Exposed!

An interesting-looking exhibition at Tate Modern this summer: -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and f

Exposed

worth an exhibition just on their own - amazing stuff. A couple of reviews: <http://www.foto8.com/new/online/blog/1204-exposed> <http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2010/may/27/exposed-photography-tate -modern> Bob -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/m

Re: Exposed!

Art? In the Tate Modern? Now, THAT would be remarkable, Dan On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Bob W wrote: > An interesting-looking exhibition at Tate Modern this summer: > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.

Re: Exposed

s are probably worth an exhibition just on their own - amazing stuff. A couple of reviews: <http://www.foto8.com/new/online/blog/1204-exposed> <http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2010/may/27/exposed-photography-tate -modern> Bob Mind boggled. What a broad theme for a s

The Coast Exposed

Hi, This afternoon I went to see the new exhibition at The Queen's House, which is part of the National Maritime Museum here in Greenwich. The exhibition is a joint effort looking at the British coastline, with photographs by The National Trust and some of the British members of Magnum. The NT l

PESO - Minerals exposed

http://alunfoto.blogspot.no/2013/11/minerals-exposed.html Jostein -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

PESO: History Exposed

A quick cellphone shot of some old tram tracks that have been exposed by road works. I think they should be put into service again. http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/644/#peso Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to

PESO - double-exposed poppy

Poppies are rare at home, so I made my best effort to shoot them in Denmark. Here's a slightly different take on 'em, an in-camera double exposure. http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3536/display/3456161 The in-focus part was shot according to the light meter, the out-of-focus one was 1 s

PESO - double-exposed poppy

Re: http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3536/display/3456161 Nice, Jostein. I like the effect. Joe

Does exposed film travel?

Hi folks, I am on holiday in Greece and have shot 2 Kodak T-MAX 400 (@800, if it makes any difference). I would like to develop them in my favourite lab (Ilfords in the UK) but I am worried about X-ray machines and metal-detector arches etc. Do you see any problem? Would you fly with them back t

Re: PESO - Minerals exposed

On 22/11/13, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne, discombobulated, unleashed: >http://alunfoto.blogspot.no/2013/11/minerals-exposed.html > >Jostein Really nice composition with interesting content - kept me looking. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production

Re: PESO - Minerals exposed

I agree. Another winner. Your tour of the western U.S. has been captivating. Well done. Paul On Nov 22, 2013, at 9:49 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote: > On 22/11/13, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> http://alunfoto.blogspot.no/2013/11/minerals-exposed.html >> >> Jostein >

Re: PESO - Minerals exposed

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne wrote: > http://alunfoto.blogspot.no/2013/11/minerals-exposed.html Very nice deep colors. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link

Re: PESO - Minerals exposed

Makes me wonder. "Minerals" nicely placed in the scene. Jack   - Original Message - From: Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Cc: Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 6:44 AM Subject: PESO - Minerals exposed http://alunfoto.blogspot.no/2013/11/minerals-ex

Re: PESO - Minerals exposed

Nice - and I remember that area well.. ann On 11/22/2013 09:44, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne wrote: http://alunfoto.blogspot.no/2013/11/minerals-exposed.html Jostein -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, pleas

Re: PESO - Minerals exposed

I like it. A very pleasant scene. You have done a great job on this little trip of yours. -- Bruce -- Sent from Sony Tablet S "Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne" wrote: >http://alunfoto.blogspot.no/2013/11/minerals-exposed.html > >Jostein -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pd

Re: PESO - Minerals exposed

Nice! You caught the colors of all those different minerals very nicely. G On Nov 22, 2013, at 6:44 AM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne wrote: > http://alunfoto.blogspot.no/2013/11/minerals-exposed.html > > Jostein -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/p

Re: PESO - Minerals exposed

That's very interesting - it could almost be piles of spices on a market stall in India or Morocco or somewhere. B > On 22 Nov 2013, at 14:44, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne wrote: > > http://alunfoto.blogspot.no/2013/11/minerals-exposed.html > > Jostein > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@

Re: PESO - Minerals exposed

Just FYI for the curious - The formation is called the "artist's drive" and represents relatively recent deposits in geologic time (Cenozoic) there is a view at ARches that is similar in texture and color but has a different formation name that begins with "C" I think. ann On 11/22/2013 14:3

Re: PESO - Minerals exposed

Quoting Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne : http://alunfoto.blogspot.no/2013/11/minerals-exposed.html Another top shot. I really like the contrasting colours and textures - the various shades of brown, not just the colourful minerals. -- Cheers Brian ++ Brian W

Re: PESO - Minerals exposed

You keep out-doing yourself. Gorgeous. Cheers, frank "Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne" wrote: >http://alunfoto.blogspot.no/2013/11/minerals-exposed.html > >Jostein “Analysis kills spontaneity.” -- Henri-Frederic Amiel -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinf

Re: PESO - Minerals exposed

Another stunning image, Jostein! Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne wrote: > http://alunfoto.blogspot.no/2013/11/minerals-exposed.html > > Jostein > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://

Re: PESO - Minerals exposed

t Subject: PESO - Minerals exposed http://alunfoto.blogspot.no/2013/11/minerals-exposed.html Jostein -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML

Re: PESO - Minerals exposed

At least you've confirmed that the subject colors are those of "minerals." ;=) Jack - Original Message - From: Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Cc: Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2013 6:40 AM Subject: Re: PESO - Minerals exposed Thanks for commenti

Re: PESO - double-exposed poppy

Hi! Poppies are rare at home, so I made my best effort to shoot them in Denmark. Here's a slightly different take on 'em, an in-camera double exposure. http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3536/display/3456161 The in-focus part was shot according to the light meter, the out-of-focus one w

Re: PESO - double-exposed poppy

This one just seems a bit too washed out looking to me - probably due to the over exposure part of the double. I'd like to see more examples of this technique as I have heard about doing double exposures to render backgrounds differently. -- Best regards, Bruce Sunday, July 3, 2005, 8:35:45 AM

Re: PESO - double-exposed poppy

Jostein wrote: Poppies are rare at home, so I made my best effort to shoot them in Denmark. Here's a slightly different take on 'em, an in-camera double exposure. http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3536/display/3456161 The in-focus part was shot according to the light meter, the out-of-

Re: PESO - double-exposed poppy

ot;Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jostein" Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 6:51 PM Subject: Re: PESO - double-exposed poppy This one just seems a bit too washed out looking to me - probably due to the over exposure part of the double. I'd like to see more example

Re: PESO - double-exposed poppy

than answers...:-) Cheers, Jostein (holding tight on his FA*400/5.6) - Original Message - From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 7:46 PM Subject: Re: PESO - double-exposed poppy Hi! Poppies are rare at home, so I made my best effo

Re: PESO - double-exposed poppy

Glad you liked it, Joe! Btw, Does anyone know if the multi-exposure thing with the *istD is unique in the DSLR world? Jostein - Original Message - From: "Joseph Tainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 6:29 PM Subject: PESO - double-exposed p

Re: PESO - double-exposed poppy

ra, and thus did nothing to the > background. > > Jostein > > - Original Message - > From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jostein" > Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2005 6:51 PM > Subject: Re: PESO - double-exposed poppy > > > &g

Re: PESO - double-exposed poppy

- Original Message - From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3536/display/3456161 How far out-of-focus? The previous examples of this that I have seen have had a definite impression of the oof part. Yours has just the faintest trace. Um... F

Re: PESO - double-exposed poppy

day, July 03, 2005 7:57 PM Subject: Re: PESO - double-exposed poppy Jostein, Duplicate the image - make a background copy in the layers palette. Change the blending mode to Multiply. The image will get perceptibly darker. Then use the opacity slider to adjust how dark you'd like the image -

Re: PESO - double-exposed poppy

Jostein wrote: - Original Message - From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3536/display/3456161 How far out-of-focus? The previous examples of this that I have seen have had a definite impression of the oof part. Yours has just the faintest

Re: Does exposed film travel?

> I am on holiday in Greece and have shot 2 Kodak T-MAX 400 (@800, if it > makes any difference). I would like to develop them in my favourite lab > (Ilfords in the UK) but I am worried about X-ray machines and > metal-detector arches etc. Metal detectors are harmless for film. Carry them in your

Re: Does exposed film travel?

Dont check them!! The X-ray machines used in the baggage handling area are *MUCH* more powerful, and will fog your film big time. Its better to go through the walk through. If you carry them separate, they usually will give you the courtesy of not passing them through the smaller X-ray machin

Re: Does exposed film travel?

Demand a hand check. I've never had a problem doing that. Put them in your pockets and the metal thingies are going to set off the detector anyway. Quoting John Dallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I am on holiday in Greece and have shot 2 Kodak T-MAX 400 (@800, if it > > makes any difference). I

Re: Does exposed film travel?

Hi Kostas, exposed film does travel just fine. You have to take some precautions though. First, never ~ I mean never put it in check-in luggage (great description :) ~ since Xray machines for that use much greater radiation dose and film gets easily damaged there, especially if it goes

Re: Does exposed film travel?

fly with them back to your origin? > Where would you put them, in the x-ray machine for hand-luggage, in > your pocket through the arch, or in the luggage you kiss goodbye > (perhaps forever) at the check-in desk? Or would you post them home? I always keep exposed film (and unexposed film

Re: Does exposed film travel?

John Dallman wrote: > > > I am on holiday in Greece and have shot 2 Kodak T-MAX 400 (@800, if it > > makes any difference). I would like to develop them in my favourite lab > > (Ilfords in the UK) but I am worried about X-ray machines and > > metal-detector arches etc. > > Metal detectors are h

Shutter problems? (partially-exposed frames)

I pulled out the camera on Saturday after a few days (ok, a week) of it sitting around unused and a couple of times when I went to use it the first images came out like this: http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/2008/shutter_probs/IMGP9186.jpg The camera is in "portrait" orientation rotate

Re: Shutter problems? (partially-exposed frames)

Forgot to open the door all the way.?? Dave On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Charles Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I pulled out the camera on Saturday after a few days (ok, a week) of > it sitting around unused and a couple of times when I went to use it > the first images came out like t

Re: Shutter problems? (partially-exposed frames)

Looks like your mirror got stuck in the down position, which put it out of sync with the shutter, (i.e. mirror started up after the shutter had already started to close). What might actually have caused that to happen, I couldn't tell you. Charles Robinson wrote: > I pulled out the camera on S

OT: Microsoft home-worker conditions exposed

>From http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=35199 "Apple's response was to blame Vole for not having a more robust operating system and that has Microsoft's anti-virus expert Jonathan Poon fuming. Writing in his bog, Poon said ..." I suppose it must be the fumes that have driven him

How do you keep track of exposed film?

The problem: I send my slide film out for processing (to The Slideprinter) about 5 rolls at a time. I number the rolls, and ask the lab to note the roll numbers on the slide boxes. Sometimes that happens, and sometimes not. Last year I came back from a trip with 15 exposed rolls, and the boxes

Re: How do you keep track of exposed film?

On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Rick Womer wrote: > S...how do others keep track of rolls through the > lab? Is there some way to quickly and indelibly mark > the leader? Don't know of a technological solution, but I would attempt to talk to the lab. Potentially strike a deal to mark the rolls with a re

Re: How do you keep track of exposed film?

from a trip with 15 exposed rolls, and the boxes came back with no numbers, which was a real pain. S...how do others keep track of rolls through the lab? Is there some way to quickly and indelibly mark the leader? No, there isn't. The best you can do is to sacrifice a frame to identific

Re: How do you keep track of exposed film?

Friday, April 08, 2005 5:53 PM Subject: How do you keep track of exposed film? The problem: I send my slide film out for processing (to The Slideprinter) about 5 rolls at a time. I number the rolls, and ask the lab to note the roll numbers on the slide boxes. Sometimes that happens, and some

Re: How do you keep track of exposed film?

imes not. Last year I came back from a trip > with 15 exposed rolls, and the boxes came back with no > numbers, which was a real pain. > S...how do others keep track of rolls through the > lab? Is there some way to quickly and indelibly mark > the leader? I haven't found a w

Re: How do you keep track of exposed film?

essing > > (to The Slideprinter) about 5 rolls at a time. I > > number the rolls, and ask the lab to note the roll > > numbers on the slide boxes. Sometimes that happens, > > and sometimes not. Last year I came back from a trip > > with 15 exposed rolls, and the boxes came

Re: How do you keep track of exposed film?

for processing > (to The Slideprinter) about 5 rolls at a time. I > number the rolls, and ask the lab to note the roll > numbers on the slide boxes. Sometimes that happens, > and sometimes not. Last year I came back from a trip > with 15 exposed rolls, and the boxes came back with no >

RE: How do you keep track of exposed film?

waste a frame and photograph the info you need for your records. FWIW, I don't do anything to keep track other than to put the exposed film in an envelope and write on the envelope what's on the film. Shel > [Original Message] > From: Rick Womer > > The problem: I send

Re: How do you keep track of exposed film?

>> S...how do others keep track of rolls through the >> lab? Is there some way to quickly and indelibly mark >> the leader? Hi, perhaps I am lucky to have access to a good professional lab locally. When I brought them a huge pile of film from a big assignment, (not as frequently as I would li

Re: How do you keep track of exposed film?

On 8 Apr 2005 at 19:32, Bob W wrote: > I haven't found a way. When I'm shooting a lot of film over a > reasonable period of time I pre-number the rolls by writing on the > can. When I load the film into the camera I write the film number in > my notebook, and write my notes under that film number.

Re: How do you keep track of exposed film?

find a lab that does it right 100% of the time. it'll cost you. but that is yet another reason why i switched to digital. Herb... - Original Message - From: "Rick Womer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 11:53 AM Subject: How do you keep

Re: How do you keep track of exposed film?

a good pro lab will number the individual mounted slides according to your specs too. Herb - Original Message - From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 5:20 PM Subject: Re: How do you keep track of exposed film? My lab (and mos

Re: How do you keep track of exposed film?

On 8 Apr 2005 at 19:44, Herb Chong wrote: > a good pro lab will number the individual mounted slides according to your > specs > too. I wouldn't know, I never ever ask labs to cut my films let alone mount them, too many bitter memories. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UT

Re: How do you keep track of exposed film?

April 08, 2005 11:53 AM Subject: How do you keep track of exposed film? > The problem: I send my slide film out for processing > (to The Slideprinter) about 5 rolls at a time. I > number the rolls, and ask the lab to note the roll > numbers on the slide boxes. Sometimes that happens, &g

Re: How do you keep track of exposed film?

notch slide processor who does > what I ask of him. > > Kenneth Waller > > - Original Message - > From: "Rick Womer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 11:53 AM > Subject: How do you keep track of exposed film? > > >

Re: How do you keep track of exposed film?

- Original Message - From: "Rick Womer" Subject: How do you keep track of exposed film? > S...how do others keep track of rolls through the lab? Is there some way to quickly and indelibly mark the leader? Take a picture of the film ID you are assigning it on th

Re: How do you keep track of exposed film?

the rolls, and ask the lab to note the roll RW> numbers on the slide boxes. Sometimes that happens, RW> and sometimes not. Last year I came back from a trip RW> with 15 exposed rolls, and the boxes came back with no RW> numbers, which was a real pain. RW> S...how do others

Re: How do you keep track of exposed film?

> Servus, Alin > > Rick wrote: > RW> The problem: I send my slide film out for > processing > RW> (to The Slideprinter) about 5 rolls at a time. > I > RW> number the rolls, and ask the lab to note the > roll > RW> numbers on the slide boxes. Sometimes that

Re: How do you keep track of exposed film?

I'd have thought the solution was simpler than that. Carry around a small notepad with you, with numbers 1 thru "however many rolls you're carrying that day" inked in thick black felt pen, and let the first frame of each roll be shot of it's own sequential roll number, at minimum focus distance. No

Re: How do you keep track of exposed film?

: "Rick Womer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 9:53 PM Subject: Re: How do you keep track of exposed film? > Ken, > > Who and where? > > Answer back-channel if you wish. > > Rick > > --- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

RE: How do you keep track of exposed film?

EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 9. april 2005 19:37 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Re: How do you keep track of exposed film? I'd have thought the solution was simpler than that. Carry around a small notepad with you, with numbers 1 thru "however many rolls you're carrying that day" inke

Lightroom's handling of over/under exposed areas in images

Lately, i’ve been experiencing bright reds in overexposed white-ish areas in images in LR and bright-blue in underexposed black-ish areas. I’m always able to eliminate the latter by backing off the black in tone controls. Most of the time I can do the same with the former by backing off the hig

OT 25 year old TX - exposed need to develop suggestions?

Any tips? My friend has 8 rolls of Tri-x that have been stored away (but who knows about various temperatures and stuff) Modernage was going to charge her $22 each for D and C... (ouch) we both thought about her getting one roll done as a test As it happens, btw, they were all taken with

Re: Lightroom's handling of over/under exposed areas in images

eth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Eric Weir" Subject: Lightroom's handling of over/under exposed areas in images Lately, i’ve been experiencing bright reds in overexposed white-ish areas in images in LR and bright-blue in und

Re: Lightroom's handling of over/under exposed areas in images

Eric, In the Develop module, look at the triangles in the upper corners of the histogram. If they’re white, the colors you mention show up in the under- or over- exposed areas of the image. If you click on them they turn black, and the blue and red areas disappear. I find the underexposure

Re: Lightroom's handling of over/under exposed areas in images

It the problem suddenly started happening I wonder if it could be related to color management settings. Maybe the monitor's profile was inadvertently changed? Does it only happen with images from the Fuji? Mark Eric Weir wrote: Lately, i’ve been experiencing bright reds in overexposed white-i

Re: Lightroom's handling of over/under exposed areas in images

> On Jul 22, 2017, at 12:52 PM, Ken Waller wrote: > > I'm not familiar with Lightroom or the Fuji, but I've run into similar issues > with my K-3 and Photoshop. I've overcome it by looking at the image in the > RGB histogram and adjusting the offending color to reduce that particular > offend

Re: Lightroom's handling of over/under exposed areas in images

> On Jul 22, 2017, at 1:54 PM, Rick Womer wrote: > > In the Develop module, look at the triangles in the upper corners of the > histogram. > > If they’re white, the colors you mention show up in the under- or over- > exposed areas of the image. > > If you click o

Re: Lightroom's handling of over/under exposed areas in images

> On Jul 23, 2017, at 11:33 AM, Mark C wrote: > > It the problem suddenly started happening I wonder if it could be related to > color management settings. Maybe the monitor's profile was inadvertently > changed? Does it only happen with images from the Fuji? Thanks, Mark. Do you mean color s

Re: Lightroom's handling of over/under exposed areas in images

Eric Weir wrote: On Jul 22, 2017, at 12:52 PM, Ken Waller wrote: I'm not familiar with Lightroom or the Fuji, but I've run into similar issues with my K-3 and Photoshop. I've overcome it by looking at the image in the RGB histogram and adjusting the offending color to reduce that particular

Re: Lightroom's handling of over/under exposed areas in images

I'm thinking of the color profile assigned to your monitor - but not using a Mac I don't know that I can help. On a Windows machine there is a color profile assigned to your monitor that is used by Lightroom and other apps to adjust the colors so that what you see is accurate. If there is a pro

Re: Lightroom's handling of over/under exposed areas in images

Learn to love the histogram, learn to ignore it when it lies. On 7/24/2017 2:54 PM, Eric Weir wrote: On Jul 22, 2017, at 12:52 PM, Ken Waller wrote: I'm not familiar with Lightroom or the Fuji, but I've run into similar issues with my K-3 and Photoshop. I've overcome it by looking at the ima

Re: Lightroom's handling of over/under exposed areas in images

Histograms don't lie, but you have to know their language. For example. A photo with no highlights will display a histogram with no right side. You can still use it to fine tune contrast and tonal range. Paul via phone > On Jul 24, 2017, at 9:04 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: > > Learn to love the h

Re: Lightroom's handling of over/under exposed areas in images

Exactly, they don't lie, but they can't tell you the whole story either. And they only show you reflected light, not incident. The more tools you have to measure light the better informed you'll be with more consistent results. Still, not using histograms is to miss out on a lot of great exposure

Re: Lightroom's handling of over/under exposed areas in images

I'm speaking more to using the histogram post exposure in rendering. At that point reflected light is the only light that counts, so the histogram can indeed tell you a very co Plate exposure story. Paul via phone > On Jul 24, 2017, at 9:40 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > > Exactly, they don't lie

Re: OT 25 year old TX - exposed need to develop suggestions?

On Oct 13, 2009, at 01:12 , ann sanfedele wrote: What are the chances anything worthwhile could come out of them? Basically, they are pictures of her oldest daughter (I bet there is more than that in there) Any suggestions about processing them? I used to do all my own stuff, as some of y

Re: OT 25 year old TX - exposed need to develop suggestions?

ann sanfedele wrote: > Any tips? My friend has 8 rolls of Tri-x that have been stored away > (but who knows about various temperatures and stuff) > > Modernage was going to charge her $22 each for D and C... (ouch) we > both thought about her getting one roll done as a test > > As

Re: OT 25 year old TX - exposed need to develop suggestions?

> > Two words - Base Fog > Three more words - latent image regression. So don't be tempted to reduce development. In fact the severely low density difference between elvated base+fog and reduced highlight density calls for increased development and to hell with fog. You can reduce that later wi

Re: OT 25 year old TX - exposed need to develop suggestions?

On 10/13/09, ann sanfedele wrote: > Any tips? My friend has 8 rolls of Tri-x that have been stored away (but > who knows about various temperatures and stuff) Seat-of-your-pants method. Increase development time by at least 20% and agitate the hell out of it. Scan the negs and fix it in Phot

Re: OT 25 year old TX - exposed need to develop suggestions?

Scott Loveless wrote: On 10/13/09, ann sanfedele wrote: Any tips? My friend has 8 rolls of Tri-x that have been stored away (but who knows about various temperatures and stuff) Seat-of-your-pants method. Increase development time by at least 20% and agitate the hell out of it.

Re: OT 25 year old TX - exposed need to develop suggestions?

Well - between the chemical smells , my eyes, and my laziness I think I'll just let her take the film to a lab. (one role being a guinea pig) I told her I'd ask the list about it. 20 years ago I'd have thought it was fun too, Anthony... and would have had the stamina to do it No more

Re: OT 25 year old TX - exposed need to develop suggestions?

Ann, IMHO, scanning by yourself is the best way. However, it will be tedious because you will have to adjust the curve probably individually. If you and your friend are adventurous, would you like to send a roll for me to try? I have Rodinal, and HC-110. I also have an old scanner. ;) -Pasvor

RE: OT 25 year old TX - exposed need to develop suggestions?

> > Any tips? My friend has 8 rolls of Tri-x that have been > stored away > (but who knows about various temperatures and stuff) > > Modernage was going to charge her $22 each for D and C... > (ouch) we both thought about her getting one roll done as a test > > As it happens, btw, they w

Re: OT 25 year old TX - exposed need to develop suggestions?

From: ann sanfedele Scott Loveless wrote: >On 10/13/09, ann sanfedele wrote: > > >>Any tips? My friend has 8 rolls of Tri-x that have been stored away (but >>who knows about various temperatures and stuff) >> >> > >Seat-of-your-pants method. Increase development time by at least 20%

Re: OT 25 year old TX - exposed need to develop suggestions?

John Sessoms wrote: From: ann sanfedele Scott Loveless wrote: >On 10/13/09, ann sanfedele wrote: > > >>Any tips? My friend has 8 rolls of Tri-x that have been stored away (but >>who knows about various temperatures and stuff) >>>> > >Seat-of-your-pants method. Increase develo

Re: OT 25 year old TX - exposed need to develop suggestions?

HC110 is supposed to be a relatively low fog developer. That might help a bit but I wouldn't expect miracles. If they were all the same expiration date, batch, and were stored the same way a test might make sense, however since they weren't every roll is likely to be an experiment that won't

Re: Vivian Maier EXPOSED In Suburbia - Around Town - Downers Grove Patch, IL

So here's what's happening in my neighborhood. If anybody is interested in seeing this show, let me know. Maybe we can meet there. Regards, Bob S. > http://downersgrove.patch.com/groups/around-town/p/vivian-maier-exposed-in-suburbia_06e9bbea-downersgrove#.U6BTo-TgjJI.gmail --

RE: OT: Vinyl vs. Digital - the "all vinyl is noisy" myth exposed in video

I forgot I had this turntable demo video online. I don't hear no stinkin scratches, tics, or pops on this demo video (not even one): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lnqv2XjZVYs (turn on your video annotations if not already) Cheers... -- J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net) Join the CD PLAY

RE: OT: Vinyl vs. Digital - the "all vinyl is noisy" myth, exposed in video

From: "J.C. O'Connell" I forgot I had this turntable demo video online. I don't hear no stinkin scratches, tics, or pops on this demo video (not even one): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lnqv2XjZVYs (turn on your video annotations if not already) OTOH, there's an audible hiss throughout the v

Re: OT: Vinyl vs. Digital - the "all vinyl is noisy" myth, exposed in video

Exactly right. > What about if you DON'T have the right equipment? You have to decide if you > want to spend the money on audiophile stereo equipment ... or do you want to > spend it on something else? > > Someone was bandying about the number $2500 for a good vinyl reproduction > system. Gotta'

RE: OT: Vinyl vs. Digital - the "all vinyl is noisy" myth, exposed in video

mber 14, 2009 2:35 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: OT: Vinyl vs. Digital - the "all vinyl is noisy" myth, exposed in video Exactly right. > What about if you DON'T have the right equipment? You have to decide > if you want to spend the money on audiophile stere

Re: OT: Vinyl vs. Digital - the "all vinyl is noisy" myth, exposed in video

ahoo.com/group/cdsound/ -Original Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tom C Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 2:35 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: OT: Vinyl vs. Digital - the "all vinyl is noisy" myth, exposed in video

Re: APS film -- exposed or not? (was RE: Carry-on inspection of film -- and an unfortunate incident)

- Original Message - From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 6:21 PM Subject: Re: APS film -- exposed or not? (was RE: Carry-on inspection of film -- and an unfortunate incident) . However, your assumption ab

Re: APS film -- exposed or not? (was RE: Carry-on inspection of film -- and an unfortunate incident)

OTOH, some of the attitudes expressed toward film customers can only accelerate the adoption of digital. Geoff 8:^) - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http

Re: APS film -- exposed or not? (was RE: Carry-on inspection of film -- and an unfortunate incident)

- Original Message - From: Geoffgo Subject: Re: APS film -- exposed or not? (was RE: Carry-on inspection of film -- and an unfortunate incident) > OTOH, some of the attitudes expressed toward film customers can only > accelerate the adoption of digital. Sure, and these same moron

Re: APS film -- exposed or not? (was RE: Carry-on inspection of film -- and an unfortunate incident)

- Original Message - From: Peifer, William Subject: RE: APS film -- exposed or not? (was RE: Carry-on inspection of film -- and an unfortunate incident) > Bill Robb wrote: > [Everything I always wanted to know about APS processors, and more. > Snipped] > > Hi Bill,

  1   2   >