- Original Message -
From: "Luiz Felipe"
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
...but is it a full frame gasket??? :-)
It's a simulated gasket.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/p
I remember reading at the page something about North Dakota... now
that's some extension...
LF
Larry Colen escreveu:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:39:16PM -0700, John Celio wrote:
Here's one of the macro photos:
http://www.neovenator.com/2009/04/pixel-therapy.html
Shot with the K10D, Pentax Hel
...but is it a full frame gasket??? :-)
LF
Larry Colen escreveu:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:36:51PM -0400, Graydon wrote:
With the shipped matte screen of the K20D, I saw the image as sharp when
it (from the camera point of view) was not; it looks like if the plane
of focus was 5cm wide, I'd
resolved.
JC O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Larry Colen
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 5:38 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
On Wed, A
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:39:16PM -0700, John Celio wrote:
> Here's one of the macro photos:
> http://www.neovenator.com/2009/04/pixel-therapy.html
>
> Shot with the K10D, Pentax Helicoid extension tube (fully extended),
> three vivitar extension tubes (can't remember the sizes), Pentax Macro
> B
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:36:51PM -0400, Graydon wrote:
> With the shipped matte screen of the K20D, I saw the image as sharp when
> it (from the camera point of view) was not; it looks like if the plane
> of focus was 5cm wide, I'd see the image as sharp over between 20cm and
> 50cm (depending o
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Miserere wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out if we're still talking about the new camera
> or if it's about AF vs MF and matte vs split-prism.
Hey, this is PDML.
We could be talking about all of those things at once.
Or none of those things.
cheers,
frank
--
I'm trying to figure out if we're still talking about the new camera
or if it's about AF vs MF and matte vs split-prism.
In any case, and seeing as you all asked, I would like a matte screen
with a central micro-prism--no split prism for me, thank you.
Basically, I'd like an SA-23 from the LX era:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Graydon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:20:23AM -0400, Adam Maas scripsit:
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Graydon wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:14:41AM -0300, Luiz Felipe scripsit:
>> >> EVF with a mirror camera? Lose the pentaprism and keep th
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:20:23AM -0400, Adam Maas scripsit:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Graydon wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:14:41AM -0300, Luiz Felipe scripsit:
> >> EVF with a mirror camera? Lose the pentaprism and keep the mirror?
> >> Lose the prism and mirror but keep the
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Graydon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:14:41AM -0300, Luiz Felipe scripsit:
>> EVF with a mirror camera? Lose the pentaprism and keep the mirror?
>> Lose the prism and mirror but keep the camera otherwise the same??
>
> Keep the direct optical path to the vi
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:49:40AM -0400, Mark Roberts scripsit:
> Graydon wrote:
>> You know of any other plausibly-better-than-"A mid-level 4/3 or APS-C
>> DSLR of the brand of your choice" -- which is recommendation #3 --
>> that's going to be announced in a month? I'm certainly not as
>> well-
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:38:39AM -0500, Charles Robinson scripsit:
> On Apr 23, 2009, at 9:00, Graydon wrote:
>> I'm not expecting a revolution either, but, Hoya needs one, and Mike
>> Johnson deferred his camera #2 recommendation today; "This is awkward,
>> but I'm going to have to hold off with
Graydon wrote:
You know of any other plausibly-better-than-"A mid-level 4/3 or APS-C
DSLR of the brand of your choice" -- which is recommendation #3 --
that's going to be announced in a month? I'm certainly not as
well-plugged into the rumour mill as I could be.
Not announced in a month, but
On Apr 23, 2009, at 9:00, Graydon wrote:
I'm not expecting a revolution either, but, Hoya needs one, and Mike
Johnson deferred his camera #2 recommendation today; "This is awkward,
but I'm going to have to hold off with #2 until about this time next
month. Still collecting data. What can I say—t
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:14:41AM -0300, Luiz Felipe scripsit:
> EVF with a mirror camera? Lose the pentaprism and keep the mirror?
> Lose the prism and mirror but keep the camera otherwise the same??
Keep the direct optical path to the viewfinder; lose the moving mirror
and shutter.
Ideally, t
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2009, at 10:48, Graydon wrote:
>>
>> I would shed no tears for the lack of a pop-up flash myself.
>>
>
> As someone who frequently uses the wireless function to fire two external
> flashes using the pop-up flash, I would miss h
re - sorry.
LF
Adam Maas escreveu:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:15 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Graydon" Subject: Re: 21th may is the
day for the new Pentax DSLR.
Which is why I, who think the K20D is a comfy compact size with splendid
ergonomics,
On Apr 22, 2009, at 16:46 , Bruce Dayton wrote:
FWIW, I am quite astigmatic - I wear corrective contacts and I have
no trouble at all focusing on stock *istD, K10D and K20D screens - do
it all the time. Maybe with glasses any movement of the lens pushing
against the finder could cause a problem
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:15:47PM -0600, William Robb scripsit:
> - Original Message - From: "Graydon" Subject: Re: 21th may is
> the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
>> Which is why I, who think the K20D is a comfy compact size with
>> splendid ergonomics, am no
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:15 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Graydon" Subject: Re: 21th may is the
> day for the new Pentax DSLR.
>
>
>
>> Which is why I, who think the K20D is a comfy compact size with splendid
>> ergonomi
I second that. I use the pop up flash in "controller only" mode for
off camera flash. I'd hate to have to buy a accessory to do the same
thing. gs
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2009, at 10:48, Graydon wrote:
>>
>> I would shed no tears for the lack of a
- Original Message -
From: "Graydon"
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
Which is why I, who think the K20D is a comfy compact size with splendid
ergonomics, am not wailing about the prospect of a significantly smaller
camera.
I'm just
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:33:46PM -0500, Stan Halpin scripsit:
> I selected the start of this thread and I then did a sort by Subject.
> Read the thread. The next message in my mail stash coincidentally was
> from early December - Subash quoting a Pentax executive as follows:
> "Next year, we are
I selected the start of this thread and I then did a sort by Subject.
Read the thread. The next message in my mail stash coincidentally was
from early December - Subash quoting a Pentax executive as follows:
"Next year, we are planning to launch some three types, including
minor design cha
Ok, good point. How about I'm lucky to be able to see anything... much
less you.
--
Christian
http://404mohawknotfound.blogspot.com/
Stan Halpin wrote:
Christian - remember, this is Cotty you are responding to. Do you really
mean to say "I'm lucky to actually see you"?
Being around Cotty mad
Christian - remember, this is Cotty you are responding to. Do you
really mean to say "I'm lucky to actually see you"?
Being around Cotty made me appreciate the advantages of being able to
remove my (heavily corrected) contact lenses and going blind...
(astigmatism, presbyopia, and myopia).
FWIW, I am quite astigmatic - I wear corrective contacts and I have
no trouble at all focusing on stock *istD, K10D and K20D screens - do
it all the time. Maybe with glasses any movement of the lens pushing
against the finder could cause a problem?
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, April 22, 2
Cotty wrote:
On 22/4/09, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have hyperopia, myopia and astigmatism
And all that time I thought you were just winking at me.
Dude, I'm lucky to actually see you...
--
Christian
http://404mohawknotfound.blogspot.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
P
On 22/4/09, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I have hyperopia, myopia and astigmatism
And all that time I thought you were just winking at me.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
Graydon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:33:04PM -0700, Joseph McAllister scripsit:
On Apr 22, 2009, at 13:21 , Toralf Lund wrote:
I'm also find it hard do choose the appropriate step on on the
viewfinder focus setting (on the one body I have where there is
actually such a setting.)
I think
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:33:04PM -0700, Joseph McAllister scripsit:
> On Apr 22, 2009, at 13:21 , Toralf Lund wrote:
>> I'm also find it hard do choose the appropriate step on on the
>> viewfinder focus setting (on the one body I have where there is
>> actually such a setting.)
>
> I think th
On Apr 22, 2009, at 13:21 , Toralf Lund wrote:
Christian wrote:
Graydon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:15:24PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
Which is certainly a good thing, but _how_? What about the matte
screen indicates that you're in focus, or the location of the
plane
And I agree with that first part. If the photo is some very close
portrait, the movement from placing the focus aid (or the AF target)
from the eye to elsewhere (assuming the eye as point of focus) when I
re-compose the shot may get me either focus trouble or a waste of time
and a perfect smile
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Peter Loveday wrote:
>
>>> I would shed no tears for the lack of a pop-up flash myself.
>>>
>>
>> As someone who frequently uses the wireless function to fire two external
>> flashes using the pop-up flash, I would miss having the pop- up flash on the
>> camera.
>
I would shed no tears for the lack of a pop-up flash myself.
As someone who frequently uses the wireless function to fire two external
flashes using the pop-up flash, I would miss having the pop- up flash on
the camera.
Me too. I find it far too useful as a flash controller to buy a ca
Thibouille wrote:
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/uploads/post-1970-1240400101_thumb.jpg
Really doubt this is fake. This also confirms current rumours.
We all know the diameter of K-bayonet, so I decided to calculate the
body size. It's approximately 120-125mm wide - in other words it's the
Christian wrote:
Graydon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:15:24PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
Which is certainly a good thing, but _how_? What about the matte
screen indicates that you're in focus, or the location of the plane
of focus, or similar?
Ummm, because the image in t
Beattie Intenscreens are still around as http://www.display-optics.com/products_35mm-format_pentax.htm
but I think they only have old new stock on hand. LX and PZ-1.
If we all scream at them they may put out a model for the K10/20/xx
model cameras. Eh?
On Apr 22, 2009, at 12:23 , Graydon w
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Graydon wrote:
> What about the matte screen
> > indicates that you're in focus, or the location of the
> plane of focus,
> > or similar?
>
> On a good matte screen (among the screens I had for my LX was a
> grid-enscribed matte screen) objects seem to "snap
On 22/4/09, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I'm a look-around-the-frame kinda guy
Mark.
Good pickings in this thread.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss M
On 22/4/09, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Your eye and
>brain indicate that it's in focus sending a signal to your right index
>finger to trip the shutter.
Mark!
Nice T-shirt.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Graydon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:15:24PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
Which is certainly a good thing, but _how_? What about the matte
screen indicates that you're in focus, or the location of the plane
of focus, or similar?
Ummm, because the image in the viewfinder look
>> Which is certainly a good thing, but _how_? What about the matte screen
>> indicates that you're in focus, or the location of the plane of focus,
>> or similar?
>
> Ummm, because the image in the viewfinder looks sharp? Your eye and
> brain indicate that it's in focus sending a signal to your r
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:16:38PM -0400, frank theriault scripsit:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Graydon wrote:
> What about the matte screen
> > indicates that you're in focus, or the location of the plane of focus,
> > or similar?
>
> On a good matte screen (among the screens I had for
Graydon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:29:18PM -0400, frank theriault scripsit:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
And a microprism is the ultimate.
My old Praktica (long since stolen) had a lovely "hybrid" screen:
A split screen centre surrounded by a mic
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:15:24PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
> Graydon wrote:
>> Which is certainly a good thing, but _how_? What about the matte
>> screen indicates that you're in focus, or the location of the plane
>> of focus, or similar?
>
> Ummm, because the image in the viewfinder looks sha
wer wrote:
> From: Doug Brewer
> Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 12:21 PM
> Luiz Felipe wrote:
> > Doug, using fast lenes the split is the better option,
> for me. I really
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:58:00AM -0600, William Robb scripsit:
> I have a very good matte screen for my Nikon F2 that makes the screens
> going into modern cameras look like a wet shower curtain. My major
> problem with focusing now is that the viewfinders are so bloody small.
> Dim as a burnt
Luiz Felipe wrote:
Doug, using fast lenes the split is the better option, for me. I really
hate when I can't change it for the matte for the long and dark lenses.
But 90% of my pics are taken with lenses 5.6 or brighter.
LF
sure. Doesn't stop them from being fiddly.
I'm a look-around-the-fr
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Graydon wrote:
What about the matte screen
> indicates that you're in focus, or the location of the plane of focus,
> or similar?
On a good matte screen (among the screens I had for my LX was a
grid-enscribed matte screen) objects seem to "snap" into focus. It'
Graydon wrote:
Which is certainly a good thing, but _how_? What about the matte screen
indicates that you're in focus, or the location of the plane of focus,
or similar?
Ummm, because the image in the viewfinder looks sharp? Your eye and
brain indicate that it's in focus sending a signal t
My big issue is that I don't want to have to focus first and then
compose. Having the focus aid stuck in the middle of the screen
requires me to have to point it at the subject (almost never dead
center), focus, now shift and compose. With a nice matte, all I have
to do is compose and focus at th
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:31:01PM -0400, Adam Maas scripsit:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Graydon wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:05:06PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
> >> Graydon wrote:
> >>> proper split-prism viewfinder
> >> For me, the above phrase is an oxymoron. Give me a nice m
Doug, using fast lenes the split is the better option, for me. I really
hate when I can't change it for the matte for the long and dark lenses.
But 90% of my pics are taken with lenses 5.6 or brighter.
LF
Doug Brewer escreveu:
Graydon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:05:06PM -0400, Christia
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 02:32:07PM -0400, frank theriault scripsit:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Graydon wrote:
> > Is that different from what the Katz-eye screens do? (From the
> > description it sounds like the same thing...)
>
> I don't know. Never looked through one.
Fair enough.
I
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:28:22PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
> Graydon wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:05:06PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
>>> Graydon wrote:
proper split-prism viewfinder
>>> For me, the above phrase is an oxymoron. Give me a nice matte
>>> screen.
>>
>> Mind if I ask w
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Graydon wrote:
> Is that different from what the Katz-eye screens do? (From the
> description it sounds like the same thing...)
I don't know. Never looked through one.
I was merely commenting on generic split screen versus micro-prism
versus matte screens.
ch
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:29:18PM -0400, frank theriault scripsit:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
> > And a microprism is the ultimate.
>
> My old Praktica (long since stolen) had a lovely "hybrid" screen:
>
> A split screen centre surrounded by a micro-prism ring.
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "Christian"
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
William Robb wrote:
I don't know how the guys using the cheap Canons with their trash
viewfinders manage.
Superior autofocus? :-)
Say that on forum-neuroti
Graydon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:05:06PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
proper split-prism viewfinder
For me, the above phrase is an oxymoron. Give me a nice matte screen.
Mind if I ask why?
Never did like the splitters. Too fiddly and given to blacking out.
Give
You, also, expressed my thought very well, Mark.
Jack
--- On Wed, 4/22/09, Mark Roberts wrote:
> From: Mark Roberts
> Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 10:42 AM
> Bruce Walk
> >> Look kids, a real pentaprism
> >
> > And we kids may detect this how?
> >
> > Trapezoidal silhouette? Front of the viewfinder housing
> slopes like a
> > 1915 battleship turret? Base of the viewfinder housing
> almost as wide as
> > the inner diameter of the lens mount? Protruding, rath
Bruce Walker wrote:
One of the more important features in the K20D that pushed me to upgrade
from the K100Ds was being able to use the PUF as a flash controller. Up
until then I never used the PUF and was considering gluing or taping it
down so it wouldn't pop up when I occasionally hit the
Rather sexy, isn't it?
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=51169
Dario
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: 21th may i
Bruce Dayton wrote:
I have a friend who uses the lower end Canons. She has told me more
than once that she really has to rely on the AF - manual focus isn't
a real option - especially in dimmer light.
Part of the problem with AF these days and lower-end bodies is the
lower-end lenses used on
On Apr 22, 2009, at 12:29, frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
And a microprism is the ultimate.
My old Praktica (long since stolen) had a lovely "hybrid" screen:
A split screen centre surrounded by a micro-prism ring.
The best of both worlds, in my
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:58 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Graydon"
> Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
>
>
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:05:06PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
>>>
>>> Grayd
William Robb wrote:
I don't know how the guys using the cheap Canons with their trash
viewfinders manage.
Superior autofocus? :-)
--
Christian
http://404mohawknotfound.blogspot.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCR
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
> And a microprism is the ultimate.
My old Praktica (long since stolen) had a lovely "hybrid" screen:
A split screen centre surrounded by a micro-prism ring.
The best of both worlds, in my book.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeoi
Graydon wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:05:06PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
proper split-prism viewfinder
For me, the above phrase is an oxymoron. Give me a nice matte screen.
Mind if I ask why?
I could not begin to use manual focus successfully with the shipped
matte scree
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
> But a good matte screen intended for manual focus is arguably the penultimate
> focusing screen.
And a microprism is the ultimate.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE fr
I have a friend who uses the lower end Canons. She has told me more
than once that she really has to rely on the AF - manual focus isn't
a real option - especially in dimmer light.
--
Bruce
Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 9:58:00 AM, you wrote:
WR> - Original Message -
WR> I have a very
Hear, hear! Back in the pre-AF days, I always had to get a camera
with interchangeable screens so I could get a plain matte screen in
it. I find the split prism to get in the way.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 9:05:06 AM, you wrote:
C> Graydon wrote:
>> proper split-prism
On Apr 22, 2009, at 11:58, William Robb wrote:
I don't know how the guys using the cheap Canons with their trash
viewfinders manage.
Point, press button, click, done.
If you're not using manual focus, you don't really need much in the
way of viewfinders!
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson -
- Original Message -
From: "Graydon"
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:05:06PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
proper split-prism viewfinder
For me, the above phrase is an oxymoron. Give me a nice matte scre
While I do agree they get in the way sometimes, I find a proper
(diagonal, not too large) split very useful. Assuming interchangeable
screens, my default would be a split, the secondary matte. Assuming no
interchangeable, would select the split over the matte - small margin
and sad about it. :-
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Apr 22, 2009, at 10:48, Graydon wrote:
I would shed no tears for the lack of a pop-up flash myself.
As someone who frequently uses the wireless function to fire two
external flashes using the pop-up flash, I would miss having the pop-up
flash on the camera.
-Ch
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Graydon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:05:06PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
>> Graydon wrote:
>>> proper split-prism viewfinder
>> For me, the above phrase is an oxymoron. Give me a nice matte screen.
>
> Mind if I ask why?
>
> I could not begin to use manual
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:05:06PM -0400, Christian scripsit:
> Graydon wrote:
>> proper split-prism viewfinder
> For me, the above phrase is an oxymoron. Give me a nice matte screen.
Mind if I ask why?
I could not begin to use manual focus successfully with the shipped
matte screen of the K20D
Graydon wrote:
proper split-prism viewfinder
For me, the above phrase is an oxymoron. Give me a nice matte screen.
--
Christian
http://404mohawknotfound.blogspot.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
- Original Message -
From: "Graydon"
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
The prospect of a nother couple hundred bucks to the Catzeye folks makes
me sad, though.
Damn. I should have bought the cheaper graphics card. I'd forgotten about
tha
On Apr 22, 2009, at 10:48, Graydon wrote:
I would shed no tears for the lack of a pop-up flash myself.
As someone who frequently uses the wireless function to fire two
external flashes using the pop-up flash, I would miss having the pop-
up flash on the camera.
-Charles
--
Charles Robin
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 09:21:52AM -0600, William Robb scripsit:
> - Original Message - From: "Graydon"
>>> Look kids, a real pentaprism
>>
>> And we kids may detect this how?
>>
>> Trapezoidal silhouette? Front of the viewfinder housing slopes like a
>> 1915 battleship turret? Base of
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty"
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
On 22/4/09, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
It looks like the front of an LX prism. I'm hoping (presuming this is for
real) that it is a higher specified body tha
On 22/4/09, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>It looks like the front of an LX prism. I'm hoping (presuming this is for
>real) that it is a higher specified body than the K20D with no pop up flash
>(which I happen to detest).
Do I need to season my hat?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
- Original Message -
From: "Graydon"
Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
Look kids, a real pentaprism
And we kids may detect this how?
Trapezoidal silhouette? Front of the viewfinder housing slopes like a
1915 battleship turret? Base of the
http://sturly.com/y7d if you prefer :)
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> "penta"- is part of the link(?)
>
> J
>
>
> --- On Wed, 4/22/09, Graydon wrote:
>
>> From: Graydon
>> Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new
"penta"- is part of the link(?)
J
--- On Wed, 4/22/09, Graydon wrote:
> From: Graydon
> Subject: Re: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 7:23 AM
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:13:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:13:45AM -0600, William Robb scripsit:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Thibouille" Subject: 21th may is the
> day for the new Pentax DSLR.
>> http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/uploads/post-1970-1240400101_thumb.jpg
>>
>> Really d
- Original Message -
From: "Thibouille"
Subject: 21th may is the day for the new Pentax DSLR.
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/uploads/post-1970-1240400101_thumb.jpg
Really doubt this is fake. This also confirms current rumours.
Look kids, a real pentaprism
Wi
http://www.penta-club.ru/forum/uploads/post-1970-1240400101_thumb.jpg
Really doubt this is fake. This also confirms current rumours.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying o
92 matches
Mail list logo
