Hi,
but the camera has to choose the exposure time for the shot and
therefore everything is fixed after the exposure. Setting an ISO in
a digital camera is just another word for under- or overexposure. So
I think what you discribe is just not possible - but a nice imagination!
Best regards, Hans.
.
>
> http://www.neovenator.com/gallery/files/d2/infra_01.html
>
> So yeah, it has some sensitivity. (;
>
> John Celio
>
> --
>
> http://www.neovenator.com
>
> AIM: Neopifex
>
> "Hey, I'm an artist. I can do whatever I want and pretend I&
Hi all,
I heard that the *istDS has some sensitivity in the infrared. Has
anybody experiences shooting IR with *istD?
Thanks and best regards, Hans.
--
Hans Imglueck
5 GB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS http://www.gmx.net/de/go/promail
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
n find for any of these
> lenses
> > used, in good condition?
>
>
> Also, can anybody comment on
> A 135/2.8 lens compared to F and/or FA 135/2.8 ?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Igor
>
--
Hans Imglueck
Lust, ein paar Euro nebenbei zu verdienen? Ohne Kosten, ohne Risiko!
Satte Provisionen für GMX Partner: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/partner
ve any leica glass) is that i
> am not aware
> of any pentax lenses (shorter than 200mm) designed to be used wide open.
>
> mishka
>
--
Hans Imglueck
5 GB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS http://www.gmx.net/de/go/promail
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
7;luckily' not to stand).
Best regards, Hans.
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: "pentax list"
> Betreff: Re: August PUG is open
> Datum: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 15:48:25 +0100
>
> On 2/8/05, Hans Imglueck, discombobulated, un
Hi Cotty,
I like your Pussanova very much! How did you manage to use
Pentax K lenses on a Canon EOS?
Best regards, Hans.
--
Hans Imglueck
GMX DSL = Maximale Leistung zum minimalen Preis!
2000 MB nur 2,99, Flatrate ab 4,99 Euro/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
(seriously)
>
> ft> He's what this list is about, and why it's such a great place to spend
> ft> a couple of hours a day.
>
> ft> cheers,
> ft> frank
>
>
>
--
Hans Imglueck
5 GB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS http://www.gmx.net/de/go/promail
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
t? (See subject)? Is this a lense built by
> Cosina or whatever? And *not* an 1:1 macro?
>
> - Toralf
>
--
Hans Imglueck
Weitersagen: GMX DSL-Flatrates mit Tempo-Garantie!
Ab 4,99 Euro/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
Hi,
one more try to convince everybody of the beauty of small many legged
animals:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3327021
Again several shots (~4) overlaid and used LED-light clearly visible in
some of the eyes.
Best regards,
--
Hans Imglueck
+++ Lassen Sie Ihren Gedanken
regards, Hans.
> On 4/29/05, Hans Imglueck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > something for dark eyes and long leg lovers:
> >
> > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3319281
> >
> > Comments are welcome!
>
> Reminds
ast summer.
>
> http://www.oksne.net/paw/lynx.html
>
> All comments appreciated, and thanks for looking.
>
> Jostein
>
--
Hans Imglueck
+++ Lassen Sie Ihren Gedanken freien Lauf... z.B. per FreeSMS +++
GMX bietet bis zu 100 FreeSMS/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail
Spider in a studio. It had to be contained in a glass walled
> enclosure,
> > and repeatedly lunged at the camera.
>
> I always wanted to photograph one of those. I'll remember the
> aggresivness
> if I ever come across one the next time I'm in Oz.
>
> Christian
>
--
Hans Imglueck
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail
Hi all,
something for dark eyes and long leg lovers:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3319281
Comments are welcome!
Best regards, Hans.
--
Hans Imglueck
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail
kground seems to be quite sharp whereas the nose is not.
Anyway great shot, thanks.
Best regards, Hans.
--
Hans Imglueck
+++ Sparen beginnt mit GMX DSL: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
Hi all,
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3308195
Generally I'm not much of a flower lover but this one
I found quite nice. What do you think?
Best regards, Hans.
--
Hans Imglueck
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS
lly like this picture. I think it would be better
> if either the depth of field were a little greater
> (I'm surprised it is =so= shallow at f/8!), or if the
> plane of focus were a little closer to the lens so
> that the bug's eyes were in focus.
>
> Rick
>
.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3278186
> >
> > Best regards, Hans.
>
> Hans, this is excellent. I have a question if you don't mind. Were you
> doing anything with the light - reflectors and such? Or it was just shot
> under daylight?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
Are the asian ones more brown? A couple of people here are thinking
that the ladybugs were formerly much more red. That would be the
explanation. Thanks, Hans.
> >
> > From: "Hans Imglueck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2005/04/13 Wed PM 02:27:32 GMT
> >
27;m surprised it is =so= shallow at f/8!), or if the
> plane of focus were a little closer to the lens so
> that the bug's eyes were in focus.
>
> Rick
>
> --- Hans Imglueck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > was for long not present but I
Hi all,
was for long not present but I'm back. What do you think of this
one:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3278186
Best regards, Hans.
--
Hans Imglueck
+++ GMX - Die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
1 GB Mailbox bereits in GMX FreeMail http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail
Hi Rob and all,
yes, I made the mistake - I've got the 3.5mm one.
Thanks for your help and best regards, Hans.
--- "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 16 Aug 2004 at 2:30, Hans Imglueck wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I tried to do as is described bellow, but th
Hi Rob,
since I am a macro fan, I have indeed a lot of macros. I plan
for long a test of them but don't find the time. The oldest one
I own is the SMC-M 4/100mm macro. Is this old enough?
Best regards, Hans.
--- "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10 Aug 2004 at 9:54, John C. O'Connel
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2595608&size=lg
This is a crab spider (? don't know whether this is the correct
translation of 'Krabbenspinne') preparing the spin off from the
top of a thistle: It sets out a long thread (cannot be seen) and
hopes that it will stick to something else.
his girlfriend (wearing a long flowy dress). Turns out it was
the handler and his eagle! The bird was massive! Never got to see it do
anything interesting though. How did they demonstrate the hunting?
Regards,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: "Hans Imglueck" <[EMAIL PROTE
x.htm
until I get the new shots up in a web gallery.
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: "Hans Imglueck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: Young Lady
> Sorry, I don't understand SCA. 14 rol
Hi Tom,
great shot - perfect composition. They look very curious.
Regarding sharpness the shot could be a little bit sharper. I assume
you used the lens at 300 mm handheld. Is the slight softness due to
the lens or due to vibrations? Are you content with the lens?
Best regards, Hans.
--- "Tom
e' pretty well, Hans. Nice shot. Regarding
historical/pseudo-historical garb, were they SCA by any chance? I've just
had a big shoot over the weekend and have got 14 rolls to collect today.. 14
rolls of people in historical (or pseudo historical) garb.. Can't wait!
Cheers,
Ryan
> ---
Hi Markus,
no, not at all.
Thanks and best regards, Hans.
--- "Markus Maurer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Hans
a very beautiful portrait with wonderful soft colors, I like it a lot.
But, she does not seem to be "im GlÃck" - lucky?
greetings
Markus
> > Hi all,
> >
> > http://www.photo.net/p
Hi Rob,
funny shot, nice detail and good composition. The bird itself seems
to grin. What kind of bird is it? Never saw that before.
Best regards, Hans.
--- "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Been away for a few days, first photo off the block:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_i
Boris, many thanks for the kind comment. Best regards, Hans.
--- "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2558903
>
>This time a lovelier subject compared to my last two PAWs.
>
>Comments are welcome!
Hans, from the point of view of my ability
ur equipment and exposure, etc.
Racehorse.
-Original Message-
From: Hans Imglueck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 6:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAW: Butterfly
Hi Ann,
it is a butterfly - and no moth! Ok it is a bit hairy,
but that is common to almost all bu
comment, Hans.
--- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 26/7/04, Hans Imglueck, discombobulated, offered:
>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2558903
>
>This time a lovelier subject compared to my last two PAWs.
>
>Comments are welcome!
Whoa!
Snap!
<http://www.m
comment, Hans.
--- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 26/7/04, Hans Imglueck, discombobulated, offered:
>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2558903
>
>This time a lovelier subject compared to my last two PAWs.
>
>Comments are welcome!
Whoa!
Snap!
<http://www.m
Hi Rob,
you got me! No, it is a composition of two photos - head
and left wing is one, the rest the other.
Best regards, Hans.
--- "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 26 Jul 2004 at 4:12, Hans Imglueck wrote:
>
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=25
called "Kleiner Fuchs" and
his caterpillars are living on stinging nettles. In
Germany these butterflies are really common (as the stinging
nettles) - but I like its colors (brownish red bordered
with the blue band).
Best regards, Hans.
--- Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
#x27;t use Canon here... ;)
-el gringo
-Original Message-
From: Hans Imglueck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 8:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW: Horse-fly - Beware!
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2539583
Taken with the Canon 3.5/20 mm Macrophoto on t
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2539583
Taken with the Canon 3.5/20 mm Macrophoto on tripod. About
15 shots are stiched together to get that DOF. The image
isn't cropped! Comments are welcome!
Regards, Hans.
_
23a mail
which should get me pretty good magnification
but I don't know about results.
Anyway, nice captures, looking forward to seeing more from you.
David
Hans Imglueck wrote:
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2525200
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2525206
>
&
"?
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/14/04 09:37AM >>>
On 14 Jul 2004 at 0:44, Hans Imglueck wrote:
> The fotos where done using *ist D with Canon Macrophoto
> 2.8 35mm (adapted via Zoerk MFS). The scaling factor
> was about 3. Handheld at 5.6 and 1/60s without flash.
> T
Hi,
from that test I cannot distinguish which one has the better
resolution. To my opinion all of them are losing real resolution
at the middle of the graphs. The bottom part is faked on the
most ones. Real resolution would mean:
Seeing 9 lines.
Regards, Hans.
--- "Dario Bonazza" <[EMAIL PROTE
Hi,
to my eye the *ist-D is the one with the least distortion.
Only a slight color moire far down. Am I wrong? Or is
even that subjective?
Regards, Hans.
--- Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
on 08.06.04 15:15, Rob Studdert at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well of course Bayer interp
Hi Shel,
I own the 2.8/16mm Fisheye(do you mean this one?). I am quite pleased
by the good results (regarding the price of the lens). I used
it on my *ist D and the resolution is good enough. I saw no obvious
chromatic aberration. Only when pointing towards the sun there
was some reflexes visible
Hi,
my favorite pictures are:
- "Salvia Leaves" by Alastair Robertson: Colours and composition
is really great to me. It reflects a lot of calmness.
- "-(" by Dag Thrane: Very well made (background with black and
white)- it is really good
Thanks, Hans.
_
If it is set to "on" then the camera will release, when a lens
is set to manual aperture (aperture ring not in A mode, which is always
the case for M/K lenses) otherwise the camera will not release.
Note: When the aperture ring is not in A mode, the lens will be always
wide open during exposure.
C
Hi,
only one comment to the word "revenge" which obviously caused
somt of the reactions:
As I understand Osama bin Laden is responsible for 11th of September.
So going for him, bringing him for a court and punishing him is
good and will be understood by anybody in the world (except of Osama :-)).
rcible suppression of
>opposition - Saddam is/was the same, etc.) Perhaps you long for those days
>of yesteryear and are saddened to see a kindred spirit fall.
>
>Sig Heil! (or whatever)
>
>Regards,
>Bob...
>----
>"Do not sup
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>Hans Imglueck wrote:
>>
>> Saddam has had not the power to do what Hitler has done. In his
>> case a war was not necessary. Hitler forced the war and I do think
>> that self defence is the right of each human being. Saddam
>>
necessary to do this first - but
by the friendship between American, French, British, German and all
the others.
Best regards, Hans.
--- Dan Matyola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Chamberlain tried that with Hitler. IIRC, it didn't work too well.
>
>Hans Imglueck wrote:
>
>>E
.
--- "Steve Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>So we should have sent Saddam pretty flowers instead of removing
>him from power?
>Steve Larson
>Redondo Beach, California
>
>
>Hans Imglueck wrote:
>> Evil can only be overcome with love and peace. I think there a
>to hide . . .
>
>Hans Imglueck wrote:
>
>>What are they planing? How many people have to die before the victims
>>of September the 11th will be avenged? Indeed tragic!
>>
_
23a mail
__
Hi,
Tony said:
"September the 11th was not an isolated event, but a tragic prologue, Iraq another
act, and many further struggles will be set upon this stage before it's over."
What are they planing? How many people have to die before the victims
of September the 11th will be avenged? Indeed t
Hi Dr.,
it is clear that "being" or "existing" is alway different to
"exlanation" or "imagination" of these. This will be always the
case and no other kind of seeing will change this. I belive only
God sees that way.
You can belive me, I am physicist!
Best regards, Hans.
--- "Dr E D F Williams
--- Dag T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I look at the subject and light and figure out how I want that 3D
> scene
> projected onto a 2D plane.
What version of AutoCAD do you currently use ?
>>> Viewing a vista through one eye tends to give me a pretty good
>>> approximation
Hi Len,
>There are many more advantages to using a computer but most
>folks already know that, including yourself, so I won't bore the list
>further.
Perhaps it's more interesting to give Pentax some more marketing advise ;-)
Cheers, Hans.
___
. I think what
counts is creativity. Our minds are creative (some more - some less). Without
creativity digital or any new technology
won't change much.
Regards, Hans.
--- Dag T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>På fredag, 11. juli 2003, kl. 22:27, Hans Imglueck:
>
>> May
That is exactly the point. And let me add:
Digital allows people to modify their pictures. You can easily
add the date and time (no need for data back any more), you can
even include thoughts or feelings into the image (don't need
to write it in the album), and what is more you can hide disturbing
Hi Michel,
the picture is surely of a FA* 2/24mm. For the rest around
I have to admit that I cannot read it.
Hans.
--- Michel Carrère-Gée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>See this page:
>http://www.cameraunion.net/forum/showthread.php?threadid=139413&pagenumber=1
>
>Michel
__
Hi,
that don't impress me much ...
- autofocus?
- TTL flash?
- MLU?
-> the *ist D will be much better and cheaper.
Regards, Hans.
--- "kanga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>http://www.horsemanusa.com/pd_frame09.html
_
23a mail
___
Hi everybody,
American CIA and British intelligence found clear evidence that the
crippled mount of Pentax *ist D is due to the import/export laws of the
European Union:
".. an import fee of 50 Euro per mechanical connection between
lens and body has to be payed on DSRL since 1st Jan. 2003 on ..
Hi,
the effect of tilt is higher at smaller focus length.
Best regards, Hans.
--- "adphoto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>thanks for the replies
>these are the 3 i have found on ebay and i take it from the respnses that
>the 80mm would be the best to have tilt with am i correct or would the 35mm
Hi,
there are two ARSAT (Russian) tilt/shift lens for Pentax
K available:
35mm and 80mm
Cheers, Hans.
--- "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The various companies were interesting in this arena.
>Canon FD-mount had a tilt/shift lens.
>Minolta MD-mount had a lens that shifted on bot
Hi,
the tilt function is for fitting the focal plane of the camera
to the object plane in the case these two planes are
not parallel. In effect you get extended depth of focus. The feature
is most often used in landscape and macro photography but may be
also usefull in architecture. In landscape y
I agree.
Regards, Hans.
--- Caveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In two years this list will change its name into PRML.
>
>cheers,
>caveman
_
23a mail
_
Select your own custom
If one removes the aperture lever of a K or M lens it would
act like the M42 lenses - that's easily done. But afterwards
it would work in no way on a pre-*ist-D-body. So one has to decide.
Perhaps I will do it with some of my K and M lenses, if the *ist D
is really not fully compatible to K and M l
Hi,
it is easy to make manual aperture lenses out of each K and M lens:
Just cut away the aperture lever and it will work fine with *ist D
- but no more with MZ, PZ and all earlier bodies.
One has to decide: Go digital or stay in your cave!
Cheers, Hans.
--- "Roland Mabo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
--- KT Takeshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If Pentax would stick to APS size CCD while maintaining the K-mount
>diameter, they could produce very sharp, compact and FAST lenses. And when
>this new series of lenses are equipped with USM and/or IS, mmh, it's
>yummy.
That's exactly what I'm
Hi Arnold,
I saw it. It is in the PDF-File. So the *ist is not compatible
with K- and M-lenses. Hopefully the *ist D is!
Best regards, Hans.
--- Arnold Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I can see the page and have seen it before but I can see no such
>information.
>
>Arnold
>
>
>
>Roland Mabo s
Hello John,
well said. I'm also very content with announcement of the
*ist D.
Regards, Hans.
--- "whickersworld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
>>
>
>> I didn't say it was a knock off and it doesn't matter if
>it's similar or
>> not. It doesn't matter if it has the best int
Hello Tony,
the 1.7 F converter covers not the whole range. It can only
focus when you are in some range close to the focus. That depends
clearly on the focal length of the used lens. So the behaviour
you have discribed is normal.
The difference between the automatically found focus and the
cor
_
23a mail
_
Select your own custom email address for FREE! Get [EMAIL PROTECTED] w/No Ads, 6MB,
POP & more! http://www.everyone.net/selectmail?campaign=tag
Hello Arnold,
I have unsucribed this day because I cannot cope with the
flood of emails.
Hans.
--- Arnold Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Welcome Hans!
>
>I am happy that you are here, too!
>
>Arnold
_
23a mail
72 matches
Mail list logo
