First, the analogue version of the picture Jostein showed a few weeks
ago (there's no need to compare.):
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/channel/50/extra/new/display/5542508
Then, one from last year:
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3407/display/5542601
mike
I finally managed to get out with the 600 and do some shooting.
This les is a challenge to shoot with, to be sure.
Anyone using long lenses (Ken, Tom!!!) any tips or advice for using one of
these beasties would be appreciated.
Anyway, a couple of my less embarrasing atempts with the big gun are
Warning, this one has both a cat and a dog in it.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/peso/LeicaT-Max2.jpg
Don't know what to say about this one.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/peso/126_26.jpg
William Robb
A bridge support over our local swamp/creek.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/newer/bridge.html
The fountain at the SaskPower head office.
I think the depth of field is a bit shallow on this one.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/newer/fountain.html
Both shot with the 77mm lens.
You need to like dogs for this one.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/recent/bigtongue.html
I decided to do my own full moon picture tonight. I don't know why.
This was shot with the K10 behind the A600/5.6 and 2XL teleconverter. The
camera was mounted to the Wimberley head on the Zo
Decided to get off my backside and try shooting some RAW (well, DNG
actually).
While on the way out the door with the macro lens I heard a grey
warbler so I hurried back to get the FA 200mm instead. I hear them
all the time but it's very rarely I'll see one, much less photograph
one. Thi
On January 2 I had a long drive from Corrales, New Mexico to Logan,
Utah, but managed to get in a couple of photos along the way.
In Farmington, New Mexico (K10D + DA* 50-135):
Real Southwest IX:
http://aycu37.webshots.com/image/40036/2000149075306466492_rs.jpg
(I haven't posted a Real Southwe
Eye exams for the blinds
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5743795050/in/set-72157626647707757/
Eight eyes:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5741286611/in/set-72157626643301975/
(and legs)
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.ne
A Geranium:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/geranium2.html
and some sort of water feature.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrphoto/garden1.html
Both were shot with the always lovely FA*200/4 macro, which was as nice
as ever.
Both are stacks.
The flower is 17 layers, the other picture is 7 laye
I actually took a camera with me today when I went out to get a few
steps in - so for you non Facebook pals
here are two : sorry, not Pentax - Had to take the light weight one -
NIkon cool Pix.
St Marks Place between 1st and 2nd ave..
https://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/2022-
en.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax Discuss"
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 2:55 AM
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
I was trying to keep the shutter speed up, these were shot at ISO 400, at
around 1/1000 second. The ape
- Original Message -
From: "Herb Chong"
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
i have never shot with my 400/2.8 at any aperture other than f2.8. there
isn't any point with a lens of this type. if you could use a smaller
aperture, you wouldn't need that lens. also, if P
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Reese"
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
The lens is twitchy for sure. For maximum sharpness, I recommend use of a
very solid tripod, a cable release and mirror lockup when you can. Use all
three if your subject allows it. Tripod and cab
- Original Message -
From: "Kenneth Waller"
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
>Do you use the shutter button or the remote release?
I generally use the shutter release.
I'm kinda leaning that way, in some respects I think I can steady the thing
a bit myself.
@ $20). I'm about to set out for a week long shoot
and will hopefully get a chance to give the remote a workout with that
combo.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
>
> - Original Mess
t very practical, if you are
tracking a moving subject.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tom Reese"
> Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
currents become
too much for good sharpness. i prefer to work at no more than 200 ft if i
can help it. for small bird work, i prefer 30-40ft.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: A cou
ginal Message -
From: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
BTW, I noticed Mark Roberts using his infra red remote release @ GFM and
it
got me thinking about using it with my 600/*ist D combo. I picke
- Original Message -
From: "Herb Chong"
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
something else to consider is that heat haze has much more effect than you
would guess from what you can see through the viewfinder. i figure that
the working range of my setup of a 400/2.8 wit
>i think you will lose the benefit of your arm over the lens damping the
vibration.
Actually Herb, I was planning on using the remote while keeping my arm draped
over the 600.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Herb Chong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: A couple of
i also count on my other hand and face to damp too. perhaps taping the
remote on the lens? i would use the corded remote in that case.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: A
On 8/21/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I finally managed to get out with the 600 and do some shooting.
> This les is a challenge to shoot with, to be sure.
> Anyone using long lenses (Ken, Tom!!!) any tips or advice for using one of
> these beasties would be appreciated.
>
> Anyway,
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
They let you take pix near airports with big honking lenses in
Saskatchewan?
It's pretty laid back here.
I like the shots, BTW.
Thanks
b...
that bridge is very dramatic.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 April 2006 19:42
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: A couple of PESOs
>
> First, the analogue version of the picture Jostein show
Strange, when I went to that page I got a digital image. I was really
expecting my computer to spit out a paper print after your preamble. :^)
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
mike w
It did for me. Must be something wrong with your modem.
>
> Strange, when I went to that page I got a digital image. I
> was really expecting my computer to spit out a paper print
> after your preamble. :^)
>
> graywolf
> http://www.graywolfphoto.com
> http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
>
In a message dated 4/28/2006 11:47:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
First, the analogue version of the picture Jostein showed a few weeks
ago (there's no need to compare.):
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/channel/50/extra/new/display/5542508
Then, one from last year
The series of eight bridges from about 1830 to 2000, within a mile, is
magnificent.
Bob W wrote:
that bridge is very dramatic.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 April 2006 19:42
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: A couple
On 29/4/06, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>The series of eight bridges from about 1830 to 2000, within a mile, is
>magnificent.
Eight bridges in 90 minutes...that include some pubs along the way?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http:
Cotty wrote:
On 29/4/06, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
The series of eight bridges from about 1830 to 2000, within a mile, is
magnificent.
Eight bridges in 90 minutes...that include some pubs along the way?
You lose count after two dozen.
On 8/21/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I finally managed to get out with the 600 and do some shooting.
> This les is a challenge to shoot with, to be sure.
> Anyone using long lenses (Ken, Tom!!!) any tips or advice for using one of
> these beasties would be appreciated.
>
> Anyway,
Bill,
Gotta love how the distance is compressed with that lens. I rather
like the look of these. It seems the lens is pretty darn good.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, August 20, 2005, 9:17:44 PM, you wrote:
WR> I finally managed to get out with the 600 and do some shooting.
WR> This les i
BTW I like the second shot.
In the background is that heat haze, jpeg artifacts or just really bad bokeh?
Dave
On 8/21/05, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/21/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I finally managed to get out with the 600 and do some shooting.
> > This le
On 20/8/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Anyway, a couple of my less embarrasing atempts with the big gun are
>here
>http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/wingedrats1.html
>http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/wingedrats2.html
I like the second one - that hea
- Original Message -
From: "David Savage"
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
BTW I like the second shot.
In the background is that heat haze, jpeg artifacts or just really bad
bokeh?
Might be heat haze. I was shooting across an airport runway.
William Robb
Hi Bill,
Considering that you were trying to shoot birds in flight, you seem to
have done a reasonably good job of getting them in focus on that second
shot, although it would be nice if they were a bit closer. There
doesn't seem to be any evidence of camera shake, so your tripod setup
must be
William Robb wrote:
I finally managed to get out with the 600 and do some shooting.
This les is a challenge to shoot with, to be sure.
I would think so!
What was the camera attached to it?
With a 35mm camera, you're talking about a 12X magnification.
Try hand holding a 12X telescope sometime,
Shooting hint: Camo netting, a drum of mosquito
repellent and plenty of something to help discourage
"chiggers" from burrowing into your ankles.
Tolerance to extremity numbness, a plus.
Major tripod only manageable as a result of an intense
long term regime of physical conditioning.
A final conclus
- Original Message -
From: "keithw"
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
.
This les is a challenge to shoot with, to be sure.
I would think so!
What was the camera attached to it?
That was the istD.
With a 35mm camera, you're talking about a 12X magnification.
Try
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
Hi Bill,
Considering that you were trying to shoot birds in flight, you seem to
have done a reasonably good job of getting them in focus on that second
shot, although it would be nice if they
Your comment leads me to think about adding an extension tube or two to the
lens and using it for close-up or macro work.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: William Robb
> ...after having the lens for almost 2 weeks and not making a
> singel exposure with it, I was getting kinda antsy to try i
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff"
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
Your comment leads me to think about adding an extension tube or two to
the
lens and using it for close-up or macro work.
Butterflies from 30 feet should be possible
William Robb
>Gotta love how the distance is compressed with that lens.
>Bruce
Even makes Saskatchewan look cozy. :)
Nice shots Bill. Flying birds, even large ratish ones, are not easy. You
could practice on something easier like a gofer.
Powell
>Saturday, August 20, 2005, 9:17:44 PM, you wrote:
>
>WR>
Seems to perform nicely on the D, Bill.
Joe
Good job on number 2.
Evan
bb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 12:18 AM
To: Pentax Discuss
Subject: A couple of PESOs
I finally managed to get out with the 600 and do some shooting.
This les is a challenge to shoot with, to be sure.
Anyone using long lenses (Ken, Tom!!!) any tips or advice for usi
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 12:18 AM
To: Pentax Discuss
Subject: A couple of PESOs
I finally managed to get out with the 600 and do some shooting.
This les is a challenge to shoot with, to be sure.
Anyone using long lenses (Ken, Tom!!!) any tips or advice for using
one
t: Sunday, August 21, 2005 4:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
Great shot, Bill. I know we've seen it before, but I still love it.
Could you fashion a mount adapter for the tripod mount that would give
better balance? It seems like that might be an easy thing to do.
Paul
bably get better results with more
interesting subjects.
You might enjoy using this lens @ a nearby Zoo just for the practice.
Oh, and be careful around airports, it might be mistaken for a RPG launcher!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
At 08:11 PM 8/21/2005, Kenneth Waller wrote:
I drape my left arm over the barrel of my 600 to load it
and dampen any potential vibration...
Wouldn't a sandbag or a bag of lead shot be better? It wouldn't exhibit any
minor muscle tremors, and it wouldn't have blood pulsing through it.
take
William,
Seriously, shot #2 is a nice grab. If you've indicated
whether the 600 is an AF or MF, I missed it.
Do you have stalking "wildlife" plans or to just check
your reaction to random "compression" shots until a
direction happens?
While I have no experience "hints" to pass along, I'm
certain y
- Original Message -
From: "Powell Hargrave"
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
Even makes Saskatchewan look cozy. :)
Nice shots Bill. Flying birds, even large ratish ones, are not easy. You
could practice on something easier like a gofer.
Thanks, Powell.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Tainter"
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
Seems to perform nicely on the D, Bill.
It seems pretty good. I want to make some prints and see how it looks. I did
a lot of sharpening on the web images.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Evan Hanson"
Subject: RE: A couple of PESOs
Good job on number 2.
Thanks Evan
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "william sawyer"
Subject: RE: A couple of PESOs
Bill,
I've had this lens for about 2 years now, and agree with everything you've
said. I describe it as a long stovepipe, with the mount stuck on one end.
I'm surprised you ar
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis"
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
William,
Seriously, shot #2 is a nice grab. If you've indicated
whether the 600 is an AF or MF, I missed it.
It is manual focus.
Do you have stalking "wildlife" plans or to just chec
- Original Message -
From: "Kenneth Waller"
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
Anyone using long lenses (Ken, Tom!!!) any tips or advice for using one
of
these beasties would be appreciated.
Bill, first of all shoot, shoot and shoot some more.
I don't know what shutter
They look it
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: William Robb
> I want to make some prints and see how it looks. I did
> a lot of sharpening on the web images.
rom: Glen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
At 08:11 PM 8/21/2005, Kenneth Waller wrote:
>I drape my left arm over the barrel of my 600 to load it
>and dampen any potential vibration...
Wouldn't a sandbag or a bag of lead shot be better? It wouldn't exhibit any
William Robb wrote:
I finally managed to get out with the 600 and do some shooting.
This les is a challenge to shoot with, to be sure.
Anyone using long lenses (Ken, Tom!!!) any tips or advice for using one
of these beasties would be appreciated.
Anyway, a couple of my less embarrasing atempts
William Robb wrote:
...so I tried
to take a picture of an airliner taking off.
Couldn't track it until it was a mere speck, so I decided to try
something slower moving.
Now you understand how frustrated I was trying to shoot eagles on the
fly a few weeks ago. Panning with that lens is a chal
er
-Original Message-
From: William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
- Original Message -
From: "Kenneth Waller"
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
>> Anyone using long lenses (Ken, Tom!!!) any tips or advice for using one
>&
The cat and dog are priceless. Nice shot. I like the warm feeling of the window
light, and of course the pose is fabulous. Good work.
The wire towers are neat, but i'd like to see the shot rotated about 1 degree
counterclockwise. But then again, I'm a little bit obsessive about those
verticals.
Well, you may find this hilarious, but the one of Leica and TMax remind me
of a few snaps Elliott Erwitt made of his wife and their new baby back, oh
so many years ago. It's really not much like Erwitt's photo in many ways,
but yet there's enough of a similarity in terms of composition that I could
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
The cat and dog are priceless. Nice shot. I like the warm feeling
of the window light, and of course the pose is fabulous. Good
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 21:19:38 -0600, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Warning, this one has both a cat and a dog in it.
>
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/peso/LeicaT-Max2.jpg
>
> Don't know what to say about this one.
>
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/peso/126_26.jpg
>
> William Ro
William Robb wrote:
Warning, this one has both a cat and a dog in it.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/peso/LeicaT-Max2.jpg
Awww, that's so cute.
Don't know what to say about this one.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/peso/126_26.jpg
I know what to say, it's one of those things that was an intere
William Robb wrote on 12/6/2004, 10:19 PM:
> Warning, this one has both a cat and a dog in it.
>
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/peso/LeicaT-Max2.jpg
"...dogs and cats living together..."
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 10:40 PM
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <
I'd crop this one from the top at about the 2 o'clock line on the
clock ... the top of the frame has poor bokeh and nothing which adds
to the imaging of the fountain.
Godfrey
On Jul 11, 2008, at 9:04 AM, William Robb wrote:
> The fountain at the SaskPower head office.
> I think the depth of
bb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: A couple of PESOs
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Friday, July 11, 2008, 9:04 AM
> A bridge support over our local swamp/creek.
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/p
Like the bridge shot. Good sampling of man over nature theme.
Second one could use a bit mor OOF in the back ground.
Dave
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:04 PM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A bridge support over our local swamp/creek.
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/newer/bri
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: A couple of PESOs
>A bridge support over our local swamp/creek.
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/newer/bridge.html
An unusual subject
/11/08, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Friday, July 11, 2008, 12:30 PM
> Bridge support certainly makes the heavy footprint of man a
&g
at the right as well.
>
> Something about the fountains in the foreground and the OOF
> clock in the background appeals to me.
>
> Rick
>
>
> --- On Fri, 7/11/08, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&
I love the dog, except for the tongue :)
re the moon of yours and Mats - I guess these are good for seeing how
well a camera and lens
do their job, but I've always found closeups of the moon with nothing
else in it to be of limited interest.
But you deciding to leave the camera on the tripod wi
- Original Message -
From: "ann sanfedele" Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
>I love the dog, except for the tongue :)
Ahh, it's the tongue that makes the picture. Otherwise it's just a cute shot
of an adorable puppy.
>
> re the moon of yours and Mats
I thought my Cocker had a big tongue...
William Robb wrote:
> You need to like dogs for this one.
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/recent/bigtongue.html
>
> I decided to do my own full moon picture tonight. I don't know why.
> This was shot with the K10 behind the A600/5.6 and 2XL
Bill,
Like 'em both, but the dog one more.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, January 2, 2007, 11:10:54 PM, you wrote:
WR> You need to like dogs for this one.
WR> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/recent/bigtongue.html
WR> I decided to do my own full moon picture tonight. I don't know why.
WR> T
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You need to like dogs for this one.
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/recent/bigtongue.html
>
> I decided to do my own full moon picture tonight. I don't know why.
> This was shot with the K10 behind the A600/5.6 and 2XL teleconverter. The
> camera was
- Original Message -
From: "Gonz" Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
>> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/recent/fullmoon.html
>>
>
> The moon picture looks a little soft, that could be because of the SR
> interacting with the tripod, or the
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
> Bill,
>
> Like 'em both, but the dog one more.
Thanks Bruce. The moon picture was more of an excuse to do something rather
than nothing when I couldn't fall asleep.
William Ro
On 3/1/07, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
>But you deciding to leave the camera on the tripod with the SR on
>reminded me of when Cotty
>was showing us the (600?) with SR almost 2 years ago at GFM - it was
>certainly on a tripod.
>What goes with that?
It was a 70-200 2.8, possibly
Seems like we're getting mooned on the list.
Like the dog shot. Sure is a photogenic dog.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: A couple of PESOs
> You need to like dogs for this one.
> http://users.access
- Original Message -
From: "Kenneth Waller" Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
> Like the dog shot. Sure is a photogenic dog.
Thanks Ken. One of the members of my club raises Old English Sheepdogs, and
has competed with them all over the world, including Westminster in NYC.
Why do some lenses go over infinity focus? What is that good for?
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Gonz
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 8:10 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
[EMAIL
Hi!
> You need to like dogs for this one.
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/recent/bigtongue.html
I takes a long tongue to enjoy this kind of a bone, right? ;-)
>
> I decided to do my own full moon picture tonight. I don't know why.
> This was shot with the K10 behind the A600/5.
On 1/04/07 2:40 AM, "Markus Maurer", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why do some lenses go over infinity focus? What is that good for?
IIRC, this is done to compensate for the thermal expansion/contraction.
This is more profound in barrels made of aluminum such as Limiteds.
Longer FL lenses must ha
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Markus Maurer wrote:
> Why do some lenses go over infinity focus? What is that good for?
> greetings
> Markus
>
For AF lenses, it allows for overshoot in the AF control
algorithm. That will make for a faster and more accurate AF lock than if
the lens hits a hard sto
- Original Message -
From: "Markus Maurer" Subject: RE: A couple of PESOs
> Why do some lenses go over infinity focus? What is that good for?
> greetings
It allows the lens barrel to expand if it builds up heat inside it, and
still allow infinity focus.
William
Nice puppy shot. How old is it now?
The moon shot is a, moon shot.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: 3. januar 2007 08:11
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: A couple of
Cotty wrote:
>On 3/1/07, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>
>>But you deciding to leave the camera on the tripod with the SR on
>>reminded me of when Cotty
>>was showing us the (600?) with SR almost 2 years ago at GFM - it was
>>certainly on a tripod.
>>What goes with that?
>>
William Robb wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "ann sanfedele" Subject: Re: A couple of PESOs
>
>
>
>
>>I love the dog, except for the tongue :)
>>
>>
>
>Ahh, it's the tongue that makes the picture. Otherwise it's j
less (just plain Norwegian)
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> William Robb
> Sent: 3. januar 2007 08:11
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: A couple of PESOs
>
> You need to like dogs for this one.
> http://us
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Øsleby" Subject: RE: A couple of PESOs
> Nice puppy shot. How old is it now?
Jester is 7 months now, that shot was taken a few weeks ago though.
>
> The moon shot is a, moon shot.
Worse, it is a technically poor moon shot.
Tha
I quite like the one of the Warbler in it's environment.
Nice one.
Cheers,
Dave
On 7/22/07, David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Decided to get off my backside and try shooting some RAW (well, DNG
> actually).
>
> While on the way out the door with the macro lens I heard a grey
> warbler so
Hmmm. Pretty cluttered, both of them. Maybe you
should train the warbler to pose...
Rick
--- David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Decided to get off my backside and try shooting some
> RAW (well, DNG
> actually).
>
> While on the way out the door with the macro lens I
> heard a grey
> w
Wow - I love the Jesus photo. I bet it would be even better in Robert
Frankish black & white.
--
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Joseph Tainter
> Sent: 07 January 2008 00:16
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Subj
Love the first one. The second is even better.
Wonderful contrast in it.
Dave
On Jan 6, 2008 7:15 PM, Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On January 2 I had a long drive from Corrales, New Mexico to Logan,
> Utah, but managed to get in a couple of photos along the way.
>
> In Farmington,
Joe,
Got a good chuckle out of the first one - nicely seen.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, January 6, 2008, 4:15:34 PM, you wrote:
JT> On January 2 I had a long drive from Corrales, New Mexico to Logan,
JT> Utah, but managed to get in a couple of photos along the way.
JT> In Farmington, New
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
