It's a very hilly town.
Mike looks a bit tired - what did you do to him?
B
> On 19 Sep 2014, at 02:44, "knarf" wrote:
>
> Tilt? Looks perfectly level to me...
>
> Lovely photo, Mark. Most pix of Dr. Lisa are.
>
> Cheers,
>
> frank
>
>> On 18 September, 2014 7:51:15 PM EDT, Jeffery Johnson
These have been most fascinating threads showing much emotion. But the world
moves on & clearly from a business perspective it makes no sense to look
back. The K1000D is but a pipedream. If people really want to use pre-"A"
lenses, they can easily work in M mode and use Sunny 16 like we all did
Quoting John Celio :
Ricoh is not going to bring back the aperture simulator. Give it up
and stop whining about it already!
Supporting old lenses is not good for business, no matter how many old
farts like JCO try to insist otherwise. Ricoh is in the business of
selling cameras and NEW lenses,
Quoting "P.J. Alling" :
Sadly I agree with Cotty, the FF camera will be Ricoh branded,
mirrorless with a newly developed lens mount similar to and
electrically compatible with the KFA mount, and an adapter that will
allow all K mount lenses to be used at the proper register distance.
The
On Sep 15, 2014, at 8:53 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Another image from my shoot in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan last June.
> Taken, around sunrise on a cloudy morning.
>
> K3, 70-210mm f4-5.6 F @ 200mm, .3 sec @ f8.0, 200 ISO.
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17858760
Oh, wow! I l
We already knew *THAT*! 8-D
On 9/18/2014 4:23 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
_Think_. I don't _think_.
Thank you crappy auto-highlight-and-delete edit function!
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
But what is also interesti
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Alan C wrote:
> If people really want to use pre-"A"
> lenses, they can easily work in M mode and use Sunny 16 like we all did long
> ago (& waste no film).
Pentax has actually given us a lot more than that. Most everyone knows
that the Green Button can be set to
Alternatively, since the existing folder already has the name you want
to use, could you move the contents of the new folder into it & use it
that way?
On 9/18/2014 9:10 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
On Sep 18, 2014, at 6:17 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
I'm not a LR user so I can't answer the questions
I realize that this feature goes back to some Pentax film cameras
since the mid-80s, but it (along with Hyper Program) is another
example of a great Pentax innovation that is kept under the radar by
the inscrutable marketing of Pentax.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
> On Fri,
You shouldn't be trying to carry beer & a camera at the same time.
You'll spill the beer!
On 9/18/2014 8:16 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Jeffery Johnson wrote:
On 9/18/2014 6:44 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
From our Pennine Way hike a couple of weeks ago. I couldn't get myself
in the picture even wi
Just like the vast majority of todays lenses are the 18-55s? I dont
think so.
On 9/18/2014 6:27 PM, Bill wrote:
On 17/09/2014 10:14 PM, JC OConnell wrote:
there are literally MILLIONS of K and M lenses out there because Pentax
was a VERY hot selling brand
in the old SLR days of the late 70's ea
Thanks for commenting Bruce, Attila, Chris, Michael and Eric and others who
looked.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Walker"
Subject: Re: PESO - 'Morning Reeds'
Gorgeous minimalism, Ken. Frame-worthy.
On Mon, Sep 15,
Lovely sunrise, nice layers.
On 9/18/2014 9:27 PM, knarf wrote:
Nice thing about this time of year is the sun rises at a very civilized hour.
I've mixed feelings about this one. Colours, clouds and comp are okay but the
noise is a bother. Mind you sometimes it reminds me of pointilism so it fe
Jack Davis wrote:
>Considering the camera angle, are we to believe it was just two pints of beer,
>Mark. :)
Well, they were British pints.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml
But remember the K-01 was developed under Hoya, and was the cheapest way
to achieve a mirrorless camera possible, which was to take a K-r lop off
the prism, replace the mirror box with a plain box and put redesigned
plastic body panels on the existing stainless steel frame. There were a
number
I thought British pints were redefined to conform to the 1/2 liter or
did they make an exception to that...
On 9/19/2014 12:34 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
Considering the camera angle, are we to believe it was just two pints of beer,
Mark. :)
Well, they were British pints.
P.J. Alling wrote:
>I thought British pints were redefined to conform to the 1/2 liter or
>did they make an exception to that...
A pint in a British pub is a British Imperial Pint: 20 fluid ounces or
568 millilitres.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listin
Then they made an exception. I remember when Britain went Metric there
was worry that the traditional pint would no longer be available. The
regulations seemed to require it's demise.
On 9/19/2014 1:03 PM, Postmaster wrote:
P.J. Alling wrote:
I thought British pints were redefined to confo
Please see the write up here:-
http://betterphotography.in/photokina-2014/pentax-confirms-that-a-full-frame-dslr-is-on-its-way/33947/
A PDMLer mentioned that the FF would be released under the RICOH Brand Name.
This article clearly states that it is going to be a Pentax, and that
some new lenses
P.J. Alling wrote:
>Then they made an exception. I remember when Britain went Metric there
>was worry that the traditional pint would no longer be available. The
>regulations seemed to require it's demise.
I'm pretty sure that was an urban legend (or as best, an unwarranted
fear voiced at the
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 09:08:09AM -0500, Darren Addy wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Alan C wrote:
> > If people really want to use pre-"A"
> > lenses, they can easily work in M mode and use Sunny 16 like we all did long
> > ago (& waste no film).
>
> Pentax has actually given us a lot
You're welcome. I'm sure this was my doing since I finally got tired
of waiting for a Pentax FF last month and bought a K-3. Oh well.
At 1:22 PM -0400 9/19/14, Bipin Gupta wrote:
Please see the write up here:-
http://betterphotography.in/photokina-2014/pentax-confirms-that-a-full-frame-dslr-i
On 19 September 2014 08:30, Bob W-PDML wrote:
> It's a very hilly town.
>
> Mike looks a bit tired - what did you do to him?
I'm contemplating the walk Mark! and Lisa had just finished. The
headwind explains the tilt, too.
>
> B
>
>> On 19 Sep 2014, at 02:44, "knarf" wrote:
>>
>> Tilt? Looks p
The pint was redefined as the volume of 7 straight bananas in a vacuum exactly
144 furlongs north-east of Brussels.
The mile per hour was redefined as the average rate at which Nigel Farage can
snort olives from his nose while standing atop a minaret.
B
> On 19 Sep 2014, at 18:23, Mark Rober
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17861949
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
That should have read “Contemplation."
On Sep 19, 2014, at 2:48 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17861949
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the l
If you read the article you’ll see that Pentax only confirmed that they’re
working on a 24 x 36 camera. Of course they are. They didn’t say they were
going to offer it for sale. Another scribe who attended the same interview
reported on Pentax Forum that release would depend on market conditions
On 19/9/14, Bipin Gupta, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Please see the write up here:-
>
>http://betterphotography.in/photokina-2014/pentax-confirms-that-a-full-
>frame-dslr-is-on-its-way/33947/
>
>A PDMLer mentioned that the FF would be released under the RICOH Brand Name.
>This article clearly sta
On Sep 19, 2014, at 10:14 AM, John wrote:
> Alternatively, since the existing folder already has the name you want to
> use, could you move the contents of the new folder into it & use it that way?
I can do it in Finder, but not in Lightroom, since according to Lightroom, the
folder does not
On 19/9/14, Postmaster, discombobulated, unleashed:
>A pint in a British pub is a British Imperial Pint: 20 fluid ounces or
>568 millilitres.
Depends on the barmaid ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
Errr good point, John.
<>
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:39 PM, John Francis wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 09:08:09AM -0500, Darren Addy wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Alan C wrote:
>> > If people really want to use pre-"A"
>> > lenses, they can easily work in M mode and use Sunny
I don't know how much credence you can put in journalistic endeavors
that get basic facts wrong. I guess we can believe what they wrote, even
though this won't be Pentax's first full frame DSLR, the late lamented
and almost forgotten, or so it seems MR-52, a FF 6mp, often refereed to
as the MZ-
Nicely done Paul
-Original Message-
>From: Paul Stenquist
>Subject: PESO Contemplations
>
>http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17861949
.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the li
Eric - just re-import the folder into Lightroom. gs
George Sinos
www.GeorgesPhotos.net
www.GeorgeSinos.com
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
>
> On Sep 19, 2014, at 10:14 AM, John wrote:
>
>> Alternatively, since the existing folder already has the name you
on 2014-09-19 13:13 Eric Weir wrote
Not even certain I can do it in Finder, since when I attempt to delete the
folder in Finder I’m told “the operation can’t be completed because one or more
of the required items can’t be found.”
if you are getting that message in a simple Finder operation,
Here's an interesting essay about framebuilder J P Weigle.
http://www.core77.com/blog/exhibitions/bike_cult_show_2014_jp_weigle_reflects_on_40_years_of_framebuilding_-_a_photo_essay_27485.asp
Like several other well-known framebuilders he spent some time at Witcomb
Cycles, which was a ramshackl
Paul,
That's wonderful.
The backlight on the hair and popsicle combine with the black
background for a stunner.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> That should have read “Contemplation."
> On Sep 19, 2014, at 2:48 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>> http://photo.
Great portrait!
Be she a pirate lass??
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> That should have read “Contemplation."
> On Sep 19, 2014, at 2:48 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id
Pentax has definitely failed to promote the Green button. To me it's
just a Mystery Button that I could just as easily cover over with
black electrical tape.
After it got talked about here a few years ago, I made the effort to
read up on it. The manual left me scratching my head, but folks here
in
Sweet! The popsicle even matches her color theme. Nice touch, Paul.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 11:57:34 AM
Subject: Re: PESO Contemplation
That should have read “Contemplation."
On Sep 19, 2014, at 2:48 PM, Paul Stenquis
when I use the green button metering/setting, its only to get me in the
ballpark. I then fine tune
the exposure with either and or both the shutter speed and aperture
setting using the histogram/lcd.
works for me.
jco
On 9/19/2014 4:38 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Pentax has definitely failed to pro
sweet!
hmmm Ruby read slippers - is she portraying Dorothy? I"m imagining she
isn't "contemplating" for too long - bet she made quick work of the
popcicle :-)
ann
On 9/19/2014 14:57, Paul Stenquist wrote:
That should have read “Contemplation."
On Sep 19, 2014, at 2:48 PM, Paul Stenquist
on 2014-09-19 14:38 Bruce Walker wrote
I think the issue with the manual is there's
no overview or Big Picture -- why it was added.
perhaps we could crowd source an improved manual here?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCR
There is something about this here:
http://www.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/english/products/k-3/feature/03.html
Scroll down to Hyper Control system. But it's not mentioned in the K-3 manual.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> I realize that this feature goes back to some Pentax film c
Rocks in the river, K3 with Sigma 18-35mm.
http://500px.com/photo/83847651/rocks-by-attila-boros
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
The green button is a mystery because it does so many different things.
In manual mode it recenters everything press the green button while
holding down the exposure compensation button it resets that control to
zero, it does that with a number of setting, press it down while holding
down the
In the K-3 manual, see page 11 and page 73, primarily focused on the choices
and processes involved in customizing the various buttons and E-dials.
Not exactly an explanation of when/why to use the Green Button, but of course
you get that in your initial familiarization from the clerk at the stor
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> That depends. A 24-megapixel FF would have significantly lower pixel
> pitch than a 24MP APS-C sensor – even a 36MP FF has slightly lower
> pixel pitch – so both should theoretically be less lens-critical than
> 24MP APS-C.
If Pentax offered
Like this sort of shot. I think I'd, also, like a full frame, all of which
showing
some interesting detail.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Attila Boros"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 2:24:49 PM
Subject: PESO: Rocks
Rocks in the river, K3 with Sigma 18-35mm.
http://50
Great shot, wonderful mood.
--
Bruce
Sent from my iPad
> On Sep 19, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17861949
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
I wanted to check to see how certain lenses performed on the K-3...
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/photos/ajax_menu_cameralens
and found that the K-3 is not even one of the camera's LISTED. It has
been out for almost a year.
WUTT?
--
Photographers must learn not to be ashamed to have their ph
Nevermind. I just tried it a different way and the K-3 *is* listed.
<>
:)
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> I wanted to check to see how certain lenses performed on the K-3...
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/photos/ajax_menu_cameralens
> and found that the K-3 is not even
I *think* the problem was that I was looking for examples of the FA24
f/2 on the K-3 and there have been no photos with that combination YET
voted into the PPG.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> Nevermind. I just tried it a different way and the K-3 *is* listed.
> <>
> :)
>
I would be buying a Pentax-A* 85mm f1.4 for $1100
and
an FA 24mm f2.0 at $500
and a
Samyang 14mm f2.8
for $359
and a Tokina AT-X 80-200mm f2.8 828 AF Pro for $700
all in anticipation of getting the Pentax FF body next year ()
Total $2659 +
I would also be purchasing
a 645D at $4995
and a
Quoting Darren Addy :
I wanted to check to see how certain lenses performed on the K-3...
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/photos/ajax_menu_cameralens
and found that the K-3 is not even one of the camera's LISTED. It has
been out for almost a year.
WUTT?
No one.
It's pretty obvious that Ric
My feeling as well.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Walters"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 3:42:57 PM
Subject: Re: Who the heck is maintaining pentaxphotogallery.com???
Quoting Darren Addy :
> I wanted to check to see how certain lenses performed on the K-3...
> h
Who is Nigel Farage?
Cheers
Mike
Sent from my iPad
> On Sep 19, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>
> The pint was redefined as the volume of 7 straight bananas in a vacuum
> exactly 144 furlongs north-east of Brussels.
>
> The mile per hour was redefined as the average rate at which Nige
Very nice. You caught it at the right moment. I don’t find the noise
objectionable.
Paul
On Sep 18, 2014, at 9:27 PM, knarf wrote:
> Nice thing about this time of year is the sun rises at a very civilized hour.
>
> I've mixed feelings about this one. Colours, clouds and comp are okay but the
There's something about a handcrafted steel frame.
Thanks for posting this, Bob.
Cheers,
frank
On 19 September, 2014 3:45:32 PM EDT, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>Here's an interesting essay about framebuilder J P Weigle.
>
>http://www.core77.com/blog/exhibitions/bike_cult_show_2014_jp_weigle_reflects_o
Sublime.
Very Zen.
Cheers,
frank
On 15 September, 2014 8:53:24 PM EDT, Ken Waller wrote:
>Another image from my shoot in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan last
>June.
>Taken, around sunrise on a cloudy morning.
>
>K3, 70-210mm f4-5.6 F @ 200mm, .3 sec @ f8.0, 200 ISO.
>
>http://photo.net/
I'm scanning old slides, using Vuescan and saving them as .DNG files. I
just got to the end of a batch of 36 slides & on the *LAST* slide I
discover that I've put them all in the scanner BACKWARDS!!
Is there any program that will let me flip .DNG images horizontally and
KEEP them as .DNG files
I had a bit of a windfall earlier this year so I was able to buy the K-3
without having to plunder my savings against the day ... if it ever came.
By the time it actually shows up at my local pusher I might be able to
afford it. I've got lenses I expect I'll be able to use - FA50/1.4,
FA43/1.9
PhotoShop will let you save them as jpg, tiff, PSD and a number of other
formats. Why would you want to save them as DNG once they’ve been rendered? The
only advantage I’ve seen with DNG is that I can tweak the files in ACR before
fine tuning them in PhotoShop.
Paul
Adobe ACROn Sep 19, 2014, a
On 9/19/2014 5:56 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
That depends. A 24-megapixel FF would have significantly lower pixel
pitch than a 24MP APS-C sensor – even a 36MP FF has slightly lower
pixel pitch – so both should theoretically be less lens-critical
I agree with Paul here... and add .png to the list of good file formats.
Of course if you know you are going to edit them more you wouldn't use
jpg the first save... but you knwo that I'm sure
ann
On 9/19/2014 22:07, Paul Stenquist wrote:
PhotoShop will let you save them as jpg, tiff, PSD an
I don't want to render them. I may want to render them in the future,
but for now, I just want to flip them so that they're the right way
round, so that I don't have to worry whether I'll remember it later.
If there's no way to keep them as .DNG files, I'll just have to scan
them again and get
On Sep 20, 2014, at 10:33 am, Darren Addy wrote:
> I *think* the problem was that I was looking for examples of the FA24
> f/2 on the K-3 and there have been no photos with that combination YET
> voted into the PPG.
Send me a K-3 and I'll put as many up there as you like :)
Cheers,
Dave
--
P
Beautiful photos. Thanks for posting. I guess carbon is out of the question :)
Cheers,
Dave
On Sep 20, 2014, at 7:45 am, Bob W-PDML wrote:
> Here's an interesting essay about framebuilder J P Weigle.
>
> http://www.core77.com/blog/exhibitions/bike_cult_show_2014_jp_weigle_reflects_on_40_yea
Hi Everyone:
Had to run an errand downtown today and thought I’d head over to the Michigan
Ave. Apple store to get some snaps of the long lines. Gorgeous day
today--weather really nice. We hear a bad storm is headed our way late
tomorrow though.
http://www.caguila.com/phoneline/index.html
C
You have managed to tell a great story with this set of images. Very nicely
done!
--
Bruce
Sent from my iPad
> On Sep 19, 2014, at 10:14 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone:
>
> Had to run an errand downtown today and thought I’d head over to the Michigan
> Ave. Apple store to ge
Lightroom does it
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 20/09/2014 11:47 am, John wrote:
I'm scanning old slides, using Vuescan and saving them as .DNG files. I
just got to the end of a batch of 36 slides & on the *LAST* slide I
discover that I've put them all in the scanner BACKWAR
Thanks, Bruce. I’m off to bed now. Early morning call tomorrow. Cheers,
Christine
On Sep 20, 2014, at 12:33 AM, Bruce wrote:
> You have managed to tell a great story with this set of images. Very nicely
> done!
>
> --
> Bruce
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Sep 19, 2014, at 10:14 PM,
72 matches
Mail list logo
