Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?act=attachtype=postid=239772
a) Pretty.
b) Needs a LOLcats-style caption. ;-)
-- Glenn
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
I'm not familiar with the term LOLcats-style caption.
Something like; Send Out the Clowns ?
I'm referring to things like these:
http://lolcats.com/
http://realinterrobang.livejournal.com/290916.html
http://icanhascheezburger.com/
Gr. I found another porn site using one of my stories,
_with_my_name_filed_off_ (again), and am feeling rather grouchy
about it.
God knows, I'm pretty reasonable when people ask me for permission,
though I do insist on a link back to my own web site. And my own
copy of the story is Very
On the photos I shot last night in my non-Pentax PS digicam,
what's the difference between an EXIF reported ShutterSpeedValue
of 1 sec. versus 1/1 sec.?
(Gosh, it didn't _sound_ that slow while I was shooting, and
though the people came out fuzzy, the backgrounds are sharper
than I would expect
Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] explained:
There is none AFAICT.
In EXIF spec, the shutter speed is written as a division of two integer.
It is easier to just display the values than to interpret them 1/1
obviously should be written 1.
So it's the camera, not eye-of-gnome, that's the source of
Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked:
Looking to pick up an acoustic guitar (of the six string variety).
Nothing too fancy, but not department store junk, either. Was wondering
if a few of you could recommend something in the sub-$500 range. I'm
specifically not looking for signature
Oy, typos. I shouldn't be awake now.
lots of _boring_ downtime for extras...
-- Glenn
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] suggested:
I have a Takamine mini jumbo that cost maybe $250 at
{slaps forehead} Right, Takamine. I don't find most
of them as _comfortable_ as my Yamahas, but they don't
suck. The Takamine I want is the double-neck (6 and 12)
hanging up in a music store a few
David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 31, 2007 10:39 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a day early, but, looks like the planet has made another orbit
around the sun, and we still have not blown it up, yet.:-)
I sure hope you haven't jinxed the planet Dave. There is
And a Happy New Year to you to Glenn.:-)
Awww, for me? Thanks! ;-)
(And thanks for your part in giving me an excuse to post those
end-of-the-world URLs.)
Happy shooting and good light to everyone here in the months ahead!
-- Glenn
--
PDML
On Dec 31, 2007 11:52 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I doubt very much if it is enforceable.
http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/4326/camera-test-fujifilm-finepix-is-1-a-narrowly-defined-user-licensing-agreement-page2.html
Waitaminute ... since when do we _license_ (essentially
A: What cameras have you owned that you wish you had never gotten rid of?
Super Program
KX
(not so much gotten rid of; stolen from me)
B: And, just for fun, what cameras have you lusted for but never had?
LX
67II
Olympus OM-2n
8x10 view camera
Any Pentax DSLR
Stereo Realist
(I lusted after
I meant to post this last week, but I don't think I got around to it ...
My ex-housemate hasn't removed the last of his stuff, and he said I
could use his computer scanner until he takes them away (my scanners
don't have transparency adaptors, his is a Canoscan LiDE 600F) so I've
been scanning
Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Hmm. While I was writing this, there was a zzzZZZIIIP*THUD*, the
rather distinctive sound of a two-car collision on a rain-slick
street. The police showed up a lot more quickly than any of the
other times I've called 911. Both drivers are
(Yeah, I've been busy offlist and not participating here much, just
glancing at most-recent threads every so often. Sorry about that.
Hope tochange it soon ...)
My ex-housemate hasn't taken his computer away yet, and he has a
scanner with a transparency adaptor (35mm strips only, alas, not
120
Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Might I suggest looking into doing your own scanning and printing
digitally? You'll lose any issues with framing and neg film (Slide
mounts are still an issue unless you don't get the slides mounted).
I've been thinking of that for some time but haven't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But the reason for not using it during a flight is what you said, they are
afraid wireless will mess with their electronics. I wonder about the modern
aircraft thing too, but I'd rather be safe than sorry too.
The last time I looked into this in depth (caveat:
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
they could not print what I saw in the viewfinder.
IIRC, they weren't as bad as wherever K-Mart sent film out
to, where they cut somebody's face in half on a group
photo then tried to tell me it was my mistake even when
I showed them the negative
[dropping in mid-thread 'cause I'm months behind]
Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of all the non-specialized labs, I like Wal-Mart's one-hour service.
It looks like its relatively consistent acceptable quality.
They usually don't mind redoing the prints if you don't like the
colors,
Among the less expensive, non-pro print films, which do you prefer,
Fuji or Kodak? I have found the Fuji 800 to be pretty good, and am
wondering what others might think of this film, and the 100-400
speeds offered by both brands.
In daytime, I like Agfa 100 or 400 but have trouble
Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bandwidth is dirt cheap for commercial sites, and even cheaper for
non-rural consumers. I can get multi-meg Ethernet for less than a
T1 cost 4-5 years ago.
So why load sites down so much that it feels like I'm still on
dialup, eh? ;-) (More importantly:
Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh wait, no. It's Colorado. Well, I knew it was one of those western
states with mountains. But Frank Zappa didn't write a song about going
to Colorado and I'm not going to put anything by John Denver in a
subject line under *any* circumstances.
://dglenn.insanejournal.com, http://dglenn.greatestjournal.com,
and http://www.blurty.com/users/dglenn. At present, most of
the comments are on LJ.)
-- Glenn
PS: If anyone still picking software cares about my opinion,
I really hate Haloscan comment boards.
/
--
PDML
An exchange started yesterday at the Southern Maryland Celtic Festival,
by someone who saw me photographing the band that performed after us
with my K2:
You can't beat that Pentax.
[After checking which camera I was using] Well, I suppose, depending
on your tastes, you might beat it with a
OT because they were shot with my non-Pentax digital ps
(the Pentax photos still haven't been developed yet):
The idjit who totaled my car went to trial yesterday, and I
got a phone call from the Assistant State's Attorney handling
the case afterward. She said the photos I gave her on a CD
last
Not at all germane to the list, but something tells me a few of you
will get a kick out of this nonetheless. Via the Clan MacAthair
mailing list:
| Today is a very special day of celebration.
|
| Today, April 11 is INTERNATIONAL LOUIE LOUIE Day!
|
| While no country has actually made any kind
Taking this out of order ...
graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On second thought I think I will write my congressman and propose
that he introduce a bill to make everyone use sundial time.
A part of me would find perverse pleasure in that -- the purity of
it, having 'noon' actually mean when
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a tough time deciding which way to go on this one:
BW:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5716008
Color:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5708787
Color..without question!
The exercise generated throb of her
Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Several years ago I bought two of those Atomic clocks, one for my
house and one for my studio. They set themselves based on a radio
signal from the National Atomic Clock. One attraction was that they
automatically set themselves for DST when it started
Er ... I was speaking 'ex recto' about the National Atomic Clock
broadcasts, but what I wrote about network synchronization is
correct for the protocols I've looked at closely (not an exhaustive
list, but enough for me to credit someone else's claim that it
applied to all the major ones), and the
Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WARNING! CONSPIRACY THEORY BELOW
So apparently, when Americans have an extra hour of daylight after work
they like to shop. The US chamber of commerce is a huge proponent for
changing DST to an earlier date. [...]
Can you really call it a conspiracy
Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My, my! Most people here find Daylight Savings Time delghtful. Few
people can make good use of the extra hour of daylight before work.
My personal objection has more to do with calling it Saving Time
when it a) doesn't _save_ anything, and b) has as its
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I love DST. Grace and I just came back from a walk. Sunset in Detroit
was at about 7:45 PM tonight. By June we'll be at 9:45. It's wonderful.
If it's a conspiracy, give me more conspiracies.
The more I think about it, the stronger my feeling that the
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
But despite my claim to usually consider Daylight Spending Time only a
minor annoyance, I'm a bit put out by this
Understatement isn't a stranger to you eh Doc?
We may have been introduced at some
Just curious, has anyone accidentally detached their lens from the body?
Not with K mount that I can recall -- I've hit the button while
reaching for DOF preview, but I wasn't rotating the lense at the
time, so no trouble. I've nearly dropped a lens while trying to
preview DOF on a camera
P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geez, bummer man. Though sad to say it makes me feel better about my
car problems. Hope your car is all right.
So far, I'm still not even certain what the insurance situation is --
whether the other owner's insurance will cover it, or declare that
it's
A bunch of smooshed-car photos, none taken with a Pentax (because
all my Pentax cameras use film and I haven't gotten to the lab yet
with the film I shot -- these were all done with my widdle PS
digital), from the hit-and-run accident involving my car and three
other parked cars twenty minutes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to convert 120 tiffs to jpegs, while changing the color
space to srgb. Is there a way to do this as a batch process
rather than one at a time?
The 'convert' program that is part of the ImageMagick suite is a
batch-oriented, command-line tool for this sort of
Tom Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Coyle wrote:
What would you have done?
Yesterday, a young man died in the small park opposite where I live. The
street was full of police and their vehicles, for about 5 hours all told.
Despite the fact that I could see all this action, and
39 matches
Mail list logo
