Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features: End of Rant

2002-08-12 Thread Bmacrae
In a message dated 8/12/2002 2:31:44 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Not especially, since it mearly means that you are derived from a long > succesion of women who were screwed by Scots. Yours were the male > descendants of a guy named Rae. > > As am I. From some Scot n

Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features: End of Rant

2002-08-12 Thread Joseph McAllister
on 08/02/02 12:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] shared with me: > By the way, it's MACRae. Ironic, isn't it? > > -Brendan MacRae Not especially, since it mearly means that you are derived from a long succesion of women who were screwed by Scots. Yours were the male descendants of a guy named Rae. As am I

Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features: End of Rant

2002-08-03 Thread Len Paris
Where would Lindows fit into that lineup? Len --- - Original Message - From: "Mishka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 6:37 PM Subject: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features: End of Rant > That's pretty close to my point

Re: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

2002-08-03 Thread Pentxuser
What I have a problem with is silly people like you saying such nonsense. Your ridiculous post is frankly, a joke. I HAVE used both machines and in my opinion Macs are not "superior" machines. Also, I have never had to bring any machine of mine to a shop to have it worked on and thinking that P

Re: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

2002-08-02 Thread Bmacrae
In a message dated 8/2/2002 10:11:26 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Brendan buddy you speak ill of the Mac, yet you have not used one. No matter > > what anyone says Macs are superior to PCs. I own both, I have used both and > > I'm sorry but I can honestly say that P

Re: Very OT: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

2002-08-02 Thread Pentxuser
Joe wordperfect is outdated even in the PC world. Microsoft Word is the way to go. Another program that originated on the Mac. Oh and, by the way, I have Wordperfect for the Macintosh and my Mac has F-keys. Vic - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://w

Re: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

2002-08-02 Thread Pentxuser
Brendan buddy you speak ill of the Mac, yet you have not used one. No matter what anyone says Macs are superior to PCs. I own both, I have used both and I'm sorry but I can honestly say that PCs are still a long way from a MAC. That's not to say that PCs are not useful, capable machines. Someon

Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features

2002-08-02 Thread Ryan K. Brooks
> Oh. Wait a minute. This is a _Pentax_ mailing list. Oh yeah. > Thank you. > Anyone out there seen any Digibino DB-100 sample pics? > I took about a 100 shots at the zoo last week. Nothing to write home about; learned a bit about how the focus works and now need to try again. I will say

Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features: End of Rant

2002-08-02 Thread Mishka
r and Nikon4000 scanner isn't supported even by VueScan. That's teh single virtue of both Win and Mac: they have just enough software written for them to make them usable. Best, Mishka. > From: Frits J. Wí²’í¸²ich > Subject: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features: End of Rant > Dat

Re: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

2002-08-02 Thread Cotty
Hi Brendan, Ah! >> So I repeat the challenge! C'mon Brendan, borrow a Mac for a few >> months [snip] >Oh, well, you slightly misunderstand Cotty. I love Macs! I have used them >many times in the past and I can say that they're terrific little machines. [snip] >would love a Titanium no

Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features: End of Rant

2002-08-02 Thread Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce)
Enough already. The original question had nothing to do with why your life is miserable with PC's, and everyone should buy a Mac. If you can contribute some first hand, relevant information about what was asked, fine. If you want to rant and rave about OS's, take it to an appropriate forum. - T

Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features

2002-08-02 Thread Collin Brendemuehl
PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Windoze 2000 features Collin, I hadn't thought about Corvus in nearly 20 years. We put in a network based on Ominet in 1985, it was the first system of it's type I'd ever worked on. We even looked at getting a 386 server for it, we just didn't

Re: Re[2]: OT: Windoze 2000 features: End of Rant

2002-08-02 Thread Bmacrae
In a message dated 8/2/2002 12:13:34 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > My best analogy is that the Mac is like Communism - closed, controlled > and little variance. In many respects, when it comes to computers, > this is a good thing. It leads to less compatibility problem

Re: Very OT: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

2002-08-02 Thread Treena Harp
When they work. I just got a brand-new G4 with everything at work. You can't enable the function keys. Even our tech guys can't figure it out. They're useless to me. > > The newer Mac keyboards have fifteen assignable function keys, labelled F1 > through F15; you can assign them to do anything yo

Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features: End of Rant

2002-08-02 Thread Bmacrae
In a message dated 8/2/2002 11:32:09 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Now if you re-format your hard > drive.. that's a different story as are hard drive crashes :-) . > Exactly! -Brendan MacRae - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to

RE: OT: Windoze 2000 features

2002-08-02 Thread Peifer, William [OCDUS]
Hi folks, Just wanted to thank all of you who provided useful feedback on all the issues surrounding upgrading of desktop PCs from Win9x to Win2k. I gathered a lot of useful information, I rathered enjoyed the lively discussion, and I think a lot of people got a chance to blow off some steam. S

Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features: End of Rant

2002-08-02 Thread Bmacrae
In a message dated 8/2/2002 11:02:24 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > And incidentally, Mr. McRae, Mac was given permission to use the graphic > interface from Xerox; Gates, however, stole it from Mac, and pretended it > was some great innovation of his making and got us al

Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features: End of Rant

2002-08-02 Thread Treena Harp
m: "Cameron Hood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 12:59 PM Subject: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features: End of Rant > I'm sorry to get so enraged. When I think of the hundreds and hundreds of > hours I spent in Windoze trying to f

Re[2]: OT: Windoze 2000 features: End of Rant

2002-08-02 Thread Bruce Dayton
Cameron, I can appreciate your severe frustration with a ridiculous situation. However, don't you think if the millions of other users had experiences similar to yours that they would have switched just as you did? The fact that Wintel is still the dominant (by leaps and bounds) system gives one

Re: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

2002-08-02 Thread Bmacrae
In a message dated 8/2/2002 2:09:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > So I repeat the challenge! C'mon Brendan, borrow a Mac for a few > months > > (Disclaimer: I used a Windows 95 box for a few months as a personal test, > and I use NT machines at work when I'm there

Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features: End of Rant

2002-08-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I must hand it to the M$ Tech Support (like most, not all, but most first line support staff) because they don't know diddly - Re-installing the O/S does not "wipe out everything" that you have on the computer - I've done it a few times for different friends/family/work colleagues etc. (see

Very OT: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

2002-08-02 Thread Cameron Hood
on 08/02/02 10:05 AM, pentax-discuss-digest at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Subject: Very OT: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze > 2000 features) > > For me, Macs have two drawbacks, the first a nuisance and the second > fatal: > > 1. No

Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features: End of Rant

2002-08-02 Thread Cameron Hood
I'm sorry to get so enraged. When I think of the hundreds and hundreds of hours I spent in Windoze trying to fix stupid errors that should not have happened and that I now know were only the result of bad software, I have a tendency to get furious. I recall when I first got my new Windoze 95 Pent

OT: Windoze 2000 features

2002-08-02 Thread pdml
Collin, I hadn't thought about Corvus in nearly 20 years. We put in a network based on Ominet in 1985, it was the first system of it's type I'd ever worked on. We even looked at getting a 386 server for it, we just didn't need that much power. PC-DOS 2.1, 3.1 and 40 - 60 MB Harddrives. H

RE: Very OT: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

2002-08-02 Thread Rob Brigham
Both sound like good endorsements FOR Macs!! > -Original Message- > From: Joseph Tainter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 02 August 2002 16:10 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Very OT: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! > (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2

Very OT: Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

2002-08-02 Thread Joseph Tainter
For me, Macs have two drawbacks, the first a nuisance and the second fatal: 1. No function keys - once you learn these with a program that employs them (e.g., WordPerfect, see below), they are much faster than a mouse. 2. One can't run WordPerfect, which is the basic tool with which I earn the m

Mac vs PC = neither is 'better' SHOCK! (was: Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features)

2002-08-02 Thread Cotty
>My opinion of Macs is that there are pretty, well designed, overpriced >status >symbols. While it may be true that "you get what you pay for," it simply >isn't true with Macs (not when you can get a better machine for less in a >PC). I have always owned PC's and have always been happy with th

RE: OT: Windoze 2000 features

2002-08-01 Thread Shaun Canning
Absolutely correct Rob. I do an enormous amount of high-end geospatial data analysis using various GIS packages. If you have a high-end PC running W2K SP2 and good components, it will stay afloat for months on end. I have been running now almost constantly for the last six months. The only interru

RE: OT: Windoze 2000 features

2002-08-01 Thread Rob Studdert
On 1 Aug 2002 at 9:45, Cameron Hood wrote: > That's why they are called a PC; a piece of crap. I will never buy another > one of those stupid, tacky, advertisment-filled unreliable pieces of crap as > long as I live. Dude, Chill. I've been snuggled in PC/Mac environs for years and I can tell yo

Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features

2002-08-01 Thread Bmacrae
In a message dated 8/1/2002 4:05:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > That's right. Get a grip, folks. The stuff stinks. Try putting a Mac zip > disk into a PC: just make sure you back everything up first. Blue screen of > death ensues. Fatal error (whatever that means). >

RE: OT: Windoze 2000 features

2002-08-01 Thread Mishka
Nah... Mac is a piece of (translucent) crap just as well. SGI has the Only True Way (TM). ...Oh my, it isn't Slashdot, is it? Mishka > From: Cameron Hood > Subject: RE: OT: Windoze 2000 features > Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002

RE: OT: Windoze 2000 features

2002-08-01 Thread Paris, Leonard
Hood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT: Windoze 2000 features It has been my experience that trying to upgrade any form of Windoze to any other on any kind of PC is an absolute nightmare. Windoze is designed for specific chi

Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features

2002-08-01 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Based on long experience with both systems, I respectfully disagree. While most PCs are fine, the Windoze platform is inherently unstable, and Microsoft just doesn't care. They rather spend their money on marketing and driving the competition out of business than improving their products. Of co

RE: OT: Windoze 2000 features

2002-08-01 Thread Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce)
Well, that's just swell. Do you happen to work for a living? Most companies have IT standards. Most companies have found out that support is the most expensive aspect of computers. To keep things simple there is A supported OS, one or two hardware platforms and a standard software load. If they

RE: OT: Windoze 2000 features

2002-08-01 Thread Steve Desjardins
Oh no. Not the "Mac vs. Wintel" argument. This is worse than the MZ-S vs. PZ-1P debate. Can't we do something calmer like argue about religion? - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pe

RE: OT: Windoze 2000 features

2002-08-01 Thread Peifer, William [OCDUS]
Cameron Hood wrote: > @#&%)_@#&%_)@(*@#%@!! [Expletives deleted.] But Cameron, why don't you tell us what you ~really~ think? HAR!! Thanks for that Mac testimonial -- I ~loved~ it!! I sent a copy to a Mac-using co-worker of mine. He's got about the same opinion of Bill Gates, Microsoft,

RE: OT: Windoze 2000 features

2002-08-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THEIR equipment. At home, I can do what I want...and maybe one day.. I will have that Powerbook.. Cheers, Dave Original Message: --------- From: Cameron Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 09:45:48 -0700 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT: Windoze 2000 features It has been my expe

Re: OT: Windoze 2000 features

2002-08-01 Thread Bmacrae
In a message dated 8/1/2002 9:48:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Get a mac. They are just plain better machines. For everything. Period. > > Cameron > Not true in the least. This is simply a myth. My wife has a brand new G4 at work that just died on her. She had so

RE: OT: Windoze 2000 features

2002-08-01 Thread Cameron Hood
It has been my experience that trying to upgrade any form of Windoze to any other on any kind of PC is an absolute nightmare. Windoze is designed for specific chipsets, and works best with these. Period. End of story. Yeah, you could get a pentium 1 at 75mhz to run windoze nt, but it would be so m