As far as I know, if you refuse the cancer scan, you can't opt for the
groping. It's an arbitrarily random decision. If you refuse the
scan, they won't let you through.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:39 AM, David Mann wrote:
> Australia's doing it too :( Mandatory porn-scan in the cancer machine an
From: "knarftheria...@gmail.com"
I expected your Utube offering to be something like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqLuIXwsLDw&feature=youtube_gdata_player
No, Mark doesn't talk like that but Newfies do.
I just remembered the line about "a very pronounced accent" and that was
the
hristopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: John Sessoms
Sent: February 21, 2012 2/21/12
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Canadian photographer denied entry to USA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aObBk_FdzCA
From: "knarftheria...@gmail.com"
> With your funny accent they pro
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aObBk_FdzCA
From: "knarftheria...@gmail.com"
With your funny accent they probably figured you were from Cape
Breton, Newfoundland or some place like that.
cheers,
frank
I've run the Casino Niagara Marathon, which starts in Buffalo,
crosses the Peace Bridge int
ot;
Subject: Re: OT - Canadian photographer denied entry to USA
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Cotty wrote:
> On 21/2/12, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>I don't think they liked it when we were asked how we came to know of
>>this GFM photography weekend, "fr
J Brooks
Sent: February 21, 2012 2/21/12
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: Re: OT - Canadian photographer denied entry to USA
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 3:20 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: Cotty
>
>> On 19/2/12, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Cotty wrote:
> On 21/2/12, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>I don't think they liked it when we were asked how we came to know of
>>this GFM photography weekend, "from a guy on the internet", that was
>>the final straw and in the rooms we went.
>
>
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> Interesting post by David duChemin on his PixelatedImage blog.
>
> http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2012/02/deported/
>
> It seems that the US has finally understood the threat posed by those from
> the north
There's nothing dumber tha
On 21/2/12, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I don't think they liked it when we were asked how we came to know of
>this GFM photography weekend, "from a guy on the internet", that was
>the final straw and in the rooms we went.
It's a bloody good job you didn't happen to have a photo
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 3:20 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: Cotty
>
>> On 19/2/12, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>
>>> They kept asking for an address, and we kept telling them
>>> we don't know it,its mountain.
>>
>> Would you believe -
>>
>>
>> 2050 Blowing Rock Highway
>> Linvil
On 21/02/2012, at 5:39 PM, David Mann wrote:
> Australia's doing it too :( Mandatory porn-scan in the cancer machine
For very low values of "porn" - the output is a body shape, not an x-ray. See
http://www.smh.com.au/travel/travel-news/grated-scanners-for-travellers-20110326-1cavi.html
Paul
-
> >
> > He really seems to make the pompous ass persona work to good effect.
> Not
> > unlike several members of the PDML.
> >
> >
> >
> Stop talking about Bob W that way. He's British, and he can't help how
> he is.
>
> --
>
> William Robb
>
Mind your manners, colonial.
Hon. Bob W. OM, KCMG
On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:38 AM, William Robb wrote:
> That was 1981. The paranoia that has taken over the USA has been enforced on
> Canada Customs because if we don't conform with their rules, they make
> travelling to their country as unpleasant as possible.
Australia's doing it too :( Mandator
20, 2012 2/20/12
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: Re: Canadian photographer denied entry to USA
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
>I believe you, Steve. In the mid-seventies a friend and I were bored one
>Sunday afternoon so we decided to hitch-hike to Niagara Falls and
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
>I believe you, Steve. In the mid-seventies a friend and I were bored one
>Sunday afternoon so we decided to hitch-hike to Niagara Falls and spend a few
>hours on the American side just for the hell of it.
>
>The border guard was incredulous, could not understand
harley
Sent: February 20, 2012 2/20/12
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: Re: Canadian photographer denied entry to USA
on 2012-02-19 07:33 Bipin Gupta wrote
> Most of us have missed the point. Our Canadian friend said he had no
> permanent address in Canada. And no coun
liam Shatner back?
>>>
>>>
>>> From: "John Mullan"
>>>
>>>> Canada takes a very dim view of Americans coming into the country and
>>>> doing
>>>> any work. They may have been determining if what you were there for was
&g
On 20/02/2012 6:40 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
He really seems to make the pompous ass persona work to good effect. Not
unlike several members of the PDML.
Stop talking about Bob W that way. He's British, and he can't help how
he is.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml
On 2/20/2012 1:41 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Shatner has become very entertaining in his later years. He has
developed a genuine sense of humor about himself and his public image.
He really seems to make the pompous ass persona work to good effect. Not
unlike several members of the PDML.
t; From: Stan Halpin
>>>> Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2012 8:12 PM
>>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> Subject: Re: OT - Canadian photographer denied entry to USA
>>>>
>>>> As Paul said, it works both ways. In the mid-to-late '90
From: William Robb
On 20/02/2012 12:36 PM, steve harley wrote:
on 2012-02-19 07:33 Bipin Gupta wrote
Most of us have missed the point. Our Canadian friend said he had no
permanent address in Canada. And no country will allow you in in this
situation.
perhaps that's true now, but in my 1981 c
gt;> "work".
>>
>>> From: Stan Halpin
>>> Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2012 8:12 PM
>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> Subject: Re: OT - Canadian photographer denied entry to USA
>>>
>>> As Paul said, it works both ways. In the mid
Halpin
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2012 8:12 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT - Canadian photographer denied entry to USA
As Paul said, it works both ways. In the mid-to-late '90's I was a co-chair
of a NATO research committee. We put together a Workshop (the presentations
from
You don't really have to be that old. The passport requirement only took
effect in June 2009.
Prior to that, as of Jan 31, 2008 "documents denoting citizenship and
identity", e.g. Birth Certificate & Driver's License, were required,
although I think that by 2008 all states had changed over to
nces either.
Cheers, frank
"What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without
proof." -- Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Brian Walters Sent: February 18,
2012 2/18/12 To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Subject:
OT - Canadian photographer denied entry to USA
From: Cotty
On 19/2/12, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
They kept asking for an address, and we kept telling them
we don't know it,its mountain.
Would you believe -
2050 Blowing Rock Highway
Linville, NC 28646
True!!!
Also:
Grandfather Mountain State Park
P.O. Box 129
US 221
on 2012-02-20 11:38 William Robb wrote
On 20/02/2012 12:36 PM, steve harley wrote:
on 2012-02-19 07:33 Bipin Gupta wrote
Most of us have missed the point. Our Canadian friend said he had no
permanent address in Canada. And no country will allow you in in this
situation.
perhaps that's true no
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:36 AM, steve harley wrote:
> perhaps that's true now, but in my 1981 case, i was admitted to Canada
> from the US with no proof of permanent address
Well, I guess we learned our lesson. -T
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listin
On 20/02/2012 12:36 PM, steve harley wrote:
on 2012-02-19 07:33 Bipin Gupta wrote
Most of us have missed the point. Our Canadian friend said he had no
permanent address in Canada. And no country will allow you in in this
situation.
perhaps that's true now, but in my 1981 case, i was admitted t
on 2012-02-19 07:33 Bipin Gupta wrote
Most of us have missed the point. Our Canadian friend said he had no
permanent address in Canada. And no country will allow you in in this
situation.
perhaps that's true now, but in my 1981 case, i was admitted to Canada from the
US with no proof of perman
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Stan Halpin
wrote:
> In at least some U.S. states you can now get an "enhanced" drivers license
> which you can use in lieu of a passport for crossings to/from Canada, Mexico,
> and IIRC some portions of the Caribbean. I've tried it, it works. Maybe they
> have
ct: Re: OT - Canadian photographer denied entry to USA
As Paul said, it works both ways. In the mid-to-late '90's I was a co-chair
of a NATO research committee. We put together a Workshop (the presentations
from which eventually became a book; and thus is world peace achieved). My
Canadi
: Brian Walters
Sent: February 18, 2012 2/18/12
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: OT - Canadian photographer denied entry to USA
Interesting post by David duChemin on his PixelatedImage blog.
http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2012/02/deported/
It seems
missed without proof." --
> Christopher Hitchens
>
> --- Original Message ---
>
> From: Brian Walters
> Sent: February 18, 2012 2/18/12
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: OT - Canadian photographer denied entry to USA
>
> Interesting post by David
As Paul said, it works both ways. In the mid-to-late '90's I was a co-chair of
a NATO research committee. We put together a Workshop (the presentations from
which eventually became a book; and thus is world peace achieved). My Canadian
colleagues in the group organized and hosted the workshop at
chances either.
Cheers,
frank
"What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof."
-- Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Brian Walters
Sent: February 18, 2012 2/18/12
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: OT - Canadian photographer denied entry t
n be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof."
-- Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Brian Walters
Sent: February 18, 2012 2/18/12
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: OT - Canadian photographer denied entry to USA
Interesting post by David duChe
acs" )
This guy just had a bad draw is all.
Having no fixed address didn't help his chances either.
Cheers,
frank
"What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Brian Walters
Sent: February 18, 2
.
Having no fixed address didn't help his chances either.
Cheers,
frank
"What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Brian Walters
Sent: February 18, 2012 2/18/12
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
of the US. Taken as a totality it seems particularly stupid
> that a Canadian trying to enter legally should be denied entry.
>
the US authorities are acting on behalf of their southern neighbours to
control the 'freedom train' from Toronto to Tijuana. Why do you think Frank
has to d
>
> " Both countries should apply to join the EU. That would solve your
> problems,
> and we'd have Russia surrounded."
>
> But most of the countries in the EU seem to want out now.
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
Not at all!! They like it so much they want t
y stupid
that a Canadian trying to enter legally should be denied entry.
On 2/19/2012 9:33 AM, Bipin Gupta wrote:
Most of us have missed the point. Our Canadian friend said he had no
permanent address in Canada. And no country will allow you in in this
situation.
Every country has a minimum requir
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Bob W wrote:
" Both countries should apply to join the EU. That would solve your problems,
and we'd have Russia surrounded."
But most of the countries in the EU seem to want out now.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Feb 1
From: "P. J. Alling"
I think this says it in a nutshell, (I'll paraphrase since I didn't
bother to copy and past). " you wouldn't want a Canadian stealing an
American job from a Mexican..." I swear to God, I'll never understand
my own government, when I think I understand the stupid, they prove
On 19/2/12, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>They kept asking for an address, and we kept telling them
>we don't know it,its mountain.
Would you believe -
2050 Blowing Rock Highway
Linville, NC 28646
True!!!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
--
>
> I once played big bird at a kids xmas party, so there ya go.:-)
>
> When Frank and I drove to GFM in 2005, it took several hours to get
> into the US of A. Both of us interrogated individually for story
> correctness. They kept asking for an address, and we kept telling them
> we don't know i
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> I meant "he" but it could have been a chicken.
I once played big bird at a kids xmas party, so there ya go.:-)
When Frank and I drove to GFM in 2005, it took several hours to get
into the US of A. Both of us interrogated individually fo
Most of us have missed the point. Our Canadian friend said he had no
permanent address in Canada. And no country will allow you in in this
situation.
Every country has a minimum requirement to be let in on arrival at an
airport or pre apply for a Visa.
I am from Bangalore, India, and have never had
I meant "he" but it could have been a chicken.
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> Maybe hen thought you were cute, Dave.
>
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:15 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Mark Roberts
>> wrote:
>>> Brian Walters wrote:
>>>
>>
Maybe hen thought you were cute, Dave.
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:15 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Mark Roberts
> wrote:
>> Brian Walters wrote:
>>
>>>Interesting post by David duChemin on his PixelatedImage blog.
>>>
>>>http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2012/02/de
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> Brian Walters wrote:
>
>>Interesting post by David duChemin on his PixelatedImage blog.
>>
>>http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2012/02/deported/
>>
>>It seems that the US has finally understood the threat posed by those
>>from the north
>
It does work both ways. Both countries are protective of their job base. When I
worked for Young & Rubicam and again when working for BBDO, I sometimes
collaborated with Toronto offices on creative projects. I often had trouble
crossing the border in Windsor. I had to say I was going to the Toro
Brian Walters wrote:
>Interesting post by David duChemin on his PixelatedImage blog.
>
>http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2012/02/deported/
>
>It seems that the US has finally understood the threat posed by those
>from the north
They understood it years ago -- ask Frank about his first tri
on 2012-02-18 14:36 P. J. Alling wrote
I think this says it in a nutshell, (I'll paraphrase since I didn't bother to
copy and past). " you wouldn't want a Canadian stealing an American job from a
Mexican..."
i believe it works both ways — i had a memorable experience receiving a similar
sentim
On 18/02/2012 5:00 PM, David Parsons wrote:
He stated why they didn't let him in. He didn't have a fixed address.
We've been playing the part of a fixed address for a friend for a few
years. It isn't so bad.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/ma
He stated why they didn't let him in. He didn't have a fixed address.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:36 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> I think this says it in a nutshell, (I'll paraphrase since I didn't bother
> to copy and past). " you wouldn't want a Canadian stealing an American job
> from a Mexican..
I think this says it in a nutshell, (I'll paraphrase since I didn't
bother to copy and past). " you wouldn't want a Canadian stealing an
American job from a Mexican..."
I swear to God, I'll never understand my own government, when I think I
understand the stupid, they prove me wrong.
On 2/1
Interesting post by David duChemin on his PixelatedImage blog.
http://www.pixelatedimage.com/blog/2012/02/deported/
It seems that the US has finally understood the threat posed by those
from the north
--
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Aus
Thanks Bong.
My seventieth pic accepted was also my first into the Premier
Collection, so it very much felt like an anniversary. :-)
Jostein
2007/12/5, Bong Manayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thank you, Jostein...and to Jack as well.
>
> I've been intermittent in submitting photos; there was a spell
Jack,
The (Atlantic) puffins were shot in a nature reserve on the Norwegian
West coast called Runde. You can read more about the island in English
at Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runde
The pic was taken in the good company of Tim Øsleby and some
non-pentaxian Norwegian nature photograp
Same here.
That's why I think it's a bug. I'm sure Pentax would like the info to
be right when linking to images that way too.
Jostein
2007/12/5, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I had the same experience. No idea why..even if it mattered. ;)
> --- Bong Manayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > No
Jostein,
Glad this thread happened. It made me aware of your exceptional work.
I just 'quickly' scanned some more of your Pentax Gallery shots and
come across the Puffins. I've hankered to get into an area where I
might get a shot at them, but thus far haven't.
If you wouldn't mind, when you have
Jostein and others:
Thanks for posting these amazing photos. awesome.
In comparison my rejects http://www.repiuk.nl/peso now look like snapshots :)
On Dec 4, 2007 11:10 PM, AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/12/3, Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I would like to see photos which are accepte
I had the same experience. No idea why..even if it mattered. ;)
--- Bong Manayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No wait...when I accessed your photos through the links you posted, I
> got the "undefined" when I looked again, this time selecting your
> name
> off the menu, it reflected your name prop
No wait...when I accessed your photos through the links you posted, I
got the "undefined" when I looked again, this time selecting your name
off the menu, it reflected your name properly both in the watermark
and the tag below the photo.
Bong
On Dec 5, 2007 11:13 PM, AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Think I will.
Must be a bug.
Jostein
2007/12/5, Bong Manayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Uh...yeah. In fact why is the copyright watermark and the name
> underneath "Undefined Undefined"? Perhaps you should point that out
> to Carolyn...
>
> Bong
>
> On Dec 5, 2007 10:40 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Uh...yeah. In fact why is the copyright watermark and the name
underneath "Undefined Undefined"? Perhaps you should point that out
to Carolyn...
Bong
On Dec 5, 2007 10:40 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jostein,
> While I've looked at most members gallery pages at one time or another, I ha
Thank you, Jostein...and to Jack as well.
I've been intermittent in submitting photos; there was a spell of 3
months where I did not submit or even bothered to look at the gallery.
I'm pleasantly surprised that you now have something like over 70
photos accepted...congratulations!
Bong
On Dec 5
Hi Jostein,
While I've looked at most members gallery pages at one time or another, I had
missed yours. Probably because they decided you come at the end of the
alphabet. Glad I saw it today. Some great work. Beautiful stuff.
Congratulations.
Paul
-- Original message ---
Thanks, Jostein!
Terrific shots, yourself. Congratulations on your success in gallery
acceptance.
Jack
--- AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lovely shots, Jack.
> Jostein
>
> 2007/12/5, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The following three have been accepted in the last couple months,
> t
I noticed the Bath shot in your blog, and I remember voting for both of them...
I've had some surprises too, both admissions and rejects. For positive
surprises, it could be a good idea to submit pics one have a
half-hearted liking for. Mileages vary; and not to mention taste...
:-)
Jostein
2007
rusty cars and old stuff seems to be in high favour at the Gallery...
There's been a lot of them through the voting in the last month or so.
Good to see that yours got through the needle's eye. Nice shots.
Jostein
2007/12/5, Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Only a couple of acceptances in t
2007/12/5, ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jostein -- sure looking good there - lovely stuff
Thank you m'lady. :-)
Cheers,
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Lovely shots, Jack.
Jostein
2007/12/5, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The following three have been accepted in the last couple months, the
> last of which was sometime in the first half of Nov:
>
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=Artist&subSection=123195&subSection=297668&langua
Thanks Bob.
I see Brian has found a better way of linking to the photos. I will
take note of that.
Best,
Jostein
2007/12/4, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jostien,
> That is a wonderful collection of photos, really awesome photos.
> The links however, hoover.
> Each one reloads the Pentax s
Hey Bong,
Acceptance rate of 50%. That's pretty good, y'know. And worthy shots too.
My favourite of those three is the sapling coming out of the old stub.
Well seen and executed.
Jostein
2007/12/5, Bong Manayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I submitted about 6 in the last two months. Three got in...
>
Thanks Francis,
Brian already directed you to the way of joining. He's also right it
will be a pain on a dial-up.
Jostein
2007/12/5, Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Great work!
> Those are all amazing...
>
> So how do you enter this thing?
> I can't find a link (I'm on dial up so viewing these ho
Francis
Go to the main site:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/
Click on "Site Tools" and then "Contact Us". They will send you an "Artist's
Code" so you can log in and start uploading, but it may take a few days. It
will also be very painful on dial up. 8-(>
Cheers
Brian
In a message dated 12/4/2007 2:11:10 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jack? Mark Roberts? Anyone?
best,
Jostein
Simply beautiful photos, Jostein.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
-
Warning: I am now filtering my email, so yo
Great work!
Those are all amazing...
So how do you enter this thing?
I can't find a link (I'm on dial up so viewing these horrid flash sites
is painful at best and hunting around for something in particular is
positively maddening).
Francis
AlunFoto wrote:
> 2007/12/3, Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Good deserving work.
Jack
--- Bong Manayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submitted about 6 in the last two months. Three got in...
>
>
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=ARTIST&subSection=130838&subSubSection=1010344&language=EN
>
>
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=A
I didn't happen to have voted on these, but I agree.
Jack
--- Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Only a couple of acceptances in the past month or so. Here:
>
>
>
>
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artist/galleryimages/gallery_image_1058462.jpg
>
>
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.co
Much appreciated, Paul.
Thanks!
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And deservedly so.
> On Dec 4, 2007, at 6:39 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> > The following three have been accepted in the last couple months,
> the
> > last of which was sometime in the first half of Nov:
> >
> > h
I submitted about 6 in the last two months. Three got in...
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=ARTIST&subSection=130838&subSubSection=1010344&language=EN
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=ARTIST&subSection=130838&subSubSection=1065608&language=EN
http://www.pentaxphotog
Only a couple of acceptances in the past month or so. Here:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artist/galleryimages/gallery_image_1058462.jpg
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artist/galleryimages/gallery_image_758424.jpg
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Wester
And deservedly so.
On Dec 4, 2007, at 6:39 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> The following three have been accepted in the last couple months, the
> last of which was sometime in the first half of Nov:
>
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/
> home#section=Artist&subSection=123195&subSection=297668&language
>AlunFoto wrote:
>
>
>
>>2007/12/3, Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>
>>>I would like to see photos which are accepted in the last weeks/months.
>>>
>>>
>>It would have been great if the gallery had a "recent admissions"
>>
>>
>section.
>
Jostein -- sure looking good there - lovely
The following three have been accepted in the last couple months, the
last of which was sometime in the first half of Nov:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=Artist&subSection=123195&subSection=297668&language=EN
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=Artist&subSection=123195&
Bob Sullivan wrote:
>Jostien,
>That is a wonderful collection of photos, really awesome photos.
>The links however, hoover.
>Each one reloads the Pentax site, then 12 of your photos, then the
target photo.
Welcome to the world of Flash-driven web sites :(
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
Jostien,
That is a wonderful collection of photos, really awesome photos.
The links however, hoover.
Each one reloads the Pentax site, then 12 of your photos, then the target photo.
Regards, Bob S.
On Dec 4, 2007 4:10 PM, AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/12/3, Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
AlunFoto wrote:
>2007/12/3, Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I would like to see photos which are accepted in the last weeks/months.
>
>It would have been great if the gallery had a "recent admissions"
section.
>
I've submitted two in the past two months. The photo of the Royal
Crescent in Bath di
2007/12/3, Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I would like to see photos which are accepted in the last weeks/months.
It would have been great if the gallery had a "recent admissions" section.
Here are mine from November:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=ARTIST&subSection=230961&subSubSec
It might have been nice if it were more user friendly, and less
amateurishly coded.
Joseph Tainter wrote:
> "This is also a bit quirky."
>
> Jostein
>
> -
>
> You expected Pentax to do it how?
>
> Joe
>
>
--
The difference between individual intelligence and group intelligence is the
d
:-P
On Dec 4, 2007 1:30 PM, Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave's like that. 8-)>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artist
On Dec 4, 2007 11:30 AM, Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can any one let me in on the URL to this thing??
>
> F
>
> Brian Walters wrote:
> > Yes, because of the way the voting process now works it's quite possible
> >
Dave's like that. 8-)>
Try this:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/index-flash.jsp?
Cheers
Brian
who's just had 5 out of 6 declined. 8-(>
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
Quoting David Savage <[
Probably
Cheers,
Dave
At 12:30 PM 4/12/2007, Francis wrote:
>Can any one let me in on the URL to this thing??
>
>F
>
>Brian Walters wrote:
> > Yes, because of the way the voting process now works it's quite
> possible for a resubmiited image to be successful the second time around.
> >
> > It's
Can any one let me in on the URL to this thing??
F
Brian Walters wrote:
> Yes, because of the way the voting process now works it's quite possible for
> a resubmiited image to be successful the second time around.
>
> It's happened to Jack and it's happened to me and I'm sure to several others
in
> only
> 48 hrs. I advised Pentax who explained that there had been some
> "voting
> issues" and suggested I re-submit the image. I did so and it was
> ultimately accepted.
>
> Jack
> --- Toine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > After reading this th
After reading this thread I decided to drop in six photos. Everything
> is denied! Submitted on fridaynight and 3 declined sundaynight, the
> other 3 today. Weeks ago six others dropped in the recycle bin. I
> need
> a drink and another hobby :)
> Don't touch the "Edit info..
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
