APC wide angle: I love my Sigma EX 10-20mm f4-5.6.
Probably have taken more memorable images on that, than any other lens.
It is full frame down to about 15mm (with little vignetting) so I
think it matches the widest rectaliner full frame film lens that
Pentax ever made.
Darren Addy
Kearney, NE
OK, wide angles. I remember back almost 20 years ago when I first bought a
FA*24/2.0 and took it out for a test drive. First look through the viewfinder
and I was blown away. At some point I bought an A-20/2.8 and wow.
Once I got into the wonderful world of 1.5x digital, my early lenses were
Part of the lack of real wide angle with APS-C is a matter of the lenses
you had. Judging from spreadsheet the widest was the DA 20-40.
Now I'd prefer all Pentax lenses, but there are ultra wide angle lenses
for APS-C from other manufactures. The Samyang 10mm f2.8 is ultrawide
by any
Looking for something totally else, I came across this spreadsheet on my hard
drive: a spreadsheet comparing the field of view of various lenses on each of
these 3 Pentax systems: K-1, APS-C, and 645Z. No new information, nothing that
most of us don’t already know about how various lenses
Darren, I think you are assuming that the 645D is an older, lower cost, less
featured, lower resolution medium format camera which cannot compare to the
645Z or the K-1. Well, maybe. But as you note, the CMOS vs CCD gives the 645D a
big advantage for some. Does the added resolution, added live
nty...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think that 645D is effected at all by the K-1. No one invested in
> 645 lenses will be dropping the system because of a FF K mount, they'll be
> getting a 645z, and if they do decide that they want 35mm performance and
> think that they can only afford one sy
I don't think that 645D is effected at all by the K-1. No one invested
in 645 lenses will be dropping the system because of a FF K mount,
they'll be getting a 645z, and if they do decide that they want 35mm
performance and think that they can only afford one system the Canon EOS
5Ds is a lot
I expected the camera to be most affected by the K-1 announcement
would be the 645d. (I'm interested to see IQ comparisons between the
two once the K-1 is shipping). On the surface the K-1 would seem to
have a LOT more going for it, features-wise, while the 645d maintains
that larger sensor and 4
First, a minor quibble: 645D is 1st generation, 645Z is 2nd generation; you
have it the other way around.
But I think the main thrust of your discussion is mostly on target.
I looked at the specs for the new Nikon $6500 camera, did a quick comparison
with the 645Z. About the same size, about
I agree with your analysis (and of course, your correction). However,
I will be very surprised if the Full Frame comes in at under $2500 (at
least initially). We will soon see!
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Stanley Halpin
<s...@stans-photography.info> wrote:
> First, a minor quib
>>> and I love fisheye shots.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Rick
>>>
>>> On Jan 13, 2016, at 8:23 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
>>>
>>>> I find the price trend on the 645D to be interesting (if my empty
>>>> pocketbook
On 1/13/2016 8:23 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
I find the price trend on the 645D to be interesting (if my empty
pocketbook says I'm not quite tempted yet). It seems that there are
more 645D on the market recently, and I it occurs to me that some are
probably upgrading to the 645z and some
much distortion in the second,
> and I love fisheye shots.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rick
>
> On Jan 13, 2016, at 8:23 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
>
>> I find the price trend on the 645D to be interesting (if my empty
>> pocketbook says I'm not quite tempted yet). It seems that t
I find the price trend on the 645D to be interesting (if my empty
pocketbook says I'm not quite tempted yet). It seems that there are
more 645D on the market recently, and I it occurs to me that some are
probably upgrading to the 645z and some are possibly selling in
anticipation of getting
And here I expected something having to do with NYC (the Gotham of Batman).
Both nice; but I prefer the first. A bit too much distortion in the second, and
I love fisheye shots.
Cheers,
Rick
On Jan 13, 2016, at 8:23 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> I find the price trend on the 6
I really think that the downward price pressure on the 645D is more
attributable to the 645z and Canon's mega monster pixel 5D variants than
the promise of a Pentax K-FF. Medium format is a market segment of it's
own.
Fact is, that the Canon 5Ds is really a medium format substitute
th NYC (the Gotham of Batman).
Both nice; but I prefer the first. A bit too much distortion in the second, and
I love fisheye shots.
Cheers,
Rick
On Jan 13, 2016, at 8:23 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
I find the price trend on the 645D to be interesting (if my empty
pocketbook says I'm not quite tempt
50mm SHIFT lens modified to fit Pentax 645 for sale (not mine):
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/24-photographic-equipment-sale/306637-sale-rare-mamiya-sekor-shift-c-1-4-50mm-custom-adapted-pentax-645-mount.html
--
Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Is it really true, that Capture One 8 pro can't handle Pentax 645D
DNG-files?
I can't seem to import them anymore, but I belive I could do so, when I
ran the Capture One 7-version.
I switched to Lightroom when I got the K-3, 'cause Capture One 6 pro
wouldn't handele the DNG files. My problem
Try running them through Adobe's DNG convertor and using the resultant
files.
-p
On 2/17/2015 11:53 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Is it really true, that Capture One 8 pro can't handle Pentax 645D
DNG-files?
I can't seem to import them anymore, but I belive I could do so, when I
ran the Capture One 7
as far as the Optics Pro 8.5 is concerned, at least you have
hope that Capture One will correct the problem.
On 2/17/2015 12:53 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Is it really true, that Capture One 8 pro can't handle Pentax 645D
DNG-files?
I can't seem to import them anymore, but I belive I could do so, when
On 1 February 2015 at 12:25, Jens Bladt p...@planfoto.dk wrote:
Thank you Jostein.
I made a small test.
The time from pressing the shutter until an image shows is appr. 13 sec's.
Turn off lens corrections in the menu.
--
Eric
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
on chimping in your workflow, I understand your frustration with
the 645D.
My cards are not as fast as yours, and get a time lag of about four and a half
seconds. But saving to the card is just the second half of that time. The first
half is data readout from the CCD to the camera's RAM
-Opprinnelig melding-
From: Jens Bladt
Sent: Sunday, February 1, 2015 1:25 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: 645D takes it's time
Thank you Jostein.
I made a small test.
The time from pressing the shutter until an image shows is appr. 13 sec's.
I was using a 280MB/s card for the RAW
When I first installed Capture One 8 Pro (8.0.1.1.16) I was happy:
Now both my favorite cameras were supportet (files only): Pentax K-3 and
Pentax 645D.
Since the I have updated the 8 version to (8.1.0.200).
Now CO pro 8 won't read my 645D files.
Is there a way to convert the 645D DNG files
I didn't know of such a thing :-)
Thanks Eric
Den 01-02-2015 kl. 13:44 skrev Eric Featherstone:
On 1 February 2015 at 12:25, Jens Bladt p...@planfoto.dk wrote:
Thank you Jostein.
I made a small test.
The time from pressing the shutter until an image shows is appr. 13 sec's.
Turn off lens
supportet (files only): Pentax K-3 and
Pentax 645D.
Since the I have updated the 8 version to (8.1.0.200).
Now CO pro 8 won't read my 645D files.
Is there a way to convert the 645D DNG files so that CO Por 8 can read
them, please?
I like CO Pro 8 very much, and I'd hate going back to Ligtroom again
Sometime ago I shot a lot of football players in a studie environment.
I used my K-3 and the 645D.
I quickly gave up on the 645D, because it too SO long for it to show an
image just taken. Is this normal. Is ther a way arroud this - smaller
JPEG's or faster SD cards?
I use 280 mb/sec card
Hi Jens,
If you depend on chimping in your workflow, I understand your frustration with
the 645D.
My cards are not as fast as yours, and get a time lag of about four and a half
seconds. But saving to the card is just the second half of that time. The first
half is data readout from the CCD
http://www.shutterbug.com/content/medium-format-under-5k-pentax-sharply-drops-price-40mp-645d
stan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Quoting Stanley Halpin s...@stans-photography.info:
http://www.shutterbug.com/content/medium-format-under-5k-pentax-sharply-drops-price-40mp-645d
Great!!
Now if I get one it just costs the arm and I can keep the leg...
--
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
-40mp-645d
Great!!
Now if I get one it just costs the arm and I can keep the leg...
--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
immortality through not dying.
-- Woody Allen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
could sell my car, and three more like it and have enough for the
necessary computer upgrade as well...
On 8/26/2014 5:52 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Stanley Halpin s...@stans-photography.info:
http://www.shutterbug.com/content/medium-format-under-5k-pentax-sharply-drops-price-40mp-645d
More good signs that, under Ricoh, Pentax has a better marketing
department than they did under Hoya. I thought it was really lame when
they called it the 645D 2014 (which would be dated as soon as 2015
rolls around. That haD all the originality of Windows 98). I knew they
just COULDN'T keep
http://www.photographybay.com/2014/04/02/pentax-z-medium-format-camera-teaser/?awt_l=6EQhYawt_m=JsQjDsMesf62xu
stan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
David Mann dmann...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 6, 2014, at 1:10 pm, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Film duplication accessory
Model name (tentative):PENTAX Film Duplicator
Produces digital duplicates of silver-halide-film images in
combination with a digital SLR camera and a
Uses a CMOS sensor is all they're saying. Almost certainly one of the
new Sony ones.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2014/02/05/ricoh-promises-reference-products-including-cmos-645d-at-cp?utm_campaign=internal-linkutm_source=news-listutm_medium=textref=title_0_3
--
Mark Roberts - Photography
Photo rumors is reporting:
http://photorumors.com/2014/02/05/ricoh-wg-4-wg-20-pentax-1-4x-converter-announced-645d-2014-coming-next-week/#more-54352
Ultra-wide-angle zoom lens for use with the 645D
Telephoto macro for the Q
Film duplication accessory
Model name (tentative):PENTAX Film
the original 645D and
better AF also.
I won't be terribly surprised if it lists for more than the original
645D did also. It would still look like a bargain compared to the
Hassy and PhaseOne options using the same sensor.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
Some photos of the new 645D here:
http://photorumors.com/2014/02/05/new-pentax-645d-medium-format-camera-pictures-and-some-rumors/
And also of Pentax's film duplicator, which seems like a bizarre
product to release in the year 2014.
Cheers,
--M.
\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com
It's Pentax's implementation of full frame digital.
On February 5, 2014 8:50:38 PM PST, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
Some photos of the new 645D here:
http://photorumors.com/2014/02/05/new-pentax-645d-medium-format-camera-pictures-and-some-rumors/
And also of Pentax's film duplicator
On Feb 6, 2014, at 1:10 pm, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Film duplication accessory
Model name (tentative):PENTAX Film Duplicator
Produces digital duplicates of silver-halide-film images in
combination with a digital SLR camera and a dedicated flash unit.
Compatible with 35mm-
First off, thanks (and congrats!) to the PDMLer who bought a 645D kit from
us. You're going to have a lot of fun with it. :)
Now I have one left. Same as before, it has very few actuations on it.
It's an open-box new camera, which means it's been taken out of the box to
show customers
23, 2013 6:40 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: FS Friday: Pentax 645D with AF 55mm f2.8 SDM lens
I bought a winder for my MX off of him years ago.
The MX is dead, but the winder still winds!
At 11:27 PM + 3/23/13, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Chris!
I think I bought
On 22/03/2013 9:26 AM, Chris Brogden wrote:
Hi, everyone. Old-timers may remember me from back in the day when Pentax
ran the list and the grass was at least +3 saturation greener.
I remember you as Ronaldo Bomfim.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bill
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2013 3:14 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: FS Friday: Pentax 645D with AF 55mm f2.8 SDM lens
On 22/03/2013 9:26 AM, Chris Brogden wrote:
Hi, everyone. Old-timers may remember me from back in the day when
Pentax ran
Hey Chris!
I think I bought something from you once. Maybe an LX?
Nice to see you again!
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Chris Brogden cbrog...@donsphoto.ca
Sent: March 22, 2013 3/22/13
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: FS Friday: Pentax 645D with AF 55mm f2.8
I bought a winder for my MX off of him years ago.
The MX is dead, but the winder still winds!
At 11:27 PM + 3/23/13, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Chris!
I think I bought something from you once. Maybe an LX?
Nice to see you again!
cheers,
frank
--
Steve Sharpe
d...@eastlink.ca
the street from St. Vital Centre)
Winnipeg, MB R2M 5M3
Ph: (204) 254-9075
Fax: (204) 253-7173
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bill
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2013 3:14 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: FS Friday: Pentax 645D with AF
on the
Oregon Coast) mailed me a few slides he had shot. The tonal range and
beautiful colours blew me away, and it wasn't long before I got my own 67II.
To the point: we brought in several 645D bodies from Pentax, and have sold
all of them except for our last two shelf models. These have been taken out
I'm just shocked that your local camera store has Pentax.
On 1/11/2013 10:58 AM, Bryan Jacoby wrote:
I was in my local camera store the other day, and to my amazement they
had a limited edition 645D with the (outrageously expensive) red paint
job on display. I never expected to see one
I'm calling Myth Busters.
Something tells me that 645D is a lot like the Bigfoot that turned out
to be a gorilla costume crammed full of roadkill and stuffed in a deep
freeze.
-- Walt
On 1/11/2013 10:03 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I'm just shocked that your local camera store has Pentax.
On 1
It's a pretty amazing store (especially since it's in Ashburn, VA,
which is not exactly like Manhattan). Last time I was there they had
a plain old black 645D, but I never expected to see a red one.
In another case they had a silver K-5, DA* 55, 16-50, and 50-135's,
some 645 lens, a K-30, an a K
On Jan 11, 2013, at 8:40 AM, Bryan Jacoby wrote:
It's a pretty amazing store (especially since it's in Ashburn, VA,
which is not exactly like Manhattan). Last time I was there they had
a plain old black 645D, but I never expected to see a red one.
What's the name of this store?
--
Larry
Planning on a pilgrimage?
On 1/11/2013 12:50 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Jan 11, 2013, at 8:40 AM, Bryan Jacoby wrote:
It's a pretty amazing store (especially since it's in Ashburn, VA,
which is not exactly like Manhattan). Last time I was there they had
a plain old black 645D, but I never
On 1/11/2013 11:50 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Jan 11, 2013, at 8:40 AM, Bryan Jacoby wrote:
It's a pretty amazing store (especially since it's in Ashburn, VA,
which is not exactly like Manhattan). Last time I was there they had
a plain old black 645D, but I never expected to see a red one
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Walt ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm betting it's Ace Photo:
http://acephoto.net/contact.aspx
Yep.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
From: P. J. Alling
On 1/11/2013 10:58 AM, Bryan Jacoby wrote:
I was in my local camera store the other day, and to my amazement they
had a limited edition 645D with the (outrageously expensive) red paint
job on display. I never expected to see one of those in the flesh.
If you have
,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: AlunFoto - Jostein Øksne p...@alunfoto.no
Sent: December 14, 2012 12/14/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Pentax 645D IR
J.C.O. is entirely right. Once superseded by another model, the 645D
will stop taking pictures on any
the ice-loving peoples of the world are one of Pentax's largest
markets, Frank. I'm surprised you don't know that. Just last year alone
sales reached nearly double figures, and there's rumoured to be a
special edition coming out that smells of herring.
B
We have a few days of -20 to -30
- Jostein Øksne p...@alunfoto.no
Sent: December 14, 2012 12/14/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Pentax 645D IR
J.C.O. is entirely right. Once superseded by another model, the 645D will stop
taking pictures on any ISO other than 140, force JPG format, and introduce a
lag
On Dec 14, 2012, at 09:23 , William Robb wrote:
Pentax set themselves up to fail in this regard some 25 years ago when they
decided to become the budget brand. They set themselves up as a brand that no
one would spend real money on.
It's probably got a lot to do with why you bought into
From: P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
DxOMark gives sensor in the D800E with an overall rating of 96 for
quality, and the Pentax 645D an 82. The Nikon has an effective EV range
of over 14 stops the Pentax about 12. The Nikon has a 36.3mp sensor
with linear values of 7360x4912, which
Photographers that want to shoot MFD are going to use MFD, not FF
35mm. It doesn't matter that the D800 has a similar number of pixels.
The DoF is different, handling is different, sensor performance is different.
Having held and looked through a D700 (close enough to a D800) and a
645D
through a D700 (close enough to a D800) and a
645D, they are nothing alike. You'd never want to pick one over the
other without actually using them. Deciding only based on specs is
foolhardy.
Buying a camera based only on specifications is like marrying someone based
only on their height
enough to a D800) and a
645D, they are nothing alike. You'd never want to pick one over the
other without actually using them. Deciding only based on specs is
foolhardy.
I suppose there will always be a reason for MF digital, and given that
sensor technology and usable resolution continue
On Dec 15, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Dec 15, 2012, at 11:25 AM, David Parsons wrote:
... Deciding only based on specs is foolhardy.
Buying a camera based only on specifications is like marrying someone based
only on their height, weight and hair color. Sometimes the
On 12/15/2012 4:34 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
On Dec 15, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Dec 15, 2012, at 11:25 AM, David Parsons wrote:
... Deciding only based on specs is foolhardy.
Buying a camera based only on specifications is like marrying someone based
only on their height,
On Dec 15, 2012, at 4:39 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
On 12/15/2012 4:34 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
On Dec 15, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Dec 15, 2012, at 11:25 AM, David Parsons wrote:
... Deciding only based on specs is foolhardy.
Buying a camera based only on specifications is
J.C.O. is entirely right. Once superseded by another model, the 645D will stop
taking pictures on any ISO other than 140, force JPG format, and introduce a
lag of 30 seconds before writing exposures to card. During that lag, you will
see a message on the chimp screen explaining what you have
On 13 December 2012 18:26, Dario Bonazza dario.bona...@virgilio.it wrote:
Looks like it is:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/pentax-645d-ir-announced.html
It's December, not April? :(
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter
way possible.
regards, Anthony
On 14 December 2012 19:09, AlunFoto - Jostein Øksne p...@alunfoto.no wrote:
J.C.O. is entirely right. Once superseded by another model, the 645D will
stop taking pictures on any ISO other than 140, force JPG format, and
introduce a lag of 30 seconds before
On 13/12/2012 11:25 PM, Tom C wrote:
From: William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com
On 13/12/2012 11:57 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
And presto, you have a $10K obsolete piece o crap original 645D.
How is it obsolete? I don't think they stop working when another camera
comes out, and when
, 2012 at 8:38 AM, William Robb
anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/12/2012 11:25 PM, Tom C wrote:
From: William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com
On 13/12/2012 11:57 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
And presto, you have a $10K obsolete piece o crap original 645D.
How is it obsolete? I don't
From: Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info
From: Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com
Just a reminder: The odds may be long that you will beat Tom, but
nominations for PDML Troll of the Year are still open until Dec. 31st.
It's a shame when that word's misused to label one's who simply
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
Tom, your recent Pentax is dead post may not have been meant as a troll,
which I guess just shows your prowess when you can
do that good of a job without even trying.
In retrospect it was an emotional expedient exaggeration influenced by
a Canadian
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
In retrospect it was an emotional expedient exaggeration influenced by
a Canadian beverage which shall remain nameless.
You gotta lay off the poutine smoothies.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
viewfinder. :)
One of the differences between the two cameras that's obvious is the
price/performance ratio. The price of a 645D pretty much puts it out
of most people's reach, and if not their reach, it's costly enough
that it's hard to justify. At 1/3 of that, a D800/E is still a costly
item, but is down
, bright, spacious and a joy to look through, but I don't hear
complaints about the K-5 viewfinder. :)
One of the differences between the two cameras that's obvious is the
price/performance ratio. The price of a 645D pretty much puts it out
of most people's reach, and if not their reach, it's costly
This looks like it's going to be fun. I probably should make popcorn
before I settle in.
From: AlunFoto - Jostein ?ksne
J.C.O. is entirely right. Once superseded by another model, the 645D
will stop taking pictures on any ISO other than 140, force JPG
format, and introduce a lag of 30 seconds
ratio. The price of a 645D pretty much puts it out
of most people's reach, and if not their reach, it's costly enough
that it's hard to justify. At 1/3 of that, a D800/E is still a costly
item, but is down in a range where many more people are willing and
able to spend the money.
One could easily say
William Robb wrote:
I don't bother to complain any more, but it's pretty much a given that
APS-C sized viewfinders suck bunny bums.
Quote of the year.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: William Robb
Possibly Pentax should have been a bit more down to earth and spent
their RD money on a FF system that far more people would be
interested in obtaining. With the 645D, even most Pentaxophiles give
it simply a cursory glance because it's more or less unattainable.
It wouldn't
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 1:57 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Wouldn't bother me. With only a very few exceptions all of my lenses are
either DG (i.e. full frame digital) or legacy film lenses that already
cover 24x36 mm.
Yep, yep. What John said.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
DxOMark gives sensor in the D800E with an overall rating of 96 for
quality, and the Pentax 645D an 82. The Nikon has an effective EV range
of over 14 stops the Pentax about 12. The Nikon has a 36.3mp sensor
with linear values of 7360x4912, which gives a 300dpi print size without
undue
design hasn't transmogrified since the
early days I am pretty sure that I would prefer the D800 finder over
the 645D finder information overload or not.
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio
--
PDML Pentax
From: Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com
In retrospect it was an emotional expedient exaggeration influenced by
a Canadian beverage which shall remain nameless.
You gotta lay off the poutine smoothies.
That's way over my head Matthew. I know it has something to do with
french fries in a blender.
(Ok, I'll start...)
Just when I thought things couldn't get any more niche-y than a Q, a
K-01, or a $10k camera...
;)
-c
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Dario Bonazza
dario.bona...@virgilio.it wrote:
Looks like it is:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/pentax-645d-ir-announced.html
--
PDML
, or a $10k camera...
;)
-c
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Dario Bonazza
dario.bona...@virgilio.it wrote:
Looks like it is:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/pentax-645d-ir-announced.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-645d-ir-announced.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
Nice, but my Hoya R72 is cheaper:-)
Dave
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Dario Bonazza
dario.bona...@virgilio.it wrote:
Looks like it is:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/pentax-645d-ir-announced.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
Unfortunatly this doesn't address the main problem, The Nikon D800
pretty much equals the image quality of low end medium format DSLRs in a
35mm body format. Pentax Ricoh needs to announce a higher resolution
improved image quality upgrade to the 645d real soon now.
On 12/13/2012 2:26 AM
And presto, you have a $10K obsolete piece o crap original 645D.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P. J. Alling
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:53 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
From: J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net
And presto, you have a $10K obsolete piece o crap original 645D.
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P. J. Alling
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:53 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
From: J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net
And presto, you have a $10K obsolete piece o crap original 645D.
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P. J. Alling
Sent: Thursday, December
LOL
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
From: J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net
And presto, you have a $10K obsolete piece o crap original 645D.
-Original Message-
From: PDML
From: Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
From: J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net
And presto, you have a $10K obsolete piece o crap original 645D.
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf
, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
From: J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net
And presto, you have a $10K obsolete piece o crap original 645D.
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P. J. Alling
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012
On Dec 13, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Tom C wrote:
From: Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com
Just a reminder: The odds may be long that you will beat Tom, but
nominations for PDML Troll of the Year are still open until Dec. 31st.
It's a shame when that word's misused to label one's who simply don't
All around--the whole thread--too funny! :-) Cheers, Christine
On Dec 13, 2012, at 3:29 PM, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
On Dec 13, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Tom C wrote:
From: Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com
Just a reminder: The odds may be long that you will beat Tom,
1 - 100 of 1757 matches
Mail list logo
