I'm inclined to agree with Paul, here. There's something almost
tactile about the reflection and the surface of the water.
I certainly wouldn't over-tweak it. I think it has plenty to recommend
it, as-is.
-- Walt
On 9/16/2010 5:54 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:35
Interesting I guess.
http://k-rumors.com/new-schneider-kreuznach-tilt-shift-lenses-with-k-mount/
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs
--
Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45,
DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ ...
Laptop: Macbook 13 Unibody
About time I guess. Still, nothing beats Canon's new T/S lens offerings =(
Cheers
Ecke
2010/9/17 Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com:
Interesting I guess.
http://k-rumors.com/new-schneider-kreuznach-tilt-shift-lenses-with-k-mount/
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs
--
Missed the other thread - I have a coupon here, multiple use also
possible, for a free German language DVD containing photography
workshops featuring a bunch of star pros. Anyone going there and wants
it, let me know. It is yours in exchange for postage for a second DVD
sent to me. Or for free if
It'd be English I'd be interested but german, really is not for me ;)
btw, reading your post I first read 'porn stars' instead of star
pros', I guess I should sleep a bit more :D
Probably the habit of seeing such words on my kids' PC screens (in classroom).
--
Thibault Massart aka
2010/9/17 Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com:
It'd be English I'd be interested but german, really is not for me ;)
btw, reading your post I first read 'porn stars' instead of star
pros', I guess I should sleep a bit more :D
Probably the habit of seeing such words on my kids' PC screens (in
Lots of pro forma approvals, I guess. Lots of euros as well.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:00 AM, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote:
About time I guess. Still, nothing beats Canon's new T/S lens offerings =(
Cheers
Ecke
2010/9/17 Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com:
Interesting I guess.
2,800 and 2.700 euros and both on the long end!
(There's a reason why the original Pentax was a 28mm.)
I could buy a dedicated computer for perspective corrections.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:58 AM, Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting I guess.
From: eckinator
2010/9/15 Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com:
I agree. ?I don't understand why the newspaper insisted on
investigating and reporting on this either. ?He was a good
photographer, and took some great images of the civil rights movement.
?I am confident nothing he told the
Totally useless, given the DOF achievable in APS-C format and
PhotoShop perspective controls.
Paul
On Sep 17, 2010, at 3:58 AM, Thibouille wrote:
Interesting I guess.
http://k-rumors.com/new-schneider-kreuznach-tilt-shift-lenses-with-k-mount/
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs
From: Daniel J. Matyola
Burning human rights and civil liberties on the altar of national security is
certainly not what the founding fathers had in mind.
That is hardly an accurate description of what happened in this case.
I think Theoharis is comparing what's happening today to Hoover's
The 90's actually quite useful as it's a Macro, DoF control is still
an issue for those uses.
Note Schneider already makes a 28 T/S in K mount.
-Adam
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:00 AM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Totally useless, given the DOF achievable in APS-C format and
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
The selected images now are all those images which have not been
included in a collection. You can mark them all with a custom label
... Not-In-Collection or something like that
But in doing that, don't they then become a collection of sorts?
Philosophically speaking
From: David J Brooks
Thanks for the comments everyone.
Just curious, do any of you find the slow sync type shots effective at all.?
Occasionally.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
From: Steven Desjardins
Let me clarify. I'm not as upset with Withers as I am with Hoover.
I'm an American citizen and taxpayer and they still have a large
building in DC named after that @#...@#. As long as he is honored in
that fashion he's fair game. Not that I feel strongly about this .
From: eckinator
About time I guess. Still, nothing beats Canon's new T/S lens offerings =(
Cheers
Ecke
2010/9/17 Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com:
Interesting I guess.
http://k-rumors.com/new-schneider-kreuznach-tilt-shift-lenses-with-k-mount/
I'd settle for the Hartblei Super-Rotator.
On Sep 17, 2010, at 9:18 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Steven Desjardins
Let me clarify. I'm not as upset with Withers as I am with Hoover.
I'm an American citizen and taxpayer and they still have a large
building in DC named after that @#...@#. As long as he is honored
in
that fashion
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 6:06 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
The selected images now are all those images which have not been
included in a collection. You can mark them all with a custom label
... Not-In-Collection or something like that
But in doing
Yeah, PS can fix perspective without a shifting lens. But there is no
way to later emulate lens tilt which selectively alters the plane of focus
with PS. That has to be done with the lens tilt in camera.
--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Join the CD PLAYER DISC Discussions :
http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2010/09/painting_in_water.html
Dan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
When you have the DOF of APS-C you don't usually need to emulate tilt,
since focus is broad. But as Adam pointed out, the 90mm is a macro, so
tilt is advantageous for that application.
Paul
On Sep 17, 2010, at 10:00 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
Yeah, PS can fix perspective without a shifting
2010/9/17 P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net:
[...] So far no one has impinged on
my freedom to live the way I choose, so I'm content.
Yes and no. Do you know how much they know about you? Do you know if
your political views are on record anywhere?
It does make a difference and if you work
On Sep 17, 2010, at 12:24 PM, eckinator wrote:
2010/9/17 P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net:
[...] So far no one has impinged on
my freedom to live the way I choose, so I'm content.
Yes and no. Do you know how much they know about you? Do you know if
your political views are on record
2010/9/17 P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net:
I have thought about it. I've also thought about the need for national
security. I'm content with the compromises that have to be made to secure
the latter.
*Advocatus diaboli mode on* please define national security - where do
you draw the
On 9/17/2010 3:58 AM, Thibouille wrote:
Interesting I guess.
http://k-rumors.com/new-schneider-kreuznach-tilt-shift-lenses-with-k-mount/
These would be a boon to architectural photographers, except that even
on 35mm film the focal length's are a bit long to be really useful. On
APS-C sized
I'm looking for a very small camera bag. Older the better as long as
it's still usable.
Looking for something to fit my Pentax Program Plus with 50mm
attached, a couple rolls of film, a filter or two and maybe (but not
necessarily) a second small lens.
I don't want velcro, I do want some padding
From: P N Stenquist
On Sep 17, 2010, at 9:18 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Steven Desjardins
Let me clarify. I'm not as upset with Withers as I am with Hoover.
I'm an American citizen and taxpayer and they still have a large
building in DC named after that @#...@#. As long as he is
On 9/16/2010 9:52 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
You can get a Canon Canonet QL17 for $50-125. Or a Minolta HiMatic 7.
Or any one of a number of other fixed lens rangefinder cameras in this
price bracket from Olympus, Konica, Ricoh, Petri, Yashica etc. The key
is to be sure that you get one which
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 7:50 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sep 16, 2010, at 5:27 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Thanks for the comments everyone.
Just curious, do any of you find the slow sync type shots effective at
all.?
I like them, but better framing would make them
From: J.C. O'Connell
Yeah, PS can fix perspective without a shifting lens. But there is no
way to later emulate lens tilt which selectively alters the plane of focus
with PS. That has to be done with the lens tilt in camera.
Actually you can do that in Photoshop too. Google photoshop lensbaby
My constant compainion back in the mid 1960's was a Yashica Lynx 14
with a 1.4 lens. Great little rangefinder
Bill
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/16/2010 9:52 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
You can get a Canon Canonet QL17 for $50-125. Or a Minolta
impossible. you cant change image DOF after the fact.
you may be able to do some minor fiddling but
if the fstop was near wide open and not tilted
to match a tilted subject, there is no way to
get the suject totally in focus without a tilt
used at time of exposure.
--
J.C. O'Connell
The selected images now are all those images which have not been
included in a collection. You can mark them all with a custom label
... Not-In-Collection or something like that
But in doing that, don't they then become a collection of sorts?
Philosophically speaking ... ;-D
they've done it again - the Church of Situp Cycling:
http://flavors.me/situpvancouver
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Bob W wrote:
Russell's Lightroom paradox: is the collection of all collections, a
collection?
Can I make Lightroom show the set of all collections that do not
contain themselves?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
Let me look through what I have. I am looking to sell or dispose of a
mound of camera bags stacked about three feet high and five feet long.
Give me rough dimensions of what you're looking for in inches ...
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm
You can fake less DoF but not more. The popular 'miniature effect' is
what John was referring to, not the more constructive use of the
Scheimpflug effect to increase DoF.
-Adam
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:44 PM, J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
impossible. you cant change image DOF after
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Bob W wrote:
Russell's Lightroom paradox: is the collection of all collections, a
collection?
No, it is a Collection Set.
Can I make Lightroom show the set of all collections that do not
contain themselves?
It is
frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Collin Brendemuehl
coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
http://www.brendemuehl.net/images/ebay/sp500a.jpg
http://www.brendemuehl.net/images/ebay/sp500b.jpg
http://www.brendemuehl.net/images/ebay/sp500c.jpg
The problem is there is no popular outlet for newly discovered history
that is not also a news outlet.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:55 AM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sep 17, 2010, at 9:18 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Steven Desjardins
Let me clarify. I'm not as upset
Give me rough dimensions of what you're looking for in inches ...
you stole my pickup line!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On Sep 17, 2010, at 12:36 PM, eckinator wrote:
2010/9/17 P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net:
I have thought about it. I've also thought about the need for national
security. I'm content with the compromises that have to be made to secure
the latter.
*Advocatus diaboli mode on* please
Boris Liberman wrote:
On 9/16/2010 9:52 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
You can get a Canon Canonet QL17 for $50-125. Or a Minolta HiMatic 7.
Or any one of a number of other fixed lens rangefinder cameras in this
price bracket from Olympus, Konica, Ricoh, Petri, Yashica etc. The key
is to be sure
Bob W wrote:
The selected images now are all those images which have not been
included in a collection. You can mark them all with a custom label
... Not-In-Collection or something like that
But in doing that, don't they then become a collection of sorts?
Philosophically speaking ...;-D
John Sessoms wrote:
From: Steven Desjardins
Let me clarify. I'm not as upset with Withers as I am with Hoover.
I'm an American citizen and taxpayer and they still have a large
building in DC named after that @#...@#. As long as he is honored in
that fashion he's fair game. Not that I feel
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Can I make Lightroom show the set of all collections that do not
contain themselves?
It is mathematically impossible. Breaks the assumption of identity in
the definition of a set. See Set Theory
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed, Canonet looks pretty attractive and eekbay is full of them.
I really enjoyed mine. Nice lens and a fun shooter. I used it
extensively on my honeymoon in Paris:
http://www.coneslayer.org/gal/honeymoon/
The BW
We've already got one, you see.
http://s2.hubimg.com/u/2740605_f520.jpg
(They say they've already GOT one!)
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
I'll bet even this would be a lot less expensive if you can find one...
Why would you want one ? its not a tilt/shift.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: 50 and 90mm
When leadership is ultimately determined at the ballot box, the interests
of
the ruling party will eventually and inevitably come to reflect the
interest of
the public -- even if there are temporary diversions from a logical
course. Of
course there are the paranoid few at both fringes who
On Sep 17, 2010, at 3:00 PM, Bob W wrote:
When leadership is ultimately determined at the ballot box, the interests
of
the ruling party will eventually and inevitably come to reflect the
interest of
the public -- even if there are temporary diversions from a logical
course. Of
course
From: Adam Maas
You can fake less DoF but not more. The popular 'miniature effect' is
what John was referring to, not the more constructive use of the
Scheimpflug effect to increase DoF.
-Adam
The other scheimpflug EMULATION - Helicon Focus - uses multiple
exposures with the plane of sharp
From: J.C. O'Connell
impossible. you cant change image DOF after the fact.
you may be able to do some minor fiddling but
if the fstop was near wide open and not tilted
to match a tilted subject, there is no way to
get the suject totally in focus without a tilt
used at time of exposure.
Sure
When leadership is ultimately determined at the ballot box, the
interests
of
the ruling party will eventually and inevitably come to reflect the
interest of
the public -- even if there are temporary diversions from a logical
course. Of
course there are the paranoid few at both
I really enjoyed mine. Nice lens and a fun shooter. I used it
extensively on
my honeymoon in Paris:
http://www.coneslayer.org/gal/honeymoon/
The BW shots are from the Canonet and the color shots are from my Canon
A-1, except in Reims (Champagne cellars) where the roles are reversed.
On Sep 17, 2010, at 13:10, Bob W wrote:
Give me rough dimensions of what you're looking for in inches ...
you stole my pickup line!
You stole my joke!
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
From: Bob W
Not naive, realistic. If the leadership doesn't get results, it doesn't
survive
long term. So far it's worked, both here and in your country.
Paul
the naivety is in the use of terms like 'eventually' and 'long term'. The
result of the manipulation that goes on can be seen in
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
you stayed at the Hotel Daguerre! How was it?
Yes, I've stayed there on all 3 of my visits to Paris. The first time
was on the recommendation of a colleague, for an astronomy conference
at l'Observatoire de Paris, which is
2010/9/17 Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com:
The problem is there is no popular outlet for newly discovered history
that is not also a news outlet.
That is not a problem but a goodness looking at how many people follow
some kind of news to some extent as opposed to how many people take an
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:43 -0400, Bill Owens wmbow...@gmail.com
wrote:
My constant compainion back in the mid 1960's was a Yashica Lynx 14
with a 1.4 lens. Great little rangefinder
I have one of those, but I'm not sure that 'little' is the correct
adjective.
:-)
Cheers
Brian
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 02:02 -0500, Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm inclined to agree with Paul, here. There's something almost
tactile about the reflection and the surface of the water.
I certainly wouldn't over-tweak it. I think it has plenty to recommend
it, as-is.
I just got the estimate from C.R.I.S. to repair my DA* 16-50's SDM
motor: $229! :O
That's about a third of what I paid for the damn thing, and it was in
for SDM repair just last winter!
This is utter bullshit. I used the lens exactly twice between getting
it fixed and discovering the AF wasn't
Some time ago, I was in Key West, enjoying a drink and watching sunset
fall over the harbor. I tried to capture the feel of the scene, but I
had difficulty with the lighting, object in the foreground and the
effects of alcohol.
These are the two best of the images I saved. I am trying to decide
2010/9/17 paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net:
When leadership is ultimately determined at the ballot box, the interests of
the ruling party will eventually and inevitably come to reflect the interest
of the public -- even if there are temporary diversions from a logical
course. Of
You should pass this on to Ned Bunnell.
2010/9/17 John Celio n...@neovenator.com:
I just got the estimate from C.R.I.S. to repair my DA* 16-50's SDM
motor: $229! :O
That's about a third of what I paid for the damn thing, and it was in
for SDM repair just last winter!
This is utter
#394 is my first choice. Would actually choose #393 if not for the foreground.
Love the lighting.
Jack
--- On Fri, 9/17/10, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Subject: PESOs: Key West at Sunset
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
you stayed at the Hotel Daguerre! How was it?
Yes, I've stayed there on all 3 of my visits to Paris. The first time was
on the
recommendation of a colleague, for an astronomy conference at
l'Observatoire de Paris, which is within walking distance.
I've liked the hotel just fine, and
John Celio wrote:
I just got the estimate from C.R.I.S. to repair my DA* 16-50's SDM
motor: $229! :O
That's about a third of what I paid for the damn thing, and it was in
for SDM repair just last winter!
This is utter bullshit. I used the lens exactly twice between getting
it fixed and
Matthew Hunt wrote:
I've liked the hotel just fine, and haven't had a reason to look
elsewhere. The rates have always been reasonable. Breakfast is often
included in your rate (croissants, yogurt, fruit, etc.). The rooms
are small, but clean, and have private, modern bathrooms. The staff
Ok, they've been worn out for longer than some here have been alive.
But I decided to put the FA50/1.4 on a tripod and shoot it against
Will post links later. Have class tonight.
1. Super Tak 55/1.8
2. Praktika Pentacon 50/1.8
Results:
1. Nothing compares to the FA. It is far and away so
Almost forgot: The Pentacon does tend to underexpose a half stop.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
it's on da bay.
My price was too high. :-(
And really, guys, those jokes are pretty lame.
(na na na!)
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I second the Canon GIII QL17.
But I think with some careful shopping you can find a good one for $25 to $40.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
It's kinda hard guessing at numbers.
But playing around with a tape measure I'm thinking something around
8x4x4. Give or take some.
I'm very interested to see what you've got!
~nick
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me look through what I have. I
http://s857.photobucket.com/albums/ab138/drd1135/PDML/?action=viewcurrent=sun200.jpg
K7, m200, f8, 1/500 iso 400 on a monopod. I'm pleased with the result for $79.
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Forgot to mention, this is a full pixel crop with NO PS manipulation.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
http://s857.photobucket.com/albums/ab138/drd1135/PDML/?action=viewcurrent=sun200.jpg
K7, m200, f8, 1/500 iso 400 on a monopod. I'm pleased with the
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
Give me rough dimensions of what you're looking for in inches ...
you stole my pickup line!
You stole my joke!
Neither of you are getting my boyfriend. ]'-)
--
Godfrey
godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
PDML
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Can I make Lightroom show the set of all collections that do not
contain themselves?
It is mathematically impossible.
Funny you should bring this up, Boris, as for the past 4-6 weeks I've
been thinking of buying a Bessa R3A + Voigtlander 40mm f/1.4. I'm not
crazy about film, but I'm wanting to shoot something simple for street
stuff. The above combo can be purchased for under $1k new in the US,
although I'd buy
that's not minor fiddling, that's major fiddling
--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Join the CD PLAYER DISC Discussions :
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdsound/
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
good information, thanks. It would be nice to test/compare
the other three 50mm's K/M/A F/1.4 too.
--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Join the CD PLAYER DISC Discussions :
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdsound/
-Original
On 18 September 2010 09:42, J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
that's not minor fiddling, that's major fiddling
Not these days John, I focus bracket, HDR bracket and shoot panos as a
matter of course. It's a case of making the best of the available
options.
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image
I dont need no stinkin' focus bracketing,
I still manual focus nearly perfectly.
Do you focus bracket because the camera's
AF just isnt good enough to rely on?
If you want to combine a bunch of images
together, thats your perogitive, but
its not the same as getting what you
need with a single
On 18 September 2010 10:22, J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net wrote:
I don’t need no stinkin' focus bracketing,
I still manual focus nearly perfectly.
Do you focus bracket because the camera's
AF just isnt good enough to rely on?
Good for you John, obviously my response regarding focus
Where's Monty Hall when you need him. Come to think of it, where's
Carol Merryl (sp?)?
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2010/09/pick-door.html
Falls into the I don't know why it's funny, but it is category - at
least for me it does.
Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
cheers,
frank
--
Messing with Photoshop again. Found a tutorial on luminosity masking
adjustment layers and thought I'd play around with it to see if I can do
anything with it.
First effort is a photo I took along side the highway just south of
Telluride, CO back in 2007.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
they've done it again - the Church of Situp Cycling:
http://flavors.me/situpvancouver
Well, we've got to do ~something~ during those long, cold, dark winters...
;-)
Mind you, Vancouver has mild, wet winters (so what better
On Aug 4, 2010, at 17:24, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Nothing really spectacular. Just a scene from the harbour in Antwerp,
Belgium:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/21951847
All I get is:
Hier wurde ein Foto gelöscht
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson -
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
Funny you should bring this up, Boris, as for the past 4-6 weeks I've
been thinking of buying a Bessa R3A + Voigtlander 40mm f/1.4. I'm not
crazy about film, but I'm wanting to shoot something simple for street
stuff. The
Thanks, Jack.
Yes, the foreground is the big problem with the cruise ship image. It
is a very ugly dock. It each image, my subject was the sun, and the
ships are really there to give the sun something to reflect on, so to
speak.
Dan
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Jack Davis
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
#394 is my first choice. Would actually choose #393 if not for the
foreground. Love the lighting.
Yeah, too bad about that ugly wharf or whatever it is at the bottom of
393; other than that it would be a spectacular photo.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Aug 4, 2010, at 17:24, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Nothing really spectacular. Just a scene from the harbour in Antwerp,
Belgium:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/21951847
All I get is:
--
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Animaux Sauvages! Photos from the Canadian Rockies!
A gallery of snaps from last weeks trip to Canada:
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/banff2010/index.html
Had I but known. I just got back from a trip to
JCO,
Sorry. I just compared what I had on hand.
I would be nice to do a full scope.
In the end I was really surprised, and pleased,
to see this quality out of a DDR lens.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
Strange..very strange! There must, also, be a PM pot.(?)
Jack
--- On Fri, 9/17/10, frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
From: frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com
Subject: PESO - Pick a Door
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Date: Friday, September 17, 2010, 5:50 PM
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:13 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
When leadership is ultimately determined at the ballot box, the interests of
the ruling party will eventually and inevitably come to reflect the interest
of the publicsnip
You're living in a fantasy world, Paul.
Pleased you should be. An excellent photo. And I've always liked that
lens. It's a keeper.
Paul
On Sep 17, 2010, at 5:42 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
http://s857.photobucket.com/albums/ab138/drd1135/PDML/?action=viewcurrent=sun200.jpg
K7, m200, f8, 1/500 iso 400 on a monopod. I'm pleased
On Sep 17, 2010, at 11:25 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:13 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
wrote:
When leadership is ultimately determined at the ballot box, the
interests of the ruling party will eventually and inevitably come
to reflect the interest
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:25 PM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
You're living in a fantasy world, Paul. The interests of the ruling
party have come to reflect the interests of the corporations who pay
billions in campaign contributions and for lobbyists in Washington and
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:33 PM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
That's fringe paranoia. No one is compelled to vote based on cpr[prate
campaign contributions or the opinions of lobbyists. And they don't. If they
had, McCain would have won here.
That's not fringe paranoia,
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
