On 30/1/11, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
Probably less of a distraction from photography than fiddling with the
iPhone.
You'd be surprised Boris - in some appa entering data is faster than
doing it with pad and pen /winkwinkwink/
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
Beg pardon?!
On 1/30/2011 5:59 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 30/1/11, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
Probably less of a distraction from photography than fiddling with the
iPhone.
You'd be surprised Boris - in some appa entering data is faster than
doing it with pad and pen
On 30/1/11, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
You'd be surprised Boris - in some appa entering data is faster than
doing it with pad and pen /winkwinkwink/
Apologies///winkwinkwink should read:
You'd be surprised Boris, in some instances entering data on an iPhone
is
help me figure out how to reproduce a good shot if I ever make one
by accident (somewhat joking here)).
So: does anyone know of an app for the iPhone that does this? I've
been looking, but my google-Fu is weak.
thanks,
Sam
Hi Sam,
This is the only one I know of:
http://itunes.apple.com/us/app
that does this? I've been
looking, but my google-Fu is weak.
iPen and iPaper.:-)
Dave
thanks,
Sam
PS, despite self disparaging jokes, I've been taking photos for a while.
I'm more of a pancake DA40 than a nifty-fifty.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
is exactly what I was
looking for. $10 is probably a little steep for me. So paper and
pencil will have to do.
Sam
---
Sam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
help me figure out how to reproduce a good shot if I ever make one
by accident (somewhat joking here)).
So: does anyone know of an app for the iPhone that does this? I've
been looking, but my google-Fu is weak.
iPen and iPaper.:-)
Dave
thanks,
Sam
PS, despite self
You'd be surprised Boris - in some appa entering data is faster than
doing it with pad and pen /winkwinkwink/
Apologies///winkwinkwink should read:
You'd be surprised Boris, in some instances entering data on an iPhone
is faster than doing it with paper and pen...
On 30/1/11, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
do you mean your iLid?
eBahgum!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 08:32:20AM -0500, Sam wrote:
So: does anyone know of an app for the iPhone that does this?
Doesn't the iPhone have a simple voice memo app?
Of course you could always leave yourself a voice mail message.
If you stick with using film, you might put an MX-S in your
is metering correctly (and also
help me figure out how to reproduce a good shot if I ever make one by
accident (somewhat joking here)).
So: does anyone know of an app for the iPhone that does this? I've been
looking, but my google-Fu is weak.
Use the iPhone's camera to take a quick snap
On 30/1/11, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
Doesn't the iPhone have a simple voice memo app?
Yes it does. That's an option. Of course, with DSLRs you can often
record the voice memo directly onto the exposed frame - I could do this
with the 1DmII. With, film the correct procedure would
And then there is a variation on the cinematographers approach: have an
assistant with chalk board write down and display the relevant info, include
that in the frame or in a follow-on image.
stan
On Jan 30, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 30/1/11, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
camera is metering correctly (and also
help me figure out how to reproduce a good shot if I ever make one by
accident (somewhat joking here)).
So: does anyone know of an app for the iPhone that does this? I've been
looking, but my google-Fu is weak.
thanks,
Sam
PS, despite self
correctly (and also
help me figure out how to reproduce a good shot if I ever make one by
accident (somewhat joking here)).
So: does anyone know of an app for the iPhone that does this? I've been
looking, but my google-Fu is weak.
If I wanted to do this with my android, I'd take a picture
out if my camera is metering correctly (and
also help me figure out how to reproduce a good shot if I ever make one
by accident (somewhat joking here)).
So: does anyone know of an app for the iPhone that does this? I've
been looking, but my google-Fu is weak.
thanks,
Sam
Hi Sam
, then noting the
technicals never has.
And, while we're on the subject, looking for an app that does it strikes me
as a classic example of techno overkill.
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
alongside them what I want to know, and later
when the shots are done make notes of what actually happened. This has value
to me, whereas wandering around doing general photography, then noting the
technicals never has.
And, while we're on the subject, looking for an app that does it strikes me
On 30/1/11, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
The iPhone doesn't have a simple text editor that you can just write
that info down in?
Of course.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
taken that? Where's the
light? Was flash used? What lens would have given this DoF and FoV?
How would I have set the exposure controls? Then I inspect the EXIF to
see how close my guesses were.
And, while we're on the subject, looking for an app that does it strikes me
as a classic example
://kerygmainstitute.org
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Walker [mailto:bruce.wal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 07:14 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: Re: Looking for app
have given this DoF and FoV? How would I have set the
exposure controls? Then I inspect the EXIF to see how close my guesses were.
And, while we're on the subject, looking for an app that does it strikes me
as a classic example of techno overkill.
Me too. Much easier to simply use
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
... To be honest, I've never understand why people write this information down
after the event, and especially why they publish this information with their
pictures. I can't see how anyone else can benefit - I've never looked at
and wondered what aperture and shutter speed was used, and I've
no idea what to do with the information when people provide it.
'
I never did either, until I started critically looking at photos, and trying to
figure out how they were done, or how they could be done better.
--
Larry Colen l
16:24:19
To: pentax listPDML@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Looking for app to help me log f-stop, shutter when taking,
film photos?
On 30/1/11, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
You'd be surprised Boris - in some appa entering data
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
... To be honest, I've never understand why people write this information
down
after the event, and especially why they publish this information with
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 10:34 PM, drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
I store info on my BlackBerry because I usually have my phone but can never
find a pen on the fly. Pad and pen: two things. Phone: one thing. The pad and
pen just have a higher entropy.
Yes. My point exactly!
Cotty, you gotta be badly discombobulated. I did not participate in this
thread until I saw your message full of slashes and words written
together without spaces between them...
/shrugs/
Boris
On 1/30/2011 6:24 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 30/1/11, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
On Jan 30, 2011, at 11:34 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Cotty, you gotta be badly discombobulated. I did not participate in this
thread until I saw your message full of slashes and words written together
without spaces between them...
/shrugs/
Boris,
don't mind Cotty, he's just taking the
Mine really is to much of a crap (better than nothing but still).
So I'm looking for an enlarger capable of 35mm, 6x6 minimum. 6x7 and
4x5 as well would be ideal.
Good optics with it and necessary accessories for those neg sizes
would be welcome.
Something like Durst M6xx or something.
I guess
for if I
wanted to get back into the darkroom for 4x5 film.
G
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
Mine really is to much of a crap (better than nothing but still).
So I'm looking for an enlarger capable of 35mm, 6x6 minimum. 6x7 and
4x5 as well would be ideal
. Handled every format. That's what I'd look for if I
wanted to get back into the darkroom for 4x5 film.
G
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
Mine really is to much of a crap (better than nothing but still).
So I'm looking for an enlarger capable of 35mm
It's a keeper, all right.
On 1/16/2011 6:31 AM, David Parsons wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/5357947081/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
Been there, done that! Seems like there are two drawbacks to improved
battery technology:
They last so long you get lazy about recharging them, but when they
quit, they quit *right now*.
Or maybe the improved technology just reveals our own drawbacks.
I like the photograph.
From: David
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 23:31 -0500, David Parsons
parsons.da...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/5357947081/
I like that. Somewhat oddly, the blank space on the top half makes for
an unusual but effective composition.
Cheers
Brian
++
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:31 PM, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/5357947081/
Cool!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Certainly well caught, David. Cherry pickers convention.
Jack
--- On Sat, 1/15/11, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com wrote:
From: David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com
Subject: PESO: Looking Skyward
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, January 15, 2011, 8:31 PM
Very cool, David. Well seen. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 10:31 PM
Subject: PESO: Looking Skyward
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/5357947081
Very nice. The buckets have a nice arrangement to them. I agree with
Brian, the blank top seems to fit.
Dave
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:31 PM, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/5357947081/
--
David Parsons Photography
Did you crop any off the bottom? I'd like to see a bit more of the
bottom bits of the cranes. -T
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 8:31 PM, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/5357947081/
--
David Parsons Photography
http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com
Nope, the framing is straight out of the camera. I got one shot
before my batteries died.
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
Did you crop any off the bottom? I'd like to see a bit more of the
bottom bits of the cranes. -T
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 8:31 PM,
On 16 January 2011 15:31, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/5357947081/
I like it, nice surreal edge ;-)
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio
--
LOL. Jurassic Diesel.
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 January 2011 15:31, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/5357947081/
I like it, nice surreal edge ;-)
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/5357947081/
--
David Parsons Photography
http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com
Aloha Photographer Photoblog
http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Nice, a rather unique formation of cranes !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com
Subject: PESO: Looking Skyward
http://www.flickr.com/photos/alohadave/5357947081/
--
David Parsons
Beeing busy at work, and with other things,
I don't submit much to the PPG much, but once in a while I do that,
and one of the photos (still not exactly as I expect) gets accepted.
After very inspiring, warm and memorable trip to Sydney in September
(again, many thanks to Brian, Anthony and
...because I'm considering selling a kidney to get one:
http://www.flickr.com/groups/k-5/discuss/72157625170255966/
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
Nothing is sure, except Death and Pentaxes.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Me to.
I';m semi retired, drive a school bus, and opted out of collecting my
pension early, so i really need to find a work around here.,
Dave
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:23 AM, CheekyGeek cheekyg...@gmail.com wrote:
...because I'm considering selling a kidney to get one:
I think there's a glut of kidneys that will soon be reaching the market.
On 11/11/2010 11:38 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Me to.
I';m semi retired, drive a school bus, and opted out of collecting my
pension early, so i really need to find a work around here.,
Dave
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:23
If I were you I wouldn't look at this one:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-dslr-discussion/119214-k-5-iso51200-ownage.html#post1231943
Seriously, don't.
--M.
On 11 November 2010 11:23, CheekyGeek cheekyg...@gmail.com wrote:
...because I'm considering selling a kidney to get one:
when I need low light video, and I know what the K-x can do. This is looking
like it has a couple stops of advantage on the K-x. And if they can bin pixels
to get more sensitivity/less noise at the lower resolution of video, it could
be bloody well amazing.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent
I have a AF200T AF289T and Vivitar 2000, (bounce head), the AF200T is
the smallest of the three.
On 11/2/2010 8:48 AM, Nick David Wright wrote:
That's disappointing ... its nearly the same size as the 280t.
Guess I'll just stick with my original idea and get the Vivitar 2000.
Also, I don't
Nick David Wright wrote:
I just hope it's as small as it looks. That gives me an idea. If you
have time, would you shoot a photo of the 200T and 280T side-by-side?
I used to own the 280 and that would give me a better idea how big the
200 really is. I'd appreciate it very much.
That's disappointing ... its nearly the same size as the 280t.
Guess I'll just stick with my original idea and get the Vivitar 2000.
Also, I don't recall the 280T having controllable manual power.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:22 AM, mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Nick David Wright
From: Nick David Wright
You mean it won't work in P-TTL mode right?
The AF200T, in addition to (film camera) TTL, also has a variable
manual mode and two auto modes which will work with any camera you put
it on (assuming the trigger voltage won't fry it).
Right. I should have more accurately
From: Collin Brendemuehl
I would have thought you were seeking the little Vivitar 215.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
Vivitar 285HV!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
LOL! Kinda the opposite of tiny there.
I was browsing through Adorama last night and I found something looks
kinda interesting.
http://www.adorama.com/SUPF20XD.html
Very small flash. Has manual control which lets you dial down the
power, as well as auto flash modes. Also has two slave modes,
Found an AF-200FG for $20 when Wolf Camera was going out of business. It
does pretty much the same thing as the tiny Vivitar except it's dedicated.
The only problem I've had with it is the manual is not available for
download. I like to keep a PDF version of all the manuals for the
equipment
So I went and was looking again at the Pentax dedicated flashes. I'd
never paid much attention.
I think I'm going to get a AF200T.
Anyone have any thoughts on that one? Looks pretty small. Lots of features.
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 9:37 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Found an AF
It's small, light and does a creditable job. Just remember it's an
analog interface, and it doesn't have a lot of power.
On 10/31/2010 11:07 AM, Nick David Wright wrote:
So I went and was looking again at the Pentax dedicated flashes. I'd
never paid much attention.
I think I'm going to get
It sounds exactly like what I'm looking for! ;-)
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:18 AM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
It's small, light and does a creditable job. Just remember it's an analog
interface, and it doesn't have a lot of power.
On 10/31/2010 11:07 AM, Nick David Wright
Have that and the AF280T as well. Won't work properly with the K10D and
later cameras.
I don't know which camera you're shooting with, but check the camera
manual to make sure the AF200T will work with it.
From: Nick David Wright
So I went and was looking again at the Pentax dedicated
cameras.
I don't know which camera you're shooting with, but check the camera manual
to make sure the AF200T will work with it.
From: Nick David Wright
So I went and was looking again at the Pentax dedicated flashes. I'd
never paid much attention. I think I'm going to get a AF200T. Anyone
Okay, here's a strange request.
Was out shooting the other day. I very religiously avoid using flash,
but this particular instance I wanted a flash.
Nothing major, in fact, the smaller the better.
And I remembered years and years ago, I purchased a tiny Vivitar flash
from Wal-Mart for like $20.
Of course, after I send the message ... I find it on my own.
It's a Vivitar 2000 with the bounce head.
Anyone have one stuck in a drawer they'd like to sell?
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Nick David Wright
pedalsandpr...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, here's a strange request.
Was out shooting
I would have thought you were seeking the little Vivitar 215.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Looks like it's been replaced by the 2400. 20 bucks at BH
http://tinyurl.com/2atvtck
-p*
*On 10/30/2010 2:38 PM, Nick David Wright wrote:
Of course, after I send the message ... I find it on my own.
It's a Vivitar 2000 with the bounce head.
Anyone have one stuck in a drawer they'd like to
From: Nick David Wright
Of course, after I send the message ... I find it on my own. It's a
Vivitar 2000 with the bounce head. Anyone have one stuck in a drawer
they'd like to sell?
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Nick David Wright
pedalsandpr...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, here's a strange
The 2000 was nice because even though it was so tiny it had two auto
settings as well as manual.
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Paul Sorenson allarou...@earthlink.net wrote:
Looks like it's been replaced by the 2400. 20 bucks at BH
http://tinyurl.com/2atvtck
-p*
*On 10/30/2010 2:38 PM,
John, that's funny ... horseshoe flash.
Lucky for me I found someone with them new in packaging on eBay for
$10 plus $12 shipping. I think I'll be going that route.
Thanks though!
~Nick
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Nick David Wright
pedalsandpr...@gmail.com wrote:
The 2000 was nice
Back when they were current, I recommended one to a friend, (from
Wal-Mart), for $14.00, I bought one for myself when they went on sale
for under $8.00. Still have it. Not fancy but they work. It would
cost too much to replace it. Just don't put them on an electronic
camera. Trigger
I've seen two different versions of the 2000. The original didn't bound
IIRC, the later version did. This looks like the early version renumbered.
On 10/30/2010 4:10 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
Looks like it's been replaced by the 2400. 20 bucks at BH
http://tinyurl.com/2atvtck
-p*
*On
PJ, you're right. There is a bounce version and an older non-bounce.
Though the bounce feature is kinda funny to me as I don't remember it
having enough power to bounce off the ceiling!
I would almost go for the 2400 except that I want the auto modes on the 2000.
But you're right about it being
eBay item 140466326581
HTH Ecke
also hope noone was watching this already and is updset now...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Not available for purchase in the United States, what is it about
Germans anyway, Dollars not good enough?
I guess I could look at if if I went to ebay Germany, but I really don't
care enough.
On 10/17/2010 9:34 AM, eckinator wrote:
eBay item 140466326581
HTH Ecke
also hope noone was
2010/10/17 P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
Not available for purchase in the United States, what is it about Germans
anyway, Dollars not good enough?
naah, reckon that person was too lazy to check the shipped worldwide
box - most are
eBay is giving me a lot of grief today - sigma is
On 2010-10-17 08:16 , eckinator wrote:
eBay is giving me a lot of grief today - sigma is selling off excess
stock again through an gent who does this often - 105 ex dg macro lens
plus ring flash go for about 1/3 rd of list new with warranty... and I
don't have enough spare goosh to fork some out
2010/10/17 steve harley p...@paper-ape.com:
i just picked up the non-DG version for $100 from a craigslist local, it's
amazingly sharp and a real pleasure to use compared to other things i've
been trying (100/4 bellows and a 2x adapter with 50/1.4)
oh sure, just rub it in... keep going and it
Much to my surprise, my goofy owl made it into the Pentax Photo Gallery.
Dan
http://tinyurl.com/matyola
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Ann, Steve, Brian and Frank.
Dan
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:08 PM, frank theriault
Funny! You picture produced a 2nd morning giggle, Dan. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 2:30 PM
Subject: PESO: HOOO are you looking at?
http
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 2:30 PM
Subject: PESO: HOOO are you looking at?
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11684230
As usual, comments, criticisms, suggestions, puns and abuse are all
welcome.
Dan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
Thanks Ann, Steve, Brian and Frank.
Dan
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:08 PM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11684230
As usual, comments, criticisms,
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11684230
As usual, comments, criticisms, suggestions, puns and abuse are all welcome.
Dan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11684230
As usual, comments, criticisms, suggestions, puns and abuse are all welcome.
Dan
thats a hoot :-)
(pun thread alert!)
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
We've now had too shots with dirty looks fro animals, i.e., this and sour puss
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11684230
As usual, comments, criticisms, suggestions, puns and abuse are all
Sorry, Steve, but I liked this guy, even though he kept staring at me.
Dan
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
We've now had too shots with dirty looks fro animals, i.e., this and sour
puss
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Ann Sanfedele
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:01 -0400, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
wrote:
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11684230
As usual, comments, criticisms, suggestions, puns and abuse are all welcome.
Dan
thats a hoot :-)
(pun thread alert!)
and a
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11684230
As usual, comments, criticisms, suggestions, puns and abuse are all welcome.
Those eyes are amazing!
Nice shot.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.
Thanks everyone for your comments,
I'm going to have to find out more about the Metz 58AF2. The website
mentions a permanent modelling light which could be useful - I know
about the strobe effect modelling light, but the word permanent
suggests something else.
I'll forget about the Sigma
I'm looking to consolidate my flash collection to a single type of
flash that will do all I need.
I currently have 2 AF360 FGZ and 2 AF500FTZ flashes. I tend to use
the AF 360's in PTTL mode and am happy with the results except when
they simply aren't powerful enough to do the job required
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Leon Altoff leon.alt...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking to consolidate my flash collection to a single type of
flash that will do all I need.
I currently have 2 AF360 FGZ and 2 AF500FTZ flashes. I tend to use
the AF 360's in PTTL mode and am happy
...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking to consolidate my flash collection to a single type of
flash that will do all I need.
I currently have 2 AF360 FGZ and 2 AF500FTZ flashes. I tend to use
the AF 360's in PTTL mode and am happy with the results except when
they simply aren't powerful enough to do
Leon, I'd recommend Metz flashes.
Those are excellent and often better than flashed from manufacturers.
You want to check 50 AF-1 and 58AF-2 flash guns. The ysupport Pentax
completely which means wireless the Pentax way etc, PTTL and HSS.
http://www.metz.de/en/photo-electronics/novelties.html
On 9/18/2010 9:14 AM, Leon Altoff wrote:
I'm looking to consolidate my flash collection to a single type of
flash that will do all I need.
Leon, I don't have any modern PTTL flashes using older self-measuring
Metz SCA system unit. I can say that it is reliable, feature rich and
generally
I will attend photo courses, if all goes well.
I'm happy I found that place. It will be hard (3 times 4 hours per
week) but will allow access to the profession (photographer is a
protected profession in Belgium) if I manage to finish it (3 years to
go).
It may be nice, in this context, to own a
(photographer is a protected profession in Belgium) = ?
Hope all goes well in your endeavour.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com
Subject: Photo class/courses and 645 (Looking for)
I will attend
On 6/15/2010 3:52 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
I was trying for a very simple composition here. It's sort of what I
wanted but not sure if it quite works:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP7062.html
I cropped some off the top and left. K200D and 55-300 mm zoom.
Comments welcome.
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:46 +0300, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 6/15/2010 3:52 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
I was trying for a very simple composition here. It's sort of what I
wanted but not sure if it quite works:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP7062.html
I
on Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:46 +0300, Boris Liberman boris71 at gmail.com wrote:
On 6/15/2010 3:52 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
I was trying for a very simple composition here. It's sort of what
I
wanted but not sure if it quite works:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP7062.html
Brian Walters wrote:
I was trying for a very simple composition here. It's sort of what I
wanted but not sure if it quite works:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1370864/PESO/slides/_IGP7062.html
I cropped some off the top and left. K200D and 55-300 mm zoom.
Comments welcome.
Cheers
Brian
701 - 800 of 1962 matches
Mail list logo
