Oh the OT stuff comes and goes. CN bashing went out with digital. They
are all basically the same camera after all (grin). Mafud has not been
heard from in a long, long while. Nice to see you back, Chris.
--
Chris Brogden wrote:
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:57:35 -0400, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 10:38:02 -0400, Graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip. Nice to see you back, Chris.
Yeah, welcome back, Chris!! What's shakin'?
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Mr. OConnell:
I could give more serious consideration to your point of view if you
could try to be a little less arrogant.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
It must suck to be vision impaired, he
states wide open right in the post.
I read it right the first time, you didn't.
His proof example only proves
A double header at that...
John Forbes wrote:
Talking about interesting juxtapositions, look at the shape of the
parking meter.
John
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 21:59:12 -0400, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:07:01 -0600, William Robb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes
Subject: Re: A random snapshot
Talking about interesting juxtapositions, look at the shape of the
parking
meter.
I could have positioned that better.
b...
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola
Subject: Re: A random snapshot
Mr. OConnell:
I could give more serious consideration to your point of view if
you
could try to be a little less arrogant.
Whee, I missed that one.
For the record, my initial metering was done several
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: A random snapshot
You still havent got it yet. Let me explain
for the 4th time.
No John, I get it, you don't understand that for something that is
only going to affect my life once a decade, I am not going to pay
much heed
[sigh]
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
You still havent got it yet. Let me explain
for the 4th time.
Hear, hear!
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Bill, why do you waste your time with JCO on this issue. The friggin
thread's been going on for a week or so, nothing's going to get thru to
JCO. He's busy talking theoretical hyperbole, you, Paul, and others are
talking about what's practical, realistic, and
-
Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 23. september 2004 22:07
Til: Pentax Discuss
Emne: A random snapshot
This one was taken last night. The resteraunt we had supper at is a
few doors down from the local adult toy store, and this caught my eye
for some reason.
Technically
feature compared to the open aperture
metering OPTIONAL feature.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 1:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A random snapshot
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:45:52 +0100, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that the five minute relief, or the full half hour?
I paid for five minutes, but it didn't take nearly that long. rimshot
-knarf
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele
Subject: Re: A random snapshot
(snip)
ann said
Your hands are a lot steady than mine - :)
Bruce Rubenstein said the same thing.
LOL!
Thanks for looking
b
thanks for shotting something worth looking at :)
a...
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:57:35 -0400, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can shoot totally manual too, even without a light
meter. What does that prove with regards to the subject?
Nothing. I was arguing open aperture TTL metering
is better than stop down TTL metering, not whether I
Chris Brogden wrote:
Whatever happened to politics, Mafud, and C/N bashing?
Bush will win anyway, Mafud is gone and we all switched either to C or
N. So we just post some pics from time to time and debate metering.
Sorry, Chris
Dang. And here I was hoping for at least one good argument on missile defence.
Ah well...
Oh, I've got a few gmail invites to give away, so if anyone's
interested, write me off-list. You get 1GB of storage, the ability to
send 10MB attachments, and a cool interface that groups threads as a
If I didn't know you any better, I would believe the restaurant story
;-) C'mon Bill tell us what you really were up to that night ;-)
William Robb wrote:
This one was taken last night. The resteraunt we had supper at is a
few doors down from the local adult toy store, and this caught my eye
for
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This one was taken last night. The resteraunt we had supper
at is a few doors down from the local adult toy store, and
this caught my eye for some reason.
Technically, this shot should not have worked, judging from
Hi,
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/lovebike.jpg
hey, that looks like Frank's bike.
--
Cheers,
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Bob W
Subject: Re: A random snapshot
Hi,
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/lovebike.jpg
hey, that looks like Frank's bike.
I was thinking of him when I took the picture, though not enough to
forget to focus.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: tom
Subject: RE: A random snapshot
So, how much does love cost?
Depends, big boy.
HAR!!!
WW
On 23/9/04, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/lovebike.jpg
Handheld, wide open, I think for 1/100 second, sensitivity set to
400.
Very appropriate ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
tom wrote:
So, how much does love cost?
If you have to ask, then it's not for you, sir !
;-)
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:01:11 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking of him when I took the picture, though not enough to
forget to focus.
Okay, Wheatfield, that's the second crack you've made today about me
and (non) focusing!!
Not that I have a problem with it. Just
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 21:55:57 +0100, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/lovebike.jpg
hey, that looks like Frank's bike.
So, I'm on a cross-country solo bike tour, and I'm a bit, you know,
tense. I'm in this big hick-town, looking for relief, if ya know
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:07:01 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one was taken last night. The resteraunt we had supper at is a
few doors down from the local adult toy store, and this caught my eye
for some reason.
Technically, this shot should not have worked, judging from
It brings up a logical question but I won't ask it.
William Robb wrote:
This one was taken last night. The resteraunt we had supper at is a
few doors down from the local adult toy store, and this caught my eye
for some reason.
Technically, this shot should not have worked, judging from recent
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 11:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A random snapshot
It brings up a logical question but I won't ask it.
William Robb wrote:
This one was taken last night. The resteraunt we had supper at is a few
doors down from the local
]
Subject: Re: A random snapshot
It brings up a logical question but I won't ask it.
William Robb wrote:
This one was taken last night. The resteraunt we had supper at is a
few
doors down from the local adult toy store, and this caught my eye for
some reason. Technically, this shot should not have
actually stop down! Wide open aperure setting
is not stopped down one bit.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 11:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A random snapshot
It brings up a logical question but I won't ask
William Robb wrote:
This one was taken last night. The resteraunt we had supper at is a
few doors down from the local adult toy store, and this caught my eye
for some reason.
Technically, this shot should not have worked, judging from recent
discussion.
It was shot well afer dark with a K
them let alone prove
them wrong isnt very impressive I must say.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 12:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A random snapshot
I think he said it was shot with a 50/1.4 lens. I don't
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: A random snapshot
I think he said it was shot with a 50/1.4 lens. I don't think he
said
the stop was 1.4. Reread Bill's message.
It must suck to be so angry about cameras.
It was shot wide open, I think my lens was initially
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: A random snapshot
Nice shot, Bill. It's a subject the goes well with the night
lighting.
Thanks Paul.
b...
34 matches
Mail list logo
