Nice shot, Drew!
But where's the oar? :-)
Best,
Jostein
2008/6/3 drew [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all.
Last week we had a short camping holiday in Devon. At a little village
called Malmsmead in the area known as Doone Vally (after the book Lorna
Doone) we found a ford, the kids were desperate to
Great shot, Toine.
That DA 35 sure looks good.
Lovely bokeh on the rear end of the stamina.
Jostein
2008/6/1 Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A poppy from my garden. We call these flowers klaproos (exploding rose)
http://www.repiuk.nl/images/PESO/klaproos.jpg
K10D, DA35
Toine
--
PDML
Welcome back, Don!
I'm a bit curious about the stacking. In the resulting shot there are
brighter fields beside some of the stamens on the RH side (towards the
bottom) and just above the stigma. However they are not very prominent
in your shot. Whenever I have attempted such stacks I've ended up
D. Glenn Arthur Jr. wrote:
I went to Radio Shack to buy parts to build myself a cable release
for the *istD. They had submini phone plugs, but only mono, not
TRS, and it turns out that shorting ring to sleeve keeps the
autofocus constantly activated (which I presume costs battery life).
I love English. ;-) Dictionary.co.uk lists 12 definitions for
Paddling, the one I meant was To dabble in water with hands or feet
Thanks for your comments all, much appreciated.
Cheers,
Drew.
Nice shot, Drew!
But where's the oar? :-)
Best,
Jostein
2008/6/3 drew [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Alun,
Here's another:
http://picasaweb.google.com/don.donwilliams/Stack/photo#5207921563482660690
It was made in a rush as I have to leave for the city in half an hour. I
shouldn't have started this. The results are all mediocre at best. My
original intention was merely an illustration of
Dear All, esp Bill for pointing me in the right direction here...
I have a K10D - its nice, its black, I have a really nice bag with it -
here my knowledge ends!
To tell a lie I have used the green setting but its not good for my
subjects - dogs!
I find it harder to use in the home the
On 4/6/08, Jo Lueck, discombobulated, unleashed:
Dear All, esp Bill for pointing me in the right direction here...
I have a K10D - its nice, its black, I have a really nice bag with it -
here my knowledge ends!
To tell a lie I have used the green setting but its not good for my
subjects -
Shalom from sunny Israel. You're in for the ride of your life ;-).
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Jo Lueck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All, esp Bill for pointing me in the right direction here...
I have a K10D - its nice, its black, I have a really nice bag with it -
here my knowledge
Oxford Oxford - you can practically move in and teach me yourself!!!
ANY help, bearing in mind I am allergic to manuals would help!
On 4 Jun 2008, at 09:33, Cotty wrote:
On 4/6/08, Jo Lueck, discombobulated, unleashed:
Dear All, esp Bill for pointing me in the right direction here...
I
Hei, here from Norway, I'm the mostly harmless guy, here comes the
norwegian votes.
I think you need to describe your photographic skills and background a
bit more, before we can offer you some help.
Are you familiar with the terms shutterspeed and aperture?
MaritimTim
2008/6/4 Jo Lueck [EMAIL
2008/6/4 willdo-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Alun,
hehe, I should have said Hi Willdo... :-)
Here's another:
http://picasaweb.google.com/don.donwilliams/Stack/photo#5207921563482660690
It was made in a rush as I have to leave for the city in half an hour. I
shouldn't have started this. The
I went from point and shoot - I know that the higher the shutter speed
the more light and I now know that the SV setting allows me to set it
so that it captures more light??
But really, that's it - green button, or fiddling are my friends!
On 4 Jun 2008, at 11:13, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Hei,
Hi Jo!
Another greeting from Norway.
Like Cotty said, I too had a green setting once. :-)
What went wrong with your puppy pics?
Best,
Jostein
PS. Nice name you have. Just a little short, that's all... :-)
2008/6/4 Jo Lueck [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dear All, esp Bill for pointing me in the right
The uneven focus on some DA* 16-50 lenses is a manufacturing defect
that plagued some early samples of this lens. I don't know if it can
be fixed. You should have returned it to the store where you bought
it. Hopefully, Pentax will replace it.
Paul
On Jun 4, 2008, at 12:13 AM, Mark Erickson
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/06/03 Tue PM 08:07:23 GMT
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: usb to scsi
So I need a dongle with a 25 pin female SCSI connector on one end
and
the standard USB plug on the other
This shouldn't be a meaningful
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Mark Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hate to be a buzzkill, but
I sent an FA* 300mm F4.5 lens back to Colorado for repair a few years ago.
It came back to me horrible mis-calibrated (blurry at all apertures), so I
sent it back. The second time I got
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/06/03 Tue PM 09:32:43 GMT
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: 60es style glasses ain't kool?
http://roman.blakout.net/?year=2008s=0category=portraitblog
=20080603145319
^^^ I like these glasses here, kinda balance
Manufacturing defect, yes, early samples, no. I'm seeing reports of
recent lenses with the same issue over on the flickr Pentax group I
moderate.
-Adam
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The uneven focus on some DA* 16-50 lenses is a manufacturing defect
We're not sure ~exactly~ what he did, but we're sure he did
~something~ wrong...
http://bp0.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/SEaMtOhUGkI/CNk/n8b0e600KBY/s1600-h/June_04_08+002.jpg
http://tinyurl.com/4ndl6y
Comments welcome.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A textural study ...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/84-water.jpg
Water - Sunnyvale 2008
Panasonic L1 + Olympus 25/2.8
ISO 1600 @ f/5.6 @ 1/1600 second
Comments, critique, etc.
The light, of course, makes it.
frank theriault wrote:
We're not sure ~exactly~ what he did, but we're sure he did
~something~ wrong...
http://bp0.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/SEaMtOhUGkI/CNk/n8b0e600KBY/s1600-h/June_04_08+002.jpg
http://tinyurl.com/4ndl6y
Oh, man. That looks expensive. Excellent photo as alway,
About flashing your puppies, try to save their eyes by using a little piece
of white carton at an angle in front of your on camera flash -- this
technique is called bouncing and makes the flash much less aggressive. The
idea is to angle the carton such that it makes the light travel up to the
Yes your mean ;-)
I tried to read it again today and I guess what I am looking for is how
to use guide for dummies, which is then even more simplified...
I am never going to be advanced with it, unless I can find a course -
the camera came with a how to course but I bought the camera in the
Awesome shot Mark.
Norm
Mark Roberts wrote:
Many things to do today but I thought I'd post one GFM photo before I
set out on my errands. This is Helen the GFM staff photog (and wannabe
motorcycle thief) on top of MacRae peak:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d802249a.jpg
K20D,
Take it easy, Jo. :-)
It's like a nut. You just need to find the right cracker of a
question. Keep asking. No questions are stupid, though some answers
may be...
Best,
Jostein
2008/6/4 Jo Lueck [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes your mean ;-)
I tried to read it again today and I guess what I am looking
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Jo Lueck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All, esp Bill for pointing me in the right direction here...
snip
Welcome to the list. This is a wonderful place to be, but please
remember this piece of advice:
Don't believe anything Cotty or Mark tell you.
Do that, and
Do Canadian police not mind having their photos taken?
Or didn't you wait around long enough to find out?
An interesting slice of life - well spotted!
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
On
You couldn't be in better hands, Jo. A wealth of experience imparted in a
patient, sympathetic manner is unique to this group.
As you may rightfully assume, I've taken full advantage of this mine of
expertise.
Jack
--- On Wed, 6/4/08, Jo Lueck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jo Lueck [EMAIL
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Awesome shot Mark.
For once, I must agree with Norm.
Great shot, Mark!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Fair enough, the camera itself can be daunting at first, even more so if you
didn't choose to have such a camera, but you can definitely make do without
taking care of most of the settings on the camera -- Putting the camera on
green or P, etc, can have very good results. Making the camera sort of
Don't encourage him, you'll become the star of an exposé
Jo Lueck wrote:
Oxford Oxford - you can practically move in and teach me yourself!!!
ANY help, bearing in mind I am allergic to manuals would help!
On 4 Jun 2008, at 09:33, Cotty wrote:
On 4/6/08, Jo Lueck, discombobulated,
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0806/08060301pentax17-70sdm.asp
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Sorry but:
Yawn.
Cheers,
Dave :-)
2008/6/4 Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0806/08060301pentax17-70sdm.asp
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
I like the photo overall, but the guy with the guitar case balancing
on the tip of a sheet of paper is kinda distracting.
G
On Jun 4, 2008, at 5:46 AM, frank theriault wrote:
We're not sure ~exactly~ what he did, but we're sure he did
~something~ wrong...
Yeah, please, no more OTs. Let's talk about that camping party in the old
mountain instead...
;-)
Jaume
- Mensaje original
De: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Enviado: miércoles, 4 de junio, 2008 16:05:16
Asunto: Re: smc PENTAX-DA
i think that's a fantastic news
best,
mishka
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:05 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry but:
Yawn.
Cheers,
Dave :-)
2008/6/4 Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0806/08060301pentax17-70sdm.asp
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
It's KAF3 (= SDM only).
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: smc PENTAX-DA 17-70mmF4AL[IF] SDM
i think that's a fantastic news
best,
mishka
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at
mike wilson wrote:
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/06/03 Tue PM 09:32:43 GMT
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: 60es style glasses ain't kool?
http://roman.blakout.net/?year=2008s=0category=portraitblog
=20080603145319
^^^ I like these glasses here,
:-D
What I mean is it's another lens in the 16-XX range. It does nothing
to excite me.
That it's almost time for bed :-)
Cheers,
Dave
2008/6/4 Jaume Lahuerta [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yeah, please, no more OTs. Let's talk about that camping party in the old
mountain instead...
;-)
Jaume
There's really no way of knowing when the offending lens groups were
assembled, especially if they were made ahead of time and QC didn't
catch them they could be salted throughout the production run.
Adam Maas wrote:
Manufacturing defect, yes, early samples, no. I'm seeing reports of
recent
I finally got the link also. Haven't seen any spam yet...
rg
On 6/3/08, Bruce Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gonz wrote:
I think it must just be an email address harvesting ploy. Just wait
for the spam...
Well, yes and no.
I downloaded this book last week. I got the d/l
Not yet satisfied, here are some software updates:
http://www.pentax.jp/english/support/
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Jostein. :-)
2008/6/3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Paul
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Awesome shot Mark.
For once, I must agree with Norm.
Now *that's* one for the quotes file!
Great shot, Mark!
Thanks to both of you.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Well, it finally gives Pentax a replacement for mid-range normal zooms
like the 28-105's, longer than the 16-50 or 18-55 but shorter and
better than the 18-250.
Gotta say I loved that range on the Sigma 17-70, and the fixed max
aperture is a nice feature (but I'd probably still prefer the extra
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:38 AM, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Awesome shot Mark.
For once, I must agree with Norm.
For once i';ll agree with Frank, agreeing with Norm.
I suppose that is one of many higher
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:33 AM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's really no way of knowing when the offending lens groups were
assembled, especially if they were made ahead of time and QC didn't
catch them they could be salted throughout the production run.
They send boxes of them
That said, it is a range that should be of interest to most
photographers. It produces the equivalent FoV/DoF that the Leica
14-50mm f/2.8-3.5 lens I have on 4/3 provides, or 28-100mm on a Nikon
F, which is the range that I've found to be most useful in my work.
G
On Jun 4, 2008, at 7:35
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:35 AM, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Jo Lueck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All, esp Bill for pointing me in the right direction here...
snip
Welcome to the list. This is a wonderful place to be, but please
remember this
But are they recent serial numbers or just recent purchases? I'd be surprised
if the defective copies were still making it out the door at Pentax. But I
guess anything is possible.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manufacturing
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do Canadian police not mind having their photos taken?
Or didn't you wait around long enough to find out?
Thats my bet.
Good shot Frank. Great expressions of concern or is it confusions.
Dave
An interesting slice of
I read, recent serial numbers...
On 6/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But are they recent serial numbers or just recent purchases? I'd be surprised
if the defective copies were still making it out the door at Pentax. But I
guess anything is possible.
Paul
--
forgot the link:
http://www.flickr.com/groups/pentaxdslrusers/discuss/72157605349647317/
Quote This copy had the highest serial number of any one I have seen,
yet they still don't have the QC problems on this lens fixed yet!
On 6/4/08, Fernando [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read, recent serial
Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I finally got the link also. Haven't seen any spam yet...
I got it within 5 minutes via an account which they're free to spam to
their heart's content.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
First you need is a quick course on exposure values and how they effect
the way your camera captures images. There used to be two parameters
that could be readily controlled, aperture and shutter speed, which were
adjusted to give the proper exposure. In addition higher shutter speed
can
I missed this first time around, not bad at all.
(Now why do I keep thing the phrase Top of the world, ma!, and then
the mountain explodes...)
Norm Baugher wrote:
Awesome shot Mark.
Norm
Mark Roberts wrote:
Many things to do today but I thought I'd post one GFM photo before I
set out
It's not difficult to find middle-aged bald straight Scandinavian or
western-European women here with glasses that doesn't sit well.
http://roman.blakout.net/r-rated/800x800-_TLN81540295.jpg
but I'll stick with others I like or always funny kids:
frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Awesome shot Mark.
For once, I must agree with Norm.
It's the end of the world as we know it.
Great shot, Mark!
cheers,
frank
--
Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser
SDM only according to the site. It would appeal to *ist D series owners
and manual focus only will turn some off. Then again a body only lasts
5 or 6 years in the digital world so who's still using a *ist D class
camera...
Dario Bonazza wrote:
I still use my ist D. Have thought about getting a 200 D, but after
using my D in China, and seeing the results, I put that thought on the
back burner.
Jim A.
SDM only according to the site. It would appeal to *ist D series owners
and manual focus only will turn some off. Then again
You didn't have to answer, it was a rhetorical/ironic question...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still use my ist D. Have thought about getting a 200 D, but after
using my D in China, and seeing the results, I put that thought on the
back burner.
Jim A.
SDM only according to the
I went from point and shoot - I know that the higher the shutter speed
the more light and I now know that the SV setting allows me to set it
so that it captures more light??
-
Jo, it's just the opposite: Higher shutter speed means the shutter is
open for a shorter period, letting in less
Where am I supposed to post, here, or down there where I have just
posted? --
AlunFoto wrote:
2008/6/4 willdo-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Alun,
hehe, I should have said Hi Willdo... :-)
Here's another:
http://picasaweb.google.com/don.donwilliams/Stack/photo#5207921563482660690
While wondering aimlessly around I dropped into the last local healthy
camera stores in my area, (if you stretch area quite a bit), and they
had a box of short dated 35mm film on sale at a dollar a roll, I scored
5 rolls of 36 exp. short dated TMY 400 at a buck a piece. Now I have to
dust off
That should be wandering... (damned spell checker).
P. J. Alling wrote:
While wondering aimlessly around I dropped into the last local healthy
camera stores in my area, (if you stretch area quite a bit), and they
had a box of short dated 35mm film on sale at a dollar a roll, I scored
5
Hi Jo: I'm Christine from Chicago I have a K10 too--I love it!!! It's a
great camera. Maybe I can help. I know you don't want to hear this, but
why don't you start reading p. 138 - 145 in your manual. These pages cover
Setting the Exposure, Setting the Sensitivity (in other words ISO),
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:23 AM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First you need is a quick course on exposure values and how they effect
the way your camera captures images. There used to be two parameters
that could be readily controlled, aperture and shutter speed, which were
adjusted
frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:23 AM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First you need is a quick course on exposure values and how they effect
the way your camera captures images. There used to be two parameters
that could be readily controlled, aperture and shutter
frank theriault wrote:
Well, that clarifies things...
;-)
Heck, I didn't even get into defraction...
(Jo, don't worry about it, nothing you need to care about right now or
probably ever).
frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:23 AM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23810400-2,00.html
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
Interesting, the lens contains not one but two composite, aspherical
elements, the composite aspherical element was the achillies heel of the
smcp FA 28-70mm f4.0 an otherwise exemplary little lens.
Dario Bonazza wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0806/08060301pentax17-70sdm.asp
--
Sure, it's another mid-range zoom. But even back in the film
days Pentax offered us a choice of 28-80 and 28-105 zooms.
This looks to be more desirable than the old 28-105 zooms; it's a
bit wider (after allowing for sensor size), and constant aperture.
But if I got one it wouldn't auto-focus
Asahi is the name of a river, a lot of different things are named after
it, much like say Washington. Washington Mutual Insurance has noting to
do with the Washington Nationals (baseball team), which has noting to
do with Washington and Lee University, except for the name...
Scott Loveless
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:15 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That should be wandering... (damned spell checker).
Ha Ha
:-)
Dave
P. J. Alling wrote:
While wondering aimlessly around I dropped into the last local healthy
camera stores in my area, (if you stretch area quite a bit),
Hey, without defraction how would we know where to cut de pie?
I think you meant diffraction:-)
Paul
(being a wise-ass)
-- Original message --
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
frank theriault wrote:
Well, that clarifies things...
;-)
Heck, I didn't
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:58 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Asahi is the name of a river, a lot of different things are named after
it, much like say Washington. Washington Mutual Insurance has noting to
do with the Washington Nationals (baseball team), which has noting to
do with
P. J. Alling wrote:
Washington Mutual Insurance has noting to
do with the Washington Nationals (baseball team), which has noting to
do with Washington and Lee University, except for the name...
Wow. I never would have figured that out on my own. You're gonna tell
me smoking is bad for
It's not in my spell checker and the suggestion was well, not appropriate...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, without defraction how would we know where to cut de pie?
I think you meant diffraction:-)
Paul
(being a wise-ass)
-- Original message --
From: P. J.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snipYou're gonna tell
me smoking is bad for me next, right?
WHAT?!?
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:58 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Asahi is the name of a river, a lot of different things are named after
it, much like say Washington. Washington Mutual Insurance has noting to
do with the Washington Nationals (baseball team),
Scott Loveless wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
Washington Mutual Insurance has noting to
do with the Washington Nationals (baseball team), which has noting to
do with Washington and Lee University, except for the name...
Wow. I never would have figured that out on my own. You're
welcome to the group!
rg2
On 6/4/08, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not in my spell checker and the suggestion was well, not appropriate...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, without defraction how would we know where to cut de pie?
I think you meant diffraction:-)
Paul
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 4:21 PM, drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
Last week we had a short camping holiday in Devon. At a little village
called Malmsmead in the area known as Doone Vally (after the book Lorna
Doone) we found a ford, the kids were desperate to have a paddle.
Gots another questions for the Mac crowd.
In the very near future I'm going to attempt to run OSX via a PowerPC
emulator on a PC with Linux. Sounds fun, don't it? In an effort to not
spend much money on this, because I'm not sure that I can get it to
work, what are my options for buying a
Jaume,
Lighten up and chill out!
Grandfather Mountain is a very cheap, high quality, 3 day photo seminar.
Cost was $115 this year, with no hotel costs if you camped out.
Compare this to other photo seminars you see in magazines.
These are the same presenters who run their own 3-5 day seminars at
First off, it's not a good idea performance-wise. There isn't a
PowerPC emulator with anything approaching decent performance, even on
a fast PC you're going to be looking at performance similar to a
PPC604e at best. You might be able to get a usable OS9 boot, but OS X
is gonna suck massively on
On Jun 4, 2008, at 10:41 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
Gots another questions for the Mac crowd.
In the very near future I'm going to attempt to run OSX via a PowerPC
emulator on a PC with Linux. Sounds fun, don't it?
Doesn't sound like fun to me at all. Sounds like a huge waste of
time. And
Adam Maas wrote:
First off, it's not a good idea performance-wise. There isn't a
PowerPC emulator with anything approaching decent performance, even on
a fast PC you're going to be looking at performance similar to a
PPC604e at best. You might be able to get a usable OS9 boot, but OS X
is
Axel,
I found a picasa album of yours.
I liked the picture of feeding the ducks the best.
You have some other nice ones as well.
The pix of the lane divider in the pool is too blurry for me.
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Axel Belinfante
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
faded swimming
We're not sure ~exactly~ what he did, but we're sure he did
~something~ wrong...
Obvious. he/she was driving a Chevy...
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Throw the Book at Him!
We're not
Scott,
We have a G3 that has been unemployed since we got our
G5 a few years ago. If you want it, it's yours.
Rick
--- Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Maas wrote:
First off, it's not a good idea performance-wise.
There isn't a
PowerPC emulator with anything approaching
On Jun 4, 2008, at 0:44, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
But you can buy the Canon Remote Switch RS-60E3 from BH Photo for
$25 that works perfectly as a replacement for the $40 Pentax CS-201,
or go to Ebay and find the same thing made in China for $4.
I personally wouldn't waste the time to make one.
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: K10D Back from Pentax Repair
Manufacturing defect, yes, early samples, no. I'm seeing reports of
recent lenses with the same issue over on the flickr Pentax group I
moderate.
I don't think there is any way of knowing when a lens was
- Original Message -
From: Jo Lueck
Subject: New to the group - you will be groaning with frustration soon!
Dear All, esp Bill for pointing me in the right direction here...
I have a K10D - its nice, its black, I have a really nice bag with it -
here my knowledge ends!
To
any man who can hitch the length and breadth of the galaxy, rough it,
slum it, struggle against terrible odds, win through, and still knows
where his towel is is clearly a man to be reckoned with.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
I've always thought it means 'sunrise'.
Asahi is the name of a river, a lot of different things are
named after
it, much like say Washington. Washington Mutual Insurance
has noting to
do with the Washington Nationals (baseball team), which has
noting to
do with Washington and Lee
I really want to master the basics.. and then take pictures
as great as
Bill!
that shouldn't take very long.
Welcome. I recommend that you find a class locally that will teach you
the basics. It will be much easier in 2 or 3 hands-on sessions than by
reading through all these
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:25 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: K10D Back from Pentax Repair
Manufacturing defect, yes, early samples, no. I'm seeing reports of
recent lenses with the same issue over on the flickr Pentax group
Asahi does translate as Morning Sun but it is a river, at one time I
had heard that water taken from that river could be used to develop BW
film with no additional chemicals, however either that wasn't true or
water quality has improved considerably since the 1950s.
Bob W wrote:
I've always
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
