)
From:eactiv...@aol.com
To:pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Anyone have the Pentax X-5? or Q7?
Message-ID:d28e7.18b987dc.3f70a...@aol.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
I am not sold on any bridge camera, but if I get Pentax, I think I will go
for the MX-1.
Mainly because it supports RAW files
, 22 Sep 2013 16:15:06 -0400 (EDT)
From:eactiv...@aol.com
To:pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Anyone have the Pentax X-5? or Q7?
Message-ID:d28e7.18b987dc.3f70a...@aol.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
I am not sold on any bridge camera, but if I get Pentax, I think I will go
Not much (re how much). I was actually serious about maybe getting one. So
weird, so fun.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 9/23/2013 12:30:00 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
shark50...@gmail.com writes:
Aw Marnie do not mock my beloved K-01. It is my carry-around back-up and
often main
DPreview gave the MX-1 a good score. The write times can be a bit slow, but
the reviewer really liked everything else. I'm thinking of the MX-1 myself at
some point. I'd give it a serious look, Marnie!
Cheers, Christine
On Sep 22, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
I like the Q and expect that I'll like the Q-7 even more, though I have
no plans on buying one immediately. I travel a lot for work and the Q is
a perfect travel kit - the Q, 2 zooms, normal prime and fisheye fit in
a case that is about the size of lens case for a normal 35mm zoom. WHen
I was
Thanks!, Mark. I've really wondered about the Q. Seems sort of like
Pentax's answer to micro3/4 /compact cameras (well, I see it that way).
Nice shots. Especially like the brick reflection in window.
You've raised my hopes, I will look into it. I wouldn't mind owning a
Pentax again. A
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Thanks!, Mark. I've really wondered about the Q. Seems sort of like
Pentax's answer to micro3/4 /compact cameras (well, I see it that way).
Yes, it is, but even the Q7 only has 1/1.7 sensor (same size as the
P7100/P7800/DMC-LF1 I've been
I understand all that, but it also allows for the PUG and annual. Unless
the rules have changed. ?
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 9/22/2013 6:57:28 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
a...@pobox.com writes:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Thanks!, Mark. I've really
Look at some 100% samples from the X-5. I've owned some bridge cameras
and the panny ones were always the best IMO with support for RAW and
great lenses. The X-5 samples look pretty awful full size. Everything
looks like watercolors in a bad way. You could do a whole lot better
for the price. I
I am not sold on any bridge camera, but if I get Pentax, I think I will go
for the MX-1.
Mainly because it supports RAW files. There are tons of nicer compact
cameras out there, some pretty pricey, some not. Many of the ones people have
suggested to me. But I am coming from a specialized
You might be interested to look at this short thread on GetDPI.com:
http://www.getdpi.com/forum/pentax/43010-new-pentax-mx-1-a.html
G
On Sep 22, 2013, at 1:15 PM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
I am not sold on any bridge camera, but if I get Pentax, I think I will go
for the MX-1.
Mainly
Thanks. Not a bad review, at all.
M aka D
In a message dated 9/22/2013 1:19:06 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
godd...@me.com writes:
You might be interested to look at this short thread on GetDPI.com:
http://www.getdpi.com/forum/pentax/43010-new-pentax-mx-1-a.html
G
--
PDML
On 9/22/2013 4:15 PM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
The MX-1 is cute and retro, and K-01 is downright funky.
I understand the odor goes away with time.
On 9/22/2013 4:15 PM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
I am not sold on any bridge camera, but if I get Pentax, I think I will go
for the MX-1.
Should have put Q7 also in subject line.
In a message dated 9/21/2013 10:01:53 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
eactiv...@aol.com writes:
Sort of narrowing down my choices for my main camera system.
But been looking at having a little fixed lens camera for travel
situations (like Disneyland
I don't own one but I did research a while ago, for pretty much the
reasons you've got. The bottom line appears that the Pentax X-5 is
really just another bridge camera pretty much like all other bridge
cameras. It's a small sensor, though quality is supposed to pretty good
up to ISO 400.
15 matches
Mail list logo