Re: Organizing photo archives (was Re: Old Shutterbug articles)

Love that first one! .. and like the second more upon reading your post with the rhyme in it.. I thought I was going to organize even more and prune and scan for several years.. it isn't happening.. but when I was still sending stuff to stock agency back in the late 80's and early 90's I had

Re: Organizing photo archives (was Re: Old Shutterbug articles)

A friend of mine retired with similar thoughts, tried, got too lazy. I convinced him to package up all his old slides and negs, send them to ScanCafe.com. He did, paid a good bit of money for the work, and they did a great job. Of course, his innate laziness and sloth means he now has a huge

Re: Organizing photo archives (was Re: Old Shutterbug articles)

Am 01.12.22 um 21:12 schrieb l...@red4est.com: I love the Seussian nature of the second title It's an old German counting rhyme for childrens' games. Eins zwei, Polizei, drei, vier, Grenadier, fünf, sechs, alte Hex, sieben, acht, Gute Nacht. The 'alte Hex' is an old witch. The rest should be

Re: Organizing photo archives (was Re: Old Shutterbug articles)

I love the Seussian nature of the second title On December 1, 2022 12:03:29 PM PST, Ralf R Radermacher wrote: >Am 01.12.22 um 20:40 schrieb Godfrey DiGiorgi: > >> I have my old libraries of slides and film. I scanned them all once, years >> ago, but scanning tools and image processing

Re: Organizing photo archives (was Re: Old Shutterbug articles)

Am 01.12.22 um 20:40 schrieb Godfrey DiGiorgi: I have my old libraries of slides and film. I scanned them all once, years ago, but scanning tools and image processing methodology has improved so dramatically since then that I might just re-scan them all. I'll review my old scans and, if

Re: Organizing photo archives (was Re: Old Shutterbug articles)

A friend of mine retired with similar thoughts, tried, got too lazy. I convinced him to package up all his old slides and negs, send them to ScanCafe.com. He did, paid a good bit of money for the work, and they did a great job. Of course, his innate laziness and sloth means he now has a huge

Re: Organizing photo archives (was Re: Old Shutterbug articles)

Divide and conquer! I retired a couple of years ago with the same intentions. After a few half-hearted first attempts then putting everything in a cupboard for 18 months, I now have a process I’m fairly happy with. Once you’re happy with your set-up you’ll probably be able to raw scan each

Re: Organizing photo archives (was Re: Old Shutterbug articles)

Just looking around the room, I have 22 loose-leaf notebooks filled with slide pages, and 9 140-slide carousels. I always told myself I’d do something about them when I retired… but in a year and a half nothing has happened yet. Rick > On Nov 29, 2022, at 1:38 AM, Larry Colen wrote: > >

Re: Organizing photo archives (was Re: Old Shutterbug articles)

> On Nov 28, 2022, at 9:27 PM, John Francis wrote: > > > Of course before I can do any scanning I'm going to need to get a scanner. > While > the high-end Epson 800 looks nice, it costs a lot more than the 600. It also > gets > mixed reviews. I haven't started looking around seriously

Organizing photo archives (was Re: Old Shutterbug articles)

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 08:36:19PM -0500, Stan Halpin wrote: > I wish my brother John had done more sorting and purging. But his life got > complicated by Parkinson???s etc in 2015 and he was unwilling/unable to do > much with his photo archives or other stuff after that.

EMPATHY PDML ARCHIVES LIST

Is there any way of doing an advanced search like we could when the archives was stored on the old server? Year/Month, Author & Thread would be a useful start. Alan C -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the

Re: LINK TO ARCHIVES

:cough: On 2/12/21 3:01 PM, John wrote: On 2/12/2021 11:56:20, Steve Cottrell wrote: On 12/2/21, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed: I am working on a State of The List message Surely a State of The List Address - you need some PDML fags behind you, livestreamed from your Pentax of

Re: LINK TO ARCHIVES

I think somebody's auto-correct is stuck on Carnaby Street in the Swinging 60s! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90h2gLgTz5g On 2/12/2021 12:16:32, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: "PDML Fags"? Dan Matyola On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:56 AM Steve Cottrell wrote: On 12/2/21, Doug Brewer,

Re: LINK TO ARCHIVES

On 2/12/2021 11:56:20, Steve Cottrell wrote: On 12/2/21, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed: I am working on a State of The List message Surely a State of The List Address - you need some PDML fags behind you, livestreamed from your Pentax of of course! "Fans" or "Flags" maybe? Is

Re: LINK TO ARCHIVES

On 12/2/21, Bob Pdml, discombobulated, unleashed: >Does the PDML have an official cigarette? Smoke and mirrors? -- Cheers Cotty -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit

Re: LINK TO ARCHIVES

"PDML Fags"? Dan Matyola On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:56 AM Steve Cottrell wrote: > On 12/2/21, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >I am working on a State of The List message > > Surely a State of The List Address - you need some PDML fags behind you, > livestreamed from your

Re: LINK TO ARCHIVES

> On 12 Feb 2021, at 17:02, Bob Pdml wrote: > >  >> On 12 Feb 2021, at 16:56, Steve Cottrell wrote: >> >> On 12/2/21, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed: >> >>> I am working on a State of The List message >> >> Surely a State of The List Address - you need some PDML fags behind you,

Re: LINK TO ARCHIVES

> On 12 Feb 2021, at 16:56, Steve Cottrell wrote: > > On 12/2/21, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> I am working on a State of The List message > > Surely a State of The List Address - you need some PDML fags behind you, > livestreamed from your Pentax of of course! Does the

Re: LINK TO ARCHIVES

On 12/2/21, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed: >I am working on a State of The List message Surely a State of The List Address - you need some PDML fags behind you, livestreamed from your Pentax of of course! -- Cheers Cotty -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss

Re: LINK TO ARCHIVES

I am working on a State of The List message for everyone, in which, once I understand it myself, I will attempt to explain how the new interface works. In the meantime, you can access the archives via the following link: https://pdml.net/empathy/list/pdml.pdml.net Have fun, Doug On 2/11/21

Re: LINK TO ARCHIVES

quot;link" at the bottom changed to > > %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > on 7th Feb. The old link also gives error 404 > > Alan C > > On 11-Feb-21 11:10 PM, Brian W wrote: > >> On 12 February 2021 at 04:36 Alan C wrote: > >> > >

Re: LINK TO ARCHIVES

1 at 04:36 Alan C wrote: What happened to the link to thePDML archives? The pipermail one is giving a 404 error - not sure why (http://pdml.net/pipermail/pdml_pdml.net/) This one still works: https://www.mail-archive.com/pdml@pdml.net/ as does the one Mike linked to (which I hadn't seen before

Re: LINK TO ARCHIVES

This? https://pdml.net/empathy/list/pdml.pdml.net > On 11 February 2021 at 17:36 Alan C wrote: > > > What happened to the link to thePDML archives? > > Alan C -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE fro

Re: LINK TO ARCHIVES

> On 12 February 2021 at 04:36 Alan C wrote: > > > What happened to the link to thePDML archives? The pipermail one is giving a 404 error - not sure why (http://pdml.net/pipermail/pdml_pdml.net/) This one still works: https://www.mail-archive.com/pdml@pdml.net/ as does the one

LINK TO ARCHIVES

What happened to the link to thePDML archives? Alan C -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: From the archives

"Kincade zone" ... I'll have to remember that one. On 4/9/2018 15:07, P. J. Alling wrote: Mark, you should never use Kennyboy's real name in a post.  If it gets repeated three times he'll appear in a cloud of garishly colored smoke and use his CaNikon to steal your soul, and recolor all you

Re: From the archives

On 4/8/2018 16:52, Bob W-PDML wrote: [1] think of the opportunities there will be for imaginative hair artistes! It's not enough I have that image stuck in my head now? I'm supposed to think about it too? -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we

Re: From the archives

On 4/8/2018 4:56 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote: On 8 Apr 2018, at 21:48, Larry Colen wrote: Bob W-PDML wrote: On 8 Apr 2018, at 19:29, Mark Roberts wrote: I've found it a real pleasure to go back and read the words of past members from as long as 15

Re: From the archives

Mark, you should never use Kennyboy's real name in a post.  If it gets repeated three times he'll appear in a cloud of garishly colored smoke and use his CaNikon to steal your soul, and recolor all you images causing them to be absorbed into the Kincade zone, never to be seen by anyone with

Re: From the archives

On 4/8/2018 3:57 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Bob W-PDML wrote: I've found it a real pleasure to go back and read the words of past members from as long as 15 years ago. Some great memories there and, yes, a lot of condensed truth. I think it'll be really appreciated by everyone. We are also a

Re: From the archives

Bob W-PDML wrote: Den 07.04.2018 21:24, skrev Mark Roberts: "If the answer involves Ken Rockwell, you're asking the wrong question." - Doug Franklin Well condensed truth. Context: I'm working on the 2018 PRML Book and Im doing the annual Quotations List as a compendium of the all-time

Re: From the archives

On 8 Apr 2018, at 21:48, Larry Colen wrote: > > > > Bob W-PDML wrote: >>> On 8 Apr 2018, at 19:29, Mark Roberts wrote: >>> > >>> >>> I've found it a real pleasure to go back and read the words of past >>> members from as long as 15 years ago.

Re: From the archives

>>> Den 07.04.2018 21:24, skrev Mark Roberts: > "If the answer involves Ken Rockwell, you're asking the wrong > question." > - Doug Franklin > Well condensed truth. >>> >>> Context: I'm working on the 2018 PRML Book and Im doing the annual >>> Quotations List as a

Re: From the archives

Bob W-PDML wrote: On 8 Apr 2018, at 19:29, Mark Roberts wrote: I've found it a real pleasure to go back and read the words of past members from as long as 15 years ago. Some great memories there and, yes, a lot of condensed truth. I think it'll be really

Re: From the archives

On 8/4/18, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed: >I'm working on the 2018 PRML Book Pentax Reprobates Mailing List -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__UK Shoot / Edit and || (O) |Live Broadcast News -- _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: From the archives

Bob W-PDML wrote: >> On 8 Apr 2018, at 19:29, Mark Roberts wrote: >> >> Jostein wrote: >> >>> Den 07.04.2018 21:24, skrev Mark Roberts: "If the answer involves Ken Rockwell, you're asking the wrong question." - Doug Franklin >>> Well condensed

Re: From the archives

> On 8 Apr 2018, at 19:29, Mark Roberts wrote: > > Jostein wrote: > >> Den 07.04.2018 21:24, skrev Mark Roberts: >>> "If the answer involves Ken Rockwell, you're asking the wrong >>> question." >>> - Doug Franklin >>> >> Well condensed truth. > > Context: I'm

Re: From the archives

Jostein wrote: >Den 07.04.2018 21:24, skrev Mark Roberts: >> "If the answer involves Ken Rockwell, you're asking the wrong >> question." >> - Doug Franklin >> > Well condensed truth. Context: I'm working on the 2018 PRML Book and Im doing the annual Quotations List as a compendium of the

Re: From the archives

Well condensed truth. Jostein Den 07.04.2018 21:24, skrev Mark Roberts: "If the answer involves Ken Rockwell, you're asking the wrong question." - Doug Franklin -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,

From the archives

"If the answer involves Ken Rockwell, you're asking the wrong question." - Doug Franklin -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit

RE: PESO - from the archives

. John in Brisbane -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bob W-PDML Sent: Friday, 20 May 2016 17:31 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> Subject: Re: PESO - from the archives That looks very good. Is it scanned from the neg? B >

Re: PESO - from the archives

Oh, you've been looking at my portfolio have you? On 5/20/16 12:42 PM, pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote: Message: 14 Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 13:41:13 -0400 From: Mark Roberts<postmas...@robertstech.com> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List<pdml@pdml.net> Subject: Re: PESO - from the archive

Re: PESO - from the archives

On 5/20/2016 12:52 PM, Ken Waller wrote: It is always reassuring to find out good photography didn't just start with the digital age Yeah but a lot of digital age photography just isn't good photography. Kenneth Waller That's not new with the "digital age" either. -- Science - Questions we

Re: PESO - from the archives

Doug Brewer wrote: >On 5/20/16 12:52 PM, Ken Waller wrote: >>> It is always reassuring to find out good photography didn't just start >>> with the digital age >> >> Yeah but alot of digital age photography just isn't good photography. >> >It was the same with film photography. Bad photos are bad

Re: PESO - from the archives

DiGiorgi" <godd...@me.com> Subject: Re: PESO - from the archives Why on earth do you want to start yet another nauseating "film vs digital" thread? Aren't we done with that stupid topic by now? Sheesh. Just when I was enjoying new adventures in instant film photography...

Re: PESO - from the archives

Excellent picture and scan. On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Doug Brewer wrote: > It was the same with film photography. Bad photos are bad photos, regardless > of format. > > On 5/20/16 12:52 PM, Ken Waller wrote: >>> >>> It is always reassuring to find out good

Re: PESO - from the archives

It was the same with film photography. Bad photos are bad photos, regardless of format. On 5/20/16 12:52 PM, Ken Waller wrote: It is always reassuring to find out good photography didn't just start with the digital age Yeah but alot of digital age photography just isn't good photography.

Re: PESO - from the archives

Why on earth do you want to start yet another nauseating "film vs digital" thread? Aren't we done with that stupid topic by now? Sheesh. Just when I was enjoying new adventures in instant film photography... :-/ G On May 20, 2016, at 9:52 AM, Ken Waller wrote: >> It is

Re: PESO - from the archives

; <shark50...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: PESO - from the archives It is always reassuring to find out good photography didn't just start with the digital age. On 5/20/16 7:17 AM, pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote: Message: 8 Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 17:22:41 +1000 From: "John Coyle"<jco.

Re: PESO - from the archives

Lovely, John! It’s a beauty! Cheers, Christine > On May 20, 2016, at 2:22 AM, John Coyle wrote: > > I've come to the conclusion that I will not have an opportunity to do much > wet processing of older > photos, particularly given the size of the archive, which goes back

Re: PESO - from the archives

rom: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John Coyle > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 2:23 AM > To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' <pdml@pdml.net> > Subject: PESO - from the archives > > I've come to the conclusion that I will not have an opportunity to do much >

RE: PESO - from the archives

John Coyle wrote: > I've come to the conclusion that I will not have an opportunity to do > much wet processing of older photos, particularly given the size of the > archive, which goes back 49 years! So, now I am scanning only those > worth preserving and probably leaving to my son, as they

Re: PESO - from the archives

That looks very good. Is it scanned from the neg? B > On 20 May 2016, at 08:24, John Coyle wrote: > > I've come to the conclusion that I will not have an opportunity to do much > wet processing of older > photos, particularly given the size of the archive, which goes back

PESO - from the archives

I've come to the conclusion that I will not have an opportunity to do much wet processing of older photos, particularly given the size of the archive, which goes back 49 years! So, now I am scanning only those worth preserving and probably leaving to my son, as they will be the main family

Pre-2006 PDML archives?

Anyone know if there are any pre-2006 PDML archives floating around out there on the web? I was wondering how long it's been since I first joined, but the current archives only go back to 2006, and I know I was a member long before that. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http

Re: Pre-2006 PDML archives?

I know of only two archives that collect the PDML www.mail-archive.com and the one that Doug maintains at PDML.net, the former goes back to sometime in 1999, I think. Which may be when Doug took over from Pentax in maintaining the list. I think there may have been another third party mail

Re: Pre-2006 PDML archives?

Quoting John Celio neo.venator.com+p...@gmail.com: Anyone know if there are any pre-2006 PDML archives floating around out there on the web? I was wondering how long it's been since I first joined, but the current archives only go back to 2006, and I know I was a member long before

Re: Pre-2006 PDML archives?

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 8:52 PM, pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote: Anyone know if there are any pre-2006 PDML archives floating around out there on the web? I was wondering how long it's been since I first joined, but the current archives only go back to 2006, and I know I was a member long before

Re: The Price of History Re: Archives only go back to April?

2011/8/9 Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com: On 8/8/11 10:53 AM, Rick Womer wrote: Doug, Once upon a time, not so very long ago, I reccall there being two PDML archives, one of which went back into the 1990s.  Is the farther-back one now defunct? Rick Sorry I missed this, Rick. The mail

RE: The Price of History Re: Archives only go back to April?

From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tim Øsleby I think I've just donated some money. I say think because I'm not very used to PayPall. I was not asked for password or any other verification. I find this a bit odd, but for all I know it may be perfectly

Re: The Price of History Re: Archives only go back to April?

Someone has hacked your pdml account Bob. -- MaritimTim My private photo blog: http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/ My photo class blog: http://z-fotokurs.blogspot.com/ To err is human to arr is pirate

Re: OFFLIST: Re: The Price of History Re: Archives only go back to April?

/8/11 10:53 AM, Rick Womer wrote: Doug, Once upon a time, not so very long ago, I reccall there being two PDML archives, one of which went back into the 1990s.  Is the farther-back one now defunct? Rick Sorry I missed this, Rick. The mail-archive.com archive dates back to when I took

OFFLIST: Re: The Price of History Re: Archives only go back to April?

Yea will send some Paypal On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com wrote: On 8/8/11 10:53 AM, Rick Womer wrote: Doug, Once upon a time, not so very long ago, I reccall there being two PDML archives, one of which went back into the 1990s.  Is the farther-back one now

Re: The Price of History Re: Archives only go back to April?

Keeping the archives is a useful thing. Let us know how to contribute to the cost. -- Godfrey   godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above

Re: OFFLIST: Re: The Price of History Re: Archives only go back to April?

: On 8/8/11 10:53 AM, Rick Womer wrote: Doug, Once upon a time, not so very long ago, I reccall there being two PDML archives, one of which went back into the 1990s.  Is the farther-back one now defunct? Rick Sorry I missed this, Rick. The mail-archive.com archive dates back to when I took

Re: OFFLIST: Re: The Price of History Re: Archives only go back to April?

wrote: Yea will send some Paypal On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Doug Brewerd...@alphoto.com wrote: On 8/8/11 10:53 AM, Rick Womer wrote: Doug, Once upon a time, not so very long ago, I reccall there being two PDML archives, one of which went back into the 1990s. Is the farther-back one

Re: OFFLIST: Re: The Price of History Re: Archives only go back to April?

 wrote: On 8/8/11 10:53 AM, Rick Womer wrote: Doug, Once upon a time, not so very long ago, I reccall there being two PDML archives, one of which went back into the 1990s.  Is the farther-back one now defunct? Rick Sorry I missed this, Rick. The mail-archive.com archive dates back to when

Re: OFFLIST: Re: The Price of History Re: Archives only go back to April?

wrote: On 8/8/11 10:53 AM, Rick Womer wrote: Doug, Once upon a time, not so very long ago, I reccall there being two PDML archives, one of which went back into the 1990s. Is the farther-back one now defunct? Rick Sorry I missed this, Rick. The mail-archive.com archive dates back to when I

Re: OFFLIST: Re: The Price of History Re: Archives only go back to April?

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Paul Sorenson pentax1...@gmail.com wrote: http://pdml.net/ Donation button at bottom of the page Thanks. Donation sent. It's probably a good idea to send a reminder every year ... I don't think a $5-10 donation from some percentage of the PDML subscriber base

Re: OFFLIST: Re: The Price of History Re: Archives only go back to April?

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote: Nice hat. ;-) Thanks Dave -- Godfrey   godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit

The Price of History Re: Archives only go back to April?

On 8/8/11 10:53 AM, Rick Womer wrote: Doug, Once upon a time, not so very long ago, I reccall there being two PDML archives, one of which went back into the 1990s. Is the farther-back one now defunct? Rick Sorry I missed this, Rick. The mail-archive.com archive dates back to when I took

Re: The Price of History Re: Archives only go back to April?

My vote is Yea. My wife is a historian. She's finishing a book for which she spent many, many hours poking around in German archives, going through personal papers and court records from the 15th and 16th centuries. I have a soft spot for keeping things. Should we use the doug

Re: The Price of History Re: Archives only go back to April?

On 8/9/11 4:13 PM, Rick Womer wrote: My vote is Yea. noted. My wife is a historian. She's finishing a book for which she spent many, many hours poking around in German archives, going through personal papers and court records from the 15th and 16th centuries. I have a soft spot

Re: The Price of History Re: Archives only go back to April?

Sure thing. Remind how we send money. On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com wrote: On 8/8/11 10:53 AM, Rick Womer wrote: Doug, Once upon a time, not so very long ago, I reccall there being two PDML archives, one of which went back into the 1990s.  Is the farther-back

Re: The Price of History Re: Archives only go back to April?

two PDML archives, one of which went back into the 1990s. Is the farther-back one now defunct? Rick Sorry I missed this, Rick. The mail-archive.com archive dates back to when I took over the list, during the Winter of 2000-2001. When we moved to the current host, in 2006, I didn't carry over

Re: The Price of History Re: Archives only go back to April?

AM, Rick Womer wrote: Doug, Once upon a time, not so very long ago, I reccall there being two PDML archives, one of which went back into the 1990s.  Is the farther-back one now defunct? Rick Sorry I missed this, Rick. The mail-archive.com archive dates back to when I took over the list

Re: The Price of History Re: Archives only go back to April?

I vote keep the archives. I'll send money to PDML come payday! Cheers, Christine On Aug 9, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Doug Brewer wrote: On 8/8/11 10:53 AM, Rick Womer wrote: Doug, Once upon a time, not so very long ago, I reccall there being two PDML archives, one of which went back

Re: Archives only go back to April?

Doug, Once upon a time, not so very long ago, I reccall there being two PDML archives, one of which went back into the 1990s. Is the farther-back one now defunct? Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW --- On Thu, 8/4/11, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com wrote: From: Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com

Re: Archives only go back to April?

reccall there being two PDML archives, one of which went back into the 1990s. Is the farther-back one now defunct? Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW --- On Thu, 8/4/11, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com wrote: From: Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com Subject: Re: Archives only go back to April

Re: Archives only go back to April?

On 8/1/11 1:02 AM, Tim Bray wrote: I was going to make a witty comment online about something that someone said in March, but apparently PDML time began on April 1, 2011. I've never had occasion to visit the archives before; have they always been just a short moving window? -T Thanks

Re: Archives only go back to April?

.  I've never had occasion to visit the archives before; have they always been just a short moving window? -T Thanks for the heads up. The PDML.net archives are now restored to May 2006, when we moved to the current home. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net

Archives only go back to April?

I was going to make a witty comment online about something that someone said in March, but apparently PDML time began on April 1, 2011. I've never had occasion to visit the archives before; have they always been just a short moving window? -T -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http

Re: Archives only go back to April?

to make a witty comment online about something that someone said in March, but apparently PDML time began on April 1, 2011. I've never had occasion to visit the archives before; have they always been just a short moving window? -T -- Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering

Re: Archives only go back to April?

There was a server crash in April and the archives were truncated at that time - but you can still get earlier ones here: http://www.mail-archive.com/pdml@pdml.net/ Cheers Brian On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:02 -0700, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote: I was going to make a witty comment online

Where is the PDML Archives?

I read the archives to keep up. The server has been down all day? Walt -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: Where is the PDML Archives?

Yes, this is what I am observing over here. No PDML traffic between this morning and up until very recently. All times are local (Jerusalem). On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 1:58 AM, Walter Hamlerhamlerwal...@gmail.com wrote: I read the archives to keep up. The server has been down all day? Walt

Re: Where is the PDML Archives?

Yay! Archives are back on-line. I just logged on 15 mins ago then had to check my e-mail account to see if the archives had caught up yet. Not quite there. -Pat On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Walter Hamlerhamlerwal...@gmail.com wrote: I read the archives to keep up. The server has been

Re: PESO x2 - From My Archives

2008 7:39 PM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: PESO x2 - From My Archives Very nice. That 24-35mm lens is a little gem. I still have one for my MX. Bob -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML

RE: PESO x2 - From My Archives

- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of P. J. Alling Sent: Thursday, 4 December 2008 3:12 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO x2 - From My Archives You can always borrow a FF Canon an adapter and do a bit of surgery on the lens. It would only be a little

Re: PESO x2 - From My Archives

01, 2008 12:26 AM Subject: PESO x2 - From My Archives I sent the following almost a day ago and it hasn't shown up in my inbox yet. I'll send it again and hope for a better result. - Loggers

Re: PESO x2 - From My Archives

In a message dated 11/30/2008 4:46:55 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Really like the second. Nice recording of a historical moment. Marnie aka Doe :-) Loggers and preservationists faced off in the mountains near Eden, New South Wales, in 1989. Police

Re: PESO x2 - From My Archives

On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Anthony Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Loggers and preservationists faced off in the mountains near Eden, New South Wales, in 1989. Police presence kept tempers in check. It was a running campaign of protests and counter protests, with the loggers blockading

RE: PESO x2 - From My Archives

- From My Archives Interesting subject, Anthony. I like the stiff, jutting jaw of the blonde police officer--very stern looking there. Enjoyed seeing these. Cheers, Christine - Original Message - From: Anthony Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent

RE: PESO x2 - From My Archives

PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 3 December 2008 5:35 AM To: pdml@pdml.net Subject: Re: PESO x2 - From My Archives In a message dated 11/30/2008 4:46:55 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Really like the second. Nice recording of a historical moment. Marnie aka Doe

RE: PESO x2 - From My Archives

Showdown is almost too colourful. The bright colours lend a somewhat festive air to a very serious situation. I wonder how it would work in BW? Frank, thanks for the comments. Actually, the atmosphere at this protest did turn out to be one of friendly rivalry and a bit of a picnic, even

Re: PESO x2 - From My Archives

- Original Message - From: Anthony Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] You're right about cops, they are pretty much the same around the world. It's the size of their firearm that sets the volume control of their machismo. Italian Carabinieri and their Indonesian equivalents prowling airports and

RE: PESO x2 - From My Archives

- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christine Aguila Sent: Wednesday, 3 December 2008 4:14 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO x2 - From My Archives (old stuff snipped) I was once acquainted with an American lady police officer, who told some very

Re: PESO x2 - From My Archives

Hi Anthony Good documentary shots of that time. That far south coast of NSW is probably my favourite destination when I need a break. Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/ On Mon, 1 Dec 2008

RE: PESO x2 - From My Archives

Very nice. That 24-35mm lens is a little gem. I still have one for my MX. Bob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Farr Sent: 01 December 2008 06:26 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: PESO x2 - From My Archives I sent

RE: PESO x2 - From My Archives

As for the message not showing up in your inbox, that's just the way Gmail works. Messages you send won't show up in your inbox until someone replies. (Cotty, bite your tongue) It's difficult Put your teeth back in then. Bob -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

  1   2   >