Very interesting and effective.
Dan
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
G'day all
An exercise in grime and texture
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP1250peso.html
Comments, of course, most welcome.
Cheers
Brian
On 27 January 2011 03:25, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
I want a program to high-light the discrepancies and tell me:
This file is here on this drive, but it's there on that drive.
OR
This file is here on this drive, but it's not on the other drive.
OR
These two files have
- Mensaje original
De: SV Hovland pdml...@heime.org
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Enviado: jue,27 enero, 2011 00:27
Asunto: RE: New Pentax 18-135: any experiences?
It's a lot better built than DA18-55. In fact, it feels quite solid. It has
some barrel distortion
Sasha, on one hand I quite like it, yet I see that the background (what
is behind the branchy tree branch) is busy. On the far right there is
half a tree and slightly upwards and to the left of it there is a
vertical tree trunk that disrupts the geometry somewhat.
Hope that makes at least
Somehow I misread the title to be A Plateful of Flamingoes...
Seriously... Had to make a mental effort to re-read it...
On 1/27/2011 2:41 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
The Lamington is an Australian icon so it just wouldn't be Australia Day
without a few.
Here's a plateful of small ones.
Too rich to my blood...
On 1/27/2011 2:00 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
http://chadrichard.typepad.com/timelapse/2008/06/how-to-make-an.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
It definitely works for this specific viewer...
On 1/26/2011 11:35 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
http://drd1135.smugmug.com/Photography/pdml/15174580_NVzVH#1168802686_YesyP-A-LB
Great big snowflakes today.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Of course clarity isn't always necessary, but there are certainly occasions
when it is required. (I don't think I'll last long if I start sending soft
photos of cars to my auto clients.) Good equipment is necessary to deliver
everything that a photographer has to do. And better equipment -- as
Based on Brian's suggestion, I took some off the left, then I decided
to crop the car off the right and made the photo a vertical. What to
you think:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2011/01/bay-street-another-take.html
for comparison, here's the original:
I kind of prefer the original. The wider context does not hurt here.
On 1/27/2011 2:30 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Based on Brian's suggestion, I took some off the left, then I decided
to crop the car off the right and made the photo a vertical. What to
you think:
I narrowly prefer the original, but the hard backlight doesn't seem to work
well here. The detail-free figures aren't interesting enough in themselves.
Paul
On Jan 27, 2011, at 7:30 AM, frank theriault wrote:
Based on Brian's suggestion, I took some off the left, then I decided
to crop the
It was an odd thing that seemed to fix it. I reset both router and modem about
10 times, in different orders, to no avail. The router was working, but would
not receive info from the modem. I finally just gave up and sat in the living
room with a laptop on my lap and starting watching TV. Five
Larry,
Very encourging! The early pictures in the set are stunners.
Your edting shows.
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
A couple of weeks ago, I went on a roadtrip to LA. The trip was supposed to
continue on to Texas to visit my sister, but
Excellent pictures, Larry. You were selective enough in my eyes. I
should say that your write up intrigued me. In fact, I have to realize
that I would surely like to invite more people from the list to come
over if even just to be shown the country so that we can take pictures
together. I
A truly excellent gallery. Well done.
Paul
On Jan 27, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Excellent pictures, Larry. You were selective enough in my eyes. I should say
that your write up intrigued me. In fact, I have to realize that I would
surely like to invite more people from the
My favorite as well...
That's a mighty big rhododendron in the second hot as well!
I thought it was two evergreens at first.
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Some nice shots. I especially like the church with the long walkway and lamp
Original
Dave
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:30 AM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Based on Brian's suggestion, I took some off the left, then I decided
to crop the car off the right and made the photo a vertical. What to
you think:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
A truly excellent gallery. Well done.
Paul
Agreed
Dave
On Jan 27, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Excellent pictures, Larry. You were selective enough in my eyes. I should
say that your write up
It is, ever green, it's just not an evergreen...
On 1/27/2011 9:51 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
My favorite as well...
That's a mighty big rhododendron in the second hot as well!
I thought it was two evergreens at first.
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Paul
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
I'm not sure I have the patience for this but maybe...
That article was written back in 2008, so while the principles still
apply, the tools to accomplish it have gotten a lot better:
On Jan 26, 2011, at 8:11 PM, steve harley wrote:
safe enough is entirely relative; it sounds like all your backups are in
one place and you do some of them manually -- what would be the consequences
of a mistake or omission of your manual backup? of a flood or a fire? how
much it matters
On Jan 26, 2011, at 21:15, Eric Weir wrote:
On Jan 26, 2011, at 9:38 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
I'm going to keep trying. At 14F degrees last night, my fingers were
stiffening up after the first 45 minutes. My wife and daughter run downtown
at the Metrodome (RIP) on Tuesday/Thursday
Oh, now there's an insult...
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:46 AM, William Robb
anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/01/2011 10:19 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Steven Desjardins
If you have a Porsche you still have to drive it. It doesn't mean
that a better driver won't do better in the
You know those things don't really like the cold.
I'm suprised to see it in te snow.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:59 AM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
It is, ever green, it's just not an evergreen...
On 1/27/2011 9:51 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
My favorite as
Talk to one of the local building's security staff.
If they let you in, you would be warm and could wait for the bird' return.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Jan 26, 2011, at 21:15, Eric Weir wrote:
On Jan 26, 2011, at 9:38 PM,
On 11-01-27 12:23 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Jan 26, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Too much clarity can spoil a shot. Very often you need to hide as much as you
reveal; submerge it in the shadows, unsaturate, untint or lower its contrast,
or defocus it; all reduce clarity.
Clarity:
On Jan 27, 2011, at 9:24, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Talk to one of the local building's security staff.
If they let you in, you would be warm and could wait for the bird' return.
Too many bums, prostitutes and crack dealers in this neighborhood. I don't
think there are a lot of open doors for
that works for me
ann
frank theriault wrote:
Based on Brian's suggestion, I took some off the left, then I decided
to crop the car off the right and made the photo a vertical. What to
you think:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2011/01/bay-street-another-take.html
for comparison, here's
http://krg.pagesperso-orange.fr/collection/ps-pe2.htm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
It is medical in nature. The olympus mount piece in the last picture
makes me think it was designed for photomicroscopy.
A 110 square format. Interesting.
Oh, and if anybody wants one:
http://cgi.ebay.com.sg/Pentax-PS-PE-II-Camera-/380307418796?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0hash=item588c16aeac
--
PDML
Geez, I hope they sanitized it.
On 1/27/2011 11:13 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
It is medical in nature. The olympus mount piece in the last picture
makes me think it was designed for photomicroscopy.
A 110 square format. Interesting.
Oh, and if anybody wants one:
From: Larry Colen
OK, then working autofocus, or any focus, not necessary. Image
stabilization, not necessary. You are hereby forbidden from
criticizing a photo for poor focus, motion blur, or any lack of
clarity.
Larry,
When you go out on a limb, be careful which side you're sawing off.
Charles,
Think about the Office Management folks.
There are often building manager groups responsible for
maintenance, cleaning, security, etc. on site.
They could be your friends...
It's not about keeping warm. It's about having a hide from the birds.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at
Yep, its an endoscopic camera:
On 11-01-27 11:27 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Larry Colen
OK, then working autofocus, or any focus, not necessary. Image
stabilization, not necessary. You are hereby forbidden from
criticizing a photo for poor focus, motion blur, or any lack of
clarity.
Larry,
When you go out on a limb, be
I think this crop and slight lightening is an improvement. I would remove that
thing on the sidewalk sticking into the frame on the lower right.
Jack
--- On Thu, 1/27/11, frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
From: frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com
Subject: PESO - Bay
Le 27/01/2011 17:33, Darren Addy a écrit :
...
If you want to collect everything with Pentax's name on it and you
include the medical field, you will be collecting for a looong
time.
No, only unusual cameras !
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thanks Boris.
Much appreciated.
--S
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Sasha, on one hand I quite like it, yet I see that the background (what is
behind the branchy tree branch) is busy. On the far right there is half a
tree and slightly upwards and to the
This one should come in handy the next time a Pentax product's price
sticks in your craw.
:)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Boy that thing is big to be inserted in your . . .
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
This one should come in handy the next time a Pentax product's price
sticks in your craw.
:)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
It appears that the French have their own similar expression: ela me
reste coince en travers de la gorge
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
This one should come in handy the next time a Pentax product's price
sticks in your craw.
:)
--
PDML
My real objection is generalizations like equipment doesn't matter.
For some shots it doesn't matter and for some it does. My opinion is
that for a great majority it does make a difference. Better equipment
is far less likely to be inappropriate for a particular photographic
situation than lousy
On Jan 27, 2011, at 8:27 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Larry Colen
OK, then working autofocus, or any focus, not necessary. Image
stabilization, not necessary. You are hereby forbidden from
criticizing a photo for poor focus, motion blur, or any lack of
clarity.
Larry,
When you go out
Google translated this as ela me remains stuck in the craw. Given
the subject, I'm not sure I want more details.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
It appears that the French have their own similar expression: ela me
reste coince en travers de la gorge
Have you ever seen the Lester Dine 105mm lenses and ring flashes?
Those were specifically designed for dental photography, and they
aren't small by any means.
Lester Dine actually created (or had them made for them) ring flashes
for dental work, way back in 1952. Sunpak rebadged some of their
From: Eric Featherstone
On 27 January 2011 03:25, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
I want a program to high-light the discrepancies and tell me:
This file is here on this drive, but it's there on that drive.
OR
This file is here on this drive, but it's not on the other drive.
Le 27/01/2011 17:58, Darren Addy a écrit :
It appears that the French have their own similar expression: ela me
reste coince en travers de la gorge
Exactement !
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
If I'm not mistaken the endoscopic part would be small and connected
to the camera's mount by means of fiber optics. The image is normally
round (which is why the 110 format is square). I'm guessing that if
you put a normal 35mm lens on it, it would more than cover the image
format, so would no
On Jan 27, 2011, at 6:23 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Excellent pictures, Larry.
Thank you Boris, and to everyone else who commented.
You were selective enough in my eyes. I should say that your write up
intrigued me. In fact, I have to realize that I would surely like to invite
more people
From: Jeffery Smith
It was an odd thing that seemed to fix it. I reset both router and
modem about 10 times, in different orders, to no avail. The router
was working, but would not receive info from the modem. I finally
just gave up and sat in the living room with a laptop on my lap and
starting
On Jan 27, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
Who will notice me first: The birds, or the police?
Maybe the birds. As has been mentioned already, crows are very smart.
--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA USA
Most likely a mis-match of the authentication certificates, which age
out and are replaced dynamically. There are ways to force the refresh.
Hard to say based on your description, but the important thing is that
it's all working now. Once things work, they tend to stay working. :-)
Godfrey
On
Whatever the case, if someone has the same issue, we need to tell them to give
up, sit, and just stare at the screen for a while...and a miracle will occur!!!
Jeffery
On Jan 27, 2011, at 11:39 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Jeffery Smith
It was an odd thing that seemed to fix it. I reset
From: Charles Robinson
On Jan 26, 2011, at 21:15, Eric Weir wrote:
On Jan 26, 2011, at 9:38 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
I'm going to keep trying. At 14F degrees last night, my
fingers were stiffening up after the first 45 minutes. My
wife and daughter run downtown at the Metrodome (RIP)
From: Bob Sullivan
Oh, now there's an insult...
Nah! Sticks 'n stones ... Besides, I'm still better looking.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:46 AM, William Robb
anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/01/2011 10:19 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Steven Desjardins
If you have a Porsche
From: Larry Colen
On Jan 27, 2011, at 8:27 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Larry Colen
OK, then working autofocus, or any focus, not necessary.
Image stabilization, not necessary. You are hereby forbidden
from criticizing a photo for poor focus, motion blur, or any
lack of clarity.
Larry,
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:05:54 -0800, Larry Colen wrote:
If I were more careful about what I said, my writing would be much less
interesting to read.
Now *that's* a Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
On 2011-01-27 06:26 , Jeffery Smith wrote:
Five minutes later, my blank internet screen had a popup that said Do you want to connect to
*%$@^%* (some sort of jibberish).
um, are you sure you didn't just connect to a neighbor's open wifi network?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
From: P. J. Alling
Geez, I hope they sanitized it.
On 1/27/2011 11:13 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
It is medical in nature. The olympus mount piece in the last picture
makes me think it was designed for photomicroscopy.
A 110 square format. Interesting.
Oh, and if anybody wants one:
On 2011-01-27 08:11 , Eric Weir wrote:
On Jan 26, 2011, at 8:11 PM, steve harley wrote:
1) have Aperture backup photos to a FireWire disk as it load them to from my SD
card to my drive (LR can do this too, i assume)
I'm rarely hardware connected to the other drive. I backup to it manually
On 26 January 2011 16:50, Peter McIntosh peter...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
It's time to update the ist-DL with something better. To this end,
I'm going camera shopping this Saturday. A K5 body and grip are
definitely on the list, and I'm seriously considering the new 18-135
zoom to go
On 23 January 2011 12:50, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
I'd rather have a lens that makes life worth living.
MARK!
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 11-01-27 12:03 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
My real objection is generalizations like equipment doesn't matter.
For some shots it doesn't matter and for some it does. My opinion is
that for a great majority it does make a difference. Better equipment
is far less likely to be inappropriate
On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On 11-01-27 12:03 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
My real objection is generalizations like equipment doesn't matter.
For some shots it doesn't matter and for some it does. My opinion is
that for a great majority it does make a difference.
On 27 January 2011 17:17, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Hmmm, sounds like you want /usr/bin/diff and use diff -r to compare
two folder (on two drives) recursively down the folder structure. That
will tell you pretty much what you've asked for above (but not
graphically.)
However
No, the damned neighbors all have their WiFi routers secured. I ended up using
the Cisco router that had its base station name given to me by Cisco
(GoldPanda).
Jeffery
On Jan 27, 2011, at 12:23 PM, steve harley wrote:
On 2011-01-27 06:26 , Jeffery Smith wrote:
Five minutes later, my blank
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Paul Stenquist
pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On 11-01-27 12:03 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
My real objection is generalizations like equipment doesn't matter.
For some shots it doesn't matter and for some it
Get a longer lens. : + }
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com
Subject: Re: PESO: Crows
On Jan 27, 2011, at 9:24, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Talk to one of the local building's security staff.
If
On 24/01/2011, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net wrote:
On Jan 23, 2011, at 4:33 AM, Bob W wrote:
On PDML Discussion is our middle name (for values of middle ≥ -1,
≤ 2 )
Yeah, I've noticed. Freaked me out when I first joined up and
immediately started receiving 200-300 messages a day.
On Jan 27, 2011, at 3:13 PM, mike wilson wrote:
PSTFUML?
Pentax shut theI'm sure you get the gist..list
Thanks, Mike. I was apprised of it off list. As I said to that person, in my
case I imagine sometimes people wish they *had* chosen that name. -;)
On Jan 27, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Paul Stenquist
pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:51 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On 11-01-27 12:03 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
My real objection is generalizations like equipment
If I were more careful about what I said, my writing would be much less
interesting to read.
True for a lot of the 'Marks'
MARK!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
Subject: Re: What gear is on your
On 11-01-27 12:05 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
If I were more careful about what I said, my writing would be much less
interesting to read.
So you're saying that clarity is actually undesirable.
fx ricochet /fx
:-)
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
G'day all
Only a couple more days to submit for the February PUG.
Theme: Life's Simple Pleasures
or Open Gallery
Submit form here:
http://pug.komkon.org/submit/
Submission Guidelines here:
http://pug.komkon.org/general/PUG-Guidelines.html
(which also explains how to submit via email if you
C'mon, Boris, that's New Zealand Day.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Somehow I misread the title to be A Plateful of Flamingoes... Seriously...
Had to make a mental effort to re-read it...
On 1/27/2011 2:41 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
The Lamington is
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: What gear is on your short list?
On 11-01-27 12:05 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
If I were more careful about what I said, my writing would be much
#1 Tamron Adaptall 2 PKA mount. $100
#2 Tamron SP 500/8 misc spots inside. With front cap hood. $50
Plus shipping.
PayPal accepted.
Later tonight they go on eB.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
http://kerygmainstitute.org
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:12:59 -0500
From: P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: GESO -- Between the storms
Message-ID: 4d40c69b.5020...@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
I've been going a
At least that's what the instruction sheet calls it.
Turns screw mount Pentax lens into a telescope.
Could also be used on current Pentax bayonet mount lens with screw thread
adaptor.
Bought from Cambron, I used it a few times with a 300mm screw mount lens
which effectively became a 30 power
DA* 200/2.8
DA* 55/1.4
Sigma 30/1.4
That's all.
One long lens to get the job done. 12MP cropped is still a lot of information.
I love the DS* 55/1.4 for its image rendering.
And the Sigma seems to be the only choice in that focal length.
Oh, and maybe another Canon G-III QL17. Just to have in
At that price, the 500/8 is a steal :)
Almost the price of a cap (a big one I admit).
It is the best mirror lens ever made.
2011/1/27 Collin Brendemuehl coll...@brendemuehl.net:
#1 Tamron Adaptall 2 PKA mount. $100
#2 Tamron SP 500/8 misc spots inside. With front cap hood. $50
Plus
Gundlach 4x5 camera. Excellent condition. $200
includes 2 lens boards.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=220728177239ssPageName=STRK:MEUSX:IT
Rodenstock Ysarex 135/2.5. Later model. Super sharp. $150.
Caltar HR 210/5.6. $250.
This is a Topcor and performs almost as well as
My Gawd I broke PDL! Never cut paste in haste. You'd think I hadn't
been using computers for the last 20 yrs.
Sorry this was worse than misspelling cormorant!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
It is a pity that auction had ended as I would have been seriously tempted. I
already have the 35mm version (MF-1).
Paul
On 28/01/2011, at 3:13 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
It is medical in nature. The olympus mount piece in the last picture
makes me think it was designed for photomicroscopy.
A
On 28 January 2011 05:45, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
I played around with this lens for 5 minutes in a darkish expo hall.
Had I done this at a store and had a wad of cash in my pocket, I would
have been impressed enough to purchase the lens. Had this lens been
around when I bought my
At 9:04 PM + 1/27/11, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
#1 Tamron Adaptall 2 PKA mount. $100
#2 Tamron SP 500/8 misc spots inside. With front cap hood. $50
Geez...I wish I'd waited. I paid $225 for mine last month...with a Nikon mount!
X;{
--
Steve Sharpe
d...@eastlink.ca
On 11-01-27 4:38 PM, Don Guthrie wrote:
My Gawd I broke PDL! Never cut paste in haste. You'd think I hadn't
been using computers for the last 20 yrs.
Sorry this was worse than misspelling cormorant!
Well, you better have it fixed by the time the night-shift arrives or
there'll be hell to
Colin,
What do you mean by misc spots? Dust, imperfections in coating, holes ?
You would pack it like an egg?
John -- WA1JG
wa...@nsradio.org
On 1/27/2011 4:04 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
#1 Tamron Adaptall 2 PKA mount. $100
#2 Tamron SP 500/8 misc spots inside. With front cap
On Jan 27, 2011, at 7:28 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On 11-01-27 12:23 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Jan 26, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
You and I differ on a definition then. I define lack of clarity by all of the
antonyms of clarity. You define lack of clarity as simply unsharp.
Someone got them both.
Spots include dust and condensation that I can see.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
http://kerygmainstitute.org
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
-Original Message-
From: John Graves
On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:54 PM, Peter McIntosh wrote:
On 28 January 2011 05:45, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
I played around with this lens for 5 minutes in a darkish expo hall.
Had I done this at a store and had a wad of cash in my pocket, I would
have been impressed enough to purchase
On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:14 PM, kwal...@peoplepc.com kwal...@peoplepc.com
wrote:
At least that's what the instruction sheet calls it.
Turns screw mount Pentax lens into a telescope.
Sounds like fun. How is it different than putting the lens on a camera to use
as a telescope? More
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Sounds like fun. How is it different than putting the lens on a camera to
use as a telescope? More magnification?
No focusing screen in the way and a full exit pupil (which is round,
not rectangular).
--
PDML
there are also tons of other tools such as antitwin and (commercial,
hugely expensive an powerful) altova diffdog and araxis merge (hint
hint)
cheers
ecke
2011/1/27 Eric Featherstone eric.featherst...@gmail.com:
On 27 January 2011 17:17, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Hmmm, sounds
On 28 January 2011 09:46, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote:
there are also tons of other tools such as antitwin and (commercial,
hugely expensive an powerful) altova diffdog and araxis merge (hint
hint)
Windiff, Winmerge http://winmerge.org/ etc
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio)
Gee, Larry, thanks for that imagery. I'm envious as well, however.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:54 PM, Peter McIntosh wrote:
On 28 January 2011 05:45, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
I played around with this lens for 5
Looks like a crop of dodgy sensors afflicting some K5's - I presume this
is the 'dust' syndrome I have read about?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/1101/11012706pentaxk5service.asp
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Paul Stenquist
pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
... You're right of course. I didn't meant to imply that I'd rather shoot
with a Barnack Leica. They're a pain. What I meant was that neither the Leica
nor the Fuji would serve me very well as a photographic tool,
On 28 January 2011 10:39, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
Looks like a crop of dodgy sensors afflicting some K5's - I presume this
is the 'dust' syndrome I have read about?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/1101/11012706pentaxk5service.asp
Well that's positive news, no obfuscation or dismissal in
One has come available to me.
Anyone out there have/use one?
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
http://kerygmainstitute.org
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
