.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Pike Place Market 3
A run of very long days at work
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
