-
From: Larry Colen
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 6:03 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Looking for an ready to carry long ff lens
Alan C wrote:
Having read this thread with interest, I would say the 60-250 is your
best bet but it is not cheap. You could add a 1.4x too! Pa
sage- From: Larry Colen
> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 4:33 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Looking for an ready to carry long ff lens
>
> Going to full frame, I no longer have a lens for the k1 to fill the niche of
> my 18-250, being reasonably long, if not par
Alan C wrote:
Having read this thread with interest, I would say the 60-250 is your
best bet but it is not cheap. You could add a 1.4x too! Paul had great
success with this combination. I have an FA 100-300 which I used before
I acquired an HD 55-300. Despite the glowing reviews for the 55-300,
Read this (right down to the end).
https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/da--60-250-modification-for-full-frame-56581
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Bill
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 5:50 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Looking for an ready to carry long ff lens
On
Colen
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 4:33 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Looking for an ready to carry long ff lens
Going to full frame, I no longer have a lens for the k1 to fill the niche of
my 18-250, being reasonably long, if not particularly fast, but will still
fit in my camera ba
7;t recall what the back end
looked like.
Alan C
-Original Message- From: Larry Colen
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 4:33 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Looking for an ready to carry long ff lens
Going to full frame, I no longer have a lens for the k1 to fill the
niche of
-Original Message- From: Larry Colen
> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 4:33 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Looking for an ready to carry long ff lens
>
>
> Going to full frame, I no longer have a lens for the k1 to fill the niche of
> my 18-250, being reasonably long
it no
better than the under-rated 100-300 which can be had for a song.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Larry Colen
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 4:33 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Looking for an ready to carry long ff lens
Going to full frame, I no longer have a lens for
inferior lens (with such a
large zoom range) is counter-productive?
OK, I'm not looking for a full frame equivalent of the 18-250, in a
sense I already have one, the sigma 50-500. For what it is, and
especially what I paid for it, it's an awesome lens, but it falls in the
&q
On 12/17/2016 9:33 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Is there anything even better, preferably not too expensive?
No. You can have better or you can have not too expensive, but not both.
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Dis
So you're effectively looking for something like 28mm to something
between 300mm and 400mm.That's not too big... Well unless someone
has repealed the laws of physics that's not going to happen.I don't
think that can be made compact or light weight.
There is the
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 10:08:46AM +, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 17/12/16, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Going to full frame, I no longer have a lens for the k1 to fill the
> >niche of my 18-250, being reasonably long, if not particularly fast, but
> >will still fit in my camer
On 17/12/16, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Going to full frame, I no longer have a lens for the k1 to fill the
>niche of my 18-250, being reasonably long, if not particularly fast, but
>will still fit in my camera bag and not weigh a ton.
>The da 55-300, despite nominally being an aps
Going to full frame, I no longer have a lens for the k1 to fill the niche of my
18-250, being reasonably long, if not particularly fast, but will still fit in
my camera bag and not weigh a ton.
The da 55-300, despite nominally being an aps lens seems to do ok on ff. Is
there anything even bette
That doesn't work either. :)
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:12 PM, John wrote:
> Pick the outcome you want and work your way backwards, swimming upstream as
> it were.
>
> On 10/19/2016 1:33 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> Amusing, but For Entertainment Only as they warn on DVD intros. When I
>> follow
Pick the outcome you want and work your way backwards, swimming upstream
as it were.
On 10/19/2016 1:33 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Amusing, but For Entertainment Only as they warn on DVD intros. When I
follow the chart properly I end up at F/64 Redux which misses by
considerably more than a countr
Amusing, but For Entertainment Only as they warn on DVD intros. When I
follow the chart properly I end up at F/64 Redux which misses by
considerably more than a country mile.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:04 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> Ok, so maybe it isn't off topic.
>
> http://blakeandrews.blogspot.c
Ok, so maybe it isn't off topic.
http://blakeandrews.blogspot.co.uk/2016/10/photo-flo-chart.html
--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
immortality through not dying.
-- Woody Allen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/list
Mark,
I've used the Tetenal C-41 Press Kit to do C-41 at home. It's fast and
reasonably easy, pretty stable too. The C-41 Press Kit chemistry was designed
for journalists on the go so it's not as fussy as some C-41 processing kits
are. B&H has it ...
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=T
hat business though I couldn’t tell from their site…
http://www.customcolor.com/servicecenter/products_services.html
Good luck in your search.
stan
On Apr 11, 2016, at 7:51 PM, Mark C wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am
looking for someplace to get C-41 film proc
doors at the end of March so I am
looking for someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations
for a good lab?
I've heard of oldschoolphotolab.com and thedarkroom.com and based on
their websites either seem to be OK, though I was spoiled by the
$4.50 per roll that the local pla
11/2016 5:51 PM, Mark C wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
for someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a
good
lab?
This won't help in terms of whether a lab is good or not, but the C-41
process is bombproof enough that as l
Color was
>>>> THE place for 120 and other MF and large format film processing. They
>>>> may still be in that business though I couldn’t tell from their site…
>>>> http://www.customcolor.com/servicecenter/products_services.html
>>>>
>>>> Good l
>>> may still be in that business though I couldn’t tell from their site…
>>> http://www.customcolor.com/servicecenter/products_services.html
>>>
>>> Good luck in your search.
>>>
>>> stan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On
site…
http://www.customcolor.com/servicecenter/products_services.html
Good luck in your search.
stan
On Apr 11, 2016, at 7:51 PM, Mark C wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am
looking for someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations
for a good lab?
I&#
only two day service), which was why I finally went
digital.
On 4/11/2016 7:51 PM, Mark C wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
for someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a
good lab?
I've heard of oldschoolphotol
On 4/11/2016 7:53 PM, Bill wrote:
On 4/11/2016 5:51 PM, Mark C wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
for someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good
lab?
This won't help in terms of whether a lab is good or not, but the
://www.customcolor.com/servicecenter/products_services.html
Good luck in your search.
stan
On Apr 11, 2016, at 7:51 PM, Mark C wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking for
someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good lab?
I've hea
-- From: "Stanley Halpin"
>
> Subject: Re: Looking for a Film Lab
>
>
>> These are the only two Michigan shops I have had any dealings with. Both
>> were full service, could handle anything. Doubt if either does processing
>> now, but worth your time to make
Oh, you mean this place http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17963887
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Stanley Halpin"
Subject: Re: Looking for a Film Lab
These are the only two Michigan shops I have had any dea
11, 2016, at 7:51 PM, Mark C wrote:
>
> The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking for
> someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good lab?
>
> I've heard of oldschoolphotolab.com and thedarkroom.com and based on their
> web
eveloping-labs/
HTH,
Igor
Mark C Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:52:33 -0700 wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
for someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a
good lab?
I've heard of oldschoolphotolab.com and thedarkroom.com and based
16 7:53 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Remind me where you are located Mark?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Mark C wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
for
someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good lab?
I've heard of oldschoolp
l did film developing in the area. So I think the future will be mail
order processing.
On 4/11/2016 7:53 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Remind me where you are located Mark?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Mark C wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
for
someplac
roduct/film-developing/
> http://www.richardphotolab.com/
>
> And you look at a few others:
> https://www.slrlounge.com/list-mail-order-film-developing-labs/
>
> HTH,
>
> Igor
>
>
> Mark C Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:52:33 -0700 wrote:
>
> The local pro lab closed its d
eveloping/
http://www.richardphotolab.com/
And you look at a few others:
https://www.slrlounge.com/list-mail-order-film-developing-labs/
HTH,
Igor
Mark C Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:52:33 -0700 wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking for
someplace to get C-41 film
und no pro labs that
>>> still did film developing in the area. So I think the future will be mail
>>> order processing.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/11/2016 7:53 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Remind me where you are located Mark?
>
6 at 6:51 PM, Mark C wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
>>>> for
>>>> someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good lab?
>>>>
>>>> I've heard
;
>>> The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
>>> for
>>> someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good lab?
>>>
>>> I've heard of oldschoolphotolab.com and thedarkroom.com and based on
>>
Good to hear that, Bill.
On 4/11/2016 7:53 PM, Bill wrote:
On 4/11/2016 5:51 PM, Mark C wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
for someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good
lab?
This won't help in terms of whether a l
where you are located Mark?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Mark C wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking for
someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good lab?
I've heard of oldschoolphotolab.com and thedarkroom.com and bas
On 4/11/2016 5:51 PM, Mark C wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
for someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good
lab?
This won't help in terms of whether a lab is good or not, but the C-41
process is bombproof enough th
Remind me where you are located Mark?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Mark C wrote:
> The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking for
> someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good lab?
>
> I've heard of oldschoo
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
for someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good
lab?
I've heard of oldschoolphotolab.com and thedarkroom.com and based on
their websites either seem to be OK, though I was spoiled by the $4.50
Being honest, I have to say up front that I'm not quite sure how SOON
I'm going to be in a position to actually purchase, but if anyone has
a 65mm, 75mm, or 90mm 4x5 lens/shutter that they would consider
parting with, I promise I will give it a good, loving home.
Kind of a spur of the moment, impu
Beautiful but also kind of somber.
On 8/17/2015 4:12 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
A portrait...
Ricoh GXR A12.
https://celasun.wordpress.com/2015/08/17/looking-for-the-miracle/
Comments are appreciated.
Bulent.
-
http
A portrait...
Ricoh GXR A12.
https://celasun.wordpress.com/2015/08/17/looking-for-the-miracle/
Comments are appreciated.
Bulent.
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasun.wordpress.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path
Six months, interest free...
-p
On 4/28/2015 11:13 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
On 4/28/2015 12:19 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
A few months ago I got a spectacular deal on a refurbished HP laptop
with the only provisio that the built-in SD card slot didn't work. No
problem, really. External card readers
On 4/28/2015 12:19 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
A few months ago I got a spectacular deal on a refurbished HP laptop
with the only provisio that the built-in SD card slot didn't work. No
problem, really. External card readers are cheap these days, right? Oh
yes. And it's even better than that:
http://
A few months ago I got a spectacular deal on a refurbished HP laptop
with the only provisio that the built-in SD card slot didn't work. No
problem, really. External card readers are cheap these days, right? Oh
yes. And it's even better than that:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/SpecialFinancingAvai
Hadn't heard about the P600, but I'm not shopping. I too have found the paper
profiles excellent.
Paul via phone
> On Apr 18, 2015, at 3:59 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> In ten years of using the R2400, and some years when I didn't print for
> six-seven months, I've had to clear the nozzles
The R 2400 is excellent. Good for Godders.
Paul via phone
> On Apr 18, 2015, at 4:21 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> thanks everyone for input... given my circumstances, I'm certainly going to
> accept Godder's offer of "Free" R2400 - well, in fact, I already have
> accepted off list so when he
thanks everyone for input... given my circumstances, I'm certainly going
to accept Godder's offer of "Free" R2400 - well, in fact, I already have
accepted off list so when he gets his new one set up
I'll acquire the old one.
As to the profile stuff, the R220 just asks me what specific paper I'm
In ten years of using the R2400, and some years when I didn't print for
six-seven months, I've had to clear the nozzles due to a serious clog twice.
Pigment-ink printers are much less likely to clog than dye-ink printers because
pigment particles are much larger, which requires that the nozzles
I don't think I've experienced a nozzle clog in the last four or five years. If
I'm going to let someone else print, I might as well let them shoot the pics as
well. But that's a personal thing. Profiles are simple. There's one for nearly
every sheet. I use Epson Ultra Premium Luster almost excl
Oops!
On 4/18/2015 2:53 PM, Paul wrote:
Actually, it's just the opposite...the it's when you DON'T print that
the ink dries and plugs up the nozzles
-p
On 4/18/2015 1:33 PM, John wrote:
If you make a LOT of prints the nozzles quite as likely to dry up.
Line should read:
If you make a LOT
Actually, it's just the opposite...the it's when you DON'T print that
the ink dries and plugs up the nozzles
-p
On 4/18/2015 1:33 PM, John wrote:
If you make a LOT of prints the nozzles quite as likely to dry up.
I go to Costco for anything 12x18 ($3.99) or smaller & use a local
pro-lab for
Don't forget having a color profile for each type of paper you're going
to use. And having to create a NEW profile for each of your papers every
time you change an ink cartridge.
If you make a LOT of prints the nozzles quite as likely to dry up.
I go to Costco for anything 12x18 ($3.99) or small
Bad link to the P600 info. Here it is
http://www.redrivercatalog.com/infocenter/articles/epson-surecolor-p600-review-introduction.html
Sent from my iPad
> On Apr 18, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
>
> Yes. The R3000 is probably a better choice for b/w, what with three separate
> s
Yes. The R3000 is probably a better choice for b/w, what with three separate
shades of black ink. Then again if budget is a consideration the R3000 is
about $250 more expensive.
But...the R2000 does do a great job with b/w, but then I'm careful to use
software and the correct icc profile to
We're on opposite ends of the spectrum, Bruce. I love prints. I'm estimating
that this R2400 printer has made on the order of 11,000 prints (in all sizes)
since I bought it in October 2005. It's still working beautifully.
This year in particular, I've been on a "two fine prints per week" progra
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I will probably go for the 3880 (or the next version of the wide printer)
> when my 2880 dies. But I can print 13 x 19s affordably with the 2880 inks. My
> cost per print is about $3. But I would like to print bigger. The 2880, which
> is
Yep. The R2000 is apparently the successor to the high gloss printer. The R3000
is the K3 ink printer and successor to the 2880. For Ann, who prints a lot of
BW, the R3000 would be a better choice.
Paul via phone
> On Apr 18, 2015, at 8:48 AM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
>
> You're thinking of the
You're thinking of the 2000P...a completely different animal from the R2000.
Different ink set, different print engine.
http://t.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/ProductQuickSpec.jsp?oid=8987&utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
-p
Sent from my iPad
> On Apr 18, 2015, at 7:35 AM, Paul Stenquis
That must be a new version of it. The original was a big beige boat and
succeeded the R 1200.
Paul via phone
> On Apr 18, 2015, at 7:50 AM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
>
> No. You're wrong. The R2000 is still in production.
>
> http://t.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/jsp/Product.do?BV_UseBVCookie=yes&sku
No. You're wrong. The R2000 is still in production.
http://t.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/jsp/Product.do?BV_UseBVCookie=yes&sku=C11CB35201
-p
Sent from my iPad
> On Apr 18, 2015, at 6:24 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> Do you mean the R 3000? The 2000 has been out of production for at least ten
>
I will probably go for the 3880 (or the next version of the wide printer) when
my 2880 dies. But I can print 13 x 19s affordably with the 2880 inks. My cost
per print is about $3. But I would like to print bigger. The 2880, which is
very similar to the 3000 and preceded it, is my fourth Epson pr
Do you mean the R 3000? The 2000 has been out of production for at least ten
years.
Paul via phone
> On Apr 18, 2015, at 2:30 AM, Paul wrote:
>
> Ann -
>
> I would agree with Mark C re: to get the exact output you want you can best
> do it by printing your own images. Not only do you have
Ann -
I would agree with Mark C re: to get the exact output you want you can
best do it by printing your own images. Not only do you have more
control over the process, you have a wider range of paper surfaces from
which to choose. Plus...it's most impressive when you can report that
the p
Hi Ann -
I use an Epson 3880 (previously used a 3800 which broke after about 10
years). It is configured to print up to 17 x 22 inches, but can print up
to 17 x 36 with the right paper and settings.
Ink for the larger Epson printers in considerably cheaper than for the
smaller inkjets. I jus
Ann,
You want the Epsons that use their K3 pigment ink set. I've had my R2400 since
October 2005 and it's still going strong. I have been planning to upgrade to
the new P600 model soonish, at which point I'll give you my R2400. It's got
another couple of years of service in it, still makes exc
/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Ann Sanfedele"
Subject: Re: looking for wider format epson inkjet printer
Ken, yes I want another Epson stylus photo.. my current one is the R220
The Epson stylus Photo p2000 sounds right so I could print on 12 x 18
paper.
Thank
e larger format ones.
I'd definitely recommend the Epson line.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: "Darren Addy"
Subject: Re: looking for wider format epson inkjet printer
Ann,
I have no reviews, and I'm virtuall
to deal with.
Its really nice and convenient to be able to make your own prints -
especially the larger format ones.
I'd definitely recommend the Epson line.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Darren Addy"
Subject:
Boy that's the truth! (about cheap printer , expensive ink)
I dont' expect to be making _lots_ of big prints... I love my R220 -
very little problem with the one I have currently, although the previous
one was a lemon...
My prints are better than most of what I got from Bay photo through
sm
Well yes it's like the original marketing plan for razor blades, but if
you search around one can get pretty good deals on ink. I've also found
that if I'm printing 8x10 and up my costs per print is pretty much the
same or better than going to a good lab, with about equal results.
On 4/17/201
Damn, the spell checker really screwed me this time...
On 4/17/2015 11:25 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
On 4/17/2015 10:05 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I don't think I can do this too soon, but I wish I had a way to make
my own 11 x 17 or 12 x 18 prints
reviews? suggestions?
ann
I'm using a Canon, P
The business model of inkjet printers has always been to give you the
razor in order to sell you the high-priced razor blades. The low
printer price is designed to seduce.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:25 PM, P.J. Alling
wrote:
> On 4/17/2015 10:05 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>>
>> I don't think I can
On 4/17/2015 10:05 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I don't think I can do this too soon, but I wish I had a way to make
my own 11 x 17 or 12 x 18 prints
reviews? suggestions?
ann
I'm using a Canon, Pixma iX6520, yea, I know it's not an Epson, but as
long as you use Canon paper, or something close
Ann,
I have no reviews, and I'm virtually never one to stand between
someone and spending their money on a new toy but, frankly, I'm not
sold on the economics of purchasing large format printers. Unless
something has changed recently, inkjet printers are a Royal Pain the
Ass. Of course, it depends
I don't think I can do this too soon, but I wish I had a way to make my
own 11 x 17 or 12 x 18 prints
reviews? suggestions?
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and f
My 603II C1 transceivers showed up and I played with them a bit today. They work marvelously for flash, but for some reason, while they work fine as a cabled shutter remote, they don't work as a wireless shutter remote.
Larry Colen wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
Just ordered four transceivers for
Doesn't it embarrass them when you're nude?
On 11/15/2014 10:14 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
When models see you bring out the strip lights, the clothes flutter
down like autumn leaves.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Larry,
So if "tan lights" are for tanning,
what do the "
When models see you bring out the strip lights, the clothes flutter
down like autumn leaves.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
> Larry,
>
> So if "tan lights" are for tanning,
> what do the "strip lights" do? ;-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Igor
>
>
> Larry Colen Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:48
Larry Colen wrote:
Just ordered four transceivers for about $65. Plus they'll work with the 560
iiis when I can afford to get them. I'll keep the Metz for ttl, though it
often seems to fight hard against proper auto exposure.
Of course, the day after I order the 603II triggers, I notice tha
Larry,
I found that with K-5iis and Metz 58-AF, the "A" mode on the flash often
works better than P-TTL.
That's especially the case with the bounce flash and the if the distance
to the subject exceed certain minimum distance (say, at least 3-5 ft.)
At shorter distances, it looks like that in
Just ordered four transceivers for about $65. Plus they'll work with the 560
iiis when I can afford to get them. I'll keep the Metz for ttl, though it
often seems to fight hard against proper auto exposure.
On November 14, 2014 8:44:52 AM PST, John wrote:
>On 11/13/2014 5:47 PM, Larry Colen wr
On 11/13/2014 5:47 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
John wrote:
On 11/13/2014 3:53 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
At the very least, I'd like to pick up some yongnuo 603 II triggers
maybe even a 560III and TX
Has anyone done the research as to where is the best place in the states
to pick them up? B&H says 2-
Larry,
So if "tan lights" are for tanning,
what do the "strip lights" do? ;-)
Cheers,
Igor
Larry Colen Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:48:06 -0800 wrote:
I've really liked what Bruce has been doing with strip lights, so now I
need to start shopping around for some.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis
John wrote:
On 11/13/2014 3:53 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
At the very least, I'd like to pick up some yongnuo 603 II triggers
maybe even a 560III and TX
Has anyone done the research as to where is the best place in the states
to pick them up? B&H says 2-4 weeks to ship
Most everyplace else seems
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 22:42:29 -0400
From: knarf
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO - Looking for the Brass Ring
Message-ID:<6fc2ed14-35a9-4f40-acdb-43712ba88...@email.android.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Another one from the fun fair last wee
Nice moment, he sure had fun:)
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 5:42 AM, knarf wrote:
> Another one from the fun fair last weekend:
>
> http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.ca/2014/08/looking-for-brass-ring.html?m=1
>
> Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
>
> Cheers,
>
> frank
&g
42:29 -0400
From: knarf
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO - Looking for the Brass Ring
Message-ID:<6fc2ed14-35a9-4f40-acdb-43712ba88...@email.android.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Another one from the fun fair last weekend:
http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.ca/2014/08/
Nice, Frank. You really caught the spirit of the ride.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:42 PM, knarf wrote:
> Another one from the fun fair last weekend:
>
> http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.ca/2014/08/looking-for-brass-ring
Nice one, Frank!
- Marco
On Aug 6, 2014, at 7:42 PM, knarf wrote:
> Another one from the fun fair last weekend:
>
> http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.ca/2014/08/looking-for-brass-ring.html?m=1
>
> Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
>
> Cheers,
>
> frank
&g
Another one from the fun fair last weekend:
http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.ca/2014/08/looking-for-brass-ring.html?m=1
Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
Cheers,
frank
“Analysis kills spontaneity.” -- Henri-Frederic Amiel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
On 5/3/2014 7:50 PM, Bill wrote:
On 03/05/2014 5:20 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
On 5/3/2014 7:04 AM, Bill wrote:
On 03/05/2014 4:46 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:
Truth! LOL! From what I've seen the on sensor PDAF implementation
compliment contrast detection more than anything and are still not on
the same
On 03/05/2014 5:20 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
On 5/3/2014 7:04 AM, Bill wrote:
On 03/05/2014 4:46 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:
Truth! LOL! From what I've seen the on sensor PDAF implementation
compliment contrast detection more than anything and are still not on
the same playing field as a dedicated PDAF
On 5/3/2014 2:04 PM, Bill wrote:
Three months ago I was saying the same thing as you about OVFs, and then
I picked up a Fuji X-T1.
I do regret profoundly that it took me so much time to try Ricoh GXR.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml
On 5/3/2014 1:46 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
I'll personally keep shooting DSLRs with OVFs until they go away
forever personally.
Valid indeed. Now, Zos, sir - will you may be eat a hat if proven that
you did not uphold your resolution here?
:-)
Boris
P.S. Personally, I no longer enjoy K-5 with
101 - 200 of 1173 matches
Mail list logo
