ted from a bug hotel in my garden using in-camera image
blending"
"The Stream Garden ... is shown here in all its glory in the first
morning light using HDR."
The whole selection looks like an ad for a well-known photo enhancement
software. But don't take my word for it.
.
ann
On 2/9/2023 5:11 PM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
Am 09.02.23 um 22:12 schrieb John Sessoms:
HDR has its place.
It certainly has and I've used it at times. Much like perfume or
make-up, it's best when it's not immediately apparent.
Nothing wrong with using it as an effect li
Am 09.02.23 um 22:12 schrieb John Sessoms:
HDR has its place.
It certainly has and I've used it at times. Much like perfume or
make-up, it's best when it's not immediately apparent.
Nothing wrong with using it as an effect like solarisation or multiple
exposure, but cranking
I would love to create images like that "Blue Tajinaste, La Palma,
Canary Islands" ...
HDR has its place.
On 2/9/2023 10:48 AM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
The Guardian presents the winners of this year's international garden
photographer of the year competition.
"The w
/added) mist..."
>
> "... which I created from a bug hotel in my garden using in-camera image
> blending"
>
> "The Stream Garden ... is shown here in all its glory in the first
> morning light using HDR."
>
> The whole selection looks like an ad for a
Over saturation = overrated !!
Cot
On 9 Feb 2023, at 15:48, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
The whole selection looks like an ad for a well-known photo enhancement
software. But don't take my word for it.
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/gallery/2023/feb/08/international-garden-photographe
amera image
blending"
"The Stream Garden ... is shown here in all its glory in the first
morning light using HDR."
The whole selection looks like an ad for a well-known photo enhancement
software. But don't take my word for it.
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/gallery/2023/
the
> colored lights in the background wouldn’t be totally blown out. As you well
> know, HDR doesn’t work particularly well when things move around in the
> frame. Combine that with oversaturated lighting and the results can be
> rather entertaining.
>
> https://www.flickr.c
that pot is legal in
California, the ambience of the room was nostalgic of my college years.
I was bracketing with the silly hope of being able to combine images so the
colored lights in the background wouldn’t be totally blown out. As you well
know, HDR doesn’t work particularly well when things
>>> On Dec 29, 2019, at 1:36 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I took some bracketed photos of a “new year’s tree”, I figured the dynamic
>>>> range from glowing lights to ornaments in an otherwise dim room would give
>>>> HDR a reasonable
an otherwise dim room would give HDR
a reasonable work out.
Here are the hdrs processed in Lightroom 6
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/albums/72157712407455041
Here they are processed in On1
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/albums/72157712407573666
I think that On1 has a slight edge
Just looking at the humorous side of it, Larry.
> On Dec 30, 2019, at 2:50 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Dec 30, 2019, at 11:32 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>
>> I understand. But It struck me as yet another humorous example of PC
>> culture. I suppose we could rename the menorah “New Y
> On Dec 30, 2019, at 11:32 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> I understand. But It struck me as yet another humorous example of PC culture.
> I suppose we could rename the menorah “New Year’s Candelabra.” :-)
Except that even non-practicing people of Jewish descent in the Soviet Union
were perse
tree.
>
>
>>
>>>> On Dec 29, 2019, at 1:36 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>>
>>> I took some bracketed photos of a “new year’s tree”, I figured the dynamic
>>> range from glowing lights to ornaments in an otherwise dim room would give
>>> HDR
trees and everything, so for her it is a new year’s tree.
>
>> On Dec 29, 2019, at 1:36 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>> I took some bracketed photos of a “new year’s tree”, I figured the dynamic
>> range from glowing lights to ornaments in an otherwise dim room would give
>&
Amazing! That looks exactly like a Christmas tree!
> On Dec 29, 2019, at 1:36 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> I took some bracketed photos of a “new year’s tree”, I figured the dynamic
> range from glowing lights to ornaments in an otherwise dim room would give
> HDR a reas
On December 29, 2019 1:17:02 PM PST, Henk Terhell wrote:
>To me LR has more HDR effect whereas On1 gives a more warm tone, more
>reddish.
The color balance was due to my lack of practice with on1.
>
>Henk
>
>Op 2019-12-29 om 07:36 schreef Larry Colen:
>> I took so
To me LR has more HDR effect whereas On1 gives a more warm tone, more
reddish.
Henk
Op 2019-12-29 om 07:36 schreef Larry Colen:
I took some bracketed photos of a “new year’s tree”, I figured the dynamic
range from glowing lights to ornaments in an otherwise dim room would give HDR
a
I think it is the other way around. Perhaps you should try posting
in pairs.
Alan C
On 29-Dec-19 08:36 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I took some bracketed photos of a “new year’s tree”, I figured the dynamic
range from glowing lights to ornaments in an otherwise dim room would give HDR
a
I took some bracketed photos of a “new year’s tree”, I figured the dynamic
range from glowing lights to ornaments in an otherwise dim room would give HDR
a reasonable work out.
Here are the hdrs processed in Lightroom 6
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/albums/72157712407455041
Here they
3-LCGhUCtH35orIlq_nAG6VQ
There is an interesting artifact:
20190120-LRC03649-HDR-2 has a yellow-turning-into-green circle on the
left side.
Yeah, probably chromatic aberration exacerbated by the HDR software. I
tried to correct it on a bunch of them, but there was only so much I
could do.
es the Moon
looking.)
There is an interesting artifact:
20190120-LRC03649-HDR-2 has a yellow-turning-into-green circle on the left
side.
Igor
Larry Colen Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:36:38 -0800 wrote:
My bigma sure ain't the hubble. I don't have time to do a super careful
job processing these,
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/31894921907/in/album-72157675791773657/
I've come to the realization that I really need to actually plan these
things out and think of them *before* I try to take the photos. I'm also
quite certain that I'll come to this very same conclusion again, about
racketing to see if I could get an HDR that got both the bright and the
> dark side of the moon.
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157675791773657
>
>
> --
> Larry Colen l...@red4est.com http://red4est.com/lrc
> https://www.flickr.com/ph
e I tried
doing some bracketing to see if I could get an HDR that got both the
bright and the dark side of the moon.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157675791773657
--
ann sanfedele photography
https://annsan.smugmug.com
https://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff
https://www.lulu.com/s
en wrote:
>> My bigma sure ain't the hubble. I don't have time to do a super
>> careful job processing these, but at the end of the eclipse I tried
>> doing some bracketing to see if I could get an HDR that got both the
>> bright and the dark side of
cketing to see if I could get an HDR that got both the
bright and the dark side of the moon.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157675791773657
--
ann sanfedele photography
https://annsan.smugmug.com
https://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff
https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan
--
P
ocessing these, but at the end of the eclipse I tried doing some bracketing
> to see if I could get an HDR that got both the bright and the dark side of
> the moon.
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157675791773657
>
>
> --
> Larry Colen l.
My bigma sure ain't the hubble. I don't have time to do a super careful
job processing these, but at the end of the eclipse I tried doing some
bracketing to see if I could get an HDR that got both the bright and the
dark side of the moon.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ell
Windows, Larry, Windows, it's the future!
On 2/18/2018 3:31 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Igor PDML-StR wrote:
There is a free giveaway of the previous version (current is 5):
of HDR projects4:
https://sharewareonsale.com/s/hdr-projects-giveaway-coupon-sale
It seems to have a plugin for L
There is a free giveaway of the previous version (current is 5):
of HDR projects4:
https://sharewareonsale.com/s/hdr-projects-giveaway-coupon-sale
It seems to have a plugin for LR.
So, it might be a reasonable tool for those who don't have Photoshop but
want to play with HDR.
I haven&#
Pretty impressive video capture of rocket engine:
http://www.theverge.com/2016/8/8/12404970/nasa-hdr-camera-rocket-boosters-test-watch
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
he sombre blue lights
>
> BTW, the lights on the left are the Port of Oakland, those structures are
> what inspired the Imperial Walkers in the Star Wars movies.
>
> >at the right. IMHO the bridge on its own is the best part. I have never
> >tried HRD so I don't know how
Imperial Walkers in the Star Wars movies.
at the right. IMHO the bridge on its own is the best part. I have never
tried HRD so I don't know how that affects it.
HDR doesn't (or shouldn't) affect color balance. I expect that the
lights at the port of Oakland are "vintage
age-
From: Larry Colen
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 3:04 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss List
Subject: Playing with panorama and HDR
As you might be able to tell, I'm making some progress on my backlog of
unprocessed photos from January and February.
Some night time photos of the east span of t
As you might be able to tell, I'm making some progress on my backlog of
unprocessed photos from January and February.
Some night time photos of the east span of the Bay Bridge: here is an
HDR panorama (shot with an FA*80-200 at 143mm):
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/245716286
the
dark exposures for a couple of frames. I ended up with a photo that on
first glance looks fine.
It would be too good to believe that the panorama software is also HDR
aware, and if you feed it everything from a bracketed panorama, it will
just do the right thing, throw away clipped data
Both the church and the image are quite beautiful.
I don't believe I've ever seen a church organ quite like that one.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> Here's an HDR panorama that I took
> On May 15, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> Here's an HDR panorama that I took at the church Matt brought me to in
> Pittsburgh. It's a panorama of 6 hdr images taken from the brightest and
> darkest of 3 exposure brackets, hand held.
> https://ww
Nice job, Larry! Cheers, Christine
> On May 15, 2015, at 11:43 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> Here's an HDR panorama that I took at the church Matt brought me to in
> Pittsburgh. It's a panorama of 6 hdr images taken from the brightest and
> darkest of 3 exposure bra
tings is
now a flourishing Church! BTW, I enjoyed your dancers too.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Larry Colen
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 6:43 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss List
Subject: HDR panorama, Pittsburgh church
Here's an HDR panorama that I took at the church Matt brought me to
Here's an HDR panorama that I took at the church Matt brought me to in
Pittsburgh. It's a panorama of 6 hdr images taken from the brightest
and darkest of 3 exposure brackets, hand held.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/17684473272/in/album-72157652798837056/
It would have,
to. My brief fling
with the new HDR, compared to Photomatix, is similar.
My conclusion: LR6 does a good-enough quick-and-dirty pano or HDR, but if you
want to go beyond the defaults you’ll probably need to stick with your more
specialized tools for these functions.
stan
On Apr 24, 2015, at 8
That image of the falls is stunning, Stan!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
>
>> On Apr 23, 2015, at 09:05 , Stanley Halpin
>> wrote:
>>
>> I tried the pano feature first thing.
>>
>> The same scene that I su
Quoting Mark C :
The HDR and Pano tool sound very useful - I use Photoshop and it has
tools that do the same functions. Any idea if the tools in LR are
the same as those in PS, or are they an improvement? (I'm guessing
that Mark R. would know...)
My understanding is that the new
Mark C wrote:
>The HDR and Pano tool sound very useful - I use Photoshop and it has
>tools that do the same functions. Any idea if the tools in LR are the
>same as those in PS, or are they an improvement? (I'm guessing that Mark
>R. would know...)
I don't have any i
The HDR and Pano tool sound very useful - I use Photoshop and it has
tools that do the same functions. Any idea if the tools in LR are the
same as those in PS, or are they an improvement? (I'm guessing that Mark
R. would know...)
Mark C.
On 4/22/2015 3:31 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I just
y tried stitching panos then doing an HDR merge, but that
didn't work. Next I'll HDR merge each frame of some HDR panos, then try
the pano merge of them. Since I'm getting unprocessed "raw" files, this
should work, where it would not have with jpeg based hdrs.
I did a
> On Apr 23, 2015, at 09:05 , Stanley Halpin
> wrote:
>
> I tried the pano feature first thing.
>
> The same scene that I submitted for this month’s PUG. That one was stitched
> in Photoshop 11.
> Three 645Z dng files, each about 66MB. Selected the three, searched and
> finally found the me
e time playing with LR6s new HDR feature. At first glance, I
>> am very happy with it. It seems to do pretty much exactly what I want in
>> HDR, it takes several DNG files and combines them into another DNG file with
>> expanded dynamic range, and no tone mapping.
>>
to get
Lightroom to process them.
For some photos I preferred the Photomatix version, while on others
Lightroom did the best job. Because it is so fast it is easy to try
Lighroom HDR and also Photomatix then pick the best product
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 23/04/2015
> On Apr 22, 2015, at 16:18 , Zos Xavius wrote:
>
> How is performance? Is the switch between library and develop any faster now?
>
I never really noticed any lag. Let me check.
About 3 seconds from "viewing a thumbnail" to "preview generated and ready to
go at 1:1" for a K5 DNG file.
-Ch
I've only done a little testing so far, but import, export, and 1:1 rendering
has become quite a bit quicker on my system. How much improvement you see is
dependent on what GPU your computer has.
Godfrey
> On Apr 22, 2015, at 2:18 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
>
> How is performance? Is the switch
How is performance? Is the switch between library and develop any faster now?
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
>
>> On Apr 22, 2015, at 14:31 , Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>> I just spent some time playing with LR6s new HDR feature. At first glance, I
>
> On Apr 22, 2015, at 14:31 , Larry Colen wrote:
>
> I just spent some time playing with LR6s new HDR feature. At first glance, I
> am very happy with it. It seems to do pretty much exactly what I want in
> HDR, it takes several DNG files and combines them into anothe
I just spent some time playing with LR6s new HDR feature. At first
glance, I am very happy with it. It seems to do pretty much exactly
what I want in HDR, it takes several DNG files and combines them into
another DNG file with expanded dynamic range, and no tone mapping.
I'm not sure,
Am 31.03.15 um 16:00 schrieb Stanley Halpin:
3. If you do try the in-camera HDR option, you will find that the time you are
waiting for the camera to process the several exposures into one HDR file and
then write that file to the card is a good time to read a short novel. Or you
could drive
I saw it!
-Original Message-
>From: Stanley Halpin
>Subject: Re: No HDR with RAW
>
>1. I sent the following yesterday, don’t think it ever showed up on here:
>
>> Someone said earlier that in-camera HDR is jpeg only. That is true only
>> through the K-5 varia
1. I sent the following yesterday, don’t think it ever showed up on here:
> Someone said earlier that in-camera HDR is jpeg only. That is true only
> through the K-5 variants; the K-3 does allow HDR when shooting RAW. The 645z
> does as well.
>
> Two additional notes:
> Soon
> On Mar 31, 2015, at 3:27 AM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
>
> Doing your HDR in postprocessing has a number of advantages. Unlike the
> camera, Enfuse can even align free-hand shots...
>
> http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/29854910
>
> and you ca
the file format is set to RAW. Since it says so, I
guess it’s true.
Curious. Do more recent cameras—K-5II, K-5IIs, K-3—permit HDR capture
with RAW?
I tried with my K3 last night. Yes, it outputs a raw file after doing an
HDR.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
Combining bracketed exposures as a pseudo-panorama does it too.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Ralf R Radermacher
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 9:27 AM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: No HDR with RAW
Am 30.03.15 um 17:44 schrieb Eric Weir:
Looks interesting.
Doing your HDR in
Am 30.03.15 um 17:44 schrieb Eric Weir:
Looks interesting.
Doing your HDR in postprocessing has a number of advantages. Unlike the
camera, Enfuse can even align free-hand shots...
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/29854910
and you can do HDR with one single RAW shot
>>
>>> Am 30.03.15 um 07:56 schrieb Paul:
>>>
>>>> Taking advantage of the extended dynamic range of RAW files for HDR is
>>>> pretty much a post processing domain. You might want to check out
>>>> EasyHDR...
>>>
>>>
>&g
her
way it uses TIFFs.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> Thanks Ralf!
>
> Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
>>
>> Am 30.03.15 um 07:56 schrieb Paul:
>>
>>> Taking advantage of the extended dynamic range of RAW files for HDR is
>>> prett
Someone said earlier that in-camera HDR is jpeg only. That is true through the
K-5 variants; the K-3 does allow HDR when shooting RAW. The 645z does as well.
Two additional notes:
Soon after I got my K-3 I emailed Pentax with a couple of questions:
1. The HDR sub-menu allows for a choice
Thanks Ralf!
Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
Am 30.03.15 um 07:56 schrieb Paul:
Taking advantage of the extended dynamic range of RAW files for HDR is
pretty much a post processing domain. You might want to check out
EasyHDR...
Lightroom users should have a look at the Enfuse plug-in:
http
at
> is set to RAW. Since it says so, I guess it’s true.
Curious. Do more recent cameras—K-5II, K-5IIs, K-3—permit HDR capture with RAW?
--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA USA
eew...@bellsouth.net
“...we are a for
> On Mar 30, 2015, at 3:54 AM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
>
> Am 30.03.15 um 07:56 schrieb Paul:
>
>> Taking advantage of the extended dynamic range of RAW files for HDR is
>> pretty much a post processing domain. You might want to check out
>> EasyHDR...
>
>
> On Mar 30, 2015, at 1:56 AM, Paul wrote:
>
> Taking advantage of the extended dynamic range of RAW files for HDR is pretty
> much a post processing domain. You might want to check out EasyHDR...
>
> http://www.easyhdr.com/
>
> The April issue of Advanced Phot
Am 30.03.15 um 07:56 schrieb Paul:
Taking advantage of the extended dynamic range of RAW files for HDR is
pretty much a post processing domain. You might want to check out
EasyHDR...
Lightroom users should have a look at the Enfuse plug-in:
http://www.photographers-toolbox.com/products
Eric -
Taking advantage of the extended dynamic range of RAW files for HDR is
pretty much a post processing domain. You might want to check out
EasyHDR...
http://www.easyhdr.com/
The April issue of Advanced Photographer (a UK photo mag) compared
EasyHDR, Photomatix and Nik's HDR m
, I guess it’s
true.
I don’t need, I probably wouldn’t understand, an explanation why. I’m
just disappointed. I’d like to see how it works. I guess I could give
it a try with JPEG.
The in camera HDR is a process to jpeg only option.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
It works by taking multiple exposures and combining them into a single
image. I suppose you could do it hand held if you're very steady,
however using a tripod is recommended.
On 3/29/2015 6:27 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
I see in the K-5 manual that high dynamic range capture, something I just
bec
You can shoot raw, bracket exposures & combine for HDR in post processing.
On 3/29/2015 6:26 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
I see in the K-5 manual that high dynamic range capture, something I
just became aware of and that i imagine would be useful given the
situations I often find mysel
I see in the K-5 manual that high dynamic range capture, something I just
became aware of and that i imagine would be useful given the situations I often
find myself in photographically, is not available when the file format is set
to RAW. Since it says so, I guess it’s true.
I don’t need, I p
I see in the K-5 manual that high dynamic range capture, something I just
became aware of and that i imagine would be useful given the situations I often
find myself in photographically, is not available when the file format is set
to RAW. Since it says so, I guess it’s true.
I don’t need, I p
I agree with Rick. Mostly. But it's labelled as "experimental" so keep
it coming and we'll continue to tear it to shreds. Mostly.
Chris
On 1 October 2014 01:16, Rick Womer wrote:
> Lovely compositions, excellent double exposures, but I really dislike the
> HDR.
&g
In principle, I loathe this kind of stuff. But some of those are cool.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> Kinda Theriaultean, only in color and on acid:
> http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london2/
>
>
> --
> Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
> www.robertstech.com
>
>
On 29/9/14, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
>A worthy experiment, Mark. For me Tube Train Blur is where your
>technique creates the most compelling shot.
Agreed.
Fascinating.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
_
Lovely compositions, excellent double exposures, but I really dislike the HDR.
I hope you post some non-HDR versions!
Rick
On Sep 29, 2014, at 9:20 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Kinda Theriaultean, only in color and on acid:
> http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london2/
>
>
Very cool! The multi exposures - ghost images - blurred motion give some
of these images a real dynamic feel! The HDr might be a bit heavy in
places
Mark
On 9/29/2014 9:20 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Kinda Theriaultean, only in color and on acid:
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london2
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> Attila Boros wrote:
>
>>The first ones are really freaky.
>
> That's kind of the idea. I regard this blurry, HDR technique as more
> of a "graphic design" thing than a "photography" thin
Attila Boros wrote:
>The first ones are really freaky.
That's kind of the idea. I regard this blurry, HDR technique as more
of a "graphic design" thing than a "photography" thing. Since I teach
in the Art & Graphic Design department and we don't have a seriou
s
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: GESO: London multi-exposure, freaky, experimental HDR stuff
Message-ID:<291k2ahvm56p78482vep18pdg6k4vvl...@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Kinda Theriaultean, only in color and on acid:
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london2/
The first ones are really freaky. I like the underground shots more,
particularly 7de02857_58_59_cgr and 7de02922_23_24_cgr.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> Kinda Theriaultean, only in color and on acid:
> http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london2/
>
>
> --
> Mark Robert
I get the all out fun of the concerted effort and actually like St James Tavern.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 6:20:47 PM
Subject: GESO: London multi-exposure, freaky, experimental HDR stuff
Kinda Theriau
I like all the ones underground the best... then Picadilly.
The others are a bit too over the top for me - but they kinda would
be even without the HDR :-)
"Ascending" was the first one that really worked for me..
liked all those in the tube but maybe Regent's park best -
wha
Quoting Mark Roberts :
Kinda Theriaultean, only in color and on acid:
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london2/
Freaky is right but interesting in an odd sort of way...
Most are a bit too much over-the-top for my taste but the technique
works well with "Swirling Descent", "Tube Train B
Wow! The color! Lollipop London! Great fun and like Bruce said, worthy
experiment. Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
> On Sep 29, 2014, at 8:40 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Interesting effect.
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 29,
Interesting effect.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> Kinda Theriaultean, only in color and on acid:
> http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london2/
>
>
> --
> Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
> www.roberts
A worthy experiment, Mark. For me Tube Train Blur is where your
technique creates the most compelling shot.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> Kinda Theriaultean, only in color and on acid:
> http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london2/
>
>
> --
> Mark Roberts - Photography &
I'll look after my dose of tv for tonight is done
and try to keep an open mind about freaky and HDR ;-)
ann
On 9/29/2014 21:27, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
And with that intro you want us to look?
Har!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/ma
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>And with that intro you want us to look?
Har!
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly ab
And with that intro you want us to look?
ann
On 9/29/2014 21:20, Mark Roberts wrote:
Kinda Theriaultean, only in color and on acid:
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london2/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE fro
Kinda Theriaultean, only in color and on acid:
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/london2/
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please vi
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:17:26PM +0200, Alunfoto - Jostein Øksne wrote:
> Larry,
> Assuming PSCS 6, look in the top right corner of the screen where
> you adjust the parameters for the HDR. You can choose 16 or 8 bit
> there.., Fingers crossed that solves your bit depth problem.
Larry,
Assuming PSCS 6, look in the top right corner of the screen where you adjust
the parameters for the HDR. You can choose 16 or 8 bit there.., Fingers
crossed that solves your bit depth problem.
Jostein
-Opprinnelig melding-
From: Larry Colen
The first problem that I seem to
The first problem that I seem to be having is that the files I get back
from photoshop seem to be treating the DNGs from lightroom as 8 bit jpegs
rather than 14/16 bit raws (despite it being set as 16 bit in preferences).
I think that this is a process that would also be greatly enhanced if it cou
Quoting steve harley :
on 2013-10-06 11:26 Mark Roberts wrote
...but it sells, so I need to be able to teach it to my students.
Hence this experiment.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7dd06804-hdr.htm
OMG that's goorjus!
Sounds like you're channelling Dick Solomon
http://www.youtube.c
1 - 100 of 393 matches
Mail list logo
