On 9/11/2011 8:38 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Sep 11, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Heh. Work with ISO 1600 and especially 3200 for a while. You'll see noise all
right.
I can imagine. I very, very rarely go that high with my K-x, so I figure I
won't even try with the K100D. I do like
Many thanks, Steven.
It does look like it's been through a rough storm, doesn't it? We
haven't really had anything significant around here since June, though.
I'm at a loss as to why it's in that kind of shape. But, I do think
it's a much more interesting looking flower that way.
-- Walt
* The calibration is slightly awkward, particularly if you have a big
lens on. Makes me feel like I'm gonna drop it... :-/
The guy I was shooting with today was quite amused, watching me juggle my
camera to get the thing calibrated. You don't need to do the physical
calibration for GPS tagging
Beautiful, Ken! Congrats too. cheers, Christine
On Sep 9, 2011, at 2:47 PM, wrote:
> I might have posted this image before, but I post it now to show an image
> that was awarded second place in the color category at a recent local gallery
> show. Around 150 images were entered in B+W and c
Thanks for posting. Darrel & I really enjoyed this. Cheers, Christine
On Sep 9, 2011, at 9:58 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Wow. Just wow.
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14792580
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pd
Don't know much about the R3000. I've seen the hot/cold press natural/bright
white paper but haven't tried them yet. Cheers, Christine
On Sep 11, 2011, at 4:51 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
>
>
> Thank you Godfrey, for the response and congratulations!
>
> My brother just bought the R3000, and
Very cute! Cheers, Christine
On Sep 10, 2011, at 7:05 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Muddlety on the right and Fenway on the left:
> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/kitties.jpg
>
> We got them from local animal rescue group a week ago - they were
> approximately 12 weeks old. After having been with
Thanks for posting, Joseph! Cheers, Christine
On Sep 6, 2011, at 7:34 PM, Joseph McAllister wrote:
> Noe Dewitt, a fashion photographer and resident of lower Manhattan was the
> person who took the photos with the 67II and a Polaroid 600E. His girlfriend
> was Kerrie, an art director. I spent
Excellent gallery! Thanks for all your work, Brian. Cheers, Christine
On Sep 9, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
> G'day all
>
> The September PUG is now up and a top gallery it is too - everything
> from the conventional to the obscure and one or two mildly
> disturbing
>
> There
On 12 September 2011 10:51, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> Is the version of Camera Raw that you are using running process 2010
> or process 2003 code? That could be the issue you're seeing. The
> Camera Raw raw conversion routines were significantly improved with
> the introduction of Camera Raw v6.
Caught this on a walk in the woods. Cheers, Christine
http://aguilapaw.posterous.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 11/09/2011 7:29 PM, Peter Loveday wrote:
* The calibration is slightly awkward, particularly if you have a big
lens on. Makes me feel like I'm gonna drop it... :-/
- Peter
The guy I was shooting with today was quite amused, watching me juggle
my camera to get the thing calibrated. You d
On 11/09/2011 6:54 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Long story short, I'm getting one for my birthday. Yes, I'm stoked. I showed
Zab the astro photos from the link yesterday and despite it being a bit outside
our initial budget, she seemed to think that it would make a much better
birthday present than
Believe it or not, this vehicle belongs to the heavy metal karaoke
singer from an earlier PESO:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14097852 . The car matches
the man.
Dan
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> 545
That undergrowth be mature corn. Over the which I was not tall enough to see.
We (my neighbor and I) chose the site because of the barn. We wanted a long
view, over a field, something interesting (like the barn) mid-distance, with
the moon low in the sky. But we miscalculated a bit plus there wa
On 12 September 2011 09:55, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> So why was this reference to film brought up at all? Films have not
> changed substantively since 1996 or so.
>
Now, now, Godfrey, you're not trying to mess with my mind are you?
You brought up the subject of comparison with film, even after
I really don't care much what Google has heard of. I just want to see
what the issue is.
Mark !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
Subject: Re: Pentax K-Q adapter and an OT rant about corporate silliness
I r
DFS?
Sorry, Dark-Frame Subtraction.
The lack of multiple exposures seems annoying.
Could it have something to do with the movement limitations of the sensor?
I certainly wouldn't expect it to be able to exceed the total duration (ie
movement limits) over all the shots. But within the, say,
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
Subject: Re: Pentax K-Q adapter and an OT rant about corporate silliness
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Anthony Farr wrote:
I couldn't find a camera with the 10MP Panas
Really well done exposure balance. If only the barn were somewhat more
prominent. The undergrowth gets in the way, but my guess is it's
considered needed to obstruct some unwanted feature(s).(?)
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Stan Halpin
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Cc:
Sent: Sund
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: Muddlety and Fenway
Ken Waller wrote:
Cute, cute, cute !
Are they litter mates ? Same sex?
Yep. Littermates. They're both male (orange tabbies are almost alway
On Sep 11, 2011, at 6:41 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> On 9/11/2011 7:46 PM, Anthony Farr wrote:
>> On 12 September 2011 07:12, John Sessoms wrote:
>>> When I moved out of my apartment I had a brand-new, unopened set of 4 AA
>>> Lithium batteries. I know exactly which pocket, in which camera bag I p
On Sep 11, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Peter Loveday wrote:
>> A) Has anyone on the list been recently shopping for one? Any
>> strong recommendations on places to check out, or to avoid?
>
> Bought mine here in Oz, so I can't help you there. But some observations:
>
>
>> B) Has anyone that has one ru
>From earlier this evening: http://smhalpin.posterous.com/harvest-moon
The previous two entries in the blog include a color and a B&W version of an
egret. Comments on any or all are welcome.
stan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to U
On Sep 11, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
>>
>> Heh. Work with ISO 1600 and especially 3200 for a while. You'll see noise
>> all right.
> I can imagine. I very, very rarely go that high with my K-x, so I figure I
> won't even try with the K100D. I do like the camera a lot, though. I
On 9/11/2011 7:46 PM, Anthony Farr wrote:
On 12 September 2011 07:12, John Sessoms wrote:
When I moved out of my apartment I had a brand-new, unopened set of 4 AA
Lithium batteries. I know exactly which pocket, in which camera bag I put
them in.
They're not there. They're not in any of my came
On Sep 11, 2011, at 6:01 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> ... Oh come on Godfrey, you know that wasn't meant as an attack.
>
> The way you wrote it could be considered an ad hominem attack. As long
> as you want to comment on my writing style,
Some other notes:
* Even though it's hotshoe mounted, it doesn't prevent all flash usage. The
PC sync socket still works fine, and in conjunction with an appropriate
hotshoe cable set, I can use my 540FGZ (off-camera) in PTTL just fine.
Using the GPS off camera likely would work too, but that
A) Has anyone on the list been recently shopping for one? Any
strong recommendations on places to check out, or to avoid?
Bought mine here in Oz, so I can't help you there. But some observations:
B) Has anyone that has one run into critical problems that made them
decide that it wasn't rea
Littermates make nice pets. We had a pair a while back and they were
so good together.
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:26 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
> Very nice
>
> Dave
>
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>> Muddlety on the right and Fenway on the left:
>> http://www.robertstech
I like a lot, Walt. It looks almost wind blown.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As you can see, I've adopted a minimalist image titling convention. It
> simplifies things.
>
> Aside from that, having packed up and shipped off my K-x to have the
> viewfinder gl
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> ... Oh come on Godfrey, you know that wasn't meant as an attack.
The way you wrote it could be considered an ad hominem attack. As long
as you want to comment on my writing style, I'll comment on yours, ok?
> ... your writing style is not alw
Wow. Another escalation of tangental rhetoric.
if you look at the mu43 forums or rumor sites, you do see some that
have elevated the high iso issue to the former status of MP. It can
be pretty maddening simply because they can't see past it. Of course
it matters for most and for some it's criti
Long story short, I'm getting one for my birthday. Yes, I'm stoked. I showed
Zab the astro photos from the link yesterday and despite it being a bit outside
our initial budget, she seemed to think that it would make a much better
birthday present than the large capacity battery for my cordless
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Anthony Farr wrote:
> That was an unanticipated consequence of the permissions that I'd set
> for this album. The direct links to the pictures don't let you
> navigate away from them to other restricted pictures. If you want to
> toggle between pictures this link
On Sep 11, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> I only ever use my computer to write plain ASCII text, so this desire for
>> fast clocks speeds and graphical interfaces, to me, utter and complete
>> nonsense.
>
> So stick with a L
On 12 September 2011 09:43, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> I really don't care much what Google has heard of. I just want to see
> what the issue is.
>
I suggested Google to illustrate that it was a known issue, not
something I'd invented for the sake of an argument.
> Sorry, trying to look at a JPEG
On 9/11/2011 3:47 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On 11-09-10 7:24 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
As you can see, I've adopted a minimalist image titling convention.
It simplifies things.
Aside from that, having packed up and shipped off my K-x to have the
viewfinder glass (hopefully) replaced (h
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I only ever use my computer to write plain ASCII text, so this desire for
> fast clocks speeds and graphical interfaces, to me, utter and complete
> nonsense.
So stick with a Linux or UNIX system running in the terminal. Why
complain about
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Anthony Farr wrote:
> That was then and this is now. I'm not comparing my camera's
> performance against film in 2001, I'm comparing it against its direct
> competitors sold at the same time.
So why was this reference to film brought up at all? Films have not
ch
On 12 September 2011 07:12, John Sessoms wrote:
> When I moved out of my apartment I had a brand-new, unopened set of 4 AA
> Lithium batteries. I know exactly which pocket, in which camera bag I put
> them in.
>
> They're not there. They're not in any of my camera bags. They're not
> anywhere in t
I really don't care much what Google has heard of. I just want to see
what the issue is.
Sorry, trying to look at a JPEG image at this size is just about
useless to see "shadow banding" ... I can't see anything from
comparing the unprocessed image to the processed one with these tools
other than
Tell he you know exactly where they were, but SOMEONE moved them. Also, don't
tell her when you do find them exactly where you really put them.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Tim Bray
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: Frustration
The only thing that could make this worse is a spouse, saying in an
understanding tone of voice "Where did you seem them last?"
-T
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> As is invariably the case with me, you'll find them, eventually, exactly
> where you put them.
>
> Jack
>
>
>
Spyder3 pro works fine with multiple monitors, I have a couple
different outboards that I plug into my mac and they're all hunky
dory. The software is kind of clumsy and stupid to use, but it gets
you there. -T
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
>
>
> Hello All!
>
> There man
On 2011-09-11 17:54, Igor Roshchin wrote:
1. What I cannot understand is whether Pro or Elite can handle multiple
monitors, and if they do, - how do they do this: do they create separate
profiles for each monitor?
Spyder 3 Pro supports multiple monitors, each with their own profile.
--
Thank
5450 must be a police code for some sort of drug violation.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 2:39 PM
Subject: PESO: AAK
http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=main&webtag=djm1963&entry=13
As is invariably the case with me, you'll find them, eventually, exactly where
you put them.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: John Sessoms
To: pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 2:12 PM
Subject: Frustration & Aggravation - part 26
When I moved out of my apartment I had
On Sep 11, 2011, at 5:30 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
> We talked about lenses but there is something needed in bodires.
> I was remimded of this recently when my son got his hands
> on a Fiji GA645. I had forgotten how nice that vertical frame
> was for shooting people.
You can rotate the cam
Hello All!
There many useful suggestions and responses to my question about screen
calibrators last month.
I've got a step closer to buying one in the sense that I think I
narrowed my choice to 2-3 models:
Spyder3 Pro or Elite
and
X-rite i1Display Pro or i1Display 2.
As far as I understand, th
Thank you Godfrey, for the response and congratulations!
My brother just bought the R3000, and I was helping him to figure out
certain things.
I was surprised that
1) how few profiles are available for it for download on Epson website:
http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/support/supAdvice.jsp?BV
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 12:19:28PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
> Very cool. I've never seen a steam roller that actually ran on steam before.
You need to get out more :-)
This one is a regular at Pacific Coast Dream Machines:
http://www.jfwaf.com/PAW/PAW.php?name=PAW0720&style=1&year=2007
P
http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=main&webtag=djm1963&entry=131
Comments are invited.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
We talked about lenses but there is something needed in bodires.
I was remimded of this recently when my son got his hands
on a Fiji GA645. I had forgotten how nice that vertical frame
was for shooting people.
What Pentax could do is (a) rotate the frame to a vertical
orientation or (b) create a s
On 11 September 2011 18:42, Stan Halpin wrote:
..
> More to the point for this group - if you like doing stage photography, or if
> you would like to give it a try, these guys are very open. I could probably
> arrange a VIP pass for you if you are interested.
>
> stan
> --
I
From: Bruce Walker
On 11-09-11 3:18 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Sep 10, 2011, at 10:19 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Overall, though, this obsession with ultra high ISO settings and the
desire for noiseless results is, to me, utter and complete nonsense.
I only ever use my computer to write plain
When I moved out of my apartment I had a brand-new, unopened set of 4 AA
Lithium batteries. I know exactly which pocket, in which camera bag I
put them in.
They're not there. They're not in any of my camera bags. They're not
anywhere in this house that I can think to look.
I'll have to go to
If I minded questions or comments, I wouldn't throw photos to the
wolves here. No, that last one was pretty underexposed, so I just
cranked the exposure and also the Lightroom "Fill light" slider. A
touch of negative Clarity for glowiness. Interestingly the white
balance is also as-shot; I twid
On 11-09-10 7:24 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
As you can see, I've adopted a minimalist image titling convention.
It simplifies things.
Aside from that, having packed up and shipped off my K-x to have the
viewfinder glass (hopefully) replaced (hopefully) under warranty, I
broke out the
On 11-09-10 2:12 AM, Tim Bray wrote:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2011/09/07/The-Drive-by-Night
Low-light photography is so easy these days. When I was a kid we had
to fling individual photons at the Tri-X and try for an even grain
pattern. -T
I really like the 3rd one, Tim. Did y
On 11-09-11 1:07 PM, Anthony Farr wrote:
On 12 September 2011 00:20, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I've never seen this "shadow banding" stuff, or at least I don't
recognize what you mean. Can you provide an example?
You'r very lucky to have never seen it. Google has heard of it.
You'll find plent
On 11-09-11 3:18 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Sep 10, 2011, at 10:19 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Overall, though, this obsession with ultra high ISO settings and the
desire for noiseless results is, to me, utter and complete nonsense.
I only ever use my computer to write plain ASCII text, so thi
Very cool. I've never seen a steam roller that actually ran on steam before.
On Sep 11, 2011, at 3:22 AM, mike wilson wrote:
> Nothing more than video snapshots, all about 90s or less. K-x and 18-55 with
> a rather sticky zoom ring, it appears.
>
> Let's see if this works.
> http://www.you
On Sep 10, 2011, at 10:19 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
>
> Overall, though, this obsession with ultra high ISO settings and the
> desire for noiseless results is, to me, utter and complete nonsense.
I only ever use my computer to write plain ASCII text, so this desire for fast
clocks speeds
On 12 September 2011 00:20, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> There were never any 35mm films with ISO 800 or above that were as
> grainless as most people obsessed with ultra high ISO sensitivity seem
> to want to see these days. Nearly any DSLR class sensor camera made
> since 2004 outperforms all ISO
Heck Rick,
Can't you just run over to Bryce Canyon over lunchtime?
Regards, Bob S. (it's a nice picture too!)
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
> Good idea! Get me the time off and the money, and I'll head right out there!
>
> Rick
>
>
> --- On Sun, 9/11/11, Bob W wrote:
>>
Meg's nephew Dave Harding and his "Alt Country" rock band (Richmond Fontaine)
will be back in the UK Sept 15-27, then across the channel for another 5
nights. Later in October they'll be back over for another three weeks, with
several dates in Spain, then on to Germany, Denmark, Norway, Sweden,
On 12 September 2011 01:25, John Sessoms wrote:
>
> All *obsession* is ridiculous ... except for my own of course.
>
Exactly. Obsession is a character flaw in other people. I, on the
other hand, am passionate about certain matters.
regards, Anthony
"Of what use is lens and light
to tho
Good idea! Get me the time off and the money, and I'll head right out there!
Rick
--- On Sun, 9/11/11, Bob W wrote:
> >
> > Another from the Art Gallery of Ontario:
> >
> > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14149416
>
> you could probably get some shots of that staircase that
> would
On 12 September 2011 00:20, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> I've never seen this "shadow banding" stuff, or at least I don't
> recognize what you mean. Can you provide an example?
>
You'r very lucky to have never seen it. Google has heard of it.
You'll find plenty of references there. Frank Theriau
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
David Savage wrote:
I actually use the D700's high ISO a lot (many of my star shots make
use of that cameras capabilities), so for me the desire for low noise
@ high ISO isn't complete nonsense.
Actually, I was about
On 9/11/2011 9:44 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
I have not been doinga lot of photography this summer, the shed is
keeping me busy, but we do have some sunflowers maturing in the yard
now.:
This one must be a rouge seed from the feeder:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14191113
Triple heads,
Thanks, Dave.
It's a pretty old, banged-up lens and there's absolutely zero snap in
the aperture ring. But, thankfully, it's an A lens, and I tend to shoot
in Av mode more than any other when the option is feasible. It's a bit
of a brute, not all that great as walking-around lens. But, I ma
On 9/11/2011 5:59 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Sep 10, 2011, at 4:24 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/6134029469/
ISO 800, f/4.5, 1/500, Av
Very nice!
Thanks, Larry!
But, I'm a contrarian.
That, my friend, is the understatement of the week.
I do tend to w
> -Original Message-
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
>
> Another from the Art Gallery of Ontario:
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14149416
you could probably get some shots of that staircase that would make a nice
pair with pictures f
I have not been doinga lot of photography this summer, the shed is
keeping me busy, but we do have some sunflowers maturing in the yard
now.:
This one must be a rouge seed from the feeder:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14191113
Triple heads, the squirrels cut the top off of this one a w
On 12 September 2011 00:21, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> BTW, Anthony, why are you debating about low-end Olympus DSLRs on the
> PDML list?
> --
Dario mused that he'd like to see an m43 MILC with a Sony sensor. He
expressed the view that Sony's superior sensor technology would "blow
away" Panasonic
I like this one a lot.
Dave
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As you can see, I've adopted a minimalist image titling convention. It
> simplifies things.
>
> Aside from that, having packed up and shipped off my K-x to have the
> viewfinder glass (hopefully) rep
Yes it is.:-)
Nice geometry here.
Dave
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
> Another from the Art Gallery of Ontario:
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14149416
>
> (K7, DA 16-45)
>
> Rick
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailma
As noted in the comments, that image was taken with my M42 screw mount
SMC Takumar 50 mm f/1.4, which was the only lens I had for the first
two months, until the PX could special order a super takumar 135mm
f/3.5 and a super takumart 28mm f/3.5 for me.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com
Very nice
Dave
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Muddlety on the right and Fenway on the left:
> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/kitties.jpg
>
> We got them from local animal rescue group a week ago - they were
> approximately 12 weeks old. After having been with us for a we
BTW, Anthony, why are you debating about low-end Olympus DSLRs on the
PDML list?
--
Godfrey
godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Anthony Farr wrote:
> But I don't see that it's about obsession with speed, it's about
> defining a camera's limits of performance. It's not like the
> "good ole days" when we could throw a faster film into a camera
> on spec, if a digital camera doesn't have good
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> David Savage wrote:
>
>>I actually use the D700's high ISO a lot (many of my star shots make
>>use of that cameras capabilities), so for me the desire for low noise
>>@ high ISO isn't complete nonsense.
>
> Actually, I was about to mention you
David Savage wrote:
>I actually use the D700's high ISO a lot (many of my star shots make
>use of that cameras capabilities), so for me the desire for low noise
>@ high ISO isn't complete nonsense.
Actually, I was about to mention you as an example of someone who
really does need and use high ISO
Ken Waller wrote:
>Cute, cute, cute !
>
>Are they litter mates ? Same sex?
Yep. Littermates. They're both male (orange tabbies are almost always
male). Ther're replacements for our Siamese guy who died at age 17 in
June (after years with diabetes, asthma and various GI disorders) and
our orange t
Another from the Art Gallery of Ontario:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14149416
(K7, DA 16-45)
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the direct
Very nice.
We've got two 16-year old cats (one of them somewhat incontinent) if you ever
want to trade.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Sat, 9/10/11, Mark Roberts wrote:
> From: Mark Roberts
> Subject: Muddlety and Fenway
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Saturday, Septem
On 11 September 2011 21:31, Anthony Farr wrote:
> regards, Anthony
>
>"Of what use is lens and light
> to those who lack in mind and sight"
>(Anon)
>
>
Please forgive me for starting with my sig. It was but a simple cut &
paste error
regar
regards, Anthony
"Of what use is lens and light
to those who lack in mind and sight"
(Anon)
On 11 September 2011 15:19, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
>
> Easy to obtain higher ISOs: set the highest and underexpose by the
> number of stops req
Nothing more than video snapshots, all about 90s or less. K-x and 18-55
with a rather sticky zoom ring, it appears.
Let's see if this works.
http://www.youtube.com/user/bardzodobra#p/u
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCR
On Sep 10, 2011, at 4:24 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As you can see, I've adopted a minimalist image titling convention. It
> simplifies things.
>
> Aside from that, having packed up and shipped off my K-x to have the
> viewfinder glass (hopefully) replaced (hopefully) under warran
On Sep 11, 2011, at 1:19 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Anthony Farr wrote:
>> I couldn't find a camera with the 10MP Panasonic sensor that could
>> reach iso6400. Olympus 410 and above, 510 and above and the Panasonic
>> DMC-L10 all top out at iso1600. The Olym
On 11 September 2011 16:31, Bob W wrote:
>> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
>> Godfrey DiGiorgi
> [...]
>> Overall, though, this obsession with ultra high ISO settings and the
>> desire for noiseless results is, to me, utter and complete nonsense.
>>
>
> Mar
On 11 September 2011 18:31, Bob W wrote:
>> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
>> Godfrey DiGiorgi
> [...]
>> Overall, though, this obsession with ultra high ISO settings and the
>> desire for noiseless results is, to me, utter and complete nonsense.
>>
>
> Mar
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> Godfrey DiGiorgi
[...]
> Overall, though, this obsession with ultra high ISO settings and the
> desire for noiseless results is, to me, utter and complete nonsense.
>
Mark!
And I kind of agree with you. It's always seeme
> >I had honestly forgotten that I had used that image in a previous PUG,
> >and I don't like to take images of myself, so I dredged up one from my
> >old Asahi Spotmatic.
>
> Hay mate - for style, the words 'self portrait taken in my F4 Phantom'
> is pretty hard to beat!
>
f1.4 would be better
On 10/9/11, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I had honestly forgotten that I had used that image in a previous PUG,
>and I don't like to take images of myself, so I dredged up one from my
>old Asahi Spotmatic.
Hay mate - for style, the words 'self portrait taken in my F4 Phantom'
i
On Sep 10, 2011, at 8:05 PM, Cotty wrote:
> I have to say that this gallery is one of the best, if not THE best
> gallery I have ever seen from such a talented collection of
> photographers. Each one is simply brilliant. Seriously every single one
> of them is superb - congratulations all.
I agre
On Sep 11, 2011, at 10:11 AM, John Francis wrote:
>Apache/1.3.41 Server at www.komkon.org Port 80
>
>
> What that appears to be saying is that the request sent by my browser
> (IE8) includes a header field that is too long. It also displays what
> is probably the header record in question,
100 matches
Mail list logo
