Keith,
Come on in the water is fine!
I lost my first 128meg USB drive, gave some to my kids, bought more
256 meg drives on sale ($19.95?), and held out until I found a 1 Gig
USB2.0 for $59.95. Picked up a 512meg USB2.0 for $34.95 last weekend
at Office Depot as I am filling the 1Gig...need to clea
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello Keith,
I have a sandisk cruiser that lets you put in any SD card you want.
So not only is it portable but you can use more media with it. Pretty
cool - I find it quite handy
Never heard of that item, Bruce...
I'll have to check it out.
Having said I've never used the Jum
Hello Keith,
I have a sandisk cruiser that lets you put in any SD card you want.
So not only is it portable but you can use more media with it. Pretty
cool - I find it quite handy
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, February 24, 2005, 11:04:48 AM, you wrote:
KW> Keeping with the basic theme of
Keeping with the basic theme of this post, I bought myself a Lexar Media
"JumpDrive 2.0 Pro," with male USB port, over Christmas.
I had been lamenting the loss of a 3.5" HD disc drive, and someone
mentioned the JumpDrive.
I haven't used it yet, but the principle is the same. And this is 512
Mb!
I agree. I have the Belkin card reader for the ipod. It is very slow
to read, and it takes a lot of batteries. On a new ipod (so the
battery holds a long charge), the indicator goes from full to scarily
close to empty when uploading 2GB.
In December in London I used it on days when my (only) 2BG c
Belkin has had two devices to move data to the iPod from digital
media or cameras for some time. I don't believe it is the best
solution, a standalone, dedicated storage device is much more
efficient at this task. I'm looking at one of the CompactDrive
units, as I have a trip coming up that I plan
On Feb 24, 2005, at 12:37 PM, Tom C wrote:
I would normally take a laptop with me without thinking twice. This
is a 2 week mostly guided tour trip to Italy with a lot of walking.
I'm trying to go as light as I can and I don't wish to leave my laptop
in the hotel.
I hear that Apple have announc
Bruce, thanks for that, two trusted endorsments are better than one :-)
Godfrey, I'll report to the list my impression when I get it.
j
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 18:26:41 -0800, Bruce Dayton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Juan,
>
> I have the CompactDrive PD6a with 60gb disk. I am very happy wi
Hello Juan,
I have the CompactDrive PD6a with 60gb disk. I am very happy with
mine. Especially the speed and battery life. I think you will be
pleased.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, February 23, 2005, 5:10:43 PM, you wrote:
JB> OK--enough.
JB> Among the conversation here, plus Rob's e
I'm very interested to hear your experience with the PD7X. I was
considering a similar purchase. :-)
Godfrey
--- Juan Buhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK--enough.
>
> Among the conversation here, plus Rob's endorsement, which I
> trust,
> plus a recent big print sale I made, I've been enable
In a message dated 2/23/2005 3:19:27 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My concern with all these devices without screens is there's no way to
confirm there's really anything readable on the disc. That goes double for a
CD/DVD
writer given the number of CDs I've had that are wr
OK--enough.
Among the conversation here, plus Rob's endorsement, which I trust,
plus a recent big print sale I made, I've been enabled. I just ordered
a Compactdrive PD7X with an 80GB disk and Mac firmware upgrade.
I'm planning to do some traveling this year--possibly taking the
transiberian, aft
On 23 Feb 2005 at 23:16, Nick Clark wrote:
> My concern with all these devices without screens is there's no way to confirm
> there's really anything readable on the disc. That goes double for a CD/DVD
> writer given the number of CDs I've had that are written by one machine and
> subsequently tur
;
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
Subject: Re: On-the-Go Storage, it works!
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 23:16:45 -
My concern with all these devices without screens is there's no way to
confirm there's really anything readable on the disc. That goes double for
a CD/DVD writer given
My concern with all these devices without screens is there's no way to confirm
there's really anything readable on the disc. That goes double for a CD/DVD
writer given the number of CDs I've had that are written by one machine and
subsequently turn out to be unreadable by another. In this case y
portable also. I suppose purchasing and using for a while should allay my
fears.
Tom C.
From: "Paul Ewins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
Subject: RE: On-the-Go Storage, it works!
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:31:51 +1100
Tom,
I'm still weighing
- - - - - -
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
www.markcassino.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 10:46 PM
Subject: Re: On-the-Go Storage, it works!
On 22 Feb 20
February, 2005 5:13 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: On-the-Go Storage, it works!
In a message dated 2/22/2005 4:22:05 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I'm looking for is something similar. However I'd like to have
around
120g capacity.
What I'
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:34:09 -0500, Mark Cassino wrote:
>The only problem with the X's Drive is the battery - after a year's use my
>X's Drive II can't hold a charge long enough to dump a 1 gig card. I
>contacted the place where I bought the drive, who basically said they
>recommended sending t
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Mark Cassino wrote:
> The only problem with the X's Drive is the battery - after a year's use my
> X's Drive II can't hold a charge long enough to dump a 1 gig card. I
> contacted the place where I bought the drive, who basically said they
> recommended sending the drive in
In a message dated 2/22/2005 4:22:05 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I'm looking for is something similar. However I'd like to have around
120g capacity.
What I'd like is a single device that will store 120g of data, provide the
ability to burn CD's and/or DVD's, and n
ive and enough computing power
to view the files (assuming a RAW converter) and move the files between
directories.
Paul Ewins
Melbourne, Australia
-Original Message-----
From: Tom C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: On-the-Go Storage, it works!
What I'd like is a single device
On 22 Feb 2005 at 21:34, Mark Cassino wrote:
> The only problem with the X's Drive is the battery - after a year's use my X's
> Drive II can't hold a charge long enough to dump a 1 gig card. I contacted the
> place where I bought the drive, who basically said they recommended sending
> the
> dri
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
like this.
I'm sure there is niche market I just can't work out where, definitely not
for
someone who has shelled out big $$$ for a DSLR and lenses I guess. The
Vosonic
XS-Drive though not a show stopper its self it is more th
Rob Studdert wrote:
>inexpensive:
>
>http://www.xs-drive.com/xsdrive2/
>http://thedigitaldiscount.com/index.php?cPath=4_53
>
Indeed. I take back my argument, and bow to your impressive link-fu.
The various XS-drive type things are far more functional, for only
slightly more money, and by the ti
I have a 40g Flashtrax, but I anticipate far exceeding it's
capacity on a 2 week vacation, plus if it were to 'go south' I'd lose
everything. I want to be able to burn a backup copy to CD/DVD after
copying files from the compact flash to the hard drive.
Does anything like this exist in a singl
On 22 Feb 2005 at 20:44, Jon Paul Schelter (R* Toronto wrote:
> But.. The enclosure can be had for ~$40CDN, and 2.5" drives are
> available from ~$90-175 CDN for 30-800GB sizes.. That's pretty cheap
> compared to the ~$400-900 CDN units that have a more complicated
> interface ( http://tinyurl.com
>-Original Message-
>From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 9:28 PM
>To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
>Subject: RE: On-the-Go Storage, it works!
>
>I'm just a bit baffled regarding the advantage of this unit
>over the abund
On 22 Feb 2005 at 20:14, Jon Paul Schelter (R* Toronto) wrote:
> That looks really cool, Timothy.
>
> Does it deal with overwrites, or assume you'll clean out the camera?
> (i.e. what does it do if you press copy twice?)
>
> Looks like it's a one-button interface, from the top google hits:
>
>
>From: Timothy Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 6:54 PM
>Subject: On-the-Go Storage, it works!
>
>I have solved my problem of mobile storage using a Bytecc
>(www.bytecc.com) model 940 USB 2.0 enclosure. This is a
>modified USB 2.0 e
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: RE: On-the-Go Storage, it works!
What I'm looking for is something similar. However I'd like to
have around 120g capacity.
What I'd like is a single device that will store 120g of data,
provide the ability to bu
Tom C mused:
>
> What I'd like is a single device that will store 120g of data, provide the
> ability to burn CD's and/or DVD's, and not require a computer.
I think you might have difficulty finding that.
At present I don't think you can get 120GB in a 2.5" drive;
certainly not at a price that y
On 22 Feb 2005 at 17:18, Tom C wrote:
> What I'm looking for is something similar. However I'd like to have around
> 120g
> capacity.
>
> What I'd like is a single device that will store 120g of data, provide the
> ability to burn CD's and/or DVD's, and not require a computer.
As far as I'm aw
m: Timothy Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: On-the-Go Storage, it works!
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:54:09 -0800
I have solved my problem of mobile storage using a Bytecc (www.bytecc.com)
model 940 USB 2.0 enclosure. This is a
I have solved my problem of mobile storage using a Bytecc (www.bytecc.com)
model 940 USB 2.0 enclosure. This is a modified USB 2.0 enclosure running with
additional firmware (OSB is a new USB 2.o initiative) allowing it to store
files without a computer.
I also bought a 40gb Samsung 2.5 inch dr
35 matches
Mail list logo
